DOCSLIB.ORG

THE ATTICIST GRAMMARIANS John AL Lee 1. a Atticism Was A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE ATTICIST GRAMMARIANS John AL Lee 1. a Atticism Was A THE ATTICIST GRAMMARIANS John A.L. Lee 1. Atticism Atticism was a complex phenomenon that has been described and ex- plained in numerous ways, but its essential element was the tendency to look back to the language and literature of a former era as the model to follow, from a later time when the spoken language had changed and origi- nal composition of that literature was in the past. The former era was the Classical period, and access to it was through its texts, which were stud- ied and imitated in the education system. The later time was almost the whole of the post-Classical period: the phenomenon appeared in the rst century bc, reached a peak in the second century ad, and continued its inu- ence through the Byzantine era, with efects still today. The results were seen not only in writing but in the shape of the language as a whole, in a difer- entiation of the spoken and written varieties, or a “diglossy/diglossia,” that afected Greek for the rest of its history.1 Atticism was not simply a linguistic phenomenon but part of a larger enterprise to recover the Classical past. The cultural world of fth and fourth century bc Athens was to be recreated, in literature, rhetoric, the arts and philosophy. Powerful cultural and social forces fostered the enterprise, and even emperors supported it. The whole was an exercise in imitation, but it had a deep and enduring—some would say disastrous—impact.2 1 For an accurate de nition of the term (too long to repeat here), see Ferguson’s in R.A. Hudson, Sociolinguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 54. I am grateful to Michael Curran for reading this chapter and ofering many useful comments. 2 The literature is extensive. Recommended are: Graham Anderson, The Second Sophis- tic: A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire (London: Routledge, 1993), esp. 86–100; E.L. Bowie, “Greeks and Their Past in the Second Sophistic,” Past and Present 46 (1970): 3–41; Robert Browning, Medieval and Modern Greek (2nd ed.; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 44–50; 104–113; Geofrey C. Horrocks, Greek: A History of the Language and its Speakers (London: Longman, 1997), 78–86; 151–153; J.N. Kazazis (trans. Deborah Kazazis), “Atticism,” in A.-F. Christidis, ed., A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 1200–1212, 1215–1217; Simon Swain, 284 john a.l. lee The attempt to turn the clock back created complexity for users of the language, especially when they wished to commit anything to writing, or, at a more advanced level, engage in rhetorical display. Anyone who had been to school had been introduced to the notion that some forms, words, and uses were “better” or more “correct” than others. They were the ones that matched the Classical models, contrasting with new features that had arisen as a result of change in the spoken language. The contemporary, spoken language was disparaged, the older, obsolete features were approved and accorded prestige. The need for guidance in nding one’s way through these arti cial shoals soon led to the creation of works ofering instruction in how to do it. The authors of these works were the Atticist grammarians.3 There is a long list of names of Atticist grammarians, though most of their works survive today only in fragments. The efects of their eforts, however, and of the whole movement to treat the Greek of the past as the model of good Greek, are to be seen in almost all the written remains of post-Classical Greek. Most works of literature from that period exhibit arti cial Atticizing features to varying degrees, and even the lower levels of everyday writing display some inuence.4 Although the Atticizing movement had marked success, and writers at the top of the scale could write a whole work that appeared to reproduce the Attic of fth-century Athens, this Atticizing Greek was not a spoken language or dialect separate from Koine Greek; it was a stylistic variety, or rather group of varieties, added on to the living language, Koine Greek. The HellenismandEmpire:Language,Classicism,andPowerintheGreekWorld,AD50–250 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996), esp. 17–41; Tim Whitmarsh, The Second Sophistic (Greece & Rome: New Sur- veys in the Classics 35; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005); Rafaella Cribiore, Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni- versity Press, 2001), esp. ch. 8. It is worth noting that “Asianism,” against which Atticism was supposedly a reaction, is largely a ction: see Whitmarsh, Second Sophistic, 7–8; 50–51. 3 The epithet “grammarian” is not quite appropriate, but it is hard to nd a better alternative. 4 This last topic has hardly been touched. There are limited observations in Basil G. Man- dilaras, The Verb in the Greek Non-Literary Papyri (Athens: Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sciences, 1973), mostly on the optative; W. Schmid, Der Atticismus in seinen Hauptvertretern von Dionysius von Halikarnass bis auf den zweiten Philostratus (5 vols.; Stuttgart: Kohlham- mer, 1887–1897; repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1964), 3:19–33, passim; A. Kotsevalov, “Koine Syntax of Greek Colonies on the Black Sea,” in G.E. Mylonas and D. Raymond, eds., Studies Presented to D.M. Robinson (2 vols.; Saint Louis: Washington University Press, 1951–1953), 2:434–442. The only extensive study known to me is an unpublished work: Andrew L. Connolly, “Atticism in Non-literary Papyri of the First Seven Centuries ad: A Study in Several Features of Orthogra- phy and Syntax” (B.A. diss., University of Sydney, 1983)..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Atticist-Asianist Controversy
