DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Payment Systems Partnership Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Payment Systems Partnership Action Plan Regional Payment Systems Partnership Action Plan September 25, 2000 Vollpe Natiionall Transportatiion Systems Center Regional Payment Systems Partnership: Phase I Action Plan Virginia Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................................1 2 Context...........................................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Regional Electronic Payment Systems Coordination.........................................................................5 2.1.1 General Concept............................................................................................................................5 2.1.2 Contactless Card Standards and Interoperability........................................................................9 2.1.2.1 Types of Cards and Standards .................................................................................................9 2.1.2.2 System Interoperability..........................................................................................................10 2.1.3 Benefits........................................................................................................................................10 2.1.3.1 Increasing Customer Convenience........................................................................................10 2.1.3.2 Improve Operational Efficiency............................................................................................11 2.1.3.3 Reduce Costs...........................................................................................................................11 2.1.4 Opportunities...............................................................................................................................12 2.1.4.1 Start Creating the Regional Vision........................................................................................12 2.1.4.2 Explore Partnerships...............................................................................................................12 2.1.5 Potential Participants..................................................................................................................13 2.1.5.1 Within Transit Community....................................................................................................15 2.1.5.2 Within Regional Transportation Community.......................................................................18 2.1.5.3 Transportation Community Within the Southern I-95 Corridor..........................................20 2.1.5.4 Beyond Transportation...........................................................................................................20 2.2 Current Revenue Initiatives and Opportunities for Enhancements..................................................21 2.2.1 Core Regional Transit.................................................................................................................21 2.2.1.1 WMATA.................................................................................................................................21 2.2.1.1.1 SmarTrip...........................................................................................................................22 2.2.1.1.2 Metrochek.........................................................................................................................23 2.2.1.1.3 SmarTrip Expansion.........................................................................................................24 2.2.1.2 Commuter Rail........................................................................................................................25 2.2.1.2.1 MARC...............................................................................................................................26 2.2.1.2.2 VRE...................................................................................................................................26 2.2.1.3 Local Bus ................................................................................................................................27 2.2.1.4 Dulles Corridor Transit..........................................................................................................28 2.2.2 Regional Transportation.............................................................................................................28 2.2.2.1 Tolls.........................................................................................................................................28 2.2.2.2 Parking ....................................................................................................................................29 2.2.2.2.1 DC TransPass...................................................................................................................29 2.2.2.2.2 Airport Parking.................................................................................................................30 2.2.2.2.3 Park and Ride....................................................................................................................30 2.2.2.3 SmartAccess Project Team ....................................................................................................31 2.2.2.4 Paratransit................................................................................................................................32 2.2.2.5 Taxi and Airport Ground Transportation..............................................................................33 2.2.3 Southern I-95 Corridor...............................................................................................................34 2.2.3.1 Amtrak.....................................................................................................................................34 2.2.3.2 Other Regions.........................................................................................................................35 2.2.3.2.1 “Greater” Washington Region.........................................................................................35 2.2.3.2.2 Philadelphia/Wilmington.................................................................................................35 2.2.3.2.3 New Jersey/New York City.............................................................................................35 2.2.3.2.4 E-ZPass.............................................................................................................................36 2.2.3.3 Beyond Transportation...........................................................................................................38 2.2.3.3.1 Federal Government Employees.....................................................................................38 2.2.3.3.2 Financial Institutions........................................................................................................38 3 Market Segments.........................................................................................................................................41 3.1 