Nuclear Physics: the ISOLDE Facility
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source Via Polarimetry Measurements
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2017 Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source via Polarimetry Measurements Connor Miller Gautam University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Nuclear Commons Recommended Citation Gautam, Connor Miller, "Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source via Polarimetry Measurements. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4741 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Connor Miller Gautam entitled "Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source via Polarimetry Measurements." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Physics. Geoffrey Greene, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Marianne Breinig, Nadia Fomin Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Probing Pulse Structure at the Spallation Neutron Source via Polarimetry Measurements A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Connor Miller Gautam May 2017 c by Connor Miller Gautam, 2017 All Rights Reserved. -
Nuclear Models: Shell Model
LectureLecture 33 NuclearNuclear models:models: ShellShell modelmodel WS2012/13 : ‚Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics ‘, Part I 1 NuclearNuclear modelsmodels Nuclear models Models with strong interaction between Models of non-interacting the nucleons nucleons Liquid drop model Fermi gas model ααα-particle model Optical model Shell model … … Nucleons interact with the nearest Nucleons move freely inside the nucleus: neighbors and practically don‘t move: mean free path λ ~ R A nuclear radius mean free path λ << R A nuclear radius 2 III.III. ShellShell modelmodel 3 ShellShell modelmodel Magic numbers: Nuclides with certain proton and/or neutron numbers are found to be exceptionally stable. These so-called magic numbers are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126 — The doubly magic nuclei: — Nuclei with magic proton or neutron number have an unusually large number of stable or long lived nuclides . — A nucleus with a magic neutron (proton) number requires a lot of energy to separate a neutron (proton) from it. — A nucleus with one more neutron (proton) than a magic number is very easy to separate. — The first exitation level is very high : a lot of energy is needed to excite such nuclei — The doubly magic nuclei have a spherical form Nucleons are arranged into complete shells within the atomic nucleus 4 ExcitationExcitation energyenergy forfor magicm nuclei 5 NuclearNuclear potentialpotential The energy spectrum is defined by the nuclear potential solution of Schrödinger equation for a realistic potential The nuclear force is very short-ranged => the form of the potential follows the density distribution of the nucleons within the nucleus: for very light nuclei (A < 7), the nucleon distribution has Gaussian form (corresponding to a harmonic oscillator potential ) for heavier nuclei it can be parameterised by a Fermi distribution. -
Studies on Different Halo Nuclei Models
ISSN: 2347-3215 Volume 2 Number 3 (March-2013) pp. 169-173 www.ijcrar.com Studies on different halo nuclei models B.M.Fulmante1* and Sharma Umashankar2 1Head, Department of Physics, Sanjeevani Mahavidyalaya , Chapoli, Dist. Latur (M.S), India 2RJIT, BSF, Tekanpur, Gwalior (M.P.), India *Corresponding author KEYWORDS A B S T R A C T Halo nuclei; In the present work were showed different existing halo nuclei models and Carbon-22, compared their results. It also includes the necessity of the research on the Borromean ring; halo nuclei. Previous Discovery, Recent discovery and the remarkable points Li halo; about the limitations in the research. The differences in the properties of halo Oxygen-23; nuclei are also concluded in paper. The study of heaviest halo carbon22 Be, He, and calcium; nuclei, Be, He, Oxygen23 and calcium are also incorporated in the present Magic isotopes etc. study. This paper also includes Historical back ground. Recent discovery of the Heaviest Halo carbon nuclei-22, Comparative description of Be, He, Halo Oxygen23 and calcium etc. Introduction Halo nuclei are very weakly-bound exotic halo nucleons tend to be in low relative states of nuclear matter in which the outer orbital. The field of halo nuclei represents a one or two valence nucleons (usually paradigm shift in the study of nuclear neutrons) are spatially decoupled from a structure and is still regarded as a hot relatively tightly bound core such that they topic almost twenty years after their spend more than half their time beyond the discovery. But when did the field actually range of the binding nuclear potential. -
Interaction of Neutrons with Matter
