Parnasimautik Consultation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parnasimautik Consultation Report PARNASIMAUTIK CONSULTATION REPORT On the Consultations Carried Out with Nunavik Inuit in 2013 PARNASIMAUTIK CONSULTATION REPORT ON THE CONSULTATIONS CARRIED OUT WITH NUNAVIK INUIT IN 2013 NOVEMBER 14, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE 1 INTRODUCTION Nunavik Context 3 Nunavik Today 7 WHO WE ARE Culture, Language and Identity 13 Lands 27 Food Security 37 OUR COMMUNITIES Families 47 Education 57 Health and Social Services 69 Justice and Social Regulation 83 Cost of Living and Housing 95 Local Development and Essential Services 113 Employment 123 OUR REGION Regional Development 139 Regional Planning 161 CONCLUSION 169 APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Eras of Exploitation 173 Appendix 2 – Chronology 187 Appendix 3 – All-Organizations Statements 213 Appendix 4 – What Was Said Bulletins 219 Introduction Message from the Core Group MESSAGE FROM THE CORE GROUP In September 2010, Plan Nunavik was tabled with the Québec government by Nunavik Inuit. Plan Nunavik was a sector by sector response to the Plan Nord, in preparation at that time. It described the context in which the 1975 James Bay and Northern Québec Agreement and the 2002 Sanarrutik Agreement were signed, and told about life and current conditions in Nunavik communities. Plan Nunavik also set pre-conditions for our support for the development of the north. Four years later, these pre-conditions have still not been met. While Plan Nunavik was being drafted by our regional organizations in the summer of 2010, there was no time for community consultations. The Québec government, which was driving the political agenda and timetable, had plans to release its Plan Nord early in 2011. A change in government in 2012 gave Nunavik Inuit an opportunity to broaden regional discussion on Plan Nunavik. At a Nunavik all-organizations meeting held in Kuujjuaq in September 2012, participants agreed that the work begun in 2010 was important and that community consultations should be organized to identify a comprehensive vision of development according to Inuit culture, identity, language and traditional way of life so as to protect them now and enhance them for the future. Lands, families, justice, employment and the environment were added to the list of fundamental sectors already contained in Plan Nunavik. Between September and December 2012, the President of the Makivik Corporation, Jobie Tukkiapik, and the Chairperson of the Kativik Regional Government, Maggie Emudluk, made formal presentations to the boards of directors of regional organizations. Then, between February and December 2013, we attended workshops organized in all the communities, as well as in Chisasibi, Kawachikamach and Montreal. At the workshops, local group and committee representatives discussed the fundamental issues affecting their day-to-day lives, individual residents stepped up to the microphone to voice their ideas, and whole communities listened to discussions from work or home on their local FM radio station. What Was Said bulletins were produced after each workshop and transmitted to local leaders for distribution. Each community was encouraged to continue its own local Parnasimautik process. Parnasimautik has generated a good deal of enthusiasm all around Nunavik, and rightly so. Parnasimautik has allowed us to reflect on our past, present and future. It has been an exercise in regional and local mobilization. In 2014, a regional radio call-in show, a youth conference and a presentation to the annual general meeting of the Makivik Corporation were conducted. Throughout the summer, the Parnasimautik core group transformed community feedback on Who We Are, Our Communities and Our Region into a report with a comprehensive vision for the renewal future of Nunavik Inuit, families and communities, as well as for the renewal of our relationship with our regional Parnasimautik Consultation Report Page 1 November 2014 November 14, 2014 Introduction Nunavik Context NUNAVIK CONTEXT Nunavik is a vast region stretching from northern James Bay in the south, north to Hudson Strait including portions of eastern Hudson Bay and the entirety of Ungava Bay. It is bounded to the south by the 55th parallel and to the east by Labrador. Nunavik is the homeland for 11,000 Inuit who live in 14 communities, including a small number of Inuit living in Chisasibi. Archeological evidence indicates that Inuit have lived and used this region in a continuous manner for over 4000 years. The first recorded European contact was in 1610 when Sir Martin Frobisher, in his ill-fated search for the Northwest Passage, sailed into Hudson Bay. During the 1600s numerous other explorers, whalers, missionaries and traders came and went. Nunavik Inuit remained essentially isolated until the early 1700s when whalers began coming into the region. While there was some reported contact with Inuit in whaling journals, it was not until the arrival of the fur trading companies in the late 1800s that more sustained contact occurred. This was facilitated by a land grant from the