Recent Shell-Model Investigation and Its Possible Role in Nuclear Structure Data Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

EPJ Web of Conferences 239, 04002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023904002 ND2019 Recent shell-model investigation and its possible role in nuclear structure data study 1, 1 1 1 1 Cenxi Yuan ∗, Yulin Ge , Menglan Liu , Guangshang Chen , and Boshuai Cai 1Sino-French Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, 519082, Guangdong, China Abstract. Up to now, the nuclear shell model is rarely used in the nuclear data study because of several reasons. First, medium and heavy mass nuclei far from the shell-model cores, normally doubly magic nuclei, require a huge amount of calculation resource even in a limited shell-model space. Second, large deformation is difficult to be described in the limited model space, which is based on spherical symmetry. Third, high precision evaluation of nuclear structure data challenges the ability of the shell model. Even so, it is worth starting preliminary nuclear data investigations based on the shell model. With the present computational ability, it is possible to investigate 1000 or more nuclei in the framework of the shell model, which should be helpful for nuclear data study. In the present work, some recent shell-model investigations are briefly introduced. Based on these works, a simple nuclear force is suggested to be used in the systematic nuclear structure data study. The south-west region of 132Sn is taken as an example to show the ability of such a simple nuclear force. 1 Introduction than 20 years ago. It is worth performing systematic com- parisons between the observed nuclear structure data and Nuclear data is one of the key connections between nu- the shell-model results. If the structure properties men- clear physics and its application in many fields. For ex- tioned above are well reproduced in the framework of the ample, both the investigations on the nucleosynthesis in shell model, the further predictions on the unknown prop- the universe and the chain reactions in the nuclear power erties should be more reliable. Besides structure proper- plant require high precision nuclear data, such as nuclear ties, SM can provide spectroscopic factors, which are im- structure data including masses, half-lives, levels, neutron portant to cross section study [6, 7]. separation energies, β decay properties, and ratios of de- In the present work, some of our recent shell-model layed neutrons. works will be firstly reviewed, including both the theoreti- However, many nuclei involved in the nucleosynthesis cal analysis and comparison with observations. Secondly, and fission products in the reactor are beyond the present the south-west region of 132Sn is taken as an example to experimental abilities. Therefore, many nuclear structure show the ability of a simple nuclear force on the descrip- data should be theoretically evaluated, such as the nuclear tion of observed levels. masses evaluated by the finite-range droplet model [1], the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov model [2], and the Weizsäcker- Skyrme mass model [3]. The nuclear shell model (SM) 2 Recent Shell-model Study in Light, with configuration mixing is one of the most important Medium, and Heavy Mass Nuclei models to understand the underlying physics of atomic nu- A Hamiltonian, YSOX, was suggested for psd region [8]. clei [4, 5]. In SM, the eigenvalues (binding energies) and The neutron drip line of the B, C, N, and O isotopes are re- the eigenstates (wave functions) of both the ground and produced by YSOX but not by the previous Hamiltonians excited states are obtained simultaneously through the di- WBT and WBP [9]. 22C was predicted to be rather weakly β agonalization process. The electromagnetic properties, bound through YSOX and confirmed by the later experi- decays, and many other properties can be further calcu- ment [11] and AME2012 [12]. The quadrupole deforma- lated with the wave functions. tion of 16C is well described by YSOX [10]. The radius of SM is used to understand the nuclear structure prop- two neutron halo nucleus, 22C, was investigated based on erties of the extreme neutron- and proton-rich nuclei ob- the YSOX configuration and the neutron-neutron interac- served in recent decades, but rarely used in the nuclear tion [13]. In YSOX, the cross-shell interaction, especially data study. One obvious reason is that the calculation cost its off-diagonal part, was reconsidered. It was shown that of the nuclear shell model is vast, if the number of valence the levels, electromagnetic transitions, and B(GT) values nucleons is large. Up to the present calculation limitation, 14 11 of C can be well described only with a 4 ω model space around 10 dimensions, it is