DOCSLIB.ORG

Unit 6 in Entomology [1] Unit Six. Reception and Integration: the Insect Nervous System. [2] in This Unit, You'll Need to Desc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unit 6 in Entomology [1] Unit Six. Reception and Integration: the Insect Nervous System. [2] in This Unit, You'll Need to Desc Unit 6 in Entomology [1] Unit six. Reception and Integration: The Insect Nervous System. [2] In this unit, you'll need to describe the origin of the insect nervous system, identify the major structures of the insect nervous system and describe their function, compare and contrast the physical structure and functions of compound eyes and simple eyes, differentiate between the two types of simple eyes and describe the four types of mechanical receptors insects possess. [3] Have you ever thought about how insects receive information from their environment? We use all of our five senses, but what about insects? Think about this. Do they have eyes? Yeah, mostly. Do they have a nose? The answer may seem obvious to you: insects don't have noses, but have you ever thought about how they smell or do they even smell? Well, yes, they do. They have receptors on their antenna and other parts of their body to pick up scents. In order to understand how an insect picks up a scent, let's first look at how humans do it. [4] Someone is baking luscious bread in the kitchen. As you walk by the kitchen, chemical molecules mixed with the steam waft up from the cooking food and enter your nose. The molecules then bind to tiny hairs in the nasal cavity. These hairs are extensions of olfactory nerve cells. Nerve cells are also called neurons. The binding of the chemical causes your olfactory nerves to fire and send a message to your brain. There, the brain interprets the message and fires another nerve cell in response that stimulates your salivary glands. You begin to salivate and you're ready to eat. [5] Insects smell in a similar way. Their olfactory neurons are not enclosed in a nasal cavity, but within their antennae, mouthparts or even their legs. When a female moth sends out a chemical to attract a mate, the male moth picks up the chemical molecules with his antennae, where his olfactory neurons are located. These neurons fire a message to his brain which interprets the signal and stimulates neurons that cause the male to fly, migrating towards the female's scent. If you take a look at the diagram below, you can see the moth. Male moths usually have very large antennae and these antennae have small projections on the sides you can see where they can pick up of lots and lots of scent. If you look at diagram C, you can see an enlargement of the tip of one of the branches showing all of the olfactory hairs on the end of the antenna. [6] The insect nervous system arises during embryonic development from cells called neuroblasts, located in the ectoderm. These neuroblasts first developed into a mass of nerve called a ganglion. Two ganglia form in each segment and they begin to connect with each other as neuron fibers grow out from each ganglion. If you take a look at the diagram on the right, you see a representation of nervous system development. At the top you see the neuroblast formation. In the middle the neuroblasts form ganglia and then the ganglia interconnect. And then by C, you have ganglia fusion. So, as insects become more and more advanced, they have more and more ganglia fusion. Notice that insects are segmented and there's a mass of nerve cells within each segment. [7] Speaking of ganglia fusion, as development continues the first three ganglia pair eventually fuse to form a structure called the supraesophageal ganglion. Notice the word esophagus there, so supraesophageal ganglion. And the fourth through sixth pairs fuse to form the subesophageal ganglion. The remaining ganglion pairs fuse and form the ventral nerve cord. In some highly evolved or specialized insects, all the ganglia will fuse to form one large mass in the head and prothorax. This ganglia fusion can be seen in water striders. The primitive thysanurans, the silverfish, show very little fusion. [8] The insect nervous system is ventrally located, running from the head down below the digestive system. The supraesophageal ganglion, as its name implies, lies above the esophagus. It's made up of three main lobes: the protocerebrum, the deutocerebrum and the tritocerebrum. We'll discuss each of their functions on the next slide. The subesophageal