DOCSLIB.ORG

Fisheries Pollution Reports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fisheries Pollution Reports FISHERIES POLLUTION REPORTS VOLUME 6 Prepared by Environmental Law Centre Edited by Donna Tingley Indexed by Shannon Keehn 1998 "The decisions and reasons for decision of the Fisheries Pollution Reports fall within the terms of the Reproduction of Federal Law Order, and may be reproduced, in whole or in part and by any means, without further permission. The captioned headnotes, lists of statutes and regulations, and cases and publications judicially considered do not fall within the terms of the Reproduction of Federal Law Order. They may be reproduced for personal use only, without further permission. They may not be reproduced for commercial purposes without permission from the Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, on behalf of Environment Canada. Any reproduction or any other use of the decisions, reasons for decision, captioned headnotes, lists of statutes and regulations, or cases and publications judicially considered must be properly attributed to Environment Canada. No such attribution shall indicate that Environment Canada is in any way responsible for the accuracy or reliability of the reproduction or other use; nor shall any such attribution indicate that the reproduction or other use was made with the endorsement of or in affiliation with Environment Canada. Environment Canada assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or the reliability of any reproduction of the materials appearing herein. The official versions of decisions and reasons for decision by Environment Canada are published in the Fisheries Pollution Reports." © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2001 Recycled Paper 204, 10709 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N3 Tel: (780) 424-5099 Fax: (780) 424-5133 Alberta Toll Free 1-800-661-4238 E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.elc.ab.ca II ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTRE The Environmental Law Centre (Alberta) Society is a non-profit charitable organization operating in Alberta since 1982. The society believes in making the law work to protect the environment and in support of this objective provides services in environmental law education and assistance, environmental law reform and environmental law research. The Society operates the Environmental Law Centre which is staffed by four full-time lawyers. Funding is provided to the Society in part by the Alberta Law Foundation and through the generous support of the public. The Centre also accepts private and government research contracts for work relevant to and consistent with the Society’s objectives. Environmental Law Centre 204, 10709 Jasper Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3N3 Tel: (780) 424-5099 Fax: (780) 424-5133 Alberta Toll Free: 1-800-661-4238 E-Mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.elc.ab.ca III TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................................................V CASES REPORTED ..................................................................................................................................................vi CONSOLIDATED TABLE OF CASES ....................................................................................................................x SUBJECT INDEX ......................................................................................................................................................xi TABLE OF STATUTES ........................................................................................................................................xxvi Indexed as: R. v. British Columbia ............................................................................................................................1 Indexed as: Kostuch (Informant) v. W.A. Stephenson (Western) Ltd........................................................................8 Indexed as: Carrier-Sekani Tribal Council v. Canada (Minister of the Environment) ......................................13 Indexed as: Ontario (Attorney General) v. Tyre King Tyre Recycling Ltd. ............................................................34 Indexed as: R. v. Shell Canada Products Ltd..........................................................................................................44 Indexed as: Bank of Montreal v. Lundrigans Ltd. .................................................................................................48 Indexed as: Eastmain Band v. Canada (Federal Administrator) #1.....................................................................58 