possible to calculate 1000 or and a weaker off-diagonal interaction [14]. The recent ob- more nuclei through the shell model, which is much more served neutron cross-shell properties of 11,12Be are well re- ∗e-mail: [email protected] produced by YSOX [15–17]. It is expected to investigate © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). EPJ Web of Conferences 239, 04002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023904002 ND2019 the island of inversion in sdp f region, with the northern 208Pb, 207Tl, and 206Hg are well reproduced, which indi- boundary at 34Si [18], through a similar method. cates the proper description of the N=126 gap. In sd region, phenomenological Hamiltonians, USD [19], USDA and USDB [20], are very successful, while realistic Hamiltonians can be obtained through ab initio method and Vlow k approach [21]. All three Hamil- − tonians in USD family are isospin symmetric without any mirror energy differences (MED), which are generally rather small. But some MED in nuclei around A= 20 are very large because of the weakly bound effect due to the protons in 1s1/2 orbit [22, 23]. With the inclusion of such effect in both single-particle energies and two-body matrix elements, the modified USD family can well describe MED in nuclei around A= 20 [23]. The recently measured β decay properties are well described through the modified Hamiltonian for 22Si [24], 27S [25, 26], and 26P [27]. Figure 1. Root mean square of nearly 200 levels of isotopes and 132 208 In the medium mass region, the nuclei around 132Sn are isotones of Sn and Sn as the function of strength of C11, LS1, and T1 terms especially important in nuclear data study due to their im- portance in both nucleosynthesis through r-process in the universe and the reactions in the reactor. For example, fis- sion product yield has a peak in nuclei around A=140, of which the nuclear data contribute to the calculation of the present nuclear power plant [28]. The structure of 120,122I, 140Te, and 140I were investigated recently, showing proton- neutron bands and isomers in 120,122I [29, 30], the vibrator character of 140Te [31], and the suppression of the B(GT) from 140Te to 140I [32]. In addition, the monopole effect is shown to be important for the description of core excita- tion and B(GT) in A = 130 nuclei [33]. A Hamiltonian was suggested for the south-east re- gion of 132Sn [34]. Based on the nice description of the observed neutron separation energies and levels, 8 iso- mers were predicted [34]. A later publication reported the first observation of spectroscopic property in this region, + 132 21 state in Cd with excitation energy 618(8) keV [35], while our Hamiltonian gives 710 keV. Recently, a new iso- mer was found in 134In [36], which showed similar decay energy and transition strength to our prediction. In the heavy mass region, the nuclear data of actinides are important for the transmutation of minor actinides in spent fuel [37] and the power distribution inside fuel rods of a thermal reactor [38–40]. It is impossible for SM to calculate all nuclei in this region at present, but the prop- erties of nuclei close to 208Pb can be well reproduced. For example, the ground state spin parity of 223Np was ob- served with two possibilities, 9/2− and 7/2−, while SM 218 Figure 2. Upper panel: Root mean square of nearly 200 levels result supports the 9/2− [41]. The isomeric state of Pa of isotopes and isotones of 132Sn and 208Sn as the function of is recently observed [42], but the spins and parities of the strength of C10 term. Lower panel: Distribution of the strength ground and isomeric states can not be experimentally de- of C10 term. termined with the present statistics. Different to the sys- tematic trends of N= 127 isotones from 210Bi to 216Ac, which have 1− ground states and high spin (8− or 9−) iso- 218 mers, the ground and isomeric states of Pa are suggested 3 Applied VMU to Nuclear Structure Data to be 8− and 1− states, respectively, based on SM results Study [42]. A new Hamiltonian for the south region of 208Pb is under preparation, which described 45 observed binding Monopole based universal interaction, VMU, is suggested energies within a root mean square (RMS) 0.09 MeV [43]. through the monopole properties of central and tensor 209 In addition, the neutron core excitation states of Pb, force [44]. VMU plus spin-orbit interaction from M3Y 2 EPJ Web of Conferences 239, 04002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023904002 ND2019 126 130 208 207 206 Observed and calculated levels of − Sn and the island of inversion in sdp f region, with the northern Pb, Tl, and Hg are well reproduced, which indi- (VMU+LS) is used as the cross-shell interaction in many Table 1.
Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:Nucl-Th/0402046V1 13 Feb 2004

