DOCSLIB.ORG

AP Art History Unit Sheet #7: Chapter 7 Roman Art Mrs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AP Art History Unit Sheet #7: Chapter 7 Roman Art Mrs. Cook Works of Art Preview: The Roman Empire was the most expansive and powerful of the ancient world, and its cultural productions, architectural forms, social and legal structures, and language has indelibly marked the Western world as we know it today. The empire dates from 753, with the establishment of the city of Rome in Italy. The early monarchy gave rise to the Roman Republic, established in 509 BCE. The early Roman Empire dates to 27 BCE and the rule of Augustus, followed by the High Empire of 96‐192 CE. The Late Empire, 193‐337 CE, came to an end when Constantine, the first Christian emperor, moved the capital of the Empire from Rome to Constantinople. At its height, the Roman Empire spanned three continents, and its former territory is marked by monumental works of art, architecture, and engineering still visible today. Roman sculptors were avid followers of the Ancient Greeks, though they developed a distinctive realist style. Early Roman architecture blended forms from the Etruscans and the Greeks, but the Romans were above all architectural innovators, using concrete on a monumental scale, exploiting the structural possibilities of the arch, vault, and dome, and developing building types such as the basilica and amphitheater. Roman Art – Context Appropriation: “Captive Greece made Rome captive” Pragmatism: where the greatest good and popular opinion established the standard of art Propaganda: Power and Authority of Republicanism and Imperialism Utilitarianism: engineering, road building, public works to manage government and Empire Eclecticism: a tolerant and open‐minded approach to differences Engineering: new technological innovations in building including arch, vault, dome, concrete Technique/Terminology/Vocabulary: Architecture Doric order Ionic Order Corinthian Order Tuscan Order Arches: centering, springing, voussoirs, arcade, barrel vault, buttressing, travertine, opus caementicium, pozzolana Temples: pseudo‐peripteral, veneer, podium, porch, engage column, portico, coffers, oculus, dome, apse, spandrel, pilaster Baths: calidarium, tepidarium, frigidariu, amphitheater Forum: basilica, longitudinal axis, nave, clerestory, aisels, exedrae, cross vaulting, colonnade Sculpture: Patina, cuirass, antiquarium, death mask, portrait bust, veristic portraits, patrician, gravitas, equestrian portrait Painting the 4 styles of Roman wall painting, fresco, illusionism, modeling Mosaic various mosaics from Ostia, Pompeii, and Herculaneum Roman Architecture 1. Building for use – addressing the practical problems of everyday city life – a shift from religious buildings to civil engineering projects 2. Developing the arch and vault as a structural principle – increase in scale of building exterior and interiors made possible 3. Emphasis on verticality – made possible by the use if concrete – new height of buildings and multi‐used facilities 4. Design of significant interiors – greater variety and complexity of forms – Romans treated space and light as tangible realities 1 AP Art History Unit Sheet #7: Chapter 7 Roman Art Mrs. Cook Advantages of Concrete: 1. Less expensive (than stone) 2. Easier to build with (mixing) 3. Often stronger (tensile) 4. Larger structures can be built (especially height) 5. Greater variety & complexity of forms/spaces possible Religious Architecture: the temple Temple of Fortuna Virilis and Mason Carree: “abbreviated” temples – a blend of Etruscan and Greek prototypes Etruscan characteristics: high podium, access from front only (by stairway) and deep porch (portico) front Greek characteristics: use of classical orders (Ionic or Corinthian), pseudoperipteral (engage columns on side and back of temple) and stuccoed surface to approximate the white of Greek temples Function: temple not only houses cult statue but also used to display trophies and “spoils of war” (statues and weapons) Interior Space: central priority is the creation of unobstructed interior space at the expense of elaborate/costly exteriors Construction techniques: cella walls constructed in concrete then covered in stucco or marble veneer. Concrete also made possible more complex forms, including domes, apse, and vaulting (groin, barrel annular) Pantheon: a “revolution” in building: largest interior space in ancient world – a temple to all the gods (pantheon) • Fully realizing the potential of poured concrete – a masterwork of Roman engineering • Dramatic interior space expressed perfect geometric volumes – the “palpable presence of space itself” • Metaphorical implications: Roman engineering – the universality of the sphere connected by a perfect circular oculus to the cosmos beyond. Light plays an important role in this metaphor as the circle of light from the oculus traces the movement of the sun along the bronze coffered dome of the interior. Public Works: the forum, basilica, bath and amphitheater (also aqueducts/bridges/theaters) Forums: open courtyards surrounding by colonnades and an exedra on both sides, with a Roman temple at one end • A monument to their builders (individual emperors often trying to out‐do their predecessors) • A public meeting place as well as a place to conduct state business Forum of Trajan: an elaborate series of court yards organized along a central axis with the Basilica Ulpia. Greek and Latin Libraries, markets (in the adjacent exedra) and a temple to the deified rule himself. Basilicas: large rectangular two storied building on a gargantuan scale with apses at both ends (with a cult statue of the Emperor in one) and long colonnades on the interior surrounding the central space called a nave. Lit by clerestory window below a raised (flat or groin vaulted) roof with a coffered ceiling and flanked by two side areas called aisles. Baths: large complex of baths (frigidarium, tepidarium, and caldarium), as well as libraries, exercise rooms (palaestras), swimming pool, lecture halls and landscaped gardens built on a massive scale 2 AP Art History Unit Sheet #7: Chapter 7 Roman Art Mrs. Cook • Built with imperial funds by emperors to curry favor with the citizens of Rome and assert their importance. • Constructed with brick and marble‐faced concrete covering barrel, annular, and groin vaults and domes Amphitheaters: Colosseum: most dramatic example of amphitheaters built throughout the empire – site of gladiatorial combat and “hunting” of wild beast brought in from far‐reaches of empire. Held up to 50,000 people! • Engineering feat of colossal proportions – concrete construction faced with travertine, 80 entrance ways, radial concentric corridors of annular vaults, retractable roof of canvas and a sub structure below arena floor (which could be flooded for mock naval battles) for gladiators, sets, and animals. • Decoration on façade uses Greek orders superimposed around exterior arches using (from bottom to top) Doric, Ionic, Corinthian engaged columns with the top level Corinthian pilasters. Monuments: Altars, triumphal arches, commemorative columns Function: propaganda for the emperor (often military victories) Context: triumphal arches, columns and alters part of larger public works, often connected to forums or city streets Context: Triumphal arches, columns and alters part of larger public works, often connected to forums or city streets Content: Narrative reliefs depicting battle scenes or other historical events, featuring the emperor and armies/senators 3 .
Recommended publications
  • The Capital Sculpture of Wells Cathedral: Masons, Patrons and The

