DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Religious Disputation in England, 1558-1626

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Religious Disputation in England, 1558-1626 ‘DAYES OF GALL AND WORMWOOD’: PUBLIC RELIGIOUS DISPUTATION IN ENGLAND, 1558-1626 JOSHUA MARK RODDA, BA (Hons), MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy JULY 2012 Attestation I am aware of and understand the university’s policy on plagiarism. I further certify that this thesis represents work undertaken by me during my period of study at the University of Nottingham. Signed _______________________________________ Date _______________ Abstract This study examines a form of religious debate that saw Catholic priests and ministers across the reformed spectrum arguing in direct opposition to one another, and drawing on long- standing academic forms and intellectual ideals in doing so. Public religious disputation is first defined and placed in its religious, cultural and intellectual context, alongside formal disputation in the universities, printed controversy, literary dialogue and other manifestations of discourse and debate. The structures, tropes and tactics of the formal, academic process – as used in public or ‘professional’ controversial debate – are then detailed, in order to give a more precise definition, and a framework for the analysis of individual events. The chapters following this move chronologically from the accession of Elizabeth I and the 1559 Westminster conference to the aftermath of the death of James and the 1626 debate at York House. Drawing on the trends discussed in the first chapter and the procedures detailed in the second, these sections place individual disputations in their immediate context; examining the use and restriction of public religious debate by state and church authorities, the impact academic forms could have upon public, controversial disputation, the interplay between faith and human learning on display and the changing perceptions of the practice as political, religious and cultural conditions developed through the period. The aim of this study is to assert the significance of public religious disputation, and accounts thereof, as something more than a simple ‘variety’ of religious controversy or polemic. Its formal structures and direct interactions shed light on Reformation and post-Reformation religious arguments; but its structures and ideals also demonstrate a shared, fundamental mode of discourse and competition underlying those arguments. These encounters, and the accounts they produced, are not just examples of partisan polemic – they are potentially invaluable tools for the religious and cultural historian. i ii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been completed without the generous support of the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council, to whom acknowledgement and thanks must be given from the outset. I can only hope this work lives up to their faith in my project and potential. I am further indebted to my supervisor, Dr. Julia Merritt, for her encouragement, support and guidance through the preparation and writing of this study. Julia’s diligent attention to my work and invariably thought-provoking comments and feedback have been invaluable from the beginning. Thanks must also go to those historians and other scholars – professional and postgraduate – who have allowed me to discuss my topic with them, and those who have attended my conference and seminar papers relating to it, whose interest, feedback and choice questions have been a vital source of energy. I must also thank my family and friends for their unwavering support these past three and half years, for glancing at the occasional draft chapter, and, quite simply, for their existence. Your role might have been less tangible, but this thesis – and its author – would be nothing without you. iii iv Conventions Original spellings and punctuation have been followed throughout. Where clarity has forced a change, it is marked with brackets: [ ] Abbreviations HMC Historical Manuscripts Commission ODNB Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v vi Contents Abstract i Acknowledgements iii Conventions v Contents vii Introduction 1 Chapter One: The Culture of Controversy 12 Academic Disputation 13 Intellectual and Educational Developments 16 Logic and Rhetoric 19 The Universities in Religious Discourse 23 Literary Discourse 25 Religious Controversy: Written Polemic 27 Religious Controversy: Public Disputation 31 Chapter Two: The Disputation Process 37 The Fundamentals: Opponent, Respondent, Moderator and Question 39 Arguments and Authorities: Logic Form, Scripture and the Fathers 45 Tactics: Attack, Defence and Use of the Audience 56 Practical Considerations 61 Notes, Written Answers and the Production of Accounts 64 Adopt, Adapt and Invoke: the Departure from Academic Disputation 71 Chapter Three: Disputation Exploited, 1558-1581 75 The Examination of Catholics 76 The Westminster Conference 81 William Fulke at Wisbech 85 Disputations with Campion 90 vii Chapter Four: New Opponents, 1582-1603 109 John Rainolds and John Hart 111 The Lambeth Conference 124 The Examination of Separatists and Nonconformists 132 Conversion and Reclamation 141 James Ussher and Henry Fitzsimon 146 The Spread of Elizabethan Religious Debate 148 Chapter Five: Disputation Distinguished, 1604-1620 151 The Hampton Court Conference 152 Protestant Demands and Godly Debate 165 Conference and Disputation with Catholics 174 Chapter Six: The Fisher Controversies, 1621-1625 189 Prelude: Daniel Featley and George Musket 191 Arguments before the Countess of Buckingham 198 Disputations with Jesuits 213 Coda: Featley and Fisher 222 Solomon Sleeps 236 Conclusions 239 Gall and Wormwood? 