DOCSLIB.ORG

EPPO Reporting Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EPPO Reporting Service ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND ET MEDITERRANEENNE MEDITERRANEAN POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION EPPO Reporting Service NO. 1 PARIS, 2017-01 General 2017/001 EPPO Standards on efficacy evaluation of plant protection products: update of the web-based database Pests 2017/002 Eradication of Anoplophora glabripennis in Winterthur, Switzerland 2017/003 Eradication of Anoplophora glabripennis in St Georgen bei Obernberg, Austria 2017/004 First report of Anoplophora glabripennis in Montenegro 2017/005 Anoplophora glabripennis found in Ain department, France 2017/006 New outbreak of Anoplophora glabripennis in Bayern, Germany 2017/007 Updated situation of Anoplophora chinensis in Switzerland 2017/008 New outbreak of Anoplophora chinensis in Lombardia, Italy 2017/009 First report of Thrips setosus in the United Kingdom 2017/010 First report of Thrips setosus in France 2017/011 First report of Thrips setosus in Croatia 2017/012 First report of Thrips setosus in Germany 2017/013 Diabrotica virgifera virgifera no longer occurs in Belgium Diseases 2017/014 Detection and eradication of Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. poinsettiae in Germany 2017/015 Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. poinsettiae: addition to the EPPO Alert List 2017/016 First report of Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. oortii on Petunia in Poland and subsequent eradication 2017/017 Updated situation of Ralstonia solanacearum in the Netherlands 2017/018 Ralstonia solanacearum detected in Rosa in Poland 2017/019 Ralstonia solanacearum detected again on ware potatoes in Poland 2017/020 First report of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ on carrots in Israel 2017/021 First report of Phytophthora chrysanthemi in Germany Invasive plants 2017/022 First report of Salvinia molesta in the Canary Islands, Spain 2017/023 Solanum elaeagnifolium in Tunisia 2017/024 First report of Sporobolus neglectus in Hungary 2017/025 Distribution of invasive plants in urban environments in the Czech Republic 2017/026 LIFE project: Mitigating the threat of invasive alien plants in the EU through pest risk analysis to support the EU Regulation 1143/2014 2017/027 15th International Symposium on aquatic plants (Queenstown, NZ, 2018-02-18/23) 21 Bld Richard Lenoir Tel: 33 1 45 20 77 94 E-mail: [email protected] 75011 Paris Fax: 33 1 70 76 65 47 Web: www.eppo.int EPPO Reporting Service 2017 no. 1 - General 2017/001 EPPO Standards on efficacy evaluation of plant protection products: update of the web-based database The specific EPPO Standards for the efficacy evaluation of plant protection products (PP1) describe the conduct of trials carried out to assess the efficacy of plant protection products against specific pests. They are addressed to all institutions, official registration authorities, public institutes or private firms carrying out such trials. Since February 2009 the whole series of EPPO PP1 Standards (more than 290 Standards covering a wide range of crops and pests) is available in an online database in which Standards can be easily retrieved as PDF files by using a simple search tool. All general Standards (e.g. design, conduct, reporting and analysis of trials, phytotoxicity, effects on succeeding crops, analysis of resistance risk, minor uses) can be accessed free of charge. Access to specific Standards (e.g. aphids on potato, weeds in cereals) is provided for an annual fee. Subscriptions should be made directly online via the database. For more information on the contents of the database and subscriptions, please consult our web page: http://www.eppo.org/DATABASES/pp1/pp1.htm The database has been updated with the following new and revised standards adopted by EPPO Council in September 2016. Specific standards • PP 1/293(1) Nasonovia ribisnigri and other aphids on lettuce (new) • PP 1/294(1) Ceutorhynchus picitarsis (new) • PP 1/295(1) Helicoverpa armigera on vegetables and ornamentals (new) • PP 1/272(2) Foliar diseases on maize (revised) General Standards • PP 1/291(1) Evaluation of the influence of tank mix adjuvants on the efficacy of plant protection products (new) • PP 1/292(1) Cleaning pesticide application equipment (PAE) – efficacy aspects (new) Direct access to the database: http://pp1.eppo.int. In addition, 21 new extrapolation tables have been adopted to accompany EPPO Standard PP 1/257 Efficacy and crop safety extrapolations for minor uses. Extrapolation tables are available at: http://www.eppo.int/PPPRODUCTS/minor_uses/minor_uses.htm Source: EPPO Secretariat (2016-12). Additional key words: EPPO, publication 2 EPPO Reporting Service 2017 no. 1 – Pests 2017/002 Eradication of Anoplophora glabripennis in Winterthur, Switzerland In July 2012, Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae – EPPO A1 List) was found in Winterthur, canton of Zürich (EPPO RS 2013/049). Eradication measures were immediately implemented and included the destruction of infested and potentially infested trees, as well as intensive monitoring with sniffer dogs, tree climbers and visual inspections. Since 2013, no further signs of A. glabripennis activity have been detected (i.e. no beetles, larvae, eggs, exit holes, frass, oviposition and maturation feeding sites). In 2016-12-06, the NPPO of Switzerland officially declared the