DOCSLIB.ORG

Amphibian Taxon Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amphibian Taxon Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 1 Table of Contents ATAG Definition and Scope ............................................................................................................ 4 Mission Statement .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Addressing the Amphibian Crisis at a Global Level ........................................................................................... 5 Metamorphosis of the ATAG Regional Collection Plan .................................................................................... 5 Taxa Within ATAG Purview ............................................................................................................ 6 Priority Species and Regions ................................................................................................................................... 6 Priority Conservations Activities ............................................................................................................................ 7 Institutional Capacity of AZA Communities ................................................................................... 7 Space Needed for Amphibians ............................................................................................................................... 8 Table 1: Space Analysis Summary of Managed SSP Programs .................................................................. 11 Species Selection Criteria ................................................................................................................ 12 The Global Prioritization Process ....................................................................................................................... 12 Selection Tool: Amphibian Ark’s Prioritization Tool for Ex situ Conservation .......................................... 12 Management Categories ................................................................................................................. 13 Results of Species Selection Process ............................................................................................... 14 Key to Categorical Designations .......................................................................................................................... 14 Priority I Taxa for Recommended for Ex situ Management ........................................................................ 15 Table 2: Recommended Priority I Taxa ..................................................................................................... 15 Priority II Taxa for Recommended for In situ and Ex situ Management .................................................... 16 Table 3: Recommended Priority II Taxa.................................................................................................... 16 Priority III Taxa for Recommended for In situ Efforts ................................................................................. 17 Table 4: Recommended Priority III Taxa .................................................................................................. 17 Program Status and Data Summary Tables of Current SSP Programs .......................................... 18 Table 5: Program Status Table of Priority I Taxa .............................................................................................. 18 Table 6: Animal Program Summary Data Table of Priority I Taxa ................................................................ 19 SSP Program Accounts .................................................................................................................... 20 Puerto Rican Crested Toad SSP ........................................................................................................................... 20 Wyoming Toad SSP ............................................................................................................................................... 22 Panamanian Golden Frog SSP(s) ......................................................................................................................... 24 Dusky Gopher Frog SSP ....................................................................................................................................... 26 Houston Toad SSP ................................................................................................................................................. 28 Recommendation Update Table ..................................................................................................... 30 Table 7: Recommended Updates from Species Listed in 2008 RCP .............................................................. 30 Considerations for New Studbook and Managed Ex situ Programs ............................................. 32 Decision Matrix for Forming New Ex situ Amphibian Populations for Conservation ............................... 33 2 Amphibian Husbandry .................................................................................................................... 34 Amphibian Disease Management in Captivity ............................................................................... 34 Amphibian Population Management and Data Entry Guidelines ................................................. 35 Suggested Taxa for Exhibit ............................................................................................................ 36 Table 8: Suggested Taxa for Exhibit .................................................................................................................... 