DOCSLIB.ORG

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #8 Review of Key Corridors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #8 Review of Key Corridors TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #8 Review of Key Corridors Prepared for the Anne Arundel County Office of Transportation May 2019 – Final Note: The purpose of each Technical Memorandum prepared for the Office of Transportation is to present facts, analysis, ideas, issues and recommendations that will inform the Anne Arundel County Transportation Master Plan. The views expressed and recommendations offered in each memorandum are solely based on the consultant’s judgment and should not be considered as endorsed by the Office of Transportation or any other County agency or officer. Technical Memorandum #8: Review of Key Corridors Page 2 A summary of travel demand, planning gaps and conflicts, existing conditions and potential projects among all modes was prepared for each state-owned roadway considered in the Transportation Functional Master Plan; county-owned roadways had much less data to be considered in formulating recommendations for the plan. These summaries were one input into the analysis performed in creating the plan’s final recommendations. Readers must understand the context for these summaries. As published in this technical memorandum, draft documents were prepared for discussion purposes among the project team but were not updated following team discussion. Any information used in these summaries must be verified prior to use. Technical Memorandum #8: Review of Key Corridors Page 3 Travel Demand Forecasting Since the 2009 General Development Plan, the expansion of housing development has been rapid outside of future major job centers, such as BWI, Fort Meade, Brooklyn Park, and the University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center. This corresponds to Ferndale, Pumphrey, Severn, and Pasadena, along the I-97 travel shed, with buffers of low growth in the immediate area adjacent to major roads. Immediately south of the University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center is the site of new senior housing, with condominiums currently under construction. Population is expected to outpace previous forecasts with the influx of employment opportunities throughout the travel shed. Table 1: Comparison of CGMP Forecasts Employment Population Housing I-97: I-97: I-97: Forecasted Employment Growth Forecasted Population Growth Forecasted Household Growth 2009 - 2040 2009 - 2040 2009 - 2040 Corridor Corridor Corridor I-97 I-97 I-97 Forecasted Growth Forecasted Growth Forecasted Growth 0% - 5% 0% - 5% 0% - 5% 6% - 15% 6% - 15% 6% - 15% 16% - 25% 16% - 25% 16% - 25% 26% - 50% 26% - 50% 26% - 50% 0 1 2 Miles 0 1 2 Miles 0 1 2 Miles > 50% ¯ > 50% ¯ > 50% ¯ Recent and Committed Projects » There have been no capacity improvements along I-97 TFMP Candidate Roadway Roadway Projects Project Locations Project Status Cost Estimate Widen I-97 from 4 No to 6 lanes between action $283,300,000 US 50 to MD 32 planned Interchange No improvements at action N/A US 50 planned No New interchange action N/A near Crownsville planned Widen I-97 from 6 No to 8 lanes from MD action $321,000,000 32 to I-695 planned Planning Gaps & Conflicts Recommendations Highway Highway » The widening of I-97 is consistently noted among the plans reviewed, » Along I-97, the high priority but the project is not included in the Baltimore Region Constrained Long improvement is capacity, systems Range Transportation Plan. management and operations » The County’s targeted growth area at the former state hospital complex improvements from MD 32 to US in Crownsville may require regional access via I-97, but no improvements 50. are identified in any of the plans reviewed. » Further study is required of regional » There are ongoing discussions of interchange improvements or access to the Crownsville area. transportation systems management/operations (TSMO) strategies at I-97. » SHA’s Annual Mobility Report shows significant congestion and delay at the junction of I-97 and MD 32, primarily in the southbound to eastbound direction. Transit Transit » Today in the I-97 corridor MTA provides: » MTA should increase the level of ◦ Three express trips daily between downtown Baltimore and downtown express service along I-97 between Annapolis via Cromwell Light Rail Station (Route 215). Annapolis and Baltimore; additional ◦ Three express bus trips from Kent Island to downtown Baltimore via study is required on specific Annapolis with two additional trips originating in Annapolis (Route 210). destinations within Baltimore City, » The Central Light Rail Line’s Cromwell Station is the southernmost stop where the high-growth Boston and serves trips from I-97 to downtown Baltimore and to the north. The Street corridor is unserved and Harry S. Truman Park and Ride is located at near the junction of I-97 and connectivity north to State Center US 50 at Riva Road. and Penn Station could be » The Corridor Growth Management Plan recommends adding premium warranted. bus service from Parole Town Center to BWI Airport and Arundel Mills. » The Transit Development Plan recommends makes no specific recommendations for transit service in the I-97 corridor. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Bicycle and Pedestrian » Bicycle traffic is not permitted on access-controlled freeways and Facilities interstate highways, unless it is located on an approved adjacent path » Advance the bicycle and pedestrian or facility. As such, parallel routes should be explored. The Bicycle facility recommendations in and Pedestrian Master Plan contains recommendations along MD 178 coordination with land use changes (Generals Highway) to MD 450 (Defense Highway), and West Street at the former Crownsville state continues the corridor into Annapolis. hospital. » Pedestrian and bicycle improvements on MD 178 are recommended from Knollwood Drive to the Annapolis city line. Intersection improvements are recommended at the intersection of Housley Road, Bestgate Road, and MD 178. » Recommendations: » Use existing wide shoulders and right-of-way on MD 178 between West Street and Knollwood Drive for separate bike lanes » MD 178 north of Knollwood Drive could support separated bike facilities up to the Paul Birch Drive intersection, where the right-of-way narrows significantly » Consider bike lanes on West Street from US 50 to Taylor Avenue » Incorporate separated bike lanes with improvements at the Housley Road/Bestgate Road/MD 178 intersection. Travel Demand Forecasting Since the 2009 General Development Plan, several new residential subdivisions have been approved to support the planned commercial growth of the Annapolis Town Center. The area’s commercial and residential growth is expected to continue into 2040, as it becomes an expansion of urban Annapolis. The Annapolis Town Center will be home to dense housing, while the surrounding area can expect growth in single family homes. Other employment growth is projected for the US Naval Academy, with corresponding moderate housing growth north of US 50, along the B&A Trail. Additional moderate housing growth is projected for the Crofton area of the travel shed, also north of US 50. Table 1: Comparison of CGMP Forecasts Employment Population Housing Corridor Corridor Corridor U.S. Route 50 U.S. Route 50 U.S. Route 50 0% - 25% 0% - 15% 0% - 5% 6% - 25% 6% - 15% 6% - 15% 16% - 25% 16% - 25% 16% - 25% 26% - 50% 26% - 50% 26% - 50% 0 1 2 Miles 0 1 2 Miles 0 1 2 Miles > 50% ¯ > 50% ¯ > 50% ¯ Recent and Committed Projects » No significant roadway projects have been placed in service since the 2009 General Development Plan. » Under Construction: Project to ease congestion on US 50 from MD 70 to MD 2 (northbound), by restriping lanes on the Severn River Bridge to accommodate one additional eastbound travel lane. » SHA expanded a park and ride lot at US 50 at MD 424 in 2016. » MTA implemented Commuter BusLink Route 210 from Kent Island and Annapolis to Downtown Baltimore. TFMP Candidate Roadway Projects Project Status Cost Estimate Reconfiguration of Severn River Bridge is underway Widen US 50 between I-97 and Bay to allow for westbound expansion to 4 lanes; no --- Bridge from 6 to 8 lanes. impact on eastbound traffic. Extend car pool lanes from I-97 to No action planned. --- Prince George’s County line. Interchange improvements at I-97. No action planned. --- Roadway Project Locations Planning Gaps & Conflicts Recommendations Highway Highway » With reconfiguration of the US 50 bridge over the » Defer recommendation for US 50 eastbound widening Severn River, SHA expects significant congestion relief and consider along with improvements to I-97 in the area which is the most congested segment of the interchange. As an interim strategy, advance TSMO corridor west of the Bay Bridge. The recommended and transit/HOV strategies in the entire corridor widening from 6 to 8 lanes may not be warranted including between Prince George’s County line and unless coupled with HOV/transit service expansion. MD 70. » SHA is not currently planning widening or improvements » As a long-term strategy, advance HOV lanes in the along US 50; however, SHA’s Highway Needs corridor. Inventory identifies the HOV lanes as a priority project. » There are ongoing discussions of interchange improvements or transportation systems management/ operations (TSMO) strategies at I-97 but no specific project is identified in any plan. Transit Transit » MTA currently offers commuter bus service departs » Additional commuter bus service in the US 50 corridor Annapolis, Davidsonville and Severna Park every 15 is warranted over time, especially when coupled with minutes between 5:00 AM and 8:00 AM HOV lane expansion. » The Corridor Growth Management Plan calls for premium bus service along US 50 from Annapolis to downtown DC using HOV lanes. The Transit Development Plan also includes this recommendation. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities » No pedestrian or bicycle improvements are Advance projects from the BPMP and: recommended for US 50. This corridor is a limited » Upgrade bicycle lanes to separated facilities on Naval access highway, and no pedestrians or bicycles are Academy Bridge over the Severn River. permitted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Optimization Plan September 2017
