Page 1 of 23
KAPUSKASING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MEETING TO BE HELD ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2016 AT 12:00 PM
Page
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
3. DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3 - 5 a) KEDC Board minutes of meeting held on June 20, 2016
5. BUSINESS ARISING
6. FINANCIALS 7 a) Income statement to October 31, 2016 and year-end forecast
7. REPORTS AND PROJECT UPDATES 9 - 12 a) Economic Development Officer Project & Activity Report
8. NEW BUSINESS 13 - 14 a) Kapuskasing Economic Revitalization Initiative
b) NOHFC Agreement Multi-Use Hangar (By-Law No.7)
9. INFORMATION ITEMS 15 - 16 a) RAIN Cross-seeding research project
17 b) Sustainable New Agri-food Products & Productivity Program
19 - 21 c) Canada Gazette - Regulations Amending the Health of Animals Regulations
23 d) Kap River - Parking Lot Expansion (Proposed)
10. ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION
11. ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 23 Page 3 of 23
Kapuskasing Economic Development Corporation Minutes of the Board Meeting held on
Monday, June 20*“,2016 l2(noon) — Library Board Room
Present: Mayor Alan Spacek, President Linda Semczyszyn, Vice—President Councillor Martin Dinnissen, Treasurer Yves Labelle, Secretary Councillor Laurier Guillemette Ron Isaac René Labelle Cindy Reasbeck
-and-
Andre Robichaud, EDO Bill Greenaway, MNR
Regrets: André Ouimette Mark Stanley Michel Lamontagne, MNDM Joe Petruska Gilles Theberge
Meeting Called to Order Mayor Spacek called the meeting to order at 12:00PM
1.0 Approval of Agenda
Additions: 7.2 Appoint KDC C Resource Person to KEDC 8.4 CanadianCannabisBusiness ConferenceReport
Movedby: C. Reasbeck Secondedby: L. Guillemette Res. #2016-038 That the agenda be approved as amended CARRIED
2.0 Declaration of Pecuniary Interest
Yves Labelle, Discussion surrounding the farm.
3.0 Adoption of the minutes of meetings held on April 25"‘,2016
Movedby: L. Semczyszyn Secondedby: L. Guillemette as Res. #2016-039 That the minutes of the meeting of April 25, 2016 be approved presented CARRIED Page 4 of 23
.2-
Kapuskasing Economic Development CorporationMeeting of June 20, 2016 (CONT’D)
4.0 Business Arising from Minutes
Letter from Jody Blais was referredto the executive committee. The request to receive $0.25 / L discountwas reviewedat the May 30"‘executive committee meeting. The request was denied.
5.0 Financials 5.1 Income statement to May 31, 2016
Highlights: Revenue = $321676 Expenses = 5175.878
Moved by: L. Semczyszyn Seconded by: C. Reasbeck Res. #2016-040 That the income statement to May 31, 2016 be approved as presented._
5.2 2015 Auditor’s Report and Financial Statements
Highlights: Revenue = 450,985 Expenses = $521,038
Moved by: R. Isaac Seconded by: L. Semczyszyn Res. #2016-041 That the 2015 Auditor’s Report and Financial Statements be approved as presented. QARREMD
6.0 Reports / Project Updates
6.1 EDO - A. Robichaud:
Report distributed to all members.
Moved by: R. Labelle Seconded by: L. Guillemette Res. #2016-042 Thatthe EDO’s project report be approved as presented. .C£R1E;._12
7.0 New Business
7.1 Regional Agriculture Value Proposition
A proposed project description, budget, project timelines and proposed study area was distributed to the board. It was suggested that the KEDC contact Beef Farmers of Ontario (BFO) to participate in the project. Furthermore, the project should also stay in close communication with Tembec (Re: Reforestation)
Moved by: R. lsaac Seconded by: M. Dinnissen Res. #2016-043 That the EDO proceed with the project and to solicit partners and explore all funding avenues to support the project. CARRIED Page 5 of 23
.3.