36 Exhibit Species Examples ..................................................................................................................................... 37 Suggested Taxa for Outreach.......................................................................................................... 40 Table 9: Suggested Taxa for Outreach ................................................................................................................ 40 ATAG Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 41 Responsible Population Management: Humane Euthanasia ........................................................................... 41 Amphibians and Outreach .................................................................................................................................... 41 Amphibians in Classroom Settings ...................................................................................................................... 41 Contact Information ........................................................................................................................ 42 ATAG Steering Committee .................................................................................................................................. 42 ATAG Advisory Committee ................................................................................................................................. 42 Program Leaders ..................................................................................................................................................... 43 Species Champions/Contacts ............................................................................................................................... 44 Links to Amphibian Resources ...................................................................................................... 46 References ....................................................................................................................................... 47 Appendix I: AArk Amphibian Species Prioritization Ranking Process and Results ..................... 48 Appendix II: Creating Isolation Space for Amphibian Programs .................................................. 59 3 ATAG Definition and Scope Mission Statement To support the conservation of amphibians, both in situ and ex situ, through scientific management of assurance colonies, education and research. Amphibians are in Trouble! In 2008, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) conducted the Global Amphibian Assessment (GAA), which evaluated the status of 6,285 amphibian species. The GAA reported that the sizes of more than 43% of all measured amphibian populations had declined and less than 1% of populations had increased, indicating a troubling trend. Almost one-third Photo: Ian Recchio (32%) of amphibians are threatened with extinction Bolitoglossa sp. globally and 159 amphibian species may have already been lost. The majority of threatened amphibians reside in the New World, with the highest numbers in Columbia, “If the current rapid Mexico and Ecuador. Nevertheless, the bulk of endemic extermination of animals, plants species in rapid decline (80-90%) are from the Dominican and other species really is the Republic, Haiti, Cuba and Jamaica (IUCN, 2014). “sixth mass extinction,” then the amphibian branch of the tree of life is undergoing the most drastic pruning.” -Camila Ruz, Guardian UK, 2011 Photo: Dustin Smith Globally, habitat degradation, chemical pollutants, invasive species, climate change and disease have been the driving culprits behind amphibian declines. 4 Addressing the Amphibian Crisis at a Global Level The IUCN, WAZA (World Association of Zoos & Aquariums), CBSG (Conservation Breeding Specialist Group), the ASG (Amphibian Specialist Group) have called on zoos and aquariums to join in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wyoming Toad
    Wyoming Toad - Anaxyrus baxteri Abundance: Extremely rare Status: NSS1 (Aa) NatureServe: G1 S1 Population Status: Imperiled due to greatly restricted numbers and distribution, extinction is possible. This species is federally listed as endangered. Limiting Factor: Habitat: habitat modification, loss, and alterations in land use have resulted in severely restricted range. Comment: Formerly Bufo baxteri. Introduction Wyoming Toads are currently restricted to Albany County, Wyoming. Historically, this species was observed in the floodplains of the Big and Little Laramie Rivers (Odum and Corn 2005). In the mid 1970’s, Wyoming Toad populations experienced drastic declines. The exact cause of these declines is unknown, but possible causes include aerial spraying of pesticides, chytrid fungus, other diseases, and habitat alteration. Following this decline, the species was listed as federally endangered in 1984 (49 F.R. 1992, January 17, 1984) and was reported as possibly extinct in 1985. However, an isolated population of Wyoming Toad was discovered at Mortenson Lake in 1987. Today, this species is restricted in the wild to less than five sites in the Upper Laramie and Medicine Bow watersheds, including two Safe Harbor Agreement sites. Reproduction in the wild has only been documented at two sites since the species was listed. A captive breeding program has been implemented at ten institutions. Wild adults appear from hibernation when daytime temperatures reach approximately 70 degrees Fahrenheit (Baxter and Stone 1985). Breeding behavior typically occurs a week following emergence. Eggs are laid in shallow permanent waters. Egg masses contain 1,000 to 6,000 ova (Odum and Corn 2005). Wyoming Toad larvae typically transform by early August.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Annual Report 2018
