DOCSLIB.ORG

Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas) a Technical Conservation Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas) a Technical Conservation Assessment Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas) A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project May 25, 2005 Doug Keinath1 and Matt McGee1 with assistance from Lauren Livo2 1Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, P.O. Box 3381, Laramie, WY 82071 2EPO Biology, P.O. Box 0334, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Keinath, D. and M. McGee. (2005, May 25). Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/ assessments/borealtoad.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Deb Patla and Erin Muths for their suggestions during the preparation of this assessment. Also, many thanks go to Lauren Livo for advice and help with revising early drafts of this assessment. Thanks to Jason Bennet and Tessa Dutcher for assistance in preparing boreal toad location data for mapping. Thanks to Bill Turner for information and advice on amphibians in Wyoming. Finally, thanks to the Boreal Toad Recovery Team for continuing their efforts to conserve the boreal toad and documenting that effort to the best of their abilities … kudos! AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Doug Keinath is the Zoology Program Manager for the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, which is a research unit of the University of Wyoming and a member of the Natural Heritage Network. He has been researching Wyoming’s wildlife for the past nine years and has 11 years experience in conducting technical and policy analyses for resource management professionals. His broader scope of research focuses on bat and small mammal ecology, survey, and monitoring at the population and landscape scales, and more recently on the spatially explicit predictive distribution modeling of sensitive elements (i.e., animals, plants, communities) of the Rocky Mountain West. Mr. Keinath earned a B.S. in Interdisciplinary Engineering (1993; magna cum laude) and a B.S. in Natural Resource Management (1993; with Distinction) from the University of Michigan and a M.S. in Wildlife Biology from the University of Wyoming. Matthew McGee was formerly a zoologist at the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database and is currently conducting field research in Alaska. He obtained a B.S. in Wildlife Biology from the University of Montana (1997) and a M.S. in Zoology and Physiology from the University of Wyoming (2002). COVER PHOTO CREDIT Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas). Illustration by Summers Scholl. Used with permission. 2 3 SUMMARY OF KEY COMPONENTS FOR CONSERVATION OF THE BOREAL TOAD The boreal toad (Bufo boreas boreas) shows declines in population size and distribution across its range in western North America. The population in the Southern Rocky Mountains (Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico) is particularly vulnerable to extinction during declines as it is geographically isolated from all other populations of boreal toads. Scientists believe the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis to be a contributing factor in boreal toad declines since the 1970s and currently see it as the primary threat to boreal toad populations throughout the Southern Rocky Mountains. However, the impact of B. dendrobatidis is compounded by other threats, the most widespread being habitat alteration from human disturbances around wetlands and human-facilitated expansion of natural and introduced predators. Habitat fragmentation further isolates breeding populations, which increases the effects of these widespread threats and the risk associated with other threats, such as local changes in water quality, timber harvest, livestock grazing, fire, and toxic chemicals (e.g., pesticides and herbicides). The main conservation concerns for land managers should be managing disease, cataloging and monitoring population status, delineating important habitat, and protecting delineated habitat. Of specific importance are developing techniques to effectively detect and treat Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infections in both wild and captive populations of boreal toads and identifying and protecting current breeding sites from habitat degradation, especially in the Southern Rocky Mountains. In order to ensure the survival of boreal toads in Region 2, local management plans must assess the impact of the threats discussed in this document at both the scale of the landscape connecting boreal toad populations and within individual populations. Further, it is necessary for land managers to preserve critical wetland and terrestrial habitats not only by directly protecting these areas but also by identifying important processes that create and maintain these habitats and working to ensure that these processes are functioning properly. 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..............................................................................................................................................2 AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES .........................................................................................................................................2 COVER PHOTO CREDIT .............................................................................................................................................2 SUMMARY OF KEY COMPONENTS FOR CONSERVATION OF THE BOREAL TOAD......................................3 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ...............................................................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................7 Goal............................................................................................................................................................................7 Scope..........................................................................................................................................................................7 Uncertainty and Limitations.......................................................................................................................................8 Peer Review and Treatment of Web Publications ......................................................................................................8 MANAGEMENT STATUS AND NATURAL HISTORY .............................................................................................8 Management Status ....................................................................................................................................................8 Federal Endangered Species Act ...........................................................................................................................8 Bureau of Land Management................................................................................................................................8 USDA Forest Service ............................................................................................................................................9 State wildlife agencies...........................................................................................................................................9 Natural Heritage Program .....................................................................................................................................9 Existing Regulatory Mechanisms, Management Plans, and Conservation Strategies...............................................9 Existing regulatory mechanisms ...........................................................................................................................9 