Indexed as: R. v. Wentworth Valley Developments Ltd. .......................................................................................63 Indexed as: R. v. West Fraser Mills Ltd. #1 ............................................................................................................70 Indexed as: Eastmain Band v. Canada (Federal Administrator) #2.....................................................................80 Répertorié: Canada (Procureur général) c. Vernon Homes Inc..........................................................................105 Indexed as: R. v. Echo Bay Mines Ltd...................................................................................................................113 Indexed as: Curragh Resources Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Justice).................................................................118 Indexed as: R. v. Northwest Territories (Commissioner) #1 ...............................................................................138 Indexed as: R. v. Northwest Territories (Commissioner) #2 ...............................................................................142 Indexed as: R. v. Giammaria ...................................................................................................................................152 Indexed as: R. v. Scobey ..........................................................................................................................................155 Indexed as: R. v. Stora Forest Industries Ltd. ......................................................................................................160 Indexed as: R. v. Northwest Territories (Commissioner) #3 ...............................................................................168 Indexed as: Kostuch v. Alberta (Attorney General).............................................................................................183 Indexed as: R. v. Lerat.............................................................................................................................................197 IV Indexed as: R. v. Canada (Minister of National Defence)....................................................................................201 Indexed as: R. v. Agrifoods International Co-operative Ltd. ..............................................................................206 Indexed as: R. v. Northwest Territories (Commissioner) #4 ...............................................................................212 Indexed as: R. v. Oliver, Mangione, McCalla and Associates..............................................................................221 Indexed as: R. v. Rivtow Straits Ltd. (c.o.b. Pacific Rim Aggregates)................................................................226 Indexed as: R. v. Bremner .......................................................................................................................................241 Indexed as: R. v. Fletcher Challenge Canada Ltd. ...............................................................................................247 Indexed as: R. v. West Fraser Mills Ltd. #2 ............................................................................................................254 Indexed as: R. v. Boise Cascade Canada Ltd. .......................................................................................................264 Indexed as: R. v. Northwest Territories (Commissioner) #5 ...............................................................................272 Indexed as: R. v. Jackson ........................................................................................................................................295 Indexed as: R. v. Suncor..........................................................................................................................................297 Indexed as: R. v. Northwest Territories (Commissioner) #6 ...............................................................................316 Indexed as: Standard Trust Co. (In liquidation) v. Lindsay Holdings Ltd. .......................................................332 V PREFACE This is the 6th volume of the Fisheries Pollution Reports published by Environment Canada. Volume 6 includes Canadian court cases for 1992, 1993 and 1994 which consider one or more of sections 34-42, inclusive, of the Fisheries Act. Volume 6 of the Fisheries Pollution Report was prepared by the Environmental Law Centre under contract to Environment Canada. The advice and support of Glenn Hamilton and David Noseworthy in the Regional Office of Environment Canada in Edmonton, and Paul Gavrel in the National Office of Environment Canada in Ottawa was appreciated. Both Rob Patzer and Ian Zaharko provided invaluable assistance. The completion of Volume 6 of the Fisheries Pollution Report required the involvement of a number of Environmental Law Centre staff: Dolores Noga, librarian, Tammy Allsup, office manager, Debbie Lindskoog, secretary-receptionist and Shannon Keehn,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Affront to the Charter and Canada's Collective Conscience?
