Federal Aviation Agency

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Aviation Agency FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 • NUMBER 120 Wednesday, June 23, 1965 • Washington, D.C. Pages 8027-8088 Agencies in this issue-— Agriculture Department -r Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Internal Revenue Service Interstate Commerce Commission Post Office Department Small Business Administration Veterans Administration Weather Bureau Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Latest Edition Guide to Record Retention Requirements [Revised as of January 1, 1965] This useful reference tool is designed keep them, and (3) how long they to keep industry and the general must be kept. Each digest also public informed concerning published includes a reference to the full text requirements in laws and regulations of the basic law or regulation govern­ relating to records-retention. It con­ ing such retention. tains about 900 digests detailing the retention periods for the many types of records required to be kept under The booklet’s index, numbering over Federal laws and rules. 2,000 items, lists for ready reference the categories of persons, companies, The “Guide” tells the user (1) what and products affected by Federal records must be kept, (2) who must record-retention requirements. Price: 40 cents Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402 / * m \ Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, M°n 7 ■ ^ on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, ^ FEDERAL^pEGISTER Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address tbe Area Code 202 V , »34 Phone 963—3261 <«WT£0’ Archives Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority ^°^tal.^® Arfjnin. Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed . +endeI1t istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the supe of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. navable to The F ederal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, p y money advance. The charge for individual copies (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to the size of the issue. Remit cnec order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. titles, pur- The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code op F ederal Regulations, which is published, UI~ eiLerintendent oi suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code op Federal Regulations is sold by the sup Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal Register issue of each month. regulations. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister or the Code op Feder Contents agriculture departm ent Control zone; alteration________ 8036 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Control zones and transition See also Consumer and Marketing areas: Rules and Regulations Service. Alteration, designations, and Prohibited trade practices: Notices revocation________________ 8035 Alaskan Fur Co., Inc., et al___ 8042 Nebraska; designation and exten­ Alterations and designation___ 8036 Cyn Les Sportswear, Inc., et aJ_ 8043 sion of areas for emergency Designation.___________ 8036 Nancy Greer, Inc___________ 8043 loans______________________ 8071 Control zone, transition areas, and control area extension; altera­ INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION tion, revocation, and designa­ tion_______________________ 8035 Rules and Regulations Notices Federal aid to airports; miscel­ Income taxes: Philadelphia Electric Co.; exten­ laneous amendments.———__ 8037 Dividends received; deduction sion of completion date___:___ 8071 Transition areas: for certain dividends paid by Alteration and designation____ 8037 foreign corporations___ ____ 8044 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Designations (2 documents)__, 8037 Tax adjustments in determining earnings and profits of cer­ Proposed Rule Making Proposed Rule Making tain foreign corporations___ 8044 Foreign air carrier permits au­ Airworthiness directive; Boeing thorizing charter transportation Models 707 and 720 Series air­ INTERSTATE COMMERCE only; terms, conditions, and lim­ craft ___ ______________i_____ 8062 itations ________ _____ _____ 8062 COMMISSION Notices FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Notices IATA traffic conference; agree­ COMMISSION Finance applications_______ 8086 ment regarding specific com­ Rules and Regulations Fourth section applications for re­ modity rates_______■___ ____ 8071 lief (2 documents)_______ 8085, 8086 Table of assignment, FM broad­ Motor carrier: CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION cast stations _________ ___ 8048 Alternate route deviation no­ Proposed Rule Making tices ______ ___ ;_____,____ 8082 Notices Table of assignments, FM broad­ Applications and certain other Executive Director, District of cast stations (2 documents)___ 8067 proceedings__ ________ 8083 Columbia Redevelopment Land Intrastate applications__ ____ 8085 Agency; manpower shortage__ Ô071 Notices Hearings, etc.: POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT COMMERCE DEPARTMENT American Telephone and Tele­ Rules and Regulations See Weather Bureau. graph Co------T____________ 8071 Beard, Sam H., and Southeast­ What may be mailed at second CONSUMER AND MARKETING ern Broadcasting Co:, Inc. class rates; supplements._____ 8048 (WKLF-FM) ____ 8072 Proposed Rule Making SERVICE Clay County Broadcasting Co. Supplements to publications with Rules and Regulations and Wilderness Road Broad­ second class mailing privileges. 8049 Grain standards; change in agen­ casting Co________ ;___ __ 8072 cy name__________________ 8031 Downriver Broadcasting Assn_ 8073 SMALL BUSINESS Hay and straw standards, and in­ Kent-Sussex Broadcasting Co_ 8073 spection and certification; Symphony Network Association, ADMINISTRATION change of agency name_______ 8031 Inc., and Chapman Radio and Notices Limes grown in Florida; expenses Television Co_________ 8073 Delegations of authority to con­ and rate of assessment__ ____ 8031 duct program activities in cer- Peaches, Elberta; grades and FEDERAL MARITIME tajn areas: sizes______________ 8031 COMMISSION Middle Atlantic_____________ 8080 Proposed Rule Making Notices Pacific Coastal______________ 8080 Cotton, American upland; with­ Rocky Mountain______ 8080 Board of Port Commissioners of Southeastern_______________ 8080 drawal of proposal__________ 8049 City of Oakland et al.; agree­ MUk in certain marketing areas: Disaster area declarations: ment filed for approval_______ 8073 Kansas____ ________________ 8081 Great Basin; suspension of pro­ Free time and demurrage prac­ vision______________ Missouri_______________ 4i__ 8082 8049 tices on inbound cargo at New Texas (2 documents)___ _ 8081,8082 Rio Grande Valley; decision__ 8050 York harbor; hearing____ ___ 8074 Seatrain Lines, Inc., and Puerto federal a v ia t io n a g e n c y Rican Forwarding Co., Inc.; TREASURY DEPARTMENT Rules and Regulations hearing____________________ 8074 See Internal Revenue Service. Airworthiness certificates; effec­ tiveness---------------------------- 8032 FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION VETERANS ADMINISTRATION ^worthiness directives : Notices Rules and Regulations Boeing Models 707 and 720 Se- Hearings, etc.: Life insurance, U.S. government nes aircraft™ ____ _ 8033 Consolidated Gas Supply Corp. and national service; miscel­ Lockheed Models 1049C, D, E, G, and United Fuel Gas Co___ 8079 laneous amendments________ 8047 and H Series aircraft______ _ 8033 Florida Gas Transmission Co_ 8078 joining Models TXVO and Kewanee Oil Co. et al_____ _ 8074 WEATHER BUREAU VO-540 Series engines. _____ 8034 Natural Gas Pipeline Company a r,v® 1-Schebler carburetors, of America___________ .___ 8079 Rules and Regulations certain models________ ___ 8034 South Georgia Natural Gas Co_ 8079 Charges for services— ____.___ 8042 8029 8030 CONTENTS List of CFR Parts Affected (Codification Guide) The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1965, and specifies how they are affected. 7 CFR P roposed R ules: 26 CFR 26__ 8031 39___ ________ 8062 1 (2 documents)______________ 8044 57__________:_______ !_________ 8031 214___ 8062 68__1_____ „___ 8031 15 CFR 38 CFR 911__________________________ 8031 6------ ------------ -------------------__ 8047 917____ _____ ___——__ --1-1,1- 8031 503_______________________ ;__ 8042 8_____ ________ —....................... 8047 P roposed R ules: 28_____ 8049 16 CFR 39 CFR 1136_______ 8049 13 (3 documents) ________ 8042,8043 22....... 8048 1138—_,__ •_____ ___ 8050 P roposed R ules: 14 CFR 22_______ 8049 21________________________ ___._ 8032 47 CFR 39 (4 documents)____ _____ 8033, 8034 71 (8 documents) _____ 8035-8037 73_________ 8048 91__ 8032 P roposed R ules: 151__ 8037
Recommended publications
  • Groton-New London Airport (GON)
