Seminar on Coastal Lagoon Research, Present and Future; Coastal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seminar on Coastal Lagoon Research, Present and Future; Coastal Unesco technical papers in marine science 33 Coastal lagoon research, present and future Proceedings of an Unesco/IABO Seminar Unesco 1981 2 3 KARS 1982 UNESCO TECHNICAL PAPERS IN MARINE SCIENCE Numbers 2,3, 5,6, 7,9. IO, 12, 13, 18, are out of stock. For full titles see inside back cover. Numbers 1,4,8 and 14 are incorporated in No. 27. No. Year SCOR No. Year SCOR WG WG 11 An intercomparison of some current meters, 26 Marine science in the Gulf area - Report of a report on an experiment at WHOI Mooring Site consultative meeting. Paris, 11-14 November 1975 1976 “D", 16-24 July 1967 by the Working Group on Continuous Current Velocity Measurements. Sponsored by SCOR, IAPSO and Unesco 1969 WG 21 27 Collected reports of the joint panel on oceano­ graphic tables and standards. 1964-1969 1976 WG IO IS Monitoring life in the ocean; sponsored by 28 Eighth report of the joint panel on oceano­ SCOR, ACMRR, Unesco, IBP/PM 1973 WG 29 graphic tables and standards. Woods Hole, 16 Sixth report of the joint panel on oceanographic U.S.A., sponsored by Unesco, ICES, SCOR, tables and standards, Kiel, 24-26 January 1973; IAPSO 1978 WG IO sponsored by Unesco, ICES, SCOR, I APSO 1974 WG IO Committee for the preparation of CLOFETA - 17 An intercomparison of some current meters, Report of the first meeting. Paris, report on an experiment of Research Vessel 16-18 janvier 1978 1979 Akademic Kurchatov, March-April 1970. by the 30 Ninth report of the joint panel on oceanographic Working Group on Current Velocity Measurements; tables and standards, Unesco, Paris. sponsored by SCOR, I APSO. Unesco 1974 WG21 11-13 September 1978 1979 19 Marine Science Teaching at the University Level. 31 Coastal lagoon survey (1976-1978) 1980 Report of the Unesco Workshop on University Curricula -Available in English, French, Spanish 32 Costal lagoon research, present and future. and Arabic 1974 Report and guidelines of a seminar, Duke University Marine Laboratory, Beaufort, NC, 20 Ichthvoplankton. Report of the CICAR Ichthyo- U.S.A., August 1978. (Unesco, IABO). plankton Workshop - Aiso published in Spanish 1975 1981 21 An intercomparison of open sea tidal pressure 33 Coastal lagoon research, present and future. sensors. Report of SCOR Working Group 27: Proceedings of a seminar, Duke University, “Tides of the open sea” 1975 WG 27 August 1978. (Unesco, IABO). To be 22 European sub-regional co-operation in oceano­ 1981 graphy. Report of working group sponsored 34 The carbon budget of the oceans. Report of a by the Unesco Scientific Co-operation Bureau for meeting. Paris, 12-13 November 1979 1980 WG 62 Europe and the Division of Marine Sciences 1975 35 Determination of chlorophyll in seawater. 23 An intercomparison of some current meters, III. Report of intercalibration tests sponsored by Report on an experiment carried out from the SCOR and carried out by C.J. Lorenzen and Research Vessel Atlantis II, August-Scptcmber S.W. Jeffrey, CSIRO Cronulîa, N.S.W., 1972, by the Working Group on Continuous Australia, September-October 1978 1980 Velocity Measurements : sponsored by SCOR, IAPSO and Unesco 1975 WG 21 36 Tenth report of the joint panel on oceanographic 24 Seventh report of the joint panel on oceano­ tables and standards, Sidney, B.C., Canada, graphic tables and standards, Grenoble, 1-5 September 1980. Sponsored by Unesco, ICES, 2-5 September 1975; sponsored by Unesco, SCOR, IAPSO. 