WHO/WHAT/WHERE - Agriculture Northern Rakhine State - Buthidaung, Maungdaw, Rathedaung Townships

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WHO/WHAT/WHERE - Agriculture Northern Rakhine State - Buthidaung, Maungdaw, Rathedaung Townships Myanmar Information Management Unit WHO/WHAT/WHERE - Agriculture Northern Rakhine State - Buthidaung, Maungdaw, Rathedaung Townships BANGLADESH Bauk Shu Ye Hpweit Aung San Ya Bway 1 1 CHIN STATE Kyaung Kha Maung Na Hpay Thit Tone Nar Hlaing Thi Seik 1 Gwa 1 2 Son Nan 2 Ya r Kai ng Nga 2 Ya nt Cha ung 2 Ta Man Thar 2 Ya e Nauk Ngar Thar Kyaung Taung Thet Kaing Nyar Pa Da Kar 2 1 2 Mee Taik Ywar Pa Da Kar 1 Thit Day War San Kar 3 Nar Li Pin Yin 2 Kun Thee Min Gyi 1 Pin (Tu Lar Myo Wet Kyein 1 Tu Li) Mi 4 1 Chaung 1 Kyun Done Goke Myaw Pauk Paik (Aung 1 Pi Chaung Seik Pyin) 1 1 3 Ya e Kyein Chaung 3 Buthidaung Township Twin Ta Ya Laung Don Pyin Myauk Gu 4 1 Ye (a) Pan Be Chaung 1 2 Doe Sa Bai Tan Kone Ngar Sar Yin 1 3 Ah Htet Kyu Ma Pyu Ma 5 Kyaung 1 Kyet Yoe Pyin Taung Zee Hton 1 Yae Myet Taung 5 2 1 Ngan Chaung 4 Pwint Hpyu Hpar Wut Nga Yant Yae Khat Chaung (Ywar Chaung Chaung Chaung Gwa Thit) Inn 2 1 Kyar Son Myaw 4 Chaung Thin Ga Gaung 1 Taung 3 Net Taun g 1 3 1 Mee Chaung Maung Mee Hna Ma Khaung Chaung Maungdaw Township 4 Laung Swea Dar Zay Chaung Paing 5 2 1 Nga Sa Yar Tha Kyin Tauk 4 Chin Yet Ok e 4 Tha Kyauktaw 1 Thet Kyee Maung Mar Kay Pyin Kan Pyin Tat Min Chaung Gyi Htaunt 3 1 3 2 4 Zin Paing Kun Taing (a) Zee Pin Ywar Nyar Kyauk Hpyu Taung Taung Nwar Yon Ma Tha Yet 2 3 Nan 4 Taun g 3 Ya r Kin Pyin 3 Let Wea Det Kone Ma Nu Chaung Pu Zun Chaung Let Wea 2 1 Bat Kar Gone Nar Det Pyin 3 3 Da Pyu 3 Shey Ka Kyet Bet Chaung Aye Tar 4 Kan Pyin Ywet Shwe Zar Myo 2 Li Yar 3 Nyo Kin Taung Kat Pa Kaung Thu Gyi Ka 2 2 Kyet Bet Taung (a) Kyar 3 Ba Ah 1 2 Nyo Pyin Nyaung Gone Nar Twin 1 Chaung 3 Myaung U Hla Hnget Tha 2 Nar Hpay Thay Urban Yet Pyi n Tha 1Ah 3 3 2 4 Yet Pyi n Lel Chaung Lay 4 Ba Gone Nar 2 Myo Pan Taw Kin 2 2 Hpon Pyin Chaung Wa Ya 1 Nyo Leik 2 (Du) Kyun San Goe (Du) 3 Kyauk Chee Yar Tan 2 Taung Pa Din Nyaung Tha Ya nt 3 Sein 3 2 Pin Gyi Hnyin Peik 3 2 Say Oe Kya Ywar Thit Kay Pyar Taung 1 Sa (Pa) (Gaw Du Thar Ra) 3 2 Par Htar Nyaung Zaw 4 Gu Dar Hpa Yar Pyin 1 Pin Ma Tet Pyin Thein Tan Wet Ma Kya Gyi 2 Tha Yae Kone Tan 1 2 (a) Zay Di Yae Gaung 1 2 Taung Kyauk Hpyu 1 Sin Ya e Chaung Than Dar Thar Thay Khone Gaung Chaung 1 Mrauk-U Kan Hpu Hpa 2 Kan Thay Kan Tai ng 1 War Cha 4 Yon Chaung Gwa Son 1 1 Say 2 2 2 Chein Khar Li Oke Taung 3 Hpo (Oe 1 Say U Hpauk) Taung Ah Htet Ah Lel Than Daung Hpa Yar 2 1 Zee Kywe Cho Yet Kyaw 3 Pyin Aung Pa Khaung Maw Khone Ya e S oe 4 4 Zee 1 1 Tai ng Chaung Tha Thein 1 Khaung 1 Pyay Taw Kywe 1 Nga San Gaw Yar Taung 1 Pyaing Yine Khat Baw Khar Li Pyin Taung 2 1 3 3 Du 3 Nga Myin Oe Hpet Hlan Pyin Hlut Thei Ma Leik 1 Ya e 5 Pauk 2 2 Taw Kyein Myet Kyauk Tan Thein 2 1 Taung Tan 2 2 1 Pyin Nwar Hla Chut Shey Kyaw Pyin 1 1 2 Zay Di Pyin Htee Kyauk 3 Swea Pan Du Auk Nan Yar 2 Thaung 2 2 Da Rar Ah Pauk Pin Yin Htet Gwa 1 (Pauk Taw) Sa Par Ponnagyun Thin Nan Son 1 Htar Baw Kwe Ya r 1 1 3 2 Kha Bar Naung Ta Lay Gyi Bay of Bengal 1 1 Inn Din Nga 3 Tauk Tu Thit Chay Pyar Ka Toe 1 Chaung 1 Yan Aung Pyin Gyi Tha 1 1 Win Chaung Kon Kyauk Sar 2 Tan Pauk Tai ng Nat Chaung 2 Taw 1 1 1 Myin Hpu 1 Aung Ku Taung Seik 2 1 Than Ah Nauk Pyin Chaung 1 Thar 1 Tha Yet Chaung Zay 1 Htaunt Laung 1 Chaung Kan 2 Pyin 1 Rathedaung Township Pauktaw Kilometers Sittwe 010205 Minbya Data Sources : MIMU 3W Map ID: MIMU334v1 AGRICULTURE Village Tract Name Village Tract Boundary Number of Organization Set San Creation Date: 15 Dec 2009. A3 Township Boundary Village tract boundary: UNICEF; Other 1 1 boundaries: WFP modified by MIMU 2 State Boundary Note: AZG and BAJ Project data received from secondary sources but 3 - 5 International Boundary Number of organisations Map produced by the MIMU - [email protected] No Projects Under Implementation Reported working in Village Tract Disclaimer: The names shown and the boundaries used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations..
