<<

A synthetic note about the phenomenon of the Central-Asian Early Age “painted ware cultures” (2nd -1st millennium B.C.) Johanna Lhuillier

To cite this version:

Johanna Lhuillier. A synthetic note about the phenomenon of the Central-Asian Early “painted ware cultures” (2nd -1st millennium B.C.). Bulletin of the International Institute of Cen- tral Asian Studies, International Institute for Central Asian Studies () 2011, 13, pp.9-20. ￿halshs-01534935￿

HAL Id: halshs-01534935 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01534935 Submitted on 8 Jun 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés.

ISSN 1694-5794

BECTH~K M~UA~ BULLETIN OF IICAS ~3,lJ,aH~e Me>K,O,yHapO,lJ,Horo V1HcT~TyTa publication of the International Institute WeHTpaJl bHOa3~aTCK~X ~CCJle,lJ,OBa H~ 171 for Central Asian Studies (CaMapKaH,lJ,) (Samarkand)

BblnYCK 13, 2011 VOLUME 13, 2011

PeAaK~1.10HHa~ KOnnerl.1~: Editorial board: W.M. MycTacpaeB (omeem. peàaKmop), Sh.M. Mustafayev, (editor-in-chief), K.M. 5al71naKoB, W. n~,lJ,aeB , p. Ha3apoB, K.M. Baipakov, Sh. Pidayev, R. Nazarov, X .C. n~ , M. KaJlnaKJlbl , .M. ACa,lJ,OB, H.S. Lee, M . Kalpakli, F.M. Asadov, 5. AMaH6aeBa, M. Awpacp XaH, B. Amanbaeva, M . Ashraf Khan, M .X. XaH~ M .H. Khani

nepesoA Ha aHrnI.1HCKI.1H: Translated into English: C. ra3~eB S. Gaziyev

KOMnbtoTepHa~ sepCTKa 1.1 AI.13aHH: Computer design: A. K)Jl,lJ,aWeB A. Yuldashev

AApec: Address: Me>K,O,yHapO,lJ,Hbll71 V1HCT~TyT International Institute WeHTpaJlbHOa3~aTCK~X ~CCJle,lJ,OBaH~171 for Central Asian Studies YH~Bepc~TeTcK~171 6yJlbBap, 19 19, University Boulevard str. , 140129, 140129, CaMapKaH,lJ" Y36eK~cTaH Samarkand, TeJl.: (99866) 235 1520; 235 1522; Tel.: (99866) 235 1520; 235 1522 aKc:(998-66) 235 15 59 Fax: (998-66) 235 1559; E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Web-site: www.unesco-iicas.org Web-site: www.unesco-iicas.org

The authors are responsible for the choice and the presentation of AsmOJ1l" Hecytn omsemcmBeHHOemf> 3a B"wop Unpeàocma&A.eHue the facts contained in this edition and for the opinions expressed g,arcmoB U MHeHUü, coiJqnKa~UXQI B 3mOM wàaHUU U He therein, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not 8blptVlCalO~UX uiJeu IOHECKO. 0603Ha'leHUJI U Mamepua.w, commit the organization. Nor do they the expression of any npeàemalMeHHNe B fCHUZe, He 3all:.UOflalOm B ce6e MHeHUJI opinions as the part ofUNESCO concerningthe legal status ofany IOHECKO OmHOCUme.AJ>HO AeZa.UoHOZO cmamyca tcalCOu-AU6o country, territory, city or area or ofits authoritïes, or concerningthe empaH"" meppumopuu, zopoiJa UAU30HN /l.4.UJIHUJI, zpaHUf4. delimitation ofits frontier or boundaries.

© Me>KAyHapoAHblH ~HCTI.1TyT © International Institute UeHTpanbHOa31.1aTCKI.1X I.1ccneAOSaHI.1H, for Central Asian Studies, 2011 2011

cJ>omo Ha 06JlO:J/cKe: B op oma AJUIM2UpU (16732., n aJURmllUK m e.MypuôcKoU apxumeKmypbl 6 IIaKucmalle, 2. JIaxop)

Image on the co ver: The A lamgiri Gate (1673, Monument Of Temurid architecture in Pakistan, Lahore) COAEP)KAHIŒ

Aoaxyaoe6a A. « MHKPOCOQHo.Ao.rIDI» QeHTpaAbHo.H A3HH B cpo.To.Ao.KYMeHTax xx B. 3 AIOUAbe )1(. KOMlIAeKCHble 3aMeTKH 0. cpeHo.MeHe «KYAbTYP paCnHCHo.H KepaMHKH» paHHero. )I(eAe3Ho.ro. BeKa B l4eH1'pélAbHo.H A3HH (11-1 TbICH'leAeTIDI Ao. H. 3.) 9 ACaH06 T. K BOnpOCy 0 KyAbTypHo.-Xo.3:SlHCTBeHHo.H TeppHTo.pHH H 3THo.Co.qHaAbHo.H CTpYKType Ko.qeBo.ro. KhlpfbI3CKOrO o.6xqeCTBa 21 illuxue6aC. HeCHMH H y36eKCKaJl KAaCC~eCKaJl no.33ID1 B 3no.xy TeMYPHAo.B (XV-XVI BB.) 28 E~eMaH06a C. o COBpeMeHHo.M Co.CTo.SlHHH H H3yqeHHH TPaAHQHo.HHo.H Ka3axcKo.H MY3bIKaAbHo.H KYAbTYPbI 46 Aeomap (j). KapaKaAIlaKCKHe 6apAbI Y36eKHCTaHa: 3AeMeHTbI MY3bIKaAbHo.H 3CTeTHKH 58

KOHtJ)EPEHllHH BTOpaJl BCTpeqa Ko.o.PAHHaQHo.HHo.ro. Ko.MHTeTa no. CepHHHo.H Ho.MHHaQHH IIIeAKo.Bo.ro. nyTH B cnHCo.K BceMHpHoro. HaCAeAIDI. Arnra6aTcKo.e Co.rAameHHe. 65 U CHTpaAbHOa3HaTCKaJl ceTeBaJl BCTPeqa no. Co.XpaHeHHIO HeMaTepHaAbHo.ro. KYAbTypHo.ro. HaCAeAHSl 68

HHtJ)OPMAQIUI 0 AEBTEAbHOCTH MHllAH TIoceIl\eHHe MI1QAH fAaBo.H IlpeACTaBHTeAbcTBa IOHECKO B DaHrKo.Ke 71

Y'lEHbIE QEHTPAAbHOH A3HH TIp0ecco.py .5IKo.By A6paMo.BHqy IIIepy - 80 AeT 72 CONTENTS

Dodkhudoeva L. "Microsociology" of reflected in photo documents of 20th century 3 J. Lhuillier A Synthetic note about the phenomenon of the Cetral-Asian early iron age "Painted ware cultures" (2nd_Pt millenium B.e.) 9 AsanovT. On the cultural and economic territory and ethno-social structure ofKyrgyz nomadic society 21 Shikhiyeva S. Nesimi and Uzbek classic poetry during the age ofTimurids (lSth_16th centuries) 28 Elemanova S. On a current state and study of the traditional Kazakh music culture 46 LeotarF. Karakalpak bards ofUzbekistan: elements of musical aesthetics 58

CONFERENCES The second meeting of the Coordinating committee on SeriaI nomination of the Road to the World Heritage List. Ashgabat Agreement 65 Central Asian networking meeting on the preservation of intangible cultural heritage 68

INFORMATION ON ACTIVITIES OF IICAS The visit to IICAS by the Head of UNESCO Office in Bangkok 71

SCHOLARSOFCENTRALAS~ Professor Y.A. Sher turned 80 72 BECTHMK MML1A11, BbIIIYCK 13, 2011 BULLETIN OF IICAS, VOLUME 13, 2011

KOMllAEKCHblE 3AMETKH 0 ~EHOMEHE «KYAbTYP PACIIIICHOH KEPAMIIKH» PAHHErO )l(EAE3HOrO BEKA B QEHTPAAbHOHA31I1I (11-1 TbIC.HqEAETIUI AO H. 3.)

A SYNTHETIC NOTE ABOUT THE PHENOMENON OF THE CENTRAL-ASIAN EARLY IRON AGE "PAINTEDWARE CULTURES" (2ND-IS™ILLENNIUMB.C.)