1981 WG ICES, SCOR, IAPSO 1976 WG IO 37 Background papers and supporting data on the 25 Marine science programme for the Red Sea : Practical Salinity Scale 1978. 1981 WG K Recommendations of the workshop held in 38 Background papers and supporting data on the Bremerhaven, FRG, 22-23 October 1974; International Equation of State of Seawater 1980. 1981 WG if sponsored by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein- 39 International Oceanographic Tables, Vol. 3. 1981 WG 1' schaft and Unesco 1976 Unesco technical papers in marine science 33 Coastal lagoon research, present and future Proceedings of a seminar Duke University Marine Laboratory Beaufort, NC U.S.A. August 1978 (Unesco, IABO) Unesco 1981 Published in 1911 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75.00 Paris. Printed in Unesco’s workshops © Unesco 1982 Muted in France PREFACE This s«ri«8| tht Ona se a ItcJinlol Pleura in Marin* Sciani». ls produced b> the Dnasco Division «2 Marina Scianea» aa autos of informing tha sei anti fie eo*munity of racant davalopaanta in ocsa- no*raphic rasaarch and Earina Scianea affaira* Many of tha texta puhi!shad within tha sariaa ragult tros rasaarch activitias of tha Sciantifie Coanittaa on Oceanic Rasaarch (SCOB ) and ara subaittad to Onaaco for printing following final approval by SCOB of tha ralavant working group raport* Unesco Technical gagara An Marini Scianea ara distributed free of charge to various institutions and governaental authorities* Bequests for copies of individual titles or additions to tha nail*' lng list should ba addressed» on letterhead stationary if possible toi Division of Marina Sciences Unesco Piaea da Fontanoy 75700 Paris France [ 1 XAÜLL L£ Lif-miS PAGÇ 1NTHCCUCT It'A 5 PRESENT COASTAL LACGON RESEARCH session x havaica? jimalBMX.* non-living r««ioufc»a Ch&lrd&n: F*B* Phla^tr F*fi* Ph’.ct’,cr A r«vi«« of soa* general f«atur«a 7 of coastal lagoona» J«FtF* Zlnnarmenn The flushing of atll-alnd -tidal 15 lagoons and lts seasonal fluctuations* G* Allen/M* Nichols Suspended sediaent transport in 27 coastal lagoons and estuaries* SflSSittti IX CbtulfiXry» bio.gftOcbaiBl.alrY Chairman: E* Handelii E* Handelii On the hydrography and cheaistry of 81 some coastal lagoons of the Pacific Coast of Mexico* V*E* arumhein Biogeochemlstry and seomicrc* 97 biology of lagoons and lagoonary environments* H* Postica Processes in the sediments and III in the va terosadiment interface* T* Okuda Inorganic and organic nitrogen 119 contents in some coastal lagoons in Venezuela* flEflElQK iii HJL.aI.0flY "4” Chairman: Y* Halia Y* Halim Coastal lakes of the Nile Delta 135 Laie Menzalah D*U*S• feae Some aspects of the spatial and 173 temporal variations of phytoplankton in coaatal lagoons A* Yano? Ecology in the inlet of Puerto Realt 191 Terminos Lagoon -3- A. Y&ntz Fish oecurrneti diversity» and 233 aLundanca of two tropical coastal lagoon with sphasaral inlsts on tho Pacific Coast of Mexico C»<«G< olaryir r. A review of the poton tisii ties ter 261 research and fleti culture in the coastal lagoons of Vest Africa SESSIuH IX Biclogy Chairmans B.O. Jansson B*0« Jansson Production dynamics of a. temperate 273 nea: the Baltic