Smooth Rock Falls Forest Independent Forest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Smooth Rock Falls Forest Independent Forest Smooth Rock Falls Forest – Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................iii 2.0 Table of Recommendations and Best Practices ............................................................... 1 3.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Audit Process ...................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Management Unit Description ............................................................................................... 3 3.3 Current Issues ..................................................................................................................... 3 3.4 Summary of Consultation and Input to Audit .......................................................................... 4 4.0 Audit Findings .................................................................................................................. 4 4.1 Commitment ....................................................................................................................... 4 4.2 Public Consultation and Aboriginal Involvement ...................................................................... 4 4.3 Forest Management Planning ................................................................................................ 6 4.4 Plan Assessment and Implementation ................................................................................. 11 4.5 System Support ................................................................................................................. 18 4.6 Monitoring ........................................................................................................................ 18 4.7 Achievement of Management Objectives and Sustainability ................................................... 22 Trend Analysis Report ..................................................................................................... 22 Achievement of Management Objectives .......................................................................... 23 Forest Sustainability ....................................................................................................... 23 4.8 Contractual Obligations ...................................................................................................... 23 4.9 Conclusions and Licence Extension Recommendation ............................................................ 24 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 24 Appendix 2 – Management Objectives Tables ................................................................................... 58 Appendix 3 – Compliance with Contractual Obligations ..................................................................... 61 Appendix 4 – Audit Process ............................................................................................................. 63 Appendix 5 – List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................ 68 Appendix 6 – Audit Team Members and Qualifications ....................................................................... 69 Appendix 7 – Comparison and Trend Analysis Report ........................................................................ 72 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Forest management plans within audit scope. ........................................................................ 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the SRFF in relation to Northeastern Ontario and surrounding Forest Management Units and communities as well as the amalgamated Abitibi River Forest ............. 2 Figure 2. (Left) Proportion of forest cover by working group. (Right) Age class distribution .................... 3 Figure 3. Planned vs. actual silviculture program ............................................................................... 14 ii Smooth Rock Falls Forest – Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, for the Smooth Rock Falls Forest (SRFF or ‘the Forest’), documents the results of an Independent Forest Audit conducted by KBM Forestry Consultants Inc. All Crown forests in Ontario are required to be audited at least every five years; the requirement for independent audits arising from MNR's Class Environmental Assessment Approval for Forest Management on Crown Lands in Ontario (2003). Regulation 160/04 of the Crown Forest Sustainability Act (S.O. 1994, c. 25) (CFSA) sets out the specific requirements for conducting the audits. KBM Forestry Consultants Inc. conducted an independent forest audit on the SRFF for the five-year period April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2010. The audit assessed implementation and selected aspects of planning of the final five years of the 2005-10 FMP and planning for the 2010-20 FMP which was not finalized and instead became the 2010-12 Contingency Plan for the amalgamated Cochrane Area Forest (subsequently the Abitibi River Forest). The on-site component of the audit occurred from September 13 to 27, 2010. Document review and interviews occurred throughout the audit process. During the audit term the Forest was managed under an SFL held by Tembec Inc. The principal auditees were the Tembec and the MNR Cochrane District. Based on the audit, 25 recommendations were made. Recommendations arise from audit team observations of material non-conformances, or may be developed to address situations in which the audit team identifies a significant lack of effectiveness in forest management activities. All audit recommendations are directed at either MNR or Abitibi River Forest Management Inc., a cooperative SFL holder who assumed management responsibilities on the Abitibi River Forest effective