© 20 Il r. )I{. AloHAbe © 2011 J. Lhuillier IIapuJIC, cI>paH"fUJI Paris, France

I10cAe OKOH'laHillI 6poH30Boro BeKa AA5I U;eHTpaA.b­ After the end of the , the Central Asia HOH A3HH BpeMeHH paHHero :>KeAe3HOro BeKa, OKO­ is characterized during Early Iron Age, around 1500- AO 1500-1400/1000-900 rOAOB AO H. 3. [Francfort & 1400/1000-900 BCE [Francfort & Kuz'mina 1999] by Kuz'mina 1999] XapaKTepeH HAeOAOmqeCKHH rrepeBo­ major ideological upheavals throughout Central Asia. pOT. B 3TOT rrepHOA c~ecTByeT Macca KyAbTyp H3BecT­ In this period, a medley of cultures coexist known as HbIX KaK « KyAbTypbI pacrrHcHoH pyqHOH KepaMHKH» "handmade painted ware cultures" (fig. 1)I. AlI are (HM. 1) 1. Bee OHH rrpHHaMe:>KaT oceAAbIM KyAbTypaM, sedentary cultures, whose economy relies on agricul­ 'lMI 3KOHOMHKa OCHOBaHa Ha CeAbCKOM X03m1CTBe H ture and cattle rearing, and whose ceramics are mainly pa3BeAeHHH CKOTa, a KepaMH'IeCKHe H3AeAlUl B OCHOB­ handmade and sometimes painted. However, each cul­ HOM H3rOTOBAeHbl BpyqHYIO H B HeKOTopblX CAyqéUlX ture has its own specific material features. Currently dif­ paCKpameHbI. OAHaKO Ka:>KAaJI KyAbTypa HMeeT CBOH ferent groups have been identified in , in crrelwH'IeCKHe MaTepHaA.bHble rrpH3HaKH. B HaCTO.sI­ Margiana [Masson, 1959], in the foothills of the Kopet ~ee BpeM.sI pa3AH'IHbIe rpyrrrrbi 6blAH o6Hapy:>KeHbl B Dagh [Lecomte, 2007] and in the Turkmenabad oasis TypKMeHHCTaHe, B MapmaHe [MaccoH, 1959], y rrOA­ [Pilipko, 1979]; in the north-eastern region of Khoras­ HO:>KHH KorreTAara [Lecomte, 2007] H B TypKMeHa6aA­ an, in Iran [Venco Ricciardi, 1980]; in , in CKOM oa3Hee [IlHAHrrKo, 1979]; B ceBepo-BOCTOqHOH southern [Sarianidi, 1989]; in south-eastern rrpoBHHllHH XopacaH MpaHa [Venco Ricciardi, 1980]; B , in north-eastern Bactria [Vinogradova, Ra­ AraHHcTaHe, B IO:>KHOH EaKTpHH [CapHaHHAH, 1989]; nov & Filomonova, 2008]; in Uzbekistan, in north­ B IOrO-BOCTO'lHOM TaA:>KHKHCTaHe, B eeBepo-BOCTOqHOH western Bactria [Askarov & Al'baum, 1979; Rtveladze, EaKTpHH [BHHorpaAoBa, PaHOB H HAHMOHOBa, 2008]; 2007; Sagdullaev, 1987; Shajdullaev, 2000; Sverchkov B Y36eKHCTaHe, B eeBepO-3arraAHOH EaKTpHH [AcKapoB & Boroffka, 2007], in southern [Isamiddinov & H AAb6aYM, 1979; PTBeAaA3e, 2007; CarAYAAaeB, 1987; Khasanov, 2000] and in northern Sogdia [Rapin,2007], IIIaHAYAAaeB, 2000; CBepqKOB H EopoKa, 2007], B in Chach [Duke, 1982; Filanovich 1983, 2010]; in Us­ IO:>KHOM CorAe [MCaMHAAHHOB H XacaHoB, 2000] H B ce­ trushana [Beljajeva, 1991]; and finally in the BepHoM CorAe [Rapin, 2007], B qaqe [Duke, 1982; H­ valley in Uzbekistan [Zadneprovskij, 1962; Matbabaev, AaHOBH'l 1983, 2010]; B YCTpynraHe [EeA.sIeBa, 1991]; 1985] and in [Zadneprovskij, 1997]. H HaKOHell B epraHcKoH AOAHHe Y36eKHcTaHa [3aAHe­ rrpoBcKHH, 1962; MaT6aeB, 1985] H B KHprH3HH [3a­ MATERIALAND SOCIOECONOMIC AHerrpOBCKHH, 1997]. CHARACTERIZATION

MATEPHAAbILVl H CO~H03KOHOMH'lECKMl THE CORPUS UNDER STUDY XAPAKTEPHCTHKA A large corpus of firsthand data was examined, espe­ cially ceramics, from the major sites where French mis­ H3YIlAEMbIH MATEPHAA sions are currently working: the MAFOuz-Sogdiane at EblA rrpOaHaAH3HpOBaH 60AblllOH KOprryC rrepBoHa­ Koktepe and Afrasiab; the MAFOuz-Protohistoire at 'IaAbHblX CBeAeHHH, B oco6eHHocTH H3AeAlUl H3 KepaMH­ Dzharkutan and the MAFTur at Ulug-depe. Were also KH, C OCHOBHblX MeCT pacKorroK, rAe B AaHHoe BpeM.sI pa- studied other materials from Dzham-53 site, excavated 60TaIOT paHllY3CKHe 3KcrreAHllHH: MAFOuz-Sogdian B bythe Italo-Uzbekmission of Samarkand and from San­ KOKTerre HApaCHa6e; MAFOuz-Protohistoire B A:>Kap­ gir-tepe (MAFOuz-Sogdiane)2. This initial corpus was KyTaHe H MAFTur B YAyr-Aerre. EblAH TaK:>Ke H3yqeHbl then completed by the study of abundant mate rials from 9 AIOUAbe )1(. Lhuillier J.

Puc. 1. PaCnOAO'ICel-lUe "YAbmyp pacnuCl-lOu KepaMUKU Fig 1. Location ofpainted ware cultures ApyrHe MaTepHaAbI H3 A)I(aM-53, H3BAeqeHHbIe HTaAO­ more ancient but published or unpublished excavations y36eKcKoH 3KClleAHIJ;HeH H3 CaHrHp-Telle (MAFOuz­ from Kuchuk-tepe (A.A. Askarov's excavations, ceramic Sogdiane)2. 3TOT lIepBOHaqaAbHbIH MaTepHaA 6bIA 110- stored in the National Museum of and in the TOM AOIIOAHeH H3yqeHHeM MHOrOqHCAeHHbIX AaHHbIX H3 Termez museum), Dzharkutan (Sh. Shajdullaev's exca­ 60Aee ApeBHHX, HO y)l(e OIlHcaHHbIX AH60 HeOIlHcaHHbIX vations, ceramic stored in the Institute of Archaeology paCKOIIOK B KyqyK-Telle (pacKoIIKH A.A. ACKapoBa, Ke­ of Samarkand), Tuyabuguz (Kh.l. Duke's excavations, paMHqeCKHe H3AeAWI, xpaIDIIu;HeC51 B Hau;HOHaAbHOM ceramic stored in the Institute of Archaeology of Sa­ MY3ee B TarnKeHTe H B MY3ee TepMe3a), A)I(apKyTaHe markand) and sites of the , in Kyrgyzstan (pacKoIIKH III. IIIaHAYAAaeBa, KepaMHqeCKHe H3AeAWI, Ou.A. Zadneprovkij's excavations, ceramic stored in XpaH5lIIJ;HeC51 B l1HcTHTyTe apxeOAorHH B CaMapKaHAe), the Sulejman-Too Museum of History and Archaeology Ty516yry3e (pacKoIIKH X. 11. AIOKa, KepaMHqeCKHe H3Ae­ and in the museum) and in Uzbekistan Ou.A. Zad­ AWI xpaH5lIIJ;HeC51 B l1HcTHTyTe apxeOAorHH B CaMapKaH­ neprovkij's excavations, ceramic stored in the National Ae) H B MecTax pacKolloK qyCTCKOH KyAbTypbI B KHprH- museum of Tashkent and in the Registan museum of 3HH (pacKoIIKH IO. A. 3aAHellpoBcKoro, KepaMHqeCKHe Samarkand). AlI together, more than 8000 potsherds, H3AeAWI, xpaH5IIu;HeC51 B My3ee HCTOpHH CyAeHMaH-Too of which 7000 are unpublished, were examined. Un­ H B OmCKOM MY3ee) H B Y36eKHcTaHe (pacKoIIKH IO. A. published and published data collected over the past 50 3aAHellpoBcKoro, KepaMHqeCKHe H3AeAWI, XpaH5lIIJ;HeC51 years and amounting to 500 references in Russian com­ B HaIJ;HOHaAbHOM MY3ee BTarnKeHTe H B My3ee PerHCTa­ pleted the study. Ha B CaMapKaHAe). B 06Iu;eH CAO)I(HOCTH 6bIAH H3yqeHbI In spite of a scatlered and disparate literature, the ex­ 60Aee 8 000 rAHIDIHbIX qepellKOB, H3 KOTOpbIX 7 000 He­ haustive inventory of references has enabled the identifi­ OIlHCaHbI. 3aBepmHAH H3yqeHHe qaCTbIO orry6AHKOBaH­ cation of 246 sites where evidences of painted ware cul­ Hble, a qaCTbIO Heorry6AHKOBaHHbIe AaHHbIe, c06paHHbIe tures type material were found. Archaeological research 10 BECTHMKMMLfAM, BbInYCK 13, 2011 BULLETIN OF IICAS, VOLUME 13, 2011