    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Groton-New London Airport (GON) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 June 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Groton‐New London Airport (GON) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 6/9/17 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 9 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR WATERBURY-OXFORD AIRPORT ................................................. 15 4.1 SWOT Components ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Deprivation Rule and the Pari Passu Rule in Insolvency
    The Anti-deprivation Rule and the Pari Passu Rule in Insolvency Peter Niven* In 2011 the UK Supreme Court delivered a judgment in Belmont Park Investments Pty v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd that addressed the common law anti-deprivation rule. The anti-deprivation rule is a rule that is aimed at attempts to withdraw an asset on bankruptcy, with the effect that the bankrupt’s estate is reduced in value to the detriment of creditors. The underlying public policy is that parties should not be able to contract to defeat the insolvency laws. The Supreme Court in Belmont recognised, for the first time, that there are two distinct rules arising from that public policy, the anti-deprivation rule and the pari passu rule. The latter rule provides that parties cannot contract out of the statutory provisions for pari passu distribu- tion in bankruptcy. The Supreme Court’s judgment has been applied in a number of cases in the UK.This article examines Belmont and its application in two subsequent cases. 0There is a general principle of public policy that parties cannot contract out of the legislation governing insolvency. From this general principle two sub-rules have emerged: the anti-deprivation rule and the rule that it is contrary to public policy to contract out of pari passu distribution (the pari passu rule). The anti-deprivation rule is a rule of the common law that is aimed at attempts to withdraw an asset on bankruptcy, with the effect that the bankrupt’s estate is reduced in value to the detriment of creditors.
    [Show full text]
  • AAAE Delivers for Airport Executives
    AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES MEDIAKIT 1 Industry Friends and Colleagues: As we prepare for 2010, Airport Magazine is developing articles that will address industry concerns about the nation’s economic recovery; share lessons learned from the recession and the price of fuel and its impact on air service; provide timely information on regulatory and legislative issues; fulfill the far-ranging needs of airports for training information; describe the lessons airports have learned on subjects that include ARFF, technology and airfield and terminal improvements; and much more. Every feature and department in Airport Magazine is designed to deliver relevant, timely and insightful information to our readers. We have crafted our 2010 editorial calendar with these goals in mind. The 2010 lineup combines familiar topics — such as baggage screening, concessions and winter operations — with emerging ones that include NextGen and green airports. Our format will be as varied as our selection of articles: we’ll have roundtables with industry experts; articles written by airport officials; interviews with government and industry officials; and photo features to highlight aspects of our industry. Our ambitious plans for 2010 would not be possible, however, without the faithful support of Airport Magazine’s advertisers. For more than 20 years, companies that advertise to the airport community have trusted Airport Magazine to deliver their message to this audience. For potential advertisers, please consider this: by choosing our magazine to communicate your message, you are supporting not just an advertiser-funded magazine, but an entire association — the American Association of Airport Executives. All of us at Airport Magazine look forward to working with you in 2010 and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Neil Cloughley, Managing Director, Faradair Aerospace
    Introduction to Faradair® Linking cities via Hybrid flight ® faradair Neil Cloughley Founder & Managing Director Faradair Aerospace Limited • In the next 15 years it is forecast that 60% of the Worlds population will ® live in cities • Land based transportation networks are already at capacity with rising prices • The next transportation revolution faradair will operate in the skies – it has to! However THREE problems MUST be solved to enable this market; • Noise • Cost of Operations • Emissions But don’t we have aircraft already? A2B Airways, AB Airlines, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen London Express, ACE Freighters, ACE Scotland, Air 2000, Air Anglia, Air Atlanta Europe, Air Belfast, Air