Ben Jonson and the Mirror: Folly Knows No Gender
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 6-2001 Ben Jonson and The Mirror: Folly Knows No Gender Sherry Broadwell Niewoonder Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, and the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Niewoonder, Sherry Broadwell, "Ben Jonson and The Mirror: Folly Knows No Gender" (2001). Dissertations. 1382. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1382 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEN JONSON AND THE MIRROR: FOLLY KNOWS NO GENDER by Sherry Broadwell Niewoonder A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2001 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. BEN JONSON AND THE M IR R O R : FO LLY KNOWS NO GENDER Sherry Broadwell Niewoonder, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2001 Ben Jonson, Renaissance poet and playwright, has been the subject of renewed evaluation in recent scholarship, particularly new historicism and cultural materialism. The consensus among some current scholars is that Jonson overtly practices and advocates misogyny in his dramas. Such theorists suggest that Jonson both embodies and promulgates the anti woman rhetoric of his time, basing their position on contemporary cultural material, religious tracts, and the writings of King James I. However, the external evidence cited by late twentieth-century writers as to the nature of women's position in seventeenth-century England is contradictory and speculative. A more productive method of determining misogyny in Jonson's dramaturgy is to look into the plays themselves. The approach taken in this dissertation is to focus on the question of misogyny, not from a position outside the text, but from a standpoint within the various dramatic worlds of Jonson's plays through three periods of his writing. Every Man in his Humour (1598), Volpone (1609), Epicoene (1609), and The Alchemist (1610) represent the early period. Bartholomew Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Fair (1614) and The Devil is an Ass (1616) reflect the middle period, and The Staple of News (1625) , The New Inn (1629) , and The Magnetic Lady (1632) represent the final period of Jonson's dramtic works. More specifically, the strategy is to focus on Jonson's satiric comedies through three periods of his writing in order to evaluate his attitude toward women, thereby to develop a hierarchy of wit among his female characters. Jonson, I find rejects the romance genre so capably practiced by his contemporary Shakespeare, preferring that drama reflect real life. In satire, Jonson discovers the perfect vehicle to practice Horace's dictum that poetry should instruct and delight; for, by definition, satire ridicules human folly for the purpose of correction. Since folly is the characteristic Jonson censures, then wit, in contrast, becomes the admired trait. "Wit," in the context of this discussion, is defined as an innate astuteness or ability to think on one's feet. The conclusions reached include (1) that Jonson creates proactive female characters in every phase of his dramatic work and (2) that women, at every level of astuteness, serve to highlight a male who is even more foolish. Jonson's net catches ineptitude in males and females alike. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3017314 Copyright 2001 by Niewoonder, Sherry Broadwell All rights reserved. UMI__ ® UMI Microform 3017314 Copyright 2001 by Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright by Sherry Broadwell Niewoonder 2001 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am pleased to acknowledge several people who have help to make this work a reality. First, and foremost, Dr. C. J. Gianakaris, an unflagging supporter, who has read every draft with a critical eye and has offered practical suggestions. Dr. Gianakaris believed in the validity of this work even when I experienced doubts. Next, I would like to acknowledge the work of Joseph C. Tardiff—my son—as technical editor. It is his perfectionist's eye that created order out of chaos in the electronic manuscript. Finally, I would to thank Dr. D. Terry Williams and Dr. Stephanie Gauper who responded with both encouragement and suggestions for improvement. In particular, Dr. Gauper's enthusiastic response provided the stimulus to bring the project to a successful conclusion. Sherry Broadwell Niewoonder ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................... ii CHAPTER I. THE PAST IS PROLOGUE .................................. 1 Introducing Ben Jonson ............................. 1 Notes to The Past Is Prologue...................... 6 II. RECONSIDERING JONSON'S POSITION ON WOMEN ............ 8 Conditions that Formed Jonson's Character ........ 8 Re-evaluating Jonson's Work ........................ 19 Jonson's Relationships with Women ................. 39 Notes to Reconsidering Jonson's Position on W o m e n ................................................. 42 III. WOMEN AND WIT .......................................... 51 Jonson's Hierarchy of Female Wit .................. 51 Proactive Representatives: Dol, Ursula, and P o l i s h ................................................ 56 Jonson's Active Representations: Bridget and Grace ............................................ 79 Reactive Representatives: Dame Pliant and Lady Lodes to n e ............................................ 99 Notes to Women and W i t ............................. 109 IV. UNIQUE RE PRESENTATIONS OF WOMEN AND W I T ............. 112 Epicoene: Male Construct of the Female Gender .... 112 Pru: Nobody's Long Lost Daughter.................. 124 Notes to Unique Representations of Women and W i t ................................................... 138 iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table of Contents—continued V. CELIA, HELPLESS OR INSIPID?: EVEN SHARPBEK HAD A CHOICE ................................................... 143 Celia's Hermetically Sealed World ................. 143 Notes to Celia, Helpless or Insipid? Even Sharpbek Had a Choice .............................. 160 VI. FRANCES FITZDOTTREL: THE ULTIMATE HEROINE ........... 163 Frances Overcomes the Circumstances of a Patriarchal System .................................. 163 Notes to Frances Fitzdottrel: The Ultimate Heroine.............................................. 184 VII. BEN JONSON IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY ............. 186 Jonson's Legacy ..................................... 18 6 Notes to Ben Jonson in the Twenty-First Century . 196 APPENDICES A. Ben Jonson: His Life, Plays, and Masques ............ 197 B. Correlation of Women and Wit in Jonson's Three Dramatic Periods ....................................... 200 BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................................