DOCSLIB.ORG

Larch Wood – a Literature Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Larch Wood – a Literature Review Larch wood – a literature review FOREST & LANDSCAPE WORKING PAPERS 23 / 2007 By Andreas Bergstedt and Christian Lyck (eds.) Title Larch wood – a literature review Authors Andreas Bergstedt and Christian Lyck (eds.) Publisher Forest & Landscape Denmark University of Copenhagen Hørsholm Kongevej 11 DK-2970 Hørsholm Tel. +45 3533 1500 Email [email protected] Series-title and no. Forest & Landscape Working Papers no. 23-2007 published on www.SL.life.ku.dk ISBN ISBN 978-87-7903-337-5 Citation Andreas Bergstedt and Christian Lyck (eds.). Larch wood – a literature review. Forest & Landscape Working Papers no. 23-2007. Forest & Landscape Denmark Citation allowed with clear source indication Written permission is required if you wish to use Forest & Landscape’s name and/or any part of this report for sales and advertising purposes. LARCH WOOD a literature review conducted for The Nordic Forest Research Co-operation Committee (SNS) Project no. SNS 80, March 2003 Contents: 1. Use and availability of Larch wood in Northern Europe p. 1 2. Sibirian Larch as raw material (Finland) p. 67 3. Properties and processing of Larch timber (Soviet / Russia) p. 87 1: Use and availability of Larch wood in Northern Europe - a literature review Christian Lyck & Andreas Bergstedt The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Unit of Forestry Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg Copenhagen, Denmark I II Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................................. III 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The need for research................................................................................................ 3 2. Taxonomy of larch.......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Description of the larch species ................................................................................ 4 2.1.1 Larix decidua (European larch): ........................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Larix sibirica (Siberian larch):........................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Larix gmelinii (Asian larch): ............................................................................. 7 2.1.4 Larix laricina (Tamarack): ................................................................................. 7 2.1.5 Larix kaempferi (Japanese larch):...................................................................... 8 2.1.6 Larix griffithiana (Sikkim larch):....................................................................... 9 2.1.7 Larix potaninii (Chinese larch):......................................................................... 9 2.1.8 Larix mastersiana (Masters larch):..................................................................... 9 2.1.9 Larix lyallii (Subalpine larch):........................................................................... 9 2.1.10 Larix occidentalis (Western larch):.................................................................. 9 2.1.11 Larix x eurolepis (Hybrid larch): ................................................................... 10 2.2 Concluding remarks................................................................................................ 10 3. The use of larch wood in the past and in the present.................................................... 11 3.1 Applications of larch wood..................................................................................... 11 3.2. The use of larch in the Nordic countries................................................................ 12 3.3. The use of larch in other European countries ........................................................ 12 3.4 Concluding remarks................................................................................................ 13 4. Availability ................................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Availability in the countries participating in the research project .......................... 14 4.1.1 Denmark:.......................................................................................................... 14 4.1.2 Finland: ............................................................................................................ 14 4.1.3 Iceland:............................................................................................................. 14 4.1.4 Lithuania: ......................................................................................................... 14 4.1.5 Norway:............................................................................................................ 15 4.1.6 Sweden:............................................................................................................ 15 4.2 Central European countries and Great Britain........................................................ 15 4.3. Concluding remarks:.............................................................................................. 16 5. Growth and yield........................................................................................................... 17 5.1 Growth of larch....................................................................................................... 17 5.1.1 Characteristics/differences between species and provenances: ....................... 18 5.1.2 Yield tables: ..................................................................................................... 22 5.2 Stem form................................................................................................................ 23 5.3 Branches.................................................................................................................. 24 5.4 Spiral grain.............................................................................................................. 