DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF at Ushmm.Org

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF at Ushmm.Org nazi ideology nazi A living memorial to the Holocaust, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum stimulates leaders and citizens to confront hatred, prevent genocide, promote human dignity, and strengthen democracy. Through a public/private partnership, federal support guarantees the Museum’s permanence, and donors nationwide make possible its educational activities and global outreach. and the holocaust nazi ideology and the holocaust why did the nazi regime systematically persecute and ultimately annihilate six million Jews between 1933 and 1945? Why were Roma, persons with mental and UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM physical disabilities, Poles, and African Germans targeted by the Nazis for destruction or decimation for racial, ethnic, or national reasons? And why did millions more including homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Soviet prisoners of war, and political opponents also suffer grievous oppression and death under Nazi tyranny? Nazi Ideology and the Holocaust explores these questions and provides a frame- work for understanding why and how the ideology of the Nazi regime led to unprecedented human consequences, the murder of 2 out of every 3 European Jews and the destruction of millions of others. UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 100 Raoul Wallenberg Place, SW Washington, DC 20024-2126 ushmm.org 9 780896 047129 UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM Iceland Iceland Iceland Finland ASIA Finland EUROPE Norway Norway europe 1938 Estonia europe Sweden Sweden Latvia major nazi camps Kaiserwald Ireland 1943–1944 Ireland Horseroed Denmark Lithuania Germany Great Netherlands East Great Prussia Stutthof Soviet Union Britain Britain Westerbork Neuengamme Ravensbrueck Koldichevo Bergen-Belsen Sachsenhausen Germany and Vught Treblinka Skarzysko-Kamienna Chelmno Occupied Territories Mechelen Dora-Mittelbau Majdanek Belgium Breendonk Sobibor Germany Poland Soviet Union Buchenwald Trawniki Compiegne Gross-Rosen Budzyn German Allies Fuenfbrunnen Poniatowa Drancy Auschwitz Belzec or Dependant States Flossenbuerg Starachowice Luxembourg Natzweiler-Struthof Plaszow Czecholovakia Schirmeck-Vorbuck Janowska Vittel Finland Mauthausen Caspian Sea Neutrals Dachau Caspian Sea France Austria Switzerland Hungary Bolzano Allies Romania Gurs Fossoli di Carpi San Sabba Riversaltes Sajmiste Yugoslavia Killing Centers Schabatz Azerbaijan Norway Azerbaijan Portugal Portugal Italy Armenia Nisch Armenia Spain Spain Bulgaria Other Camps Albania Salonika Iceland Turkey Turkey Greece Iran Iran Syria Syria North Cyprus Sweden North Cyprus Tunisia Morocco Algeria Iraq Morocco Algeria Tunisia Iraq Mediterranean Sea Cyprus Mediterranean Sea Cyprus Lebanon Lebanon Finland Israel Israel Ireland Norway Jordan Jordan Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Soviet Union Libya Egypt Libya Egypt german euthanasia” centers Sweden administration “germany 1940 –1945 Great Britain of europe 1944 Ireland Denmark Soviet Union Great Netherlands Britain Germany and Greater Germany Soviet Union Occupied Territories Netherlands Germany and Brandenburg Occupied Territories Belgium Germany Farthest German Gas Army Advance 1942 Bernburg German Allies General Government Bohemia Belgium or Dependant States Luxembourg & Moravia Lethal Injections Farthest German Army Advance 1942 Slovakia Hadamar General Government Neutrals Caspian Sea Sonnenstein France Switzerland Hungary Romania Allies Luxembourg Protectorate of Bohemia & Moravia Croatia Serbia Azerbaijan Portugal Italy Armenia France Grafeneck Spain Slovakia Bulgaria Hartheim Caspian Sea Albania Turkey Romania Greece Iran Switzerland Hungary Italy Syria Romania North Cyprus Morocco Algeria Tunisia Iraq Mediterranean Sea Cyprus Lebanon Israel Croatia Jordan Saudi Arabia Azerbaijan Libya Egypt Serbia Portugal Italy Armenia Spain Bulgaria Albania Turkey Greece Iran Syria North Cyprus Tunisia Morocco Algeria Iraq Cyprus Mediterranean Sea Lebanon Israel Jordan Saudi Arabia Egypt Libya Iceland Iceland Iceland Finland ASIA Finland EUROPE Norway Norway europe 1938 Estonia europe Sweden Sweden Latvia major nazi camps Kaiserwald Ireland 1943–1944 Ireland Horseroed Denmark Lithuania Germany Great Netherlands East Great Prussia Stutthof Soviet Union Britain Britain Westerbork Neuengamme Ravensbrueck Koldichevo Bergen-Belsen Sachsenhausen Germany and Vught Treblinka Skarzysko-Kamienna Chelmno Occupied Territories Mechelen Dora-Mittelbau Majdanek Belgium Breendonk Sobibor Germany Poland Soviet Union Buchenwald Trawniki Compiegne Gross-Rosen Budzyn German Allies Fuenfbrunnen Poniatowa Drancy Auschwitz Belzec or Dependant States Flossenbuerg Starachowice Luxembourg Natzweiler-Struthof Plaszow Czecholovakia Schirmeck-Vorbuck Janowska Vittel