Interaction of Neutrons With Matter § Neutrons interactions depends on energies: from > 100 MeV to < 1 eV § Neutrons are uncharged particles: Þ No interaction with atomic electrons of material Þ interaction with the nuclei of these atoms § The nuclear force, leading to these interactions, is very short ranged Þ neutrons have to pass close to a nucleus to be able to interact ≈ 10-13 cm (nucleus radius) § Because of small size of the nucleus in relation to the atom, neutrons have low probability of interaction Þ long travelling distances in matter See Krane, Segre’, … While bound neutrons in stable nuclei are stable, FREE neutrons are unstable; they undergo beta decay with a lifetime of just under 15 minutes n ® p + e- +n tn = 885.7 ± 0.8 s ≈ 14.76 min Long life times Þ before decaying possibility to interact Þ n physics … x Free neutrons are produced in nuclear fission and fusion x Dedicated neutron sources like research reactors and spallation sources produce free neutrons for the use in irradiation neutron scattering exp. 33 N.B. Vita media del protone: tp > 1.6*10 anni età dell’universo: (13.72 ± 0,12) × 109 anni. beta decay can only occur with bound protons The neutron lifetime puzzle From 2016 Istitut Laue-Langevin (ILL, Grenoble) Annual Report A. Serebrov et al., Phys. Lett. B 605 (2005) 72 A.T. Yue et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 222501 Z. Berezhiani and L. Bento, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 081801 G.L. Greene and P. Geltenbort, Sci. Am. 314 (2016) 36 A discrepancy of more than 8 seconds !!!! https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/neutro -
14. Structure of Nuclei Particle and Nuclear Physics
14. Structure of Nuclei Particle and Nuclear Physics Dr. Tina Potter Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 1 In this section... Magic Numbers The Nuclear Shell Model Excited States Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 2 Magic Numbers Magic Numbers = 2; 8; 20; 28; 50; 82; 126... Nuclei with a magic number of Z and/or N are particularly stable, e.g. Binding energy per nucleon is large for magic numbers Doubly magic nuclei are especially stable. Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 3 Magic Numbers Other notable behaviour includes Greater abundance of isotopes and isotones for magic numbers e.g. Z = 20 has6 stable isotopes (average=2) Z = 50 has 10 stable isotopes (average=4) Odd A nuclei have small quadrupole moments when magic First excited states for magic nuclei higher than neighbours Large energy release in α, β decay when the daughter nucleus is magic Spontaneous neutron emitters have N = magic + 1 Nuclear radius shows only small change with Z, N at magic numbers. etc... etc... Dr. Tina Potter 14. Structure of Nuclei 4 Magic Numbers Analogy with atomic behaviour as electron shells fill. Atomic case - reminder Electrons move independently in central potential V (r) ∼ 1=r (Coulomb field of nucleus). Shells filled progressively according to Pauli exclusion principle. Chemical properties of an atom defined by valence (unpaired) electrons. Energy levels can be obtained (to first order) by solving Schr¨odinger equation for central potential. 1 E = n = principle quantum number n n2 Shell closure gives noble gas atoms. Are magic nuclei analogous to the noble gas atoms? Dr. -
1663-29-Othernuclearreaction.Pdf
it’s not fission or fusion. It’s not alpha, beta, or gamma dosimeter around his neck to track his exposure to radiation decay, nor any other nuclear reaction normally discussed in in the lab. And when he’s not in the lab, he can keep tabs on his an introductory physics textbook. Yet it is responsible for various experiments simultaneously from his office computer the existence of more than two thirds of the elements on the with not one or two but five widescreen monitors—displaying periodic table and is virtually ubiquitous anywhere nuclear graphs and computer codes without a single pixel of unused reactions are taking place—in nuclear reactors, nuclear bombs, space. Data printouts pinned to the wall on the left side of the stellar cores, and supernova explosions. office and techno-scribble densely covering the whiteboard It’s neutron capture, in which a neutron merges with an on the right side testify to a man on a mission: developing, or atomic nucleus. And at first blush, it may even sound deserving at least contributing to, a detailed understanding of complex of its relative obscurity, since neutrons are electrically neutral. atomic nuclei. For that, he’ll need to collect and tabulate a lot For example, add a neutron to carbon’s most common isotope, of cold, hard data. carbon-12, and you just get carbon-13. It’s slightly heavier than Mosby’s primary experimental apparatus for doing this carbon-12, but in terms of how it looks and behaves, the two is the Detector for Advanced Neutron Capture Experiments are essentially identical. -
Nuclear Charge Radius Determination of the Halo Nucleus Be-11