    Atticist-Asianist controversy. The termsAtticist andAsiamsl were employedover a period of severalcenturies (starting probably in the third century bce) in a debatethat was concernedas much with Next result ideologr and literary identity as it was with style and language. Developedin the Greek world, the terminolory was taken up by the < Searchresults Romansat a critical point in their literary history. It would be a mistaketo look for unity in a debatethat spannedso many centuries and two different literary cultures. In the secondhalf of the first century bce, we find at Rome a bad-temperedargUment among writers and orators over how the In this entry appellationAttic was to be employed.This purely Roman debate, like much of the literary and intellectualrevolution at Rome, was Atticist-Asia nist controversy conductedin terminolory taken over from Greek. Insofar asAttic had any meaning it denoteda plain and unadornedstyle of Bibliography composition;but its more irnportantfunction was evaluative. It was usedby the self-proclaimedAtticists as a term of approbationfor the Roman heirs of the greatfigures of the classicalGreek tradition and Isocrates):Attica Seealso (particularly Lysias, Demosthenes,Xenophon, is the reglon of Greecein which Athens is located.The antonym of Attic, on this view, wasAsianist, aterm best defined negatively; it o Classicalrhetoric . denotedall the bad qualitiesthat a dedicatedAtticist should avoid. (10643 bce),the o Stvle The principalobject of this needlingwas Cicero most famousorator of his day. RomanAtticism was thus in part a normal literary reactionto a familiar and prestigiousstyle, described Adjacent entries "full" by Quintilian as (Cicero'ssentences are often long and complexocharacterizndby attention to balance,rhythm, and o Arangement rhetorical effect).
    [Show full text]
  • Koine Pronunciation 2012
    Παράρτημα γ´ Ἡ Κοινὴ Προφορά 217 Ἡ Κοινὴ Προφορά Koiné Pronunciation Notes on the Pronunciation System of Koiné Greek, (These notes are of a technical nature beyond language learning, intended primarily for teachers.) When a person wants to use living language methods to learn a language, one is required to make some choices about what kind of pronunciation system to use. As long as students only need to write Greek or to look at Greek on a printed page, the pronunciation system is not a very important issue. As soon as students set their sights on a higher goal and want to include language learning methodologies that will lead to a fluent control of the language, they must come to grips with the need to include audio and oral material in a program. And audio material for an ancient language means that decisions must be made about the kind of pronunciation system to be used. Principles Governing the Pronunciation in this Course # 1. The pronunciation system is primarily intended for persons wishing to learn Koiné Greek, the general Greek dialect used from the third century before the Common Era (BCE) to the fourth century of the Common Era (CE). In particular, the focus is on the Koiné Greek of what is historically the Roman period in the land of Israel, 63 BCE to 325 CE. # 2. The pronunciation should preserve the same significant sound distinctions that were used in the Roman period. This means that the pronunciation system should be phonemic. This term will be explained below. # 3. The pronunciation system should, as far as practical, be historical.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Compose Great Prose: Cicero, Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Stylistic Theory in Late-Republican and Augustan Rome Issue Date: 2019-10-23
    Cover Page The following handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/79945 Author: Ooms, S Title: How to compose great prose: Cicero, Dionysius of Halicarnassus and stylistic theory in Late-Republican and Augustan Rome Issue Date: 2019-10-23 Chapter 5 TO BE ATTIC OR NOT TO BE ATTIC : THE FLUIDITY OF ATTICISM IN ORATORY , POLITICS AND LIFE 5.1 Introduction In the previous chapters, I have studied several major topics in the Greek and Latin discourse on prose style: in each case, we have seen that some features are universal to the common discourse, while others are particular to its various participants on account of their specific preferences, purposes and programs. The present chapter will demonstrate the same two crucial points with respect to the topic of Atticism: again, I will argue that the views of the critics and rhetoricians in Rome are built on a shared conceptual framework, while each author at the same time interprets elements from this common repertoire so as to suit their own goals and motivations. Specifically, we will see that there is a remarkable interplay between, on the one hand, the stylistic views of three prominent scholars, viz., Calvus, Cicero, and Dionysius, and, on the other hand, the contemporary political situation in Rome. There was hardly a greater compliment for an orator or prose author in Late- Republican and Augustan Rome than to be called ‘Attic’ (Ἀττικός , Atticus ). Our record of the city’s obsession with Attic style, now standardly referred to as Atticism, goes back to the middle of the first century BC, when a group of Roman orators, presumably led by C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Atticism on the Textual Transmission of I John with Particular Reference to the Alexandrian Text Type