Existing management plans.................................................................................................................................10 Southern Rocky Mountain Population ...........................................................................................................10 Northern Rocky Mountain Population ...........................................................................................................10 Existing conservation strategies..........................................................................................................................10 Biology and Ecology................................................................................................................................................11 Description ..........................................................................................................................................................11 Systematics..........................................................................................................................................................11 Range, distribution, and distribution trends ........................................................................................................14 Abundance and population trends .......................................................................................................................22 Activity and movement .......................................................................................................................................26 Habitat .................................................................................................................................................................27 General requirements......................................................................................................................................27
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wyoming Toad
    Wyoming Toad - Anaxyrus baxteri Abundance: Extremely rare Status: NSS1 (Aa) NatureServe: G1 S1 Population Status: Imperiled due to greatly restricted numbers and distribution, extinction is possible. This species is federally listed as endangered. Limiting Factor: Habitat: habitat modification, loss, and alterations in land use have resulted in severely restricted range. Comment: Formerly Bufo baxteri. Introduction Wyoming Toads are currently restricted to Albany County, Wyoming. Historically, this species was observed in the floodplains of the Big and Little Laramie Rivers (Odum and Corn 2005). In the mid 1970’s, Wyoming Toad populations experienced drastic declines. The exact cause of these declines is unknown, but possible causes include aerial spraying of pesticides, chytrid fungus, other diseases, and habitat alteration. Following this decline, the species was listed as federally endangered in 1984 (49 F.R. 1992, January 17, 1984) and was reported as possibly extinct in 1985. However, an isolated population of Wyoming Toad was discovered at Mortenson Lake in 1987. Today, this species is restricted in the wild to less than five sites in the Upper Laramie and Medicine Bow watersheds, including two Safe Harbor Agreement sites. Reproduction in the wild has only been documented at two sites since the species was listed. A captive breeding program has been implemented at ten institutions. Wild adults appear from hibernation when daytime temperatures reach approximately 70 degrees Fahrenheit (Baxter and Stone 1985). Breeding behavior typically occurs a week following emergence. Eggs are laid in shallow permanent waters. Egg masses contain 1,000 to 6,000 ova (Odum and Corn 2005). Wyoming Toad larvae typically transform by early August.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Annual Report 2018
    Wyoming Game and Fish Department 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Comprehensive Management System Annual Report 2018 ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents PAGE Organizational Chart .......................................................................................................................iii PROGRAM-LEVEL REPORTS Aquatic Wildlife Management .............................................................................................1 Bird Farms ...........................................................................................................................6 Conservation Education. .......................................................................................…….......9 Conservation Engineering ..................................................................................................13 Customer Services .............................................................................................................15 Department Administration ...............................................................................................21 External Research ..............................................................................................................25 Feedgrounds .......................................................................................................................29 Financial Management .......................................................................................................32 Habitat ................................................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas)
    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR BOREAL TOAD (BUFO BOREAS BOREAS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 2 MATT MCGEE AND DOUG KEINATH 1 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3023 2 Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] drawing by Summers Scholl prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming March 2004 McGee and Keinath – Bufo boreas boreas March 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 4 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 5 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 8 General ............................................................................................................................................8 Spring-Summer ...............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Disease: Implications for Conservation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2007 Amphibians and Disease: Implications for Conservation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Paul Stephen Corn Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Corn, Paul Stephen, "Amphibians and Disease: Implications for Conservation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem" (2007). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 103. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/103 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. NPS/ jeff ar N O L D Boreal toad (Bufo boreas) at High Lake. Amphibians and Disease Implications for Conservation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Paul Stephen Corn HE DECLINE OF AMPHIBIAN populations is a world- Flagg Ranch in 1995 and an occasional unsubstantiated report, wide phenomenon that has received increasing atten- this species has not been observed during recent surveys. The Ttion since about 1990. In 2004, the World Conser- remaining four species are distributed throughout the GYE, vation Union’s global amphibian assessment concluded that and their ranges do not appear to have retreated from historical 48% of the world’s 5,743 described amphibian species were in coverage of the landscape. However, some or all of these species decline, with 32% considered threatened (Stuart et al. 2004). are declining or have declined in some portions of the GYE.
