APEC Port Development Reoort 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

APEC Port Development Reoort 2018 2018 APEC Port Development Reoort 2018 1 2 2018 APEC Port Development Report www.apecpsn.org APEC Port Services Network (APSN) is an international organization established in response to the directives of the 14th APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting in 2006 and with the support of all leaders from APEC member economies to promote exchanges and cooperation among ports and port-related industries in the Asia-Pacific region. The mandate of the APSN is to facilitate trade and investment and enhance supply chain security by strengthening economic cooperation, capacity building, information and personnel exchanges among port and port-related industries and services in the region, so as to achieve the common prosperity of the APEC member economies as a whole. Ever since establishment of APSN, as a complimentary service for port-related industries in the Asia-Pacific region, APEC Port Development Report has published 8 issues. This report focuses on the development of Asia-Pacific ports in 2018, covering trade, ocean shipping, port infrastructure and operation, laws and regulations, intelligent and sustainable development. With its detailed statistics, and in-depth analyses, APEC Port Development Report has become an important reference for those engaging in port-related industries. The APSN secretariat sincerely welcomes your advice, and we hope that ports and organizations can contribute variously valuable information so that we can follow the development of the industry even closer, and provide our readers with more accurate information in a more timely fashion. Fei Weijun Secretary General APEC Port Services Network May 2019 3 2018 APEC Port Development Report www.apecpsn.org 3 4 2018 APEC Port Development Report www.apecpsn.org 4 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Review of Global and Asia-Pacific Economic and Trade Development in 2018 1.1 Review of Global Economic and Trade Development........................................................6 1.2 Review of Asia-Pacific Economic and Trade Development.............................................11 Chapter 2 Review of Global and Asia-Pacific Shipping Industry Development in 2018 2.1 Review of Global Shipping Industry Development............................................................20 2.2 Review of Asia-Pacific Shipping Industry Development...................................................28 2.3 Shipping Costs Showed Overall Downtrend......................................................................40 2.4 New Changes in Shipping Laws and Regulations.............................................................44 2.5 Development Trends of Shipping Organizations in the Asia-Pacific Region.................48 Chapter 3 Review of Port Development in the Asia-Pacific Region in 2018 3.1 Route Density and Major Hub Ports Distribution in the Asia-Pacific Region.................50 3.2 Review of Port Production...........................................................................................................57 3.3 Business Performance of Port Enterprises........................................................................85 3.4 Review of Multimodal Transport Development of Ports................................................99 3.5 Review of Port Infrastructure Construction......................................................................108 3.6 Review of Intelligent, Green and Safe Port Construction and Development.................115 3.7 Development Trends of International Port Organizations...............................................120 Chapter 4 Review and Comment on Major Shipping and Port Events in the Asia-Pacific Region in 2018 4.1 Review and Comment on Ten Major Shipping Events in the Asia-Pacific Region in 2018........................................................................................................................................124 4.2 Review and Comment on Ten Major Port Events in the Asia-Pacific Region in 2018........................................................................................................................................129 2 References.................................................................................................................................137 5 Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Review of Global and Asia-Pacific Economic and Trade Development in 2018 1.1 Review of Global Economic and Trade Development 1.1.1 Global economic growth slowed down, regional economic disparities continued to rise In 2018, the world economy failed to maintain a robust growing trend from the previous year and presented a weaker momentum and emerging signs of economic slowdown due to multiple factors including the high-level debts globally, the financial market volatility, the sluggish cross-border investment, and the intensifying international trade tensions. According to a report released by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in January 2019, the outlook for global GDP growth in 2018 was downgraded to 3.7 percent from 3.9 percent. The global economic