    Wyoming Game and Fish Department 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Comprehensive Management System Annual Report 2018 ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents PAGE Organizational Chart .......................................................................................................................iii PROGRAM-LEVEL REPORTS Aquatic Wildlife Management .............................................................................................1 Bird Farms ...........................................................................................................................6 Conservation Education. .......................................................................................…….......9 Conservation Engineering ..................................................................................................13 Customer Services .............................................................................................................15 Department Administration ...............................................................................................21 External Research ..............................................................................................................25 Feedgrounds .......................................................................................................................29 Financial Management .......................................................................................................32 Habitat ................................................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • FEB Craig Guyer - 4 1999 Department of Zoology and Wildlife Science Auburn University Auburn, AL 36849 (334)-844-9232 [email protected]
    HISTORICAL AFFINITIES AND POPULATION BIOLOGY OF THE BLACK WARRIOR WATERDOG (NECTURUS ALABAMENSIS) FINAL REPORT FY 1998 FEB - 4 1999 Craig Guyer Department of Zoology and Wildlife Science Auburn University Auburn, AL 36849 (334)-844-9232 [email protected] SUMMARY 1) The Black Warrior waterdog is morphologically and genetically distinctive from other waterdogs in the state of Alabama and should be recognized as Necturus alabamensis. 2) The Black Warrior waterdog is most closely related to the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. 3) Four waterdogs are present in the state of Alabama, the two listed above, plus two forms from the Coastal Plains; the latter include Necturus beyeri (all rivers draining into Mobile Bay) and Necturus iodingi (Appalachicola to Perdido drainages, inclusive). 4) Populations of Black Warrior waterdogs in Sipsey Fork and Brushy Creek appear to be patchily distributed, creating challenges for determining key features of demography. 5) State and Federal protection of the Black Warrior waterdog as a threatened species is warranted. INTRODUCTION Waterdogs (Necturus: Proteidae) are paedomorphic, stream-dwelling salamanders of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. The systematics of these creatures has challenged herpetologists for the past 60 years. The Black Warrior Waterdog, a species restricted to the upper Black Warrior drainages of Alabama, has been particularly problematic. Viosca (1937) originally described this taxon as being similar toN maculosus, but subsequent taxonomic treattnents considered specimens from this drainage to be conspecific with waterdogs from the lower portions of the Mobile drainages (N maculosus: Bishop 1943, Schmidt 1953; N beyeri alabamensis: Hecht 1958, Conant 1958; N puncta/us: Brode 1969; N beyeri: Mount 1975; N alabamensis: Conant 1975, Conant and Collins 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts
    Pre-incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts Pre-incursion Plan PIP006 Salamanders and Newts Order: Ambystomatidae, Cryptobranchidea and Proteidae Scope This plan is in place to guide prevention and eradication activities and the management of non-indigenous populations of Salamanders and Newts (Order Caudata; Families Salamandridae, Ambystomatidae, Cryptobranchidea and Proteidae) amphibians in the wild in Victoria. Version Document Status Date Author Reviewed By Approved for Release 1.0 First Draft 26/07/11 Dana Price M. Corry, S. Wisniewski and A. Woolnough 1.1 Second Draft 21/10/11 Dana Price S. Wisniewski 2.0 Final Draft 18/01/2012 Dana Price 3.0 Revision Draft 12/11/15 Dana Price J. Goldsworthy 3.1 New Final 10/03/2016 Nigel Roberts D.Price New DEDJTR templates and document review Published by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Agriculture Victoria, May 2016 © The State of Victoria 2016. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 1 Spring Street, Melbourne 3000. Front cover: Smooth Newt (Lissotriton vulgaris) Photo: Image courtesy of High Risk Invasive Animals group, DEDJTR Photo: Image from Wikimedia Commons and reproduced with permission under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic License. ISBN 078-1-925532-40-1 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas) a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas) A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project May 25, 2005 Doug Keinath1 and Matt McGee1 with assistance from Lauren Livo2 1Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, P.O. Box 3381, Laramie, WY 82071 2EPO Biology, P.O. Box 0334, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Keinath, D. and M. McGee. (2005, May 25). Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/ assessments/borealtoad.