DOCSLIB.ORG

A Naval Fleet Platform Architecture for Enduring Maritime Supremacy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Naval Fleet Platform Architecture for Enduring Maritime Supremacy “To Take and Keep the Lead:” A Naval Fleet Platform Architecture for Enduring Maritime Supremacy By Robert O. Work December 2005 CONTENTS AUTHOR’S NOTE .................................................................................................................. I I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 The Enduring Race............................................................................................... 1 “…To Take and Keep the Lead”........................................................................... 1 Time to Update DoN’s Racing Strategy............................................................... 2 Scope ................................................................................................................... 4 Organization......................................................................................................... 5 II. REVIEWING THE SHIP’S LOG....................................................................................... 9 Past as Prologue .................................................................................................. 9 Identifying Previous Race Legs.................................................................... 11 The Revolutionary War, 1775-1783: Warming Up (Testing the Waters)............ 12 The Navy-Marine Corps Team: a Blissful Courtship..................................... 13 Influences on Change................................................................................... 13 The Continental Era, 1783-1889: Ready, Set, Go (Back in the Pack) ............... 14 The Navy-Marine Corps Team: An Institutional Marriage............................ 17 Influences on Change................................................................................... 17 The Oceanic, or Expeditionary, Era, 1890-1946: Racing to Win (Stalking the Leaders) ....................................................................................... 19 The Navy-Marine Corps Team: Trial Separation .......................................... 27 Influences on Change................................................................................... 28 The Transoceanic, or Garrison Era, 1947-1989: Racing to Win (Fighting off a Late Challenger)......................................................................... 29 The Rise of Guided Weapons Warfare.......................................................... 36 The Rise of an All-Volunteer Joint Force ..................................................... 39 The Fall of the “Dominant Service Model” ................................................... 40 The Navy-Marine Corps Team: Filing For Divorce........................................ 41 Influences on Change................................................................................... 45 A New National Security Era, 1989-?: Making the Turn Onto a New Race Leg.................................................................................................... 48 III. WAITING FOR THE PLOT TO SETTLE .......................................................................... 49 Been There, Done That ...................................................................................... 49 Initial DoN Course Corrections in the Joint Expeditionary Era ........................ 58 Dead in the Water .............................................................................................. 61 New Battle Force Era?....................................................................................... 62 The Navy-Marine Corps Team: Departmental Reconciliation or Irreconcilable Differences? ............................................................................... 63 External Winds of Change.................................................................................. 68 IV. “NOON SHOT” ....................................................................................................... 75 Of Maritime Supremacy and Ship Counts.......................................................... 75 First Sighting: Aggregate Fleet Warship Tonnage ............................................ 79 Second Sighting: Aviation Power-Projection Platforms.................................... 80 Third Sighting: Surface Combatants ................................................................. 84 Fourth Sighting: Submarines ............................................................................. 91 Fifth Sighting: US Fleet Striking Power............................................................. 95 Sixth Sighting: War Planning Exercises ............................................................ 96 Converting Observed Sightings Into a Relative Position in the Global Naval Competition.................................................................................. 98 Time to Reef Sails?.......................................................................................... 100 V. RACING FORECASTS FOR THE JOINT EXPEDITIONARY ERA.......................................... 103 A New Competitive Arena................................................................................ 103 Potential Challenges and Challengers ............................................................ 107 Irregular/Catastrophic Maritime Challenges.............................................. 108 Traditional/Catastrophic Challenges ......................................................... 114 Disruptive/Traditional or Disruptive/Catastrophic Challenges .................. 118 The Future Competitive Domain...................................................................... 