3a rrOCAeAHl1e 50 AeT 11 COCTaBA5IIOI.Ql1e 500 CCblAOK Ha so far has demonstrated that these cultures occupied the pyCCKOM 513bIKe. territory in very different ways depending on the area. HecMoTp51 Ha pa3p03HeHH}'1O 11 06'beMH}'lO AHTepa­ Thus, cultures in Sogdia, in the oasis of Turkmenabad TYPY, I1CqeprrbIBalOI.Qa51 Orrl1Cb 3aMeTOK rr03BOAHAa rrpo­ and in south-west Tajikistan numberless than ten settle­ H3BeCTH I1AeHTI1

11 AlOuAbe)K. Lhuillier J.

(TypKMeHIfCTaH) If A)I(apKyTaHe (Y36eKlfCTaH), rAe Bpa­ DZHAlIKUTAN I.qeHIfe IfCnOAb30BaHO TOAbKO B HeMHOrme MOpOAOrIf­ qeCKlfX KaTerOpIDIX C 06I.qIfMIf OpMaMIf If pa3MepaMIf (pIfC. 2). 3TO BeCbMa cTaHAapTIf3IfpyeT BeCb npoqecc npoIf3BoAcTBa. HeKoTopbIe If3 If3AeAlfH paCnIfCaHbI, HO me COOTHO­ IIIeHIfe K06I.qeH rrpoAyKqIfIf ClfAbHO pa3Alf'laeTCjI B 3aBIf­ ClfMOCTIf OT MeCTa. 06bIqHO, paCrrIfCHaR qaCTb npOAYK­ qIfIf COCTaBAReT rrpIfMepHO OT 1% AO 5% o6I.qero rrpo­ If3BOACTBa, HO B If3yqeHHbIX HaMIf MaTepIfaAax, KOTOpbIe BeCbMa nOKa3aTeAbHbI AAR TOrO nepIfOAa, nponopqlfjl pacnIfCHOH npOAJKqIfIf B03paCTaeT OT 10% AO 25% co­ rAaCHO HaxOAKaM Ha MeCT~. XOpOIIIO If3BeCTHbI TpIf crroco6a pacrrIfCbIBaHlfjI rro­ ULUG-DI'PE CYAbI. CaMa rro ce6e paCrrIfCHaR nOCYAa 60Aee pacnpo­ CTpaHeHa, 'leM rrocYAa C pe3HbIM If HaAenHbIM 0pHaMeH­ I--~ TOM. EbIAO IfAeHTIfIfqIfpoBaHO 60Aee 300 3CKlf30B, KOTOpbIe cBIfAeTeAbCTByroT 0 60AbIIIOM KyAbTypHOM If ~~ l '«l \ reorpaIfqeCKOM pa3Hoo6pa3IfIf. KaK npaBlfAO, HaIf6o­ 1 r-- Aee TIfnlf'lHbIH AeKop BKAIOqaeT B ce6j1 ropIf30HTaAbHbIH pIf3 B BepXHeH TpeTIf Ba3bI If AlfHIfIO Ha BHYTpeHHeM Pue. 2. KepaMu/Ca c pacnUCHbtM OpHaMeHmOM U3 Kpae, 3a IfCKAIOqeHIfeM KyAbTypbI qycTa (epraHCKaR AJlCap/CymaHa u Y-tyz-oene AOAlfHa), rAe rrpeo6AaAaIOT BepTIfKaAbHbIe y30pbI. B Fig. 2. Ceramics with painted ornaments CaMOM pIf3e pocnIfCb nOBTOpjleT TOT )I(e y30p Alf60 from Dhzarkutan and Ulug-depe BKAIOqaeT pa3Alf'1HbIe pIfCYHKlf, paCnOAO)I(eHHbIe PMOM 3 rro npIfHqHIIY CIfMMeTpIfIf (pIfC. 3) If OHIf ClfAbHO OTAlf­ ranging from 10 to 25 % according to the sites • qaIOTCjI OT OAHoro noceAeHlfjI K ApyrOMY. TaKlfM o6pa- Three decorative techniques are well known, with 30M, 60Aee lfAlf MeHee KOMllAeKCHaR accoqIfélqlfjl PIfCYH­ painted wares being far more widespread than incised KOB CaMa no ce6e npeAonpeAeAReT cooTBeTcTByIOI.qee and appliqué decorated ceramics. More than 300 paint­ reorpaIfqeCKOe paCnOAO)I(eHIfe. 11 XOTjI 3TIf rrpIfHqlfllbI ed designs were identified and show a great cultural and pocrrIfcIf A0A)I(HbI 6bIAlf 6bITb pe3yAbTaTOM onpeAeAeH­ geographical diversity. As a rule, the most typical decor

Horo cIfcTeMaTIf3IfpOBaHlfjI, TaK KaK rrocYAa Ha K~OM includes a horizontal frieze in the upper third of the yqacTKe BeCbMa CTaHAapTIf3IfpOBaHa, OCHOBbI nOAo6- vase and a line on the internal face of the lip, with the Horo cIfcTeMaTIf3IfpOBaHlfjI HeIf3BeCTHbI. PeAKo MO)I(HO exception of the Chust culture (Fergana valley) where BCTpeTIfTb ABa a6coAIOTHO OAlfHaKOBbIX If3AeAlfjl, 'ITO vertical decorations prevail. Then within this frieze, the n03BOAReT rrpeAnoAaraTb, qTO rOH'lap rrOAb30BaACjI OT­ decor itself, repeats the same design or includes various HOCIfTeAbHOH «cBo6oAOH TBOpqeCTBa». patterns placed side by side according to symmetrical HaIIIa pa60Ta TaK)I(e AeMoHcTpIfpyeT cJI.qecTBo­ principles (fig. 3) that differ very much from one site to BaHIfe TeCHOH CBjl3If Me~y onpeAeAeHHbIMIf TIfnaMIf the other. Thus, the more or less complex association of AIf3aHHa, MopoAOrIf'leCKOH OpMOH If IfCnOAb30BaH­ patterns itself de termines a relevant geographical indica~ HbIMIf MeTOAaMIf. 3TO oco6o rrplfMeqaTeAbHO B cAyqae tion. Although these decorating principles might result C OKpyrAaMIf COCYAaMIf pyqHOH pa6oTbI. K rrplfMepy, B from a codification, since the production of a site shows A)I(apKyraHe 3TIf Ba3bI BcerAa pacKparneHbI OAHlfM no­ great homogeneity and more or less close similarities BTOPjlIOI.qIfMCjI y30pOM, TorAa KaK Ba3bI B YAyr-Aene pac­ exist from one site to the other, the principles behind rrIfcaHbI HaIf60Aee 6oraTo CO CAO)I(HbIM If MeAKlfM y30- this codification are still very much unknown. It is un­ pOM (EeHAe3y-CapMIfeHTo If ArolfAbe, B rre'laTIfj CAaHa common to find two ceramics with absolutely identi­ ArolfAbe If paHKopoM). B KOKTene pe3HoH AeKop B cal painted designs, and this makes us believe that the OCHOBHOM BCTpeqaeTCjI Ha KysIIIIfHax pyqHOH pa60TbI potter benefited from a relative "individual freedom of (pIfC. 4). B3alfMOCBjl3b C OpHaMeHTOM If IfCnOAb30BaH­ expression': HOH TeXHOAorIfeH nOKa3bIBaeT, 'ITO TI.qaTeAbHOCTb rrpIf Our work also demonstrated the existence of a close