    Transit Optimization Plan September 2017 Prepared by: Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................6 Goals and Focus ........................................................................................................... 6 Study Process ............................................................................................................... 7 Report Contents ........................................................................................................... 8 Existing Conditions .....................................................................................................................9 Market Assessment ...................................................................................................... 9 Population ..........................................................................................................................9 Employment .......................................................................................................................9 Development Patterns ........................................................................................................9 Regional Growth ............................................................................................................... 10 Growth in Senior Population ............................................................................................. 10 Transit’s Role in Mobility ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuterdirect.Com for Pricing)
    Rvsd 7/21 Annapolis EFFECTIVE JUNE 27, Fares 2021 Governor Ritchie Highway For more information, or to request From Davidsonville to Washington, D.C. is Zone 3; from Kent LEGEND • College Parkway this document in an alternate format or Island to Washington D.C. is Zone 4. 250 Line Bus Stop translated into another language, please Zone 3 Zone 4 Park & Ride One Way – Full Fare $6.00 $7.00 301 50 contact the department listed below. d One Way – Senior/Disability Fare $5.00 $6.00 ’s Roa ret Ten Trip – Full Fare $60.00 $70.00 arga M t. Ten Trip – Senior/Disability $50.00 $60.00 G S Para mayor información o para solicitar en 301 250 e Monthly Pass Full Fare $204.00 $238.00 ral 450 s H este documento en un formato alternativo o ig 50 179 h Monthly Pass – Senior/Disability $170.00 $204.00 w a Romancoke Road y 2 traducido a otro idioma, por favor contacte el Transit Link Card (refer to commuterdirect.com for pricing) 178 70 Rowe Boulevard 648 450 departamento enlistado abajo. • Commuter Bus Ticket Sales COMMUTER BUS To Washington Rowe Boulevard 450 Commuter Direct MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION via Davidsonville P&R 2 Website: MTA.CommuterDirect.com DAVIDSONVILLE 301 50 W 70 Phone: 410-697-2212 es 50 欲了解更多信息或欲索取另一种格 450 t Str 301 450 Main Street Kent Narrows 2 eet ad 665 Park & Ride Charm Pass (mobile ticket) KENT ISLAND AND Ro lvd 8 iva Aris T B R Stevensville M 式或译成其它语言的本文档， Website: mta.maryland.gov/charmpass ain Str d Park & Ride ee TO WASHINGTON, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Metropolitan Region Transportation Demand Management
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN REGION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT RESOURCE GUIDE AND STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN Version 12.0 FY09 Final Report December 2008 PREPARED BY: COG/TPB Staff in conjunction with the COMMUTER CONNECTIONS REGIONAL TDM MARKETING GROUP - Table of Contents - FY09 TDM Resource Guide and SMP ~ Section One ~ Background……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 4 Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 6 Regional Activity Centers………………………………………………………………………………………Page 8 Mission Statement ………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 9 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 10 Guiding Principles of Strategic Marketing Plan……………………………………………………………Page 12 Key Findings and Strategic Implications……………………………………………………………………Page 13 Summary of Proposed Strategy for FY 2009…………………………………………………………………Page 15 ~ Section Two ~ Regional Profile……………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 17 Product Profiles……………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 19 Carpools and Vanpools…………………………………………………………………………………………Page 20 HOV Lanes………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 23 Transit…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 30 Table – Summary of Bus Activity………………………………………………………………………………Page 32 Table – Summary of Rail Activity………………………………………………………………………………Page 36 Table - Summary of Park & Ride Activity………………………………………………………………………Page 38 Telework………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 40 Bicycling………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 42 Bike Sharing……………………………………………………………….…….…………..………..….Page 45 Car Sharing………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Payment Systems Partnership Action Plan