Recommended publications
  • Rakhine State Needs Assessment September 2015
    Rakhine State Needs Assessment September 2015 This document is published by the Center for Diversity and National Harmony with the support of the United Nations Peacebuilding Fund. Publisher : Center for Diversity and National Harmony No. 11, Shweli Street, Kamayut Township, Yangon. Offset : Public ation Date : September 2015 © All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Rakhine State, one of the poorest regions in Myanmar, has been plagued by communal problems since the turn of the 20th century which, coupled with protracted underdevelopment, have kept residents in a state of dire need. This regrettable situation was compounded from 2012 to 2014, when violent communal riots between members of the Muslim and Rakhine communities erupted in various parts of the state. Since the middle of 2012, the Myanmar government, international organisations and non-governmen- tal organisations (NGOs) have been involved in providing humanitarian assistance to internally dis- placed and conflict-affected persons, undertaking development projects and conflict prevention activ- ities. Despite these efforts, tensions between the two communities remain a source of great concern, and many in the international community continue to view the Rakhine issue as the biggest stumbling block in Myanmar’s reform process. The persistence of communal tensions signaled a need to address one of the root causes of conflict: crushing poverty. However, even as various stakeholders have attempted to restore normalcy in the state, they have done so without a comprehensive needs assessment to guide them. In an attempt to fill this gap, the Center for Diversity and National Harmony (CDNH) undertook the task of developing a source of baseline information on Rakhine State, which all stakeholders can draw on when providing humanitarian and development assistance as well as when working on conflict prevention in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Remaking Rakhine State
    REMAKING RAKHINE STATE Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: Aerial photograph showing the clearance of a burnt village in northern Rakhine State (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. © Private https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 16/8018/2018 Original language: English amnesty.org INTRODUCTION Six months after the start of a brutal military campaign which forced hundreds of thousands of Rohingya women, men and children from their homes and left hundreds of Rohingya villages burned the ground, Myanmar’s authorities are remaking northern Rakhine State in their absence.1 Since October 2017, but in particular since the start of 2018, Myanmar’s authorities have embarked on a major operation to clear burned villages and to build new homes, security force bases and infrastructure in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2020 (23:45 Yangon Time)
    Allocation Strategy Paper 2020: FIRST STANDARD ALLOCATION DEADLINE: Monday, 20 July 2020 (23:45 Yangon time) I. ALLOCATION OVERVIEW I.1. Introduction This document lays the strategy to allocating funds from the Myanmar Humanitarian Fund (MHF) First Standard Allocation to scale up the response to the protracted humanitarian crises in Myanmar, in line with the 2020 Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP). The allocation responds also to the critical underfunded situation of humanitarian requirements by mid-June 2020. As of 20 June, only 23 per cent of