12 BECTHMK MMl...(AM, BbIIIYCK 13, 20 11 BULLETIN OF IICAS, VOLUME 13, 2011 rrpOH3BOACTBe 3aBHceAa OT 3HaqeHIDI H KaT K 60Aee rr03AHeMY rrepHoAY (AroHAbe) plex and meticulous designs (Bendezu-Sarmiento & I1CaMHAAHHOB H ParreH) B rreqaTH) cpeAHero H rr03AHero Lhuillier) on press; Lhuillier & Francfort) submitted). )l{eAe3HOro BeKa. In Koktepe) the incised decorations are mostly found on handmade jars (fig. 4). The correlation between the or­ PErHOHAAbHA1l KAPTOrPAcDlUI namentation and technology indicates that the involve­ PACIIHCHbIX KEPAMHqECKHX KYAbTYP ment in making these depends on their meaning or their K HaCTO.sIII:t;eMY BpeMeHH 6bIAO orrHcaHO TpHHaAU;aTb function. KYAbTyp pacrrHcHoH KepaMHKH) HeKoTopble H3 HHX H3- Sorne typo-chronological elements that were exca­ BeCTHbI TOAbKO rro pacKoIIKaM H3 OAHOH TeppHTopHH: vated show that coarse-tempered cooking pots that have MaprHaHa) rrOAHO)l{lfe KorreTAara) XopacaH) TypKMeHa- often been categorized as belonging to the painted ware 6aAcKHH oa3Hc) 1O:>KHa.sI oaKTpIDI) ceBepo-3arraAHa.sI oaK­ cultures) should in fact be dated to a much later chrono­ TpH.sI) ceBepo-BOCTOqHa.sI OaKTpIDI) lO:>KHbIH CorA) ceBep­ logical indicator (Lhuillier) Isamiddinov & Rapin) in HbIH CorA) qaq) YCTpYIIIaHa If epraHCKa.sI AOAHHa. press) that continued and developed in the Middle and 3TH KyAbTypbI MoryT 6bITb cBeAeHbI K ceMH rpyrrrraM Late Iron Age. (pHe. 5): - qaq) YCTpYIIIaHa H ceBepHbIH CorA) y KOTOpbIX CXO­ A REGIONAL CARTOGRAPHY OF PAINTED )l{a.sI TeXHHKa rrpoH3BoAcTBa KepaMHKH) aHaAOrHqHble WARE CULTURES H3AeAH.sI H3 MeTaAAa H KaMH.sI H oAHHaKOBbIe apJGfTeK­ Currently) thirteen of these painted ware cultures TypHbIe cTaHAapTbI) OTHOC.sITC.sI K rpyrrrre A; have been characterized) sorne of which are only known - epraHa rrpeACTaBA.sIeT C060H OC06bIH rrpHMep from one site: Margiana) the foothills of Kopet Dagh) (rpyrrrra B») TaK :>Ke KaK H lO:>KHbIH CorA (rpyrrrra C) ; Khorasan) Turkmenabad oasis) southern Bactria) north­ - CeBepO-3arraAHa.sI OaKTpIDI (rpyrrrra D») ceBepo­ western Bactria) north-eastern Bactria) southern Sogdia) BOCTOqHa.sI OaKTpH.sI (rpyrrrra E») 1O:>KHa.sI OaKTpH.sI (rpyrr­ northern Sogdia) Chach) Ustrushana and the Fergana rra F) .sIBA.sIIOT C060H 060c06AeHHble rpyrrrrbI; valley. - TeXHOAOrH.sI rrpoH3BoAcTBa KepaMHKH H apXHTeK­ These cultures can be aggregated into seven groups Typa 061>eAHH.sIIOT MaprHaHY) rrOAHO)l{lfe KorreTAara) (fig. 5): HpaHCKHH XopacaH H perüoH OAeH-Aerre (rpyrrrra G). - Chach) Ustrushana and northern Sogdia) which share COOTBeTCTBeHHO rpyrrrrbI Ha OCHOBe rAaBHbIX pa3AH­ the same cerarnic technologies) the same metallurgic and qJfÜ H 06~HX qepT MoryT 6bITb cBeAeHbI K TpeM 60Ab­ IIIHM KaTerOpH.sIM pacrrHcHbIX KepaMHqeCKHX KyAbTyp (pHC.S): - KaTerOpH.sI 1) «ceBepHa.sI») BKAlOqaeT epraHcKyIO AOAHHY) qaq) YCTpYIIIaHY H CorA (rpyrrrrbI A) B) C). 06- IllHe qepTbI 3TOH KaTeropHH: (1) OTHOCHTeAbHO rrpo­ CTa.sI KH H ceprrbI; (4) rrocTpOeHHbIe H3 Cblpu;oBoro KHprrHqa HAM :>Ke rAHHO- 6HTHble AOMa) BKAlOqa.sI Xlf)l{HHbI H MHO:>KeCTBO rroAyrrOA- 3eMHbIX AOMOB) CMHO:>KeCTBOM CHAOCHbIX.sIM BOKpyr. - KaTerOpH.sI 2-«IO:>KHble» rpyrrrrbI BMeCTe C KyAbTy­ paMH C rrOAHO)I{Jf.sI KorreTAara) IO:>KHOH MaprHaHbI) Xo­ pacaHa H OAeH-TerrbI (TO eCTb rpyrrrrbI F HG). Ha60p Puc. 3. KpaUlCHa51 8a3a U3 ~y2-aene (© MAFTur) KepaMHKH rrOKa3bIBaeT 60AbillOe pa3Ho06pa3He TeXHO- Fig. 3. Painted vase from Ulug-depe (© MAFTur) 13 AIOUAbe )K. Lhuillier J.

AOrYlH, MOpKeAe3HbIX 0PYAHH: Tpy­ are in group A; Aa, 6pOH30BbIe HaKOHeqHRKH cTpeA .sIBNIIOTOI HCKAIOqe­ - Fergana is a special case (group C), as is southern HHeM. AOMa IIocTpoeHbI H3 rAHHbI HAR cblpqoBoro KHP­ Sogdia is (group B); IIHqa, MHorHe H3 HHX AHlIIb HeoIIpeAeAeHHbIe CTpOeHH.sI - North-western Bactria (group D), north-eastern HAR BpeMeHHbIe CTO.sIHKH. EOAbIIIHe coopy:>KeHH.sI CTpO­ Bactria (group E), southern Bactria (group F) are distinct HARCb Ha IIAaTKHKHCTaHe (TO eCTb Khorasan and the Odej-depe region (group G). rpyrrIIbI D HE). Ha60p KepaMRKH AOBOAbHO-TaKH 3a­ These groups can be integrated into three larger cat­ MblCAOBaT. HaH60Aee THIIHqHbI KaMeHHbIe HO:>KH H cep­ egories of painted ware cultures (fig. 5), which are based IIbI. ECTb AOKa3aTeAbCTBa HaAHqH.sI MeTaAAyprHqeCKOH: on the major differenees and common features of these IIPOAYKl.\HH. EOAbIIIHe coopy:>KeHH.sI CTpOHARCb Ha IIAaT­ cultural groups: KaIOT pa3AHqH.sI Chach, Ustrushana and Sogdia (i.e. groups A, B, C). B MaTepHaAbHOH: COCTaBNlIOm;eH:, a TaK:>Ke B X03.sIH:CTBe Common features of this ensemble are: (1) relatively H 06pa3e :>KH3HH. OHH TaK:>Ke MoryT COOTBeTCTBOBaTb simple eeramics forms with a simple ornament cata­ HeCKOAbKHM IIOAHTlfqeCKHM 06pa30BaHH.sIM, Ka:>KAOe H3 logue, (2) a metallurgical tradition far more advanced KOTOpbIX pa3BHBaAOCb caMOCTO.sITeAbHO. TeM He MeHee, than anywhere else, (3) Lithic tools, which frequently X03.sIH:CTBO H MaTepHaAbHa.sI KyAbTypa B3THX KaTerOpH.sIX include knives and sickles, (4) Houses, made of raw 06'beAHH.sIIOT Bee YKa3aHHbIe rpyrrIIbI B 60Aee KpyrrHbIH: bricks or adobe, including sorne huts on posts and many KyAbTypHbIH:, a B03MO:>KH0 H peAHrH03HbIH: \

---5em

Pue. 4. KepaMUica e pe3HblM opHaMeHmoM U3 KOIcmene Fig. 4. Examples Of jars with incised omament from Koktepe

14 BECTHMK MMJM11, BbIIIYCK 13, 2011 BULLETIN OF IICAS, VOLUME 13, 2011

Ensemble 1

Ensemble 3 "centre"

Ensemble 2 ------::=::-.."" "south"

Puc. 5. PacnpeoeAeHue KYAbmyp KpaUleHou KepaMUKU no zpynnaM u KamezopwlM Fig. 5. Distribution ofpainted ware cultures, cultural groups and larger categories