    Regional Payment Systems Partnership Action Plan September 25, 2000 Vollpe Natiionall Transportatiion Systems Center Regional Payment Systems Partnership: Phase I Action Plan Virginia Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................................1 2 Context...........................................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Regional Electronic Payment Systems Coordination.........................................................................5 2.1.1 General Concept............................................................................................................................5 2.1.2 Contactless Card Standards and Interoperability........................................................................9 2.1.2.1 Types of Cards and Standards .................................................................................................9 2.1.2.2 System Interoperability..........................................................................................................10 2.1.3 Benefits........................................................................................................................................10 2.1.3.1 Increasing Customer Convenience........................................................................................10 2.1.3.2 Improve Operational Efficiency............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore City
    November 2007 BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2. Table of Contents - TO2035 FiI I 12/12/2007 9:34:38 AM This page left blank intentionally. 2. Table of Contents - TO2035 FiII II 12/12/2007 9:34:49 AM Table of Contents | Transportation Outlook 2035 Table of Contents Executive Summary What is Transportation Outlook 2035? ..................................................................................... iii Introduction, Section 1 Planning Process For Transportation Outlook 2035 ..............................iv Introduction, Section 2 Will Transportation Outlook 2035 Be Successful? ...............................vii Introduction, Section 3 Addressing the Funding Shortfall ......................................................ix Chapter One Transportation Planning in the Baltimore Region ........................................................................3 Chapter 1, Section 1 The Baltimore Regional Transportation Board ......................................4 Chapter 1, Section 2 Metropolitan Planning Area .............................................................5 Chapter 1, Section 3 SAFETEA-LU ...............................................................................6 Chapter 1, Section 4 Regional Transportation Planning Process ...........................................9 Chapter 1, Section 5 Goals, Strategies, and Supporting Actions ......................................... 14 Baltimore Regional Transportation Board I 2. Table of Contents - TO2035 FiSec1:I Sec1:I 12/12/2007 9:34:49 AM TRANSPORTATION OUTLOOK 2035
    [Show full text]
  • Commuterdirect.Com for Pricing) Bus Stop • Commuter Bus Ticket Sales COMMUTER BUS Annapolis Departamento Enlistado Abajo
    To Severna Park Rvsd 7/21 Annapolis Fares EFFECTIVE JUNE 27, For more information, or to request • From Kent Island to Washington, D.C. is Zone 4; from Annapolis and 2021 this document in an alternate format or Davidsonville to Washington, D.C. is Zone 3. Zone 3 Zone 4 translated into another language, please One Way – Full Fare $6.00 $7.00 301 contact the department listed below. One Way – Senior/Disability Fare $5.00 $6.00 50 Ten Trip – Full Fare $60.00 $70.00 Ten Trip – Senior/Disability $50.00 $60.00 Para mayor información o para solicitar LEGEND Monthly Pass Full Fare $204.00 $238.00 220 No. 220 Route este documento en un formato alternativo o Monthly Pass – Senior/Disability $170.00 $204.00 Midday/last PM trip traducido a otro idioma, por favor contacte el Transit Link Card (refer to commuterdirect.com for pricing) Bus Stop • Commuter Bus Ticket Sales COMMUTER BUS Annapolis departamento enlistado abajo. Park & Ride 2 Commuter Direct 15th St. MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 4th St. U St. 7th St. U St. Website: MTA.CommuterDirect.com 70 U St. TO 70 Downtown Washington, D.C. Phone: 410-697-2212 9th St. Downtown Washington, D.C. 14th St. 13th St. 3rd St. 2nd St. 11th St. 9th St. 欲了解更多信息或欲索取另一种格 12th St. 12th St. T St. 178 Bestgate Rd. Charm Pass (mobile ticket) ANNAPOLIS T St. Website: mta.maryland.gov/charmpass General's Hwy. 2 式或译成其它语言的本文档， WASHINGTON, D.C. Florida Ave. To Kent Island Phone: 833-242-7622 8th St. New Hampshire Ave. 16th St.