King of England to his cousin Rupert. This created ‘Rupert’s Land” and a monopoly for the Hudson Bay Company to exploit furs in a huge portion of northern Canada, including present-day Nunavik. Before the arrival of the fur traders, Inuit were living as they always had – setting camp, traveling and harvesting according to the seasons and animal migrations. Winter camps were generally more established. These were typically extended families living in igloos and using dog sleds for transportation. The main food source was caribou, seal and fish. In the summer months family groups fanned out along the coast and in river valleys, living in skin tents, hunting migratory birds, marine mammals, fishing and gathering berries. The arrival of the Europeans brought an arsenal of problems. Disease, particularly measles and tuberculosis, ravaged camps and families. Dependency on trade goods shifted the seasonal cycle and drew families into a debt and credit relationship with the trading posts based on the ability to produce furs. Missionaries challenged spiritual beliefs and social norms. Inuit were invisible to the outside world and were treated as providers of fur and heathens to be converted. The next 50 years were characterized by some significant shifts in territorial boundaries. The Act respecting the North-Western, Northern and North-Eastern Boundaries of the Province of Québec of 1898 extended the boundaries northward to the 52nd parallel which began the northward reach of governments without any consultation with aboriginal groups. Then in the Québec Boundaries Extension Act of 1912, there was another enlargement capturing the entirety of present-day mainland Nunavik. During these land grabs, both governments ignored their obligations to the people living there and to address their most basic needs. Disease and starvation took their toll. Inuit and other aboriginal groups were totally neglected by governments. The worst was yet to come. Beginning in the mid-1950s the federal government established a policy to try and entice people off the land and settle them into small communities in order to be Parnasimautik Consultation Report Page 3 November 2014 Nunavik Context Introduction more easily administered. Rudimentary housing, health services, schools and policing were provided. Typically a community site would be located where a trading post or mission had already been established and where a pattern of dependency had set in. Thus began the shift from a subsistence lifestyle to one where access to money became important. Inuit were still very much living off the land, but their patterns of land use changed and hunting equipment moved from dog teams, harpoons and rudimentary weapons to snow machines and guns. This was also the time of residential schools where children were taken from families and sent to government run schools far away in places such as Churchill, Manitoba. Tuberculosis was still rampant and many individuals were sent south for long periods, some never to return. Families were torn apart and many left dependent and helpless without their primary providers or caregivers. It was during this time that families were relocated from Inukjuak to Resolute Bay by the federal government to assert Canadian sovereignty. The High Arctic Relocation is one of the most disgraceful events in Nunavik’s colonial history and stark example of how geo-politics was being played out by government at the expense of Inuit. It is important at this point to highlight how rapid this last round of intrusions into Nunavik was. As recalled by a Nunavik Inuit leader, “I was 10 years old before I ever even saw a white person”. 25 years later this same individual was jumping on and off airplanes traveling to corporate boardrooms negotiating a land claims agreement. Imagine the pace of change Inuit were enduring. Enter big business and the era of resource development. Events in the early 1970s galvanized Inuit and their Cree neighbours and the legal landscape of Nunavik was forever changed. In 1971 the Premier of Québec announced the “project of the century” – a massive hydroelectric development project for the La Grande River and its watershed. No one told the Inuit or Cree. Québec had targeted northern rivers as a new economic focus and Inuit were not contemplated in their plans. The Northern Québec Inuit Association, along with the Grand Council of the Crees of Québec filed for, and won, an injunction to stop the project. In an historic and courageous decision, Justice Malouf ruled in their favour. It was reversed six days later by the Québec Court of Appeal but paved the way for the negotiations of the James Bay and Northern Québec Agreement (JBNQA). The JBNQA, unlike more modern treaties, was a frantic, 2-year, out-of-court settlement. Work on the La Grande project had resumed. Dams, roads, flooding of vast reservoirs were all part of the plan. While the Inuit and Cree were negotiating, their lands were being destroyed. Governments also required that the Inuit and Cree surrender their aboriginal title, while at the same time confirming the rights of the Québec and Hydro-Québec to develop the region’s resources.