growth remained high in 2018, but at a lower rate. As the global trade frictions spread, and geopolitical risks and turbulences in some parts of the world rose, the global economy's ability to maintain stable growth was undermined. Table 1-1 Global GDP Growth Rates in 2017-2020 (Unit: %) Historical Estimated Forecast Value Item Value Value 2017 2018 2019* 2020* Global GDP 3.8 3.7 3.5 3.6 Developed Economies 2.4 2.3 2 1.7 United States 2.2 2.9 2.5 1.8 Euro Zone 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.7 Japan 1.9 0.9 1.1 0.5 United Kingdom 1.8 1.4 1.5 1.6 Canada 3 2.1 1.9 1.9 Emerging Markets and 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.9 Developing Economies Russia 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.7 China 6.9 6.6 6.2 6.2 India 6.7 7.3 7.5 7.7 ASEAN 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.2 Brazil 1.1 1.3 2.5 2.2 Middle East, North Africa, 2.2 2.4 2.4 3 Afghanistan and Pakistan South Africa 1.3 0.8 1.4 1.7 Note: * indicates projections. Data source: IMF 6 2018 APEC Port Development Report www.apecpsn.org 6 The level of equilibrium in global economic growth dropped significantly in 2018, making it harder for the world to maintain the extensive economic growth as in 2017. Growth disparities started to rise among major economies. The U.S. economy seemed to be the only exception which delivered sound performance in 2018, while other developed economies, such as the Euro Zone and Japan, all reported less- than-satisfactory performance, and the emerging markets and developing economies moved downward overall in economic growth. The IMF's latest record shows that growth rates of developed economies and of emerging markets and developing economies both declined by 0.1 percentage points year-on-year, at 2.3 percent and 4.6 percent, respectively. Among developed economies, the U.S. outperformed everyone else in terms of economic growth by recording 2.9 percent of annual growth for 2018, up by 0.7 percentage points over the previous year. Driven by tax reduction and returning overseas investment, the U.S. enjoyed a record-low unemployment rate and a high- level consumer confidence index. The U.S. economy was among the few of the developed group to score an increasing growth rate. The Euro Zone once again suffered weak economic growth, as evidenced by its 1.8 percent growth rate in 2018, down by 0.6 percentage points year-on-year. It is worth noting that German economy started to shrink. Germany’s introduction of new fuel emission standards disrupted domestic automobile production in the first three quarters of 2018 and consequently led to declining exports, and a lower economic growth rate at 1.5 percent as a result. In the year, the economic growth of U.K. went down by 0.4 percentage points, as the nation was stuck with the Brexit deal that has hurt consumer and investment sentiments and crushed the economic growth momentum. The economy of the Euro Zone was also hit by outbreaks of social and economic crises, such as the "Yellow Vests Movement" in France and the political crisis in Italy. Though Japan managed to maintain steady growth for the first half of 2018, the Japanese economy was hurt by natural disasters such as earthquakes and tsunami in the second half of the year, with its annual growth rate declining to 0.9 percent. The increasing global trade frictions, interest rate hikes by the U.S. Fed, capital outflow, and oil price volatility among others jointly led to lower growth and more distinct differentiation of emerging markets and developing economies. In 2018, main emerging markets including Russia, India, and Brazil managed to keep inflation afloat and basically stay free from high inflation pressure and their economic growth recovered to a certain extent as a result. China managed to maintain overall stable growth, but with slower economic growth, namely at 6.6 percent annually, down by 0.3 percentage points year-on-year, due to sluggish internal demands and the Sino-U.S. trade frictions. The ASEAN states sustained flat growth, while the situation of South Africa was worsening with high unemployment. In view of the currency devaluation, which is the biggest of its kind in history, and the prevailing capital outflow, emerging economies faced increasing risks of a large-scale financial crisis. Looking into 2019, as uncertainty and instability prevail, the global economic growth will further slow down. As global debts remain high, geopolitical tension may 7 Chapter 1 intensify in the Middle East and East Asia, and the U.S. Fed will continue to raise interest rates, emerging economies are expected to face significant pressures on financial sectors, and global economies may perhaps further
Recommended publications
  • Competitiveness Analysis of China's Main Coastal Ports