246 Bibliography 259 viii Introduction ‘I never knew good come by disputation.’1 This thesis describes an aspect of post-Reformation controversy that has fallen between fields of inquiry. Amid the mass of written polemic generated by controversialists in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century England, there were more immediate engagements: face-to-face debates, that fuelled and complemented the storm of proselytising and denunciation in print. Spurred on by classical ideals and biblical imperatives, and encouraged by prior historical examples, divines throughout the period issued calls for scholarly, often public, disputation as a means of addressing religious questions, and the resulting events – ranging from smaller encounters to occasions like the Hampton Court conference of 1604 – formed milestones in controversy. The Reformation had, in the words of Thomas McCoog, been ‘punctuated’ with challenges to dispute; indeed, in some contemporary minds, its changes were ‘propelled’ by disputation.2 Direct religious argument was regarded as distinct from written controversy; a view reflected in the manner in which it was reported and described, and in the histories of the practice that appeared through the seventeenth century.3 In their structures and ideals, these events offer a fascinating window into the period’s divisions, and provide an opportunity for those seeking a 1 John Feckenham, in William Fulke, A True Reporte of a Conference had betwixt Doctour Fulke, and the Papists, Being at Wisbiche Castle (London, 1581), sig. B2v. 2 Thomas M. McCoog, ‘‘Playing the Champion’: The Role of Disputation in the Jesuit Mission’, in Thomas M. McCoog (ed.), The Reckoned Expense: Edmund Campion and the Early English Jesuits (Oxford, 1996), p. 119; and the view of Francis Savage, in Joseph Puterbaugh, ‘“Your selfe be judge and answer your selfe”: Formation of Protestant Identity in A Conference Betwixt a Mother a Devout Recusant and Her Sonne a Zealous Protestant’, The Sixteenth Century Journal, 31 (2000), p. 423. 3 In 1604, the Jesuit Robert Persons compared Augustine’s disputations with those fuelling the Reformation, and in 1658, the clergyman John Ley, spurred on by an encounter between fellow ministers, produced a detailed history, moving from a biblical dispute between two angels and the Devil through the continental Reformation to more immediate events: N. D., A Review of Ten Publike Disputations (St Omer, 1604), passim; John Ley, A Discourse of Disputations Chiefly Concerning Matters of Religion (London, 1658), esp. pp. 31-47. For recent emphasis on the role of controversy in shaping ideas about the past, see Thomas Freeman, ‘The Power of Polemic: Catholic Responses to the Calendar in Foxe’s ‘Book of Martyrs’, The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 61 (2010), pp. 475-6, 495. 1 combined Catholic and reformed post-Reformation narrative. Their procedures describe a shared intellectual arena, allowing for broad, cross-confessional analysis.4 Thus, public religious disputations in this period call for a dedicated study. They have not been neglected entirely, but as events they are often considered in isolation; their printed results treated as but one element of that mass of pamphlet controversy to which, even in the seventeenth century, there appeared to be ‘no end’.5 In order to address this gap, this thesis will concentrate on the mechanics, implications and perception of the practice. As will be discussed below, ‘public’ is here taken in opposition to ‘academic’, to denote events taking place beyond the educational sphere: those public in purpose as well as performance (or through the distribution of accounts). The period of focus is from the accession of Elizabeth I to the immediate aftermath of James’ death, through which time a clear arc – in application and perception – can be traced in public religious disputation. These encounters united two distinct phenomena: academic disputation, which was a staple of university education and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paul's Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640