Importance...........................................................................................................................................41 3.2 Market Segments Based on Trip Purpose..........................................................................................41 September 25, 2000 Page i Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Regional Payment Systems Partnership: Phase I Action Plan Table of Contents Virginia Department of Transportation 3.2.1 Frequent.......................................................................................................................................41 3.2.1.1 Commuters..............................................................................................................................41 3.2.1.1.1 “Choice” Transit Commuters ..........................................................................................41 3.2.1.1.2 “Captive” Commuters......................................................................................................42 3.2.1.2 Non-Commuters .....................................................................................................................42 3.2.1.3 Students...................................................................................................................................42 3.2.2 Occasional...................................................................................................................................42 3.2.2.1 Shopping/Entertainment.........................................................................................................42 3.2.2.2 Tourist.....................................................................................................................................43 3.2.2.3 Business Travelers..................................................................................................................43 3.2.3 Target Market Segments for Participation in Regional Programs...........................................43 3.3 Market Segmentation Based on WMATA Market Research...........................................................44 3.3.1 Service Area and Travel Profile.................................................................................................44 3.3.2 Transit Rider Characteristics......................................................................................................44
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuterdirect.Com for Pricing)
    Rvsd 7/21 Annapolis EFFECTIVE JUNE 27, Fares 2021 Governor Ritchie Highway For more information, or to request From Davidsonville to Washington, D.C. is Zone 3; from Kent LEGEND • College Parkway this document in an alternate format or Island to Washington D.C. is Zone 4. 250 Line Bus Stop translated into another language, please Zone 3 Zone 4 Park & Ride One Way – Full Fare $6.00 $7.00 301 50 contact the department listed below. d One Way – Senior/Disability Fare $5.00 $6.00 ’s Roa ret Ten Trip – Full Fare $60.00 $70.00 arga M t. Ten Trip – Senior/Disability $50.00 $60.00 G S Para mayor información o para solicitar en 301 250 e Monthly Pass Full Fare $204.00 $238.00 ral 450 s H este documento en un formato alternativo o ig 50 179 h Monthly Pass – Senior/Disability $170.00 $204.00 w a Romancoke Road y 2 traducido a otro idioma, por favor contacte el Transit Link Card (refer to commuterdirect.com for pricing) 178 70 Rowe Boulevard 648 450 departamento enlistado abajo. • Commuter Bus Ticket Sales COMMUTER BUS To Washington Rowe Boulevard 450 Commuter Direct MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION via Davidsonville P&R 2 Website: MTA.CommuterDirect.com DAVIDSONVILLE 301 50 W 70 Phone: 410-697-2212 es 50 欲了解更多信息或欲索取另一种格 450 t Str 301 450 Main Street Kent Narrows 2 eet ad 665 Park & Ride Charm Pass (mobile ticket) KENT ISLAND AND Ro lvd 8 iva Aris T B R Stevensville M 式或译成其它语言的本文档， Website: mta.maryland.gov/charmpass ain Str d Park & Ride ee TO WASHINGTON, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore City
    November 2007 BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2. Table of Contents - TO2035 FiI I 12/12/2007 9:34:38 AM This page left blank intentionally. 2. Table of Contents - TO2035 FiII II 12/12/2007 9:34:49 AM Table of Contents | Transportation Outlook 2035 Table of Contents Executive Summary What is Transportation Outlook 2035? ..................................................................................... iii Introduction, Section 1 Planning Process For Transportation Outlook 2035 ..............................iv Introduction, Section 2 Will Transportation Outlook 2035 Be Successful? ...............................vii Introduction, Section 3 Addressing the Funding Shortfall ......................................................ix Chapter One Transportation Planning in the Baltimore Region ........................................................................3 Chapter 1, Section 1 The Baltimore Regional Transportation Board ......................................4 Chapter 1, Section 2 Metropolitan Planning Area .............................................................5 Chapter 1, Section 3 SAFETEA-LU ...............................................................................6 Chapter 1, Section 4 Regional Transportation Planning Process ...........................................9 Chapter 1, Section 5 Goals, Strategies, and Supporting Actions ......................................... 14 Baltimore Regional Transportation Board I 2. Table of Contents - TO2035 FiSec1:I Sec1:I 12/12/2007 9:34:49 AM TRANSPORTATION OUTLOOK 2035
    [Show full text]
  • Commuterdirect.Com for Pricing) Bus Stop • Commuter Bus Ticket Sales COMMUTER BUS Annapolis Departamento Enlistado Abajo
    To Severna Park Rvsd 7/21 Annapolis Fares EFFECTIVE JUNE 27, For more information, or to request • From Kent Island to Washington, D.C. is Zone 4; from Annapolis and 2021 this document in an alternate format or Davidsonville to Washington, D.C. is Zone 3. Zone 3 Zone 4 translated into another language, please One Way – Full Fare $6.00 $7.00 301 contact the department listed below. One Way – Senior/Disability Fare $5.00 $6.00 50 Ten Trip – Full Fare $60.00 $70.00 Ten Trip – Senior/Disability $50.00 $60.00 Para mayor información o para solicitar LEGEND Monthly Pass Full Fare $204.00 $238.00 220 No. 220 Route este documento en un formato alternativo o Monthly Pass – Senior/Disability $170.00 $204.00 Midday/last PM trip traducido a otro idioma, por favor contacte el Transit Link Card (refer to commuterdirect.com for pricing) Bus Stop • Commuter Bus Ticket Sales COMMUTER BUS Annapolis departamento enlistado abajo. Park & Ride 2 Commuter Direct 15th St. MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 4th St. U St. 7th St. U St. Website: MTA.CommuterDirect.com 70 U St. TO 70 Downtown Washington, D.C. Phone: 410-697-2212 9th St. Downtown Washington, D.C. 14th St. 13th St. 3rd St. 2nd St. 11th St. 9th St. 欲了解更多信息或欲索取另一种格 12th St. 12th St. T St. 178 Bestgate Rd. Charm Pass (mobile ticket) ANNAPOLIS T St. Website: mta.maryland.gov/charmpass General's Hwy. 2 式或译成其它语言的本文档， WASHINGTON, D.C. Florida Ave. To Kent Island Phone: 833-242-7622 8th St. New Hampshire Ave. 16th St.