    COMMENTAIRE CANADA'S NEW IMMIGRATION ACT: AN AFFRONT TO THE CHARTER AND CANADA'S COLLECTIVE CONSCIENCE? 1994 CanLIIDocs 114 par Mark Anthony DRUMBL* Cet article examinera la constitutionnalité du paragraphe 46.01(1) et du sous-alinéa 19(1)(c.1)(i) de la Loi sur l’immigration. Le paragraphe 46.01(1) prévoit que sont désormais exclus du processus de détermination du statut de réfugié au Canada tous ceux qui sont passés par un tiers pays «sûr» pour arriver au Canada, à la seule exception de ceux qui ne s’y trouvaient qu’en vue d’un vol de correspondance. En vertu de l’art. 19(1)(c.1)(i), toute revendication du statut de réfugié au Canada est irrecevable si l’intéressé a commis une infraction criminelle dans son pays d'origine. L’auteur soutient que ces dispositions violent les garanties procédurales de justice fondamentale prévues à l'article 7 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. De plus, il soulève la possibilité que les droits conférés aux articles 11(d), 11(g), 12, 14 et 15(1) sont également enfreints par la Loi sur l’immigration. Ensuite, il aborde la question de savoir si ces violations constituent des limites raisonnables au sens de l’article premier de la Charte. Etant donné que les questions relatives à la politique d’immigration se trouvent actuellement au centre de nos débats de société, il devient de plus en plus difficile de maintenir l'équilibre entre les buts de la Loi et les obligations imposées sur le Canada par la Charte et par la Convention des nations unies relative aux réfugiés.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Spring / Summer 1991
    nnhtntnns Bulletin Spring / Summer 1991 ALMAE MATRIS CROATICAE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF CROATIAN UNIVERSITIES CANADA - U.S. GAUDEAMUS THE NEWSIfTTER FOR GRADUATES AND FRIENDS OF THE CROATIAN UNIVERSITIES Voiumel, Number 3 Spring/Summer 1991 PERSPECTIVE EttwhOM KiaSlezic MlwUAsdsiMi SponmibiPanc WdcofiK to the third edition of Gaudeamus, the Almae CMlrikrttai Utmt SojeaMo Ftonetowc Matris Croaticae Alumni ( AMCA), newsletler. Between the qeHia Debush Sncb Kerelonc changes in our association, many constants remain provid­ Art CMMUMI NevenCanic ing a sense of continuity with the past and a positive attitude Uvisary CMMM** Višnja Bicic about the future. hnHnoic Davot Gwnwold Our venture with its new look has broadened to encom­ EAwM CMsdrntf June Engel pass the whole North American continent and will form a UnrvenUyofToiDnto bridge with students and graduates of all Croatian universi­ Trygve Bmtteteig ties, in the U.S. as well as in Canada. The ultimate aim is to Scorbcrough PuUic Ubraiy becomeaunited organization spanning the continents rather rroJKÜM IMS Cieot'ive Conmuoications than consisting of dispersed, individual chapters. We are UniveisitY of Toronto Piiitkf MC Reproductions acutely asvaie that there is still avery longway to go. But there Printed in Canada is a new air of hopefulness about ourprospects and a willing­ ness to admit past mistakes, which augurs well for the future. GMJCOM« is pubkbed four times a year by HM Mnm Motr's Cnaficoe Alumni Associotioii of olunni ond We also hope to participate in affiliated institutional affairs frimds of Gaotbn UMWuitits, Canada ond tti« U.S. and form a Mason with international academic organiza­ tions, in order to strengthen our University's academic The bulletin addresses itself to political developments Gfoduotes and friends of Hi« Croolion uninnities mceiv« Hie profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Kemano Hydroelectric Development, BC