    Paul’s Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640 Studies in the History of Christian Traditions General Editor Robert J. Bast Knoxville, Tennessee In cooperation with Paul C.H. Lim, Nashville, Tennessee Eric Saak, Liverpool Christine Shepardson, Knoxville, Tennessee Brian Tierney, Ithaca, New York Arjo Vanderjagt, Groningen John Van Engen, Notre Dame, Indiana Founding Editor Heiko A. Oberman† VOLUME 171 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/shct Paul’s Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640 Edited by Torrance Kirby P.G. Stanwood LEIDEN • BOSTON 2014 Cover illustration and Frontispiece: ‘A sermon preached in the presence of King James I at Paul’s Cross’. The Society of Antiquaries’ diptych commissioned by Henry Farley in 1616 and painted by John Gipkyn. Scharf XLIII, Way/Museum No. 304, Burlington House, London. By kind permission of the Society of Antiquaries, London. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Paul’s Cross and the culture of persuasion in England, 1520-1640 / edited by Torrance Kirby, P.G. Stanwood. pages cm. -- (Studies in the history of Christian traditions, ISSN 1573-5664 ; VOLUME 171) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-24227-2 (hardback : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-90-04-26281-2 (e-book) 1. Preaching-- England--London--History--16th century. 2. Preaching--England--London--History--17th century. 3. Sermons, English--16th century. 4. Sermons, English--17th century. 5. St. Paul’s Cathedral (London, England) 6. London (England)--Church history--16th century. 7. London (England)--Church history-- 17th century. I. Kirby, W. J.
    [Show full text]
  • JAMES USSHER Copyright Material: Irish Manuscripts Commission
    U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page i The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER Copyright material: Irish Manuscripts Commission Commission Manuscripts Irish material: Copyright U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iii The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER 1600–1656 V O L U M E I I I 1640–1656 Commission Letters no. 475–680 editedManuscripts by Elizabethanne Boran Irish with Latin and Greek translations by David Money material: Copyright IRISH MANUSCRIPTS COMMISSION 2015 U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iv For Gertie, Orla and Rosemary — one each. Published by Irish Manuscripts Commission 45 Merrion Square Dublin 2 Ireland www.irishmanuscripts.ie Commission Copyright © Irish Manuscripts Commission 2015 Elizabethanne Boran has asserted her right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000, Section 107. Manuscripts ISBN 978-1-874280-89-7 (3 volume set) Irish No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher. The index was completed with the support of the Arts andmaterial: Social Sciences Benefaction Fund, Trinity College, Dublin. Copyright Typeset by December Publications in Adobe Garamond and Times New Roman Printed by Brunswick Press Index prepared by Steve Flanders U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page v S E R I E S C O N T E N T S V O L U M E I Abbreviations xxv Acknowledgements xxix Introduction xxxi Correspondence of James Ussher: Letters no.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv2w736 Author Harkins, Robert Lee Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Title Page
    “Singing by Course” and the Politics of Worship in the Church of England, c1560–1640 By James Campbell Nelson Apgar A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Music in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Davitt Moroney, Chair Professor James Davies Professor Diego Pirillo Spring 2018 Abstract “Singing by Course” and the Politics of Worship in the Church of England, c1560–1640 by James Campbell Nelson Apgar Doctor of Philosophy in Music University of California, Berkeley Professor Davitt Moroney, Chair “Singing by course” was both a product of and a rhetorical tool within the religious discourses of post-Reformation England. Attached to a variety of ostensibly distinct practices, from choirs singing alternatim to congregations praying responsively, it was used to advance a variety of partisan agendas regarding performance and sound within the services of the English Church. This dissertation examines discourses of public worship that were conducted around and through “singing by course,” treating it as a linguistic and conceptual node within broader networks of contemporary religious debate. I thus attend less to the history of the vocal practices to which “by course” and similar descriptions were applied than to the polemical dynamics of these applications. Discussions of these terms and practices slipped both horizontally, to other matters of ritual practice, and vertically, to larger topics or frameworks such as the nature of the Christian Church, the production of piety, and the roles of sound and performance in corporate prayer. Through consideration of these issues, “singing by course” emerges as a rhetorical, political, and theological construction, one that circulated according to changing historical conditions and to the interests of various ecclesiastical constituencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Congregational History Society Magazine