KapuskasingEconomic Development Corporation Meetingof June 20, 2016 (CONT’D)
7.2 KDCC Resource Person to KEDC
Moved by: R. Isaac Seconded by: L. Semczyszyn Res. #2016-O44 That the KEDC board of directors approve the Helen Aguiar as the resource person of the KDCC.
8.0 Information Items
The following was distributed to the members as information items;
8.1 Enterprise Olympics / Les Olympiques de l‘entreprise 8.2 New Municipal Website 8.3 Cooperative agricole (Information Session) 8.4 Canadian Cannabis Business Conference Report
9.0 Roundtable Discussion
B. Greenway Informed the group that IVINRhas a land information system (Land Information Ontario) that could possibly assist the Agriculture Value Proposition project.
C. Reasbeck: Mentioned that she has staff in Moose Factory and through NADF to assist in promotingthe 2016 Youth Gathering.
10.0 Adjournment Moved by: L. Guillemette Seconded by: L. Semczyszyn Res. #2016-045 That the KEDC Board Meeting of April 25, 2016 be adjourned at 1:00 P.M.
Date: [)€[Mv\\)41'Wm
Alan Sp cek, President Page 6 of 23 Page 7 of 23
KAPUSKASING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION October 31, 2016
2016 Budget 2016 Actual 2016 Forecast REVENUES TOWN OF KAPUSKASING $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 YOUTH GATHERING 30,000 $ 14,000 $ 14,000 ABORIGINAL FIRST NATION - $ - $ - SKS LOAN INTEREST 24,000 $ - $ 24,000 FEDNOR YOUTH INTERN 31,500 $ 24,408 $ 31,500 EXPERIMENTAL FARM 137,000 $ 103,819 $ 139,085 HANGAR RENTAL 30,000 $ 24,731 $ 30,000 INVESTMENT READINESS 7,500 $ - $ 7,500 WEEPING TILE FEASIBILITY STUDY 18,000 $ - $ - ECONOMIC FORUM 3,000 $ 6,725 $ 6,725 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 3,000 $ 1,771 $ 8,600
TOTAL REVENUES $ 534,000 $ 425,454 $ 511,410
EXPENDITURES ADMINISTRATION $ 140,480 $ 118,931 $ 144,250 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 22,000 8,379 22,200 NORTHEAST COMMUNITY NETWORK 500 500 500 YOUTH INTERN 39,500 30,130 39,500 MARKETING 7,500 8,228 10,250 OTHER PROJECTS 4,229 8,794 9,400 MINING SUPPLY & SERVICE (TEDC) 1,700 - 1,700 PDAC NORTHERN SHOWCASE 1,000 1,000 1,000 PLACE AUX JEUNES 500 - - WEEPING TILE MANUFACTURING 20,000 - - PROJET HORS SENTIER 2,000 - 600 INVESTMENT READINESS 10,000 - 10,000 ABORIGINAL FIRST NATION 51,670 25,900 25,900 AIRPORT HANGAR 27,621 28,348 30,483 AIRPORT PRODUCTION FACILITY 5,000 - - MULTI-USE HANGAR 5,000 - - YOUTH GATHERING 30,000 13,147 14,760 EXPERIMENTAL FARM 165,300 124,383 196,100
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 534,000 $ 367,740 $ 506,643
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) $ - $ 57,714 $ 4,767
Notes Schedule of revenues and expenses attached Page 8 of 23 Page 9 of 23
Economic Development Monthly Report
To: KEDC Board of Directors From: André Robichaud, Economic Development Officer Date: December 6, 2016
Agriculture
The Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) as part of the Ontario Agriculture and Aquaculture and Food Processing sector strategy development, is exploring a proposed pilot project to expand livestock production in Northern Ontario. The Northern Livestock Pilot team will be in Kapuskasing on December 13th to meet with area economic development officials. The goal of the meeting is raise awareness about the pilot, continue the discussion initiated with municipalities and to explore possibilities for municipalities to advance their economic development strategies.
