DFS Weihe AB Flygplan Se
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ilmailumuseoselvitys 2020
ILMAILUMUSEOSELVITYS 2020 SUOMALAISET ILMAILUHISTORIALLISET KOKOELMAT 1 Sisällys 1. Selvitystehtävä........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Tehtävän sisältö ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2. Selvityksen toteutustapa ............................................................................................................... 2 2. Työn perusteet ja muut ajankohtaiset selvitykset .................................................................................... 3 2.1. Selvitys ilmailumuseoiden yhteistoiminnan kehittämisestä 2013 ................................................ 3 2.2. Museolain uudistus ja valtakunnalliset vastuumuseot 2020 ........................................................ 4 2.3. Liikenteen alan museoiden selvitys keväällä 2020 ........................................................................ 5 2.4. Uusi ilmailumuseo ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.5. Ilmavoimamuseon kehittäminen ................................................................................................... 7 3. Museot ja muut kokoelmat – nykytilan kuvaus ........................................................................................ 8 3.1. Yleisiä havaintoja .......................................................................................................................... -
Military Aircraft Crash Sites in South-West Wales
MILITARY AIRCRAFT CRASH SITES IN SOUTH-WEST WALES Aircraft crashed on Borth beach, shown on RAF aerial photograph 1940 Prepared by Dyfed Archaeological Trust For Cadw DYFED ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRUST RHIF YR ADRODDIAD / REPORT NO. 2012/5 RHIF Y PROSIECT / PROJECT RECORD NO. 105344 DAT 115C Mawrth 2013 March 2013 MILITARY AIRCRAFT CRASH SITES IN SOUTH- WEST WALES Gan / By Felicity Sage, Marion Page & Alice Pyper Paratowyd yr adroddiad yma at ddefnydd y cwsmer yn unig. Ni dderbynnir cyfrifoldeb gan Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Dyfed Cyf am ei ddefnyddio gan unrhyw berson na phersonau eraill a fydd yn ei ddarllen neu ddibynnu ar y gwybodaeth y mae’n ei gynnwys The report has been prepared for the specific use of the client. Dyfed Archaeological Trust Limited can accept no responsibility for its use by any other person or persons who may read it or rely on the information it contains. Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Dyfed Cyf Dyfed Archaeological Trust Limited Neuadd y Sir, Stryd Caerfyrddin, Llandeilo, Sir The Shire Hall, Carmarthen Street, Llandeilo, Gaerfyrddin SA19 6AF Carmarthenshire SA19 6AF Ffon: Ymholiadau Cyffredinol 01558 823121 Tel: General Enquiries 01558 823121 Adran Rheoli Treftadaeth 01558 823131 Heritage Management Section 01558 823131 Ffacs: 01558 823133 Fax: 01558 823133 Ebost: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Gwefan: www.archaeolegdyfed.org.uk Website: www.dyfedarchaeology.org.uk Cwmni cyfyngedig (1198990) ynghyd ag elusen gofrestredig (504616) yw’r Ymddiriedolaeth. The Trust is both a Limited Company (No. 1198990) and a Registered Charity (No. 504616) CADEIRYDD CHAIRMAN: Prof. B C Burnham. CYFARWYDDWR DIRECTOR: K MURPHY BA MIFA SUMMARY Discussions amongst the 20th century military structures working group identified a lack of information on military aircraft crash sites in Wales, and various threats had been identified to what is a vulnerable and significant body of evidence which affect all parts of Wales. -
2020 Annual Noise Contour Report
Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport (MSP) 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report Comparison of the 2020 Actual and the 2007 Forecast Noise Contours February 2021 MAC Community Relations Office and HNTB Corporation MSP 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report Metropolitan Airports Commission Table of Contents ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 ES.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 1 ES.2 AIRPORT NOISE LITIGATION AND CONSENT DECREE .............................................................. 1 ES.3 MSP 2020 IMPROVEMENTS EA/EAW ..................................................................................... 2 ES.4 THE AMENDED CONSENT DECREE ......................................................................................... 2 ES.5 2020 NOISE CONTOURS ......................................................................................................... 3 ES.6 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY ............................................................. 3 ES.7 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM MITIGATION STATUS ............................................. 3 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 8 1.1 CORRECTIVE LAND USE EFFORTS TO ADDRESS AIRCRAFT NOISE ............................................ 8 1.2 2007 FORECAST CONTOUR ................................................................................................. -
Programme Ceac / Jaa D’Évaluation De La Sécurité Des Aéronefs Étrangers