Bridge Carriers, Air Bristol, Air Caledonian, Air Cavrel, Air Charter, Air Commerce, Air Commuter, Air Contractors, Air Condor, Air Contractors, Air Cordial, Air Couriers, Air Ecosse, Air Enterprises, Air Europe, Air Europe Express, Air Faisal, Air Ferry, Air Foyle HeavyLift, Air Freight, Air Gregory, Air International (airlines) Air Kent, Air Kilroe, Air Kruise, Air Links, Air Luton, Air Manchester, Air Safaris, Air Sarnia, Air Scandic, Air Scotland, Air Southwest, Air Sylhet, Air Transport Charter, AirUK, Air UK Leisure, Air Ulster, Air Wales, Aircraft Transport and Travel, Airflight, Airspan Travel, Airtours, Airfreight Express, Airways International, Airwork Limited, Airworld Alderney, Air Ferries, Alidair, All Cargo, All Leisure, Allied Airways, Alpha One Airways, Ambassador Airways, Amber Airways, Amberair, Anglo Cargo, Aquila Airways,
    [Show full text]
  • BDL Brochure.Pdf
    The Connecticut Airport Authority The Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) was established as a quasi-public agency in 2011 to own, improve, and operate Bradley International Airport and the five state-owned general aviation airports (Danielson, Groton-New London, Hartford-Brainard, Waterbury-Oxford, and Windham). The CAA strives to provide excellent customer service and top-quality facilities for its passengers while making Connecticut’s airports more attractive to new airlines, establishing new routes, and supporting Connecticut’s overall economic development and growth strategy. The CAA’s five general aviation airports are also crucial components of the state’s overall transportation system, providing access to corporate aircraft, local pilots, and convenient charter service for regional businesses. Already, the CAA has achieved numerous milestones, including the addition of new Bradley service to Dublin (Ireland), Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Fort Myers, Houston, Tampa and Washington, D.C. The Airports: Bradley International Airport Bradley International Airport (BDL) is a civil/military airport in Windsor Locks, Connecticut. Owned and operated by the Connecticut Airport Authority, it is the second-largest airport in New England. The airport is about halfway between Hartford and Springfield. It is Connecticut's busiest commercial airport with 93,461 operations for the calendar year ending 2015 and enplanements of 1,465,147 as of June, 2016. Airlines operating at Bradley International Airport include Aer Lingus, Air Canada, American Airlines, Delta, JetBlue, OneJet, Southwest, and United. As a dual-use military facility with the U.S. Air Force, the airport is also home to the 103rd Airlift Wing (103 AW) of the Connecticut Air National Guard.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography AIR FRANCE Carlier, c., ed. 'La construction aeronautique, Ie transport aenen, a I'aube du XXIeme siecle'. Centre d'Histoire de l'Industrie Aeronautique et Spatiale, Uni­ versity of Paris I, 1989. Chadeau, E., ed. 'Histoire de I'aviation civile'. Vincennes, Comite Latecoere and Service Historique de l'Annee de l'Air, 1994. Chadeau, E., ed. 'Airbus, un succes industriel europeen'. Paris, Institut d'Histoire de l'Industrie, 1995. Chadeau, E. 'Le reve et la puissance, I'avion et son siecle'. Paris, Fayard, 1996. Dacharry, M. 'Geographie du transport aerien'. Paris, LITEC, 1981. Esperou, R. 'Histoire d'Air France'. La Guerche, Editions Ouest France, 1986. Funel, P., ed. 'Le transport aerien fran~ais'. Paris, Documentation fran~aise, 1982. Guarino, J-G. 'La politique economique des entreprises de transport aerien, Ie cas Air France, environnement et choix'. Doctoral thesis, Nice University, 1977. Hamelin, P., ed. 'Transports 1993, professions en devenir, enjeux et dereglementation'. Paris, Ecole nationale des Ponts et Chaussees, 1992. Le Due, M., ed. 'Services publics de reseau et Europe'. Paris, Documentation fran­ ~ise, 1995. Maoui, G., Neiertz, N., ed. 'Entre ciel et terre', History of Paris Airports. Paris, Le Cherche Midi, 1995. Marais, J-G. and Simi, R 'Caviation commerciale'. Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1964. Merlin, P. 'Geographie, economie et planification des transports'. Paris, Presses uni- versitaires de France, 1991. Merlin, P. 'Les transports en France'. Paris, Documentation fran~aise, 1994. Naveau, J. 'CEurope et Ie transport aerien'. Brussels, Bruylant, 1983. Neiertz, N. 'La coordination des transports en France de 1918 a nos jours'. Unpub­ lished doctoral thesis, Paris IV- Sorbonne University, 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Windham Airport (IJD)