The Agriculture Investment Readiness Study was submitted to the Northern Communities Investment Readiness (NCIR) program in November. The project will look at assembling large agricultural block in the Opasatika to Fauquier-Strickland corridor. The project is in line with the Northern Livestock Pilot project. Total project budget = $32,500 KEDC contribution = $5,200
FedNor recently approved the Farm project. I am currently working with NOHFC to approve certain components of the project. More information on the project can be found below. Some of the work is already underway such as the installation of a switch in the office building, cleaning up old internet wires, running jacks, installing omni antennas and now most buildings having wireless capabilities. The majority of the work will take place in 2017.
Eligible Ineligible Project Cost Category Total NOHFC FedNor KEDC Costs Costs (approved) Purchase of land $ - $ 258,000 $258,000 $ - $ - $ 258,000 Purchase of building $ 95,760 $ 246,240 $342,000 $ 47,880 $ - $ 47,880 Tile Drainage (40 acres) $ 38,668 $ - $38,668 $ 19,334 $ - $ 19,334 Fencing (33,000 LF @ $ 98,350 $ - $98,350 $ - $ 39,336 $ 59,014 Elevator$2.98) Installation $ 305,279 $ - $305,279 $ 152,640 $ 120,000 $ 32,640 Grain Bins $ 116,500 $ - $116,500 $ - $ 45,781 $ 70,719 ICT Equipment $ 103,300 $ - $103,300 $ 51,650 $ 40,606 $ 11,044 Barn Curtains, Ventilation $ 119,050 $ - $119,050 $ - $ 46,800 $ 72,250 Apiculture Demonstration $ 10,333 $ - $10,333 $ 5,166 $ 4,062 $ 1,104 Site TOTAL $887,240 $504,240 $1,391,480 $ 276,670 $ 296,585 $ 818,225
I recently prepared communication materials for the administration building at the Farm. We took two (2) ads in the Northern Times, one (1) in Northern Ontario Business and advertised through Facebook. We have received three (3) requests for information.
In collaboration with the Rural Agri Innovation Network (RAIN), I have identified plots and a technician to undertake cross-seeding forage trials at the Demonstration Farm. The project will take place in 2017. Kapuskasing is part of a larger study that includes the Thunder Bay and New Liskeard Ag Research Stations and the RAIN. The project will also include demonstration visits.
In collaboration with the Northeast Community Network (NeCN), I am helping to organize the “Growing the North” Ag Symposium that will take place in Kapuskasing on March 30-31, 2017. It is expected that more than 150 participants will take in the symposium.
Page 10 of 23
I remain in contact with Collège Boréal, Beef Farmers of Ontario and OMAFRA as it relates to identifying for us in Kapuskasing.
I am also involved in the Great Clay Belt Agriculture Workforce Development Study. Val-Rita is the lead proponent of the project.
Airport Business Park
CannAssist Canada has not received any new news or updates from Health Canada as it relates to their application to become a licensed medical marijuana producer. It is worth noting that out of the 30+ applications granted by Health Canada, only nine (9) were handed out in 2016. Health Canada is currently awaiting a report from the Task Force on Marijuana Legalization and Regulation, and it’s suspected that this may be holding back new licensed producers. In the interim, CannAssist is investigating a contingency plan that would allow them to move forward on the project by growing high value indoor crops.
The multi-use hangar project has received conditional approval by one level of senior government. I am working with the other as they go through their due diligence.
Project Category Eligible Costs Ineligible Costs Total Costs KEDC NOHFC FEDNOR Building & Construction 2,840,460 479,040 3,388,500
Engineering 215,000 27,150 242,150
Equipment 114,000 15,000 129,000
Purchase of Land - 38,363 38,363
Total 3,169,460 559,553 3,798,013 1,798,013 1,000,000 1,000,000
Youth Gathering
The 4th Annual “Growing Together” Youth Gathering was a success. 173 students participated over the two days. Three (3) local high schools, KDHS, Écho du Nord and Kap-Kash High School, participated. Students from Constance Lake, Taykwa Tagamou Nation and Timmins also participated.
Planning for 2017 has already begun. The event will take place November 20-21. I met with national speaker Stan Wesley while at the CAMA conference. He accepted the invitation to be our event MC. I am awaiting a service proposal.