    [Show full text]
  • ENDANGERED SPECIES: Groups Petition FWS to List Amargosa Toad (02/28/2008)
    ENDANGERED SPECIES: Groups petition FWS to list Amargosa toad (02/28/2008) April Reese, Land Letter Western reporter The Amargosa toad should be added to the federal endangered species list, according to a petition filed Tuesday with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by environmental groups. In their petition, filed Feb. 26, the Center for Biological Diversity and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility argue that urban development, water diversions and increased off- road vehicle use throughout the toad's range in Nevada's Oasis Valley have pushed the species toward extinction. According to the groups, the Amargosa toad is already restricted to a 10-mile stretch of the Amargosa River -- one of Nevada's last free- flowing rivers -- and adjacent desert uplands. "It only has a small amount of habitat," said Daniel Patterson, PEER's southwest director, who formerly worked for the Bureau of Land Management in Nevada as an ecologist. "It's got no where to go. There's really no room for error." FWS considered listing the toad in the 1990s after receiving a petition from environmental groups but decided the species did not warrant Males tend to be smaller, reaching 3 to 4 inches, while federal protection. At the time, FWS concluded females may reach 3.5 to 5 inches. Unlike most frogs and toads, the Amargosa toad is voiceless except for “release that the toad was more widespread than the calls” or chirps made by males when grasped below their petition suggested, although it also said more forelimbs by another toad or human. Photo courtesy of FWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Hanging Lake
    Evaluation of Hanging Lake Garfield County, Colorado for its Merit in Meeting National Significance Criteria as a National Natural Landmark in Representing Lakes, Ponds and Wetlands in the Southern Rocky Mountain Province prepared by Karin Decker Colorado Natural Heritage Program 1474 Campus Delivery Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 August 27, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 2 LISTS OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 5 Source of Site Proposal ................................................................................................... 5 Evaluator(s) ..................................................................................................................... 5 Scope of Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 5 PNNL SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 5 Brief Overview ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • DNR Letterhead
    ATU F N RA O L T R N E E S M O T U STATE OF MICHIGAN R R C A P DNR E E S D MI N DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHIG A JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM LANSING REBECCA A. HUMPHRIES GOVERNOR DIRECTOR Michigan Frog and Toad Survey 2009 Data Summary There were 759 unique sites surveyed in Zone 1, 218 in Zone 2, 20 in Zone 3, and 100 in Zone 4, for a total of 1097 sites statewide. This is a slight decrease from the number of sites statewide surveyed last year. Zone 3 (the eastern half of the Upper Peninsula) is significantly declining in routes. Recruiting in that area has become necessary. A few of the species (i.e. Fowler’s toad, Blanchard’s cricket frog, and mink frog) have ranges that include only a portion of the state. As was done in previous years, only data from those sites within the native range of those species were used in analyses. A calling index of abundance of 0, 1, 2, or 3 (less abundant to more abundant) is assigned for each species at each site. Calling indices were averaged for a particular species for each zone (Tables 1-4). This will vary widely and cannot be considered a good estimate of abundance. Calling varies greatly with weather conditions. Calling indices will also vary between observers. Results from the evaluation of methods and data quality showed that volunteers were very reliable in their abilities to identify species by their calls, but there was variability in abundance estimation (Genet and Sargent 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Western Toad Taxonomy Description
    WESTERN TOAD TAXONOMY Scientific name: Bufo boreas (Baird and Girard, 1852) Common name: Western toad Family: Bufonidae Taxonomic comments: Hybridizes with the red-spotted toad (Bufo punctatus) at Darwin Falls, Inyo County, California, and sometimes with Canadian toad (B. hemiophrys) in central Alberta. B. nelsoni was formerly included in this species. Molecular data indicate that B.exsul is phylogenetically nested within B. canorus; further data are needed to determine whether B. exsul should be subsumed with B. canorus (Shaffer et al. 2000). "Stephens (2001) examined mitochondrial DNA from 8 Yosemite toads (selected from the samples examined by Shaffer et al. (2000) to represent the range of variability found in that study) and 173 western toads. Stephens' data indicate that Bufo in the Sierra Nevada occur in northern and southern evolutionary groups, each of which include both Yosemite and western toads (i.e., toads of both species are more closely related to each other within a group than they are to members of their own species in the other group). Further genetic analysis of Yosemite toads sampled from throughout their range, and from other toad species surrounding their range is needed to fully understand the evolutionary history and appropriate taxonomic status of the Yosemite toad." (USFWS 2002). DESCRIPTION Basic description: A toad. General description: A chunky, short-legged, warty amphibian with dominant parotoid glands at the back of the head and a conspicuous light-colored stripe running down the middle of the back. Coloration varies from brown, green to gray above and white with dark mottling below. Females are usually larger, more blotched, and have rougher skin than males (Hodge 1976, MacDonald 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of the Herpetofaunal Assemblage in the Douglas-Fir/Hardwood Forests of Northwestern California and Southwestern Oregon