Recommended publications
  • Studien Zur Siedlungs- Und Wirtschaftsentwicklung in Der Östlichen Kanadischen Zentralarktis*)
    Studien zur Siedlungs- und Wirtschaftsentwicklung in der östlichen kanadischen Zentralarktis*) Von Erhard Treude (Münster/Westf.) Mit 5 Figuren Summary: On the Development 0/ the Settlement Pattern and the Economy 0/ the Ea8tern Ganadian Gentral Arctic. Two periods of development are dealt with: 1. 1920-1950:The whalers not havingreachedthe area, the Netsilik Eskimos did not come into elose contact with Euro-Canadians until after 1920 when the fur traders invaded the country. The introduction of the rifle and the gradual acceptance of fur trapping deeply affected the traditional economy, until it finally collapsed when the fox prices broke down after World War H. - 2. 1950-1970: This period is characterized bythe abandonment of the isolated winter settlements in favour of living in the larger communities of Gjoa Raven, Spence Bay and Pelly Bay providing a wide range of services and facilities. At the same time, opportunities for wage employment were offered on a wider scale. The formation of co-operatives on the one hand and settlement councils on the other hand enabled the local people to take a more active part in their economic and political development. - In a final chapter, the present (1971) structure of the settlement pattern and the economy are described; and data are provided on the total local cash income for each of the settlements. 1. Einleitung Unter Zentralarktis wird ein Bereich verstanden, der die Inseln Victoria, King William, Prince of Wales und Somerset sowie den festländischen Küstenstreifen etwa von Tinney Point im Westen bis Cape James Anderson im Osten umfaßt (vgl. Fig. 1). Nach der häufig benutzten, von der Richtung des Seeverkehrs bestimm- ten Zweiteilung des nördlichen Kanadas in West- und Ostarktis würde es sich um die östliche Westarktis zuzüglich der beiden zur Ostarktis gerechneten Inseln Prince of Wales und Somerset handeln.
    [Show full text]
  • AIP Canada Supplements Have Been Cancelled
    EFFECTIVE 0901Z 9 SEPTEMBER 2021 TO 0901Z 7 OCTOBER 2021 AIP CANADA Supplements Published by NAV CANADA in accordance with ICAO Annexes 4 and 15 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation © 2021 NAV CANADA All rights reserved Source of Charts and Maps: © 2021 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Department of Natural Resources NAV CANADA 09 SEP 21 AIP CANADA SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY 4a/21 (Supersedes all previous summaries) The following supplements are in effect: 40/16 Blasting Activity—Fort St. John, British Columbia 4/17 Blasting Activity—Fort St. John, British Columbia 5/17 Blasting Activity—Mackenzie, British Columbia 37/17 Multiple Cranes—Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta 11/18 Meteorological Tower—Arviat, Nunavut 24/18 Blasting Zone—Bloodvein, Manitoba (Replaces AIP Supplement 37/12) 26/18 Adjustment to the Canada Air Defence Identification Zone (Replaces AIC 2/18) 7/19 Quebec Region—Cranes for the Construction of the New Champlain Bridge—December 2018 – June 2019 (Replaces AIP Supplement 4/18) 22/19 Multiple Drilling Rigs—Conklin, Alberta 24/19 Multiple Drilling Rigs—Conklin, Alberta 25/19 Multiple Cranes—Scotford, Alberta 31/19 Multiple Drilling Rigs—Conklin, Alberta 59/19 Multiple Cranes—Winnipeg, Manitoba 67/19 Crane—Winnipeg, Manitoba 81/19 Blasting—Sacre-Coeur and Bergeronnes, Quebec 2/20 Multiple Cranes—Kelowna, British Columbia 23/20 Ontario Region—Laser Projection in the Vicinity of Egbert, Ontario—January 31, 2020 to January 31, 2025 (Replaces AIP Supplement 51/14) 41/20 Blasting—Baie-Comeau, Quebec 51/20 Mobile Crane—Edmonton,
    [Show full text]
  • La Belle Province: Same Ugly Story
    LA BELLE PROVINCE: SAME UGLY STORY A 12-Year Quantitative Analysis of Canada Economic Development for the Regions of Quebec June 2002 News Release -- French English CTF OTTAWA Suite 512 130 Albert Street Ottawa, ON K1P 5G4 Phone: 613-234-6554 Fax: 613-234-7748 Web: www.taxpayer.com ABOUT THE CTF The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) is a federally incorporated, non-profit, non-partisan, education and advocacy organization founded in Saskatchewan in 1990. It has grown to become Canada’s foremost taxpayer advocacy organization with more than 61,000 supporters nation-wide. The CTF’s three-fold mission statement is: • To act as a watchdog on government spending and to inform taxpayers of governments’ impact on their economic well-being; • To promote responsible fiscal and democratic reforms and to advocate the common interests of taxpayers; and • To mobilize taxpayers to exercise their democratic rights and responsibilities. The CTF maintains a federal and Ontario office in Ottawa and offices in the four provincial capitals of B.C., Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. In addition, the CTF recently opened its Centre for Aboriginal Policy Change in Victoria. Provincial offices conduct research and advocacy activities specific to their provinces in addition to acting as regional organizers of Canada-wide initiatives. The CTF’s official publication, The Taxpayer magazine, is published six times a year. CTF offices also send out weekly Let’s Talk Taxes commentaries to over 800 media outlets as well as providing media comment on current events. CTF staff and Board members are prohibited from holding memberships in any political party.