KyAbTyp COOTHOlIIemœ rracT6Hlu;Horo )KHBOTHOBOACTBa typical lithic or metallic tools, apart from the bronze H ceAbCKOrO X03.SI:aCTBa CHAbHO OTAH'IaAaCb OT OAHOH arrowheads. Houses are made of raw bricks or abodej rpyrrnbI K APyrOH. CaMbIe ceBepHbIe KyAbTypbI B03BO­ many are just undetermined constructions on posts. Big AHAH nOAyrroA3eMHbIe )KHAHrn;a, oKpy)KeHHbIe MHoro­ citadels were built on mud brick platforms. qHCAeHHbIMH CHAOCHbIMH .sIMaMH, 'lTO He Ha6AlOAaeTc.SI - Ensemble 3 "centre" groups together cultures of B lO)l(HbIX perHoHax. TaM)Ke 60AblIIe Bcero HaxOAOK KO­ northern Bactria, in present Uzbek Surkhan-Darya and CTea AOIuaAeH H OCTaTKOB c6pYH. Y)Ke 3TH AaHHbIe, He­ south-western Tajikistan (i.e. groups D & E). The ceram­ CMOTp.sI Ha CAO)KHOCTb HHTeprrpeTHpOBaHH.sI, YKa3bIBaIOT ic complex is quite elaborate. Lithic knives and sickle are Ha KOqeBOe nacTyrnecTBo, pacrrpOCTpaHeHHoe B ceBep­ particularly typical. Evidence of metallurgical produc­ HbIX CTeIlSlX U;eHTpaAbHOH A3HH. HarrpoTHB, B IO)KHbIX tion exists. Citadels were built on mud brick platforms. perHoHax 60Aee pa3BHTbI opOCHTeAbHbIe CHCTeMbI, YKa- These three ensembles (fig. 5) refer to variations in 3bIBalOII\He Ha rrpeeMCTBeHHOCTb C 3eMAeAeAb'leCKHMH the material complex, but also in economy and way of CTPYKTypaMH, pa3BHBlIIHMHC.sI B 6pOH30BbIH BeK. life. They may also correspond to several political bod­ OTCyTcTBHe npeAMeTOB pOCKOlIIH H 3axopoHeHHH ies, each one of which pursued its own development AaeT HeBepHoe npeACTaBAeHHe 0 COU;HaAbHbIX CTPYKTy­ independentIy. Nevertheless, economy and mate rial pax 3THX KyAbTyp, yrrpOrn;a.sI MX. THrrbI KepaMHKH H Me­ cultures in these categories link all the cultural groups TaAAyprHqeCKOrO rrpOH3BOACTBa YKa3bIBaIOT Ha 'laCTH'l­ together into a larger cultural and possibly religious phe­ HYIO CneU;HaAH3aU;HIO peMeCAeHHoro rrpOH3BOACTBa nomenon. (MeTaAAyprHSl B ceBepHbIX KyAbTypax, KepaMHKa B IO)K­ HbIX). DOAee Toro, pa3BHTHe MOH}'MeHTaAbHOH apXHTeK­ ECONOMY, SOCIETY AND RELIGION TypbI H YKpeIlAeHHH AOKa3bIBaeT HaAH'lHe 3AHT crroc06- Differences observed in the material assembling seem HbIX opraHH30BaTb rrocTpollKy 60AblIIMX coopy)KeHHH to correspond partIy to socioeconomic variations. This H IlOAAep:>KHBaTb opOCHTeAbHbIe CHCTeMbI (B IO)KHbIX is the case for subsistence economy: among agro-pas­ perHoHax). BAacTb, CKopee Bcero, He 6bIAa u;eHTpaAH- toral cultures, the ratio and nature of cattle rearing and 30BaHa, a opraHH30BaHa AHlIIb B CTerreHH, AOCTaTO'lHOH agriculture varied greatIy from one group to the other. AMI ynpaBAeHHSI TeppHTopHeH H KOHTpOA.sI HaA CeAbCKO­ The northernmost cultures developed a semi-subterra­ X03RHCTBeHHbIMH yrOAb.sIMH. 3TO OrrpeAeA.sIAO COU;HaAb­ ne an architecture, surrounded by numerous silos, which HbIe HpeAHrH03HbIe rrpHHU;HIIbI MX MaTepHaAbHOH KyAb- don't exist in the southern regions. This is also where the

15 Lhuillier J.

Typbl, qTO 06'b5ICIDIeT OTCyTcTBHe rrpeAMeTOB pOCKOIIIH, ratio ofhorse bones and harness equipment is the high­ rro KpaflHe Mepe B C03AaHHH AOAI'OBeqHbIX rrpeAMeTOB est. This data alone, though difficult to interpret, makes 6blTa (AroHAbe, B rreqaTH). BorrpeKH 06rn;errpHIDITb1M sense when talking about nomadic pastoralism, which is rrpeACTaBAeHH5IM, OqeBHAHa5I CKpOMHOCTb MaTepH­ widespread in the northern steppes of Central Asia. On aAbHOrO 6blTa He065I3aTeAbHO 03HaqaeT COqHaAbHO- the contrary, in southern regions, irrigation networks

3KOHOMHQecKYID, rrOAHT~eCKYID H KyAbTypHyro «rrpH­ are more developed and show continuity with the agri­ MHTHBHOCTb». cultural structures developed in the Bronze Age. TOQHa5I q,opMa rrpaKTHKOBaBIIIHXC5I BepOBaHHH He­ The absence of prestigious goods and burials gives a H3BeCTHa, HO OT~aeTC5I OT BpeMeH 6pOH30Boro BeKa. mistaken image of the social structures of these cultures HeKoTopbIe 3AeMeHTbl, BrrOCAeACTBHH pa3BHBIIIHeC5I as simple in character. The nature of cerarnic and met­ B Ma3AeH3M, y)l(e 3aMeTHbI. K rrpHMepy, TaKHe, KaK Bbl­ allurgic productions indicates a partial specialization of CTaBAeHHe OCTaHKOB ycorrIIIHX. AIITpOrrOAOrHQeCKOe craft production (of metallurgic production in the north­ HCCAeAOBaHHe OCTaHKOB yKa3bIBaeT Ha TO, QTO KOCTH ern cultures, of ceramic production in the southern cul­ 6bIAH paCCe5IHbl rro pa3HbIM CA05IM rroceAeH}iH, B pa3~­ tures). Furthermore, the development of monumental HbIX MecTax. Bep05ITHo, B )l(eAe3HblH BeK KaxeKCH5I CTaAa architecture and fortifications prove society was struc­ OCHOBHOH q,OpMOH rrorpe6eHH5I H rrpe06AaAaAa Ha BceM tured with elites able to organize large-scale construc­ IO)l(HOM rrpOCTpaHCTBe I4eHTpaAbHOH A3HH. Hap5IAY tion works and maintenance of the irrigation networks c HeH cyrn;ecTBOBaAH H HHbIe 06P5IAbl, TaKHe, KaK c60p (in the southern regions). Power was probably little rrpaxa B ypHbl HAM )l(e rrorpe6eHHe OCTaHKOB B OTAeAb­ centralized and organized so as to manage the territory HbIX HAM 06rn;HX MOrHAax 6e3 rrOrpe6aAbHbIX Bern;eH. and control lands for agriculture. It defined social and CTerreHb pacrrpOCTpaHeHHOCTH H yCAOBH5I rroA06HbIX religious principles for their material culture and lauded 06p5IAOB He yCTaHoBAeHbI. the absence of prestigious goods, at least when made of lasting materials (Lhuillier, submitted). Unlike what is rEHE311C, PA3BIITIIE Il IIC'lE3HOBEHIIE commonly thought, the apparent austerity of material PACnllCHbIX KEPAMllqECKHX KYAbTYP assemblages does not necessarily entail socioeconornic, Pa3BepHYTa5I KaTeropH3aqH5I TeppHTopHH (pHC. 5) H political and cultural "simplicity':