122 Expected Future Resources ............................................................................ 123 A Future Battle Force Planning and Sizing Metric .......................................... 126 VI. RACE PREP ......................................................................................................... 129 Exploiting the Lead.......................................................................................... 129 A Strategy of the Second Move ....................................................................... 130 A Strategy of the Second Move for the Joint Expeditionary Era .................... 134 A Naval Platform Architecture Built for Rapid Adaptability ........................... 136 Battle Network Design Imperatives ................................................................ 139 Battle Network Operational Imperatives ........................................................ 141 Get Integrated ............................................................................................ 141 Get Quick.................................................................................................... 143 Get Distributed ........................................................................................... 145 Get Combined ............................................................................................. 147 Get Properly Configured, Industrially......................................................... 149 A New Battle Force Era ................................................................................... 153 Minimizing Key Sources of Friction................................................................. 155 Paralysis by Analysis.................................................................................. 155 The Navy-Marine Corps Split...................................................................... 156 “Over-specing” Battle Network Platforms ................................................. 156 Satisfying all Seven Battle Force Stakeholders ........................................ 156 Building a National Total Force Battle Network........................................ 157 Strategy in Action: Toward an Adaptable Naval Fleet Platform Architecture for the Joint Expeditionary Era .................................................. 158 A Word on “Sea Swap”..................................................................................... 160 Component Fleets............................................................................................ 161 VII. THE STRATEGIC DETERRENT AND DISSUASION FLEET................................................ 163 Strategic Ballistic Missile Submarines ........................................................... 163 Thinking About the Current and Future SSBN Fleet .................................. 164 Homeland Missile Defense ......................................................................... 166 Nuclear-Powered Attack Submarines ............................................................. 168 The US Undersea Order of Battle............................................................... 169 Recapitalizing the SSN Fleet...................................................................... 173 Quantifying US Undersea Superiority ........................................................ 175 Maintaining US Undersea Superiority Over the Long Term....................... 177 The Changing Nature of the Undersea Competition.................................. 180 Future Undersea Superiority and the Strategy of the Second Move......... 181 Recommendations for the Strategic Deterrent/Dissuasion Fleet ................... 185 Associated Annual Shipbuilding Costs ...................................................... 186 Weapons Procurement, Fleet Manning, and Other O&S Considerations ........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternative Naval Force Structure
    Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills Unmanned­Centric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org
    [Show full text]
  • Missiles OUTLOOK
    SPECIFICATIONS Missiles OUTLOOK/ GENERAL DATA AIRFRAME GUIDANCE OUTLOOK/ POWERPLANT SPECIFICATIONS MAX. MAX. SPAN, BODY LAUNCH MAX. RANGE STATUS/OUTLOOK/REMARKS DESIGNATION/NAME LENGTH WINGS OR DIAMETER WEIGHT CONTRACTOR TYPE NO. MAKE & MODEL (FT.) FINS (FT.) (FT.) (LB.) (NAUT. MI.) AIR-TO-AIR CHUNG-SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CSIST), Taoyuan, Taiwan Skysword 1 (Tien Chien 1) 9.8 2.1 0.42 196.4 — IR 1 X solid propellant 9.7 In service with Taiwan air force since 1993. Skysword 2 (Tien Chien 2) 11.8 2 0.62 396.8 — Active radar 1 X solid propellant 32.4 In service with Taiwan air force since 1996. DENEL (PTY.) LTD., Pretoria, South Africa OPERATORS SATELLITE A-Darter 9.8 1.6 0.54 195.8 Denel IIR 1 X solid propellant — Fifth-generation technology demonstrator. Likely co-development with Brazil. COMMERCIAL R-Darter 11.9 2.1 0.53 264 Denel Radar 1 X solid propellant — Development completed 2000. For South African Air Force Cheetah and Gripen aircraft. U-Darter 9.6 1.67 0.42 210 Denel Two-color, IR 1 X solid propellant — First revealed in 1988; similar to Magic. Entered production in 1994. In use on South African Air Force Cheetah and Impala aircraft. DIEHL BGT DEFENSE, Uberlingen, Germany COMMERCIAL AIM-9L/I-1 Sidewinder 9.4 2.1 0.4 189 Diehl BGT Defense IR 1 X solid propellant — Upgraded and refurbished. IRIS-T 9.7 — 0.4 196 Diehl BGT Defense IIR 1 X solid propellant — In production. SATELLITE OPERATORS SATELLITE MBDA MISSILE SYSTEMS (BAE Systems, EADS, Finmeccanica), London, UK; Vélizy, France; Rome, Italy Aspide 12.1 3.4 0.67 479 Alenia Semiactive radar, homing 1 X solid propellant 43 In service.