Page 11 of 23
Assistance to access funding
The KEDC provides assistance to organizations who want to hire summer students, interns or who are seeking help with funding applications.
2016 Kap Golf Club – METS Intern FedNor Intern (Gordanier Farm) Intern Kap Golf Club - Summer Experience Summer Student Kapuskasing Meats (EFP - Marketing) Marketing Kap Golf Club - Canada Summer Jobs Summer Student (2) Les Boys Sport (BEAM) Website Kap Golf Club - Healthy Kids Misc. Agricultural Industrial Park (FedNor) Capital Multi-Use Hangar Capital Total YTD $ 1,372,386 Total Since 2009 $ 3,604,364
Sports Tourism
Sports Tourism provides significant economic benefits. Based on the experience trying to secure the Midget “AAA” provincial championship, I suggested to the board that we should encourage any organization to host an event and/or help out any organization that is successful in securing such an event. The Kapuskasing Peewee Icehawks have secured the 2017 Ontario Hockey Federation Championship (April 6-9). Cité des Jeunes has secured the 2017 Franco-Filles provincial hockey tournament (April 3-5). Both events are expected to generate in excess of $150,000 in direct spending in the community. I am currently working with both committees to maximize sponsorship through win-win opportunities (i.e. hotels, restaurants, etc.).
Regional Projects
Aventure Nord (PowerSports)
This francophone project is a collaboration between the communities of Kapuskasing, Hearst, SRF, Cochrane & Dubreuilville. It seeks to promote francophone partner communities to snowmobile, ATV and motorcycle enthusiasts in the province of Quebec. More and more motor sport enthusiasts are looking for experiences other than conventional riding. Back country riding is increasing in popularity across our region. This brings challenges to our region and we are at risk of losing visitors. Phase 1 of the project was completed earlier this year. Visit www.aventurenord.ca to plan your next adventure!
World’s Best Snowmobile Destination
This project is being led by the NeCN. A summit was held in Cochrane on November 3-4. A five (5) year action was prepared and will be presented to the NeCN on Janaury 10th, 2017. Visit www.snowmobilenorth.com/ to learn more.
Northern Ontario Mining Showcase
We are a partner of the Northern Ontario Mining Showcase Committee. Since 2013, Kapuskasing has been at the planning table. The event has grown from a one-day / 5 business event at PDAC to a multi- day / 70+ business delegation event. The event is a collaboration between the communities of Kapuskasing, Hearst, Cochrane, Temiskaming Shores and funding partners. The 2017 Northern Ontario Mining Showcase will take place from March 5-8. Page 12 of 23
NeCN Mining Committee
The mining committee is working with the Ontario Geological Survey to raise awareness of the recent aerial survey data maps (Hearst to Cochrane) that were released. Package 1 (East of Kap to Cochrane) was release in April and more that 1,000 anomalies were identified. It is expected that approximately that 40-50 will warrant further investigation. We are hoping that they will be included in the 2016-17 Recommendations for Exploration by the OGS. Package 2 (West of Kapuskasing to Hearst) has yet to be released.
Mining Supply, Trade & Investment Project
This three (3) year project is an initiative of the Timmins EDC. The project is nearly complete. The following activities were completed, but not limited to; mining supply gap analysis, marketing materials developed, value propositions developed for each community (Kapuskasing), target list developed, web presence (Ontario’s Golden North). Other
Conseil de la coopération de l’Ontario (CCO)
Le CCO is hosting a forum in Kapuskasing on February 16, 2017. The forum will take place in the Civic Centre auditorium. The group is seeking community support. I have suggested that the KEDC can be a partner and will cover the cost of the auditorium. Information on the forum will be circulated to board members once it becomes available.