April 1, 2010. The majority of recommendations centred on deficiencies in the area of forest management planning. However, the key recommendations, discussed below, arose from audit team observations made in the field. A best practice was identified for the ongoing multi-partner woodland caribou research project that is providing valuable information to inform forest management planning and another for the comprehensive monitoring of silvicultural effectiveness and compliance by MNR. Of the 25 audit recommendations there are three areas of concern that are considered key since they highlight the need to significantly alter certain current practices on the Forest in the interest of sustainability. The first area of concern arises from the lack of clear direction from the Province that has allowed forest operations to leave significant amounts of waste wood fibre (slash) at roadside where it occupies productive forest land and prevents establishment of regeneration. This practice is not unique to the SRFF or the amalgamated Abitibi River Forest; management of waste wood (both slash and chipper debris) has been a recurring issue for years as evidenced by the many recommendations made in previous IFAs across Ontario. Only a change at the Provincial policy level, supported by forest management plan commitments and enforcement of such commitments through the Provincial compliance program is likely to lead to an effective, permanent solution. The second area of concern is associated with implementation of harvesting patterns that protect existing regeneration on upland sites. In the audit team’s view this practice will lead to degrading of future stand composition through retention of less desirable species that will form a higher component of the new stand, and reduced productivity due to the inherently higher levels of competition on upland sites, resulting in lower stocking levels. A third related area of concern is the retention of mature larch seed trees in harvest blocks which is also contributing to a significant increase in the larch component on lowland sites. The audit team concluded that management of the Smooth Rock Falls Forest was generally in compliance with the legislation, regulations and policies that were in effect during the audit term and the Forest was managed in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Sustainable Forest Licence held by Tembec Inc. Forest sustainability is being achieved, as assessed through the Independent Forest Audit Process and Protocol. iii KBM Forestry Consultants Inc. Smooth Rock Falls Forest – Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report No recommendation is made on licence extension since a new licence with a twenty year term was issued to Abitibi River Forest Management Inc. for the Abitibi River Forest in August 2010. A recommendation on licence extension will occur at the next IFA. Rod Seabrook, EP(EMSLA) Lead Auditor, on behalf of the audit team iv KBM Forestry Consultants Inc. Smooth Rock Falls Forest – Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report 1.0 TABLE OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES Recommendation on Licence Extension The audit team concludes that management of the Smooth Rock Falls Forest was generally in compliance with the legislation, regulations and policies that were in effect during the term covered by the audit, and the Forest was managed in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Sustainable Forest Licence held by Tembec Inc. Forest sustainability is being achieved, as assessed through the Independent
Recommended publications
  • Kap Community Final Version
    COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2016-2020 Photo by User: P199 at Wikimedia Commons Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... 5! 1.0 Introduction and Background .................................................................................................... 6! 1.1 Developing the Community Vision and Mission Statements ................................................. 6! 1.2 Vision Statement ..................................................................................................................... 6! 1.3 Mission Statement .................................................................................................................. 6! 2.0 Communications and Consultation ............................................................................................ 7! 2.1 Steering Committee ................................................................................................................ 8! 2.2 On-line Survey ........................................................................................................................ 8! 2.3 Focus Groups .......................................................................................................................... 9! 2.4 Interviews ............................................................................................................................... 9! 2.5 Public Consultation ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ®V ®V ®V ®V ®V