    [Show full text]
  • Fellow Submarines by Jan Joel Andersson
    32 2016 AL E X A ND E RZ E ML IA N ic H E NKO/AP/SIPA Fellow submarines by Jan Joel Andersson Ever since the occupation of Crimea in 2014, commercial, and military transport. Moreover, Russian military activity has increased in and the growing importance of secure maritime bor- around Europe. Russian air and land exercises have ders and the protection of vital undersea global also become more assertive and frequent compared communication cables make it both prudent and to previous years. Fighter jets of the Swedish and necessary for Europe to collectively manage, de- Finnish air forces, as well as NATO fighters pro- ter, and counter any undersea provocations. tecting the air space of the three Baltic republics of Countering enemy submarines is, however, very Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are scrambled on a difficult, time consuming and costly as the best regular basis to intercept approaching Russian air- underwater defences are submarines themselves. craft. Similarly, the Russian navy has stepped up its operations and engages in naval exercises and Complex and competitive deployments of increasing scope and scale. Containing more parts than jet airliners and be- Perhaps most worryingly to Western observers is ing more complicated than surface vessels, sub- the increase in underwater activity in the Baltic marines can be compared to space ships in their Sea and North Atlantic: senior NATO naval com- complexity. There are only a handful of companies manders have confirmed that “Russian submarine in the world capable of designing advanced sub- activity is reaching levels unseen since the end of marines and the majority of them are European.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENT's MUSINGS OCTOBER 2015 Many of Us Attended The
    PRESIDENT'S MUSINGS OCTOBER 2015 Many of us attended the Navy Ball at the Atrium Flemington Racecourse on October 17th, and the consensus is that it was a splendid occasion. Our congratulations go to the organising committee for a job well done. Personally I had a great time! Traditionally we have 'Show and Tell' as part of our AGM and we urge you to check out that trunk in the attic and share your treasures with your friends, who are sure to believe everything you tell them about it! Show and tell is a lot of fun and we are sure to share a few laughs together, as always! Rex's Odyssey – Part 1: My son, David, is working in Manila and so my trip, over two months, really started and ended in the Philippines. It was really great to catch up with the Williams family and be with them for a couple of weeks sharing their new environment. I'd like to also share with you my time at the American Cemetery in Manila and my day trip to Corregidor Island. The American Cemetery and Memorial is set on 152 acres, and burials number 17,201 most of who lost their lives in operations in the New Guinea and Philippines area. The headstones are aligned in 11 plots forming a generally circular pattern, set amongst lush lawns and beautiful trees white and shrubs. It is indeed a beautiful resting place which is maintained to perfection. The chapel building is situated near the centre of the complex and in front of it on a wide terrace are two large hemicycles containing 25 mosaic maps recalling the achievements of America and her allies in the Pacific, Chinese Indian and Burmese theatres during WWII.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heroic Destroyer and "Lucky" Ship O.R.P. "Blyskawica"
    Transactions on the Built Environment vol 65, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 The heroic destroyer and "lucky" ship O.R.P. "Blyskawica" A. Komorowski & A. Wojcik Naval University of Gdynia, Poland Abstract The destroyer O.R.P. "Blyskawica" is a precious national relic, the only remaining ship that was built before World War I1 (WW2). On the 5oth Anniversary of its service under the Polish flag, it was honoured with the highest military decoration - the Gold Cross of the Virtuti Militari Medal. It has been the only such case in the whole history of the Polish Navy. Its our national hero, war-veteran and very "lucky" warship. "Blyskawica" took part in almost every important operation in Europe throughout WW2. It sailed and covered the Baltic Sea, North Sea, all the area around Great Britain, the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. During the war "Blyskawica" covered a distance of 148 thousand miles, guarded 83 convoys, carried out 108 operational patrols, participated in sinking two warships, damaged three submarines and certainly shot down four war-planes and quite probably three more. It was seriously damaged three times as a result of operational action. The crew casualties aggregated to a total of only 5 killed and 48 wounded petty officers and seamen, so it was a very "lucky" ship during WW2. In July 1947 the ship came back to Gdynia in Poland and started training activities. Having undergone rearmament and had a general overhaul, it became an anti-aircraft defence ship. In 1976 it replaced O.R.P. "Burza" as a Museum-Ship.