the 2020 HRP requirements, including the revised COVID-19 Addendum, have been met up to now (29 per cent in the case of the mentioned addendum), which is very low in comparison with donor contributions against the HRP in previous years for the same period (50 per cent in 2019 and 40 per cent in 2018). This standard allocation will make available about US$7 million to support coordinated humanitarian assistance and protection, covering displaced people and other vulnerable crisis-affected people in Chin, Rakhine, Kachin and Shan states. The allocation will not include stand-alone interventions related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has been already supported through a Reserve Allocation launched in April 2020, resulting in ten funded projects amounting a total of $3.8 million that are already being implemented. Nevertheless, COVID-19 related actions may be mainstreamed throughout the response to the humanitarian needs. In addition, activities in Kayin State will not be included in this allocation, due to the ongoing projects and level of funding as per HRP requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Malteser MCH-PHC-WASH Activities in Maungdaw Township Rakhine State
    Myanmar Information Management Unit Malteser MCH-PHC-WASH Activities in Maungdaw Township Rakhine State 92°10'E 92°20'E 92°30'E Chin Mandalay PALETWA BANGLADESH Ü Rakhine Magway Baw Tu Lar In Tu Lar Bago Tat Chaung Myo Naw Yar Hpar Zay Dar A®vung Tha Pyay San Su Ri Ayeyarwady Kar Lar Day Hpet N N ' ' 0 0 2 !< Myo (Ye Aung Chaung) 2 ° ° 1 Kyaung Toe Mar Zay 1 2 !< !< 2 Bwin (Baung)!< Aung Zan !< Gu Mi Yar Shee Dar !< Ye Aung San Ya Bway V# !< Kyaung Na Hpay (Myo) Kaung Na Phay Ah Nauk Tan Chaung Gaw Yan Ywa Tone Chaung !< !< #0 Ah Shey Htan Chaung (Htan Kar Li) Taing Bin Gar !< !< Ye Bauk Kyar Taung Pyo Sin Thay Pyin #0 !< #0 C! Ah Shey Kha Maung Seik Sin Shey Myo Kha Mg Seick (Nord) !< Mi Kyaung Chaung Ah Htet Bo Ka Lay Baw Taw Lar !< !< Ah San Kyaw !< Hlaing Thi !< Nga Yant Chaung Nan Yar Kaing (M) Auk Bo Ka Lay Min Zi Li !< !< Kyee Hnoke Thee V# Thit Tone Nar Gwa Son BANGLADESH #0 Let Yar Chaung Kyaung Zar Hpyu XY Ta Man Thar Ah Shey (Ku Lar) Pan Zi Ta Man Thar (Thet) Ta Man Thar (Ku Lar) Middle !< C! XY Ta Man Thar Thea Kone Tan C! Ta Man Thar Ah Nauk Rakhine Nga/Myin Baw Kha Mway Ta Man Thar TaunXYg Ta Man Thar Zay Nar/ Tan Tta MXYan Thar (Bo Hmu Gyi Thet) Yae Nauk Ngar Thar (Daing Nat) C! Nga/Myin Baw Ku Lar Taungpyoletwea XY Yae Nauk Ngar Thar (!v® Hpaung Seik Taung Pyo Let Yar Mee Taik Ba Da Kar That Kaing Nyar (Thet) BUTHIDAUNG Tha Ra Zaing !< Ah Yaing Kwet Chay C! !<Laung Boke Long Boat Hpon Thi #0 Aung Zay Ya (Nyein Chan Yay) Thin Baw Hla (Ku Lar) That Chaung Pu Zun Chaung !< Gara Pyin Ye Aung Chaung Thin Baw Hla (Rakhine) (Thar
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Rome Statute
    ICC-01/19-7 04-07-2019 1/146 RH PT Cour Penale (/\Tl\) _ni _t_e__r an _t_oi _n_a_l_e �i��------------------ ----- International �� �d? Crimi nal Court Original: English No.: ICC-01/19 Date: 4 July 2019 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia, Presiding Judge Judge Robert Fremr Judge Geoffrey Henderson SITUATION IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH / REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR PUBLIC With Confidential EX PARTE Annexes 1, 5, 7 and 8, and Public Annexes 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10 Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15 Source: Office of the Prosecutor ICC-01/19-7 04-07-2019 2/146 RH PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Ms Fatou Bensouda Mr James Stewart Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Counsel Support Section Mr Peter Lewis Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section Victims Participation and Reparations Other Section Mr Philipp Ambach No. ICC-01/19 2/146 4 July 2019 ICC-01/19-7 04-07-2019 3/146 RH PT CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 II. LEVEL OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND REQUESTED PROCEDURE .................... 8 III. PROCEDURAL