    2019 International Conference on Economic Development and Management Science (EDMS 2019) Competitiveness analysis of China's main coastal ports Yu Zhua, * School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210000, China; [email protected] *Corresponding author Keywords: China coastal ports above a certain size, competitive power analysis, factor analysis, cluster analysis Abstract: As a big trading power, China's main mode of transportation of international trade goods is sea transportation. Ports play an important role in China's economic development. Therefore, improving the competitiveness of coastal ports is an urgent problem facing the society at present. This paper selects 12 relevant indexes to establish a relatively comprehensive evaluation index system, and uses factor analysis and cluster analysis to evaluate and rank the competitiveness of China's 30 major coastal ports. 1. Introduction Port is the gathering point and hub of water and land transportation, the distribution center of import and export of industrial and agricultural products and foreign trade products, and the important node of logistics. With the continuous innovation of transportation mode and the rapid development of science and technology, ports play an increasingly important role in driving the economy, with increasingly rich functions and more important status and role. Meanwhile, the competition among ports is also increasingly fierce. In recent years, with the rapid development of China's economy and the promotion of "the Belt and Road Initiative", China's coastal ports have also been greatly developed. China has more than 18,000 kilometers of coastline, with superior natural conditions. With the introduction of the policy of reformation and opening, the human conditions are also excellent.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballast Water Risk Assessment Final Report
    Ballast Water Risk Assessment Ballast Water Global Ballast Water Management Programme GLOBALLAST MONOGRAPH SERIES NO.12 Port of Dalian, People’s Republic of China Port of Dalian, People’s Ballast Water Risk Assessment Port of Dalian People’s Republic of China Final Report NOVEMBER 2003 Final Report Chris Clarke, Rob Hilliard, Liuy Yan, John Polglaze, Xu Xiaoman, GLOBALLAST MONOGRAPH SERIES Zhao Dianrong & Steve Raaymakers More Information? Programme Coordination Unit Global Ballast Water Management Programme International Maritime Organization 4 Albert Embankment London SE1 7SR United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7587 3247 or 3251 Fax: +44 (0)20 7587 3261 Web: http://globallast.imo.org NO.12 A cooperative initiative of the Global Environment Facility, United Nations Development Programme and International Maritime Organization. Cover designed by Daniel West & Associates, London. Tel (+44) 020 7928 5888 www.dwa.uk.com (+44) 020 7928 5888 www.dwa.uk.com & Associates, London. Tel Cover designed by Daniel West GloBallast Monograph Series No. 12 Ballast Water Risk Assessment Port of Dalian People’s Republic of China November 2003 Final Report Chris Clarke1, Rob Hilliard1, Liuy Yan3, John Polglaze1, Xu Xiaoman3, Zhao Dianrong2 & Steve Raaymakers4 1 URS Australia Pty Ltd, Perth, Western Australia 2 Liaoning Maritime Safety Administration, Dalian 3 China Maritime Safety Administration, Beijing 4 Programme Coordination Unit, GEF/UNDP/IMO Global Ballast Water Management Programme, International Maritime Organization ! International Maritime Organization ISSN 1680-3078 Published in April 2004 by the Programme Coordination Unit Global Ballast Water Management Programme International Maritime Organization 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, UK Tel +44 (0)20 7587 3251 Fax +44 (0)20 7587 3261 Email [email protected] Web http://globallast.imo.org The correct citation of this report is: Clarke, C., Hilliard, R., Liuy, Y., Polglaze, J., Zhao, D., Xu, X.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Merchant Marine
    “China’s Merchant Marine” A paper for the China as “Maritime Power” Conference July 28-29, 2015 CNA Conference Facility Arlington, Virginia by Dennis J. Blasko1 Introductory Note: The Central Intelligence Agency’s World Factbook defines “merchant marine” as “all ships engaged in the carriage of goods; or all commercial vessels (as opposed to all nonmilitary ships), which excludes tugs, fishing vessels, offshore oil rigs, etc.”2 At the end of 2014, the world’s merchant ship fleet consisted of over 89,000 ships.3 According to the BBC: Under international law, every merchant ship must be registered with a country, known as its flag state. That country has jurisdiction over the vessel and is responsible for inspecting that it is safe to sail and to check on the crew’s working conditions. Open registries, sometimes referred to pejoratively as flags of convenience, have been contentious from the start.4 1 Dennis J. Blasko, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army (Retired), a Senior Research Fellow with CNA’s China Studies division, is a former U.S. army attaché to Beijing and Hong Kong and author of The Chinese Army Today (Routledge, 2006).The author wishes to express his sincere thanks and appreciation to Rear Admiral Michael McDevitt, U.S. Navy (Ret), for his guidance and patience in the preparation and presentation of this paper. 2 Central Intelligence Agency, “Country Comparison: Merchant Marine,” The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2108.html. According to the Factbook, “DWT or dead weight tonnage is the total weight of cargo, plus bunkers, stores, etc., that a ship can carry when immersed to the appropriate load line.