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 82°0'W 81°30'W 81°0'W 80°30'W 80°0'W 79°30'W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! N ' N ' 0 0 3 ° 3 ! ° 450559 460559 470559 480559 490559 500559 510559 520559 530559 0 0 5 5 ! v® Hospitals Provincial Highway ! ² 450558 460558 470558 480558 490558 500558 510558 520558 530558 ^_ Landing Sites Primary Road ! ! ! ! Utility Line Branch Road 430557 440557 450! 557 460557 470557 480557 490557 500557 510557 520557 530557 Railway Line ! ! 430556 440556 450556 460556 470556 480556 490556 500556 510556 520556 530556 5 2.5 0 5 10 15 ! Kilometers 1:800,000 ! ! ! ! 45! 0! 555 430555 440555 460555 470555 480555 490555 500555 510555 520555 530555 540555 550555 560555 570555 580555 590555 600555 ! ad ! ! o ^_ e R ak y L dre ! P u ! A O ! it t 6 t 1 e r o 430554 440554 450554 460554 470554 480554 490554 500554 510554 520554 530554 540554 550554 560554 570554 580554 590554 600554 r R R d! o ! d a y ! a ad a p H d o N i ' N o d R ' 0 ! s e R n ° 0 i 1 ° ! R M 0 h r d ! ! 0 u c o 5 Flatt Ext a to red ! F a a 5 e o e d D 4 R ! B 1 430553 440553 45055! 3 460553 470553 480553 490553 500553 510553 520553 530553 540553 550553 560553 570553 580553 590553 600553 R ! ! S C ! ! Li ttle d L Newpost Road ! a o ! ng ! o d R ! o R a a o d e ! R ! s C ! o e ! ! L 450552! ! g k i 430552 440552 ! 460552 470552 480552 490552 500552 510552 520552 530552 540552 550552 560552 570552 580552 590552 600552 C a 0 e ! n ! L U n S 1 i o ! ! ! R y p L ! N a p l ! y 8 C e e ^_ ! r k ^_ K C ! o ! S ! ! R a m t ! 8 ! t ! ! ! S a ! ! ! w ! ! 550551 a ! 430551 440551 450551
    [Show full text]
  • POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit
    POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit Kapuskasing Iroquois Falls Hearst Timmins Porcupine Cochrane Moosonee Hornepayne Matheson Smooth Rock Falls Population Profile Foyez Haque, MBBS, MHSc Public Health Epidemiologist published by: Th e Porcupine Health Unit Timmins, Ontario October 2009 ©2009 Population Profile - 2006 Census Acknowledgements I would like to express gratitude to those without whose support this Population Profile would not be published. First of all, I would like to thank the management committee of the Porcupine Health Unit for their continuous support of and enthusiasm for this publication. Dr. Dennis Hong deserves a special thank you for his thorough revision. Thanks go to Amanda Belisle for her support with editing, creating such a wonderful cover page, layout and promotion of the findings of this publication. I acknowledge the support of the Statistics Canada for history and description of the 2006 Census and also the definitions of the variables. Porcupine Health Unit – 1 Population Profile - 2006 Census 2 – Porcupine Health Unit Population Profile - 2006 Census Table of Contents Acknowledgements . 1 Preface . 5 Executive Summary . 7 A Brief History of the Census in Canada . 9 A Brief Description of the 2006 Census . 11 Population Pyramid. 15 Appendix . 31 Definitions . 35 Table of Charts Table 1: Population distribution . 12 Table 2: Age and gender characteristics. 14 Figure 3: Aboriginal status population . 16 Figure 4: Visible minority . 17 Figure 5: Legal married status. 18 Figure 6: Family characteristics in Ontario . 19 Figure 7: Family characteristics in Porcupine Health Unit area . 19 Figure 8: Low income cut-offs . 20 Figure 11: Mother tongue .
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on Facilitated Community Sessions March 2020
    FINAL REPORT ON FACILITATED COMMUNITY SESSIONS MARCH 2020 MCLEOD WOOD ASSOCIATES INC. #201-160 St David St. S., Fergus, ON N1M 2L3 phone: 519 787 5119 Selection of a Preferred Location for the New Community Table Summarizing Comments from Focus Groups Contents The New Community – a Five Step Process .................................................................................... 2 Background: ................................................................................................................................ 2 Steps Leading to Relocation: ................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Steps Two and Three .......................................................................................... 4 Summary of the Focus Group Discussions: ............................................................................. 5 Appendix One: Notes from Moose Factory Meeting held November 26 2019…………………………17 Appendix Two: Notes from Moosonee Meeting held November 28 2019………………………………23 1 Selection of a Preferred Location for the New Community Table Summarizing Comments from Focus Groups The New Community – a Five Step Process Background: The MoCreebec Council of the Cree Nation was formed on February 6, 1980 to contend with economic and health concerns and the social housing conditions facing the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA) beneficiaries that lived in Moose Factory and Moosonee. The JBNQA beneficiaries were mainly registered with three principal bands
    [Show full text]
  • TOXIC WATER: the KASHECHEWAN STORY Introduction It Was the Straw That Broke the Prover- Had Been Under a Boil-Water Alert on and Focus Bial Camel’S Back
    TOXIC WATER: THE KASHECHEWAN STORY Introduction It was the straw that broke the prover- had been under a boil-water alert on and Focus bial camel’s back. A fax arrived from off for years. In fall 2005, Canadi- Health Canada (www.hc-sc.gc.ca) at the A week after the water tested positive ans were stunned to hear of the Kashechewan First Nations council for E. coli, Indian Affairs Minister appalling living office, revealing that E. coli had been Andy Scott arrived in Kashechewan. He conditions on the detected in the reserve’s drinking water. offered to provide the people with more Kashechewan First Enough was enough. A community bottled water but little else. Incensed by Nations Reserve in already plagued by poverty and unem- Scott’s apparent indifference, the Northern Ontario. ployment was now being poisoned by community redoubled their efforts, Initial reports documented the its own water supply. Something putting pressure on the provincial and presence of E. coli needed to be done, and some members federal governments to evacuate those in the reserve’s of the reserve had a plan. First they who were suffering from the effects of drinking water. closed down the schools. Next, they the contaminated water. The Ontario This was followed called a meeting of concerned members government pointed the finger at Ot- by news of poverty and despair, a of the community. Then they launched tawa because the federal government is reflection of a a media campaign that shifted the responsible for Canada’s First Nations. standard of living national spotlight onto the horrendous Ottawa pointed the finger back at the that many thought conditions in this remote, Northern province, saying that water safety and unimaginable in Ontario reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • BY COURIER July 31, 2014 Ms. Kirsten Walli Secretary Ontario
