DOCSLIB.ORG

MUNICIPAL STRATEGIC STATEMENT 2010 Page 1 Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MUNICIPAL STRATEGIC STATEMENT 2010 Page 1 Of Page 1 of 131 FUTURE MELBOURNE (PLANNING) Agenda Item 5.2 COMMITTEE REPORT MUNICIPAL STRATEGIC STATEMENT 2010 7 December 2010 Presenter: David Mayes, Manager Strategic Planning Purpose and background 1. The purpose of this report is to present the outcomes of the public exhibition of Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C162 – City of Melbourne Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS) and to request the Minister for Planning to appoint a panel to consider the submissions. 2. On 13 April 2010 the Future Melbourne Planning Committee resolved to seek authorisation from the Minister for Planning to exhibit Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C162 City of Melbourne Municipal Strategic Statement. The Minister granted the authorisation on 1 June 2010. Key Issues 3. Amendment C162 was exhibited between 8 July and 3 September 2010. Attachment 2 outlines the extent of notification and consultation. One hundred and forty five submissions were received. A summary of the submissions and the management response to each submission is at Attachment 3. 4. The proportion of submissions on each of the main MSS areas was as follows: height and building design (45 per cent); sustainable transport and connectivity (23 per cent); environmental sustainability (12 per cent); character and heritage (10 per cent); city safety and amenity (5 per cent). 5. Submissions generally supported the MSS. The sustainability objectives were strongly supported, in particular those for sustainable transport. Connectivity of cycling and pedestrian routes was well supported with the importance for these connections to continue into the adjoining municipalities being highlighted. The protection of heritage, cultural assets and parkland was also well supported. 6. The areas where submissions expressed concern were: city safety in public places, diminishing residential amenity in the Central city and Southbank related to the 24 hour city policy and late night licensed venues; the impact of building height and poor building design on pedestrian amenity; the lack of human scale, poor building design and lack of community facilities at Docklands; the designation of particular urban renewal areas, in particular replacing industry in parts of Kensington and North Melbourne in favour of mixed use precincts; the amenity impacts of the proposed Webb Dock rail link; and the future development potential of the Queen Victoria Market precinct. 7. Management have assessed the submissions and revised the MSS in response and to correct administrative errors. The revised version of the MSS (Attachment 4) will form the basis of Council’s presentation to the Panel. Recommendation from management 8. That the Future Melbourne Committee: 8.1. note management’s assessment of the submissions as set out in Attachment 3; 8.2. request the Minister for Planning appoint a Panel to consider the submissions to Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C124; and 8.3. note that the form of the Amendment to be presented to the Independent Panel will be in accordance with Attachment 4. Attachments: 1. Supporting Attachment 2. Statutory Exhibition and Consultation of C162 3. Summary of Submissions and Management Response 4. Post exhibition version of the MSS Page 2 of 131 Attachment 1 Agenda Item 5.2 Future Melbourne Committee 7 December 2010 SUPPORTING ATTACHMENT Legal 1. Divisions 1 and 2 of Part 3 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 deal with planning scheme amendments, setting out provisions in relation to the exhibition and notification of proposed planning scheme amendments and the consideration of submissions. Specifically, sub-section 23(1) of the Act provides that: “After considering a submission which requests a change to the amendment, the planning authority must - (a) change the amendment in the manner requested; or (b) refer the submission to a panel appointed under Part 8; or (c) abandon the amendment or part of the amendment.” The recommendation made in the report is therefore consistent with the Act. Finance 2. The costs associated with the recommendation to proceed to an Independent Panel amounts to $40,000. The 2010-11 Annual Plan and Budget includes provision for this expenditure in the operational budget for Strategic Planning. Conflict of interest 3. No member of Council staff, or other person engaged under a contract, involved in advising on or preparing this report has declared a direct or indirect interest in relation to the matter of the report. Stakeholder consultation 4. Attachment 2 to this report provides detail on the statutory notification and community consultation undertaken as part of the exhibition of the amendment. Relation to Council policy 5. The new Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS) has been developed in close consultation with the Department of Planning and Community Development and VicUrban. 