eradication of Anoplophora glabripennis in Winterthur. In addition, the NPPO of Switzerland informed the EPPO Secretariat of the current situation of A. glabripennis on other sites where official measures are still being implemented. It is noted that during surveys carried out in 2016, A. glabripennis was not found on these sites nor in any other parts of Switzerland. The pest status of Anoplophora glabripennis in Switzerland is officially declared as: Transient: only in some areas (Brünisried [notification: 2011-09-28], Marly [notification: 2014-08-13] and Berikon [notification: 2015-10-19]), under eradication. Source: NPPO of Switzerland (2016-12). Pictures: Anoplophora glabripennis. https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/ANOLGL/photos Additional key words: detailed record, eradication Computer codes: ANOLGL, CH 2017/003 Eradication of Anoplophora glabripennis in St Georgen bei Obernberg, Austria The NPPO of Austria recently informed the EPPO Secretariat that the isolated outbreak of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae – EPPO A1 List) found in 2012 in Geinberg near St Georgen bei Obernberg, Oberösterreich (EPPO RS 2013/163) has been successfully eradicated. In this demarcated area, intensive surveys have been carried out since September 2012 and no new infestations or living specimens have been found. The NPPO noted that as the infestation in Braunau-am-Inn was successfully eradicated in 2012 (EPPO RS 2013/163), only one demarcated area located in Gallspach (outbreak detected in November 2013) remains under eradication in Austria. Source: NPPO of Austria (2016-12). Pictures: Anoplophora glabripennis. https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/ANOLGL/photos Additional key words: detailed record, eradication Computer codes: ANOLGL, AT 2017/004 First report of Anoplophora glabripennis in Montenegro In Montenegro, Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae – EPPO A1 List) was found for the first time in 2015-10-26 in the municipality of Budva on a willow tree (Salix sp.). The origin of this outbreak is unknown. The infested tree was immediately destroyed and phytosanitary measures have been implemented. The situation of Anoplophora glabripennis in Montenegro can be described as follows: Transient, first found in 2015 in Budva, under eradication. 3 EPPO Reporting Service 2017 no. 1 – Pests Source: INTERNET Food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary sectors. Montenegro (in Montenegrin). News. http://www.vet.uprava.gov.me/vijesti/154904/Odbor-udruzenja-sumarstva-i-drvne- djelatnosti-upoznat-sa-novim-stetnim-organizmom.html http://www.vet.uprava.gov.me/vijesti/154120/Potvrda-prvog-nalaza-stetnog- organizma-Anoplophora-glabripennis-Motschulsky.html http://www.uip.gov.me/vijesti/154232/Nateritoriji-Opstine-Budva-pronaden-stetni- organizam-koji-izaziva-susenje-listopadnog-drveca.html Pictures: Anoplophora glabripennis. https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/ANOLGL/photos Additional key words: new record Computer codes: ANOLGL, ME 2017/005 Anoplophora glabripennis found in Ain department, France The NPPO of France recently informed the EPPO Secretariat of the first detection of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae – EPPO A1 List) in the department of Ain. On 2016-08-16, a beetle was found by a person on his/her terrace in the municipality of Divonne-les-Bains. The official authorities were informed on 2016-08-25, and signs of the presence of the insect were observed on 11 Acer trees on 2016-09-08. The identity of the pest was confirmed on 2016-09-14 by the French reference laboratory. All infested Acer trees were destroyed two days later by grinding and incineration. Training sessions for official and local stakeholders involved in pest management were organized. An information campaign was launched to raise public awareness, and a dedicated area for green waste was opened. The pest status of Anoplophora glabripennis in France is officially declared as: Transient, actionable, under eradication. Source: NPPO of France (2016-11). INTERNET Direction Régionale de l’Alimentation, de l’Agriculture et de la Forêt de la région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes. http://draaf.auvergne-rhone- alpes.agriculture.gouv.fr/capricornes-asiatiques Pictures: Anoplophora glabripennis. https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/ANOLGL/photos Additional key words: detailed record Computer codes: ANOLGL, FR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist Flora of the Former Carden Township, City of Kawartha Lakes, on 2016
    Hairy Beardtongue (Penstemon hirsutus) Checklist Flora of the Former Carden Township, City of Kawartha Lakes, ON 2016 Compiled by Dale Leadbeater and Anne Barbour © 2016 Leadbeater and Barbour All Rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or database, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, without written permission of the authors. Produced with financial assistance from The Couchiching Conservancy. The City of Kawartha Lakes Flora Project is sponsored by the Kawartha Field Naturalists based in Fenelon Falls, Ontario. In 2008, information about plants in CKL was scattered and scarce. At the urging of Michael Oldham, Biologist at the Natural Heritage Information Centre at the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Dale Leadbeater and Anne Barbour formed a committee with goals to: • Generate a list