    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Windham Airport (IJD) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL WINDHAM AIRPORT (IJD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 March 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Windham Municipal Airport (IJD) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 2/23/17 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL WINDHAM AIRPORT (IJD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B. As such, environmental review for the project is not subject to CEPA, and this ROD (prepared prior to November 2017) is not applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clearing House Arrangement
    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Articles & Book Chapters Faculty Scholarship 1991 The Clearing House Arrangement Benjamin Geva Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected] Source Publication: Canadian Business Law Journal. Volume 19 (1991), p. 138-165. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Geva, Benjamin. "The Clearing House Arrangement." Canadian Business Law Journal 19 (1991): 138-165. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. THE CLEARING HOUSE ARRANGEMENT Benjamin Geva * 1. Introduction: Multilateral Netting, Clearing and Settlement In its narrow sense, "clearing system" is a mechanism for the calculation of mutual positions within a group of participants ("counterparties") with a view to facilitate the settlement of their mutual obligations on a net basis. In its broad sense, the term further encompasses the settlement of the obligations, that is, the completion of payment discharging them. In that respect, "clearing system" is sometimes used to describe a process of multi- lateral netting by novation 1 and the settlement of the conse- quential payments. 2 In this broad sense, "clearing system" thus covers both "clearing" (denoting netting of obligations) as well as "settlement" (denoting payment of obligations). The organization operating a clearing system is known as a "clearing house". 3 Participants in the "clearing system" are Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University.
    [Show full text]
  • Hartford Brainard Airport Business Plan
    AIRPORT BUSINESS PLAN Hartford-Brainard Airport Prepared for: Business Plan Executive Summary Prepared by: May 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 9 2.4 Historical Airport Data ............................................................................................... 10 2.5 Baseline Financial Data .............................................................................................. 11 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 13 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR HARTFORD-BRAINARD AIRPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Goulet Printery Printersof the Simsbury Fly-In Program
    WHERE THE DONATIONS GO TABLE OF CONTENTS imsbury Airport is a public use airport yet it receives no WHERE THE DONATIONS GO 1 Slocal, state or federal funding of any kind. Not a single HISTORY OF THE SIMSBURY FLY-IN 1 one of your tax dollars has ever gone to keeping this airport EXHIBITORS/ADVERTISERS 5 open. So, how is the airport funded? From aircraft tiedown BETCHA DIDN’T KNOW 6 fees, subleasing office space and selling fuel; but even those sources are not adequate to cover operational costs. So how PORTER AND CHESTER INSTITUTE 9 do we stay financially viable? The Simsbury Fly-In and Car NOTEWORTHY AIRCRAFT 10 show is the major factor in making ends meet. Whether you SEMINARS 13 buy a t-shirt, make a donation at the gate, eat a burger or THE WHOLE PICTURE 14 volunteer your time, you’re helping preserve a vital transpor- tation link and a tremendous resource for your local commu- YOU’RE BUILDING WHAT?!?! 17 nity. All the money raised here will go towards keeping the THE DIGITAL COCKPIT 21 airport operating. SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 25 None of the Simsbury Flying Club board members SPECIAL THANKS 26 receive compensation of any kind. We do this because we EVENT MAP 29 love aviation, the Simsbury Airport and the freedom of flight. FAMILY OWNED SINCE NEW 31 We hope you get to experience some of that magic at this event today. If you have any questions, just find anyone with EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION 35 a bright yellow shirt that CROSSWORD ANSWER KEY 41 says “EVENT STAFF” and SIMSBURY FLY-IN COMMITTEE 42 we’ll be happy to help you.
    [Show full text]