CONFÉRENCE EUROPÉENNE DE L’AVIATION CIVILE PROGRAMME CEAC / JAA D’ÉVALUATION DE LA SÉCURITÉ DES AÉRONEFS ÉTRANGERS RAPPORT SAFA (01 JANVIER 2004 AU 31 DÉCEMBRE 2004) - 2 - TABLE DES MATIÈRES PAGE AVANT-PROPOS 3 1. POINTS FORTS DU PROGRAMME SAFA 5 1.1 Généralités 5 I.2 Intégration du programme dans l’ensemble de la chaîne de sécurité de l’aviation 5 2. ÉVOLUTION DU PROGRAMME SAFA EN 2004 7 3. FORMATION DES INSPECTEURS 8 4. BASE DE DONNÉES CENTRALE SAFA 9 5. COLLECTE DES DONNÉES 10 6. DOMAINES D’INSPECTION 12 7. PRINCIPAUX RÉSULTATS DES INSPECTIONS SAFA 14 7.1 Constatations générales des inspections 14 7.2 Constatations et catégories des inspections 15 7.3 Constatations des inspections sur le plan régional 17 7.4 Constatations des inspections rapportées aux éléments de la check-list 18 7.5 Les trois premières constatations significatives et majeures des inspections rapportées aux éléments de la check-list 18 8. MESURES PRISES APRÈS LES INSPECTIONS SUR L’AIRE DE TRAFIC 23 9. ACTION FUTURE 24 10. COOPÉRATION INTERNATIONALE 25 10.1 Coopération avec les autorités de l’Aviation civile des États non-CEAC 25 10.2 Coopération avec EUROCONTROL 25 10.3 Coopération avec l’OACI 25 APPENDICE A 26 Liste des États des exploitants inspectés 26 APPENDICE B 29 Types d’aéronefs inspectés 29 APPENDICE C 33 Exploitants inspectés 33 APPENDICE D 49 Résultats des inspections par élément d’inspection 49 APPENDICE E 51 Résultats des inspections par élément d’inspection par an 51 APPENDICE F 56 Résultats des inspections par éléments d’inspection 56 - 3 - AVANT-PROPOS Par le Président de la CEAC Avant de vous inviter à lire ce rapport qui donne une vue d’ensemble de la mise en œuvre du programme SAFA en 2004, je voudrais fournir un éclairage sur le programme et sur certaines caractéristiques essentielles de celui-ci. -
3-VIEWS - TABLE of CONTENTS to Search: Hold "Ctrl" Key Then Press "F" Key
3-VIEWS - TABLE of CONTENTS To search: Hold "Ctrl" key then press "F" key. Enter manufacturer or model number in search box. Click your back key to return to the search page. It is highly recommended to read Order Instructions and Information pages prior to selection. Aircraft MFGs beginning with letter A ................................................................. 3 B ................................................................. 6 C.................................................................10 D.................................................................14 E ................................................................. 17 F ................................................................. 18 G ................................................................21 H................................................................. 23 I .................................................................. 26 J ................................................................. 26 K ................................................................. 27 L ................................................................. 28 M ................................................................30 N................................................................. 35 O ................................................................37 P ................................................................. 38 Q ................................................................40 R................................................................ -
79952 Federal Register / Vol
79952 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Unsafe Condition DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, (d) This AD was prompted by an accident Washington 98057–3356; telephone and the subsequent discovery of cracks in the Federal Aviation Administration (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. main rotor blade (blade) spars. We are issuing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 14 CFR Part 39 this AD to prevent blade failure and Discussion subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. [Docket No. FAA–2009–0864; Directorate We issued a supplemental notice of Compliance Identifier 2008–NM–202–AD; Amendment 39–16544; AD 2010–26–05] proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend (e) Before further flight, unless already 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that done: RIN 2120–AA64 would apply to the specified products. (1) Revise the Limitations section of the That supplemental NPRM was Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT Instructions for Continued Airworthiness by published in the Federal Register on AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes; establishing a life limit of 8,000 hours time- July 27, 2010 (75 FR 43878). That Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET in-service (TIS) for each blade set Remove supplemental NPRM proposed to FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G each blade set with 8,000 or more hours TIS. correct an unsafe condition for the Airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON (2) Replace each specified serial-numbered specified products. The MCAI states: 200 Airplanes; Model MYSTERE- blade set with an airworthy blade set in During maintenance on one aircraft, it was accordance with the following table: FALCON 20–C5, 20–D5, 20–E5, and 20– F5 Airplanes; Model FALCON 2000 and discovered that the overpressure capsules were broken on both pressurization valves. -
DASSAULT AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes
43878 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules Applicability New Requirements of This AD: Actions Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April 27, (c) This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. (h) Within 30 months after the effective 2009; and Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100– Model F.28 Mark 0100 airplanes, certificated date of this AD, do the actions specified in 27–29, dated November 14, 2008; for related in any category, all serial numbers. paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD information. concurrently. Accomplishing the actions of Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 21, Subject both paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD 2010. (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of terminates the actions required by paragraph Jeffrey E. Duven, America Code 27: Flight Controls. (g) of this AD. (1) Remove the tie-wrap, P/N MS3367–2– Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Reason 9, from the lower bolts of the horizontal Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. (e) The mandatory continuing stabilizer control unit, in accordance with the [FR Doc. 2010–18399 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] airworthiness information (MCAI) states: Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Two reports have been received where, Service Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April during inspection of the vertical stabilizer of 27, 2009. F28 Mark 0100 aeroplanes, one of the bolts (2) Remove the lower bolts, P/N 23233–1, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION that connect the horizontal stabilizer control of the horizontal stabilizer control unit and unit actuator with the dog-links was found install bolts, P/N 23233–3, in accordance Federal Aviation Administration broken (one on the nut side & one on the with the Accomplishment Instructions of Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100–27–29, head side). -
Military Vehicle Options Arising from the Barrel Type Piston Engine
Journal of Power Technologies 101 (1) (2021) 22–33 Military vehicle options arising from the barrel type piston engine Pawe l Mazuro1 and Cezary Chmielewski1,B 1Warsaw University of Technology B [email protected] Abstract in terms of efficiency, meaning that piston engines can deliver enhanced range and endurance. This is benefi- The article reviews knowledge about requirements for engines in cial in missions requiring a stopover for refueling and state-of-the-art unmanned aerial vehicles and tanks. Analysis of particularly useful for unmanned supply, observation design and operational parameters was carried out on selected and maritime missions. turboshaft and piston engines generating power in the range of 500 - 1500 kW (0.5 - 1.5 MW). The data was compared In contrast, land combat vehicles have significantly with the performance of innovative, barrel type piston engines, different drive unit requirements. High mobility en- which are likely to become an alternative drive solution in the ables the vehicle to rapidly change location after de- target vehicle groups. tection. To this end, the torque curve as a function of the rotational speed of the shaft is of decisive im- portance. Keywords: military UAV, tanks, turboshaft engines, piston engines, barrel type piston engines The complexity of tank engines adds an additional layer of requirements, impacting the reliability and durability of the power unit, and they come with re- 1 Introduction lated manufacturing and operating costs. In military land vehicles, the engine should be as small This article consolidates knowledge on options and as possible; the space saved can be used for other capabilities arising from use of the barrel type piston purposes. -
Aircraft Library
Interagency Aviation Training Aircraft Library Disclaimer: The information provided in the Aircraft Library is intended to provide basic information for mission planning purposes and should NOT be used for flight planning. Due to variances in Make and Model, along with aircraft configuration and performance variability, it is necessary acquire the specific technical information for an aircraft from the operator when planning a flight. Revised: June 2021 Interagency Aviation Training—Aircraft Library This document includes information on Fixed-Wing aircraft (small, large, air tankers) and Rotor-Wing aircraft/Helicopters (Type 1, 2, 3) to assist in aviation mission planning. Click on any Make/Model listed in the different categories to view information about that aircraft. Fixed-Wing Aircraft - SMALL Make /Model High Low Single Multi Fleet Vendor Passenger Wing Wing engine engine seats Aero Commander XX XX XX 5 500 / 680 FL Aero Commander XX XX XX 7 680V / 690 American Champion X XX XX 1 8GCBC Scout American Rockwell XX XX 0 OV-10 Bronco Aviat A1 Husky XX XX X XX 1 Beechcraft A36/A36TC XX XX XX 6 B36TC Bonanza Beechcraft C99 XX XX XX 19 Beechcraft XX XX XX 7 90/100 King Air Beechcraft 200 XX XX XX XX 7 Super King Air Britten-Norman X X X 9 BN-2 Islander Cessna 172 XX XX XX 3 Skyhawk Cessna 180 XX XX XX 3 Skywagon Cessna 182 XX XX XX XX 3 Skylane Cessna 185 XX XX XX XX 4 Skywagon Cessna 205/206 XX XX XX XX 5 Stationair Cessna 207 Skywagon/ XX XX XX 6 Stationair Cessna/Texron XX XX XX 7 - 10 208 Caravan Cessna 210 X X x 5 Centurion Fixed-Wing Aircraft - SMALL—cont’d. -
Air Transport