    Arxiv:Nucl-Th/0402046V1 13 Feb 2004

    The Shell Model as Unified View of Nuclear Structure E. Caurier,1, ∗ G. Mart´ınez-Pinedo,2,3, † F. Nowacki,1, ‡ A. Poves,4, § and A. P. Zuker1, ¶ 1Institut de Recherches Subatomiques, IN2P3-CNRS, Universit´eLouis Pasteur, F-67037 Strasbourg, France 2Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya, Edifici Nexus, Gran Capit`a2, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain 3Instituci´oCatalana de Recerca i Estudis Avan¸cats, Llu´ıs Companys 23, E-08010 Barcelona, Spain 4Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica, Universidad Aut´onoma, Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain (Dated: October 23, 2018) The last decade has witnessed both quantitative and qualitative progresses in Shell Model stud- ies, which have resulted in remarkable gains in our understanding of the structure of the nucleus. Indeed, it is now possible to diagonalize matrices in determinantal spaces of dimensionality up to 109 using the Lanczos tridiagonal construction, whose formal and numerical aspects we will analyze. Besides, many new approximation methods have been developed in order to overcome the dimensionality limitations. Furthermore, new effective nucleon-nucleon interactions have been constructed that contain both two and three-body contributions. The former are derived from realistic potentials (i.e., consistent with two nucleon data). The latter incorporate the pure monopole terms necessary to correct the bad saturation and shell-formation properties of the real- istic two-body forces. This combination appears to solve a number of hitherto puzzling problems. In the present review we will concentrate on those results which illustrate the global features of the approach: the universality of the effective interaction and the capacity of the Shell Model to describe simultaneously all the manifestations of the nuclear dynamics either of single particle or collective nature.
  • Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source Via Polarimetry Measurements

    Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source Via Polarimetry Measurements

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2017 Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source via Polarimetry Measurements Connor Miller Gautam University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Nuclear Commons Recommended Citation Gautam, Connor Miller, "Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source via Polarimetry Measurements. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4741 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Connor Miller Gautam entitled "Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source via Polarimetry Measurements." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Physics. Geoffrey Greene, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Marianne Breinig, Nadia Fomin Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source via Polarimetry Measurements A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Connor Miller Gautam May 2017 c by Connor Miller Gautam, 2017 All Rights Reserved.
  • Nuclear Models: Shell Model

    Nuclear Models: Shell Model

    LectureLecture 33 NuclearNuclear models:models: ShellShell modelmodel WS2012/13 : ‚Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics ‘, Part I 1 NuclearNuclear modelsmodels Nuclear models Models with strong interaction between Models of non-interacting the nucleons nucleons Liquid drop model Fermi gas model ααα-particle model Optical model Shell model … … Nucleons interact with the nearest Nucleons move freely inside the nucleus: neighbors and practically don‘t move: mean free path λ ~ R A nuclear radius mean free path λ << R A nuclear radius 2 III.III. ShellShell modelmodel 3 ShellShell modelmodel Magic numbers: Nuclides with certain proton and/or neutron numbers are found to be exceptionally stable. These so-called magic numbers are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126 — The doubly magic nuclei: — Nuclei with magic proton or neutron number have an unusually large number of stable or long lived nuclides . — A nucleus with a magic neutron (proton) number requires a lot of energy to separate a neutron (proton) from it. — A nucleus with one more neutron (proton) than a magic number is very easy to separate. — The first exitation level is very high : a lot of energy is needed to excite such nuclei — The doubly magic nuclei have a spherical form Nucleons are arranged into complete shells within the atomic nucleus 4 ExcitationExcitation energyenergy forfor magicm nuclei 5 NuclearNuclear potentialpotential The energy spectrum is defined by the nuclear potential solution of Schrödinger equation for a realistic potential The nuclear force is very short-ranged => the form of the potential follows the density distribution of the nucleons within the nucleus: for very light nuclei (A < 7), the nucleon distribution has Gaussian form (corresponding to a harmonic oscillator potential ) for heavier nuclei it can be parameterised by a Fermi distribution.
  • Interaction of Neutrons with Matter