Nuclear charge radius determination of the halo nucleus Be-11 Monika Žáková, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz 6 7 2 3 1 1 1 M. Bissell , K. Blaum , Ch. Geppert , M. Kowalska , J. Krämer , A. Krieger , R. Neugart , W. Nörtershäuser1,2 , R. Sanchez1, F. Schmidt-Kaler4, D. Tiedemann1, D. Yordanov7, C. Zimmermann5 1 Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany Laser Spectroscopy of Highly Charged 2 GSI Darmstadt, Germany Ions and Exotic Radioactive Nuclei 3 CERN (Helmholtz Young Investigators Group) 4 Universität Ulm, Germany 5 Eberhard-Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany 6 Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, Leuven 7Max Planck Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg http://www.kernchemie.uni-mainz.de/laser/ Outline ► Halo Nuclei ► Isotope Shift ► Collinear Laser Spectroscopy ► Results Halo Nuclei 3 Isotope Shift → Nuclear Charge Radius ► Charge radius – proton distribution ► Nuclear model – independent Isotop 1 Δν Absorption IS spectra Isotop 2 ΔνIS = ΔνMS + ΔνFS 4 Isotope Shift ΔνIS = ΔνMS + ΔνFS meausrements calculations charge radius ≈10 GHz ≈1 MHz ► Calculations up to three e- system Be+ Z.-C. Yan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 243002 (2008) M. Puchalski, K. Pachucki Phys. Rev A 78, 052511 (2008) 5 Isotope Shift ΔνIS = ΔνMS + ΔνFS meausrements calculations charge radius ≈10 GHz ≈1 MHz r 2 Δν = 2πZeΔ|ψ(0)|2 2 FS 3 δ r V(r) field shift coefficient C - calculations Z.-C. Yan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 243002 (2008) M. Puchalski, K. Pachucki Phys. Rev A 78, 052511 (2008) 6 6He, 8He ► 6He, 8He – isotope shifts measurements in magneto optical trap, Argonne National Lab, GANIL P. Müller et al., Phys. Rev. -
Arxiv:2001.01849V2 [Nucl-Th] 21 Feb 2020 Rich Medium-Mass Isotopes of Ne, Na and Mg [4]
Exploring two-neutron halo formation in the ground-state of 29F within a three-body model Jagjit Singh,1, ∗ J. Casal,2, 3, y W. Horiuchi,4 L. Fortunato,2, 3 and A. Vitturi2, 3 1Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Osaka University, Ibaraki 567-0047, Japan 2Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia \G.Galilei", Universit`adegli Studi di Padova, via Marzolo 8, Padova, I-35131, Italy 3INFN-Sezione di Padova, via Marzolo 8, Padova, I-35131, Italy 4Department of Physics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan (Dated: February 24, 2020) Background: The 29F system is located at the lower-N boundary of the \island of inversion" and is an exotic, weakly bound system. Little is known about this system beyond its two-neutron separation energy (S2n) with large uncertainties. A similar situation is found for the low-lying spectrum of its unbound binary subsystem 28F. Purpose: To investigate the configuration mixing, matter radius and neutron-neutron correlations in the ground- state of 29F within a three-body model, exploring the possibility of 29F to be a two-neutron halo nucleus. Method: The 29F ground-state wave function is built within the hyperspherical formalism by using an analytical transformed harmonic oscillator basis. The Gogny-Pires-Tourreil (GPT) nn interaction with central, spin-orbit and tensor terms is employed in the present calculations, together with different core + n potentials constrained by the available experimental information on 28F. Results: The 29F ground-state configuration mixing and its matter radius are computed for different choices of 28 the F structure and S2n value. The admixture of d-waves with pf components are found to play an important role, favouring the dominance of dineutron configurations in the wave function. -
Range of Usefulness of Bethe's Semiempirical Nuclear Mass Formula
RANGE OF ..USEFULNESS OF BETHE' S SEMIEMPIRIC~L NUCLEAR MASS FORMULA by SEKYU OBH A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE COLLEGE in partial fulfillment or the requirements tor the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1956 TTPBOTTDI Redacted for Privacy lrrt rtllrt ?rsfirror of finrrtor Ia Ohrr;r ef lrJer Redacted for Privacy Redacted for Privacy 0hrtrurn of tohoot Om0qat OEt ttm Redacted for Privacy Dru of 0rrdnrtr Sohdbl Drta thrrlr tr prrrEtrl %.ifh , 1,,r, ," r*(,-. ttpo{ by Brtty Drvlr ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Dr. G. L. Trigg for his assistance and encouragement, without which this study would not have been concluded. The author also wishes to thank Dr. E. A. Yunker for making facilities available for these calculations• • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 NUCLEAR BINDING ENERGIES AND 5 SEMIEMPIRICAL MASS FORMULA RESEARCH PROCEDURE 11 RESULTS 17 CONCLUSION 21 DATA 29 f BIBLIOGRAPHY 37 RANGE OF USEFULNESS OF BETHE'S SEMIEMPIRICAL NUCLEAR MASS FORMULA INTRODUCTION The complicated experimental results on atomic nuclei haYe been defying definite interpretation of the structure of atomic nuclei for a long tfme. Even though Yarious theoretical methods have been suggested, based upon the particular aspects of experimental results, it has been impossible to find a successful theory which suffices to explain the whole observed properties of atomic nuclei. In 1936, Bohr (J, P• 344) proposed the liquid drop model of atomic nuclei to explain the resonance capture process or nuclear reactions. The experimental evidences which support the liquid drop model are as follows: 1. Substantially constant density of nuclei with radius R - R Al/3 - 0 (1) where A is the mass number of the nucleus and R is the constant of proportionality 0 with the value of (1.5! 0.1) x 10-lJcm~ 2. -
Nuclear Physics