24 5.5 Bark......................................................................................................................... 25 5.6 Heartwood development ......................................................................................... 26 5.7 Pathogens ................................................................................................................ 27 6. Wood properties............................................................................................................ 29 6.1. Physical properties................................................................................................. 29 III 6.1.1. The look/anatomy: .......................................................................................... 29 6.1.2 Density:............................................................................................................ 30 6.1.3. Shrinkage and drying properties:.................................................................... 31 6.1.4. Stability of larch wood:................................................................................... 33 6.2. Mechanical properties............................................................................................ 33 6.3. Working properties: ............................................................................................... 35 6.4 Resin and heartwood extractives: ........................................................................... 36 6.4.1. Resin: .............................................................................................................. 36 6.4.2 Heartwood extractives: .................................................................................... 36 6.5 Permeability ............................................................................................................ 38 7. Durability ...................................................................................................................... 39 7.1 Heartwood / sapwood ............................................................................................. 40 7.2. Larch in ground contact: ........................................................................................ 41 7.3 Larch above ground ................................................................................................ 42 7.4 Larch in contact with water..................................................................................... 43 7.5 Preservative treatment............................................................................................. 43 7.6 Concluding remarks................................................................................................ 44 8. Discussion..................................................................................................................... 45 8.1 Wood properties...................................................................................................... 45 8.2 Durability ................................................................................................................ 47 8.3 The present and future use of larch......................................................................... 48 Literature........................................................................................................................... 50 IV 1. Introduction During
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pinus Cembra
    Pinus cembra Pinus cembra in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats G. Caudullo, D. de Rigo Arolla or Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra L.) is a slow-growing, long lived conifer that grows at high altitudes (up to the treeline) with continental climate and is able to resist to very low winter temperature. It has large edible seeds which are dispersed principally by the European nutcracker. The timber is strong and of good quality but it is not a commercially important species because of its slow growth rate and frequent contorted shape. This pine is principally used to protect slopes and valleys against avalanches and soil erosion. In alpine habitats it is threatened principally by tourism development, even if the recent reduction of mountain pasture activities is allowing this pine to return in many areas. Pinus cembra L., known as Arolla pine or Swiss stone pine, is a slow growing, small to medium-sized evergreen conifer (10- Frequency 12 m height, occasionally 20-25 m), which can live up to 1000 < 25% 25% - 50% 1-5 years . The crown is densely conical when young, becoming 50% - 75% cylindrical and finally very open6. It grows commonly in a curved > 75% Chorology or contorted shape, but in protected areas can grow straight and Native to considerable sizes. Needles are in fascicles of five, 5-9 cm long1, 7. Arolla pine is a monoecious species and the pollination is driven by wind3. Seed cones appear after 40-60 years, they Seed cones are purplish in colour when maturing. are 4-8 cm long and mature in 2 years3, 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • Lvl) Having Different Patterns of Assembly
    PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com MECHANICAL PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER (LVL) HAVING DIFFERENT PATTERNS OF ASSEMBLY a,b a, Bing Xue, and Yingcheng Hu * Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) panels made from poplar (Populus ussuriensis Kom.) and birch (Betula platyphylla Suk.) veneers were tested for mechanical properties. The effects of the assembly pattern on the modulus of elasticity (MOE) and modulus of rupture (MOR) of the LVL with vertical load testing were investigated. Three analytical methods were used: composite material mechanics, computer simulation, and static testing. The reliability of the different LVL assembly patterns was assessed using the method of Monte-Carlo. The results showed that the theoretical and ANSYS analysis results of the LVL MOE and MOR were very close to those of the static test results, and the largest proportional error was not greater than 5%. The veneer amount was the same, but the strength and reliability of the LVL made of birch veneers on the top and bottom was much more than the LVL made of poplar veneers. Good assembly patterns can improve the utility value of wood. Keywords: Laminated veneer lumber (LVL); Mechanical properties; Assembly pattern; Reliability; Poplar; Birch Contact information: a: Key Laboratory of Bio-based Material Science and Technology of Ministry of Education of China, College of Material Science and Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China; b: Heilongjiang Institute of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150027, China; * Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Wood is a hard fibrous tissue found in many plants. It has many favorable properties such as its processing ability, physical and mechanical properties, and aesthetics, as well as being environmentally and health friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Baikal Russian Federation
    LAKE BAIKAL RUSSIAN FEDERATION Lake Baikal is in south central Siberia close to the Mongolian border. It is the largest, oldest by 20 million years, and deepest, at 1,638m, of the world's lakes. It is 3.15 million hectares in size and contains a fifth of the world's unfrozen surface freshwater. Its age and isolation and unusually fertile depths have given it the world's richest and most unusual lacustrine fauna which, like the Galapagos islands’, is of outstanding value to evolutionary science. The exceptional variety of endemic animals and plants make the lake one of the most biologically diverse on earth. Threats to the site: Present threats are the untreated wastes from the river Selenga, potential oil and gas exploration in the Selenga delta, widespread lake-edge pollution and over-hunting of the Baikal seals. However, the threat of an oil pipeline along the lake’s north shore was averted in 2006 by Presidential decree and the pulp and cellulose mill on the southern shore which polluted 200 sq. km of the lake, caused some of the worst air pollution in Russia and genetic mutations in some of the lake’s endemic species, was closed in 2009 as no longer profitable to run. COUNTRY Russian Federation NAME Lake Baikal NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1996: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria vii, viii, ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following statement at the time of inscription. Justification for Inscription The Committee inscribed Lake Baikal the most outstanding example of a freshwater ecosystem on the basis of: Criteria (vii), (viii), (ix) and (x).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of the Properties of Tamarack (Larix Laricina (Du Roi) K
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009 2014 Comparative analysis of the properties of tamarack (Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch) particleboard and thermally treated oriented strand board (OSB) Wang, Le http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/1637 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PROPERTIES OF TAMARACK {Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch) PARTICLEBOARD AND THERMALLY TREATED ORIENTED STRAND BOARD (OSB) Le Wang A thesis submitted to the faculty of graduate studies Lakehead University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Forestry Wood Science and Technology Lakehead University Copyright © Le Wang 2014 ProQuest Number: '10611966 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProOuest ProQuest 10611966 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition ® ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346 ABSTRACT Engineered wood products (EWPs), for example, particleboard and oriented strand board (OSB), are normally made from wood residuals or small particles of under- utilized wood species for replacing solid sawn products as its cost effective, more uniform, and a more efficient method of using available timber resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties of Western Larch and Their Relation to Uses of the Wood
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 285 MARCH, 1932 PROPERTIES OF WESTERN LARCH AND THEIR RELATION TO USES OF THE WOOD BY R. P. A. JOHNSON Engineer, Forest Products Laboratory AND M. I. BRADNER In Charge^ Office of Forest Products y Region I Branch of Research, Forest Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON, D. C. TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 285 MARCH, 1932 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D. C. PROPERTIES OF WESTERN LARCH AND THEIR RELATION TO USES OF THE WOOD By R. P. A. JOHNSON, Engineer, Forest Products Laboratory^^ and M. I. BRADNER, in Charge, Office of Forest Products, Region 1, Branch of Research, Forest Service * CONTENTS Page Page Introduction 1 Mechanical and physical properties—Con. The larch-fir mixture 2 Resistance to decay, weathering, and Character and range of the western larch insects 39 forest __ 4 Reaction to preservative treatment 42 Occurrence 4 Heat and insulating properties 42 Character 4 Permeability by liquids 42 Size of stand 7 Tendency to impart odor or ñavor___:. _. 43 Cut and supply 9 Tendency to leach or exude extractives. _ 43 Merchandising practices 10 Chemical properties 43 distribution lO Fire resistance ., 43 Percentage of cut going into various lum- Characteristic defects of western larch 44 ber items 12 Natural defects 44 Descriptive properties of western larch 13 Seasoning defects 46 General description of the wood 13 Manufacturing defects 47 Heartwood content of lumber 13 Grades and their characteristics 47 Growth rings 14 Grade yield and production 48 Summer-wood content 14 Heartwood content 50 Figure. 14 Width of rings 50 How to distinguish western larch from other Grade descriptions .