    [Show full text]
  • APEC Port Development Report 2019
    2019 APEC Port Development Report 2019 1 2 2018 APEC Port Development Report www.apecpsn.org APEC Port Services Network (APSN) is an international organization established in response to the directives of the 14th APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting in 2006 and with the support of all leaders from APEC member economies to promote exchanges and cooperation among port and port-related industries in the Asia-Pacific region. The mandate of the APSN is to facilitate trade and investment and enhance supply chain security by strengthening economic cooperation, capacity building, information and personnel exchanges among port and port-related industries and services in the region, so as to achieve the common prosperity of the APEC member economies as a whole. Ever since establishment of APSN, as a complimentary service for port-related industries in the Asia-Pacific region, APEC Port Development Report has published 10 issues. This report focuses on the development of Asia-Pacific ports in 2019, covering trade, ocean shipping, port infrastructure and operation, laws and regulations, intelligent and sustainable development. With its detailed statistics, and in-depth analyses, APEC Port Development Report has become an important reference for those engaging in port-related industries. The APSN secretariat sincerely welcomes your advice, and we hope that ports and organizations can contribute variously valuable information so that we can follow the development of the industry even closer, and provide our readers with more accurate information in a more
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Evolution of the Chinese Port System (221BC-2010AD) Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet
    Regional resilience and spatial cycles: Long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221BC-2010AD) Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet To cite this version: Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet. Regional resilience and spatial cycles: Long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221BC-2010AD). Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, Wiley, 2013, 104 (5), pp.521-538. 10.1111/tesg.12033. halshs-00831906 HAL Id: halshs-00831906 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00831906 Submitted on 28 Sep 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Regional resilience and spatial cycles: long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221 BC - 2010 AD) Chengjin WANG Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Beijing 100101, China [email protected] César DUCRUET1 French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8504 Géographie-cités F-75006 Paris, France [email protected] Pre-final version of the paper published in Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 104, No. 5, pp. 521-538. Abstract Spatial models of port system evolution often depict linearly the emergence of hierarchy through successive concentration phases of originally scattered ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Chain Strategic Alliances Partner Selection for Rizhao Port
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 4, Issue 11, November 2014 1 ISSN 2250-3153 Supply Chain Strategic Alliances Partner Selection for Rizhao Port Libin Guo School of Management, Qufu Normal University,Rizhao276826,China Abstract- Under the background of port supply chain strategic alliances,we clarify the current situation of Rizhao Port by SWOT analysis and find out the ST strategy for it, furthermore, we screen out the optimal cooperation partner for Rizhao Port under different alliance forms range from horizontal integration and vertical integration to the blended dynamic logistics alliance. Index Terms- Port Supply Chain; the SWOT Analysis; RiZhao Port; Strategical alliance I. INTRODUCTION ort supply chain, a main constituent of port logistics, includes the levels such as informationization, automation and networking, P and emphasizes the modern management of material transportation chain of each link and the extension of comprehensive services.Meanwhile, due to the connection between ports and suppliers and consumers all over the world through shippping companies and land forwarding agents, a port supply chain integrating many means1 of transportation and types of logistics is formed, and it becomes a relatively best main part and link for the coordinated management of supply chain. Therefore, we can start from the analysis of the SWOT of Rizhao port supply chain, and find out the cooperative partners suitable for the strategical alliance of Rizhao port supply chain among different types of alliance. II. THE SWOT ANALYSIS OF RIZHAO PORT SUPPLY CHAIN The SWOT analysis, a commonly used method of strategic competition, is based on analyzing the internal conditions of enterprises itself, and finds out the strengths, weaknesses and core competence.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Competitive Position of Chinese Ports As Results of Non-Proximity Collaboration in the OBOR Period