    [Show full text]
  • History of MDOT MTA and the Lots System
    History of Transit Organization in the Baltimore Region Transit Agencies and Service Development in the Baltimore Region OVERVIEW The Baltimore Regional Transit Governance and Funding Study will develop alternatives for how the region could structure, organize, and fund regional transit services. The approach to developing these alternatives includes working with the Baltimore Regional Transit Board (BRTB) through an iterative process of research, analysis, and stakeholder input to ensure that the alternatives are grounded in experience, respectful of history and constraints, but creative enough to recognize opportunities. This technical memo, the first in the series, focuses on the history and development of transit services in the Baltimore Region. The first step involves focusing on the history and development of transit Image from Creative Commons: ETLamborghini services in the Baltimore region to understand how the existing service network came to be and provides the context for why some regional services are operated by the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) and others by Locally Operated Transit Systems (LOTS). Our goal is that by understanding the historical perspective, we will understand the transit network, its origins and evolution and its current form. The overview and historical perspective include the development and evolution of: • State leadership for local transit services in the City of Baltimore. • State leadership for regional transit services, including the MARC commuter rail system and the Commuter Bus program. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | KFH Group | KPMG | Tamar Henkin 1 History of Transit Organization in the Baltimore Region • County leadership for local services in the counties surrounding Baltimore through the Locally Operated Transit System (LOTS) program.
    [Show full text]
  • Annapolis Transit Development Plan 2018 I
    Annapolis Transit Transit Development Plan DRAFT REPORT December 2018 Prepared for Annapolis Transit, City of Annapolis, Maryland Prepared by KFH Group, Inc. Bethesda, Maryland Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1: Review of Existing Services Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 Annapolis Transit Services ............................................................................................ 1-2 Funding and Fare Policy ................................................................................................ 1-21 Service Performance Evaluation ................................................................................... 1-25 Existing Facilities, Fleet, and Technology ...................................................................... 1-37 Marketing and Communications .................................................................................... 1-44 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access ...................................................................................... 1-45 Other Area Transportation Providers ............................................................................. 1-48 Chapter 2: Review of Transit Needs Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2-1 Demographics and Land Use ........................................................................................ 2-1 Stakeholder and Public Input ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Arundel County Transportation Center Feasibility Study
    Anne Arundel County Transportation Center Feasibility Study January 2020 Anne Arundel County Transportation Center Feasibility Study January 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 Existing Service and Previous Studies ................................................................................. 4 3.1 AAOT ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Annapolis Transit .............................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Regional Transportation Agency (RTA) Existing Service .................................................. 8 3.3 Other Transit Services .....................................................................................................10 3.4 MDOT MTA .....................................................................................................................10 3.4.1 MDOT MTA LocalLink 67: Marley Neck (Energy Parkway) to Downtown (City Hall) ..11 3.4.2 MDOT MTA LocalLink 69/70: Patapsco Light Rail Station to Annapolis/Jumpers Hole .......................................................................................................................................12 3.4.3 MDOT MTA LocalLink 75: Patapsco
    [Show full text]
  • Charles County Vango Transit Development Plan
    Charles County VanGO Transit Development Plan Final Report January 2019 Charles County Maryland Transit Development Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction Background ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Transit Development Plan Advisory Committee ................................................................................ 1-1 Overview of the Plan .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 Chapter 2: Review of Existing Conditions Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 2-1 VanGO Services .................................................................................................................................. 2-1 Ridership Data .................................................................................................................................... 2-4 Operating and Performance Data ...................................................................................................... 2-5 VanGO Route Profiles ........................................................................................................................ 2-6 System Performance .......................................................................................................................... 2-22 VanGO Fare Structure .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Transportation (PDF)