Finland Mauthausen Caspian Sea Neutrals Dachau Caspian Sea France Austria Switzerland Hungary Bolzano Allies Romania Gurs Fossoli di Carpi San Sabba Riversaltes Sajmiste Yugoslavia Killing Centers Schabatz Azerbaijan Norway Azerbaijan Portugal Portugal Italy Armenia Nisch Armenia Spain Spain Bulgaria Other Camps Albania Salonika Iceland Turkey Turkey Greece Iran Iran Syria Syria North Cyprus Sweden North Cyprus Tunisia Morocco Algeria Iraq Morocco Algeria Tunisia Iraq Mediterranean Sea Cyprus Mediterranean Sea Cyprus Lebanon Lebanon Finland Israel Israel Ireland Norway Jordan Jordan Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Soviet Union Libya Egypt Libya Egypt german euthanasia” centers Sweden administration “germany 1940 –1945 Great Britain of europe 1944 Ireland Denmark Soviet Union Great Netherlands Britain Germany and Greater Germany Soviet Union Occupied Territories Netherlands Germany and Brandenburg Occupied Territories Belgium Germany Farthest German Gas Army Advance 1942 Bernburg German Allies General Government Bohemia Belgium or Dependant States Luxembourg & Moravia Lethal Injections Farthest German Army Advance 1942 Slovakia Hadamar General Government Neutrals Caspian Sea Sonnenstein France Switzerland Hungary Romania Allies Luxembourg Protectorate of Bohemia & Moravia Croatia Serbia Azerbaijan Portugal Italy Armenia France Grafeneck Spain Slovakia Bulgaria Hartheim Caspian Sea Albania Turkey Romania Greece Iran Switzerland Hungary Italy Syria Romania North Cyprus Morocco Algeria Tunisia Iraq Mediterranean Sea Cyprus Lebanon Israel Croatia Jordan Saudi Arabia Azerbaijan Libya Egypt Serbia Portugal Italy Armenia Spain Bulgaria Albania Turkey Greece Iran Syria North Cyprus Tunisia Morocco Algeria Iraq Cyprus Mediterranean Sea Lebanon Israel Jordan Saudi Arabia Egypt Libya nazi ideology nazi A living memorial to the Holocaust, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum stimulates leaders and citizens to confront hatred, prevent genocide, promote human dignity, and strengthen democracy. Through a public/private partnership, federal support guarantees the Museum’s permanence, and donors nationwide make possible its educational activities and global outreach. and the holocaust nazi ideology and the holocaust why did the nazi regime systematically persecute and ultimately annihilate six million Jews between 1933 and 1945? Why were Roma, persons with mental and UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM physical disabilities, Poles, and African Germans targeted by the Nazis for destruction or decimation for racial, ethnic, or national reasons? And why did millions more including homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Soviet prisoners of war, and political opponents also suffer grievous oppression and death under Nazi tyranny? Nazi Ideology and the Holocaust explores these questions and provides a frame- work for understanding why and how the ideology of the Nazi regime led to unprecedented human consequences, the murder of 2 out of every 3 European Jews and the destruction of millions of others. UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 100 Raoul Wallenberg Place, SW Washington, DC 20024-2126 ushmm.org 9 780896 047129 UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizensâ•Ž Motives Near
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Proceedings of the Tenth Annual MadRush MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference Conference: Best Papers, Spring 2019 From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizens’ Motives Near Concentration and Extermination Camps During the Holocaust Jordan Green Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/madrush Part of the European History Commons, and the Holocaust and Genocide Studies Commons Green, Jordan, "From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizens’ Motives Near Concentration and Extermination Camps During the Holocaust" (2019). MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference. 1. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/madrush/2019/holocaust/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conference Proceedings at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizens’ Motives Near Concentration and Extermination Camps During the Holocaust Jordan Green History 395 James Madison University Spring 2018 Dr. Michael J. Galgano The Holocaust has raised difficult questions since its end in April 1945 including how could such an atrocity happen and how could ordinary people carry out a policy of extermination against a whole race? To answer these puzzling questions, most historians look inside the Nazi Party to discern the Holocaust’s inner-workings: official decrees and memos against the Jews and other untermenschen1, the role of the SS, and the organization and brutality within concentration and extermination camps. However, a vital question about the Holocaust is missing when examining these criteria: who was watching? Through research, the local inhabitants’ knowledge of a nearby concentration camp, extermination camp or mass shooting site and its purpose was evident and widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holocaust in Hungary
