DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Nature to Understand Nurture Genetic Associations Show How Parenting Matters for Children’S Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using Nature to Understand Nurture Genetic Associations Show How Parenting Matters for Children’S Education INSIGHTS Downloaded from http://science.sciencemag.org/ on February 1, 2018 PERSPECTIVES GENETICS Using nature to understand nurture Genetic associations show how parenting matters for children’s education By Philipp D. Koellinger1 that parents provide for their children)? ited family environments influence chil- and K. Paige Harden2 Answering this enduring question can di- dren’s educational success, a phenomenon rectly inform our efforts to reduce social termed genetic nurture. hildren resemble their parents in inequality and disease burden. On page Specifically, Kong et al. show that the health, wealth, and well-being. Is 424 of this issue, Kong et al. (1) use genetic part of the parental genotype that children parent-child similarity in traits and data from trios of parents and offspring behaviors due to nature (the genes to address this question in an intriguing 1De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands. that children inherit from their par- way. By measuring parents’ and children’s 2108 E. Dean Keeton Stop #A8000, Austin, TX 78704, USA. C ents) or nurture (the environment genes, they provide evidence that inher- Email: [email protected]; [email protected] IMAGES IMAGES/GETTY HERO PHOTO: 386 26 JANUARY 2018 • VOL 359 ISSUE 6374 sciencemag.org SCIENCE Published by AAAS DA_0126Perspectives.indd 386 1/24/18 10:59 AM Genetic nurture considers the influence other compelling example of how tightly Yet, genetic nurture does not undermine of family environment on offspring. genetic and environmental mechanisms the value of genetic associations for pre- are entangled. diction purposes. For example, researchers do not inherit can nonetheless predict Genetic nurture also raises important who want to control for genetic effects in children’s educational attainment. This methodological issues for future stud- order to obtain more precise estimates of genetic nurture effect is an indirect link ies. Geneticists have long been concerned an environmental or medical treatment in between parental genotypes and children’s with population stratification (9), which a randomized controlled trial (12) do not characteristics, not caused by the chil- is defined as the existence of systematic care why the genes are correlated with the dren’s own biology but rather by the family differences in gene frequency between outcome. All that matters is that the genes environment that covaries with parental groups that might also differ in environ- used as control variables predict as much genes. The concept of genetic nurture in ment and culture. Population stratification variance as possible in the target outcome. human families extends previous work by can induce a genotype-phenotype correla- Furthermore, for many scientists nur- behavioral ecologists and animal breeders tion that is, in fact, due to an unidentified ture, not nature, is the phenomenon of in- on indirect genetic effects: environmen- group environment. The classic example terest. The study from Kong et al. provides tally mediated effects of one organism’s is the chopsticks gene (10): Any genetic these scientists with a fascinating new tool genes on the phenotype of a related organ- variant that differs in frequency between for investigating the effects of the family ism (2). For instance, one source of genetic Asians and Europeans would come to be environment. Until now, the primary tools variation in dung beetle body size is how correlated with using chopsticks if popu- to disentangle the effects of a parent’s genes large a brood mass the mother beetle pro- lation stratification were uncontrolled. from their actual parenting were adoption duces (3). Interestingly, given how much of Controlling for population stratification is studies (13) and children-of-twins studies Downloaded from the animal research on indirect genetic ef- typically accomplished by using statistical (14). However, collecting such data is dif- fects has centered on offspring body ficult, and these study designs rarely size, Kong et al. found no evidence of represent the entire range of environ- genetic nurture on children’s height ments. Kong et al. capitalize on the and body mass index (BMI). For hu- “...genetic nurture provides another same logic as an adoption study. The mans living in wealthy societies, ge- nontransmitted parental alleles func- compelling example of how http://science.sciencemag.org/ netic nurture might be more relevant tion like the genotype of an adoptive for behavior and social achievements tightly genetic and environmental parent, in that they help to shape the than for more biologically proximal mechanisms are entangled.” rearing environment but are indepen- outcomes such as body size. dent from the offspring’s genotype. Although the analyses of Kong et al. Data sets with genotyped trios and focus on a single child within a nuclear fam- techniques that adjust for ancestry-specific high-quality measurements of the family ily, they are careful to remind us that family genetic differences among people. How- environment are, unfortunately, still rare. is more than one generation deep and often ever, there is no clear line between popu- But because of low genotyping costs, the includes more than one child per generation. lation stratification and genetic nurture, trio design developed by Kong et al. could The environment that parents provide for particularly once we realize that genetic become a valuable and cost-effective re- their children could reflect the long arm of nurture effects might themselves repro- search paradigm for scientists interested on February 1, 2018 nurture by previous ancestors. And, siblings duce across generations: At what point in understanding the impact of family en- might create environments for each other. does family history become ancestry? vironments on human