    ISSN 9B?>–?;<> Congregational History Society Magazine Volume ? Number < Spring ;9:: ISSN 0965–6235 THE CONGREGATIONAL HISTORY SOCIETY MAGAZINE Volume E No B Spring A?@@ Contents Editorial 106 News and Views 106 Correspondence 107 The Hampton Court Conference, the King James Version 108 and the Separatists Alan Argent Locals and Cosmopolitans: Congregational Pastors 124 in Edwardian Hampshire Roger Ottewill The Evangelical Union Academy 138 W D McNaughton Reviews 144 Congregational History Society Magazine, Vol. 6, No 3, 2011 105 EDITORIAL In this issue Roger Ottewill conducts readers to Edwardian Hampshire to meet the county’s Congregational pastors, both local, cosmo-local and cosmopolitan (all terms he explains), among whom we find the influential Welsh wizard, J D Jones of Bournemouth, called “the arch-wangler of Nonconformity” by David Lloyd George, who knew a thing or two about wangling. We travel north of the border to study that understated contribution to Scottish Congregationalism, the Evangelical Union, explicitly through its academy. Lastly, like many others in 2011, we turn aside to mark the 400th anniversary of the King James Version of the Bible. In this magazine, our examination of this Jacobean masterpiece involves a consideration of its origins, amid the demands for further reform of the established church, and the growth of those forerunners of Congregationalism, the English separatists. NEWS AND VIEWS We were saddened to learn of the death of John Taylor, for many years the editor of the Transactions of the Congregational Historical Society and, after 1972, of its successor and our sister journal, the Journal of the United Reformed Church History Society .
    [Show full text]
  • Adam Winthrop's Library Draft: 30 January 96; Not to Be Quoted Or Cited
    Adam Winthrop's Library draft: 30 January 96; Not to be quoted or cited Adam Winthrop (1548-1623) was the father of John Winthrop (1588-1649), the first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. He was the youngest son of Adam Winthrop (1498-1562), Master of the Clothworkers. Born in London in 1548, he probably spent some of his youth at Groton, in Suffolk, his father having purchased the former monastic manor in 1544 and taken up residence there in around 1552 . The elder Adam Winthrop died in 1562 and his widow, young Adam's mother, married William Mildmay. Young Adam inherited little land from his father. At the time he was enrolled in a private grammar school run by John Dawes in Ipswich. In 1567 he matriculated fellow commoner at Magdalene, Cambridge where he stayed for a few years, making friendships with John Still, John Knewstub, and Henry Sandes among others. In 1574 Adam married Alice Still and around then presumably began legal studies at the Inns of Court. In 1575 the fellows of St John's College, where John Still was Master, appointed Adam steward of the college's Kentish manors. In 1577 his wife Alice died and two years later he married Anne Browne, son of Henry Browne, former clergyman of Groton. In 1584 Adam was called to the outer bar of the Inner Temple following a recommendation to the benchers from Robert Dudley, the earl of Leicester. He was one of the signatories of a declaration of loyalty to the Queen signed by the barristers of the Inner Temple in 1585.
    [Show full text]
  • EB WARD Diary
    THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE Transcribed and prepared by Dr. M.M. Knappen, Professor of English History, University of Chicago. Edited by John W. Cowart Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE. Copyright © 2007 by John W. Cowart. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America by Lulu Press. Apart from reasonable fair use practices, no part of this book’s text may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. For information address Bluefish Books, 2805 Ernest St., Jacksonville, Florida, 32205. Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data has been applied for. Lulu Press # 1009823. Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info SAMUEL WARD 1572 — 1643 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION …………………………………..…. 1 THE TWO SAMUEL WARDS……………………. …... 13 SAMUEL WARD’S LISTIING IN THE DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY…. …. 17 DR. M.M. KNAPPEN’S PREFACE ………. …………. 21 THE PURITAN CHARACTER IN THE DIARY. ….. 27 DR. KNAPPEN’S LIFE OF SAMUEL WARD …. …... 43 THE DIARY TEXT …………………………….……… 59 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ DEDICATION TO THE KING……………………………………….… 97 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ PREFACE TO BIBLE READERS ………………………………………….….. 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………….…….. 129 INTRODUCTION by John W. Cowart amuel Ward, a moderate Puritan minister, lived from 1572 to S1643. His life spanned from the reign of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, through that of King James. and into the days of Charles I. Surviving pages of Ward’s dated diary entries run from May 11, 1595, to July 1, 1632.