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Deb Patla and Erin Muths for their suggestions during the preparation of this assessment. Also, many thanks go to Lauren Livo for advice and help with revising early drafts of this assessment. Thanks to Jason Bennet and Tessa Dutcher for assistance in preparing boreal toad location data for mapping. Thanks to Bill Turner for information and advice on amphibians in Wyoming. Finally, thanks to the Boreal Toad Recovery Team for continuing their efforts to conserve the boreal toad and documenting that effort to the best of their abilities … kudos! AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Doug Keinath is the Zoology Program Manager for the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, which is a research unit of the University of Wyoming and a member of the Natural Heritage Network. He has been researching Wyoming’s wildlife for the past nine years and has 11 years experience in conducting technical and policy analyses for resource management professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Tellico OHV Trail System Environmental Assessment
    Upper Tellico OHV System Environmental Assessment October 2009 Environmental United States Department of Agriculture Assessment Forest Service October 2009 Transportation System and Related Recreation Management Actions for the Upper Tellico Off-Highway Vehicle System Nantahala National Forest: Cherokee County, North Carolina Responsible Official Marisue Hilliard Forest Supervisor National Forests in North Carolina For Information Contact: Candace Wyman Project Coordinator 160 Zillicoa Street, Suite A Asheville NC 28801 (828) 257-4816 Upper Tellico OHV System Environmental Assessment October 2009 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Upper Tellico OHV System Environmental Assessment October 2009 Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Purpose and Need .............................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Conservation INTRODUCTION
    2014 | HIGHLIGHTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS amphibian conservation INTRODUCTION Zoos and aquariums accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) have made long-term commitments, both individually and as a community organized under the Amphibian Taxon Advisory Group (ATAG), to the conservation of amphibians throughout the Americas and around the world. With the support and hard work of directors, curators, keepers and partners, 85 AZA-accredited zoos and aquariums reported spending more than $4.2 million to maintain, adapt and expand amphibian conservation programs in 2014. The stories in this report are drawn primarily from annual submissions to AZA’s field conservation database (available when logged into AZA’s website under “Conservation”), as well as from articles submitted directly to AZA. They share the successes and advances in the areas of reintroduction and research, conservation breeding and husbandry and citizen science and community engagement. These efforts are the result of extensive collaborations and multi-year (even multi-decadal!) commitments. AZA congratulates each of the members included in this report for their dedication, and encourages other facilities to become involved. The ATAG has many resources to help people get started or to expand their engagement in amphibian conservation, and people are also welcome to contact the facilities included in this report or the ATAG Chair, Diane Barber ([email protected]). Cover: Spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer). Widespread throughout the eastern United States and with a familiar call to many, the spring peeper was the most frequently reported frog by FrogWatch USA volunteers in 2014. Although reports of spring peepers began in February, they peaked in April.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Black Warrior Waterdog Status
    STATE : Alabama PROJECT NUMBER: E-1 SEGMENT: 2 STUDY NUMBER: 5 BLACK WARRIOR WATERDOG STATUS SURVEY FINAL REPORT 1991-92 BY MARK A. BAILEY Dece:nber, 1992 Approved by: FINAL REPORT State: Alabama Study Title: Black Warrior Waterdog Status Survey Study No. 5 Project Title: Alabama Endangered Wildlife Projects Project No. E-1 Period Covered: 1 December 1990 to 30 September 1992 Prepared by: Alabama Natural Heritage Program Mark A. Bailey, Principal Investigator Notice of nomenclatural conventions used in this report: In the absence of a Latin name, and for the sake of clarity and convenience, the undescribed Nectwus of the upper Black Warrior River system will be referred to by its generally accepted common name, the Black Warrior waterdog. Despite uncertainty over the proper taxonomic placement of other species (N. beyeri and/or N. a/abamensis) with which the Black Warrior waterdog is sympatric in the lower portion of its range, it/they will be referred to as N. a/abamensis. Abstract: The Black Warrior waterdog, an undescribed form of Necturus endemic to the upper Black Warrior River system of Alabama, was surveyed for at 66 sites in nine counties from November, 1990 to February, 1992. Although gilled larvae of other salamander genera including Desmognathus, Eurycea, and Pseudotriton were encountered at 28 (45%) of the 62 sites sampled by netting, Necturus specimens referable to the Black Warrior waterdog were found at only four (6%) of the 66 sites netted and/or trapped: the Sipsey Fork of the Black Warrior River, Wmston County (six adults, one larva); Lost Creek, Walker County (one adult); North River and Yellow Creek, Tuscaloosa County (one larva and one subadult, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • The Salamanders of Tennessee