6. The MSS is consistent with Council policy. Environmental sustainability 7. The MSS provides a framework for the future growth and development of the City to be energy efficient, low carbon and adapted against the impacts of climate change predicted to include water shortages, heatwaves, sea level rise and more frequent storm events. 1 Page 3 of 131 Attachment 2 Agenda Item 5.2 Future Melbourne Committee MELBOURNE PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C162 7 December 2010 MUNICIPAL STRATEGIC STATEMENT PUBLIC EXHIBITION Amendment C162 was exhibited in accordance with the Planning and Environment Act 1987 and consulted on widely to all City of Melbourne ratepayers and the general public at large. Amendment C162 was exhibited between 8 July and 3 September 2010. Specifically: • Public notices were placed in the o Government Gazette, (8 July 2010) o the Herald Sun, (29 June 2010) o The Age, (29 June 2010) o the Australian, (29 June 2010) o the Moonee Valley Community News,(25 June 2010) o the City Weekly (1 July 2010) and o the Melbourne Times; (30 June 2010) • The amendment and supporting information were available at the City of Melbourne Planning Counter, municipal libraries and the Department of Planning and Community Development and the Councils websites; • Notice of the amendment and the amendment fact sheet (outlining the key messages of the MSS) were sent to by direct mail to all property owners within the municipality; • Notice of the amendment and the amendment fact sheet was sent to the prescribed State Government Ministers, relevant authorities, relevant stakeholders, including community groups. • Information sessions were held for Residents (21 July 2010) and Planning Professionals (28 July 2010). 1 Page 4 of 131 1 Attachment 3 Agenda Item 5.2 Future Melbourne Committee AMENDMENT C162-NEW MUNICIPAL STRATEGIC STATEMENT 7 December 2010 SUBMISSIONS FROM PUBLIC EXHIBITION No Submitter Details Issue Summary of Submission Management Response Recommended changes to the MSS 1 Ian Walker City safety • Highlighted that it is insufficient to presume a 24 hour liveable city includes MSS deals with safety in the public realm No change the elements of “safety” and ’’cleanliness”. where people feel and are safe through recommended Requests these words be specifically building design and materials. included in the text to ensure a safe and MSS cannot govern on cleanliness. clean environment. 2 John Jenkin Transport • Concerned with the huge volumes of traffic The use of sustainable transport, in particular No change (cars and trucks), lack of pedestrian/cycle public transport, is encouraged and the use of recommended user links and the narrowness and general private motor vehicles is considered as a condition of Princes Street, Carlton through complementary mode of transport. Royal Park. The MSS supports improved rail links for freight movement to reduce the use of road based freight vehicles. 3 Eugene Chan Sustainability • Expressed the importance of achieving a The MSS (Clause 21.05) focuses on delivering No change completely sustainable city. a sustainable city. recommended 4 Melissa Hebbard Transport • Agrees with the re-development of City The proposed stations for the Melbourne No change Environment North but concerned with the lack of an Metro Rail Tunnel have been factored into the recommended underground station for the huge student MSS. The Dept of Transport currently plan population. for underground stations in North Melbourne • Requests better use of grey water, more and Parkville. Both WSUD and planting of water features be built in the urban trees is encouraged. renewal areas and more trees planted. Docs No # 6007399 Amendment C162-Summary of Submissions 1 Page 5 of 131 2 5 Leon Parnham Facilities • Concerned with the total lack of sporting The MSS provides the strategic perspective to No change facilities and a school in Docklands. plan for the provision of services and recommended improvements in the municipality. More detailed planning will be undertaken as part of the Docklands 2nd decade project. 6 Michael Walsh Development • Concerned with the number of high rise The MSS objectives provide the basis for No change developments in the A’Beckett achieving good standards of amenity across recommended Street/Franklin Street area and the lack of the City. amenity (noise, light, pollution, dust) for existing residents. 7 Lisa Ingram Development • Against the targeted urban renewal around Land use and development opportunities for No change Facilities the Queen Victoria Market Precinct. the area within the vicinity of the Queen recommended Noise Concerned about the impact of urban Victoria Market will be the subject of growth (particularly height) on their quiet investigation through a comprehensive residential street. structure plan. In addition to the Structure • Supports the scale and built form outcomes Plan, a separate piece of work is underway for the Queen Victoria Market Precinct as which is looking at development opportunities specified in 21-04-2. on the carpark site adjacent to the market. • Concerned with the location of major The community will be consulted on these facilities close to urban renewal areas (and projects. the therefore close to their home). • Concerned with protection of views, light and environment with the development of 6 storey buildings. • Highlighted the impact of industrial and artist studios uses (noise) and in mixed use areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management
    VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens
    [Show full text]
  • New Style Metlink Timetables Œ See Page 6
    August 2005, Number 157 RRP $2.95 ISSN 1038-3697 New style Metlink timetables œ see page 6 Table Talk August 2005 Page 1 Top Table Talk: • Yarra trams 75 extended to Vermont south œ see page 4 • New style Metlink timetables in Melbourne œ see page 6 • Manly ferry troubles œ see page 10 Table Talk is published monthly by the Australian Association of Timetable Collectors Inc. [Registration No: A0043673H] as a journal covering recent news items. The AATTC also publishes The Times covering historic and general items. Editor: Duncan MacAuslan, 19 Ellen Street, Rozelle, NSW, 2039 œ (02) 9555 2667, dmacaus1@ bigpond.net.au Editorial Team: Graeme Cleak, Lourie Smit. Production: Geoff and Judy Lambert, Chris London Secretary: Steven Ward, 12/1219 Centre Road, South Oakleigh, VIC, 3167, (03) 9540 0320 AATTC on the web: www.aattc.org.au Original material appearing in Table Talk may be reproduced in other publications, acknowledgement is required. Membership of the AATTC includes monthly copies of The Times, Table Talk, the distribution list of TTs and the twice-yearly auction catalogue. The membership fee is $50.00 pa. Membership enquiries should be directed to the Membership Officer: Dennis McLean, PO Box 24, Nundah, Qld, 4012, Australia. Phone (07) 3266 8515.. For the Record Contributors: Tony Bailey, Chis Brownbill, Derek Cheng, Anthony Christie, Graeme Cleak, Michael Coley, Ian Cooper, Ken Davey, Adrian Dessanti, Graham Duffin, Noel Farr, Neville Fenn, Paul Garred, Alan Gray, Steven Haby, Craig Halsall, Robert Henderson, Michael Hutton, Albert Isaacs, Bob Jackson, Matthew Jennings, Peter Jones, Geoff Lambert, Julian Mathieson, Michael Marshall, John Mikita, Peter Murphy, Len Regan, Graeme Reynolds, Scott Richards, Lourie Smit, Tris Tottenham, Craig Watkins, Roger Wheaton, David Whiteford.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into the Issuing of Infringement Notices to Public Transport Users and Related Matters
    Investigation into the issuing of infringement notices to public transport users and related matters December 2010 Ordered to be printed Victorian government printer Session 2010 P.P. No. 2 This page has been intentionally left blank. www.ombudsman.vic.gov.au LETTER TO THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL AND THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY To The Honourable the President of the Legislative Council and The Honourable the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Pursuant to sections 25 and 25AA of the Ombudsman Act 1973, I present to the Parliament a report of an investigation into the issuing of infringement notices to public transport users and related matters. G E Brouwer OMBUDSMAN 20 December 2010 letter to the legislative council and the legislative assembly 3 www.ombudsman.vic.gov.au CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Authorisation of ticket inspectors 6 Failure of operators to report incidents 7 Use of excessive force 8 Issuing of infringement notices 8 Internal review of the issuing of infringement notices 8 BACKGROUND 10 The infringements system 10 Complaints to my office 11 Investigation methodology 11 Key stakeholders 11 Authorised officers 13 Revenue 14 APPOINTMENT OF AUTHORISED OFFICERS 16 Recruitment 16 Authorisation 16 Defects in authorisation process 17 Conclusions 19 Recommendations 20 REPORTING OF INCIDENTS INVOLVING AUTHORISED OFFICERS 22 Statutory requirement of the operators to report incidents 22 Failure of the operators to report incidents 23 Use of excessive force 23 Reporting of complaints under the Metlink Services Agreement 25 Conclusions
    [Show full text]
  • On the Road on the Paths
    On the road Hospice DLEY PARK EN E Is it legal to ride E H M DA NOLA N AV RA two abreast? ER Xavier D T Prep Are the road rules the S 3101 BVD LM Coll. Yes, but you must not ride 9 Hole Par 3 ST C KEW R same when you’re on a WA A 3101 GOLF COURSE C K YARRA McEVOY ST KEVIN SYLVA ST C more than 1.5 metres apart. TANTON GV bike or driving a car? SEE ADJOINING CITY OFYARR YARRA & BOROONDARA TRAVELSMART MAPS BAN N LA ST ST HO S BVD ST GIPP W.H.S. MA V YARRA BEND PARK RAVEN ST YTON i ST ST I Dickinson PHY H T T T C R ST YARRA T GV Yes, bicycles are classified und S Res E E E S S GIPPS S ST ST T R Is it OK to occupy a ST ST ST T r Sch O T M L L O E RD ST S S HODGSO MUR 16 R REEVES L D D E E M S 350 p OU LL T PEEL ST GLASSH I as vehicles under the law L H E D D A e S AEL ST CT ST RY whole traffic lane when Steine C S ST 684 A D LAVER ST O O . STEVENSON Sophia ST T RAVE ST S ST O PH D Yarra ST W S ST EL IT ST CR R R ROBERT ST MOLLISON FIN ST Ste H 246 (H (H L ST A HEN LIT.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL Victoria Government Gazette