    [Show full text]
  • The King James Bible
    Chap. iiii. The Coming Forth of the King James Bible Lincoln H. Blumell and David M. Whitchurch hen Queen Elizabeth I died on March 24, 1603, she left behind a nation rife with religious tensions.1 The queen had managed to govern for a lengthy period of almost half a century, during which time England had become a genuine international power, in part due to the stabil- ity Elizabeth’s reign afforded. YetE lizabeth’s preference for Protestantism over Catholicism frequently put her and her country in a very precarious situation.2 She had come to power in November 1558 in the aftermath of the disastrous rule of Mary I, who had sought to repair the relation- ship with Rome that her father, King Henry VIII, had effectively severed with his founding of the Church of England in 1532. As part of Mary’s pro-Catholic policies, she initiated a series of persecutions against various Protestants and other notable religious reformers in England that cumu- latively resulted in the deaths of about three hundred individuals, which subsequently earned her the nickname “Bloody Mary.”3 John Rogers, friend of William Tyndale and publisher of the Thomas Matthew Bible, was the first of her victims. For the most part, Elizabeth was able to maintain re- ligious stability for much of her reign through a couple of compromises that offered something to both Protestants and Catholics alike, or so she thought.4 However, notwithstanding her best efforts, she could not satisfy both groups. Toward the end of her life, with the emergence of Puritanism, there was a growing sense among select quarters of Protestant society Lincoln H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earl of Essex's Chaplain: Rev. Abdias Assheton
    The Earl of Essex’s chaplain: Rev. Abdias Assheton Anne Falloon, Middleton Archaeological Society 1 Introduction Abdias Assheton (1563-1633) was a member of Middleton’s manorial family who rose to some prominence in the final years of Elizabeth I’s reign. A Protestant with strong Puritan leanings, as an academic and preacher he sought all his answers not from centuries old tradition as his Catholic forebears had done, but directly from a deep reading of the bible. In the 1590’s his approach to thinking through religious and moral choices using scripture attracted the attention of the greatest man in England. This is the story of the controversial relationship between Essex and the influential chaplain he called his ‘little man’, Abdias Assheton. 2 The Asshetons and religion In the mid 16th century, members of the Assheton 1 family were faced with the decision everyone in the country had to consider: to accept the new state religion or adhere to the old one. There were costs attached to remaining faithful. Staunch Catholics felt they were risking their souls without the rituals of confessing to a priest and receiving the actual body and blood of Christ. As the century progressed, there were increasing worldly costs of not conforming in Elizabeth’s England. Catholic recusants who refused to attend church or take communion were heavily fined. Noble and gentry families could afford to pay, but only the wealthiest were able to continue losing income indefinitely. The majority of people opted for safety: committed Anglican Protestants conformed with enthusiasm, but others, the Calvinists and Puritans, were still nursing the ambition of purifying the English church still further.
    [Show full text]
  • How English Baptists Changed the Early Modern Toleration Debate
    RADICALLY [IN]TOLERANT: HOW ENGLISH BAPTISTS CHANGED THE EARLY MODERN TOLERATION DEBATE Caleb Morell Dr. Amy Leonard Dr. Jo Ann Moran Cruz This research was undertaken under the auspices of Georgetown University and was submitted in partial fulfillment for Honors in History at Georgetown University. MAY 2016 I give permission to Lauinger Library to make this thesis available to the public. ABSTRACT The argument of this thesis is that the contrasting visions of church, state, and religious toleration among the Presbyterians, Independents, and Baptists in seventeenth-century England, can best be explained only in terms of their differences over Covenant Theology. That is, their disagreements on the ecclesiological and political levels were rooted in more fundamental disagreements over the nature of and relationship between the biblical covenants. The Baptists developed a Covenant Theology that diverged from the dominant Reformed model of the time in order to justify their practice of believer’s baptism. This precluded the possibility of a national church by making baptism, upon profession of faith, the chief pre- requisite for inclusion in the covenant community of the church. Church membership would be conferred not upon birth but re-birth, thereby severing the links between infant baptism, church membership, and the nation. Furthermore, Baptist Covenant Theology undermined the dominating arguments for state-sponsored religious persecution, which relied upon Old Testament precedents and the laws given to kings of Israel. These practices, the Baptists argued, solely applied to Israel in the Old Testament in a unique way that was not applicable to any other nation. Rather in the New Testament age, Christ has willed for his kingdom to go forth not by the power of the sword but through the preaching of the Word.