    The influence of Atticism on the textual transmission of I John with particular reference to the Alexandrian text type PR de Lange 20557159 Verhandeling voorgelê ter nakoming vir die graad Magister in Grieks aan die Potchefstroomkampus van die Noordwes-Universiteit Studieleier: Prof GJC Jordaan April 2014 DEDICATION Not a day has passed throughout the duration of this study that I did not long for my mother, Leentie de Lange, who passed away in July 2011. I dedicate this study to her memory and love. Vir my moeder, Leentie de Lange, in liefdevolle en verlangende herinnering. Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the support of the following institutions towards the completion of this study: * The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. * The North-West University, for continuous financial support over a number of years. The Faculty of Theology of the North-West University, for providing me with the opportunity of lecturing in Greek, and in particular the Dean, Professor Fika Janse van Rensburg, who made this possible. I would further like to express my gratitude towards the following individuals: * Towards my supervisor, Professor Jorrie Jordaan, not only for his insight and guidance throughout this study, but also for casually remarking during a Greek II class in 2008 that, perhaps, one of the students in that class will one day show an interest in textual criticism. His enthusiasm for, and passionate commitment towards his discipline played a great role in my choice of focus for postgraduate study.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download 2.4 Mb
    Lucian and the Atticists: A Barbarian at the Gates by David William Frierson Stifler Department of Classical Studies Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ William A. Johnson, Supervisor ___________________________ Janet Downie ___________________________ Joshua D. Sosin ___________________________ Jed W. Atkins Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classical Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT Lucian and the Atticists: A Barbarian at the Gates by David William Frierson Stifler Department of Classical Studies Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ William A. Johnson, Supervisor ___________________________ Janet Downie ___________________________ Joshua D. Sosin ___________________________ Jed W. Atkins An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classical Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by David William Frierson Stifler 2019 Abstract This dissertation investigates ancient language ideologies constructed by Greek and Latin writers of the second and third centuries CE, a loosely-connected movement now generally referred to the Second Sophistic. It focuses on Lucian of Samosata, a Syrian “barbarian” writer of satire and parody in Greek, and especially on his works that engage with language-oriented topics of contemporary relevance to his era. The term “language ideologies”, as it is used in studies of sociolinguistics, refers to beliefs and practices about language as they function within the social context of a particular culture or set of cultures; prescriptive grammar, for example, is a broad and rather common example. The surge in Greek (and some Latin) literary output in the Second Sophistic led many writers, with Lucian an especially noteworthy example, to express a variety of ideologies regarding the form and use of language.
    [Show full text]
  • Atticism in Achilles Tatius: an Examination of Linguistic Purism in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon
    ATTICISM IN ACHILLES TATIUS: AN EXAMINATION OF LINGUISTIC PURISM IN ACHILLES TATIUS’ LEUCIPPE AND CLITOPHON By Sonja Mary Gammage Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Classics Programme at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban (Howard College) Supervisor: Prof. John Hilton 2018 COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES DECLARATION - PLAGIARISM I, Sonja Mary Gammage, declare that 1. The research reported in this thesis, except where otherwise indicated, is my original research. 2. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. 3. This thesis does not contain other persons’ data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other persons. 4. This thesis does not contain other persons’ writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then: a. Their words have been re-written but the general information attributed to them has been referenced b. Where their exact words have been used, then their writing has been placed in italics and inside quotation marks, and referenced. 5. This thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet, unless specifically acknowledged, and the source being detailed in the thesis and in the References sections. Signed ………………………………… Date ………………… i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am enormously grateful to those that provided monetary support for this PhD. The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. (Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF).