    [Show full text]
  • Submarines in the United States Navy - Wikipedia Page 1 of 13
    Submarines in the United States Navy - Wikipedia Page 1 of 13 Submarines in the United States Navy There are three major types of submarines in the United States Navy: ballistic missile submarines, attack submarines, and cruise missile submarines. All submarines in the U.S. Navy are nuclear-powered. Ballistic subs have a single strategic mission of carrying nuclear submarine-launched ballistic missiles. Attack submarines have several tactical missions, including sinking ships and subs, launching cruise missiles, and gathering intelligence. The submarine has a long history in the United States, beginning with the Turtle, the world's first submersible with a documented record of use in combat.[1] Contents Early History (1775–1914) World War I and the inter-war years (1914–1941) World War II (1941–1945) Offensive against Japanese merchant shipping and Japanese war ships Lifeguard League Cold War (1945–1991) Towards the "Nuclear Navy" Strategic deterrence Post–Cold War (1991–present) Composition of the current force Fast attack submarines Ballistic and guided missile submarines Personnel Training Pressure training Escape training Traditions Insignia Submarines Insignia Other insignia Unofficial insignia Submarine verse of the Navy Hymn See also External links References https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarines_in_the_United_States_Navy 3/24/2018 Submarines in the United States Navy - Wikipedia Page 2 of 13 Early History (1775–1914) There were various submersible projects in the 1800s. Alligator was a US Navy submarine that was never commissioned. She was being towed to South Carolina to be used in taking Charleston, but she was lost due to bad weather 2 April 1863 off Cape Hatteras, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's S-400 Dilemma
    EDAM Foreign Policy and Security Paper Series 2017/5 Turkey’s S-400 Dilemma July, 2017 Dr. Can Kasapoglu Defense Analyst, EDAM 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • This report’s core military assessment of a possible • In fact, modern air defense concepts vary between S-400 deal concludes that Ankara’s immediate aim is fighter aircraft-dominant postures, SAM-dominant to procure the system primarily for air defense missi- postures, and balanced force structures. However, if ons as a surface-to-air missile (SAM) asset, rather than Ankara is to replace its fighter aircraft-dominant con- performing ballistic missile defense (BMD) functions. cept with a SAM and aircraft mixed understanding, This priority largely stems from the Turkish Air Force’s which could be an effective alternative indeed, then currently low pilot-to-cockpit ratio (0.8:1 by open- it has to maintain utmost interoperability within its source 2016 estimates). Thus, even if the procurement principal arsenal. Key importance of interoperability is to be realized, Turkey will first and foremost operate between aircraft and integrated air and missile defense the S-400s as a stopgap measure to augment its air systems can be better understood by examining the superiority calculus over geo-strategically crucial areas. Israeli Air Force’s (IAF) recent encounter in the Syrian This is why the delivery time remains a key condition. airspace. On March 17, 2017, a Syrian S-200 (SA-5) battery fired an anti-aircraft missile to hunt down an • Although it is not a combat-tested system, not only IAF fixed-wing aircraft (probably an F-15 or F-16 Russian sources but also many Western military variant).
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Draft DSCTC Report
    DEFENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE (DSC) Sub-Committee on Transatlantic Defence and Security Cooperation (DSCTC) EVOLVING SECURITY IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC Draft Report by Nicholas SOAMES (United Kingdom) Rapporteur 077 DSCTC 19 E | Original: English | 23 April 2019 Until this document has been adopted by the Defence and Security Committee, it only represents the views of the Rapporteur. 077 DSCTC 19 E TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 2 II. IMPORTANCE OF THE ATLANTIC ....................................................................................... 2 III. THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF THE GIUK-N GAP AND NEW RUSSIAN PRESENCE AND CAPABILITIES .............................................................................................................. 3 A. INCREASED RUSSIAN CAPABILITIES AND PRESENCE........................................... 3 B. RUSSIA IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC AND ARCTIC ..................................................... 4 C. THE NORTHERN FLEET AND RUSSIAN DEFENCE ARCHITECTURE IN THE ATLANTIC .................................................................................................................... 5 IV. NATO’S NORTH ATLANTIC PRESENCE AND NEW INITIATIVES ....................................... 5 A. NATO MARITIME COMMAND ...................................................................................... 6 B. ICELAND AND RENEWED NATO ANTI-SUBMARINE EFFORTS ............................... 7 V. INTERIM
    [Show full text]
  • Airshows in California