ganglion is located below the esophagus. It coordinates and controls the maxilla, mandibles and the labium—all parts of the mouth. This makes sense since the ganglion is located so close to these structures. If you take a look at the diagram below, you can see some of the different ganglia and which of the insect structures they innervate. You can see the eyes, the optic nerve, you can see some of the mouth parts. The pharynx, some of the digestive system, you can see the parts of the heart at the top of the diagram. [9] Let's take a look at the supraesophageal ganglion functions. The protocerebrum receives and processes nerve signals from the insect's eyes then interprets the message and sends a response. The deutocerebrum receives impulses from the antenna, interprets the message and controls the movement of the antenna. As a male moth detects pheromones with his antenna, the antennal nerves send a message to the deutocerebrum. This lobe will then fire the appropriate neurons to get the male moth moving towards the female. The tritocerebrum receives input from the labium nerves, subesophageal ganglion and assists in controlling the digestive, circulatory, and endocrine systems. It helps control the corpora allata, which is the endocrine gland which secretes juvenile hormone, so part of the function is in molting. [10] So let's take a look at exactly how these nerves are put together. For some background information, please refer to your textbook and fill out the study guide section about the nervous system. Take a look at the diagram to your right to see how a nerve is put together. The cell body of the neuron that contains the nucleus and the typical cellular organelles is called the soma. The long, thin cytoplasmic extension that conducts the nerve impulse is called the axon and the region of information input is called the dendrite. Neurons serve as information highways within the insect’s body and they may be unipolar with one end, bipolar with two or multipolar with many ends. These cells generate electrical impulses called action potentials that travel as waves of depolarization along the cell’s membrane. Every one of the neurons has the nerve body, the soma, and have the dendrites and axons that propagate the action potential. That just means it continues it on from nerve to nerve to nerve until an action is met. This happens because individual nerve cells connect with one another through special junctions called synapses. When a nerve impulse reaches the synapse, it releases a chemical messenger. This is called a neurotransmitter and this chemical messenger defuses across the gap, the synapse, and triggers a new impulse in the next dendrite of one or more connecting neurons. Nerve cells are generally found grouped in bundles, and a nerve is simply a bundle of these dendrites or axons that serve the same part of the body. A ganglion is a dense cluster of interconnected neurons that process sensory information or control motor output. So let's take a look at some of the functions of the nervous system. [11] The first system we’ll tackle as insect vision. As with most other animals, insect eyes are located at the anterior end of the body. There are three kinds of insect eyes: they’re the compound and two simple eyes. The ocelli and the stemmata. Let's begin with the simple eyes. If you take a look at the picture of the ant head, you can see the three ocelli right in the center of the head. This is an example of the simple eyes. [12] Ocelli are usually located on the frons or on the top of the head. They can be seen on nymphs or on adult insects. Each ocellus is made up of a corneal lens, several rhabdoms and neurons. Light is focused by the lens onto color pigments located in the rhabdoms. The light hitting the color pigments causes a chemical reaction which fires neurons surrounding the rhabdoms. Impulses pass down the axon and are sent to the protocerebrum. There they are processed and the insect accomplishes vision. Pigment cells surround the outer rim of the rhabdom cluster. These pigment cells shield surrounding structures from the piercing light rays. Ocelli do not form clear images, but are most likely used to detect changes in light, such as when a shadow is cast by an approaching predator. If you take a look at the diagrams below, you can see the simple eyes located in a caterpillar, in a stinkbug, and in a cicada. Notice how they are located on the top of the head, to protect it from predators. On the right-hand side, you see a longitudinal section through the rhabdoms in a simple eye. Notice the corneal lens, the groupings of rhabdoms, the pigment cells, and then at the bottom you’ll see the nerve attachment. [13] If you noticed in the diagram we just looked at, there were two types of simple eyes: the stemmata and the ocelli. Now let's take a look at the stemmata. They’re structurally an intermediate between the ocelli and the more complex compound eyes. They have a corneal lens, but only have one rhabdom. You only see stemmata on caterpillars and the larva of other holometabolous insects.