    [Show full text]
  • Policies and Guidelines: Nunavik Inuit Beneficiaries June 1, 2010
    Nunavik Enrolment Office P.O. Box 179 Kuujjuaq, Nunavik (Quebec) J0M 1C0 Telephone: (819) 964-2925 Fax: (819) 964-0458 www.makivik.org Enrolment Program for Nunavik Inuit Beneficiaries of the James Bay and Northern Québec Agreement PPOOLLIICCIIEESS AAnndd GGuuiiddeelliinneess June 1, 2010 Adopted by the Board of Directors of Makivik Corporation on October 5 - 8, 2010 Resolution No. ____________________ Modification made by the Board of Directors of Makivik Resolution No. Date (Attached hereto) Policies and Guidelines: Nunavik Inuit Beneficiaries June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENT SECTION I: INTRODUCTION: ENROLMENT OF THE INUIT BENEFICIARIES OF THE JAMES BAY AND NORTHERN QUEBEC AGREEMENT Page 4 1.1 Introduction Page 4 1.2 Background Page 4 1.3 Transfer from the Government of Quebec to the Nunavik Enrolment Office Page 5 1.4 Scope of New Eligibility Criteria and Enrolment Procedures Page 5 SECTION II: NUNAVIK ENROLMENT OFFICE AND INUIT BENEFICIARIES REGISTER Page 6 2.1 Head Office of the Nunavik Enrolment Office Page 6 2.2 Staffing for the Nunavik Enrolment Office Page 6 2.3 Nunavik Inuit Beneficiaries Register Page 6 2.4 Nunavik Inuit Beneficiary Card Page 6 SECTION III: RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE NUNAVIK ENROLMENT OFFICE Page 7 3.1 Overview of the Nunavik Enrolment Office Page 7 3.2 Statutory Functions of the Nunavik Enrolment Office Page 7 3.3 Ancillary Functions of the Nunavik Enrolment Office Page 7 SECTION IV: OVERVIEW: ENROLMENT OF NUNAVIK INUIT BENEFICIARIES OF THE JBNQA Page 10 4.1 Eligibility Criteria to be enrolled as Nunavik Inuit Beneficiary
    [Show full text]
  • Report NAMMCO 26Th Council Meeting, March 2018, Tromsø
    26TH MEETING OF COUNCIL REPORT 7 – 8 March 2018 © North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission NAMMCO Council Report 2018 Please cite this report as: NAMMCO-North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (2018) Report of the 26th Annual meeting of the NAMMCO Council. Available at www.nammco.no, https://nammco.no/topics/council-reports/ 2 NAMMCO Council Report 2018 REPORT OF THE 26th MEETING OF THE COUNCIL 7-8 March 2018, Tromsø, Norway 1. OPENING PROCEDURES 1.1. Welcome address The Chair of Council, Amalie Jessen (Greenland), welcomed all the participants (Appendix 1) to the 26th meeting of the Council of NAMMCO, and to the premises of the Secretariat. Jessen noted that NAMMCO had undergone a transition from a teen to an adult management organisation during its 26 years of existence. As Chair, she invited NAMMCO to look to the future and be more visionary in dealing with sound conservation and management of marine mammal resources. Being involved already in the predecessor to NAMMCO, the North Atlantic Committee (NAC) and having witnessed the signing of the 1992 agreement, she had the opportunity of observing NAMMCO evolving into a responsible regional management organisation. There will, however, always be room for improvements to make NAMMCO’s work more effective for the benefit of the marine resources and the people utilising marine mammals. She looked forward to the discussions the coming days and hoped for a constructive and visionary meeting. 1.2. Admission of observers On behalf of the Council, the Chair welcomed the attendance of observers (Appendix 1), noting representatives from Canada, Denmark, Japan, the Russian Federation, the International Whaling Commission (IWC), the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO), the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC), the South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisations, Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., the IWMC World Conservation Trust and Livelihoods International (LIVIN).