    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 258 Wednesday 26 June 2019 By Authority of Victorian Government Printer Transport Integration Act 2010 TRANSPORT RESTRUCTURING ORDER (ROADS CORPORATION) NO. 1/2019 Order in Council This Order may be cited as the Transport Restructuring Order (Roads Corporation) No. 1/2019. The Governor in Council under Division 2 of Part 4A of the Transport Integration Act 2010 orders that: 1. Commencement This Order comes into operation on 1 July 2019. 2. Definitions 2.1 In this Order – ‘conferred functions’ means the functions conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria by paragraph 3 of this Order. 2.2 Terms used in this Order have the same meaning as that term has in the Transport Integration Act 2010, unless the context otherwise requires. 3. Conferred functions The functions specified in Part A of Schedule 1 are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria. 4. Ongoing and concurrent conferral 4.1 The conferred functions are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria on an ongoing basis. 4.2 The conferred functions are to be performed or exercised concurrently by the Head, Transport for Victoria and the Roads Corporation (meaning that each of the Head, Transport for Victoria and the Roads Corporation may exercise the functions independently of the other). 5. Effect of conferral on the Head, Transport for Victoria The conferred functions are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria only to the extent that the exercise or performance of the function does not require the exercise of a function, power or duty conferred exclusively on another person or body by or under another Act.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report
    BUS AND COACH SOCIETY OF VICTORIA INC. A0006261D Preserving AustrAliA’s bus And coAcH HeritAge ABN 86 829 759 481 2015 AnnuAl Report President’s Report: Mick KAne After getting off to a slow start this year, the Society has run a number of successful tours. The Society continues on a steady course. Most of the success is down to Paul Kennelly, an extremely hard working Secretary/Treasurer/Tours organiser, assisted by Craig Halsall, along with some suggestions from Jason Lipszyc. I would also like to thank Caleb Ellis & Craig Coop for their work on the Committee. Thanks also to all the operators that have generously let us use their buses on tours, which enables the Society to keep costs low. Also thanks to other members who do a bit on the tour day whether it is driving a bus, helping move buses or helping with the BBQ. Thanks also to Geoff Foster for doing the magazine & Hayden Ramsdale for proof reading. And thanks to the members, for without you there is no Society, but times change and it’s getting to the stage for that to happen in the Committee with some new blood. Secretary’s Report: Paul Kennelly MembersHip Membership was 164 members for the year, equal to our highest ever. It is with sadness that I report the death of two of our members during the year – Charles Craig and Ray Edser. Charles was one of the early members of the BCSV and president for 7 years from 1973. He was one of the early bus preservationists.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Victoria Second Container Port Advice
    Infrastructure Victoria Second Container Port Advice Port Strategic Transport Modelling Final | 2.5 4 April 2017 Todd Road / Cook Street / Webb Dock Drive / Westgate Freeway Port Strategic Transport Modelling Infrastructure Victoria Second Container Port Advice Project No: IS175000 Document Title: Port Strategic Transport Modelling Document No.: Final Revision: V2.5 Date: 4 April 2017 Client Name: Client No: Project Manager: John Richardson Author: John Richardson File Name: J:\IE\Projects\03_Southern\IS175000\06 Technical\IV Ports Advice VITM Modelling Report V2.5.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Floor 11, 452 Flinders Street Melbourne VIC 3000 PO Box 312, Flinders Lane Melbourne VIC 8009 Australia T +61 3 8668 3000 F +61 3 8668 3001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2017 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 1 31/01/2017 Limited to a list of model inputs for the purpose of J Richardson confirming all inputs. 2 10/03/2017 Modelling outputs added J Richardson A Newman 3 27/03/2017 Updated with Deloitte comments J Richardson A Newman 4 04/04/2017 Updated with IV comments J Richardson A Newman i Port Strategic Transport Modelling Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • UNLEASHING the POTENTIAL of NATURE DISCUSSION PAPER on CITY ECOLOGY, ECOSYSTEMS and BIODIVERSITY Join the Discussion Online at Participate.Melbourne.Vic.Gov.Au/Nature