    Erasmus University Rotterdam MSc in Maritime Economics and Logistics 2017/2018 Analysis of Competitive Position of Chinese Ports as Results of Non-proximity Collaboration in the OBOR Period by Guanjiabao Wen copyright © Guanjiabao Wen Acknowledgements The researcher wants to give thanks to all the persons that have supported a lot for this thesis. It is my honour to express my thanks. First, I would like to thank myself for full of passion and concentration to this study and finally finish the thesis successfully. To my family, I really appreciated that my father and mother support and believed me unconditionally. To my supervisor, Professor Dr. Elvira Haezendonck for guiding and helping me from the very start for the proposal until the completion of a thesis with her patience and rich knowledge. To my classmates, they companied me during whole thesis period; we encouraged and helped each other by updating the progress among our group. Especially Chen Yu, he inspired and taught me a lot with his rich working experience and precisian studying attitude. To MEL faculty, Renee, Felicia and Martha really did their best to help us with time management and thesis quality, which ensure most of us followed the thesis schedule. Last but not least, to my boyfriend, Chen Yichao for taking care of me during daily life, enable me to have a stable mental statue to deal with the pressure from the thesis. 1 Abstract Since the One Belt and One Road(OBOR) initiative was proposed by China’s president, Xi Jinping in 2013, China aims to create the world’s largest platform for economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation on “Traincost” Point-To-Point Train Costing Model
    Expert Group Meeting on Documentation and Procedures for Rail- Based Intermodal Transport Services in Northeast and Central Asia Bangkok 30-31 August 2016 Item 6: Overview of documents and procedures in current use on selected routes: Routes 1A, 1B and 2 Building 1 CONTENT For international transit routes: 1A (Republic of Korea to Europe via China and Kazakhstan); 1B (Republic of Korea to Central Asia via China); and 2 (Republic of Korea via China, Mongolia and Russian Federation), will consider: 1. Route status and major traffic flows 2. Summary of border control procedures and performance for route 3. Border control procedures in ports 4. Border control procedures at land borders 5. Documents used for border clearance along each route 2 Routes 1A and 1B: 1. Route status and major traffic flows • Routes shown in map on next slide • Route 1A starts in Port of Busan ROK and ends in Duisberg, Germany – total distance of 12,240 km, of which sea distance (via Lianyungang Port) is 1,114 km and rail distance 11,126 km • Route 1B starts in Port of Busan or Port of Incheon ROK and ends in Almaty or Tashkent – total distance (Incheon-Almaty via Qingdao Port), 5,549 km, of which sea distance is 659 km and rail distance 4,890 km • Both routes pass through one of two border control posts on the border between China and Kazakhstan, at Dostyk/Alashankou or Altynkol/Khorgos, where international cargo is stopped for transhipment between rail gauges, as well as for inspection and clearance procedures • In addition to intermodal transit cargo between ROK
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution Pathways, Dynamics and Perspectives of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (China)
    From a feeder port to a hub port: the evolution pathways, dynamics and perspectives of Ningbo-Zhoushan port (China) Abstract: This paper analyses the spatio-temporal evolution of Ningbo-Zhoushan port growing from a feeder port to a hub port finding the historical pathways followed by its expanding in terms of container throughput capacity and total traffic. The dynamic mechanism of evolution is the results of economic globalization, containerization and its natural endowments in channel and terminal depths. Analysis of the traffic evolution and its underlying dynamics suggest 3 periods in the development processes of container transport in Ningbo-Zhoushan: (1) adoption period (1986-2000) in which the main dynamics is the impact of the Chinese ‘Open Door policy’; (2) acceleration period (2001-2008) in which the dynamics is related of the mainland China’s entry into the WTO; (3) peak growth period (2009-now) in which the dynamics is impacted by the anti-crisis strategy against the financial and economic crisis in 2008. We analyse the perspectives of Ningbo-Zhoushan port. ARIMA model is employed to forecast the container traffic in the coming future; about after 2026, the throughput in Ningbo-Zhoushan port would reach about 49 million TEU which would be approximately equal to that of Shanghai port. The resultant port development would exemplify a model of spatial distribution such as a multi-layered gateway hub. In the respect of growth potential, Ningbo-Zhoushan port possesses excellent coastline resource suitable for deep-water berthing, bonded port policy and free trade zone policy. Geographical position, service level, hinterland economic level and government will support its perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Putian, China