    Interaction of Neutrons with Matter

    Interaction of Neutrons With Matter § Neutrons interactions depends on energies: from > 100 MeV to < 1 eV § Neutrons are uncharged particles: Þ No interaction with atomic electrons of material Þ interaction with the nuclei of these atoms § The nuclear force, leading to these interactions, is very short ranged Þ neutrons have to pass close to a nucleus to be able to interact ≈ 10-13 cm (nucleus radius) § Because of small size of the nucleus in relation to the atom, neutrons have low probability of interaction Þ long travelling distances in matter See Krane, Segre’, … While bound neutrons in stable nuclei are stable, FREE neutrons are unstable; they undergo beta decay with a lifetime of just under 15 minutes n ® p + e- +n tn = 885.7 ± 0.8 s ≈ 14.76 min Long life times Þ before decaying possibility to interact Þ n physics … x Free neutrons are produced in nuclear fission and fusion x Dedicated neutron sources like research reactors and spallation sources produce free neutrons for the use in irradiation neutron scattering exp. 33 N.B. Vita media del protone: tp > 1.6*10 anni età dell’universo: (13.72 ± 0,12) × 109 anni. beta decay can only occur with bound protons The neutron lifetime puzzle From 2016 Istitut Laue-Langevin (ILL, Grenoble) Annual Report A. Serebrov et al., Phys. Lett. B 605 (2005) 72 A.T. Yue et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 222501 Z. Berezhiani and L. Bento, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 081801 G.L. Greene and P. Geltenbort, Sci. Am. 314 (2016) 36 A discrepancy of more than 8 seconds !!!! https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/neutro
  • 14. Structure of Nuclei Particle and Nuclear Physics

    14. Structure of Nuclei Particle and Nuclear Physics

    14. Structure of Nuclei Particle and Nuclear Physics Dr. Tina Potter Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 1 In this section... Magic Numbers The Nuclear Shell Model Excited States Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 2 Magic Numbers Magic Numbers = 2; 8; 20; 28; 50; 82; 126... Nuclei with a magic number of Z and/or N are particularly stable, e.g. Binding energy per nucleon is large for magic numbers Doubly magic nuclei are especially stable. Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 3 Magic Numbers Other notable behaviour includes Greater abundance of isotopes and isotones for magic numbers e.g. Z = 20 has6 stable isotopes (average=2) Z = 50 has 10 stable isotopes (average=4) Odd A nuclei have small quadrupole moments when magic First excited states for magic nuclei higher than neighbours Large energy release in α, β decay when the daughter nucleus is magic Spontaneous neutron emitters have N = magic + 1 Nuclear radius shows only small change with Z, N at magic numbers. etc... etc... Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 4 Magic Numbers Analogy with atomic behaviour as electron shells fill. Atomic case - reminder Electrons move independently in central potential V (r) ∼ 1=r (Coulomb field of nucleus). Shells filled progressively according to Pauli exclusion principle. Chemical properties of an atom defined by valence (unpaired) electrons. Energy levels can be obtained (to first order) by solving Schr¨odinger equation for central potential. 1 E = n = principle quantum number n n2 Shell closure gives noble gas atoms. Are magic nuclei analogous to the noble gas atoms? Dr.
  • 1663-29-Othernuclearreaction.Pdf

    1663-29-Othernuclearreaction.Pdf

    it’s not fission or fusion. It’s not alpha, beta, or gamma dosimeter around his neck to track his exposure to radiation decay, nor any other nuclear reaction normally discussed in in the lab. And when he’s not in the lab, he can keep tabs on his an introductory physics textbook. Yet it is responsible for various experiments simultaneously from his office computer the existence of more than two thirds of the elements on the with not one or two but five widescreen monitors—displaying periodic table and is virtually ubiquitous anywhere nuclear graphs and computer codes without a single pixel of unused reactions are taking place—in nuclear reactors, nuclear bombs, space. Data printouts pinned to the wall on the left side of the stellar cores, and supernova explosions. office and techno-scribble densely covering the whiteboard It’s neutron capture, in which a neutron merges with an on the right side testify to a man on a mission: developing, or atomic nucleus. And at first blush, it may even sound deserving at least contributing to, a detailed understanding of complex of its relative obscurity, since neutrons are electrically neutral. atomic nuclei. For that, he’ll need to collect and tabulate a lot For example, add a neutron to carbon’s most common isotope, of cold, hard data. carbon-12, and you just get carbon-13. It’s slightly heavier than Mosby’s primary experimental apparatus for doing this carbon-12, but in terms of how it looks and behaves, the two is the Detector for Advanced Neutron Capture Experiments are essentially identical.
  • Nuclear Physics: the ISOLDE Facility