KmfCm Parkar Guidelines of ecosyatea research 305 in coastal lagoons Pm Laaaarra Biological approach to coastal 315 lagoons: setabolisa and physiological ecology S«*. Nixon The flux of carbon* nitrogen* and 325 phosphorus between coastal lagoons and offshore waters -4“ INTRODUIT! U N Th« prcMDt voIxine constitutes the compilation of the p«p«rs pre­ sented at the Seminar on Coastal Lagoon research* Present and Future halei at the Duke University Marine Laboratory* Beaufort* N.C.» W.S.A» from 29 August to 2 September 1978 under the section of the Seminar entitled "Present Coastal Lagoon Besearch". It goes in sequence with No* J2 of the Unesco Technical Papers in Marine Science which contains the Report and Guidelines of the Seminar* A description of the objectives of the seminar and the list of participants will he found respectively in the Introduction and in Annex II ul No* 32* -s- A r*vit* of boko general faaturaa of coastal lagoons by Fred B. Phleger At the synposlva on coastal lagoons in Mexico City in 1967 1 pre­ sent sei what dsened to be appropriate coeaents on sona general fea­ tures of coestal lagoons (Phlegeri 1967a )• Considerable research by nun oro os 1 rvestigators during the Intervening years mites it desirable to review these generalizations and to naka Modifica­ tions and additions* I shall not refer to others by nans* although 1t is obvious that ay consents ara based on the work of many people* My rsesrksy however» express ay own opinions and they are meed mostly on my own experience studying lagoons* The type of coastal lagoon which I am discussing is a body of brackish» marine or hypersaline water iapounded by a sandy har­ rier and havieg an inlet connecting with the open ocean* Each coastal lagoon dlffsrs from ali othsrs* Those differences funda­ mentally involve size» shape» tidal ranga» runoff of tributary streams» climats of the arca» number and size of Inlets and kind and amount of eediment available* Differences in water movement» chemistry» geology and ecology result froa theso basic factors* Differences may be great or email* but nevertheless it is posslbls to formulate generalizations which apply to many or perhaps most lagoons* I havs found thos* useful in guiding legoocel studies end as ar. aid to interpretations* Ths following oro soms of my present generalizations in ebbreviatsd or noto fora* I am surs that additions and/or modifications can be made to these* 1* Many or most Bodarti lagoons have developed during the rising sse level of the lest 6»009-8»000 years* Thers is e veli—eatab- llshed pause in the riss of soa lovei about 7*000 years ago when the level was about IO m lower than at present* A send beach was formed at this level at this tina* As sea level rose later» this sand deposit grew upward and prograded seaward to fora a lagoon barrier» as shown» for example» at OJo de Llefcre Lagoon (Phleger and Ewing» 1962) in Mexico and at Galveston Bay» Texes <Bernard* Le Blanc» Major* 1962)* 2* Lagoena develop on aggrading or formerly aggraded coastal plainn which ara gently eloping seaward and vtiarw there is abun— 7 cant sediment* They ara always associa tad with «odam or formerly active rivers which ara tributary to than or tiea Into tha ocaan nearb) • The rivers supply sadlaant to tba naarabora turbulent zona which Is accumulated on tha sand barriers by wave and long” shore tronrort.