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Coordination of Marine Functional Zoning Revision at the Provincial and Municipal Levels: A Case Study of Putian, China Faming Huang 1,*, Yanhong Lin 1,2, Huixin Liang 2, Rongrong Zhao 1, Qiuming Chen 1, Jie Lin 1 and Jinliang Huang 2,* 1 Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China; [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (Q.C.); [email protected] (J.L.) 2 College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (F.H.); [email protected] (J.H.); Tel.: +86-592-219-5001 (F.H.) Received: 11 October 2019; Accepted: 22 November 2019; Published: 3 December 2019 Abstract: Marine functional zoning (MFZ) is a type of marine spatial planning (MSP) implemented widely in China and one of the three major systems defined in the Law of the PRC on the Administration of Sea Area Use. China adopts “top-down management” for MFZ, in which upper management levels impose clear constraints and restrictions on lower levels. However, this approach has led to issues, such as a rigid MFZ classification system and unreasonable re-allocation of control indicators in the process of assigning MFZ classification at different levels. In this study, we propose and demonstrate the coordination of MFZ revision in terms of the classification system and the re-allocation of control indicators in the coastal city of Putian, China. The results show that the proposed measures could help realize the effective and reasonable coordination of MFZ revisions at the provincial and municipal levels, providing a reference for such MFZ revisions in other regions of China and the coordination of MSP between different levels in other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Maritime Silk Road Initiative
    CHINA’S MARITIME SILK ROAD INITIATIVE: IMPLI- CATIONS FOR THE GLOBAL MARITIME SUPPLY CHAIN (116–37) HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COAST GUARD AND MARITIME TRANSPORTATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 17, 2019 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( Available online at: https://www.govinfo.gov/committee/house-transportation?path=/ browsecommittee/chamber/house/committee/transportation U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 41–367 PDF WASHINGTON : 2020 VerDate Aug 31 2005 17:49 Sep 22, 2020 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\HEARINGS\116\CGMT\10-17-~1\TRANSC~1\41367.TXT JEAN TRANSPC154 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon, Chair ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, SAM GRAVES, Missouri District of Columbia DON YOUNG, Alaska EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas RICK LARSEN, Washington BOB GIBBS, Ohio GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky STEVE COHEN, Tennessee MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania JOHN GARAMENDI, California RODNEY DAVIS, Illinois HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia ROB WOODALL, Georgia ANDRE´ CARSON, Indiana JOHN KATKO, New York DINA TITUS, Nevada BRIAN BABIN, Texas SEAN PATRICK MALONEY, New York GARRET GRAVES, Louisiana JARED HUFFMAN, California DAVID ROUZER, North Carolina JULIA BROWNLEY, California MIKE BOST, Illinois FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida RANDY K. WEBER, SR., Texas DONALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey DOUG LAMALFA, California ALAN S. LOWENTHAL, California BRUCE WESTERMAN, Arkansas MARK DESAULNIER, California LLOYD SMUCKER, Pennsylvania STACEY E.
    [Show full text]
  • APEC Port Development Report 2020.Pdf
    APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Services Network APEC Port Serv Network Services Port Network APEC Services Port Network APEC Network Services Port Network Services Port Network APEC Services Port APEC Services Network Port APEC Network APEC Services Network Port Network Services Network Port Network Services APEC Services Port Services Port APEC Services APEC Port Port APEC Network APEC APEC Network Network Services Network Network Services Port Services Network Port Port APEC Services Services APEC Port APEC Services Port Port APEC Network APEC Network APEC Network Network Services Services Port Network Services Port Services Port Network APEC Port APEC Services Port APEC Services
    [Show full text]