    The Capital Sculpture of Wells Cathedral: Masons, Patrons and The

    The Capital Sculpture of Wells Cathedral: Masons, Patrons and the Margins of English Gothic Architecture MATTHEW M. REEVE For Eric Fernie This paper considers the sculpted capitals in Wells cathedral. Although integral to the early Gothic fabric, they have hitherto eluded close examination as either a component of the building or as an important cycle of ecclesiastical imagery in their own right. Consideration of the archaeological evidence suggests that the capitals were introduced mid-way through the building campaigns and were likely the products of the cathedral’s masons rather than part of an original scheme for the cathedral as a whole. Possible sources for the images are considered. The distribution of the capitals in lay and clerical spaces of the cathedral leads to discussion of how the imagery might have been meaningful to diCerent audiences on either side of the choir screen. introduction THE capital sculpture of Wells Cathedral has the dubious honour of being one of the most frequently published but least studied image cycles in English medieval art. The capitals of the nave, transepts, and north porch of the early Gothic church are ornamented with a rich array of figural sculptures ranging from hybrid human-animals, dragons, and Old Testament prophets, to representations of the trades that inhabit stiC-leaf foliage, which were originally highlighted with paint (Figs 1, 2).1 The capitals sit upon a highly sophisticated pier design formed by a central cruciform support with triple shafts at each termination and in the angles, which oCered the possibility for a range of continuous and individual sculpted designs in the capitals above (Fig.
  • The Arch and Colonnade of the Manhattan Bridge Approach and the Proposed Designation of the Related Landmark Site (Item No

    The Arch and Colonnade of the Manhattan Bridge Approach and the Proposed Designation of the Related Landmark Site (Item No