H3yqeHHe MaTepHaAbHbIX KyAbTyp QaCT~HO AaIOT OT­ The nature of the religion practiced remains un­ BeTbl Ha Borrpoc 0 rrepexoAe OT 6pOH30Boro BeKa, XOT5I known, but it is distinct from the Bronze Age. Sorne ele­ 3Ta rrp06AeMaTHKa Bce ern;e rrpeAMeT AA5I AHCKyCCHH [CM. ments that willlater develop into mazdeism are already Ky3bMHHa, 2007, rA. 26, 0630p rHrrOTe3J. I4eHTpaAbHa5I apparent, such as the exhibition of corpses for example. A3H5I KaK eAHHoe qeAoe 6bIAa MeCTOM KOHTaKTOB co An anthropological study ofbone remains showed that CTerrHOH KyAbTypOH Ha rrpOT5I)l(eHHH Bcero 6pOH30Boro bones were scattered in the different settlement layers BeKa, B oc06eHHOCTH B rr03AHHH BeK 6pOH3bI. 3TH KOH­ on many sites Emaciation probably became the major TaKTbl 6bIAH rrpOAOA)l(HTeAbHbIMH H MHpHbIMH, K HaQaAY mortuary treatment and prevailed throughout southern )l(eAe3HOro BeKa He 6bIAO BTOp)l(eHHH HAM MHrpaqHH, Central Asia in the Iron Age, while other marginal prac­ OHH BHeCAH CBOH BKAaA B 06pa30BaHHe H CTpyKTypy tices also existed such as the secondary deposit ofbones KyAbTyp paHHero )l(eAe3HOro BeKa. BAH5IHHe CTerrHbIX or the burial of corpses in individual or collective tombs KyAbTyp oc06eHHo 3aMeTHO B ceBepHoH KaTeropHH 1, without funeral deposits, so that the conditions of these Qb5I TeppHTOpH5I C 6poH30Boro BeKa 6bIAa rrOA Herro­ different practices cannot be determined. cpeAcTBeHHblM BAH5IHHeM CTerrH. Ho B « qeHTpaAbHoH » H «IO)l(HOI1» KaTeropH5IX 2 H 3 KOQeBa5I KyAbTypa CTOA­ GENESIS, DEVELOPMENT AND DISAPPEARING KHyAacb C HaCAeAHeM MeCTHOH qHBHAM3aqHH OKca. B OF PMNTEDWARE CULTURES paHHeM )l(eAe3HOM BeKe 06a TeQeHH5I B3aHMOAeHCTBoBa­ The elaborate categorization of territory (fig. 5) and AH H yqacTBOBaAH B reHe3Hce H pa3BHTHH KyAbTyp pac­ the study of their material culture provide sorne answers rrHCHOH KepaMHKH. OceAAa5I qHBHAM3aqH5I 06'b5ICIDIeT to the question of the transition from the Bronze Age, KyAbTypHyro rrpeeMCTBeHHOCTb, KOTOpa5I 3aMeTHa B Ke­ question still subject to debate [see Kuz'mina, 2007, paMHKe, B apXHTeKType H 3eMAeAeAHH, TorAa KaK CTerr­ chap. 26, for a review of hypothesisesJ. Central Asia Ha5I TpaAHqH5I XOTb H rrpHBHOCHAa MaA03aMeTHbIe H3- as a whole was marked by contacts with steppe people MeHeHH5I B KepaMHKy, HO cyrn;ecTBeHHbIe-B X035IHCTBO, B all along the Bronze Age and more strongly in the Late oc06eHHOCTH B Tex cq,epax, KOTopble He 6bIAH OCBoeHbl Bronze Age. These contacts were lengthy and peaceful,

16 BECTHMK MMLTA11, BbIIIYCK 13, 2011 BULLETIN OF IICAS, VOLUME 13, 2011

'-lHBHAI13alV'feM OKca. CAO:>Imo orrpeAeAHTb 6blAH AH 3TH and there were no invasion or migration in the beginning KyAbTypHbIe H3MeHeHIDI CBH3aHbI CMHrpaU;IDIMH HaCeAe­ of the Iron Age, but they contributed to the structura­ HlfjI, H Borrpoc 06 3THH':IeCKOM rrpHHaMe:>KHOCTH AlOAeM tion of Early Iron Age cultures. The influence of steppe KyAbTypbI pacrrHcHoM KepaMHKH OCTaeTCH OTKpbITbIM. cultures was particularly strong in the "north" ensemble CKopee Beero, KyAbTypa rr03AHero :>KeAe3HOro BeKa rrpo­ 1, whose territory was under direct influence since the HCXOAHT OT HHTeHCHBHoro B3aHMoAeMcTBIDI AByx KyAb­ Bronze Age. But, in the "centre" and "south" ensembles TypHblX Te':leHHM Ha rrpOTjI)I(eHHH rr03AHero BeKa 6pOH- 2 and 3, the steppe influence came up against the legacy 3bI H Bcero :>KeAe3HOro BeKa. OAHO HarrpaBAeHHe llIAO co of the local Oxus civilization. In the Early Iron Age, both CTeneH EBpa3HH Ha IOr B IJ;eHTpaAbHYIO A3HlO, a BTopoe trends interacted and took part in the genesis and devel­ C IOra Ha eeBep IJ;eHTpaAbHOM A3HH. Aa:>Ke B CAyqéUlX, opment of painted ware cultures. The second explains KorAa KyAbTypbI « ceBepHoM» KaTeropHH rrOKa3bIBalOT cultural continuity, as shown in the ceramics, in the ar­ npH3HaKH orrocpeAoBaHHoM CBH3H c CHHbU;3HHeM, o':le­ chitecture or land management, while the first brings BHAHO, qTO CHHbU;3HH He HBAHeTCH MeCToM 3apO:>KAeHIDI about barely perceptible changes in the ceramics but KyAbTyp pacrrHcHoM KepaMHKH [Francfort 2001; Lhuil­ major improvements in the economy especially in the lier 2007]. are as that had remained out of reach of the Oxus civiliza­ Pe3yAbTaTbI Haillero HCCAeAOBaHIDI rrepexoAa C paH­ tion. It is difficult to determine if these cultural changes Hero :>KeAe3HOro BeKa K cpeAHeMY H rr03AHeMY :>KeAe3HO­ were linked to population migrations, and the question MY BeKy 0603HaqaIOT BeCbMa CXO:>KHe rrpou;eccbI, KaK B of the ethnic identity of the painted ware cultures people n03AHHH BeK 6POH3bI, TaK H B 3rroxy paHHero :>KeAe3HO­ remains unanswered. The Late Iron Age culture seems ro BeKa. B « QeHTpaAbHoM » H «1O:>KHOM » KaTerOpHjIX 2 to result from a rich interaction in the Late Bronze Age H 3 KyAbTypa 5[3 II-III pa3BHAaCb H pacrrpOCTpaHHAaCb and throughout the whole Iron Age between two cul­ BllAOTb AO Xope3Ma. A B CorAHaHe, qaqe H B KHBaH, the "north" ensemble show sorne evidences of indirect OAHaKO CXO:>KHe qepTbI C co CTerrHOM KyAbTypOM caKOB. contact with the [Lhuillier 2007], it is clear that HarrpoTHB, IO:>KHaH IJ;eHTpaAbHaH A3ID1 pa3BHBaAa CBH- the Xinjiang is not at the origin of the painted ware cul­ 3H C MHAHeH [Francfort & Lecomte 2002] H rr03:>Ke C tures [Francfort 2001; Lhuillier 2007]. AxeMeHHAaMH H3 MpaHa [Francfort 2005]. 3TO HaAO­ Our research results on the transition from Early Iron :>KHAO orrpeAeAeHHble paMKH Ha KyAbTypHoe pa3BHTHe, Age to Middle and Late Iron Age indicate a very similar HO OAHOBpeMeHHO C03AaAO B03MO:>KHOCTb KyAbTypHoro process to the one observed in the Late Bronze Age and pa3BHTlfj{ B HeKOTopblX cepax, TaKHX, KaK rAHnTHKa H in the Early Iron Age. In the "centre" and "south" ensem­ KepaMHKa rOHqapHOrO Kpyra. bles 2 and 3, the Yaz II-III culture developed and spread 0606l'-\aH MO:>KHO CKa3aTb, qTO KyAbTypHaH TeppH­ until Khorezm. But in Sogdiana, Chach and the Fergana TOplfj{ 5[3 II-III rrepeceKaeTcH C 30HOM U;HBHAH3aU;HH valley, local cultures prevail [Gorbunova, 1986; Lyon­ OKca 6poH30Boro BeKa H C perHoHoM, HaxOAHBIlIHMCH net, 2009]. The latter develop locally and are all very nOA BAlfjIHHeM CTerrHOM KyAbTypbI caKOB H aHApoHoBu;eB different from one another but show common features [Bendezu-Sarmiento, 2007]. TaKHM 06pa30M, paHHHM with the steppe culture. On the contrary, southern )l(eAe3HbIH BeK 6blA eAHHCTBeHHbIM MOMeHTOM peaAbHO­ Central Asia developed ties with the [Francfort ro 06'beAHHeHlfj{ ,}TOH 0611IHpHOM TeppHTopHH, rAe AaAb­ & Lecomte 2002] and later the Achaemenids of Iran HeHIIIee npocTpaHcTBeHHoe pacffiHpeHHe conpOBO:>KAa­ [Francfort 2005], which marked their cultural develop­ AOCb MaTepHaAbHbIM yrraAKoM, HaqaBIlIHMCH B rr03AHHM ment but allowed local cultural revivals, like glyptic art BeK 6POH3bI, OKOAO 1700 AeT AO HailleM 3pbI. HeCMOTpH and wheel-made ceramics. Ha 3TO, B 3TOT rrepHOA rrpOH30llIAH CYII\eCTBeHHbIe KyAb­ Broadly speaking, the Yaz II-III cultural area overlaps TypHble H3MeHeHlfjI, KOTOpbIe rrpOAOA:>KaAHCb Ha rrpOTH­ the area of the Bronze Age Oxus civilization and the )l(eHHH Beero :>KeAe3HOro BeKa. MO:>KHO rrpeArrOAO:>KHTb, area under the influence of the steppe Saka culture un­ '{TO KyAbTypa pacrrHCHOM KepaMHKH CMorAa pacnpo­ der the [Bendezu-Sarmiento, 2007]. CTpaHHTbŒ Ha TaKOH 60AbillOH TeppHTopHH 6AarOAapH Early Iron Age thus marks the orny real period of unity cAa60H 06l'-\eCTBeHHOH CTpyKType rrOCAe yrraAKa U;HBH­ of this vast territory, where ongoing territorial expan­ AH3aQHH OKca B KOHu;e 6pOH30Boro BeKa. rro rrpH':IHHe sion is masked by material decline, continuing a pro cess