    [Show full text]
  • Coram Experimental Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Coram Experimental Forest Service Forest: 50 Years of Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Research in a Western Report RMRS-GTR-37 September 1999 Larch Forest Raymond C. Shearer Madelyn M. Kempf Abstract Shearer, Raymond C.; Kempf, Madelyn M. 1999. Coram Experimental Forest: 50 years of research in a western larch forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-37. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 66 p. This publication will enrich public understanding about the important contributions to science made at this and other outdoor laboratories. Coram, and other long-range research sites, provide scientific knowledge to assist resource professionals with the development of sound land management principles. This knowledge ensures healthy, sustainable, and productive ecosystems while meeting social and economic needs. Major research at Coram includes the regeneration of young forests and the interaction of flora, fauna, and water to a wide range of forest treatments. Ongoing studies include: • cone and seed development and dispersal • natural and artificial regeneration after harvest cuttings • effects of stand culture treatment on forest development • insect and disease interactions • effects of the amount of wood harvest on site productivity • influence of silvicultural practices on watershed, esthetics, and wildlife values The Coram Experimental Forest is used cooperatively by Federal, university, and private scientists. About 340 ha of the forest are designated as the Coram Research Natural Area where virgin conditions are permanently maintained for research and monitoring. Coram, designated a Biosphere Reserve in 1976, is part of an international network that is devoted to the conservation of nature and scientific research in the service of humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Larix Decidua Miller Taxonomy Author, Year Miller Synonym Larix Europaea DC; Larix Sudetica Domin; Pinus Larix L
    Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group Tree factsheet images at pages 3 and 4 Larix decidua Miller taxonomy author, year Miller synonym Larix europaea DC; Larix sudetica Domin; Pinus larix L. Family Pinaceae Eng. Name European larch, Common larch Dutch name Europese lariks (Boom, 2000) Europese lork (Heukels’ Flora, 2005) subspecies - varieties L. decidua var. polonica (Racib) Ostenf. & Syrach Larsen (syn. L. polonica Racib.) L. decidua var. carpatica Domin (syn. L. carpatica Domin.) hybrids Larix x marschlinsii Coaz (L. decidua x L. kaempferi) (syn. Larix x eurolepis Henry) cultivars, frequently planted - references Earle, C.J. Gymnosperm database www.conifers.org USDA Forest Service www.pfaf.org/database/index.php Westra, J.J. Het geslacht Larix. In Schmidt (ed.). 1987. Ned. Boomsoorten 1 Syllabus vakgroep Bosteelt en Bosecologie, Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen Plants for a Future Database; www.pfaf.org/index.html morphology crown habit tree, pyramidal max. height (m) Europe: 30-50 The Netherlands: 30 max. dbh (cm) 100-200 oldest tree year 988 AC, tree ring count, Val Malenco, Italy. actual size Europe year …, d(130) 95, h 46, Glenlee Park, Dumfries and Galloway, UK. year …, d(130) 271, h 30, Ulten Valley, Saint Nicholas, Italy. actual size Netherlands year 1844, d…, h …, Schovenhorst, Putten year 1830-1840, d(130) 114, h 17 year 1850-1860, d(130) 115, h 20 year 1860-1870, d(130) 97, h 28 leaf length (cm) 2-4 single leaf petiole (cm) 0 leaf colour upper surface green leaf colour under surface green leaves arrangement alternate flowering March - May flowering plant monoecious flower monosexual flower diameter (cm) ? pollination wind fruit; length cone; 3-4 cm fruit petiole (cm) 0,3 seed; length samara (=winged nut); … cm seed-wing length (cm) weight 1000 seeds (g) 5,0-5,9 seeds ripen October same year seed dispersal wind habitat natural distribution Alps, Central Europe in N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Trees in the Southern Forest Inventory
    United States Department of Big Trees in the Southern Agriculture Forest Inventory Forest Service Southern Christopher M. Oswalt, Sonja N. Oswalt, Research Station and Thomas J. Brandeis Research Note SRS–19 March 2010 Abstract or multiple years. Listings of big trees encountered during the most recent forest inventory activities in the South Big trees fascinate people worldwide, inspiring respect, awe, and oftentimes, even controversy. This paper uses a modified version of are reported in this research note and should supplement American Forests’ Big Trees Measuring Guide point system (May 1990) existing lists and registers. to rank trees sampled between January of 1998 and September of 2007 on over 89,000 plots by the Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, For more than 75 years, the FIA Program has been charged Forest Inventory and Analysis Program in the Southern United States. Trees were ranked across all States and for each State. There were 1,354,965 by Congress to “make and keep current a comprehensive trees from 12 continental States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands inventory and analysis of the present and prospective sampled. A bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) in Arkansas was the biggest conditions of and requirements for the renewable resources tree (according to the point system) recorded in the South, with a diameter of the forest and rangelands of the United States” of 78.5 inches and a height of 93 feet (total points = 339.615). The tallest tree recorded in the South was a 152-foot tall pecan (Carya illinoinensis) in (McSweeney-McNary Act of May 22, 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Management of Larix Forests: a Look Ahead Proceedings of an International Symposium