    [Show full text]
  • UNOSAT Analysis of Destruction and Other Developments in Rakhine State, Myanmar
    UNOSAT analysis of destruction and other developments in Rakhine State, Myanmar 7 September 2018 [Geneva, Switzerland] Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Data and Methods ................................................................................................................................... 2 Satellite Images and Processing .......................................................................................................... 2 Satellite Image Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 3 Fire Detection Data ............................................................................................................................. 5 Fire Detection Data Analysis ............................................................................................................... 6 Settlement Locations ........................................................................................................................... 6 Estimation of the destroyed structures .............................................................................................. 6 Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Destruction Visible in Satellite Imagery .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rakhine State, Myanmar
    World Food Programme S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 Photographs: ©FAO/F. Del Re/L. Castaldi and ©WFP/K. Swe. This report has been prepared by Monika Tothova and Luigi Castaldi (FAO) and Yvonne Forsen, Marco Principi and Sasha Guyetsky (WFP) under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP secretariats with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned for further information if required. Mario Zappacosta Siemon Hollema Senior Economist, EST-GIEWS Senior Programme Policy Officer Trade and Markets Division, FAO Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific, WFP E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ The Global Information and Early Warning System on Food and Agriculture (GIEWS) has set up a mailing list to disseminate its reports. To subscribe, submit the Registration Form on the following link: http://newsletters.fao.org/k/Fao/trade_and_markets_english_giews_world S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rohingyas of Rakhine State: Social Evolution and History in the Light of Ethnic Nationalism
    RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ORIENTAL STUDIES Eurasian Center for Big History & System Forecasting SOCIAL EVOLUTION Studies in the Evolution & HISTORY of Human Societies Volume 19, Number 2 / September 2020 DOI: 10.30884/seh/2020.02.00 Contents Articles: Policarp Hortolà From Thermodynamics to Biology: A Critical Approach to ‘Intelligent Design’ Hypothesis .............................................................. 3 Leonid Grinin and Anton Grinin Social Evolution as an Integral Part of Universal Evolution ............. 20 Daniel Barreiros and Daniel Ribera Vainfas Cognition, Human Evolution and the Possibilities for an Ethics of Warfare and Peace ........................................................................... 47 Yelena N. Yemelyanova The Nature and Origins of War: The Social Democratic Concept ...... 68 Sylwester Wróbel, Mateusz Wajzer, and Monika Cukier-Syguła Some Remarks on the Genetic Explanations of Political Participation .......................................................................................... 98 Sarwar J. Minar and Abdul Halim The Rohingyas of Rakhine State: Social Evolution and History in the Light of Ethnic Nationalism .......................................................... 115 Uwe Christian Plachetka Vavilov Centers or Vavilov Cultures? Evidence for the Law of Homologous Series in World System Evolution ............................... 145 Reviews and Notes: Henri J. M. Claessen Ancient Ghana Reconsidered .............................................................. 184 Congratulations