of species found in CKL and their distribution, vouchered by specimens to be housed at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, making them available for future study by the scientific community; • Improve understanding of natural heritage systems in the CKL; • Provide insight into changes in the local plant communities as a result of pressures from introduced species, climate change and population growth; and, • Publish the findings of the project . Over eight years, more than 200 volunteers and landowners collected almost 2000 voucher specimens, with the permission of landowners. Over 10,000 observations and literature records have been databased. The project has documented 150 new species of which 60 are introduced, 90 are native and one species that had never been reported in Ontario to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Spread of Sporobolus Neglectus and S. Vaginiflorus (Poaceae) in Slovenia and Neighbouring Countries
    41 (2): (2017) 249-256 Original Scientific Paper Spread of Sporobolus neglectus and S. vaginiflorus (Poaceae) in Slovenia and neighbouring countries Nejc Jogan Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana ABSTRACT: Systematic field sampling revealed that within 50 years since the first records in Slovenia, Sporobolus neglectus and S. vaginiflorus became widespread. They are two superficially similar N American annual grass species with cleistogamous spikelets and similar ecology that are confined to dry ruderal places in their European secondary range, especially along roads. The oldest records of naturalised populations of both species in Europe date back to the 1950s, when both were found for the first time in the Vipava valley (SW Slovenia). They spread slowly in the next decades to NE Italy, N Croatia, and S Austria until recently, when an explosive expansion has been observed along almost all the main roads in lowland and montane Slovenia. In addition to that, one or both of them have recently been recorded scattered in SE Europe (Hungary, Serbia, B&H, Montenegro) and W Europe (France, Switzerland). Sporobolus vaginiflorus is herein reported for the first time for Serbia, Herzegovina (in B&H), and Slavonia (in Croatia). Keywords: invasive species, neophytes, Sporobolus neglectus, Sporobolus vaginiflorus, road banks, Slovenia, Europe Received: 01 March 2017 Revision accepted: 02 August 2017 UDC: 582.542.11:574.91 (497.4) DOI: INTRODUCTION to warm temperate regions, of which 27 are native to N America (Peterson et al. 2003) and only Sporobolus Among naturalised neophytes, some inconspicuous pungens (Schreb.) Kunth. is native to Europe (Hansen grasses quite often remain neglected, especially if their 1980; Valdés & Scholz 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Biocontrol of Sporobolus Grasses
    Biocontrol of Sporobolus Grasses African survey for weedy sporobolus biocontrol agents Project number NBP.304 Report prepared for MLA by: Dr. W. A. Palmer Queensland Department of Natural Resources & Mines Meat & Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 North Sydney NSW 2059 ISBN 1 74036 508 9 March 2004 Natural Resources Biocontrol of Sporobolus Grasses TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................3 Methods .....................................................................................................................................................3 The Survey Area ........................................................................................................................................3 Identification of the Grasses .......................................................................................................................4 Collection of Specimens .............................................................................................................................5 Results .......................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION This Check List of the Plants of New Jersey Has Been
    INTRODUCTION This Check List of the Plants of New Jersey has been compiled by updating and integrating the catalogs prepared by such authors as Nathaniel Lord Britton (1881 and 1889), Witmer Stone (1911), and Norman Taylor (1915) with such other sources as recently-published local lists, field trip reports of the Torrey Botanical Society and the Philadelphia Botanical Club, the New Jersey Natural Heritage Program’s list of threatened and endangered plants, personal observations in the field and the herbarium, and observations by other competent field botanists. The Check List includes 2,758 species, a botanical diversity that is rather unexpected in a small state like New Jersey. Of these, 1,944 are plants that are (or were) native to the state - still a large number, and one that reflects New Jersey's habitat diversity. The balance are plants that have been introduced from other countries or from other parts of North America. The list could be lengthened by hundreds of species by including non-persistent garden escapes and obscure waifs and ballast plants, many of which have not been seen in New Jersey since the nineteenth century, but it would be misleading to do so. The Check List should include all the plants that are truly native to New Jersey, plus all the introduced species that are naturalized here or for which there are relatively recent records, as well as many introduced plants of very limited occurrence. But no claims are made for the absolute perfection of the list. Plant nomenclature is constantly being revised. Single old species may be split into several new species, or multiple old species may be combined into one.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration Sources