    Hydro One Networks Inc. 7th Floor, South Tower Tel: (416) 345-5700 483 Bay Street Fax: (416) 345-5870 Toronto, Ontario M5G 2P5 Cell: (416) 258-9383 www.HydroOne.com [email protected] Susan Frank Vice President and Chief Regulatory Officer Regulatory Affairs BY COURIER July 31, 2014 Ms. Kirsten Walli Secretary Ontario Energy Board Suite 2700, 2300 Yonge Street P.O. Box 2319 Toronto, ON. M4P 1E4 Dear Ms. Walli: EB-2014-0244 – MAAD S86 Hydro One Networks Inc. Application to Purchase Haldimand County Utilities Inc. I am attaching two (2) paper copies of Hydro One Inc’s MAAD Application for the acquisition of Haldimand County Utilities Inc. Please note that information has been redacted in Exhibit A, Tab 3, Schedule 1, Attachment 6 pertaining to employee, property owner, and account information. An electronic copy of the complete application has been filed using the Board’s Regulatory Electronic Submission System. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY SUSAN FRANK Susan Frank attach. Filed: 2014-07-31 EB-2014-0244 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 1 of 6 1 ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD 2 3 IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15 (the “Act”). 4 5 IN THE MATTER OF an application made by Hydro One Inc. for leave for Hydro One Inc., 6 acting through its subsidiary 1908872 Inc.. (referred to collectively hereinafter as “Hydro One 7 Inc.”) to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of Haldimand County Utilities Inc., 8 made pursuant to section 86(2)(b) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT Between COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY
    COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT between COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA LOCAL 6 and NORTHERNTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Effective August 22, 2011 to February 28, 2014 04016 (09) TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE PAGE INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 4 ARTICLE 1 - RECOGNITION AND SCOPE........................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 2 - NO DISCRIMINATION ...................................................................................... 5 ARTICLE 3 - DEDUCTION FOR UNION DUES & HUMANITY FUND .................................. 6 ARTICLE 4 - RESERVATION OF MANAGEMENT RIGHTS................................................. 8 ARTICLE 5 - UNION REPRESENTATION............................................................................. 8 ARTICLE 6 - DUTIES OF STEWARDS.................................................................................. 8 ARTICLE 7 – COMPENSATION OF STEWARDS................................................................. 9 ARTICLE 8 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ............................................................................. 9 ARTICLE 9 - DISCIPLINE .................................................................................................... 11 ARTICLE 10 - STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS......................................................................... 12 ARTICLE 11 - SENIORITY..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017, Jones Road, Near Blackhawk, RAIN (Photo: Michael Dawber)
    Edited and Compiled by Rick Cavasin and Jessica E. Linton Toronto Entomologists’ Association Occasional Publication # 48-2018 European Skippers mudpuddling, July 6, 2017, Jones Road, near Blackhawk, RAIN (Photo: Michael Dawber) Dusted Skipper, April 20, 2017, Ipperwash Beach, LAMB American Snout, August 6, 2017, (Photo: Bob Yukich) Dunes Beach, PRIN (Photo: David Kaposi) ISBN: 978-0-921631-53-7 Ontario Lepidoptera 2017 Edited and Compiled by Rick Cavasin and Jessica E. Linton April 2018 Published by the Toronto Entomologists’ Association Toronto, Ontario Production by Jessica Linton TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION Board of Directors: (TEA) Antonia Guidotti: R.O.M. Representative Programs Coordinator The TEA is a non-profit educational and scientific Carolyn King: O.N. Representative organization formed to promote interest in insects, to Publicity Coordinator encourage cooperation among amateur and professional Steve LaForest: Field Trips Coordinator entomologists, to educate and inform non-entomologists about insects, entomology and related fields, to aid in the ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA preservation of insects and their habitats and to issue Published annually by the Toronto Entomologists’ publications in support of these objectives. Association. The TEA is a registered charity (#1069095-21); all Ontario Lepidoptera 2017 donations are tax creditable. Publication date: April 2018 ISBN: 978-0-921631-53-7 Membership Information: Copyright © TEA for Authors All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be Annual dues: reproduced or used without written permission. Individual-$30 Student-free (Association finances permitting – Information on submitting records, notes and articles to beyond that, a charge of $20 will apply) Ontario Lepidoptera can be obtained by contacting: Family-$35 Jessica E.