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar 2014-2016 / Conflict
    CONFLICT A.2 / MMYYANMAR 2014-2016 / CONFLICT ASIA - PACIFIC CASE STUDY MYANMAR 2014-2016 / CONFLICT KEYWORDS: Individual housing, Cash assistance, Advocacy, Community participation, Protection CRISIS Inter-communal violence, Rakhine, 2012. TOTAL PEOPLE 145,000 displaced due to 2012 violence AFFECTED (119,560 as of Nov 2016). INDIA KACHIN CHINA PROJECT Rakhine State, Myanmar (Townships of Mrauk-U, LOCATIONS Kyauktaw and Minbya, Rathedaung and Pauktaw). BENEFICIARIES 25,000 individuals (approx.). SAGAING BANGLADESH PROJECT OUTPUTS 4,737 beneficiary-led houses. SHAN SHELTER SIZE1 Min. 16.7 m2 (4.6m x 3.7m basic design). CHIN MANDALAY THE LAO 2 SHELTER DENSITY Min. 3.4 m /person (average 5 members per family). PEOPLE’S RAKHINE MAGWAY DEMO- CRATIC PROJECT COST USD 1,000 (Labour cost = USD 160; Materials, Logis- REPUBLIC PER SHELTER tics, Transport, etc. = USD 840). KAYAH BAY OF BAGO THAILAND OCCUPANCY RATE 100% (estimated). BENGAL PROJECT SUMMARY YANGON AYEYARWADY KAYIN This was a beneficiary-led, cash-based, project that allowed fami- MON lies displaced due to inter-communal violence to vacate their temporary shelter and rebuild their houses. The project enabled the construction of 4,737 houses for a marginalized group in a highly volatile environment, PROJECT AREAS TANINTHARYI where some stakeholders were keen to use a contractor-driven ap- proach. In fact, the more discreet owner-driven methodology, used in 1 Note: families were free to increase the size or modify the this project, proved highly effective. house design according to their needs. JUL 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2 3 4 5 CONFLICT / VIOLENCE PLANNING PHASE 1 PHASE 2 TIMELINE SEP OCT JAN MAR JUL OCT APR 1 Jan 2013: Activation of Shelter Cluster.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Tracts of Northern Rakhine State (Buthidaung, Maungdaw, Rathedaung Townships ) N N ' ' 0 0
    Myanmar Information Management Unit Village Tracts of northern Rakhine State (Buthidaung, Maungdaw, Rathedaung Townships ) N N ' ' 0 0 3 92°30'E 93°0'E 3 ° ° 1 1 2 2 BANGLADESH Tat Chaung In Tu Lar CHIN STATE Kar Lar Day Hpet Bauk Shu Ye Aung San Hpweit Ya Bway Paletwa Kyaung (! Samee Na Hpay !( Hlaing Thi Kha Maung Seik Ba Da Kar Nan Yar Thit Tone Kaing Nar Gwa Nga Yant Son Mee Taik Chaung (Taungpyoletwea Sub-township) Ta Man Thar Yae Nauk Taungpyoletwea Ngar Thar !( Thet Kaing Kha Maung Pa Da Kyaung Taung Tin May Nyar Chaung Taung Pyo Let Yar Kar Day (Taungpyoletwea War Nar Li Sub-township) Thea Chaung (Taungpyoletwea Pa Da Kar Kun Thee Pin Sub-township) San Kar Ywar Thit (Taungpyoletwea Pin Yin Sub-township) Min Gyi (Tu Lar Wet Kyein Laung Yon Leik Ya Tu Li) Done Paik Kyun Pauk Goke Pi (Taungpyoletwea (Aung Seik Sub-township) Kyun Pauk Sin Oe Pyin) (Taungpyoletwea Kyauk Chaung Sub-township) Kyein Chaung (Taungpyoletwea Myaw Chaung Sub-township) Laung Don Ta Ya Gu Zee Pin Chaung Myauk Ye (a) (Taungpyoletwea Pan Be Chaung Sub-township) Sa Bai Kone Ah Htet Pyu Ma Ka Yin Ma Nyin Tan Pyu Ma Doe Ngar Sar Kyu Kyaung Myo Tan Zee Hton Pyu Ma Ka Taung Nyin Tan Thit Kyet Yoe Pyin Aw Ra Ma (a) Kat Pa Kaung Yae Yee Chaung Nga Khu Ya Ngan Chaung N Pyin Hla N ' Nga Khu Ya Myet Taung Nga Yant ' 0 0 ° U Shey Kya Pwint Hpar Wut Chaung ° 1 Hpyu Chaung Ba Da Nar 1 2 Chan Chaung Thin Ga Net 2 Kyar Gaung (Ywar Thit) Pyin Inn Chaung Taung Myaw Oke Taung Yae Twin Yae Khat Taung Mee Chaung Mee Kyun Chaung Gwa Son Maung Khaung Chaung Zay Ywet Nyoe Dar Gyi Zar
