<<

Dr. Michel Laberge

Fusion Forum – Edmonton, Alberta CONFIDENTIAL- November 4, 2017 Fusion is Reaching an Inflection Point

• Last ten years have seen a surge in the investigation of alternative approaches and technologies for fusion energy.

• Advances in physics, electronics and digital controls, computer simulation, materials and construction technics (3D printing) have opened up new avenues for developing plants.

2 Emergence of Private Ventures

• Emergence of private companies taking advantage of new knowledge and technologies to pursue more practical pathways to commercial fusion energy.

• The companies are building world class teams and research centers, and are working closely with publicly funded institutions.

3 Alternate Concepts Share Common Themes

• Accept risk of new science and technology in exchange for a clearer pathway to a commercially viable fusion power plant. • Aim to overcome the challenges facing commercialization of traditional approaches

4 Many Approaches

• Today we’ll cover • Magnetic confinement: Spherical , , z pinch and Field Reversed Configuration (FRC) • (MTF) • Further reading: • Lockheed Martin –Magnetic Cusp • making a comeback with better end plug (gas dynamic)

5 Fusion: A spectrum of technology pathways

Magnetic Confinement Fusion Magnetized Target Fusion Inertial Confinement Fusion

All Confinement Balanced All Compression

• Very large, low density • Medium density • Very high density • Continuous • Slow pulses • Super fast pulses • Massive, expensive magnets • No large magnets or lasers • Expensive high power lasers • Materials and stability issues • Few materials and control issues • Efficiency and control issues • (ITER, Wendelstein 7-X, Energy) • (, ) • (National Ignition Facility)

6 Tokamak toroidal field > poloidal

7 Magnetic Confinement:

• Utilising new high temperature superconductor technology to reduce size of tokamak devices • MIT, Tokamak Energy (UK)

8 Field Reversed Configuration (FRC) poloidal field only

9 Magnetic Confinement: FRC

• Privately funded venture based in California • Variant of Field Reversed Configuration • Pursuing different fuel (p11-B) • require temperatures of 5 billion degrees Celsius

10 Z pinch toroidal field only

11 MagLIF – Sandia National Lab, USA

Open field lines Z-pinch: faster compression, smaller plasma compared to General Fusion Government research Impressive yield in 2013

MagLIF achieved good results in late 2013 with significant neutron production 12 Spheromak poloidal field>toroidal

13 Magnetized Target Fusion • Intermediate region between magnetic confinement and inertial confinement • Potential for lower cost compression driver and plasma confinement • Possible pathways to a commercially viable power plant

14 Magnetized Target Fusion

1. Form a compact torus of plasma

2. Confine in conductive chamber

3. Compress and heat to fusion conditions

4. Repeat

15 About General Fusion

• Developing a fusion power plant • Based in Burnaby, BC • Started in 2002

• 75 employees • ~50 scientists & engineers • 12 PhDs • Raised over $100 million

16 17 Advantages of General Fusion’s approach

Liquid Metal Wall Compressed Gas Driver No Consumables

• A major practical Practical, existing technology Zero-cost plasma targets advantage • Absorbs energy for heat • Steam powered pistons • Target is comprised only exchangers create compression of magnetized plasma

• Protects outer wall from • No exotic lasers or giant • No expensive target damage magnets capsules as associated • Produces fuel from liquid with other pulsed , high breeding • Less than 1% of the cost of systems ratio (1.6) other fusion drivers

18 Compression system

• 1m sphere with 14 full size drivers • 15 ton molten Pb storage • 100 kg/s pumping • Vortex formation and collapse • Piston impact velocity (50 m/s) and timing control (±5 µs) achieved

19 Twitter Instagram LinkedIn @generalfusion @generalfusion general-fusion 20