    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 25, 1975, Number 3 LP-0899 THE ARCH AND COLONNAD E OF THE MANHATTAN BRIDGE APPROACH, Manhattan Bridge Plaza at Canal Street, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1912-15; architects Carr~re & Hastings. Landmark Site: Borough o£Manhattan Tax Map Block 290, Lot 1 in part consisting of the land on which the described improvement is situated. On September 23, 1975, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Arch and Colonnade of the Manhattan Bridge Approach and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No . 3). The hearing had been duly ad­ vertised in accordance with . the provisions of law. Two witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Manhattan Bridge Approach, a monumental gateway to the bridge, occupies a gently sloping elliptical plaza bounded by Canal, Forsyth and Bayard Streets and the Bowery. Originally designed to accommodate the flow of traffic, it employed traditional forms of arch and colonnade in a monument­ al Beaux-Arts style gateway. The triumphal arch was modeled after the 17th-century Porte St. Denis in Paris and the colonnade was inspired by Bernini's monumental colonnade enframing St. Peter's Square in Rome. Carr~re &Hastings, whose designs for monumental civic architecture include the New York Public Library and Grand Army Plaza, in Manhattan, were the architects of the approaches to the Manhattan Bridge and designed both its Brooklyn and Manhattan approaches. The design of the Manhattan Bridge , the the third bridge to cross the East River, aroused a good deal of controversy.
  • The Two-Piece Corinthian Capital and the Working Practice of Greek and Roman Masons

    The Two-Piece Corinthian Capital and the Working Practice of Greek and Roman Masons

    The two-piece Corinthian capital and the working practice of Greek and Roman masons Seth G. Bernard This paper is a first attempt to understand a particular feature of the Corinthian order: the fashioning of a single capital out of two separate blocks of stone (fig. 1).1 This is a detail of a detail, a single element of one of the most richly decorated of all Classical architec- tural orders. Indeed, the Corinthian order and the capitals in particular have been a mod- ern topic of interest since Palladio, which is to say, for a very long time. Already prior to the Second World War, Luigi Crema (1938) sug- gested the utility of the creation of a scholarly corpus of capitals in the Greco-Roman Mediter- ranean, and especially since the 1970s, the out- flow of scholarly articles and monographs on the subject has continued without pause. The basis for the majority of this work has beenformal criteria: discussion of the Corinthian capital has restedabove all onstyle and carving technique, on the mathematical proportional relationships of the capital’s design, and on analysis of the various carved components. Much of this work carries on the tradition of the Italian art critic Giovanni Morelli whereby a class of object may be reduced to an aggregation of details and elements of Fig. 1: A two-piece Corinthian capital. which, once collected and sorted, can help to de- Flavian period repairs to structures related to termine workshop attributions, regional varia- it on the west side of the Forum in Rome, tions,and ultimatelychronological progressions.2 second half of the first century CE (photo by author).
  • Vacuum Appropriation Strategies Between Patio and Pavilion Archetypes Hybridization in Two Classical Masters Works of Modern Architecture

    Vacuum Appropriation Strategies Between Patio and Pavilion Archetypes Hybridization in Two Classical Masters Works of Modern Architecture

    Athens Journal of Architecture - Volume 4, Issue 1– Pages 7-30 Vacuum Appropriation Strategies between Patio and Pavilion Archetypes Hybridization in Two Classical Masters Works of Modern Architecture By Simone Solinas Patio and pavilion, understood as archetypes, may appear as opposing principles in the construction of space. However, we can see through the analysis of some of the proposed cases that the overlap of these principles takes place very frequently, because they both arise from the need to delimit the vacuum by giving to it the character of space. The vacuum is not space, although space may be empty. The vacuum exists without us, whereas space does not. The architect, in designing enclosed space, encapsulates a portion of the vacuum, indistinct and formless, understood as Nature. This is a fragment of Paradise that everyone has right to possess, by binding an idea to the image of the patio and pavilion. From their combined use, there are several cases in which these elements take shape in architectural projects. In some projects, one principle dominates the other, but it is evident that there are a large variety of mixed proposals between the two extremes. The two principles do not exclude one another and can coexist together in a complementary way by appearing in the same project. The two figures as archetypes are taken as the main reference points of different poles that seem to be conflicting and irreconcilable ideas, but that instead build together the complexity of architecture. Full | empty, outside | inside, empty space | full-space, stereotomic | tectonic, vertical | horizontal, centrifugal | centripetal, works together to build space.
  • The Five Orders of Architecture