    UNLEASHING THE POTENTIAL OF NATURE DISCUSSION PAPER ON CITY ECOLOGY, ECOSYSTEMS AND BIODIVERSITY Join the discussion online at participate.melbourne.vic.gov.au/nature Acknowledgements Many people have contributed ideas presented within this Discussion Paper including within the City of Melbourne, and researchers at the Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology (ARCUE), RMIT, University of Melbourne and the Stockholm Resilience Centre. Cover image of Blue Banded Bee, Amegilla bee Source: Museum Victoria participate.melbourne.vic.gov.au/nature CONTENTS Purpose and process 03 Key terms 04 Chapter 1: Nature in Melbourne 05 Chapter 2: How does our city contribute to the Australian landscape? 09 Chapter 3: Why should we care about urban ecosystems? 11 Chapter 4: How can we better value and manage nature? 15 Chapter 5: How can we undertake nature sensitive urban design and planning? 17 Chapter 6: Should we increase nature in the private realm? 21 Chapter 7: What symbolises nature for Melburnians? 23 Chapter 8: How can ecology help us respond to climate change? 28 Chapter 9: How can Melbourne demonstrate leadership? 31 Selected resources 33 References 34 2 participate.melbourne.vic.gov.au/nature Purpose and process Purpose Process The purpose of this discussion paper is to An indicative timeline for the process support conversation and seek comment is shown below: from our community and stakeholders to contribute to the development of a strategic policy framework for municipal ecology, biodiversity and ecosystem services, or nature within our city. February 2015 City of Melbourne has not previously Discussion paper released for public comment. formulated a comprehensive policy position on urban nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Metro Rail Project 20 April 2016 Revision: C1 MMR-AJM-PWAA-RP-NN-000815 Reference: CMS332569
    Melbourne Metro Rail Project 20 April 2016 Revision: C1 MMR-AJM-PWAA-RP-NN-000815 Reference: CMS332569 Transport Impact Assessment Melbourne Metro Rail Authority Document control record 121 Exhibition Street Melbourne VIC 3000 PO Box 23061 Docklands VIC 8012 Australia A person using AJM JV documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by AJM JV. Document control Report title Transport Impact Assessment Document ID MMR-AJM-PWAA-RP-NN-000815 Contract No. CMS332569 File path Client Melbourne Metro Rail Authority Client contact Daniel Cullen Revision Rev Date Prepared by Author/s Verifier Approver details/status Peter Hunkin Final issued for David C1 20/04/2016 Peter Hunkin & Katherine Lisa Ryan Exhibition Anderson Mitchell Current revision C1 Approval Approver Author signature signature Name Peter Hunkin Name Lisa Ryan © Copyright 2016 AJM Joint Venture. The concepts, data and information contained in this document are the property of AJM Joint Venture. No part of this document may be reproduced, used, copied, published or adapted for use except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 or with the consent of AJM Joint Venture. This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Melbourne Metro Rail Authority (“MMRA”), and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between AJM Joint Venture and MMRA. AJM Joint Venture makes no representations and undertakes no duty to any third party who may use or rely upon this report, and accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    EXTRACT FROM BOOK PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL FIFTY-EIGHTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Thursday, 25 June 2015 (Extract from book 9) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable ALEX CHERNOV, AC, QC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC, QC The ministry Premier ......................................................... The Hon. D. M. Andrews, MP Deputy Premier and Minister for Education .......................... The Hon. J. A. Merlino, MP Treasurer ....................................................... The Hon. T. H. Pallas, MP Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Employment ............ The Hon. J. Allan, MP Minister for Industry, and Minister for Energy and Resources ........... The Hon. L. D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Roads and Road Safety, and Minister for Ports ............. The Hon. L. A. Donnellan, MP Minister for Tourism and Major Events, Minister for Sport and Minister for Veterans .................................................. The Hon. J. H. Eren, MP Minister for Housing, Disability and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health, Minister for Equality and Minister for Creative Industries ........... The Hon. M. P. Foley, MP Minister for Emergency Services, and Minister for Consumer Affairs, Gaming and Liquor Regulation .................................. The Hon. J. F. Garrett, MP Minister for Health and Minister for Ambulance Services .............. The Hon. J. Hennessy, MP Minister for Training and Skills .................................... The Hon. S. R. Herbert, MLC Minister for Local Government, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Industrial Relations ................................. The Hon. N. M. Hutchins, MP Special Minister of State .......................................... The Hon. G. Jennings, MLC Minister for Families and Children, and Minister for Youth Affairs ...... The Hon. J. Mikakos, MLC Minister for Environment, Climate Change and Water ................