Meetings
Nov 1 Temiskaming Shores Nov 18 Meeting F. Siebert Nov 3-4 James Gray (Mall) Nov 21 Meeting with CAO Nov 9 Ag Workforce Study Nov 23 KDHS Pow Wow Call with OGS Nov 25 CCO Dènik Dorval CIP Meeting Nov 28 Farm Office Visit Nov 10 OHF Peewee Meeting Nov 29 Call with Timmins EDC Nov 15 Hangar Project Meeting Dec 05 OHF Peewee Meeting Nov 16 Call with Grayson Bass Dec 06 Lee Anderson (Localtel) Nov 17 Call with Festival Hydro Dec 07 NeCN Board of Directors Farm Visit – Energy Audit Mining Trade & Investment Nov 18 Call with Dave Stewart
Events/Conferences
Nov 3-4 Snowmobile Summit Nov 6-8 Canadian Aboriginal Mineral Association Conference Nov 3-4 World’s Best Snowmobile Destination Summit
Page 13 of 23
Report
To: KEDC Board of Directors From: André Robichaud, Economic Development Officer Date: December 12, 2016
This report has been prepared to suggest an approach to move forward with a strategic community initiative.
As part of the 2016-2020 Community Strategic Plan, one of the key directions identified is “Beautiful Kapuskasing”. Within this direction, Revitalized Buildings was a theme identified along with a strategic activity.
Residents expressed an interest in improving the appearance of the community and giving it a “facelift” over the next few years. They cited the loss of heritage buildings and the poor appearance of aging buildings as a weaknesses in the town. Developing a Community Improvement Plan that is tied to an overall economic revitalization initiative would address many of the concerns around community appearance and also help attract investment and further retain and expand businesses in the downtown core.
It is recommended that the KEDC take the lead on this strategic initiative based on securing funding from both levels of senior government.
Suggested Approach & Timelines
December 20 / 16 Submit phase 1 funding applications to senior governments January 11 / 17 Release RFP January 25 / 17 RFP Closing Date February 20 /17 Submit phase 2 funding applications to senior governments April / 2017 Project Initiation
1/2
Page 14 of 23
Financial Implications
Project Budget: $90,000 + travel expenses
Possible funding: $9,000 (90%)
Attachments
2016-2020 Community Strategic Plan (page 19-20)
2/2 Page 15 of 23
Farmers wanted: Participate in RAlN’scross-seeding research project
By Christine0’Rei/ly, RAINResearch Technician
The RuralAgri-Innovation Network (RAIN)will be leading a research project in 2017 to investigate whether cross-seeding forages is an economically viable practice for northern Ontario. RAINis partnering with researchers from the ThunderBay Agricultural Research Station, the EmoAgricultural Research Station, and the Kapuskasing Demonstration Farm to expand the reach of this project across the north.
Cross-seeding (also called cross-drilling) is a technique for establishing a crop where halfthe seed is planted in a conventional drive pattern using a seed drill.The other half of the seed is drilled at a 45 degree angle to the original pass in order to achieve better ground coverage. Better coverage can help reduce soil erosion and assist sown forage crops out-compete weeds, resulting in better quality and higher yielding forage. Thistechnique may have a place in northern livestock systems where forages are established as long-term stands, and purchasing an implement designed speci?cally for forages does not make economic sense. While grain drills are often readily available, the row spacing is generally wider than recommended for establishing perennial forages. Cross«seeding changes the spatial distribution of a crop and may overcome these shortfalls.
Conventional seedi :
5.-aton comparing drive pattern and seeding rate for conventional and cross-seeding methods. Note that line Jcates seeding rate on each pass
Cross—seeding does not use any more seed than conventional seeding methods; the difference is that planting requires two passes of machinery. The United Kingdom's Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board report that up to 80 per cent of soil compaction caused by machinery occursduring the ?rst pass. Compaction riskshould not be signi?cantlyincreased by cross-seeding. The largest disadvantage to cross-seeding is the increased costs of fuel, machinery, and labour to sowthe crop. Page 16 of 23
This research project aims to determine whether the yield and quality advantages of cross-seeding are large enough to overcome the increased establishment costs involved.
We are lookingfor farmer cooperators to assist with this project. if you willbe establishing a new hay field or pasture with a seed drill in 2017 and would liketo be involved, please contact the partner researcher in your district for more information.