    Annapolis Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4 - Transportation CHAPTER 4: TRANSPORTATION Introduction Annapolis seeks to enhance mobility and accessibility within the city by advancing realistic and achievable land use concepts and transportation strategies. This Plan calls for a fundamental shift in transportation planning and development. The City’s efforts to improve mobility and accessibility will mean that automobile use in the city cannot be allowed to grow as a percent of total trip making. While this is a city transportation plan, it is informed by and takes into account West Street development and traffic trends outside of Annapolis that have a bearing on the city. Primary Challenges In past decades while there was still a net outflow of commuters from the city to distant work locations, incremental highway expansions were seen as reasonable solutions to the problem of peak-period congestion.6 Not any longer. Indeed the nature of the problem has changed. Today, there is a net inflow of workers and visitors each day. Transportation The movement of people and goods throughout the city and to and from the growing residential and shopping areas adjacent to the city is also now extensive. Special events to which the City plays host also add to congestion and parking problems at certain times of the year. All of this is complicated by geography and the fact that access to and from the regional highway system is confined to only a few routes. The area highway system is operating at or near its capacity, so even minor disruptions (e.g. an accident) can cause gridlock on the network of streets and highways serving the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Governance and Funding Study Technical Memorandum #2 Existing Structure and Services
    Baltimore Regional Transit Governance and Funding Study Technical Memorandum #2 Existing Structure and Services February 2021 Existing Structure and Services Table of Contents Page Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Overview of Transit Governance / Current Structure in Baltimore Region ....................... 2 Regional Transit Services ............................................................................................. 12 Implications for developing Transit Governance and funding alternatives ..................... 24 Table of Figures Page Figure 1 CTP Development Process ......................................................................... 4 Figure 2 Overview of MDOT MTA ............................................................................. 7 Figure 3 Locally Operated Transit Systems (LOTS) Organizational Structures ....... 10 Figure 4 Baltimore Region Population Growth Rates (2010-2019) .......................... 13 Figure 5 Baltimore Region Median Household Income by County (2019) ............... 14 Figure 6 Baltimore Region Minority Population by County (2019) ........................... 15 Figure 7 Existing Transit Services – MDOT/MDOT MTA and Locally Operating Transit Systems (LOTS) ............................................... 17 Figure 8 MDOT MTA Transit Operating Funds (2019) ........................................... 18 Figure 9 MDOT MTA and LOTS Operating Funding by Source (2019) ................... 18 Figure
    [Show full text]
  • Commuter Bus Site
    MARC Train / Commuter Bus & Other Connecting Commuter Service 70 HAGERSTOWN APPROXIMATE SCALE OF MAP 83 0 5 10 Mi 1 CECIL 140 CHURCHVILLE COUNTY MVA 991 To 0 5 10 Km Wilmington HC WESTMINSTER HICKORY 25 BYPASS 95 MARYWOOD BEL 410 HARFORD 31 AIR 420 PERRRYVILLE 75 412 COUNTY HAVRE DE 30 136 550 GRACE 40 15 140 411 MVA HUNT VALLEY HC 70 152 410 17 FREDERICK HUNT VALLEY 412 ABERDEEN COUNTY FALLSTON 420 991 24 25 45 411 BALTIMORE 83 MARTINSBURG CARROLL E WASHINGTON TIMONIUM COUNTY LIN COUNTY 1 NN COUNTY PE 40 795 40 95 B FREDERICK R 32 U 480 27 N OWINGS MILLS CROMWELL WHITE S EDGEWOOD W 70 BRIDGE MARSH 420 I 40 C 695 K TOWSON HC L 15 MONOCACY IN 120 E BALTIMORE 410 DUFFIELDS 104 411 160 340 991 83 BALTIMORE BALTIMORE 412 40 OLIVER 9 E BEACH TransIT LI N N COUNTY CITY 420 K I O 1 IC S 695 MARTIN STATE AIRPORT HARPERS FERRY EN W T URBANA BRUNSWICK S X Glen L 15 N E HC RU PENN STA B CK ELLICOTT 95 160 Martin RI 70 State DE CITY W BALTIMORE FRE 150 150 JOHNS HOPKINS HOSP 160 Airport HOWARD 40 CAMDEN CAMDEN YARDS 915 HT 150 DUNDALK ESSEX POINT OF ROCKS COUNTY 310 410 160 120 695 BR 270 29 UN 310 SOUTHWEST 311 420 412 411 SW HT LONG GATE 311 320 P ICK 320 a L HALETHORPE t I 915 150 a 15 N 991 124 p E HT s DICKERSON 929 ST DENIS c 340 32 995 o 108 LINTHICUM KENT BARNESVILLE 915 CTC 929 310 CLARKSVILLE 995 100 COUNTY HT 310 311 320 695 BOYDS 97 COLUMBIA 311 CTC BWI AIRPORT R 915 929 175 BWI Marshall Airport iv SNOWDEN RIVER e GERMANTOWN 995 DORSEY BWI AIRPORT r 97 95 CROMWELL STATION /GLEN BURNIE METROPOLITAN GROVE 29 BROKEN HT LAND CTC CTC SCAGGSVILLE
    [Show full text]