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Sediment and Stream Water OG SU Alberta Geological Survey (MITE) ICAL 95K 85J 95J 85K of 95I4674 85L
    Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Canada Canada CurrentCurrent and and Upcoming Upcoming NGR NGR Program Program Activities Activities in in British British Columbia, Columbia, NationalNational Geochemical Geochemical Reconnaissance Reconnaissance NorthwestNorthwest Territories, Territories, Yukon Yukon Territory Territory and and Alberta, Alberta, 2005-06 2005-06 ProgrProgrammeamme National National de de la la Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Géochimique Géochimique ActivitésActivités En-cours En-cours et et Futures Futures du du Programme Programme NRG NRG en en Colombie Colombie Britannique, Britannique, P.W.B.P.W.B. Friske, Friske,S.J.A.S.J.A. Day, Day, M.W. M.W. McCurdy McCurdy and and R.J. R.J. McNeil McNeil auau Territoires Territoires de du Nord-Ouest, Nord-Ouest, au au Territoire Territoire du du Yukon Yukon et et en en Alberta, Alberta, 2005-06 2005-06 GeologicalGeological Survey Survey of of Canada Canada 601601 Booth Booth St, St, Ottawa, Ottawa, ON ON 11 Area: Edéhzhie (Horn Plateau), NT 55 Area: Old Crow, YT H COLU Survey was conducted in conjunction with Survey was conducted in conjunction with and funded by IS M EUB IT B and funded by NTGO, INAC and NRCAN. NORTHWEST TERRITORIES R I the Yukon Geological Survey and NRCAN. Data will form A 124° 122° 120° 118° 116° B Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Data will form the basis of a mineral potential GEOSCIENCE 95N 85O the basis of a mineral potential evaluation as part of a 95O 85N evaluation as part of a larger required 95P 85M larger required Resource Assessment. OFFICE .Wrigley RESEARCH ANALYSIS INFORMATION Resource Assessment. .Wha Ti G 63° YUKON 63° Metals in the Environment (MITE) E Y AGS ESS Program: O E ESS Program: Metals in the Environment V .Rae-Edzo L R GSEOLOGICAL URVEY Survey Type: Stream Sediment and Stream Water OG SU Alberta Geological Survey (MITE) ICAL 95K 85J 95J 85K OF 95I4674 85L Survey Type: Stream Sediment, stream M Year of Collection: 2004 and 2005 A C K ENZI E R 2 62° I V water, bulk stream sediment (HMCs and KIMs).