District Researcher Telephone Email Algoma/Manitoulin Christine O‘Reilly 705 942 7927 X3147 [email protected] Cochrane Laurier Guillemette 705 335 5021 Laurier.Guillemette@kapusl This project wasfunded in part through Growing Forward 2 (GF2),a federaI-provincial-territorial initiative. The Agricultural Adaptation Council assists in the delivery of GF2 in Ontario. Page 17 of 23 SUSTAINABLE NEW AGRI-FOOD PRODUCTS & PRODUCTIVITY Funding for Northern Ontario agriculture producers, food processors, businesses, communities, First Nations, and collaborations. Up to $5,000 at 75% cost-share toward the purchase of equipment or materials that will result in: • the creation of a food or agriculture product new to the business; • season extension of products or crops; • scaling up production or enhancing productivity. Collaborations can be eligible for up to $15,000 at 75% cost-share. PROJECT STREAMS Season New Productivity Extension Product(s) Enhancement EXAMPLES OF ELIGIBLE COSTS Food or bre processing equipment Food packaging equipment Greenhouses or high tunnels for season extension Cold storage equipment Materials for on-farm storage Production equipment Visit www.rainalgoma.ca/SNAPP or contact the Rural Agri-Innovation Network for details (705-942-7927 x3135) Funding provided by FedNor, Industry Canada Page 18 of 23 Page 19 of 23 08/12/2Gi6 CanadaGazetie—RegulaiionsAmendingtheHealihofAnimalsRegulations In ii'e:'.':2:“'9.°t.°.*:r.:- Canad'2’ Canada Gazette H0l'T'|€ 1' > P lrC [Ion > Vol, 150 2016 > December3, 2016 > RegulationsAmendingthe Health of Animals Regulations Vol. 150. No. 49 — December 3. 2016 Regulations Amending the Health of Animals Regulations Statutory authority Health of Animals Act Sponsoring agency Canadian Food Inspection Agency REGULATORYIMPACT ANALYSISSTATEMENT (This statement is not part of the Regulations.) Executive summary Issues: The current provisions of the Health ofAnimals Regulations (HAR or the Regulations) dealing with the transportation of animals do not reflect current science regarding the care and handling of animals, do not align with the standards of Canada's international trading partners, and are not aligned with the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) welfare standards for animals transported by land, air, and sea. This leads to a continuing risk that animals will suffer during transportation. Description: The HAR would be amended to - Provide clarification by adding definitions (for example definitions for compromised and unfit animals) and establishing clear requirements for regulated parties to better understand what is expected of them; - improve animal welfare and reduce risk of suffering during transportation by establishing clear and science- lnformed requirements that better reflect animals’ needs and current industry practices; - Better align with the standards of Canada’s international trading partners and the OIE animal welfare standards for animals transported by land, air, and sea; and - Remove obsolete or unnecessary requirements to reduce the burden on the industry. Cost-benefit statement: It is anticipated that a small portion of commercial camersthat transport animals by land would bear additional costs, as an estimated 98% of all shipments are already in compliance with the proposed amendments. Some processors in the poultry industry may experience incremental costs associated with changes in management practices, but will realize cost savings in relation to the benefits resulting from these changes. The present value of the total industry costs is estimated to be approximately $3.9 million. In addition to improving animal welfare, the proposed amendments would reduce transport losses and improve marketability and product quality, leading to benefits for consumers, “One-for-One" Rule and small business lens: The “One-for-One” Rule would apply to the proposed amendments. The total administrative cost increase is estimated to have an annualized value of approximately $320,000. The small business lens would also apply. The total cost savings of the flexible option for small business is estimated to have an annualized value of approximately $67,000. Domestic and international coordination and co-operation: Protecting animal welfare in Canada is a shared responsibility between federal, provincial and territorial governments, producers, transporters, processors, retailers, and many other stakeholders. The proposed amendments to the HAR would significantly improve alignment with the OIE animal welfare standards for animals transported by land, air and sea. Furthennore, based on a comparative review conducted by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), the proposals respecting