    [Show full text]
  • Atrocity Crimes Against Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine State, Myanmar
    BEARING WITNESS REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 “THEY TRIED TO KILL US ALL” Atrocity Crimes against Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine State, Myanmar SIMON-SKJODT CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Washington, DC www.ushmm.org The United States Holocaust Museum’s work on genocide and related crimes against humanity is conducted by the Simon-Skjodt Center for the Prevention of Genocide. The Simon-Skjodt Center is dedicated to stimulating timely global action to prevent genocide and to catalyze an international response when it occurs. Our goal is to make the prevention of genocide a core foreign policy priority for leaders around the world through a multipronged program of research, education, and public outreach. We work to equip decision makers, starting with officials in the United States but also extending to other governments and institutions, with the knowledge, tools, and institutional support required to prevent— or, if necessary, halt—genocide and related crimes against humanity. FORTIFY RIGHTS Southeast Asia www.fortifyrights.org Fortify Rights works to ensure and defend human rights for all. We investigate human rights violations, engage policy makers and others, and strengthen initiatives led by human rights defenders, affected communities, and civil society. We believe in the influence of evidence- based research, the power of strategic truth-telling, and the importance of working closely with individuals, communities, and movements pushing for change. We are an independent, nonprofit organization based in Southeast Asia and registered in the United States and Switzerland. The United State Holocaust Memorial Museum uses the name “Burma” and Fortify Rights uses the name “Myanmar” to describe the same country.
    [Show full text]
  • Rakhine State – in Need of Fundamental Solutions
    Rakhine State – In Need of Fundamental Solutions Discussion Paper Prepared for Proximity Designs | Myanmar February 24, 2017 (revised April 24, 2017) This policy note was written by David Dapice ([email protected]) following trips to the region in January, July, and December 2016. The views expressed herein are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect those of Proximity, the Government of the Union of Myanmar, or Harvard University. Issues discussed in this paper are aimed to facilitate dialogue among the citizens of Myanmar, who are ultimately responsible for making decisions regarding the country’s policy choices. This piece, along with other recent Ash-Proximity reports on Myanmar, is posted at http://ash.harvard.edu/journal-articles and www.ash.harvard.edu/myanmar-program Rakhine State – In Need of Fundamental Solutions Page 2 of 6 Context Rakhine State is in a state of conflict. There is a relatively small number of mostly local, Islamic trained insurgents who are attacking military and police units primarily in Maungdaw, a township in the north next to Bangladesh.1 These extremists are operating under the cover of one million desperately poor Muslims who have been locked up in their township for four years. By mixing in with the villagers, it is impossible to fight a “clean” battle; one army major was killed when he had his troops cease fire on women and children, but the extremists were hidden in the group and shot him.2 There is said to be financial support coming from abroad, distributed through Imams in some of the mosques.
    [Show full text]