flourishing. Genetic nurture could operate through any For researchers whose aim is to identify The ingenious analysis of genetic trio physical or social environment woven by ge- only those genetic effects that could be data by Kong et al. reminds us yet again of netic kin—a tangled web indeed. causally manipulated by changing an indi- the methodological problems that plague The phenomenon of genetic nurture vidual’s own genotype, genetic nurture is, scientists as we try to understand individ- underscores that the results of genetic as- like population stratification, a source of ual differences in complex human behav- sociation studies cannot be interpreted as false results. iors and diseases—but also illustrates how support for a biologically determinist ac- Genetic nurture also presents a new chal- understanding nature can provide us with count of human individual differences, lenge for research designs such as Mende- new tools for studying nurture. j as most social scientists who work with lian randomization (11) that aim to identify genetic data have stressed (4, 5). Rather, causal effects by using genes as if they were REFERENCES 1. A. Kong et al., Science 359, 424 (2018). results from genetic association studies naturally occurring experiments. For ex- 2. J. B. Wolf et al., Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 64 (1998). are correlations that might point the way ample, a researcher might use the alleles 3. J. Hunt, L. W. Simmons, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, toward understanding causal mechanisms, associated with educational attainment to 6828 (2002). 4. C. A. Rietveld et al., Science 340, 1467 (2013). but these mechanisms are likely to be test whether going further in school has 5. A. Okbay et al., Nature 533, 539 (2016). complex and phenotype-specific. Genetic a causal effect on one’s health. One of the 6. R. de Vlaming et al., PLOS Genet. 13, e1006495 (2017). associations might depend on environ- assumptions of Mendelian randomization 7. E. M. Tucker-Drob et al., Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22, 349 mental context (6); for example, the al- is that genes are not correlated with unob- (2013). 8. C. Jencks, Am. Sociol. Rev. 45, 723 (1980). leles influencing educational attainment served confounds, such as parental environ- 9. A. L. Price et al., Nat. Genet. 38, 904 (2006). might differ between birth cohorts that ment. The study of Kong et al. clearly shows 10. D. H. Hamer, Mol. Psychiatry 5, 11 (2000). have experienced different social and po- that this assumption can be wrong. If alleles 11. D. A. Lawlor et al., Stat. Med. 27, 1133 (2008). 12. D. J. Benjamin et al., Annu. Rev. Econom. 4, 627 (2012). litical institutions. And genetic effects can identified in genetic association studies are 13. J. M. Horn et al., Behav. Genet. 9, 177 (1979). exert their influence via environmentally not, in fact, independent of the parental en- 14. B. M. D’Onofrio et al., J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied mediated channels, such as how teachers vironment, then Mendelian randomization Discip. 44, 1130 (2003). react to students with specific genotypes studies might detect causal effects that are (7, 8). Now, genetic nurture provides an- not really there. 10.1126/science.aar6429 SCIENCE sciencemag.org 26 JANUARY 2018 • VOL 359 ISSUE 6374 387 Published by AAAS DA_0126Perspectives.indd 387 1/24/18 10:59 AM Using nature to understand nurture Philipp D. Koellinger and K. Paige Harden Science 359 (6374), 386-387. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar6429 Downloaded from ARTICLE TOOLS http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6374/386 RELATED http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/359/6374/424.full http://science.sciencemag.org/ CONTENT REFERENCES This article cites 14 articles, 3 of which you can access for free http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6374/386#BIBL PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions on February 1, 2018 Use of this article is subject to the Terms of Service Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. 2017 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kinship Terminology
    Fox (Mesquakie) Kinship Terminology IVES GODDARD Smithsonian Institution A. Basic Terms (Conventional List) The Fox kinship system has drawn a fair amount of attention in the ethno­ graphic literature (Tax 1937; Michelson 1932, 1938; Callender 1962, 1978; Lounsbury 1964). The terminology that has been discussed consists of the basic terms listed in §A, with a few minor inconsistencies and errors in some cases. Basically these are the terms given by Callender (1962:113-121), who credits the terminology given by Tax (1937:247-254) as phonemicized by CF. Hockett. Callender's terms include, however, silent corrections of Tax from Michelson (1938) or fieldwork, or both. (The abbreviations are those used in Table l.)1 Consanguines Grandparents' Generation (1) nemesoha 'my grandfather' (GrFa) (2) no hkomesa 'my grandmother' (GrMo) Parents' Generation (3) nosa 'my father' (Fa) (4) nekya 'my mother' (Mo [if Ego's female parent]) (5) nesekwisa 'my father's sister' (Pat-Aunt) (6) nes'iseha 'my mother's brother' (Mat-Unc) (7) nekiha 'my mother's sister' (Mo [if not Ego's female parent]) 'Other abbreviations used are: AI = animate intransitive; AI + O = tran- sitivized AI; Ch = child; ex. = example; incl. = inclusive; m = male; obv. = obviative; pi. = plural; prox. = proximate; sg. = singular; TA = transitive ani­ mate; TI-0 = objectless transitive inanimate; voc. = vocative; w = female; Wi = wife. Some citations from unpublished editions of texts by Alfred Kiyana use abbreviations: B = Buffalo; O = Owl (for these, see Goddard 1990a:340). 244 FOX
    [Show full text]
  • Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with At-Risk Families