17 AlOuAbe)K. Lhuillier J.

OTCyTCTBIDI CHAbHOH BAaCTIf 3Ta KyAbTypa paCrrpOCTpa­ started during the Late Bronze Age, around 1700 B.e. HlfAaCb BIIAOTb AO OKpalfH, AO TOrO KaK Ha'lUa yracaTb But despite this, strong cultural changes occurred in this CaMa. K TOMY BpeMeHIf, BO BpeMR cpeAHero If rr03AHero period and continued right through the Iron Age. We )l(eAe3HOro BeKOB rrOjffilfAOCb HOBoe «rrOAlfTIf'leCKOe can suggest that painted ware cultures developed on so eAlfHCTBO». CoxpaHeHIfe 3AeMeHTOB 6pOH30Boro BeKa a vast territory thanks to the weak structuration of soci· HapSIAY C HOBbIMIf rrpIf3HaKaMIf, pa3BlfBIlllfMIfC.SI rr03AHee ety after the decline of the Oxus civilization at the end BO BpeMR cpeAHero If rr03AHero )l(eAe3HOro BeKOB, 060- of the Bronze Age. Thanks to the lack of strong power, 3Ha'laeT paHHIfH )l(eAe3HbIH BeK KaK rrOAAlfHHbIH rrepe­ they spread out to marginal regions before their own re­ XOAHOH rrepIfOA. traction, when a new "political entity" appeared in the Middle and Late Iron Age. The survival of Bronze Age 1. AaHHéUI CTaTMI 6blAa nepepa60TaHa If3 AOKTOpCKOH AlfC­ features together with new elements developed in the cePTaQHH, 3aIQillQeHHOH B )'HIfBepHCTeTe ITaplf)l(a ITaHTeoH­ Middle and Late Iron Age make Early Iron Age a real COp60HHbI, nOA PYKOBOACTBOM AHpH-ITOASI opa (AYJiAbep 2010). period of transition. 2. ABTOp Bblpa)l(aeT 6AaroAapHocTb BceM apXeOAOraM, KOTO­ pbIe 06ecne'lIfAH AOCTyrr KnepBOHCTO'lHHKaM: BY36eKHcTaHe 1. The present article evolves from a Ph.D. the sis defended at A)I(. EeHAe3y-CapMIfeHTo, A. EepAHMYPaAoB, A. E060xoA)l(a­ the University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne under the direc­ eB, aKyAoB, Ill. IllaiiAyAAaeB; B KblprbI3- cess to these firsthand materials: in Uzbekistan, J. Bendezu­ CTaHe E. AMaR6aeBa, 'I. )KoAAorneB; B TypKMeHIfCTaHe M. Sarmiento, A. Berdimuradov, A. Bobokhodzhaev, F. Grenet, MaMeAOB H O. AeKOHT, a TaK)I(e B. CapHaHHAlf. M. Isamiddinov, G. Ivanov, M. Khasanov, E. Lushnikova, B. 3. BA<}>paClfa6e pacnIfcaHbI 2 H315 'lepeIIKOB; B A)I(aM-53 -16 Lyonnet, V. Minosiants, Sh. Pidaev, C. Rapin, B. Rondelli, H3 30; B A)I(apKyTaHe - 37,42% H3 172 'lepeIIKOB (xonl 60Ab­ S. Mustafakulov, Sh. Shajdullaev; in Kyrgyzstan, B. Arnan­ rnHHCTBO rrocyAbI HaHAeHo B myp<}>ax H AaHHoe COOTHorneHHe baeva, Ch. Joldoshev; in Turkmenistan, M. Mamedow and 0. He MO)l(eT paCCMaTpHBaTbC.SI KaK XapaKTepHoe); B KOKTerre - Lecomte, and also V. Sarianidi. 14,96% H3 3181 'lepeIIKa; B KyqyK-Tene: HeycTaHoBAeHo; B 3. In Mrasiab : 2 of 15 sherds were decorated; in Dhzam-53 : CaHrHp-Tene - 6,05% If3 248 'lepeIIKOB; B Ty.Sl6yry3e - 15,9% 16 of 30 sherds ; in Dzharkutan : 37,42% of 171 sherds (but H3 412 'lepenKOB; B YAyr-Aerre - 24,4% H3 312 'leperrKOB; Ha the majority of this pottery came from pits and this propor­ MaAbIX pacKonKax B