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture
    Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture Forest Service Donald L. Hazlett Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-130 June 2004 Hazlett, Donald L. 2004. Vascular plant species of the Comanche National Grassland in southeast- ern Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-130. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 36 p. Abstract This checklist has 785 species and 801 taxa (for taxa, the varieties and subspecies are included in the count) in 90 plant families. The most common plant families are the grasses (Poaceae) and the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Of this total, 513 taxa are definitely known to occur on the Comanche National Grassland. The remaining 288 taxa occur in nearby areas of southeastern Colorado and may be discovered on the Comanche National Grassland. The Author Dr. Donald L. Hazlett has worked as an ecologist, botanist, ethnobotanist, and teacher in Latin America and in Colorado. He has specialized in the flora of the eastern plains since 1985. His many years in Latin America prompted him to include Spanish common names in this report, names that are seldom reported in floristic pub- lications. He is also compiling plant folklore stories for Great Plains plants. Since Don is a native of Otero county, this project was of special interest. All Photos by the Author Cover: Purgatoire Canyon, Comanche National Grassland You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardening with New York City Native Plants
    Gardening with New York City Native Plants Smooth Rose Flowering dogwood City of New York Parks & Recreation Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor Adrian Benepe, Commissioner Bill Tai, Director, Natural Resources Group www.nyc.gov/parks Solomon’s seal Jack in the pulpit Violet Wild ginger Butterfly weed Columbine What is a native plant? Why go native in the garden? A native plant is one that naturally occurs in a region without having Sense of place: Why do yards and window boxes across the been introduced from elsewhere by people. New York City natives country hold the same impatiens, begonias and mums? Most of include mosses, ferns, grasses, sedges and rushes, wildflowers, trees, America’s favorite garden plants hail from places like Europe and Asia. shrubs, and vines. The New York area has its own regional flavor and distinct assemblage of native plants. We should seek out alternatives to hardware stores, Over thousands of years, native plants have adapted to the climate, corner delis and other outlets that offer “one size fits all”. The NYC soils, and environmental conditions of our area. They have developed Greenmarkets, with their emphasis on locally grown greenery, can the ability to thrive in our humid summers and freezing winters and to help you cultivate a sense of home by sowing local seeds. entice local insects, birds, and other animals to pollinate their flowers and disperse their fruits. Native plants are responsible for clean air, Ease of care: When installed in the appropriate habitat, native pure water, soil stability, flood abatement, and wild animal habitat. plants require less maintenance than the exotic alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • D: Rare Plants Species and Wildlife Habitats
    Appendix D – Rare Plant Species and Wildlife Habitats Rare Plant Species and Wildlife Habitats The habitat profiles created for the Wildlife Action Plan have been developed for the purpose of describing the full range of habitats that support New Hampshire’s wildlife species. However, these habitats can also serve as useful units for identifying rare plant habitats. This appendix provides lists of rare plant species known to be associated with each WAP habitat type. In accordance with the Native Plant Protection Act (NH RSA 217-A), the New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau (NHB) maintains a list of the state’s rarest and most imperiled plant species. This list has been developed in cooperation with researchers, conservation organizations, and knowledgeable amateur botanists. Plant locations have been obtained from sources including herbarium specimens, personal contacts, the scientific literature, and through extensive field research. The list is updated regularly to reflect changes in information. For each habitat, a list of associated rare plant species is presented. These rare plant – habitat associations are based on known occurrences of each species in New Hampshire. It is possible that an individual species will have different habitat associations elsewhere in its range. For more information on dominant and characteristic plant species for each habitat, refer to the individual habitat profiles. For each species, the following information is provided: Scientific name: The primary reference used is: Haines, Arthur. 2011. Flora Novae Angliae: A Manual for the Identification of Native and Naturalized Higher Vascular Plants of New England. Yale University Press. New Haven and London. Common name: Many plant species have more than one common name, and some common names are applied to multiple species.