feed, water and rest would align Canada's regulatory outcomes more closely with those of its trading partners, such as New Zealand, Australia, the United States, and the European Union (EU). Background Animals are valued by people for social, cultural, economic and emotional reasons. They provide food, fibre, and companionship; are used in sport, recreation, education, and scientific study; and have increasing importance as aesthetic assets in their own right. httpzl/www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-prlpl/2016l2016-12-03lhtrnI/reg2-eflg-phP#f89 1/26 Page 20 of 23 Feed, Water and Rest 159 No person shall confine, load or transport an animal, or cause one to be confined, loaded or transported, unless the person determines when it was last fed, watered and rested. 159.1 (1) No person shall con?ne or transport an animal, or cause one to be confined or transported, in a conveyance or container unless the animal - (a) is provided with c (i) safe water in amounts and at intervals that are sufficient to prevent the animal from becoming dehydrated, and 3 (ii) feed of an appropriate type for the species and in amounts and at intervals that are sufficient to prevent nutritional metabolic abnormality; and - (b) is rested in accordance with the animal's needs and at intervals that are sufficient to prevent the animal from suffering due to fatigue. (2) The intervals without feed, safe water and rest shall not exceed the following: o (a) 12 hours for ruminants that are too young to be fed exclusively on hay and grain, for any compromised animal and for livestock, a camelid or a cervid of eight days of age or less; 0 (b) 24 hours for broiler chickens, spent laying hens and rabbits; - (c) 28 hours for equine and porcine; - (cl) 72 hours from the time of hatching for birds; and o (e) 36 hours for any other animal. (3) In the event that more than one of the periods in subsection (2) applies, the shortest interval governs. (4) For the purposes of this section, an interval ends and the next interval begins, - (a) in the case of water, when the animal has taken sufficient safe water to prevent dehydration; o (b) in the case of feed, when the animal has taken sufficient feed to prevent nutritional metabolic abnormalities; and c (c) in the case of rest, when the animal has rested for at least eight hours. 159.2 (1) Every person feeding, watering and resting animals shall, at that time, provide 0 (a) sufficient space to allow the animals to lie down without lying on top of each other; e (b) equipment designed for feeding and watering the animals; I (c) well-drained and clean floors that provide a secure surface to prevent the animals from tripping, slipping, falling or sustaining an injury; o (d) sufficient straw or other bedding to protect the animals from suffering or injury; 0 (e) sufficient straw or other bedding to keep the animals clean and dry; - (f) protection from meteorological or environmental conditions or humidity in order to prevent suffering, injury or death; and o (g) adequate ventilation to prevent suffering, injury or death. (2) Animals being transported in a conveyance on land may be fed, watered and rested in the conveyance If it is stopped and the requirements of subsection (1) are met. (3) Every sea carrier shall, before departure, have on the vessel Page 21 of 23 o (a) a sufficient amount of feed and safe water for each animal to be transported, having regard to the expected duration of the transport, to prevent each animal from suffering, dehydration, nutritional metabolic abnormality and death; and o (b) an additional one-day supply of feed and safe water for every period of four days or less of the expected duration of the transport. (4) The sea carrier shall 0 (a) have storage on the vessel for the feed and safe water in a place and in a manner that will prevent them from posing a risk to the animal's health and from otherwise becoming unsuitable for animal consumption; and o (b) have dispensing systems for the feed and safe water on the vessel. Proposed maximum intervals Species and class Proposed Current (hours) (hours) I compromised animals 12 N/A Ruminants that are too 12 18 young to be fed exclusively on hay and grain Broiler chickens, spent 24 36 laying hens and rabbits 5' Beef and dairy cattle and 36 52 V, other adult ruminants /' that can be fed 4 exclusively on hay and grain Other adult monogastrics 36 36 Equines and pigs 28 36 Day—oldbirds 72 (lrun?atuol 72 hl?h?il Page 22 of 23 Page 23 of 23 PROPOSED KAP RIVERPARKINGLOT EXPANSION Imagery @201 6 Dignalelobe, Map data @201 6 Google 50 ft I EXISTINGPARKINGLOT 175’ WX 180 H PARKINGLOT EXPANSION PHASE 1 ‘I15’ W X 246’ H PARKINGLOT EXPANSION PHASE 2 250’ W X 250 ’ H