    Canadian Geotechnical Society Canadian Geotechnical Achievements 2017 Kemano Hydroelectric Development Kenney Dam; Kemano Tunnel and Powerhouse Geographical location Key References Lawton FL. 1953. The Kemano-Kitimat Hydro- South of Kitimat, British Columbia Electric Power Development. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, Vol 101, pp 887-909. Reports for Aluminum Company of Canada When it began or was completed Ltd: Dolmage V. 1951. Geology of the Kemano- Began in 1951; completed in 1954 Tahtsa Tunnel. Dolmage V and Campbell DD. 1961. Kemano Tunnel Inspection and Repair Why a Canadian geotechnical achievement? 1961 – Geology. See also: When initiated in 1951, this project was the largest hydroelectric http://www.kitimatmuseum.ca/node/3 power development ever financed with private capital. Its completion in 1954 coincided with the completion of the aluminum smelter in Kitimat. The short construction period is Photographs (permission pending) just one of many feats of this project that was built in the remote coastal mountains of BC with no road access. When completed, the associated Kenney Dam (97 m high and 457 m wide along the top) across the Nechako River was the 3rd highest rock fill dam in the world. The 16 km long Kemano tunnel provided almost 800 m of head to the underground powerhouse. The tunnel and underground powerhouse required excavation of 13.3 million m3 of rock. Tunneling advance-rate records were set and the underground powerhouse was the largest underground development in the world, at that time. This massive engineering project had unprecedented logistical Kenney Dam construction, October 1952. Kitimat challenges and costs, which required a very large workforce and Museum photo #00016.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers at Risk: the Status of Environmental Flows in Canada
    Rivers at Risk: The Status of Environmental Flows in Canada Prepared by: Becky Swainson, MA Research Consultant Prepared for: WWF-Canada Freshwater Program Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable contributions of the river advocates and professionals from across Canada who lent their time and insights to this assessment. Also, special thanks to Brian Richter, Oliver Brandes, Tim Morris, David Schindler, Tom Le Quesne and Allan Locke for their thoughtful reviews. i Rivers at Risk Acronyms BC British Columbia CBM Coalbed methane CEMA Cumulative Effects Management Association COSEWIC Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada CRI Canadian Rivers Institute DFO Fisheries and Oceans Canada EBF Ecosystem base flow IBA Important Bird Area IFN Instream flow needs IJC International Joint Commission IPP Independent Power Producer GRCA Grand River Conservation Authority LWR Low Water Response MOE Ministry of Environment (Ontario) MNR Ministry of Natural Resources (Ontario) MRBB Mackenzie River Basin Board MW Megawatt NB New Brunswick NGO Non-governmental organization NWT Northwest Territories P2FC Phase 2 Framework Committee PTTW Permit to Take Water QC Quebec RAP Remedial Action Plan SSRB South Saskatchewan River Basin UNESCO United Nations Environmental, Scientific and Cultural Organization US United States WCO Water Conservation Objectives ii Rivers at Risk Contents Rivers at Risk: The Status of Environmental Flows in Canada CONTENTS Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Release Facility at Kenney Dam Updated Conceptual Layout and Cost Estimate
    WATER RELEASE FACILITY AT KENNEY DAM UPDATED CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT AND COST ESTIMATE Prepared for: NECHAKO ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT FUND MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE by: Report No.: KC-155 (PP1229) May 2001 Klohn Crippen NEEF - Water Release Facility at Kenney Dam Updated Conceptual Layout and Cost Estimate Water Release Facility at Kenney Dam Updated Conceptual Layout and Cost Estimate Original signed and sealed by C. J. Wilson, 18 May 2001 Prepared By: Chris Wilson, P.Eng. Project Manager Original signed and sealed by N. Heidstra, 18 May 2001 Reviewed By: Neil Heidstra, P.Eng. Chief Engineer Report No.: KC-155 May 2001 Klohn Crippen NEEF - Water Release Facility at Kenney Dam Updated Conceptual Layout and Cost Estimate TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE DISCLAIMER ....................................................................................................................... iii 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Terms Of Reference ................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Scope Of Work............................................................................................ 1-2 2. CRITERIA .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Basic Configuration....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Donateurs Individuels De La Fondation De L'uqam Dons