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 22.02 INTRODUCTION to APPLIED NUCLEAR PHYSICS Spring 2012 Prof. Paola Cappellaro Nuclear Science and Engineering Department [This page intentionally blank.] 2 Contents 1 Introduction to Nuclear Physics 5 1.1 Basic Concepts ..................................................... 5 1.1.1 Terminology .................................................. 5 1.1.2 Units, dimensions and physical constants .................................. 6 1.1.3 Nuclear Radius ................................................ 6 1.2 Binding energy and Semi-empirical mass formula .................................. 6 1.2.1 Binding energy ................................................. 6 1.2.2 Semi-empirical mass formula ......................................... 7 1.2.3 Line of Stability in the Chart of nuclides ................................... 9 1.3 Radioactive decay ................................................... 11 1.3.1 Alpha decay ................................................... 11 1.3.2 Beta decay ................................................... 13 1.3.3 Gamma decay ................................................. 15 1.3.4 Spontaneous fission ............................................... 15 1.3.5 Branching Ratios ................................................ 15 2 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics 17 2.1 Laws of Quantum Mechanics ............................................. 17 2.2 States, observables and eigenvalues ......................................... 18 2.2.1 Properties of eigenfunctions ......................................... -
The R-Process of Stellar Nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and Nuclear Physics Achievements and Mysteries
The r-process of stellar nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and nuclear physics achievements and mysteries M. Arnould, S. Goriely, and K. Takahashi Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique, Universit´eLibre de Bruxelles, CP226, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Abstract The r-process, or the rapid neutron-capture process, of stellar nucleosynthesis is called for to explain the production of the stable (and some long-lived radioac- tive) neutron-rich nuclides heavier than iron that are observed in stars of various metallicities, as well as in the solar system. A very large amount of nuclear information is necessary in order to model the r-process. This concerns the static characteristics of a large variety of light to heavy nuclei between the valley of stability and the vicinity of the neutron-drip line, as well as their beta-decay branches or their reactivity. Fission probabilities of very neutron-rich actinides have also to be known in order to determine the most massive nuclei that have a chance to be involved in the r-process. Even the properties of asymmetric nuclear matter may enter the problem. The enormously challenging experimental and theoretical task imposed by all these requirements is reviewed, and the state-of-the-art development in the field is presented. Nuclear-physics-based and astrophysics-free r-process models of different levels of sophistication have been constructed over the years. We review their merits and their shortcomings. The ultimate goal of r-process studies is clearly to identify realistic sites for the development of the r-process. Here too, the challenge is enormous, and the solution still eludes us. -
Fundamental Nuclear Physics Research with the Nab Experiment at Oak Ridge National Laboratory J
Fundamental Nuclear Physics Research with the Nab Experiment at Oak Ridge National Laboratory J. Hamblen The Nab experiment (http://nab.phys.virginia.edu/) is a nuclear physics experiment at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is installed at the Fundamental Neutron Physics Beamline at the Spallation Neutron Source at ORNL. The goal of the experiment is to conduct precision − measurements of the neutron beta decay reaction 푛 → 푝 + 푒 + 휈푒̅ at unprecedented levels. The Spallation Neutron Source (SPS) at ORNL is a world-class facility for neutron physics research and currently provides the most intense beam of neutrons in the world. The Nab experiment will trap the proton and electron produced in the beta decay process, and a spectrometer will measure their energy and momentum. Correlation measurements between the electron energy and proton momentum will provide key tests of the standard model of particle physics and yield a deeper understanding of the weak nuclear force. Installation of the experiment is currently underway, and data collection is expected to begin in 2021. Interested students will have the unique opportunity to participate in the commissioning of the experiment as well as data collection at ORNL. At the same time, data analysis and simulation of the detector using the C++ and GEANT4 software packages will occur using the supercomputing resources at UTC’s SimCenter. Overall, students will gain first-hand experience working with a collaboration of scientists from around the world on a cutting-edge nuclear physics experiment. UTC students performing leak tests of the Nab cryostat system at ORNL. .