    Nuclear Physics: the ISOLDE Facility

    Nuclear physics: the ISOLDE facility Lecture 1: Nuclear physics Magdalena Kowalska CERN, EP-Dept. [email protected] on behalf of the CERN ISOLDE team www.cern.ch/isolde Outline Aimed at both physics and non-physics students This lecture: Introduction to nuclear physics Key dates and terms Forces inside atomic nuclei Nuclear landscape Nuclear decay General properties of nuclei Nuclear models Open questions in nuclear physics Lecture 2: CERN-ISOLDE facility Elements of a Radioactive Ion Beam Facility Lecture 3: Physics of ISOLDE Examples of experimental setups and results 2 Small quiz 1 What is Hulk’s connection to the topic of these lectures? Replies should be sent to [email protected] Prize: part of ISOLDE facility 3 Nuclear scale Matter Crystal Atom Atomic nucleus Macroscopic Nucleon Quark Angstrom Nuclear physics: femtometer studies the properties of nuclei and the interactions inside and between them 4 and with a matching theoretical effort theoretical a matching with and facilities experimental dedicated many with better and better it know to getting are we but Today Becquerel, discovery of radioactivity Skłodowska-Curie and Curie, isolation of radium : the exact form of the nuclear interaction is still not known, known, not still is interaction of nuclearthe form exact the : Known nuclides Known Chadwick, neutron discovered History 5 Goeppert-Meyer, Jensen, Haxel, Suess, nuclear shell model first studies on short-lived nuclei Discovery of 1-proton decay Discovery of halo nuclei Discovery of 2-proton decay Calculations with
  • Low-Energy Nuclear Physics Part 2: Low-Energy Nuclear Physics

    Low-Energy Nuclear Physics Part 2: Low-Energy Nuclear Physics

    BNL-113453-2017-JA White paper on nuclear astrophysics and low-energy nuclear physics Part 2: Low-energy nuclear physics Mark A. Riley, Charlotte Elster, Joe Carlson, Michael P. Carpenter, Richard Casten, Paul Fallon, Alexandra Gade, Carl Gross, Gaute Hagen, Anna C. Hayes, Douglas W. Higinbotham, Calvin R. Howell, Charles J. Horowitz, Kate L. Jones, Filip G. Kondev, Suzanne Lapi, Augusto Macchiavelli, Elizabeth A. McCutchen, Joe Natowitz, Witold Nazarewicz, Thomas Papenbrock, Sanjay Reddy, Martin J. Savage, Guy Savard, Bradley M. Sherrill, Lee G. Sobotka, Mark A. Stoyer, M. Betty Tsang, Kai Vetter, Ingo Wiedenhoever, Alan H. Wuosmaa, Sherry Yennello Submitted to Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics January 13, 2017 National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP) (SC-26) Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No.DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
  • Range of Usefulness of Bethe's Semiempirical Nuclear Mass Formula

    Range of Usefulness of Bethe's Semiempirical Nuclear Mass Formula

    RANGE OF ..USEFULNESS OF BETHE' S SEMIEMPIRIC~L NUCLEAR MASS FORMULA by SEKYU OBH A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE COLLEGE in partial fulfillment or the requirements tor the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1956 TTPBOTTDI Redacted for Privacy lrrt rtllrt ?rsfirror of finrrtor Ia Ohrr;r ef lrJer Redacted for Privacy Redacted for Privacy 0hrtrurn of tohoot Om0qat OEt ttm Redacted for Privacy Dru of 0rrdnrtr Sohdbl Drta thrrlr tr prrrEtrl %.ifh , 1,,r, ," r*(,-. ttpo{ by Brtty Drvlr ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Dr. G. L. Trigg for his assistance and encouragement, without which this study would not have been concluded. The author also wishes to thank Dr. E. A. Yunker for making facilities available for these calculations• • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 NUCLEAR BINDING ENERGIES AND 5 SEMIEMPIRICAL MASS FORMULA RESEARCH PROCEDURE 11 RESULTS 17 CONCLUSION 21 DATA 29 f BIBLIOGRAPHY 37 RANGE OF USEFULNESS OF BETHE'S SEMIEMPIRICAL NUCLEAR MASS FORMULA INTRODUCTION The complicated experimental results on atomic nuclei haYe been defying definite interpretation of the structure of atomic nuclei for a long tfme. Even though Yarious theoretical methods have been suggested, based upon the particular aspects of experimental results, it has been impossible to find a successful theory which suffices to explain the whole observed properties of atomic nuclei. In 1936, Bohr (J, P• 344) proposed the liquid drop model of atomic nuclei to explain the resonance capture process or nuclear reactions. The experimental evidences which support the liquid drop model are as follows: 1. Substantially constant density of nuclei with radius R - R Al/3 - 0 (1) where A is the mass number of the nucleus and R is the constant of proportionality 0 with the value of (1.5! 0.1) x 10-lJcm~ 2.
  • Nuclear Physics