    THE HOLOCAUST IN HUNGARY When the Germans entered Hungary on March 19, 1944, its more than 800,000 Jews were the last intact Jewish community in occupied Europe. Between May 14 and July 9 – in less than two months and on the very eve of Allied victory – more than 400,000 were deported to Auschwitz, where 75% were killed immediately. Such swift, concentrated destruction could not have happened without the help of local collaborators – help Adolf Eichmann clearly expected when he brought only 200 staff with him to oversee the deportations. Collaborators included the government, the right wing parties, and the law-enforcement agencies, bolstered by the tacit approval of most non-Jews and Church authorities. Indeed, laws allowing synagogues to be expropriated for secular use and the many private requests for real estate and other property formerly owned by Jews, indicate that few expected any Jews to return. The Vatican, the International Red Cross, the Allies, and the neutral powers also had a role in the catastrophe, since it took place when details of the “Final Solution” – especially the Hungarian situation – were already known to them. In summer 1944, at the height of the deportations, the Allies rejected Jewish underground leaders’ pleas to bomb Auschwitz and the rail lines leading to it, claiming that bombers flying from Britain were incapable of attacking Poland and could not be diverted to targets not "military related." To be sure, pressure from President Roosevelt, Sweden’s king, and the pope – combined with the success of Operation Overlord and the Soviet Union’s summer offensive and Allied intimations they would carpet-bomb Budapest if its Jews were deported – did force Regent Miklos Horthy to stop the trains on July 7, 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Intersections in 21St-Century Europe
    Holocaust Intersections in 21st-Century Europe edited by Robert S. C. Gordon, Emiliano Perra Issue n. 10, Dicember 2016 QUEST N. 10 QUEST. Issues in Contemporary Jewish History. Journal of Fondazione CDEC Editors Guri Schwarz (Università di Pisa, editor in chief), Elissa Bemporad (Queens College of the City University of New York), Tullia Catalan (Università di Trieste), Cristiana Facchini (Alma Mater, Università di Bologna), Gadi Luzzatto Voghera (Fondazione CDEC), Michele Sarfatti (Fondazione CDEC), Marcella Simoni (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), Ulrich Wyrwa (Zentrum für Antisemitismusforschung, Berlin). Editorial Assistants Laura Brazzo (Fondazione CDEC) Sara Airoldi (Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Matteo Perissinotto (Università di Trieste) Book Review Editor Dario Miccoli (Università Cà Foscari, Venezia) Editorial Advisory Board Ruth Ben Ghiat (New York University), Paolo Luca Bernardini (Università dell’Insubria), Dominique Bourel (Université de la Sorbonne, Paris), Michael Brenner (Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München), Enzo Campelli (Università La Sapienza di Roma), Francesco Cassata (Università di Genova), David Cesarani z.l. (Royal Holloway College, London), Marco Cuzzi (Università degli Studi di Milano), Roberto Della Rocca (DEC, Roma), Lois Dubin (Smith College, Northampton), Jacques Ehrenfreund (Université de Lausanne), Katherine E. Fleming (New York University), Anna Foa (Università La Sapienza di Roma), Ada Gigli Marchetti (Università degli Studi di Milano), François Guesnet (University College London), Alessandro
    [Show full text]
  • The Holocaust
    The Holocaust The Holocaust by ReadWorks The Holocaust refers to the horrific time period from 1933 to 1945 when throughout Europe over six million Jewish men, women, and children were systematically killed by the Nazi government of Germany. This period is one of the most tragic chapters in human history. The Nazi government perceived the Jewish people as an inferior race and a threat to humanity. As a result, the Nazi government, led by Adolph Hitler, organized the mass murder of Jewish people. Their ultimate goal was to kill all Jewish people. Hitler became chancellor of Germany in 1933, representing the Nazi Party. He hated Jewish people. Soon after he became chancellor, the Nazi government made laws to limit the freedoms of Jewish people. The government also distributed anti-Semitic, or anti-Jewish, propaganda to the German people. Hitler believed that some groups of people were superior to other groups. He believed the Jewish people were not only a religious group; he defined them as a race. Hitler claimed that the Jewish people were a disease to humanity. The phrase, "The Jewish Question" referred to the question of the role of the Jewish people in society. The Nazi government looked to its own anti-Semitic policies as an answer. The Nazis developed a plan for the extermination of all Jewish people. They called it "The Final Solution to the Jewish Question." During World War II, the Nazis rounded up Jewish people who were still in Germany and Nazi- controlled territories. Some had already left or were in hiding, but many had decided to stay or had nowhere to go.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugee Policies from 1933 Until Today: Challenges and Responsibilities