Recommended publications
  • 2011-2012 Sustainability Report
    2011-2012 Sustainability Report Revised September 19, 2012 to correct tables on page 32 On the cover: Nature and its resources are critical to our business. Lake Tahoe, one of the world’s most pristine crystal blue alpine lakes, is just 15 minutes from The Ritz-Carlton®, Lake Tahoe (California), a LEED® Silver certified hotel (shown here). Contents Executive Letter 1 Marriott Business Values 12 Marriott and the Environment 30 About This Report 2 Workforce 13 Energy/Water/Waste/Carbon 32 Determining Materiality 2 Global Diversity and Inclusion 18 Supply Chain 37 Stakeholders 2 Human Rights 21 Green Buildings 40 Areas of Stakeholder Collaboration 3 Guest Satisfaction 22 Educating and Inspiring Associates and Guests 41 The Way We Do Business 6 Marriott Economic Hotel Development 23 Innovative Conservation Initiatives 43 Our Company 7 Marriott and Society 24 Awards and Recognition 45 Our Business Model 7 Shelter and Food/Poverty Alleviation 26 GRI Report Parameters 46 Global Growth 8 Vitality of Children 27 GRI Content Index 47 Governance 10 Readiness for Hotel Careers 28 Ethics 10 MARPAC Disbursements 11 1 To Our Stakeholders We are investing in sustainable development and innovative conservation initiatives, such as the following, that will provide long-term solutions to critical social and environmental issues. z In 2011, we announced our plan to open our first hotel in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, an area devastated by the 2010 earthquake. The tireless fundraising and volunteerism of our associates, hundreds with family connections in Haiti, inspired us personally to consider ways to help tourism return to the country. The hotel is scheduled to open in 2014, creating jobs and much-needed hotel and meeting space as Haiti recovers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sekecan and Other Influences 01 Six
    SEKECAN AND OTHER INFLUENCES 01 SIX ELIZABETHAN REVENGE PLAYS APPROVED* I<d»<ti2!ii5-^25axslwi Profeaeor ^. i. Direct or af He" feej/^traent' of th« SENECAK AID OTHER IRFLTJENCBS 01 SIX amSSTHAI KEVENGE PLAYS THESIS Present ©cl to th© Sra&uat® Council of tfa« Berth Texas Stat® €©ll®g® in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For th© B«gr®« of MASTER OF ARTS Bit 223584 Marilyn Fisher, R# A, Thornton, Texas August, 195S 2235m TABLE OP CO*T**rS Chapter ?ag9 X* THE VOGtflS or StfUSCA, 1670-1600 1 Definition of tha Tragedy of Blood Elements of Senaoaii f nige^y Appeal of 3an«oan Eras® Direct Imitations of Son#@a Departure iwm. Bmmmm Mod®! II* PROBLEMS OP CBRONOStOGTZt SOURCES, ARB AUTHORSHIP 14 2r«» ^i.ii.iwii>iiiliiv,i.ii foe Jew of Malta The' frlrif t Part of Xerotilino III. I1TEHRELAf IOKS Of SIX TRAGEDIES OP 8BVSR8X *2? lesta®©* of Each Revenge Play 5«qmbs Heaeata in tbe Tragediea of Revenge Mutual Dependence of Kyd# Marlowe, and Shakeapeare Parallax Devices Charaet arlaiftt ions If. DRMSATIC A® STOISTIC DEVICES CP THE HEVtSCIt PfcSjS. • . .58 ?b® Cborua In Bm&m and Rmm$® Play®' Innovation of tba Dunb Show and Play-withli*- t be-Play Art in Seaeea and Revenge Playa V. CONCLTISIOB 85 B1BLI0SMPB1 91 cmrtm i THE VOBTJE m Stmck, 1570*1000 I» this thesis mn attempt will be sade to tra©# briefly the revival of Seneoart tragedy from 1570 to the end of the sixteenth eenttiry through s«®te of the earlier translations, adaptations, end imitations, and to evaluate the stgnlfl* mm* of the final evolution of eueh works into the BUssabethan tragedy of revenge.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Corporate Responsibility Report Executive Letter
    2019 Corporate Responsibility Report Executive Letter We compile this report to reflect on our progress toward our corporate responsibility goals amidst an extraordinary global health crisis and as our nation tackles issues of equality and justice. During these tumultuous times we reaffirm our commitment to listening, learning, revising and responding to the changing needs of the many stakeholders across our value chain. Against this backdrop, we are proud of how We are also focused on reducing our carbon quickly and effectively our 26,000 employees footprint. New to our corporate responsibility have united to keep each other safe and healthy, platform this year is the unveiling of our deliver for our customers and consumers and science-based carbon-reduction goals. The new provide for our communities. Our response commitments have been validated by the Science reflects our commitment to harness the collective Based Targets initiative, ensuring that we are power of our business to make a positive impact doing our part to mitigate climate change by in the lives we touch. reducing carbon emissions across our value chain. In 2019, we introduced our new corporate During this past year we became inaugural responsibility platform, Drink Well. Do Good. members of Business For Inclusive Growth Through this platform we established multi- (B4IG), a coalition of 40 leading international year goals and initiatives for our supply chain, companies committed to business action to the environment, health and wellbeing and advance human rights, build inclusive workplaces our communities. To meet these ambitious and strengthen inclusion across company value commitments, we designed a comprehensive and chains.