    The Structure of the Herpetofaunal Assemblage in the Douglas-Fir/Hardwood Forests of Northwestern California and Southwestern Oregon Hartwell H. Welsh, Jr., and Amy J. Lind Authors structural components associated with older forests were the best predictors of increased numbers of salamanders. Anal- HARTWELL H. WELSH, JR., and AMY J. LIND are wild- yses of microhabitat associations indicated that large, well- life biologists, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Serv- decayed logs were the most heavily used woody debris, ice, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, though use of particular size- and decay-classes varied Arcata, California 95521. among salamander species. Abstract Harvesting forests without immediately affecting herpe- Terrestrial and aquatic herpetofauna were sampled by three tofauna is probably not possible; however, strategies can be methods, time-constrained searches, pitfall traps, and area- developed to minimize long-term adverse effects. We pro- constrained searches from 1984 to 1986 in northwestern vide a summary of management recommendations designed California and southwestern Oregon. The 54 terrestrial and to assure long-term viablity of herpetofauna in areas subject 39 aquatic study sites were in Douglas-fir/hardwood forest to logging. stands that ranged in age from 30 to 560 years. Results of these surveys are presented in terms of species richness, Introduction equitability, relative abundance, relative biomass, and Old-growth forests are a unique and complex ecosystem macrohabitat and microhabitat associations. where many life forms occur in numbers disproportionate to their occurrence in other parts of their range (Thomas and Although species richness did not differ among forest age- others 1988), but the nature of the ecological dependencies classes, the composition of the herpetofauna was notably (Ruggiero and others 1988) between these species and the different.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprinodon Nevadensis Mionectes Ash Meadows Amargosa Pupfish
    Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfsh Cyprinodon nevadensis mionectes WAP 2012 species due to impacts from introduced detrimental aquatc species, habitat degradaton, and federal endangered status. Agency Status NV Natural Heritage G2T2S2 USFWS LE BLM-NV Sensitve State Prot Threatened Fish NAC 503.065.3 CCVI Presumed Stable TREND: Trend is stable to increasing with contnued on-going restoraton actvites. DISTRIBUTION: Springs and associated springbrooks, outlow stream systems and terminal marshes within Ash Meadows Natonal Wildlife Refuge, Nye Co., NV. GENERAL HABITAT AND LIFE HISTORY: This species is isolated to warm springs and outlows in Ash Meadows NWR including Point of Rocks, Crystal Springs, and the Carson Slough drainage. Pupfshes feed generally on substrate; feeding territories are ofen defended by pupfshes. Diet consists of mainly algae and detritus however, aquatc insects, crustaceans, snails and eggs are also consumed. Spawning actvity is typically from February to September and in some cases year round. Males defend territories vigorously during breeding season (Soltz and Naiman 1978). In warm springs, fsh may reach sexual maturity in 4-6 weeks. Reproducton variable: in springs, pupfsh breed throughout the year, may have 8-10 generatons/year; in streams, breeds in spring and summer, 2-3 generatons/year (Moyle 1976). In springs, males establish territories over sites suitable for ovipositon. Short generaton tme allows small populatons to be viable. Young adults typically comprise most of the biomass of a populaton. Compared to other C. nevadensis subspecies, this pupfsh has a short deep body and long head with typically low fn ray and scale counts (Soltz and Naiman 1978). CONSERVATION CHALLENGES: Being previously threatened by agricultural use of the area (loss and degradaton of habitat resultng from water diversion and pumping) and by impending residental development, the TNC purchased property, which later became the Ash Meadows NWR.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Predatory and Energetic Relations of Woodpeckers to the Engela~N
    DISSERTATION PREDATORY AND ENERGETIC RELATIONS OF WOODPECKERS TO THE ENGELA~N SPRUCE BEETLE Submitted by James Ray Koplin In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado June, 1967 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY June 1967 IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE DISSERTATION PREPARED BY ---- JAMES RAY KOPLIN ENTITLED PREDATORY AND ENERGETIC RELATIONS OF V\UODPECKERS TO THE ENGELMANN SPRUCE BEETLE BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIRE~ffiNT FOR THE DEGREE OF OOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. Committee £Q Graduate Work Major Professor Examination Satisfactory Chairman Permission to publish this dissertation or any part of it must be obtained from the Dean of the Graduate School. ii Abstract of Dissertation PREDATORY AND ENERGETIC RELATIONS OF WOODPECKERS TO THE ENGELMANN SPRUCE BEETLE A general theory of the population dynamics of predator­ prey systems was developed from a survey of pertinent literature. According to the theory, populations of simplified predator-prey systems fluctuate wildly and periodically. Complicating factors dampen the amplitude of the population fluctuations and thus exert a stabilizing influence on the systems. The predator-prey system between the Northern Three-toed, Hairy and Downy Woodpeckers, and the Engelmann spruce beetle was chosen for an investigation of the population dynamics of a natural predator-prey system. The population densities of several species of bark beetles attracted to trees killed and damaged by a fire on the study area in Northern Colorado, increased to levels that attracted the feeding attention of the woodpeckers. The numerical response of the woodpeckers to prey density was graded, that of the Northern Three-toed Woodpecker was the most pronounced and that of the Downy Woodpecker was the least pronounced.
    [Show full text]