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Observations on the Springtail Leaping Organ and Jumping Mechanism Worked by a Spring
    Observations on the Springtail Leaping Organ and Jumping Mechanism Worked by a Spring Seiichi Sudo a*, Masahiro Shiono a, Toshiya Kainuma a, Atsushi Shirai b, and Toshiyuki Hayase b a Faculty of Systems Science and Technology, Akita Prefectural University, Japan b Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University, Japan Abstract— This paper is concerned with a small In this paper, the springtail leaping organ was jumping mechanism. Microscopic observations of observed with confocal laser scanning microscopy. A springtail leaping organs were conducted using a jumping mechanism using a spring and small confocal leaser scanning microscope. A simple electromagnet was produced based on the observations springtail mechanism using a spring and small of leaping organ and the jumping analysis of the electromagnet was produced based on the observations springtail. of leaping organ and the jumping analysis of the globular springtail. Jumping characteristics of the mechanism were examined with high-speed video II. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD camera system. A. Microscopic Observations Index Terms—Jumping Mechanism, Leaping Organ, Globular springtails are small insects that reach Springtail, Morphology, Jumping Characteristics around 1 mm in size. They have the jumping organ (furcula), which can be folded under the abdomen. Muscular action releasing the furcula can throw the I. INTRODUCTION insect well out of the way of predators. Jumping in insect movement is an effective way to In this paper, microscopic observations of the furcula escape predators, find food, and change locations. were conducted using the confocal laser scanning Grasshoppers, fleas, bush crickets, katydids, and locusts microscope. Confocal laser scanning microscopy is are particularly well known for jumping mechanisms to fluorescence – imaging technique that produces move around.
    [Show full text]
  • Visions & Reflections on the Origin of Smell: Odorant Receptors in Insects
    Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63 (2006) 1579–1585 1420-682X/06/141579-7 DOI 10.1007/s00018-006-6130-7 Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences © Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2006 Visions & Reflections On the ORigin of smell: odorant receptors in insects R. Benton Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 63, New York, New York 10021 (USA), Fax: +1 212 327 7238, e-mail: [email protected] Received 23 March 2006; accepted 28 April 2006 Online First 19 June 2006 Abstract. Olfaction, the sense of smell, depends on large, suggested that odours are perceived by a conserved mecha- divergent families of odorant receptors that detect odour nism. Here I review recent revelations of significant struc- stimuli in the nose and transform them into patterns of neu- tural and functional differences between the Drosophila ronal activity that are recognised in the brain. The olfactory and mammalian odorant receptor proteins and discuss the circuits in mammals and insects display striking similarities implications for our understanding of the evolutionary and in their sensory physiology and neuroanatomy, which has molecular biology of the insect odorant receptors. Keywords. Olfaction, odorant receptor, signal transduction, GPCR, neuron, insect, mammal, evolution. Olfaction: the basics characterised by the presence of seven membrane-span- ning segments with an extracellular N terminus. OR pro- Olfaction is used by most animals to extract vital infor- teins are exposed to odours on the ciliated endings of olf- mation from volatile chemicals in the environment, such actory sensory neuron (OSN) dendrites in the olfactory as the presence of food or predators.