    Ecology and Management of Larix Forests: A Look Ahead Proceedings of an International Symposium Whitefish, Montana, U.S.A. October 5-9, 1992 Compilers: Wyman C. Schmidt Kathy J. McDonald Duchesne, L. C.; Lelu, M. A; von Aderkas, P.; Charest, Klimaszewska, K 1989. Plantlet development from imma­ P. J. 1992. Microprojectile-mediated DNA delivery in ture zygotic embryos of hybrid larch through somatic haploid and diploid embryogenic cells of Larix spp. embryogenesis. Plant Science. 63: 95-103. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. [In press]. Klimaszewska, K; Ward, C.; Cheliak, W. M. 1992. Cryo­ Ellis, D. D.; McCabe, D.; McInnis, S.; Martinell, B.; preservation and plant regeneration from embryogenic Roberts, D.; McCown, B. 1991. Transformation of white cultures oflarch (Larix x eurolepis) and black spruce spruce by electrical discharge particle acceleration. In: (Picea mariana). Journal of Expermental Botany. 43: Haissing, B. E.; Kirk, T. K; Olsen, W. L.; Raffa, K F.; 73-79. Slavicek, J. M., eds. Applications of biotechnology-to Lelu, M. A; Klimaszewska, K K; Jones, C.; Ward, C.; tree culture, protection and utilization. United States von Aderkas, P.; Charest, P. J. 1992. A laboratory guide Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Columbus, to somatic embryogenesis in spruce and larch. Petawawa OH:I02. National Forestry Institute. Information Report. Huang, Y.; Diner, AM.; Karnosky, D. F. 1991. Agrobacter­ PI-X-Ul (submitted for publication). ium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformation and von Aderkas, P.; Klimaszewska, K K; Bonga, J . M. 1990. regeneration of a conifer: oorix decidua. In: Vitro Cell. Diploid and haploid embryogenesis in Larix leptolepis, Dev. BioI. 27P: 201-207.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Chloroplast Genome of Japanese Larch (Larix Kaempferi): Insights Into Intraspecific Variation with an Isolated Northern Limit Population
    Article Complete Chloroplast Genome of Japanese Larch (Larix kaempferi): Insights into Intraspecific Variation with an Isolated Northern Limit Population Shufen Chen 1, Wataru Ishizuka 2, Toshihiko Hara 3 and Susumu Goto 1,* 1 Education and Research Center, The University of Tokyo Forests, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan; [email protected] 2 Forestry Research Institute, Hokkaido Research Organization, Koushunai, Bibai, Hokkaido 079-0166, Japan; [email protected] 3 Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo-city, Hokkaido 060-0819, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-3-5841-5493 Received: 25 July 2020; Accepted: 11 August 2020; Published: 14 August 2020 Abstract: Research Highlights: The complete chloroplast genome for eight individuals of Japanese larch, including from the isolated population at the northern limit of the range (Manokami larch), revealed that Japanese larch forms a monophyletic group, within which Manokami larch can be phylogenetically placed in Japanese larch. We detected intraspecific variation for possible candidate cpDNA markers in Japanese larch. Background and Objectives: The natural distribution of Japanese larch is limited to the mountainous range in the central part of Honshu Island, Japan, with an isolated northern limit population (Manokami larch). In this study, we determined the phylogenetic position of Manokami larch within Japanese larch, characterized the chloroplast genome of Japanese larch, detected intraspecific variation, and determined candidate cpDNA markers. Materials and Methods: The complete genome sequence was determined for eight individuals, including Manokami larch, in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglasfirdouglasfirfacts About
    DouglasFirDouglasFirfacts about Douglas Fir, a distinctive North American tree growing in all states from the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific Ocean, is probably used for more Beams and Stringers as well as Posts and Timber grades include lumber and lumber product purposes than any other individual species Select Structural, Construction, Standard and Utility. Light Framing grown on the American Continent. lumber is divided into Select Structural, Construction, Standard, The total Douglas Fir sawtimber stand in the Western Woods Region is Utility, Economy, 1500f Industrial, and 1200f Industrial grades, estimated at 609 billion board feet. Douglas Fir lumber is used for all giving the user a broad selection from which to choose. purposes to which lumber is normally put - for residential building, light Factory lumber is graded according to the rules for all species, and and heavy construction, woodwork, boxes and crates, industrial usage, separated into Factory Select, No. 1 Shop, No. 2 Shop and No. 3 poles, ties and in the manufacture of specialty products. It is one of the Shop in 5/4 and thicker and into Inch Factory Select and No. 1 and volume woods of the Western Woods Region. No. 2 Shop in 4/4. Distribution Botanical Classification In the Western Douglas Fir is manufactured by a large number of Western Woods Douglas Fir was discovered and classified by botanist David Douglas in Woods Region, Region sawmills and is widely distributed throughout the United 1826. Botanically, it is not a true fir but a species distinct in itself known Douglas Fir trees States and foreign countries. Obtainable in straight car lots, it can as Pseudotsuga taxifolia.
    [Show full text]