    [Show full text]
  • Spread of Sporobolus Neglectus and S. Vaginiflorus (Poaceae) in Slovenia and Neighbouring Countries
    41 (2): (2017) 249-256 Original Scientific Paper Spread of Sporobolus neglectus and S. vaginiflorus (Poaceae) in Slovenia and neighbouring countries Nejc Jogan Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana ABSTRACT: Systematic field sampling revealed that within 50 years since the first records in Slovenia, Sporobolus neglectus and S. vaginiflorus became widespread. They are two superficially similar N American annual grass species with cleistogamous spikelets and similar ecology that are confined to dry ruderal places in their European secondary range, especially along roads. The oldest records of naturalised populations of both species in Europe date back to the 1950s, when both were found for the first time in the Vipava valley (SW Slovenia). They spread slowly in the next decades to NE Italy, N Croatia, and S Austria until recently, when an explosive expansion has been observed along almost all the main roads in lowland and montane Slovenia. In addition to that, one or both of them have recently been recorded scattered in SE Europe (Hungary, Serbia, B&H, Montenegro) and W Europe (France, Switzerland). Sporobolus vaginiflorus is herein reported for the first time for Serbia, Herzegovina (in B&H), and Slavonia (in Croatia). Keywords: invasive species, neophytes, Sporobolus neglectus, Sporobolus vaginiflorus, road banks, Slovenia, Europe Received: 01 March 2017 Revision accepted: 02 August 2017 UDC: 582.542.11:574.91 (497.4) DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1026555 INTRODUCTION to warm temperate regions, of which 27 are native to N America (Peterson et al. 2003) and only Sporobolus Among naturalised neophytes, some inconspicuous pungens (Schreb.) Kunth.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Vascular Plants
    NATURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES OF VIRGINIA: RARE PLANTS APRIL 2009 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION DIVISION OF NATURAL HERITAGE 217 GOVERNOR STREET, THIRD FLOOR RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 (804) 786-7951 List Compiled by: John F. Townsend Staff Botanist Cover illustrations (l. to r.) of Swamp Pink (Helonias bullata), dwarf burhead (Echinodorus tenellus), and small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) by Megan Rollins This report should be cited as: Townsend, John F. 2009. Natural Heritage Resources of Virginia: Rare Plants. Natural Heritage Technical Report 09-07. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report. April 2009. 62 pages plus appendices. INTRODUCTION The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation's Division of Natural Heritage (DCR-DNH) was established to protect Virginia's Natural Heritage Resources. These Resources are defined in the Virginia Natural Area Preserves Act of 1989 (Section 10.1-209 through 217, Code of Virginia), as the habitat of rare, threatened, and endangered plant and animal species; exemplary natural communities, habitats, and ecosystems; and other natural features of the Commonwealth. DCR-DNH is the state's only comprehensive program for conservation of our natural heritage and includes an intensive statewide biological inventory, field surveys, electronic and manual database management, environmental review capabilities, and natural area protection and stewardship. Through such a comprehensive operation, the Division identifies Natural Heritage Resources which are in need of conservation attention while creating an efficient means of evaluating the impacts of economic growth. To achieve this protection, DCR-DNH maintains lists of the most significant elements of our natural diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping of Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve Project Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Vegetation Classification and Mapping of Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve Project Report Natural Resource Report NRR/HTLN/NRR—2011/346 ON THE COVER Tallgrass prairie landscape at the Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve; view of stone school with wild rye (Elymus canadensis), wild alfalfa (Psoralidium tenuifolium), and blacksamson echinacea (Echinacea angustifolia) seedheads in the foreground. Photograph by: Kelly Kindscher USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve Vegetation Classification and Mapping of Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve Project Report Natural Resource Report NRR/HTLN/NRR—2011/346 Kelly Kindscher1* Hayley Kilroy1 Jennifer Delisle1 Quinn Long1 Hillary Loring1 Kevin Dobbs2 Jim Drake3 1Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory Kansas Biological Survey University of Kansas 2101 Constant Ave. Lawrence, KS 66047 2Kansas Applied Remote Sensing Program Kansas Biological Survey University of Kansas 2101 Constant Ave. Lawrence, KS 66047 3NatureServe P.O. Box 9354 St. Paul, MN 55109 *contact [email protected] April 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Seed Ecology of Native and Alien Plants of Open Uplands
    COMPARATIVE SEED ECOLOGY OF NATIVE AND ALIEN PLANTS OF OPEN UPLANDS Christopher Sean Blaney A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Graduate Department of Botany University of Toronto O Copyright by Christopher Sean Blaney 1999 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, nie Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K 1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de rnicrofiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othewise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. auton sation. COMPARATNE SEED ECOLOGY OF NATIVE AND ALIEN PLANTS OF OPEN UPLANDS Master of Science 1999 Chnstopher Sean Blaney Department of Botany University of Toronto Plant invaders may gain an advantage over natives because only enemy-free species are likely to invade (the predator filter hypothesis), or because invaders lose enemies while moving to a new area (the predator escape hypothesis).
    [Show full text]