    [Show full text]
  • Constant Neuropilar Ratio in the Insect Brain Alexey A
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Constant neuropilar ratio in the insect brain Alexey A. Polilov* & Anastasia A. Makarova Revealing scaling rules is necessary for understanding the morphology, physiology and evolution of living systems. Studies of animal brains have revealed both general patterns, such as Haller’s rule, and patterns specifc for certain animal taxa. However, large-scale studies aimed at studying the ratio of the entire neuropil and the cell body rind in the insect brain have never been performed. Here we performed morphometric study of the adult brain in 37 insect species of 26 families and ten orders, ranging in volume from the smallest to the largest by a factor of more than 4,000,000, and show that all studied insects display a similar ratio of the volume of the neuropil to the cell body rind, 3:2. Allometric analysis for all insects shows that the ratio of the volume of the neuropil to the volume of the brain changes strictly isometrically. Analyses within particular taxa, size groups, and metamorphosis types also reveal no signifcant diferences in the relative volume of the neuropil; isometry is observed in all cases. Thus, we establish a new scaling rule, according to which the relative volume of the entire neuropil in insect brain averages 60% and remains constant. Large-scale studies of animal proportions supposedly started with the publication D’Arcy Wentworth Tompson’s book Growth and Forms1. In fact, the frst studies on the subject appeared long before the book (e.g.2), but it was Tomson’s work that laid the foundations for this discipline, which, following the studies of Julian Huxley 3,4, became a major fundamental and applied area of science5–8.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Nervous Systems and Brains 2
    Evolution of Nervous Systems and Brains 2 Gerhard Roth and Ursula Dicke The modern theory of biological evolution, as estab- drift”) is incomplete; they point to a number of other lished by Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace and perhaps equally important mechanisms such as in the middle of the nineteenth century, is based on (i) neutral gene evolution without natural selection, three interrelated facts: (i) phylogeny – the common (ii) mass extinctions wiping out up to 90 % of existing history of organisms on earth stretching back over 3.5 species (such as the Cambrian, Devonian, Permian, and billion years, (ii) evolution in a narrow sense – Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinctions) and (iii) genetic modi fi cations of organisms during phylogeny and and epigenetic-developmental (“ evo - devo ”) self-canal- underlying mechanisms, and (iii) speciation – the ization of evolutionary processes [ 2 ] . It remains uncer- process by which new species arise during phylogeny. tain as to which of these possible processes principally Regarding the phylogeny, it is now commonly accepted drive the evolution of nervous systems and brains. that all organisms on Earth are derived from a com- mon ancestor or an ancestral gene pool, while contro- versies have remained since the time of Darwin and 2.1 Reconstruction of the Evolution Wallace about the major mechanisms underlying the of Nervous Systems and Brains observed modi fi cations during phylogeny (cf . [1 ] ). The prevalent view of neodarwinism (or better In most cases, the reconstruction of the evolution of “new” or “modern evolutionary synthesis”) is charac- nervous systems and brains cannot be based on fossil- terized by the assumption that evolutionary changes ized material, since their soft tissues decompose, but are caused by a combination of two major processes, has to make use of the distribution of neural traits in (i) heritable variation of individual genomes within a extant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless and Battery-Free Technologies for Neuroengineering
    REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00683-3 Wireless and battery-free technologies for neuroengineering Sang Min Won1,14, Le Cai2,14, Philipp Gutruf 2,3,4 ✉ and John A. Rogers 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 ✉ Tethered and battery-powered devices that interface with neural tissues can restrict natural motions and prevent social interac- tions in animal models, thereby limiting the utility of these devices in behavioural neuroscience research. In this Review Article, we discuss recent progress in the development of miniaturized and ultralightweight devices as neuroengineering platforms that are wireless, battery-free and fully implantable, with capabilities that match or exceed those of wired or battery-powered alter- natives. Such classes of advanced neural interfaces with optical, electrical or fluidic functionality can also combine recording and stimulation modalities for closed-loop applications in basic studies or in the practical treatment of abnormal physiological processes. dvances in electronic, optoelectronic and microfluidic inter- systems that exploit schemes in wireless power transfer, communi- faces with living biosystems serve as foundations for ver- cation and digital control to support applications in neuroscience satile devices capable of interrogating and modulating the research and more generally in the monitoring of broad types of A 1–5 31–33 behaviour of the central and peripheral nervous systems . Beyond physiological processes . their use in fundamental research, interfaces to neural tissues are Commonly used
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of the Arthropod Mandible