    The Five Orders of Architecture

    BY GìAGOMO F5ARe)ZZji OF 2o ^0 THE FIVE ORDERS OF AECHITECTURE BY GIACOMO BAROZZI OF TIGNOLA TRANSLATED BY TOMMASO JUGLARIS and WARREN LOCKE CorYRIGHT, 1889 GEHY CENTER UK^^i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/fiveordersofarchOOvign A SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF GIACOMO BAEOZZI OF TIGNOLA. Giacomo Barozzi was born on the 1st of October, 1507, in Vignola, near Modena, Italy. He was orphaned at an early age. His mother's family, seeing his talents, sent him to an art school in Bologna, where he distinguished himself in drawing and by the invention of a method of perspective. To perfect himself in his art he went to Eome, studying and measuring all the ancient monuments there. For this achievement he received the honors of the Academy of Architecture in Eome, then under the direction of Marcello Cervini, afterward Pope. In 1537 he went to France with Abbé Primaticcio, who was in the service of Francis I. Barozzi was presented to this magnificent monarch and received a commission to build a palace, which, however, on account of war, was not built. At this time he de- signed the plan and perspective of Fontainebleau castle, a room of which was decorated by Primaticcio. He also reproduced in metal, with his own hands, several antique statues. Called back to Bologna by Count Pepoli, president of St. Petronio, he was given charge of the construction of that cathedral until 1550. During this time he designed many GIACOMO BAROZZr OF VIGNOLA. 3 other buildings, among which we name the palace of Count Isolani in Minerbio, the porch and front of the custom house, and the completion of the locks of the canal to Bologna.
  • Federal Building United States Courthouse in Youngstown, Ohio, Was Designed and Constructed Under the U

    Federal Building United States Courthouse in Youngstown, Ohio, Was Designed and Constructed Under the U

    FEDERAL BUILDING UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE FEDERAL BUILDING UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE Youngstown, Ohio Youngstown, Ohio The Federal Building United States Courthouse in Youngstown, Ohio, was designed and constructed under the U.S. General Services Administration’s Design Excellence Program, an initiative to create and preserve a legacy of outstanding public buildings that will be used and enjoyed now and by future generations of Americans. Special thanks to the Honorable William T. Bodoh, Chief Bankruptcy Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, for his commitment and dedication to a building of outstanding quality that is a tribute to the role of the judiciary in our democratic society and worthy U.S. General Services Administration U.S. General Services Administration of the American people. Public Buildings Service Office of the Chief Architect Center for Design Excellence and the Arts October 2002 1800 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20405 202­501­1888 FEDERAL BUILDING UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE FEDERAL BUILDING UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE Youngstown, Ohio Youngstown, Ohio The Federal Building United States Courthouse in Youngstown, Ohio, was designed and constructed under the U.S. General Services Administration’s Design Excellence Program, an initiative to create and preserve a legacy of outstanding public buildings that will be used and enjoyed now and by future generations of Americans. Special thanks to the Honorable William T. Bodoh, Chief Bankruptcy Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, for his commitment and dedication to a building of outstanding quality that is a tribute to the role of the judiciary in our democratic society and worthy U.S.
  • The Burial of the Urban Poor in Italy in the Late Republic and Early Empire

    The Burial of the Urban Poor in Italy in the Late Republic and Early Empire

    Death, disposal and the destitute: The burial of the urban poor in Italy in the late Republic and early Empire Emma-Jayne Graham Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology University of Sheffield December 2004 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk The following have been excluded from this digital copy at the request of the university: Fig 12 on page 24 Fig 16 on page 61 Fig 24 on page 162 Fig 25 on page 163 Fig 26 on page 164 Fig 28 on page 168 Fig 30on page 170 Fig 31 on page 173 Abstract Recent studies of Roman funerary practices have demonstrated that these activities were a vital component of urban social and religious processes. These investigations have, however, largely privileged the importance of these activities to the upper levels of society. Attempts to examine the responses of the lower classes to death, and its consequent demands for disposal and commemoration, have focused on the activities of freedmen and slaves anxious to establish or maintain their social position. The free poor, living on the edge of subsistence, are often disregarded and believed to have been unceremoniously discarded within anonymous mass graves (puticuli) such as those discovered at Rome by Lanciani in the late nineteenth century. This thesis re-examines the archaeological and historical evidence for the funerary practices of the urban poor in Italy within their appropriate social, legal and religious context. The thesis attempts to demonstrate that the desire for commemoration and the need to provide legitimate burial were strong at all social levels and linked to several factors common to all social strata.
  • Architecture, Power, and National Identity