    [Show full text]
  • National Inquiry Into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls Truth-Gathering Process Part III Expert & Knowledge-K
    National Inquiry into Enquête nationale Missing and Murdered sur les femmes et les filles Indigenous Women and Girls autochtones disparues et assassinées National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls Truth-Gathering Process Part III Expert & Knowledge-Keeper Panel “Racism” Chelsea Hotel, Churchill Ballroom Toronto, Ontario Part III Volume VIII Monday June 11, 2018 Panel I: Intersections between Racism and 2SLGBTQ issues Albert McLeod, Two Spirited People of Manitoba (2SPM) Fallon Andy, Knowledge-keeper & Advocate Heard by Chief Commissioner Marion Buller & Commissioners Brian Eyolfson & Qajaq Robinson ___________________________ INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. 41-5450 Canotek Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1J 9G2 E-mail: [email protected] – Phone: 613-748-6043 – Fax: 613-748-8246 II APPEARANCES Aboriginal Women’s Action MiKenze Jordan(Representative) Network Assembly of First Nations Julie McGregor (Legal Counsel) Stuart Wuttke (Legal Counsel) Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs Joëlle Pastora Sala (Legal Counsel) Association of Native Child Sarah Beamish (Legal Counsel) and Family Service Agencies of Josephine de Whytell Ontario (ANCFSAO) (Legal Counsel) Awo Taan Healing Lodge Society Darrin Blain (Legal Counsel) Battered Women’s Support Angela Marie McDougall Services (Representative) Anemki Wedom(Representative) Canadian Association of Chiefs Ashley Smith(Legal Counsel) of Police(CACP) Director of Criminal and Penal Anny Bernier(Legal Counsel) Prosecution (Quebec) Easter Door Indigenous Natalie Clifford Association (Legal Counsel) Families for Justice Suzan E. Fraser (Legal Counsel) Government of Alberta Doreen Mueller (Legal Counsel) Government of British Columbia Rachel Holmes(Representative) Government of Canada Nancy Azzi (Legal Counsel) Marie-Eve Robillard (Legal Counsel) Government of Ontario Julian Roy(Legal Counsel) Catherine Rhinelander (Legal Counsel) Government of Manitoba Samuel Thompson(Legal Counsel) Government of New Brunswick Heather M.
    [Show full text]
  • Bies-Parents.Pdf
    1 MY PARENTS’S JOURNEY TO BECOMING CANADIANS by Ernie Bies. June 12. 2019 Jan Bies, left the old country ninety-two years ago to seek a new life in Canada. He had completed the mandatory military service in the newly formed country of Czechoslovakia. Enticed by agents who promised work on Western Canadian farms, and with the financial support of his mother, he signed on. After boarding the Canadian Pacific Railway (C.P.R) ship S.S. Montnairn in Antwerp on May 4th 1927, and celebrating a lonely 23rd birthday during the crossing, he arrived in Quebec City on May 13, 1927. Of the 517 passengers on board, almost 200 were from Czechoslovakia and many, like my father, were bound to meet Mr. C.A. Van Scoy, Superintendent of Colonization, C.P.R. in Winnipeg Manitoba. His status was Landed Immigrant and he had $25 in his pocket. From Quebec City he went to Montreal where he boarded the C.P.R. train to Winnipeg ready to start his Canadian journey. Chester Allan Van Scoy, along with Dr. William John Black, his counterpart at the Canadian National Railway (C.N.R.) Department of Colonization, Agriculture and Natural Resources, were responsible for bringing hundreds of thousands of European immigrants to the Canadian west in the mid to late 1920s under terms of the Railway Agreement. 2 The Railway Agreement of 1925. Following the First World War, immigration policies in Canada were very restrictive. Landing in Canada of alien enemies was prohibited with some allowances made for those countries whose independence was recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (Previously Submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013
    Summary of Consultation to Support the Côté Gold Project Closure Plan Côté Gold Project Appendix A IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (previously submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013 Stakeholder Consultation Plan (2013) TC180501 | October 2018 CÔTÉ GOLD PROJECT PROVINCIAL INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE APPENDIX D PROPOSED STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PLAN Submitted to: IAMGOLD Corporation 401 Bay Street, Suite 3200 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y4 Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, a Division of AMEC Americas Limited 160 Traders Blvd. East, Suite 110 Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 3K7 July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Provincial EA and Consultation Plan Requirements ........................................... 1-1 1.3 Federal EA and Consultation Plan Requirements .............................................. 1-2 1.4 Responsibility for Plan Implementation .............................................................. 1-3 2.0 CONSULTATION APPROACH ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholder Identification ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL 2009 Annual Report
    NEOnet 2009 Annual Report Infrastructure Enhancement Application Education and Awareness 2009 Annual Report Table of Contents Message from the Chair ..............................................................................................2 Corporate Profile........................................................................................................3 Mandate ....................................................................................................................3 Regional Profile ..........................................................................................................4 Catchment Area.......................................................................................................................................................5 NEOnet Team .............................................................................................................6 Organizational Chart..............................................................................................................................................6 Core Staff Members...............................................................................................................................................7 Leaving staff members..........................................................................................................................................8 Board of Directors ..................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]