    Refugee Policies from 1933 until Today: Challenges and Responsibilities ihra_4_fahnen.indd 1 12.02.2018 15:59:41 IHRA series, vol. 4 ihra_4_fahnen.indd 2 12.02.2018 15:59:41 International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (Ed.) Refugee Policies from 1933 until Today: Challenges and Responsibilities Edited by Steven T. Katz and Juliane Wetzel ihra_4_fahnen.indd 3 12.02.2018 15:59:42 With warm thanks to Toby Axelrod for her thorough and thoughtful proofreading of this publication, to the Ambassador Liviu-Petru Zăpirțan and sta of the Romanian Embassy to the Holy See—particularly Adina Lowin—without whom the conference would not have been possible, and to Katya Andrusz, Communications Coordinator at the Director’s Oce of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. ISBN: 978-3-86331-392-0 © 2018 Metropol Verlag + IHRA Ansbacher Straße 70 10777 Berlin www.metropol-verlag.de Alle Rechte vorbehalten Druck: buchdruckerei.de, Berlin ihra_4_fahnen.indd 4 12.02.2018 15:59:42 Content Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust ........................................... 9 About the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) .................................................... 11 Preface .................................................... 13 Steven T. Katz, Advisor to the IHRA (2010–2017) Foreword The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, the Holy See and the International Conference on Refugee Policies ... 23 omas Michael Baier/Veerle Vanden Daelen Opening Remarks ......................................... 31 Mihnea Constantinescu, IHRA Chair 2016 Opening Remarks ......................................... 35 Paul R. Gallagher Keynote Refugee Policies: Challenges and Responsibilities ........... 41 Silvano M. Tomasi FROM THE 1930s TO 1945 Wolf Kaiser Introduction ............................................... 49 Susanne Heim The Attitude of the US and Europe to the Jewish Refugees from Nazi Germany .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Despite All Odds, They Survived, Persisted — and Thrived Despite All Odds, They Survived, Persisted — and Thrived
    The Hidden® Child VOL. XXVII 2019 PUBLISHED BY HIDDEN CHILD FOUNDATION /ADL DESPITE ALL ODDS, THEY SURVIVED, PERSISTED — AND THRIVED DESPITE ALL ODDS, THEY SURVIVED, PERSISTED — AND THRIVED FROM HUNTED ESCAPEE TO FEARFUL REFUGEE: POLAND, 1935-1946 Anna Rabkin hen the mass slaughter of Jews ended, the remnants’ sole desire was to go 3 back to ‘normalcy.’ Children yearned for the return of their parents and their previous family life. For most child survivors, this wasn’t to be. As WEva Fogelman says, “Liberation was not an exhilarating moment. To learn that one is all alone in the world is to move from one nightmarish world to another.” A MISCHLING’S STORY Anna Rabkin writes, “After years of living with fear and deprivation, what did I imagine Maren Friedman peace would bring? Foremost, I hoped it would mean the end of hunger and a return to 9 school. Although I clutched at the hope that our parents would return, the fatalistic per- son I had become knew deep down it was improbable.” Maren Friedman, a mischling who lived openly with her sister and Jewish mother in wartime Germany states, “My father, who had been captured by the Russians and been a prisoner of war in Siberia, MY LIFE returned to Kiel in 1949. I had yearned for his return and had the fantasy that now that Rivka Pardes Bimbaum the war was over and he was home, all would be well. That was not the way it turned out.” Rebecca Birnbaum had both her parents by war’s end. She was able to return to 12 school one month after the liberation of Brussels, and to this day, she considers herself among the luckiest of all hidden children.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Remembrance and Representation Documentation from a Research Conference