18 BECTHl1K Ml1I..JAH, BbIIIYCK 13, 2011 BULLETIN OF I!CAS, VOLUME 13, 2011

Francfort H.-P. Asie centrale, in P. Briant et R. Boucharlat 2. zum 1. vorchristlichenJahrtausend. Akten des Internation­ (eds.), L'archéologie de l'empire achéménide: nouvelles alen Kolloquiums Berlin, 23 bis 26 November 1999, Kollo­ recherches, Paris: De Boccard, 313-351. 2005. quien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte, vol. 6, Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Francfort H.-P. L'âge du bronze en Asie centrale. La Habelt, 221-235. 2001. civilisation de l'Oxus, Anthropology of the Middle East, vol. FrancfortH.-P.Asiecentrale,inP.BRIANT etR. BOUCHA­ 4, n° l, 9l-111. 2009. RLAT (eds.), L'archéologie de l'empire achéménide: nou­ Francfort H.-P., Kuz'mina E.E. « Du nouveau dans la velles recherches, Paris: De Boccard, 313-351. 2005. chronologie de l'Asie centrale du Chalcolithique à l'Age du Francfort H.-P. L'âge du bronze en Asie centrale. La civilisa­ Fer », in J. Evin, e. OBERLIN, J.-P. DEGAS, (dir.), Actes tion de l'Oxus, Anthropology of the Middle East, vol. 4, n° l, du congrès « 14C Archéologie » , Lyon, 6-10 avril 1998, 91-111. 2009. Mémoires de la Société préhistorique française, 26, Revue Francfort H.-P., Kuz'mina E.E. « Du nouveau dans la chro­ d'archéométrie, Supplément, Rennes: Presses de l'Université ?ologie de l'Asie centrale du Chalcolithiqu~ à l'Age du Fer », de Rennes, 467-469.1999. mJ. EVIN, e. OBERLIN,J.-P. DEGAS, (drr.), Actes du con­ Francfort H.-P., Lecomte O. Irrigation et société en Asie grès « 14C Archéologie», Lyon, 6-10 avril 1998, Mémoires de centrale des origines à l'époque achéménide, Annales, la Société préhistorique française, 26, Revue d'archéométrie, Histoire, Sciences sociales, n° 3, 625-663. 2002. Supplément, Rennes : Presses de l'Université de Rennes, Gorbunova N.G. The Culture of ancient Fergana: VI century 467-469. 1999. B.e. -VI century A.D., BAR International series 281, Oxford: Francfort H.-P., Lecomte O. Irrigation et société en Asie BAR. 1986. centrale des origines à l'époque achéménide, Annales, His­ HCélMHAAHUOB M.X. H XacauoB M.X. I1CTOpIDI ApeBHero toire, Sciences sociales, n° 3, 625-663. 2002. li cpeAHeBeKoBoro KepaMWIeCKOro rrpoH3BoAcTBa Haxma6a. Gorbunova N.G. The Culture of ancient Fergana: VI century TaulKeHT: A. KaAbIpH, 2000. B.e. - VI century A.D., BAR International series 281, Oxford: Kuz'minaE.E. The Origin of the Indo-Iranians. Leiden: Brill, BAR. 1986. 2007. 762p. Isamiddinov M.Kh. & Khasanov M.Kh. lstorija drevnego Lecomte O. Entre Iran et Touran, recherches archéologiques i srednevekogo keramicheskogo proizvodstvaNakhshaba, au Turkménistan méridional (2001-2006), Comptes rendus Tashkent: A . Kadyri, 2000. des séances de l'année 2007, Académie des Inscriptions et Kuz'minaE.E. The Origin of the Indo-Iranians. Leiden: Brill, Belles-Lettres, Paris: Diffusion de Boccard, 2007.195-226. 2007. 762p. Lhuillier J. « Les relations des cultures à céramique modelée Lecomte O. Entre Iran et Touran, recherches archéologiques peinte d'Ouzbékistan avec le Xinjiang - 2e moitié du Ile au Turkménistan méridional (2001-2006), Comptes rendus millénaire av. Je. » , 3e congrès du Réseau Asie - lMASIE, des séances de l'année 2007, Académie des Inscriptions et 27-28 septembre 2007, Paris, http://www.reseau-asie.com/ Belles-Lettres, Paris: Diffusion de Boccard, 2007.195-226. cgi-bin/ prog/ gateway.cgi ?langue=fr&password=&email= LhuilIier J. « Les relations des cultures à céramique mod­ &dir= myfile _ colloque&type=jhg54gfd98gfd4fgd4gfdg&i elée peinte d'Ouzbékistan avec le Xinjiang - 2e moitié du Ile d=417 &telecharge_ now= 1 &file=a33Ihuillier-.Johanna.pdf millénaire av. Je. » , 3e congrès du Réseau Asie - lMASIE, 2007. 27-28 septembre 2007, Paris, http://www.reseau-asie.com/ LhuillierJ.Le phénomène des « cultures à céramique modelée cgi-bin/ prog/ gateway.cgi ?langue=fr&password=&email= peinte » en Asie centrale dans l'évolution et la transformation &dir= myfile_ colloque&type=jhg54gfd98gfd4fgd4gfdg&i des sociétés de la fin de l'âge du Bronze et du début de l'âge du d=417 &telecharge_ now= 1 &file=a33Ihuillier-.Johanna .pdf Fer (Ile-1er millénaire avant n.è.). Une synthèse comparative 2007. et régionale de la culture matérielle, Thèse de Doctorat de LhuilIier J. Le phénomène des « cultures à céramique mod­ l'Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. 2010. elée peinte » en Asie centrale dans l'évolution et la transfor­ Lhuillier J. submitted: Entre volonté d'égalitarisme et mation des sociétés de la fin de l'âge du Bronze et du début ostentation architecturale, les cultures du début de l'âge du de l'âge du Fer (Ile-1er millénaire avant n .è.). Une synthèse Fer en Asie centrale, in Brunet, O. et Sauvin, Ch.-E. (dir.), comparative et régionale de la culture matérielle, Thèse de Les marqueurs du pouvoir, Actes de la quatrième journée Doctorat de l'Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. 2010. doctorale d'Archéologie de Paris l, Presses Universitaires de LhuilIier J. submitted: Entre volonté d'égalitarisme et osten­ la Sorbonne. tation architecturale, les cultures du début de l'âge du Fer en Lhuillier J. & Francfort H.-P. submitted: La céramique de Asie centrale, in BRUNET, O. et SAUVIN, Ch.-E. (dir.), Les l'âge du Fer ancien (Yaz 1) à Ulug-depe, in O. Lecomte (ed.), marqueurs du pouvoir, Actes de la quatrième journée docto­ Ulug-depe au Turkménistan. Résultats des 10 premières rale d'Archéologie de Paris l, Presses Universitaires de la Sor­ campagnes (2001-2010). bonne. Lhuillier J., Isamiddinov M.Kh. & Rapin C. PaHHe)IŒAe3- LhuilIier J. & Francfort H.-P. submitted: La céramique de HblH BeK ceBepHoro CorAa: xapaKTepHcTHKa H rrpeBapHTeAb­ l'âge du Fer ancien (Yaz 1) à Ulug-depe, in O. LECOMTE HaR TlilIOAOrWIeCKaR XpoHoAorIDI/ / I1CTOpIDI MaTepHaAbHOH (ed.), Ulug-depe au Turkménistan. Résultats des 10 pre­ KyAbTypbl Y36eKHcTaHa (B rreqaTH). mières campagnes (2001-2010). Lyonnet B. Un nouvel assemblage céramique pour l'âge du LhuilIier J., Isamiddinov M.Kh. & Rapin C. in press: Fer au Chach et en Sogdiane, in D. Alirnova et Sh. Pidaev Rannezheleznyj vek severnovo Sogda: kharakteristika i (eds.), Le rôle de Tachkent dans le développement de la predvaritel'naja tipologicheskaja khronologija, Istorija civilisation mondiale, Tashkent: Fan, 2009.19-22. Material'noj Kul'tury Uzbekistana. MaccoH B.M. ApeBHe3eMAeAeAbQeCKaR KyAbTypa MaprHa­ Lyonnet B. Un nouvel assemblage céramique pour l'âge du Hbl. MaTepliaAbl 11 11CCAeAOBaHIDI rro apxeoAorHH CCCP, TOM Fer au Chach et en Sogdiane, in D. ALIMOVA et Sh. Pl­ 73. MocKB a: HaYKa, 1959. DAEV (eds.), Le rôle de Tachkent dans le développement de

19 AlOuAbe)K. Lhuillier J.

MaToaoaeB B.X. AOKaAbHble BapHaRTbI qyCTCKOH KyAbTypbI la civilisation mondiale, Tashkent: Fan, 2009. 19-22. <1>epraRbI. AHCC .... KaHA. HCT. HaYK. AeHHHrpaA, 1985. C 236. Masson V.M. Drevnezemledel'cheskaja kul'tura Margiany, IhLumKo B.H. ApeBHee ropoAH~e OAeH-Aene Ha cpeAHeM Materialy i Issledovanija po Arkheologii SSSR, vol. 73. TeqeHHHAMyAapbH. KD, NQ 8. C. 27-54.1979. Moscou: Nauka, 1959. Rapin C. and the Shaping of Central Asia: from Matbabaev B.Kh. Lokal'nye varianty chustkoj kul'tury Fer· the early Iron Age to the Kushan period, in J. Cribb et G. gany, Dissertatsija na soiskanije uchenoj stepeni candidata Herrmann (eds.), After Alexander: Central Asia Before Islam, istoricheskikh nauk, Leningrad, 1985. 236 p. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 29-72. Pilipko V.N. Drevnee gorodishche Odej-Depe na srednem PTBeAaA3e 3.B. ApxeoAor~ecKHe HCCAeAOBaHIDI B EaHAeKa­ techeniiArnudarji, KD, n° 8, p. 27-54.1979. He B 1974-1975 rr. TpYAbI EaliCYHCKOH HayqHoH 3KcneAHQHH, Rapin C. Nomads and the Shaping of Central Asia: from the NQ 3. C. 67-95. 2007. early Iron Age to the Kushan period, in]. CRIBB et G. HER­ CarAyAAaeB A.C. YC~6bl ApeBHeH EaKTpHH. TarnKeHT: <1>aR, RMANN (eds.), After Alexander: Central Asia Before Islam, 1987. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 29-72. CapHaHHAH B.H. XpaM H HeKpOnOAb TH.hNITene, MocKBa: Rtveladze E.V. Arkheologicheskie issledovanja v Bandykhane HaYKa, 1989. v 1974-1975 gg. Trudy Bajsunskoj nauchnoj ekspditsii, n° 3, mailAyAAaeB m.B. CeBepHKe­ p. 67-95. 2007. Ae3Horo BeKa. TarnKeHT: A6AYAAa KaAblpH, 2000. Sagdullaev A.S. Usad'by drevnej Baktrii, Tashkent. Fan, CBep'IKOB A.M., Bopo~~Ka H. ApxeoAor~ecKHe HCCAe­ 1987. AOBaHIDI B EaHAeKaHe B 2005 r. TpYAbI EaHcYHcKoH HayqHoH Sarianidi V.1. Khram i Nekropol' Tilljatepe, Moscou: Nauka, 3KcneAHQHH, NQ 3. C. 97-l31. 2007. 1989. BHHorpaAoBa H.M., PauOB B.A., epraHbI. MocKBa: HaYKa, 1962. neolita i bronzogo veka), Moscou: IV RAN, 2008. 3aAHenpoBcKHR Iü.A. OmcKoe noceAeHHe. K HCTOpHH Venco Ricciardi R. Archaeological Survey in the Upper <1>epraHbI B 3noxy n03AHeH 6pOH3bI. EHmKeK: Mepac, 1997. Atrek Valley (Khorasan, Iran): Prelirninary Report, Mesopo­ C.171. tamia, vol. XV; 51-72. 1980. Zadneprovskij Ju.A. Drevnezemledel'cheskaja kul'tura Fer­ gany. Moscou: Nauka, 1962. Zadneprovskij Ju.A. Oshskoe poselenie. K istorii Ferganyv epokhu pozdnej bronzy. : Muras, 1997. 171 p.

20