    Architecture, Power, and National Identity

    Architecture, Power, and National Identity Second edition This new, expanded edition of Architecture, Power, and National Identity examines how architecture and urban design have been manipulated in the service of politics. Focusing on the desigq .?fparliamentary complexes in capital cities across the world, it shows how these places reveal the struggles for power and identity in multicultural natiortstates. Building on the prize-winning first edition, Vale updates the text and illustrations to account for recent sociopolitical changes, inciudesdisCl.lssion of several newly built places, and assesses the enhanced concerns for security that have preoccupied regimes in politically volatile countries. Th~ book is truly glob<l;l in scope, looking at capital cities in North America and Europe, as well as in India, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Kuwait, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Tanzania, Papua New Guinea, and Australia. Ultimately, Vale presents an engaging, incisive combination of history, politics, and architecture to chart the evolution of state power and national identity, updated for the twenty-first century. Lawrence Vale is the Head of the Department of Urban Studies and Planning at MIT. He has published six previous books, including the first edition of Architecture, Power, and National Identity, which received the Spiro Kostof Award from the Society of Architectural Historians. Praise for the first edition: "Lawrence Vale's Architecture, Power, and National Identity is a powerful and compelling work and is a major contribution to the history of urban form." David Gosling, Town Planning Review "[Vale's] book makes fascinating reading for anyone interested in the cultural forces behind architecture and urban design and in the ways that parliamentary and other major government buildings are emblematic of the political history and power elites of their countries.
  • COLONNADE RENOVATION Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia

    COLONNADE RENOVATION Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia

    CSI Richmond – April Project Spotlight - Glavé & Holmes Architecture COLONNADE RENOVATION Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia Washington and Lee University’s front campus was designated a National Historic District in 1973, described by the Interior as “one of the most dignified and beautiful college campuses in the nation”. In the center stands the Colonnade, comprised of the five most iconic buildings in the historic district: Washington, Payne, Robinson, Newcomb, and Tucker Halls. The phased rehabilitation of the building spanned eight years. The Colonnade is deeply revered, making any change sensitive. However, restoring its vitality was paramount to the University: code deficiencies, inefficient infrastructure, and worn interiors reflected decades of use. Offices were inadequate, spaces for interaction were sparse, technology was an afterthought, and there weren’t even bathrooms on the third floors. Understanding the beloved nature of the buildings, the University established lofty goals for this undertaking. G&HA followed the guidelines from the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation to preserve the major character and defining features in each building while upgrading all the MEP and life safety systems throughout. Because of space constraints, a new utility structure was designed and located across Stemmons Plaza to sit below grade. The structure’s green roof and seating areas integrate it into the site and enhance the landscape. The project achieved LEED Silver and historic tax credits. — COLONNADE
  • The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance

    The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance

    •••••••• ••• •• • .. • ••••---• • • - • • ••••••• •• ••••••••• • •• ••• ••• •• • •••• .... ••• .. .. • .. •• • • .. ••••••••••••••• .. eo__,_.. _ ••,., .... • • •••••• ..... •••••• .. ••••• •-.• . PETER MlJRRAY . 0 • •-•• • • • •• • • • • • •• 0 ., • • • ...... ... • • , .,.._, • • , - _,._•- •• • •OH • • • u • o H ·o ,o ,.,,,. • . , ........,__ I- .,- --, - Bo&ton Public ~ BoeMft; MA 02111 The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance ... ... .. \ .- "' ~ - .· .., , #!ft . l . ,."- , .• ~ I' .; ... ..__ \ ... : ,. , ' l '~,, , . \ f I • ' L , , I ,, ~ ', • • L • '. • , I - I 11 •. -... \' I • ' j I • , • t l ' ·n I ' ' . • • \• \\i• _I >-. ' • - - . -, - •• ·- .J .. '- - ... ¥4 "- '"' I Pcrc1·'· , . The co11I 1~, bv, Glacou10 t l t.:• lla l'on.1 ,111d 1 ll01nc\ S t 1, XX \)O l)on1c111c. o Ponrnna. • The Architecture of the Italian Renaissance New Revised Edition Peter Murray 202 illustrations Schocken Books · New York • For M.D. H~ Teacher and Prie11d For the seamd edillo11 .I ltrwe f(!U,riucu cerurir, passtJgts-,wwbly thOS<' on St Ptter's awl 011 Pnlladfo~ clmrdses---mul I lr,rvl' takeu rhe t>pportrmil)' to itJcorporate m'1U)1 corrt·ctfons suggeSLed to nu.• byfriet1ds mu! re11iewers. T'he publishers lwvc allowed mr to ddd several nt•w illusrra,fons, and I slumld like 10 rltank .1\ Ir A,firlwd I Vlu,.e/trJOr h,'s /Jelp wft/J rhe~e. 711f 1,pporrrm,ty /t,,s 11/so bee,r ft1ke,; Jo rrv,se rhe Biblfogmpl,y. Fc>r t/Jis third edUfor, many r,l(lre s1m1II cluu~J!eS lwvi: been m"de a,,_d the Biblio,~raphy has (IJICt more hN!tl extet1si11ely revised dtul brought up to date berause there has l,een mt e,wrmc>uJ incretlJl' ;,, i111eres1 in lt.1lim, ,1rrhi1ea1JrP sittr<• 1963,. wlte-,r 11,is book was firs, publi$hed. It sh<>uld be 110/NI that I haw consistc11tl)' used t/1cj<>rm, 1./251JO and 1./25-30 to 111e,w,.firs1, 'at some poiHI betwt.·en 1-125 nnd 1430', .md, .stamd, 'begi,miug ilJ 1425 and rnding in 14.10'.
  • Renaissance Gardens of Italy

    Renaissance Gardens of Italy

    Renaissance Gardens of Italy By Daniel Rosenberg Trip undertaken 01-14 August 2018 1 Contents: Page: Introduction and overview 3 Itinerary 4-5 Villa Adriana 6-8 Villa D’Este 9-19 Vatican 20-24 Villa Aldobrindini 25-31 Palazzo Farnese 32-36 Villa Lante 37-42 Villa Medici 43-45 Villa della Petraia 46-48 Boboli Gardens 49-51 Botanical Gardens Florence 52 Isola Bella 53-57 Isola Madre 58-60 Botanic Alpine Garden Schynige Platte (Switz.) 61-62 Botanic Gardens Villa Taranto 63-65 Future Plans 66 Final Budget Breakdown 66 Acknowledgments 66 Bibliography 66 2 Introduction and Overview of project I am currently employed as a Botanical Horticulturalist at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. I started my horticultural career later in life and following some volunteer work in historic gardens and completing my RHS level 2 Diploma, I was fortunate enough to secure a place on the Historic and Botanic Garden training scheme. I spent a year at Kensington Palace Gardens as part of the scheme. Following this I attended the Kew Specialist Certificate in Ornamental Horticulture which gave me the opportunity to deepen my plant knowledge and develop my interest in working in historic gardens. While on the course I was able to attend a series of lectures in garden history. My interest was drawn to the renaissance gardens of Italy, which have had a significant influence on European garden design and in particular on English Gardens. It seems significant that in order to understand many of the most important historic gardens in the UK one must understand the design principles and forms, and the classical references and structures of the Italian renaissance.
  • Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, C.319–50 BC

    Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, C.319–50 BC

    Ex senatu eiecti sunt: Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, c.319–50 BC Lee Christopher MOORE University College London (UCL) PhD, 2013 1 Declaration I, Lee Christopher MOORE, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Thesis abstract One of the major duties performed by the censors of the Roman Republic was that of the lectio senatus, the enrolment of the Senate. As part of this process they were able to expel from that body anyone whom they deemed unequal to the honour of continued membership. Those expelled were termed ‘praeteriti’. While various aspects of this important and at-times controversial process have attracted scholarly attention, a detailed survey has never been attempted. The work is divided into two major parts. Part I comprises four chapters relating to various aspects of the lectio. Chapter 1 sees a close analysis of the term ‘praeteritus’, shedding fresh light on senatorial demographics and turnover – primarily a demonstration of the correctness of the (minority) view that as early as the third century the quaestorship conveyed automatic membership of the Senate to those who held it. It was not a Sullan innovation. In Ch.2 we calculate that during the period under investigation, c.350 members were expelled. When factoring for life expectancy, this translates to a significant mean lifetime risk of expulsion: c.10%. Also, that mean risk was front-loaded, with praetorians and consulars significantly less likely to be expelled than subpraetorian members.