    [Show full text]
  • Compassion + Action for Twenty Years
    COMPASSION + ACTION FOR TWENTY YEARS NEW HOPE HOUSING, INC. NEW HOPE HOUSING, INC. Hope Energy Homelessness and substandard housing destroy Based on the belief that architecture can have lives, wrench apart families and degrade a profound effect on the human spirit, we build communities. Every day more people live on the well-designed, stylish and sustainable properties PE edge, but solutions often are elusive. that win awards and accolades nationally and internationally. As long-term solutions to the New Hope For 20 years, New Hope Housing has helped problem of homelessness and inadequate housing, Housing’s core purpose people mend their lives and recover their dignity each property is a vital part of its surrounding is to provide life-stabilizing, affordable, permanent housing by providing affordable, beautiful housing. Our community. with support services for people approach is smart and levelheaded, and our results who live on limited incomes. have real human impact. Our mission touches the lives of many – not just Our vision is to become a our residents – in myriad inspiring ways. Rooted permanent institution serving Houston’s most Beyond bricks and mortar, New Hope properties in compassion, it is full of life, hope, energy and vulnerable citizens. offer supportive environments that help people action. climb out of the tenuous situation of life on the Opposite O streets and on the edge, to repurpose and stabilize 2424 Sakowitz, Texas’ first their lives. Once people have a place to call their LEED multifamily affordable housing own, a place they can be proud of, we believe they Top Right can begin to move forward to heal other parts of Brays Crossing living unit their life as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Readiness Assessment of Green Building Certification Systems For
    sustainability Article Readiness Assessment of Green Building Certification Systems for Residential Buildings during Pandemics Aidana Tleuken 1, Galym Tokazhanov 1 , Mert Guney 1,2 , Ali Turkyilmaz 1,3 and Ferhat Karaca 1,2,* 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Av., Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (G.T.); [email protected] (M.G.); [email protected] (A.T.) 2 The Environment & Resource Efficiency Cluster (EREC), Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan 3 Master of Engineering Management Program, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-7172-704553; Fax: +7-7172-706054 Abstract: One of the consequences of COVID-19 pandemic is the momentum it has created for global changes affecting various aspects of daily lives. Among these, green building certification systems (GBCSs) should not be left behind as significant potential modifications may be required to ensure their versatility for residential buildings due to the new pandemic reality. The present study aims to evaluate the readiness of chosen GBCSs for a proper assessment of existing residential housing sustainability in a post-pandemic world. Based on a literature review of the state-of- the-art data sources and round table discussions, the present study proposes a particular set of sustainability indicators covering special sustainability requirements under pandemic conditions. Then, those indicators are used to evaluate the readiness of selected GBCSs (BREEAM, LEED, WELL, CASBEE) to meet new pandemic-resilient requirements based on their responses to the indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2013 5 Our COMPANY
    About Coca-Cola FEMSA GRI 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7 Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. produces and distributes Coca-Cola, Fanta, Sprite, Del Valle and other trademark beverages of The Coca-Cola Company in Mexico (a substantial part of Central Mexico, including Mexico City as well as the Southern and the Northeast of the country), Guatemala (Guatemala City and surrounding areas), Nicaragua (nationwide), Costa Rica (nationwide), Panama (nationwide), Colombia (most of the country), Venezuela (nationwide), Brazil (Greater São Paulo, Campiñas, Santos the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, the State of Paraná, part of the State of Goias, part of the State of Río de Janeiro and part of the State of Minas Gerais), Argentina (Federal Capital of Buenos Aires and surrounding areas) and the Philippines (nationwide), along with bottled water, juices, teas, isotonic sports drinks, beer and other beverages in some of these territories. The Company has 64 bottling facilities and serves more than 346 million consumers, approximately through 2,900,000 retailers, with more than 120,000 employees worldwide. The company’s capital stock is owned 47.9% by Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA), 28.1% by wholly owned subsidiaries of The Coca-Cola Company and 24.0% by the public. The publicly traded shares of KOF are Series L shares with limited voting rights that are listed on the Bolsa Mexican de Valores (BMV: KOF L) and as American Depositary Receipts (ADSs) on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: KOF).