    [Show full text]
  • Avataq Archaeology Field Report Cover AR270
    Tayara Site Geophysical Survey 2009 Sivulitta Inuusirilaurtangit Atuutilaurtanigill, CURA Project, Second Year Report presented to: Salluit Municipality, Salluit Land holding Corporation, Government of Nunavut, Department of Cultural Heritage, and to the Canadian Museum of Civilization Avataq Cultural Institute May 2010 AR 270 Tayara Site Geophysical Survey 2009 Sivulitta Inuusirilaurtangit Atuutilaurtanigill, CURA Project, Second Year Report presented to: Salluit Municipality, Salluit Land holding Corporation, Government of Nunavut, Department of Cultural Heritage, and to the Canadian Museum of Civilization May 2010 Archaeological Report number: AR 270 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ....................................................................................................1 List of Figures ..........................................................................................................2 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND TO THIS RESEARCH ..............................................................4 2009 FIELDWORK ..................................................................................................5 Previous Researches at Tayara Site .......................................................5 Fieldwork Methods.................................................................................9 Summary of Fieldwork Activities.........................................................10 Fieldwork Results ...................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Department Activity Report
    TRANSPORTATION department ACTIVITY REPORT MARCH 2020 TO MAY 2021 The Transportation department is responsible for the safe and secure management of 14 certified airports, 14 Marine Ports, the Usijit para-transport and public transit services, and the Off Highway Vehicle awareness program in Nunavik. Human Resources Hiring: Noah Jaaka, Coordinator, Operations and Maintenance, Kangiqsujuaq Malek Kalthoum, Coordinator, Infrastructure and Projects, Kuujjuaq Lissa Deveaux, Administrative Technician, Kuujjuaq Jose Pauyungie, Observer/Communicator Trainee, Akulivik Uttuqi Carrier, Observer/Communicator, Quaqtaq Robbie Ningiuruvik, Rotational Observer/Communicator, Nunavik Qirniulau Rockfort, Maintainer, Kuujjuaq Peter Annanack, Seasonal Maintainer, Kangiqsualujjuaq Elijah Etok, Seasonal Maintainer, Aupaluk Uqittuk Iyaituk, Seasonal Maintainer, Ivujivik Noah Qurnak, Seasonal Maintainer, Salluit Michel Boivin, Rotational Electrician, Nunavik William Taylor, Airport Response Specialist, Puvirnituq Training: Workplace Hazardous Material Information System (WHMIS) training tour started in March. Maintainers and Observer/Communicators from Inukjuak, Puvirnituq, Salluit, Kangiqsujuaq, Quaqtaq, Tasiujaq, and Kuujjuaq have been trained so far, as well as rotational mechanics and electricians. Every airport employee will be trained before the end of the summer. Heavy equipment training in winter conditions was given to Maintainers at Umiujaq and Akulivik airports in March. Airfield Movement Surface Condition Reporting (AMSCR) training
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Monitoring Indigenous Knowledge
    COASTAL MONITORING INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE HOLDERS MEETING REPORT Ottawa, Canada, February 29, 2016 Facilitated by the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) with funding provided by Polar Knowledge Canada. This is an independent report prepared by ICC and sponsored by Polar Knowl- edge Canada. All information within this report is the intellectual property of the Indigenous Knowledge holders. Photographers maintain all rights to the photos within this report. No photos may be duplicated or copied. Workshop organizers would like to thank the following organizations who con- tributed to travel for Indigenous Knowledge holders and other workshop related expenses – Inuit Circumpolar Council, Makivik Corporation, Nunavut Department of Fisheries and Sealing, Oceans North and Polar Knowledge Canada. COASTAL MONITORING INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE HOLDERS MEETING REPORT Hosted by Canada and facilitated by the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC). Ottawa, Canada, February 29, 2016. This is an independent report prepared by ICC and sponsored by Polar Knowledge Canada. All information within this report is the intellectual property of the Indigenous Knowledge holders attending the meeting. Photographers maintain all rights to the photos within this report. No photos may be duplicated or copied. Photo by Laura Thomson. Left to Right: Eva Krummel, Pitsey Moss-Davies, Stacey Fritz, Baba Pederson, Patrick Gruben, Carolina Behe, John Cheechoo, Qaiyaan Harcharek, Roy Ashen- felter, Quitsak Tarriasuk, Jimmy Johannes, Martha Flaherty, Cyrus Harris, Donald McLennan “We have been
    [Show full text]
  • CURRENT RESEARCH C Resources Natural Anada Geological Surveyofcanada C Naturelles Ressources Anada
    Geological Survey of Canada CURRENT RESEARCH 2006-G Geological Survey of Canada Radiocarbon Dates XXXV Collated by R. McNeely 2006 CURRENT RESEARCH Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Canada Canada ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2006 ISSN 1701-4387 Catalogue No. M44-2006/G0E-PDF ISBN 0-662-43811-6 A copy of this publication is also available for reference by depository libraries across Canada through access to the Depository Services Program's Web site at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca A free digital download of this publication is available from GeoPub: http://geopub.nrcan.gc.ca/index_e.php Toll-free (Canada and U.S.A.): 1-888-252-4301 Critical reviewers L. Dredge Author’s address R. McNeely Geological Survey of Canada Terrain Sciences Division 601 Booth Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8 Publication approved by GSC Northern Canada Original manuscript submitted: 2005-12-15 Final version approved for publication: 2006-01-10 Correction date: All requests for permission to reproduce this work, in whole or in part, for purposes of commercial use, resale, or redistribution shall be addressed to: Earth Sciences Sector Information Division, Room 402, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8. This date list, GSC XXXV, is the twenty-fourth to be published directly by the Geological Survey of Canada. Lists prior to GSC XII were published first in the journal Radiocarbon and were reprinted as GSC Papers. The lists through 1967 (GSC VI) were given new pagination, whereas lists VII to XI (1968 to 1971) were reprinted with the same pagination. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 2 Acknowledgments .