    Airshows In California If you like to watch cool airplanes fly around, there is hardly a better state to live in than beautiful California. The great weather has made our state home to many air bases and to many passionate private owners of interesting aircraft. All the crop-dusting that goes on in the Central Valley produces many a fine aerobat. Nasa's Ames Research Center, right in Silicon Valley, has been at the leading edge of fluid dynamics studies for a while (they have the largest wind tunnel in the world). Also, much of the USAF's recon units are not too far from there, in the Sacramento area. Heading south, Lemoore is one of the US Navy's biggest fighter-jet bases. Further south; the LA area headquarters Northrop Grumman and AeronVironment and is home to some Boeing and Lockheed facilities, not to mention Vandenberg's rocket launchpads. And finally, the importance of Southern California's Antelope Valley to the development and testing of modern aviation technologies cannot be overstated, from Edwards Air Force Base and the Nasa Dryden Flight Research Center (where the sound barrier was first broken and where proof-of-concept X-planes still fly) to all the prototyping/testing facilities at Palmdale and the home of Scaled Composites in Mojave. So if you like aviation, there are few places you'd rather be at than California. And where there are a lot of people making aviation happen... there are airshows. If you live in California and think you might enjoy going to an airshow, here are some you can pick from.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Reagan National Defense Forum Reinvesting in Peace Through Strength
    REAGAN NATIONAL DEFENSE FORUM REINVESTING IN PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH DECEMBER 1 - 2, 2017 THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY SIMI VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Confirmed Speakers and Guests Subject to change Mr. Mark Aslett The Honorable Eric Edelman Lt. General Samuel Greaves His Excellency Rollandas Krišcˇiu¯ nas Senator Jerry Moran Senator Jack Reed Mr. Michael T. Strianese Congressman Joe Wilson President and CEO, Mercury Systems Former Under Secretary of Defense (Policy); Director, Missile Defense Agency Ambassador of Lithuania to the United States U.S. Senate, Kansas U.S. Senate, Rhode Island Chairman and CEO, L3 Technologies U.S. House of Representatives, South Carolina Former Ambassador to Turkey and Finland 2017 Peace Through Strength Recipient Mr. Bret Baier Mr. Lee Greenwood Mr. Roger Krone Mr. Orie Mullen Congressman Mac Thornberry The Honorable Pete Wilson Chief Political Anchor, Fox News Senator Joni Ernst Musical Artist CEO, Leidos President, Humana Military Ms. Trish Regan Chairman, House Armed Services Committee; Former Governor, California; RRPFI Trustee U.S. Senate, Iowa Host, Fox Business Network U.S. House of Representatives, Texas Congressman Jim Banks Ms. Jennifer Griffin Congressman Jim Langevin Congresswoman Stephanie Murphy Congressman Steve Womack U.S. House of Representatives, Indiana The Right Honourable Michael Fallon MP National Security Correspondent, Fox News U.S. House of Representatives, Rhode Island U.S. House of Representatives, Florida Admiral Michael S. Rogers Mr. Chris Wallace U.S. House of Representatives, Arkansas British Secretary of Defence Commander, U.S. Cyber Command; Host, Fox News Sunday Mr. Julian Barnes Ms. Marillyn Hewson His Excellency Lauri Lepik General Robert B. Neller Director, National Security Agency; The Honorable Dov Zakheim European Security Reporter, The Wall Street Journal Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archive of American Journalism Ray Stannard Baker Collection
    The Archive of American Journalism Ray Stannard Baker Collection McClure’s Magazine September, 1898 How the News of the War is Reported WAR with Spain began, so far as the newspapers were concerned, when the “Maine” was blown up in Havana harbor. The explosion occurred at 9.40 o’clock on the evening of February 15, 1898. At half-past two on the following morning the first reports, filed by the correspondents in Havana, reached New York, and at daylight newsboys in every city in America were crying the extras which gave the details of the disaster. Before noon on the 16th, a tug steamed out of the harbor at Key West with three divers on board. In the few hurried hours after the news reached New York “The World” had telegraphed its representative in Key West, and divers had been roused out of bed, had collected their paraphernalia, and had embarked on the newly chartered tug for Havana. Early in the afternoon, “The World” correspondent in Havana received the following cabled instructions: “Have sent divers to you from Key West to get actual truth, whether favorable or unfavorable. First investigation by divers, with authentic results, worth $1,000 extra expense tomorrow alone.” But when the divers arrived, they were not allowed to make a descent, and all that the newspaper sponsors of the enterprise derived from the expedition was a bill of expense amounting to nearly $1,000. This was the beginning. During the next few days scores of correspondents were rushed into Havana, and half a hundred great newspapers began to fill with news and pictures of the wreck.
    [Show full text]