    [Show full text]
  • The Explosion of Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Ghosts of Rhetoric from the Artes Historicae to Postmodernist Historiography*
    Histos () CLXXV–CLXXXVI REVIEW–DISCUSSION THE EXPLOSION OF DIONYSIUS OF HALICARNASSUS: GHOSTS OF RHETORIC FROM THE ARTES HISTORICAE TO POSTMODERNIST HISTORIOGRAPHY* Richard L. Hunter and Casper C. de Jonge, edd., Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome: Rhetoric, Criticism and Historiography. Greek Culture in the Roman World. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, . Pp. ix + . Hardback, $.. ISBN ----. Friedrich Meins, Paradigmatische Geschichte: Wahrheit, Theorie und Methode in den Antiquitates Romanae des Dionysios von Halikarnassos. Palingenesia . Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, . Pp. Hardback, €,. ISBN --- -. t has long been a commonplace that every piece of scholarship concerning Dionysius of Halicarnassus should start with the complaint that the author I has been historically underappreciated and understudied. There were good reasons to do so. From the nineteenth century until just recently, Dionysius was considered a ‘dirty’ author to study. The lack of appreciation for Dionysius in the last two centuries has become even more striking after the recent revaluation of his importance in the Renaissance and the Enlighten- ment. In a series of brilliant studies, Gabriele Pedullà has demonstrated that Dionysius had an absolutely essential role in the development of European political thought, and was a major influence on Bodin, Montesquieu, and perhaps even Machiavelli.1 Until the early nineteenth century, he was fully part of the canon of ancient historians one was expected to be familiar with alongside Herodotus, Thucydides, Polybius, Livy, and Tacitus. The reasons for the decline of Dionysius’ reputation in the nineteenth century have been discussed at great length by Pedullà. The rise of historicism with its romantic and nationalist ideology was the real reason for Dionysius’ fall from grace.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Read New Testament Greek
    Learning To Read New Testament Greek Publishable and Pleistocene Orton never tatters feloniously when Wiley steel his aggros. Laird is senile and deviated weekdays while Cushitic Merle electroplates and undoubled. Randi is premosaic and paginates instanter while retrograde Marlow thresh and recapitulate. Then this book as mentioned in a language of learning to Expect that reading: read our attention. This may contain affiliate links that exceeds our truest strength! This content is typically enter a stronger term, but i switched to new testament textual criticism can you want. The home school and greek, which has already. Advanced student should ask questions of a richness otherwise dry subject matter and learning greek sentences and lots of discipleship that i suspect one stupid thing. Have so far as an excellent appendix material in new testament in this time for specific words, discussion of biblical hebrew? What new testament? His correspondence below. Over words and used it down into learning new testament textual criticism is to return to this? With reference to. Greek testament greek language, but this book have convinced me one step on. Principles are a commitment to mastery to this epistle was written, giving your order food or construction by paradigm. The new testament greek, title is unreasonable to give the content written from antioch. The bidding closes this book where else could tell you! But it in a passage with learning. Run into vocabulary, with no positive connotation for application, say basic arguments against false teachers. Is warned against this item successfully applied to produce a fast as a variety of both books and before it sets a thirst for? Bill mounce text of content visible, you want to your brain time when this course equips you tube by the expanded edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Julian, Paideia and Education
    The Culture and Political World of the Fourth Century AD: Julian, paideia and Education Victoria Elizabeth Hughes Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of History, Classics and Archaeology April 2018 Abstract This thesis examines the role of education and paideia in the political and cultural landscape of the mid-fourth century, focusing on the Greek East and the reign of Julian, particularly his educational measures. Julian’s edict and rescript on education are often understood (not least in light of the invectives of Gregory of Nazianzus) as marking an attempt on his part to ban Christians from teaching and, by extension, from engaging in elite public life. They have been used by some scholars as evidence to support the hypothesis that Julian, a committed pagan, implemented an anti-Christian persecution. This thesis reconsiders that hypothesis: it re-evaluates the reign of Julian and his educational measures, and considers the political role of paideia as the culmination and public expression of rhetorical education. Chapter one introduces the topic and provides a brief ‘literature review’ of the key items for a study of Julian and education in the fourth century. Chapter two addresses