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Greenhouses: an Alternative Local Food Provisioning Strategy for Nunavik
    Northern Greenhouses: An Alternative Local Food Provisioning Strategy for Nunavik Thèse Ellen Avard Doctorat en sciences géographiques Philosophiae doctor (Ph.D.) Québec, Canada © Ellen Avard, 2015 Résumé Les serres nordiques: Une approche alternative à la sécurité alimentaire au Nunavik Les communautés inuites font face à des changements socioculturels et environnementaux rapides ainsi qu’à plusieurs défis concernant la sécurité alimentaire. Récemment, plusieurs projets innovateurs ont pris forme pour pallier aux coûts élevés et la qualité discutable des aliments frais dans le Nord. Cette recherche s’est déroulée au Nunavik (la région inuite de la province de Québec, Canada) et a été élaborée en utilisant une approche de recherche participative. L’objectif de ce travail était de documenter et de participer au développement d’un projet pilote de serre dans le village de Kuujjuaq dans le but de développer un modèle de sécurité alimentaire alternative pour le Nord. Plusieurs personnes ont, de prime abord, remis en question la viabilité à long terme d’un projet de serre dans une communauté inuite. Pourtant, les résultats de cette recherche démontrent qu’il y a de l’intérêt et du soutien de tous les secteurs pour ce type d’initiative. Les résultats démontrent également qu’une stratégie d’approvisionnement local basée sur la serriculture est techniquement faisable et socialement acceptable. La conclusion générale de cette recherche est que les serres nordiques ont le potentiel de devenir des éléments clés dans une nouvelle stratégie alimentaire nordique, une stratégie qui sera plus résiliente que celle que nous connaissons aujourd'hui, et qui va contribuer de manière durable à l’essor de la capacité communautaire et au développement socioéconomique des villages nordiques.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa (Ontario), June 13, 2017 /Press Release
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MP Romeo Saganash, Ryan McMahon, & over forty presentations taking place at the University of Ottawa June 15-17 during the national conference on "The Future of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Broadcasting" OTTAWA (ONTARIO), JUNE 13, 2017 /PRESS RELEASE/ – According to its Three-Year Plan ​ 2017-2020, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) will review the Native Broadcasting Policy (CRTC 1990-89) next year. The gatherings entitled "The Future of First Nations, Inuit and Métis Broadcasting" aim to bring practitioners, policy makers and academics together as allies to prepare a context for respectful and meaningful consultation. The national event in Ottawa will continue the conversation by sharing the outcomes from five regional events, over forty presentations, and keynote speeches by MP Romeo Saganash (Abitibi-Baie James-Nunavik-Eeyou) ​ ​ and Ryan McMahon (Makoons Media Group). ​ ​ Discussion Topics: The CRTC Process & CRTC Policy 1. How would you like the CRTC consultation process to be conducted? 2. How should the review process itself be changed? 3. What should the policy entail? 4. What are the elements to include or exclude? 5. What changes could be required to the 1991 Broadcasting Act to ensure the policy is upheld? ​ ​ See Native Radio Policy - CRTC Public Notice 1990-89 (http://crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/1990/PB90-89.htm) ​ ​ The national event will take place in Ottawa, Ontario, from June 15-17, 2017, in the Alex Trebek ​ ​ ​ Alumni Building (University of Ottawa, 157 Séraphin-Marion Private). Participants are invited to ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ register online at www.IndigenousRadio.ca. ​ ​ ​ Presenters in Ottawa will include: [in order of appearance] ​ ​ The Hon.
    [Show full text]