    DONATEURS INDIVIDUELS DE LA FONDATION DE L’UQAM DONS CUMULATIFS DANS LE CADRE DE LA CAMPAGNE MAJEURE (2015-2022) En date du 25 septembre 2019 Donateurs individuels de 25 000 $ à 49 999 $ Sylvie Corbeil (EDU 11) Donateurs individuels de 500 000 $ et plus 4 donateurs anonymes Pierre Bélanger René Côté (SPD 82) 2 donateurs anonymes Livain Breau Pierre Couture (SPD 75) Patrick Pichette (ESG 87) Hugo Cyr Charles-Philippe David Robert Sheitoyan Bernard Derome Robert Derome (COM 72) Robert Wares Catherine Foisy (SPD 06) Gilbert Dionne Alfred Halasa René Ferland Donateurs individuels de 100 000 $ à 499 999 $ Francine Jacques Erik Fortier Maryse Arpin et Jean-Claude Arpin Lynn Jeanniot (ESG 93) Alain-G. Gagnon Gérard Bélanger et Anne Bélanger Guy Joron* Richard L. Guay Jenny Desrochers (ESG 03) Yves Lavoie (EDU 72) Jean-Pierre Hamel (SCI 86) Jean-Marc Eustache (ESG 75) Benoît Lévesque Jean-Marie Lafortune (HUM 04) Éric Girard (ESG 93) Michel Lizée Anne Laperrière Pierre J. Jeanniot Michel-Pierre Montet Danielle Laramée (ESG 83) Claire Léger (ESG 84) Aude Moreau (ART 10) Michèle Lemieux Mario Merola Lori A. Morris* Noël Mallette Pierre Mongeau et Johanne Saint-Charles (COM 01) Theodora Newton Christine Métayer Anne Rochette Yann Pocreau Pierre Parent Madeleine St-Martin Jean-Claude Robert Denise Pelletier Serge Robert Robert Petrelli Donateurs individuels de 50 000 $ à 99 999 $ Marie-Andrée Roy (HUM 92) Claude Armand Piché (HUM 99) 1 donateur anonyme Serge Piotte (ESG 74) Antje Bettin Donateurs individuels de 10 000 $ à 24 999 $ Pierre Poirier
    [Show full text]
  • Geography of British Columbia People and Landscapes in Transition 4Th Edition
    Geography of British Columbia People and Landscapes in Transition 4th Edition Brett McGillivray Contents Preface / ix Introduction / 3 PART 1: GEOGRAPHICAL FOUNDATIONS 1 British Columbia, a Region of Regions / 11 2 Physical Processes and Human Implications / 29 3 Geophysical Hazards and Their Risks / 51 4 Resource Development and Management / 71 PART 2: THE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 5 “Discovering” Indigenous Lands and Shaping a Colonial Landscape / 85 6 Boom and Bust from Confederation to the Early 1900s / 103 7 Resource Dependency and Racism in an Era of Global Chaos / 117 8 Changing Values during the Postwar Boom / 137 9 Resource Uncertainty in the Late Twentieth Century / 153 10 The Twenty-First-Century Liberal Landscape / 177 Conclusion / 201 Acknowledgments / 214 Glossary / 215 Further Readings / 224 Photo Credits / 228 Index / 229 Introduction he geography of British Columbia is in constant place on it the features you consider important. This flux. Between 2014 and 2017 alone, the following cognitive mapping exercise reveals individual land- T events occurred, transforming the landscape and scape experiences (which can be shared with others) and the way people engage with it: demonstrates the importance of location. Using maps to answer “where” questions is the easiest aspect of geo- • Heat waves shattered temperature records, and wild- graphical study. fires devasted parts of the province, causing thousands Answering the question “Why are things where they to flee their homes. are?” is more complicated. “Why” questions are far more • Fracking triggered large quakes in the oil and gas difficult than “where” questions and may ultimately verge patch. on the metaphysical.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission To: Northern Gateway Joint Review Panel
    Submission to: Northern Gateway Joint Review Panel This report was produced by the Office of Wet’suwet’en Natural Resources Department on behalf of all past and present Wet’suwet’en. This report was produced under serious time, money, and capacity constraints. Until such time as Wet’suwet’en title and rights are formally recognized or a treaty successfully concluded with the Crown, the statement of Wet’suwet’en title and rights and their potential infringements must, as the Supreme Court of Canada said in Haida Nation, constitute an interim and preliminary statement of Wet’suwet’en title and rights, not a final one. The Office of the Wet’suwet’en retains all copyright and ownership rights to this submission, which cannot be utilized without written permission. © 2011 The Office of the Wet’suwet’en. 2 | Page Submission to Northern Gateway JRP Submission Summary 1.0 Scope & Approach 1. The Office of the Wet’suwet’en (OW) presents this submission to the Northern Gateway Joint Review Panel. This submission is a component of the Wet’suwet’en response in respect of the proposed Northern Gateway project within Wet’suwet’en territory. 2. The Wet’suwet’en are stewards of the land. They are here to protect their traditional territories and to ensure that future generations of Wet’suwet’en are able to live and benefit from all that their ancestral land provides. The Wet’suwet’en are not opposed to commercial and economic development on their traditional territories as long as the proper cultural protocol is followed and respect given.