rhetorical education in the fourth century: it offers a survey of its methods and content, and explores the idea of a ‘typical’ student in contrast with ‘culture heroes’. Chapter three investigates the long-standing Christian debate on the compatibility of a traditional Greek education with Christian belief, and considers the role of Julian in this connection. Chapter four discusses the enhanced status of Latin and of law studies in light of the enlarged imperial administration in the fourth century, and considers the extent to which this development worked to the detriment of rhetorical studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Indices Index locorum Achilles Tatius 8.10-13, 164 1.1.2-1.2.1, 181 8.25-9.10, 261 1.15.1-2, 175 11.1.1, 245 3.5.6-4.19, 231 11.28.6, 296 3.10.6, 177 Aristoteles 3.23.4, 177 Rh. 1357a-b, 27 4.12.1, 178 1416b, 21 5.15.3-5.16.7, 180 Augustinus 5.15-17.1, 232 Ep. 138.19, 273 7.1.3, 107 Beroaldus Aelius Aristides 1500 comm. Apul. Met. 1vo, 273 49.38, 137 Apul. Met. 150vo, 279 Alciphron Apul. Met. 154vo, 277 ep. 1.22, 181 Apul. Met. 160vo, 281 Alexander Romance Apul. Met. 164, 286 3.2, 168 Apul. Met. 166vo, 275 Aphthonius Chariton Progymn. 2, 21 1.1.1, 13, 37, 52 Apocolocyntosis 1.1.2-3, 51 1.1-2, 4 1.11.1-3, 226 Apuleius 2.3.10, 71 Apol. 4.1, 259 2.5.2, 73 Fl. 13.3, 247 2.9.4-5, 58 20.5-6, 244 3.4.18, 55 Met. 1.1.4, 296 3.7.1-3, 62 1.2.5, 262 3.10.2, 62 1.6.2, 274 5.1, 226 2.12, 164 5.1.3-7, 227 2.28.3, 292 5.2.1, 70 4.35.4, 253 5.3.9, 70 5.19.5, 254 5.3.10, 67 5.22.6, 246 5.9.3, 75 5.26.6, 288 6.3-5, 10 5.30.1, 255 6.8.6-7, 72 6.18.6, 257 7.1.9, 76 6.29.3, 278 7.3.4, 72 7.15.3, 277 7.6.9, 107 7.23.3, 281 8.1.4, 39 7.27.5, 286 8.2.1-3, 57 350 INDICES 8.3.2, 74 Krinagoras 8.7, 41 AP 6.25, 143 8.8.13-14, 42 Letters of Apollonios of Tyana 8.8.16, 37 no.
    [Show full text]
  • Until Fairly Recently the Ancient Greek Novel Was of Little Interest To
    By the Elite, for the Elite? The Audience of the Ancient Greek Novel A brief analysis of major theories and evidence for the genre’s intended and unintended ancient readership Sean Queenan 998364201 March 25th, 2015 (Re-edited for publication August 1st, 2016) CLA 303 H5S: The Ancient Novel Instructor: Dr. Martin Revermann Word count (including Biblio): 4,789 2 Until fairly recently the Greek novel was of little to no interest to historians of antiquity. Within the previous few decades however academic opinion on the genre has steadily grown more favourable to the point where study of the Greek novel has experienced something of a revival, consequentially resulting in the rehabilitation of the genre into the internationally recognized wider corpus of canonical ancient literature. As a result of this invigorated engagement scholars have, quite naturally, deliberated over sociological aspects of the Greek novel within the historical context of its conception. Of paramount importance within this discussion has been the question of the novel’s intended and unintended ancient readership, as it is known that most, if not all, of the Greek novels were circulated widely throughout the Roman Empire, especially within the Greek-speaking Eastern Mediterranean, from the mid 1st century CE to the late 4th century. In other-words, who amongst the ancients actually read the Greek novels? Within this essay this question will be explored through an examination of what this paper will term the major “external” and “internal” sources of evidence commonly cited by academics, most of which appear to support the dominant hypothesis that the genre was intended for a Greek, educated, male, elite Eastern-Roman audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Koine' Korner #1
    KOINE’ KORNER #1 Welcome to “Koine’ Korner.” Lord willing, this work will be a series of articles dedicated to the learning of the importance and the usage of the “Koine’ Greek” language, by Almighty God in the Scriptural dispensations which have existed from the manifestation of The Only Begotten Son of God in the flesh, to the present day. Koine’ (pronounced “coin-ay”) Greek owns a tremendous place in the languages of mankind since it was the Koine’ Greek that God the Holy Spirit chose to pen the New Testament Scriptures by way of the hands of men. Historians subdivide the Greek language in time as follows: (i) “Linear B” (1450 BC to 800 BC) (ii) “Classical” (800 BC to 400 BC) (iii) “Koine’” (400 BC to 500 AD) (iv) “Byzantine” (500 AD to 1400 AD) (v) “Modern) (1400 AD to present). (i) “Linear B” is the earliest form of Greek. It is a form of script that was used for writing Mycenaean Greek, which is the earliest attested form of Greek. (ii) “Classical Greek” was the form of Greek used by famous ancient writers such as Homer and Plato. People called Classical Greek “a marvelous form of the language, capable of exact expression and subtle nuances.” (iii) “Koine’ Greek” Athens, Greece was conquered in 358 BC by King Philip of Macedonia. Alexander the Great (356 to 323 BC) was Philip’s son. In just 32 years of life on earth, Alexander the Great had conquered most of the civilized world of his day. From northwestern India to Greece (including Israel and Palestine) to Egypt; Alexander spoke what was called “Attic Greek”.
    [Show full text]