    Holocaust Remembrance and Representation Documentation from a Research Conference Research anthology of the Inquiry on a Museum about the Holocaust Stockholm 2020 Swedish Government Official Reports SOU 2020:21 Layout: Committee Service Unit, Government Offices of Sweden Cover: Elanders Sverige AB Printed by: Elanders Sverige AB, Stockholm 2020 ISBN 978-91-38-25044-0 ISSN 0375-250X Preface This anthology is the documentation from the international research conference on Holocaust remembrance and representation held in Stockholm in February 12–13 2020 arranged by the Inquiry on a Museum about the Holocaust (Ku 2019:01). It contains the keynotes and papers presented at the conference as well as summaries of the panel discussions. The conference was an important input for the inquiry in putting together its report. The mission of the inquiry was to propose how a museum to pre- serve the memory of the Holocaust in Sweden should be established. The terms of reference for the inquiry points out that stories from survivors with a connection to Sweden should be of central impor- tance. The museum should also be able to describe the Holocaust in a broad historical context as well as Sweden’s role during the Second World War. The museum should have a strong foundation in current research on the Second World War and the Holocaust, and establish international networks, both within research and with other museums focused on the Holocaust. One important part of the task was to gather knowledge and infor- mation from scholars, museums, government authorities, civil society and other organizations currently working on issues relating to the Holocaust, in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II, Shoah and Genocide
    International Conference “The Holocaust: Remembrance and Lessons” 4 - 5 July 2006, Riga, Latvia Evening lecture at the Big Hall of Latvian University The Holocaust in its European Context Yehuda Bauer Allow me please, at the outset, to place the cart firmly before the horse, and set before you the justification for this paper, and in a sense, its conclusion. The Holocaust – Shoah – has to be seen in its various contexts. One context is that of Jewish history and civilisation, another is that of antisemitism, another is that of European and world history and civilisation. There are two other contexts, and they are very important: the context of World War II, and the context of genocide, and they are connected. Obviously, without the war, it is unlikely that there would have been a genocide of the Jews, and the war developments were decisive in the unfolding of the tragedy. Conversely, it is increasingly recognized today that while one has to understand the military, political, economic, and social elements as they developed during the period, the hard core, so to speak, of the World War, its centre in the sense of its overall cultural and civilisational impact, were the Nazi crimes, and first and foremost the genocide of the Jews which we call the Holocaust, or Shoah. The other context that I am discussing here is that of genocide – again, obviously, the Holocaust was a form of genocide. If so, the relationship between the Holocaust and other genocides or forms of genocide are crucial to the understanding of that particular tragedy, and of its specific and universal aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Memorial Days an Overview of Remembrance and Education in the OSCE Region
    Holocaust Memorial Days An overview of remembrance and education in the OSCE region 27 January 2015 Updated October 2015 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Albania ................................................................................................................................. 13 Andorra ................................................................................................................................. 14 Armenia ................................................................................................................................ 16 Austria .................................................................................................................................. 17 Azerbaijan ............................................................................................................................ 19 Belarus .................................................................................................................................. 21 Belgium ................................................................................................................................ 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................................................... 25 Bulgaria ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Compendium of Good Practices