    [Show full text]
  • Lheidli T'enneh Perspectives on Resource Development
    THE PARADOX OF DEVELOPMENT: LHEIDLI T'ENNEH PERSPECTIVES ON RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT by Geoffrey E.D. Hughes B.A., Northern Studies, University of Northern British Columbia, 2002 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN FIRST NATIONS STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2011 © Geoffrey Hughes, 2011 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1 Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87547-6 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87547-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3.1.3A AIR Tracking Tables
    BLACKWATER GOLD PROJECT APPLICATION FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS Appendix 3.1.3A AIR Tracking Tables Section 3 BLACKWATER GOLD PROJECT DRAFT APPLICATION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS COMMENTS FROM ABORIGINAL GROUPS Draft Comment Date of dAIR Version AIR Author of Comment Comment Proponent Response Action dAIR EAO Comment/ ID # Comment Reference Version Status 1. C May 24, 2013 Jackie Thomas Section 5.1 Environmental It's my assumption that there will be a baseline of historical Comment noted. Version D: No action required. Satisfied (April 2013) Saik’uz First Nation Baseline rainfall for the study area as well as the links to the soil Follow-up response: 5.1.1.1: Climate instability from the Mountain Pine Beetle epidemic that went through this area? On May 6, 2013 meeting was held with the Saik’uz First Nation to Version G: No change required. Section 5.1.3 Terrestrial discuss this matter. At the time, no follow-up action was identified with respect to response. The scope and process of the assessment was explained. It was also noted that historic climate information will be presented in Section 5.1.1.1 Climate. Terrain stability and baseline conditions will be described under Section 5.1.3.2 Soils and Terrain. The current condition of the vegetation will be described in Section 5.1.3.3 Vegetation and will take into account logging activities and the effects of the Mountain Pine Beetle epidemic. 2. C May 24, 2013 Jackie Thomas Section 5.1.3.4 Wildlife and In terms of amphibians listed, I didn't see any reference to Comment noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Location: Meeting Schedule
    Association of PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS & GEOSCIENTISTS of British Columbia APEGBC Council Meetings Friday, February 10, 2017 Location: Dan Lambert Boardroom, 2nd Floor (Large Room, Upstairs) APEGBC Offices, 200 – 4010 Regent Street, Burnaby, BC Meeting Schedule: 08:30 – 08:55 Closed Session 08:55 – 10:25 Open Session 10:25 – 10:40 Morning Break 10:40 – 12:55 Open Session (continued) 12:55 – 13:55 Lunch 13:55 – 14:55 In-Camera Session For more information, contact Sarah Wray at [email protected] or 604.412.4896. Association of PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS & GEOSCIENTISTS of British Columbia Council Agenda – Open Session Friday, February 10, 2017 Dan Lambert Boardroom, 2nd Floor (Large Room, Upstairs) APEGBC Offices, 200 – 4010 Regent Street, Burnaby, BC 08:55 – 12:55 08:55 3. OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER (5 min) Chair: Bob Stewart, P.Eng. President 3.1. Declaration of Conflict of Interest 09:00 4. OPEN CONSENT AGENDA (20 min) MOTION: That Council approve all items (4.1 to 4.4) on the Open Consent Agenda. 4.1. November 25, 2016 Open Minutes Open Minutes Nov 25, 2016 MOTION: That Council approve the November 25, 2016 Open Meeting minutes as circulated. 4.2. Appointments Approval MOTION: That Council approves the recommended appointments and re-appointments to APEGBC Volunteer Groups and to outside Organizations, as applicable. 4.3. APEGBC Professional Practice Guidelines – Flood Mapping in Flood Mapping BC Guideline MOTION: That Council approve the APEGBC Professional Practice Guidelines – Flood Mapping in BC for final editorial and legal review prior to publication. Lindsay Steele, P.Geo., Practice Advisor, Professional Practice, Standards & Development 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, May 9, 1994
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 066 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, May 9, 1994 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, May 9, 1994 The House met at 11 a.m. The current debate on Bill C–22 conducted with competence and determination by the Official Opposition is instructive as its _______________ purpose is to demonstrate clearly that the lax federal regulations in effect concerning political party financing goes against our Prayers society’s fundamental interests. _______________ The traditional Oppositions of the 34 previous Parliaments were justifiably reluctant to point the finger at the friends of the government in office since the stronger the accusations the more GOVERNMENT ORDERS likely they were to turn against them. The Official Opposition of the 35th Parliament, of whom I am a member, has demonstrated [Translation] that the lack of legislation on democratic party financing can only create a vicious circle with a simple, obvious logic. PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AGREEMENTS ACT This logic is as follows: no one has the right to bite the hand The House resumed from May 6 consideration of the motion that feeds him, the government least of all. The contributions that Bill C–22, an act respecting certain agreements concerning made by large corporations to the election funds of the tradition- the redevelopment and operation of terminals 1 and 2 at Lester al federal parties, far from being an open secret, are considered B. Pearson International Airport, be read the second time and as essential as bread and butter by this government. But there is referred to a committee; and of the amendment.
    [Show full text]