    Origin of the arthropod mandible SIR - Arthropods, vast in number and for investigating the structure of the with enormous variation in body forms, mandibles (whole limb versus limb base are a fascinating group. We have found only). In the millipede Oxidus gracilis (a in that myriapods (millipedes, centipedes the figure), Dll is expressed in the distal and allies) have different mandibular ori­ part of the mandibles, as predicted in ref. gins from insects and crustaceans, which is 4, indicating their whole-limb structure. of consequence for resolving phylogenetic In light of the recent discovery of the relationships among major groups of Cambrian fossil whose head and trunk arthropods. appendages were long and Ieg-like8, the For more than a century, the phylo­ whole-limb mandibles of today's myriapods genetic relationships among the main probably represent an ancestral arthropod arthropod lineages have been a topic of state. Thus, we have a testable hypothesis: lively discussion. Almost every imaginable if myriapods and insects are indeed sister combination has been proposed, but at taxa, then Dll should also be expressed in present only two hypotheses are seriously insect mandibles. But Panganiban et al. 9 considered: the 'TCC' view, which sepa­ have shown that Dll is not expressed in rates trilobites, crustaceans and cheliccr­ mandibles of modem insects. To examine ates from the rest of the arthropods1, and whether the absence of Dll is characteristic the 'mandibulate' theory, which groups of the whole insect lineage, we included in together crustaceans, insects and myri­ our analysis the primitively wingless insect apods2. One feature is common to both: Thennobia domestica, and found that Dll is the close relationship between myriapods not expressed in the mandibles of this and insects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Development of Arthropod Appendages
    Evolving Form and Function: Fossils and Development Proceedings of a symposium honoring Adolf Seilacher for his contributions to paleontology, in celebration of his 80th birthday Derek E. G. Briggs, Editor April 1– 2, 2005 New Haven, Connecticut A Special Publication of the Peabody Museum of Natural History Yale University New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A. December 2005 Evolving Form and Function: Fossils and Development Proceedings of a symposium honoring Adolf Seilacher for his contributions to paleontology, in celebration of his 80th birthday A Special Publication of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University Derek E.G. Briggs, Editor These papers are the proceedings of Evolving Form and Function: Fossils and Development, a symposium held on April 1–2, 2005, at Yale University. Yale Peabody Museum Publications Jacques Gauthier, Curatorial Editor-in-Chief Lawrence F. Gall, Executive Editor Rosemary Volpe, Publications Editor Joyce Gherlone, Publications Assistant Design by Rosemary Volpe • Index by Aardvark Indexing Cover: Fossil specimen of Scyphocrinites sp., Upper Silurian, Morocco (YPM 202267). Purchased for the Yale Peabody Museum by Dr. Seilacher. Photograph by Jerry Domian. © 2005 Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. All rights reserved. Frontispiece: Photograph of Dr. Adolf Seilacher by Wolfgang Gerber. Used with permission. All rights reserved. In addition to occasional Special Publications, the Yale Peabody Museum publishes the Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Postilla and the Yale University Publications in Anthropology. A com- plete list of titles, along with submission guidelines for contributors, can be obtained from the Yale Peabody Museum website or requested from the Publications Office at the address below.
    [Show full text]
  • Antennal Vibrations in Mosquitoes 2729 the Loudspeaker and the Preparation, It Was Therefore Necessary 1000 to Measure the Particle Velocity Directly
    The Journal of Experimental Biology 202, 2727–2738 (1999) 2727 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1999 JEB2230 MOSQUITO HEARING: SOUND-INDUCED ANTENNAL VIBRATIONS IN MALE AND FEMALE AEDES AEGYPTI MARTIN C. GÖPFERT*, HANS BRIEGEL AND DANIEL ROBERT Institute for Zoology, Laboratory of Bioacoustics, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland *e-mail: [email protected] Accepted 26 July; published on WWW 30 September 1999 Summary Male mosquitoes are attracted by the flight sounds of flight sounds. The antennal hairs of males are resonantly conspecific females. In males only, the antennal flagellum tuned to frequencies between approximately 2600 and bears a large number of long hairs and is therefore said to 3100 Hz and are therefore stiffly coupled to, and move be plumose. As early as 1855, it was proposed that this together with, the flagellar shaft when stimulated at remarkable antennal anatomy served as a sound-receiving biologically relevant frequencies around 380 Hz. Because of structure. In the present study, the sound-induced this stiff coupling, forces acting on the hairs can be vibrations of the antennal flagellum in male and female transmitted to the shaft and thus to the auditory sensory Aedes aegypti were compared, and the functional organ at the base of the flagellum, a process that is proposed significance of the flagellar hairs for audition was examined. to improve acoustic sensitivity. Indeed, the mechanical In both males and females, the antennae are resonantly sensitivity of the male antenna not only exceeds the tuned mechanical systems that move as simple forced sensitivity of the female antenna but also those of all other damped harmonic oscillators when acoustically stimulated.