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc
    A NEW COMPANY with a heritage spanning centuries… Our brands have been synonymous with refreshment, revitalization, fun and fl avor for generations. In 2008, those 50-plus brands became Dr Pepper Snapple Group, the oldest new company traded on the New York Stock Exchange. We may be a new player in the equity markets, but the equity of our brands is unmistakably strong and growing. Th is report illustrates the power and potential of great brands and great people to produce great results. EXPERIENCED LEADERSHIP Dr Pepper Snapple Group is an integrated refreshment beverage business serving consumers across the U.S., Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean. Our business is led by an experienced management team that is focused on building capabilities to support growth and create shareholder value. With 200 years of collective food and beverage industry experience, this team has worked with top consumer brands, managed complex supply chains and developed strong relationships with key players in the industry. From left to right: Larry D. Young, President & Chief Executive Offi cer; Tina S. Barry, Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs; John O. Stewart, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Offi cer; James L. Baldwin, Jr., Executive Vice President, General Counsel; Rodger L. Collins, President, Packaged Beverages; Pedro Herrán Gacha, Executive Vice President, Strategy & President, Mexico & Caribbean; Derry L. Hobson, Executive Vice President, Supply Chain; James J. Johnston, Jr., President, Beverage Concentrates; Lawrence N. Solomon, Executive Vice President, Human Resources; David J. Thomas, Ph.D., Senior Vice President, Research & Development; Jim R. Trebilcock, Executive Vice President, Marketing Dr Pepper is served for Jean Jacob Schweppe Mott’s brand starts as the fi rst time at the Charles Grigg invents 7UP Peñafi el, Mexico’s oldest perfects a process for a line of apple cider and Old Corner Drug Store mineral water, is founded making carbonated water vinegar offerings in Waco, Texas in Puebla 1783 1842 1885 1929 1948 DPS at-a- GLANCE • No.
    [Show full text]
  • N You1 ,TT E .Nkl,Nl
    _NYou 1 ,T Te .nkl,n RA 5-3300 .1 VE WS-RECORD Thursdayl VOL. 8, No. g SOMERSST, N¯ J. THURSDAY, O~’t’OBER 6, 1981 6¢ Per Copy STUDENTCOUNCILPLANS FOR DEDICATIONoNHSAS ¢.O,0STAT ’MBTAw.IT O M ay0r ACcepts .,o.-Councilman ha,r.oaofthogowo Francis Keary, .e Challenge to Attth0rlty, will make a state- ,meat ...... on ha,the ....appointment .olo.m" D,osuf Debate,,=j’e teghy to exeeullve director at the SA meeting Mondaynight. Mayor Gee,rue B, Consovoy to- The meetlug, scheduled for :lay a e e opted 1he offes of 6 p.m., will be held in the Photons S. Reflly: presldent of Sewerage Authority o/flee nn he Democratic Men’s Club. to Railroad Square. Jiscus.s the Council Tilling bar- ring:ease,, l’~2o~llngmee,,ngs. devices fr o rr~ AllenCriticizes The mayor said he WOUld be glad to dlsuL~ss tba~ topic. "and LateCampaigning anyother ~eJlly, wldehUnder thedisturbs auspices of the L~ague of Women Voters, or r William O. Allen, candidate ° for ~n at-large Council sea~, ~h[8 any other non-partisan organi week urged voters to demand zatioa." Mr. Consovey’s s~atement fel- that candidates show" an interest ls municipal affairs *’at ’.trees lowed a challenge ~o debate iv- used by Mr, ReLUy aBer the Council ruled affair=st recordhtg Mr. Allen said he is "amazed devices on Sept. 26. at people, never who, having Mr. ReilIy expressed A desire interest shown any in municipal lo discuss no~ only the ban on PLANNING COMMrrTEE -- Members of lhe FranklBt High Seho0l Sttldeltt Cotmell dtsettss iffajrs, soddenly offer all sorts recorders, which he described plans for the school’s dedisatian program and open house Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • TCS Corporate Sustainability Report 2018 160119.Cdr