    [Show full text]
  • History of MDOT MTA and the Lots System
    History of Transit Organization in the Baltimore Region Transit Agencies and Service Development in the Baltimore Region OVERVIEW The Baltimore Regional Transit Governance and Funding Study will develop alternatives for how the region could structure, organize, and fund regional transit services. The approach to developing these alternatives includes working with the Baltimore Regional Transit Board (BRTB) through an iterative process of research, analysis, and stakeholder input to ensure that the alternatives are grounded in experience, respectful of history and constraints, but creative enough to recognize opportunities. This technical memo, the first in the series, focuses on the history and development of transit services in the Baltimore Region. The first step involves focusing on the history and development of transit Image from Creative Commons: ETLamborghini services in the Baltimore region to understand how the existing service network came to be and provides the context for why some regional services are operated by the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) and others by Locally Operated Transit Systems (LOTS). Our goal is that by understanding the historical perspective, we will understand the transit network, its origins and evolution and its current form. The overview and historical perspective include the development and evolution of: • State leadership for local transit services in the City of Baltimore. • State leadership for regional transit services, including the MARC commuter rail system and the Commuter Bus program. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | KFH Group | KPMG | Tamar Henkin 1 History of Transit Organization in the Baltimore Region • County leadership for local services in the counties surrounding Baltimore through the Locally Operated Transit System (LOTS) program.
    [Show full text]
  • Annapolis Transit Development Plan 2018 I
    Annapolis Transit Transit Development Plan DRAFT REPORT December 2018 Prepared for Annapolis Transit, City of Annapolis, Maryland Prepared by KFH Group, Inc. Bethesda, Maryland Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1: Review of Existing Services Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 Annapolis Transit Services ............................................................................................ 1-2 Funding and Fare Policy ................................................................................................ 1-21 Service Performance Evaluation ................................................................................... 1-25 Existing Facilities, Fleet, and Technology ...................................................................... 1-37 Marketing and Communications .................................................................................... 1-44 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access ...................................................................................... 1-45 Other Area Transportation Providers ............................................................................. 1-48 Chapter 2: Review of Transit Needs Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2-1 Demographics and Land Use ........................................................................................ 2-1 Stakeholder and Public Input ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Arundel County Transportation Center Feasibility Study
    Anne Arundel County Transportation Center Feasibility Study January 2020 Anne Arundel County Transportation Center Feasibility Study January 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 Existing Service and Previous Studies ................................................................................. 4 3.1 AAOT ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Annapolis Transit .............................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Regional Transportation Agency (RTA) Existing Service .................................................. 8 3.3 Other Transit Services .....................................................................................................10 3.4 MDOT MTA .....................................................................................................................10 3.4.1 MDOT MTA LocalLink 67: Marley Neck (Energy Parkway) to Downtown (City Hall) ..11 3.4.2 MDOT MTA LocalLink 69/70: Patapsco Light Rail Station to Annapolis/Jumpers Hole .......................................................................................................................................12 3.4.3 MDOT MTA LocalLink 75: Patapsco
    [Show full text]
  • Charles County Vango Transit Development Plan
    Charles County VanGO Transit Development Plan Final Report January 2019 Charles County Maryland Transit Development Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction Background ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Transit Development Plan Advisory Committee ................................................................................ 1-1 Overview of the Plan .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 Chapter 2: Review of Existing Conditions Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 2-1 VanGO Services .................................................................................................................................. 2-1 Ridership Data .................................................................................................................................... 2-4 Operating and Performance Data ...................................................................................................... 2-5 VanGO Route Profiles ........................................................................................................................ 2-6 System Performance .......................................................................................................................... 2-22 VanGO Fare Structure .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]