The History of Air Transport KOSTAS IATROU Dedicated to my wife Evgenia and my sons George and Yianni Copyright © 2020: Kostas Iatrou First Edition: July 2020 Published by: Hermes – Air Transport Organisation Graphic Design – Layout: Sophia Darviris Material (either in whole or in part) from this publication may not be published, photocopied, rewritten, transferred through any electronical or other means, without prior permission by the publisher. Preface ommercial aviation recently celebrated its first centennial. Over the more than 100 years since the first Ctake off, aviation has witnessed challenges and changes that have made it a critical component of mod- ern societies. Most importantly, air transport brings humans closer together, promoting peace and harmo- ny through connectivity and social exchange. A key role for Hermes Air Transport Organisation is to contribute to the development, progress and promo- tion of air transport at the global level. This would not be possible without knowing the history and evolu- tion of the industry. Once a luxury service, affordable to only a few, aviation has evolved to become accessible to billions of peo- ple. But how did this evolution occur? This book provides an updated timeline of the key moments of air transport. It is based on the first aviation history book Hermes published in 2014 in partnership with ICAO, ACI, CANSO & IATA. I would like to express my appreciation to Professor Martin Dresner, Chair of the Hermes Report Committee, for his important role in editing the contents of the book. I would also like to thank Hermes members and partners who have helped to make Hermes a key organisa- tion in the air transport field. -
Accident to an Eurocopter Ec120 in Soumagne on 18 October 2011
Air Accident Investigation Unit -(Belgium) CCN Rue du Progrès 80 Bte 5 1030 Brussels Safety Investigation Report ACCIDENT TO AN EUROCOPTER EC120 IN SOUMAGNE ON 18 OCTOBER 2011 Ref. AAIU-2011-26 Issue date: 16 October 2012 Status: Final TABLE OF CONTENT FOREWORD………………………………………………………………………..3 SYNOPSIS 4 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION 5 1.1. HISTORY OF THE FLIGHT 5 1.2. INJURIES TO PERSONS 7 1.3. DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT 7 1.4. OTHER DAMAGE 7 1.5. PERSONNEL INFORMATION 7 1.6. AIRCRAFT INFORMATION 8 1.7. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION 10 1.8. AIDS TO NAVIGATION 13 1.9. COMMUNICATION 15 1.10. AERODROME INFORMATION 16 1.11. FLIGHT RECORDERS 16 1.12. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION 19 1.13. MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION 26 1.14. FIRE 26 1.15. SURVIVAL ASPECTS 27 1.16. TEST AND RESEARCH 28 1.17. ORGANISATION AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 28 2. ANALYSIS 29 3. CONCLUSIONS 32 4. SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS 33 AAIU-2011-26 FOREWORD This report is a technical document that reflects the views of the investigation team on the circumstances that led to the accident. In accordance with Annex 13 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, it is not the purpose of aircraft accident investigation to apportion blame or liability. The sole objective of the investigation and the Final Report is the determination of the causes, and define recommendations in order to prevent future accidents and incidents. In particular, Art. 17.3 of EU Regulation 996/2010 stipulates that a safety recommendation shall in no case create a presumption of blame or liability for an accident, serious incident or incident. -
Hawker Siddeley HS 748 Series 2 Aircraft G-ATEK and G-ATEH of Channel Airways Report on the Accidents at Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth~ Hampshire on 15 August 1967
CIVIL AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT 1/71 ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATION BRANCH Department of Trade and Industry Hawker Siddeley HS 748 Series 2 aircraft G-ATEK and G-ATEH of Channel Airways Report on the accidents at Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth~ Hampshire on 15 August 1967 LONDON: HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1971 List of Civil Aircraft Accident Reports issued by AIB in 1971 No. Short title Date of publication 1nl Hawker Siddeley HS 748's G-ATEK and March 1971 G-ATEH at Portsmouth, August 1967 SBN 11 5106308 Department of Trade and Industry Accidents Investigation Branch Shell Mex House Strand London WC2 November 1970 The Rt Hon John Davies MP Secretary of State for Trade and Industry Sir , I have the honour to submit the report of Mr RC Warren, an Inspector of Accidents, on the circumstances of the accidents to Hawker Siddeley HS 748 Series 2 aircraft G-ATEK and G-ATEH which occurred at Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth, Hampshire on 15 August 1967. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient Servant, V AM HUNT Chief Inspector of Accidents Accidents Investigation Branch Civil Accident Combined Report Nos EW/C/0179 and EW/C/0180 Aircraft: Hawker Siddeley HS 748, .Series , 2, G-ATEK and G-ATEH Engines: Each aircraft was fitted with two Rolls Royce Dart Type 531 engines. Owner and Channel Airways Limited, Southend Airport, Essex Operator: Crews: G-ATEK Commander Captain D P Dogherty Uninjured Co-pilot First Officer K F Fenton Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss J W Goody Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss J Hoare Uninjured G-ATEH Commander Captain F P Mannl Uninjured Co-pilot First Officer C Petrides Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss G M Smith Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss P Crane Uninjured Passengers: G-ATEK 19 Uninjured G-ATEH 62 Uninjured Other Persons: Nil Place of Accident: Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth, Hampshire Date and Times: 15 August 1967 at 1148 hrs (G-ATEK) and 1334 hrs (G-ATEH) All times in this report are GMT The abbreviation MOA/DTI is used in this report to refer to the authority previously exercised by the Ministry of Aviation.