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Most Active Transportation, Trucking & Railroad
    Oceania's Most Active Transportation, Trucking & Railroad Professionals on Social - June 2021 Industry at a glance: Why should you care? So, where does your company rank? Position Company Name LinkedIn URL Location Employees on LinkedIn No. Employees Shared (Last 30 Days) % Shared (Last 30 Days) 1 Inland Rail https://www.linkedin.com/company/inland-rail/Australia 242 42 17.36% 2 Volvo Group Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/volvo-group-australia/Australia 285 45 15.79% 3 PACCAR Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/paccaraustralia/Australia 255 30 11.76% 4 Keolis Downer https://www.linkedin.com/company/keolis-downer/Australia 274 29 10.58% 5 Capital Transport https://www.linkedin.com/company/capital-transport/Australia 284 26 9.15% 6 Transurban https://www.linkedin.com/company/transurban/Australia 1,736 134 7.72% 7 Transdev Australasia https://www.linkedin.com/company/transdevaustralasia/Australia 470 36 7.66% 8 MaxiTRANS https://www.linkedin.com/company/maxitrans-industries/Australia 281 20 7.12% 9 Followmont Transport https://www.linkedin.com/company/followmont-transport-pty-ltd/Australia 228 16 7.02% 10 Arc Infrastructure https://www.linkedin.com/company/arc-infrastructure/Australia 230 16 6.96% 11 Transport for NSW https://www.linkedin.com/company/transport-for-nsw/Australia 12,266 841 6.86% 12 V/Line https://www.linkedin.com/company/vline/Australia 977 65 6.65% 13 Metro Trains Melbourne https://www.linkedin.com/company/metro-trains-melbourne/Australia 2,949 157 5.32% 14 Busways Group https://www.linkedin.com/company/busways-group-pty-ltd/Australia
    [Show full text]
  • Ocklandsstrategy
    OCKLANDSSTRATEGY 711.5 099451 DOC strategy Reference map overleaf ELBUURNE DOCKLANDS: STRATEGY FOR REDEVELOPMENT DOCKLANDS TASK FORCE JUNE 1992 •0) 0> 'tl .... • 0) U 0) 1:1 "is -g :>- o~ Reference map o~ ... §~ [-< p.. ;:::10) ~ \ o ;::l E-<E-<~ victoria Street '" ~ortn Dynon Road ... To Foots-1-----cray ., ,. ., ,.. DoCkraUhne ~-bb ,- - • Existing road and rail network • Proposed road and rail network • Docklands 1 Spencer Street Station 2 Former Railways Administration Building 3 World Congress Centre 4 World Trade Centre 5 Museum of Victoria 6 Charles Grimes Bridge 7 Flagstaff Gardens 8 Flagstaff Station 9 North Melbourne Station 250 500 750 1000 scale of metres 11Ii\fl~ lilllllll~11 ~I~ ~11111~1\~li lili\~\ M0052705 Melbourne Docklands: Strategy for Redevelopment A guide to redevelopment of Docklands, providing a broad framework within which further detailed planning and design and, ultimately, development can be undertaken. Docklands Task Force June 1992 Infrastructure Library 711.5 8489276 099451 Melbourne docklands : DOC strategy strategy for redevelopment CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 4.3.3.2 The internal road network 52 1.1 THE SITE 5 4.3.3.3 Traffic impacts 56 1.2 BRIEF HISTORY 5 4.3.4 Webb Dock rail line 57 1.3 STATE GOVERNMENT 4.3.5 Cars and parking 58 OBJECTIVES 6 4.3.6 Water transport 58 1.4 DOCKLANDSTASKFORCE 6 4.4 ECONOMIC 1~5 PUBLIC CONSULTATION 7 DEVELOPMENT 59· 1.6 DOCKLANDS AUTHORITY 7 4.4.1 Entertainment, leisure and 2 THE VISION 9 tourism 60 3 EXISTING 4.4.2 Transport 60 CHARACTERISTICS 17 4.4.3 Telecommunications 60
    [Show full text]