    [Show full text]
  • Tstog of Or 6Ttr4* Anor of Ratigan
    Thank you for buying from Flatcapsandbonnets.com Click here to revisit THE • tstog of Or 6ttr4* anor of ratigan IN THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER. BY THE HONOURABLE AND REVEREND GEORGE T. 0. BRIDGEMAN, Rotor of Wigan, Honorary Canon of Liverpool, and Chaplain in Ordinary to the Queen. (AUTHOR OF "A HISTORY OF THE PRINCES OF SOUTH WALES," ETC.) PART II. PRINTEDwww.flatcapsandbonnets.com FOR THE CH 1.71'HAM SOCIETY. 1889. Thank you for buying from Flatcapsandbonnets.com Click here to revisit 'tam of die cpurcl) ant) manor of Etligatt. PART II. OHN BRIDGEMAN was admitted to the rectory of Wigan on the 21st of January, 1615-16. JHe was the eldest son of Mr. Thomas Bridgeman of Greenway, otherwise called Spyre Park, near Exeter, in the county of Devon, and grandson of Mr. Edward Bridgeman, sheriff of the city and county of Exeter for the year 1562-3.1 John Bridgeman was born at Exeter, in Cookrow Street, and christened at the church of St. Petrok's in that city, in the paro- chial register of which is the following entry : " the seconde of November, A.D. 1597, John Bridgman, the son of Thomas Bridgman, was baptized." '1 Bishop John Bridgeman is rightly described by Sir Peter Leycester as the son of Mr. Thomas Bridgeman of Greenway, though Ormerod, in his History of Cheshire, who takes Leycester's Historical Antiquities as the groundwork for his History, erro- neously calls him the son of Edward Bridgeman, and Ormerod's mistake has been repeated by his later editor (Helsby's ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Record Index 1922-1938 Images Can Be Accessed in the Indiana Room
    Marriage Record Index 1922-1938 Images can be accessed in the Indiana Room. Call (812)949-3527 for more information. Groom Bride Marriage Date Image Aaron, Elza Antle, Marion 8/12/1928 026-048 Abbott, Charles Ruby, Hallie June 8/19/1935 030-580 Abbott, Elmer Beach, Hazel 12/9/1922 022-243 Abbott, Leonard H. Robinson, Berta 4/30/1926 024-324 Abel, Oscar C. Ringle, Alice M. 1/11/1930 027-067 Abell, Lawrence A. Childers, Velva 4/28/1930 027-154 Abell, Steve Blakeman, Mary Elizabeth 12/12/1928 026-207 Abernathy, Pete B. Scholl, Lorena 10/15/1926 024-533 Abram, Howard Henry Abram, Elizabeth F. 3/24/1934 029-414 Absher, Roy Elgin Turner, Georgia Lillian 4/17/1926 024-311 Ackerman, Emil Becht, Martha 10/18/1927 025-380 Acton, Dewey Baker, Mary Cathrine 3/17/1923 022-340 Adam, Herman Glen Harpe, Mary Allia 4/11/1936 031-273 Adam, Herman Glenn Hinton, Esther 8/13/1927 025-282 Adams, Adelbert Pope, Thelma 7/14/1927 025-255 Adams, Ancil Logan, Jr. Eiler, Lillian Mae 4/8/1933 028-570 Adams, Cecil A. Johnson, Mary E. 12/21/1923 022-706 Adams, Crozier E. Sparks, Sarah 4/1/1936 031-250 Adams, Earl Snook, Charlotte 1/5/1935 030-250 Adams, Harry Meyer, Lillian M. 10/21/1927 025-376 Adams, Herman Glen Smith, Hazel Irene 2/28/1925 023-502 Adams, James O. Hallet, Louise M. 4/3/1931 027-476 Adams, Lloyd Kirsch, Madge 6/7/1932 028-274 Adams, Robert A.
    [Show full text]