    Corporate Sustainability 2017 Report 2018 Impact through Empowerment About Tata Consultancy Services (TCS)1 Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is an IT services, consulting and business solutions provider that has been partnering with the world's largest businesses in their transformation journeys for the last fifty years. TCS offers a consulting-led, cognitive powered, integrated portfolio of business, technology and engineering services and solutions. This is delivered through its unique, location independent Agile delivery model, a benchmark of excellence in software development. A part of the Tata group, India's largest multinational business group, TCS has over 394,000 of the world's best- trained consultants in 46 countries. The company generated consolidated revenues of US $19.1 billion for the year ended March 31, 2018 and is listed on BSE (formerly Bombay Stock Exchange) and the NSE (National Stock Exchange) in India. TCS' proactive stance on climate change and award winning work with communities across the world have earned it a place in leading sustainability indices such as the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI), MSCI Global Sustainability Index and the FTSE4Good Emerging Index. About the Report 1 CEO’s Message 2 Organizational Profile 5 TCS by numbers 6 Awards and Recognition 7 Stakeholder Engagement and Materiality Definition 10 Sustainability Strategy: 15 n Profit 17 n People 25 n Planet 42 Contact 48 GRI Standards – Content Index 49 1102-1, 102-2,102-5 About the Report2 TCS publishes the Sustainability Report on an annual basis. The last report was published for FY 2016-17. The 12th Sustainability Report, for financial year 2017-18 (1st April 2017 to 31st March 2018), uses the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards, while focusing on the principles of materiality and stakeholder inclusiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Unilever Brands
    The Diffusion and Distribution of New Consumer Packaged Foods in Emerging Markets and what it Means for Globalized versus Regional Customized Products - http://globalfoodforums.com/new-food-products-emerging- markets/ - Composed May 2005 APPENDIX I: SELECTED FOOD BRANDS (and Sub-brands) Sample of Unilever Food Brands Source: http://www.unilever.com/brands/food/ Retrieved 2/7/05 Global Food Brand Families Becel, Flora Hellmann's, Amora, Calvé, Wish-Bone Lipton Bertolli Iglo, Birds Eye, Findus Slim-Fast Blue Band, Rama, Country Crock, Doriana Knorr Unilever Foodsolutions Heart Sample of Nestles Food Brands http://www.nestle.com/Our_Brands/Our+Brands.htm and http://www.nestle.co.uk/about/brands/ - Retrieved 2/7/05 Baby Foods: Alete, Beba, Nestle Dairy Products: Nido, Nespray, La Lechera and Carnation, Gloria, Coffee-Mate, Carnation Evaporated Milk, Tip Top, Simply Double, Fussells Breakfast Cereals: Nesquik Cereal, Clusters, Fruitful, Golden Nuggets, Shreddies, Golden Grahams, Cinnamon Grahams, Frosted Shreddies, Fitnesse and Fruit, Shredded Wheat, Cheerios, Force Flake, Cookie Crisp, Fitnesse Notes: Some brands in a joint venture – Cereal Worldwide Partnership, with General Mills Ice Cream: Maxibon, Extreme Chocolate & Confectionery: Crunch, Smarties, KitKat, Caramac, Yorkie, Golden Cup, Rolo, Aero, Walnut Whip, Drifter, Smarties, Milkybar, Toffee Crisp, Willy Wonka's Xploder, Crunch, Maverick, Lion Bar, Munchies Prepared Foods, Soups: Maggi, Buitoni, Stouffer's, Build Up Nutrition Beverages: Nesquik, Milo, Nescau, Nestea, Nescafé, Nestlé's