    [Show full text]
  • 140 Cor Frontale Supraesophageal Ganglion . . K Antennary Optic
    140 Cor Pyloric Dorsal frontalle stomach abdominal Supraesophageal art ry ganglion . K Ophthalmic / Ostium ® Antennary artery Cardiac / / Heart \ Segmental Optic \ artery i stomach/Cecum / / Hepato- \ artery nerve I / / / / / pancreas\ Hindgut Antennal nerve Rectum ganglion Hepatic artery Subesophageal Ventral Midgut ganglion nerve cord dorsomedial branchiocardiac dorsomedial Antenna Antennule intestinal / urogastric Compound eye posterior margina hepatic Th°racopods lateromarginal I inferior \ intercervical parabranchial postcervical B Uropod Telson Figure 47 Decapoda: A. Diagrammatic astacidean with gills and musculature removed to show major organ systems; B. Diagrammatic nephropoidean carapace illustrating carapace grooves [after Holthuis, 1974]; C. Phyllosoma larva. ORDER DECAPODA 141 midgut or the other, pierces the ventral nerve cord, and indistinct from the fused ganglia of the mandibles, maxil- then branches anteriorly and posteriorly. The anterior lulae, maxillae, and first 2 pairs of maxillipeds. The gang­ branch, the ventral thoracic artery, supplies blood to the lia of the first 3 pairs of pereopods are segmental; the mouthparts, nerve cord, and 1st 3 pairs of pereopods. ganglia of the 4th and 5th pairs lie very close together. The course of this artery cannot be traced until the Follow the ventral nerve cord into the abdomen and stomach and hepatic cecum have been removed. The identify the abdominal ganglia. posterior branch, the ventral abdominal artery, which Larval development is direct (epimorphic) in all fresh­ also should be traced later, provides blood to the 4th and water taxa; in marine taxa early developmental stages 5th pairs of pereopods, nerve cord, and parts of the ven­ are passed through in the egg and hatching usually occurs tral abdomen.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Fossil Data Increase Congruence of Morphological and Molecular Phylogenies
    ARTICLE Received 14 Jan 2013 | Accepted 21 Aug 2013 | Published 30 Sep 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3485 Arthropod fossil data increase congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies David A. Legg1,2,3, Mark D. Sutton1 & Gregory D. Edgecombe2 The relationships of major arthropod clades have long been contentious, but refinements in molecular phylogenetics underpin an emerging consensus. Nevertheless, molecular phylogenies have recovered topologies that morphological phylogenies have not, including the placement of hexapods within a paraphyletic Crustacea, and an alliance between myriapods and chelicerates. Here we show enhanced congruence between molecular and morphological phylogenies based on 753 morphological characters for 309 fossil and Recent panarthropods. We resolve hexapods within Crustacea, with remipedes as their closest extant relatives, and show that the traditionally close relationship between myriapods and hexapods is an artefact of convergent character acquisition during terrestrialisation. The inclusion of fossil morphology mitigates long-branch artefacts as exemplified by pycnogonids: when fossils are included, they resolve with euchelicerates rather than as a sister taxon to all other euarthropods. 1 Department of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Royal School of Mines, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 2 Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK. 3 Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.A.L. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 4:2485 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3485 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3485 rthropods are diverse, disparate, abundant and ubiqui- including all major extinct and extant panarthropod groups.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 Organization and Function of Drosophila Odorant Binding Proteins 6 7 8 9 10 Nikki K. Larter1,2, Jennifer S. Sun1