    1 Education Campaigning Showcases 20 powerful education initiatives and programmes developed to fight antisemitism, from across the world of European football. CompendiumRemembrance and A Commemoration of good practices Team Building Awards 2 What are you reading ? This Compendium of good practices showcases 20 power- ful education initiatives and programmes, developed to fight antisemitism, from across the world of European football. The Compendium is not the definitive list of all noteworthy initiatives, nor is it an evaluation of a selection of programmes which are considered to be the best which exist; its aim is, rather, to highlight some of the existing practices - from workshops to commemoration plaques and remembrance trips to online campaigns – in the hope they might spark interest and motivate clubs, associations, fan groups and other stakeholders within or associated with the football community to develop their own practices. The initiatives were selected as a result of research conducted by a group of eight researchers and experts from across Europe who were all part of the Changing the Chants project. They conducted desk research and interviewed stake- holders connected to these initiatives. As a result, for every initiative the Compendium provides project background and context and an overview of what took place. Due to the limited scope of this Compendium, it has not been possible to analyse all these good practices in great depth and, as such, readers of this Compendium are invited and encouraged to seek out further information where further detail has not been provided. Categorization The practices have been categorised against five overarching themes: Campaigning (1), Education (2), Remembrance and com- memoration (3), Network building (4) and Awards (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Production, Myth and Misprision in Early Holocaust Cinema “L’Ebreo Errante” (Goffredo Alessandrini, 1948)
    Robert S. C. Gordon Production, Myth and Misprision in Early Holocaust Cinema “L’ebreo errante” (Goffredo Alessandrini, 1948) Abstract This essay examines the production, style and narrative mode of a highly significant, if until recently largely forgotten early Italian Holocaust film, Goffredo Alessandrini’s “L’ebreo errante” (“The Wandering Jew”, 1948), starring a young Vittorio Gassman and Valentina Cortese. The film is analysed as a hybrid work, through its production history in the disrupted setting of the post-war Roman film industry, through its aesthetics, and through its bold, although often incoherent attempts to address the emerging history of the concentration camps and the genocide of Europe’s Jews. Emphasis is placed on its very incoherence, its blindspots, clichés and contradictions, as well as on its occasionally sophisticated genre touches, and confident stylistic and formal tropes. These aspects are read together as powerfully emblematic of Italy’s confusions in the 1940s over its recent history and responsibilities for Fascism, the war and the Holocaust, and of the potential for cinema to address these profound historical questions. In the immediate months and years following liberation and the end of the war in 1945, the Italian film industry went through a period of instability, transition and reconstruc- tion just like the rest of the country, devastated and destabilized as it had been by the wars and civil wars since 1940, not to speak of more than two decades of dictatorship. 1 In parallel with the periodization of national politics, where the transition is conventionally seen as coming to an end with the bitterly fought parliamentary elections of April 1948, the post-war instability of the film industry can be given a terminus a quo at the emblem- atic re-opening of the Cinecittà film studios in Rome in 1948, following several years of 1 On the post-war film industry, cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 Points Total) PLEASE DO NO
    Mr. Huesken 10th Grade United States History II Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 points total) PLEASE DO NO WRITE ON THIS TEST DIRECTIONS – Please answer the following multiple-choice questions with the best possible answer. No answer will be used more than once. (45 questions @ 1 point each = 45 points) 1) All of the following were leaders of totalitarian governments in the 1930’s and 1940’s except: a. Joseph Stalin b. Francisco Franco. c. Benito Mussolini d. Neville Chamberlain. 2) In what country was the Fascist party and government formed? a. Italy b. Japan c. Spain d. Germany 3) The Battle of Britain forced Germany to do what to their war plans in Europe in 1942? a. Join the Axis powers. b. Fight a three-front war. c. Put off the invasion of Britain. d. Enter into a nonaggression pact with Britain. 4) The Nazis practiced genocide toward Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirable” peoples in Europe. What does the term “genocide” mean? a. Acting out of anti-Semitic beliefs. b. Deliberate extermination of a specific group of people. c. Terrorizing of the citizens of a nation by a government. d. Killing of people for the express purpose of creating terror. 5) The term “blitzkrieg” was a military strategy that depended on what? a. A system of fortifications. b. Out-waiting the opponent. c. Surprise and quick, overwhelming force. d. The ability to make a long, steady advance. 6) In an effort to avoid a second “world war”, when did the Britain and France adopt a policy of appeasement toward Germany? a.
    [Show full text]