    Salamanders of Tennessee: modified from Lisa Powers tnwildlife.org Follow links to Nongame The Salamanders of Tennessee Photo by John White Salamanders are the group of tailed, vertebrate animals that along with frogs and caecilians make up the class Amphibia. Salamanders are ectothermic (cold-blooded), have smooth glandular skin, lack claws and must have a moist environment in which to live. 1 Amphibian Declines Worldwide, over 200 amphibian species have experienced recent population declines. Scientists have reports of 32 species First discovered in 1967, the golden extinctions, toad, Bufo periglenes, was last seen mainly species of in 1987. frogs. Much attention has been given to the Anurans (frogs) in recent years, however salamander populations have been poorly monitored. Photo by Henk Wallays Fire Salamander - Salamandra salamandra terrestris 2 Why The Concern For Salamanders in Tennessee? Their key role and high densities in many forests The stability in their counts and populations Their vulnerability to air and water pollution Their sensitivity as a measure of change The threatened and endangered status of several species Their inherent beauty and appeal as a creature to study and conserve. *Possible Factors Influencing Declines Around the World Climate Change Habitat Modification Habitat Fragmentation Introduced Species UV-B Radiation Chemical Contaminants Disease Trade in Amphibians as Pets *Often declines are caused by a combination of factors and do not have a single cause. Major Causes for Declines in Tennessee Habitat Modification -The destruction of natural habitats is undoubtedly the biggest threat facing amphibians in Tennessee. Housing, shopping center, industrial and highway construction are all increasing throughout the state and consequently decreasing the amount of available habitat for amphibians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Frogs of Panama (Atelopus Zeteki, A. Varius): a Conservation Planning Workshop
    The Golden Frogs of Panama The Golden Frogs of Panama (Atelopus zeteki, A. (Atelopus zeteki, A. varius): varius) A Conservation Planning Workshop A Conservation Planning Workshop 19-22 November 2013 El Valle, Panama The Golden Frogs of Panama (Atelopus zeteki, A. varius): A Conservation Planning Workshop 19 – 22 November, 2013 El Valle, Panama FINAL REPORT Workshop Conveners: Project Golden Frog Association of Zoos and Aquariums Golden Frog Species Survival Plan Panama Amphibian Rescue and Conservation Project Workshop Hosts: El Valle Amphibian Conservation Center Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Workshop Design and Facilitation: IUCN / SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group Workshop Support: The Shared Earth Foundation An Anonymous Frog-Friendly Foundation Photos courtesy of Brian Gratwicke (SCBI) and Phil Miller (CBSG). A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, in collaboration with Project Golden Frog, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums Golden Frog Species Survival Plan, the Panama Amphibian Rescue and Conservation Project, the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, and workshop participants. This workshop was conceived and designed by the workshop organization committee: Kevin Barrett (Maryland Zoo), Brian Gratwicke (SCBI), Roberto Ibañez (STRI), Phil Miller (CBSG), Vicky Poole (Ft. Worth Zoo), Heidi Ross (EVACC), Cori Richards-Zawacki (Tulane University), and Kevin Zippel (Amphibian Ark). Workshop support provided by The Shared Earth Foundation and an anonymous frog-friendly foundation. Estrada, A., B. Gratwicke, A. Benedetti, G. DellaTogna, D. Garrelle, E. Griffith, R. Ibañez, S. Ryan, and P.S. Miller (Eds.). 2014. The Golden Frogs of Panama (Atelopus zeteki, A. varius): A Conservation Planning Workshop. Final Report. Apple Valley, MN: IUSN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project Forest Pacific Southwest R5-TP-040 January Service Region 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project by: USDA Forest Service California Department of Fish and Wildlife National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Coordinators: Cathy Brown USDA Forest Service Amphibian Monitoring Team Leader Stanislaus National Forest Sonora, CA [email protected] Marc P. Hayes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Research Scientist Science Division, Habitat Program Olympia, WA Gregory A. Green Principal Ecologist Owl Ridge National Resource Consultants, Inc. Bothel, WA Diane C. Macfarlane USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Threatened Endangered and Sensitive Species Program Leader Vallejo, CA Amy J. Lind USDA Forest Service Tahoe and Plumas National Forests Hydroelectric Coordinator Nevada City, CA Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment Brown et al. R5-TP-040 January 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD WORKING GROUP MEMBERS The following may be the contact information at the time of team member involvement in the assessment. Becker, Dawne Davidson, Carlos Harvey, Jim Associate Biologist Director, Associate Professor Forest Fisheries Biologist California Department of Fish and Wildlife Environmental Studies Program Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest 407 West Line St., Room 8 College of Behavioral and Social Sciences USDA Forest Service Bishop, CA 93514 San Francisco State University 1200 Franklin Way (760) 872-1110 1600 Holloway Avenue Sparks, NV 89431 [email protected] San Francisco, CA 94132 (775) 355-5343 (415) 405-2127 [email protected] Boiano, Daniel [email protected] Aquatic Ecologist Holdeman, Steven J. Sequoia/Kings Canyon National Parks Easton, Maureen A.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]