    [Show full text]
  • View These Patents As Valuable Assets but We Do Not View Any Single Patent As Critical to Our Success
    KEURIG DR PEPPER DR KEURIG 2020 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2020 A MODERN BEVERAGE COMPANY 2020 ANNUAL REPORT FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS All Information is presented on an Adjusted basis* 2018–2020 All amounts are in millions except Earnings Per Share 2019–2020 2018 Two-Year Twelve months ended December 31 2020 2019 Change Pro Forma Avg. Change Net Sales $11,618 $11,120 4.5% $11,024 2.7% Constant Currency Net Sales Growth 5.0% 4.1% 1 Cost of Sales 5,092 4,792 6.3% 4,864 2.3% Selling, General and Administrative Expenses 3,374 3,483 -3.1% 3,556 -2.6% Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net (39) (45) NM (16) NM Income from Operations 3,191 2,890 10.4% 2,620 10.4% Constant Currency Income from Operations Growth 10.8% 10.7% % Net Sales 27.5% 26.0% 150 bps 23.8% 185 bps Interest Expense 542 553 -2.0% 635 -7.6% Other Income, Net 17 19 -10.5% 3 NM Income before Taxes 2,632 2,318 13.5% 1,982 15.2% Provision for Income Taxes 644 591 9.0% 524 10.9% Effective Tax Rate 24.5% 25.5% -100 bps 26.4% -100 bps Net Income 1,988 1,727 15.1% 1,458 16.8% Diluted Earnings Per Share $1.40 $1.22 14.8% $1.04 16.0% Diluted Shares 1,422 1,419 0.2% 1,401 0.7% * Please refer to the Form 10-K, included with this report, for reconciliations from GAAP to Adjusted results 1 Reflects underlying net sales growth 2018–2019 KDP Management Leverage Ratio* 2020 Net Sales by Segment in billions 12/31/20 3.6X 12/31/19 4.5X 2.4X 12/31/18 5.4X $0.5 7/9/18 6.0X $1.3 *See Management Leverage Ratio reconciliation and calculation on page 12 $4.4 Operating Cash Flow in billions 2020 $2.5 2019 $2.5 $5.4 2018 $1.6 Total Shareholder Return 150% 131% 2020 Net Sales 120% Constant Currency Growth 90% 84% Coffee Systems +4.8% 60% 54% Packaged Beverages +8.5% 30% 0% Beverage Concentrates -6.2% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Latin America Beverages +3.8% KDP1 S&P 500 S&P 500 Food & Beverage Index 1Represents DPS through 7/9/2018 and KDP 7/10/2018 to 12/31/2020 Bob Gamgort Chairman and Chief Executive Officer DEAR SHAREHOLDERS As I write this letter, cautious optimism is in the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Coca-Cola Company (Herein Known As Coke) Possesses One of the Most Recognized Brands on the Planet
    Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One: Organizational Profile............................................................................... 3 1.1 Operations ................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Brands.......................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Bottling Process ......................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Production Facilities................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Coke Executives and their Salaries .......................................................................... 8 1.6 Board of Directors ...................................................................................................... 9 1.7 Public Relations ........................................................................................................ 10 1.8 University Links ........................................................................................................ 11 Chapter Two: Economic Profile..................................................................................... 14 2.1 Financial Data............................................................................................................ 14 2.2 Joint Ventures
    [Show full text]