    1 2 3 4 5 6 Organization and Function of Drosophila Odorant Binding Proteins 7 8 9 10 11 Nikki K. Larter1,2, Jennifer S. Sun1, and John R. Carlson1,2* 12 1Dept. Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 13 2Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program 14 Yale University 15 New Haven, CT 06520 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 *corresponding author: [email protected] 2 24 ABSTRACT 25 Odorant binding proteins (Obps) are remarkable in their number, diversity, and 26 abundance, yet their role in olfactory coding remains unclear. They are widely believed to be 27 required for transporting hydrophobic odorants through an aqueous lymph to odorant receptors. 28 We construct a map of the Drosophila antenna, in which the abundant Obps are mapped to 29 olfactory sensilla with defined functions. The results lay a foundation for an incisive analysis of 30 Obp function. The map identifies a sensillum type that contains a single abundant Obp, Obp28a. 31 Surprisingly, deletion of the sole abundant Obp in these sensilla does not reduce the magnitude 32 of their olfactory responses. The results suggest that this Obp is not required for odorant 33 transport and that this sensillum does not require an abundant Obp. The results further suggest a 34 novel role for this Obp in buffering changes in the odor environment, perhaps providing a 35 molecular form of gain control. 36 37 38 INTRODUCTION 39 Like many animals, insects rely on their sense of smell to navigate through the 40 environment towards food sources and mates. The Drosophila antenna is covered with olfactory 41 sensilla that fall into three main morphological classes: basiconic, trichoid and coeloconic 42 sensilla (Figure 1A, B) (Shanbhag et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brain of the Remipedia (Crustacea) and an Alternative Hypothesis on Their Phylogenetic Relationships
    The brain of the Remipedia (Crustacea) and an alternative hypothesis on their phylogenetic relationships Martin Fanenbruck*†, Steffen Harzsch†‡§, and Johann Wolfgang Wa¨ gele* *Fakulta¨t Biologie, Ruhr-Universita¨t Bochum, Lehrstuhl fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie, 44780 Bochum, Germany; and ‡Sektion Biosystematische Dokumentation and Abteilung Neurobiologie, Universita¨t Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved December 16, 2003 (received for review September 26, 2003) Remipedia are rare and ancient mandibulate arthropods inhabiting ical study and reconstruction of the brain anatomy of Godzil- almost inaccessible submerged cave systems. Their phylogenetic liognomus frondosus Yager, 1989, (Remipedia, Godzilliidae) position is still enigmatic and the subject of extremely controver- from the Grand Bahama Island (12) followed by a discussion of sial debates. To contribute arguments to this discussion, we ana- ecological and phylogenetic implications. lyzed the brain of Godzilliognomus frondosus Yager, 1989 (Remi- pedia, Godzilliidae) and provide a detailed 3D reconstruction of its Methods anatomy. This reconstruction yielded the surprising finding that in The cephalothorax of a formalin-fixed Godzilliognomus frondo- comparison with the brain of other crustaceans such as represen- sus Yager, 1989, (Remipedia, Godzilliidae) specimen was em- tatives of the Branchiopoda and Maxillopoda the brain of G. bedded in Unicryl (British Biocell International, Cardiff, U.K.). frondosus is highly organized and well differentiated. It is matched Slices of 2.5 ␮m were sectioned by using a Reichert-Jung in complexity only by the brain of ‘‘higher’’ crustaceans (Malacos- 2050-supercut. After toluidine-blue staining, digital images were traca) and Hexapoda.
    [Show full text]