    Nuclear Physics

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology 22.02 INTRODUCTION to APPLIED NUCLEAR PHYSICS Spring 2012 Prof. Paola Cappellaro Nuclear Science and Engineering Department [This page intentionally blank.] 2 Contents 1 Introduction to Nuclear Physics 5 1.1 Basic Concepts ..................................................... 5 1.1.1 Terminology .................................................. 5 1.1.2 Units, dimensions and physical constants .................................. 6 1.1.3 Nuclear Radius ................................................ 6 1.2 Binding energy and Semi-empirical mass formula .................................. 6 1.2.1 Binding energy ................................................. 6 1.2.2 Semi-empirical mass formula ......................................... 7 1.2.3 Line of Stability in the Chart of nuclides ................................... 9 1.3 Radioactive decay ................................................... 11 1.3.1 Alpha decay ................................................... 11 1.3.2 Beta decay ................................................... 13 1.3.3 Gamma decay ................................................. 15 1.3.4 Spontaneous fission ............................................... 15 1.3.5 Branching Ratios ................................................ 15 2 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics 17 2.1 Laws of Quantum Mechanics ............................................. 17 2.2 States, observables and eigenvalues ......................................... 18 2.2.1 Properties of eigenfunctions .........................................
  • The R-Process of Stellar Nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and Nuclear Physics Achievements and Mysteries

    The R-Process of Stellar Nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and Nuclear Physics Achievements and Mysteries

    The r-process of stellar nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and nuclear physics achievements and mysteries M. Arnould, S. Goriely, and K. Takahashi Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique, Universit´eLibre de Bruxelles, CP226, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Abstract The r-process, or the rapid neutron-capture process, of stellar nucleosynthesis is called for to explain the production of the stable (and some long-lived radioac- tive) neutron-rich nuclides heavier than iron that are observed in stars of various metallicities, as well as in the solar system. A very large amount of nuclear information is necessary in order to model the r-process. This concerns the static characteristics of a large variety of light to heavy nuclei between the valley of stability and the vicinity of the neutron-drip line, as well as their beta-decay branches or their reactivity. Fission probabilities of very neutron-rich actinides have also to be known in order to determine the most massive nuclei that have a chance to be involved in the r-process. Even the properties of asymmetric nuclear matter may enter the problem. The enormously challenging experimental and theoretical task imposed by all these requirements is reviewed, and the state-of-the-art development in the field is presented. Nuclear-physics-based and astrophysics-free r-process models of different levels of sophistication have been constructed over the years. We review their merits and their shortcomings. The ultimate goal of r-process studies is clearly to identify realistic sites for the development of the r-process. Here too, the challenge is enormous, and the solution still eludes us.
  • Fundamental Nuclear Physics Research with the Nab Experiment at Oak Ridge National Laboratory J

    Fundamental Nuclear Physics Research with the Nab Experiment at Oak Ridge National Laboratory J

    Fundamental Nuclear Physics Research with the Nab Experiment at Oak Ridge National Laboratory J. Hamblen The Nab experiment (http://nab.phys.virginia.edu/) is a nuclear physics experiment at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is installed at the Fundamental Neutron Physics Beamline at the Spallation Neutron Source at ORNL. The goal of the experiment is to conduct precision − measurements of the neutron beta decay reaction 푛 → 푝 + 푒 + 휈푒̅ at unprecedented levels. The Spallation Neutron Source (SPS) at ORNL is a world-class facility for neutron physics research and currently provides the most intense beam of neutrons in the world. The Nab experiment will trap the proton and electron produced in the beta decay process, and a spectrometer will measure their energy and momentum. Correlation measurements between the electron energy and proton momentum will provide key tests of the standard model of particle physics and yield a deeper understanding of the weak nuclear force. Installation of the experiment is currently underway, and data collection is expected to begin in 2021. Interested students will have the unique opportunity to participate in the commissioning of the experiment as well as data collection at ORNL. At the same time, data analysis and simulation of the detector using the C++ and GEANT4 software packages will occur using the supercomputing resources at UTC’s SimCenter. Overall, students will gain first-hand experience working with a collaboration of scientists from around the world on a cutting-edge nuclear physics experiment. UTC students performing leak tests of the Nab cryostat system at ORNL. .