    ISSUE BRIEF January 2013 Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With At-Risk Families Parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) is a family-centered What’s Inside: treatment approach proven effective for abused and at-risk children ages 2 to 8 and their caregivers—birth parents, • What makes PCIT unique? adoptive parents, or foster or kin caregivers. During PCIT, • Key components therapists coach parents while they interact with their • Effectiveness of PCIT children, teaching caregivers strategies that will promote • Implementation in a child positive behaviors in children who have disruptive or welfare setting externalizing behavior problems. Research has shown that, as a result of PCIT, parents learn more effective parenting • Resources for further information techniques, the behavior problems of children decrease, and the quality of the parent-child relationship improves. Child Welfare Information Gateway Children’s Bureau/ACYF 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW Eighth Floor Washington, DC 20024 800.394.3366 Email: [email protected] Use your smartphone to https:\\www.childwelfare.gov access this issue brief online. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With At-Risk Families https://www.childwelfare.gov This issue brief is intended to build a better of the model, which have been experienced understanding of the characteristics and by families along the child welfare continuum, benefits of PCIT. It was written primarily to such as at-risk families and those with help child welfare caseworkers and other confirmed reports of maltreatment or neglect, professionals who work with at-risk families are described below. make more informed decisions about when to refer parents and caregivers, along with their children, to PCIT programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Children and Stepfamilies: a Snapshot
    Children and Stepfamilies: A Snapshot by Chandler Arnold November, 1998 A Substantial Percentage of Children live in Stepfamilies. · More than half the Americans alive today have been, are now, or eventually will be in one or more stepfamily situations during their lives. One third of all children alive today are expected to become stepchildren before they reach the age of 18. One out of every three Americans is currently a stepparent, stepchild, or stepsibling or some other member of a stepfamily. · Between 1980 and 1990 the number of stepfamilies increased 36%, to 5.3 million. · By the year 2000 more Americans will be living in stepfamilies than in nuclear families. · African-American children are most likely to live in stepfamilies. 32.3% of black children under 18 residing in married-couple families do so with a stepparent, compared with 16.1% of Hispanic origin children and 14.6% of white children. Stepfamily Situations in America Of the custodial parents who have chosen to remarry we know the following: · 86% of stepfamilies are composed of biological mother and stepfather. · The dramatic upsurge of people living in stepfamilies is largely do to America’s increasing divorce rate, which has grown by 70%. As two-thirds of the divorced and widowed choose to remarry the number of stepfamilies is growing proportionately. The other major factor influencing the number of people living in stepfamilies is the fact that a substantial number of children entering stepfamilies are born out of wedlock. A third of children entering stepfamilies do so after birth to an unmarried mother, a situation that is four times more common in black stepfamilies than white stepfamilies.1 Finally, the mode of entry into stepfamilies also varies drastically with the age of children: while a majority of preschoolers entering stepfamilies do so after nonmarital birth, the least frequent mode of entry for these young children (16%) fits the traditional conception of a stepfamily as formed 1 This calculation includes children born to cohabiting (but unmarried) parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Trends Affecting Families in Central America and the Caribbean
    Major Trends Affecting Families in Central America and the Caribbean Prepared by: Dr. Godfrey St. Bernard The University of the West Indies St. Augustine Trinidad and Tobago Phone Contacts: 1-868-776-4768 (mobile) 1-868-640-5584 (home) 1-868-662-2002 ext. 2148 (office) E-mail Contacts: [email protected] [email protected] Prepared for: United Nations Division of Social Policy and Development Department of Economic and Social Affairs Program on the Family Date: May 23, 2003 Introduction Though an elusive concept, the family is a social institution that binds two or more individuals into a primary group to the extent that the members of the group are related to one another on the basis of blood relationships, affinity or some other symbolic network of association. It is an essential pillar upon which all societies are built and with such a character, has transcended time and space. Often times, it has been mooted that the most constant thing in life is change, a phenomenon that is characteristic of the family irrespective of space and time. The dynamic character of family structures, - including members’ status, their associated roles, functions and interpersonal relationships, - has an important impact on a host of other social institutional spheres, prospective economic fortunes, political decision-making and sustainable futures. Assuming that the ultimate goal of all societies is to enhance quality of life, the family constitutes a worthy unit of inquiry. Whether from a social or economic standpoint, the family is critical in stimulating the well being of a people. The family has been and will continue to be subjected to myriad social, economic, cultural, political and environmental forces that shape it.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Analysis of Kinship Terminologies and Its Relationship to What Constitutes Kinship (Complete Text)
    MATHEMATICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURAL THEORY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL VOLUME 1 NO. 1 PAGE 1 OF 46 NOVEMBER 2000 FORMAL ANALYSIS OF KINSHIP TERMINOLOGIES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO WHAT CONSTITUTES KINSHIP (COMPLETE TEXT) 1 DWIGHT W. READ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90035 [email protected] Abstract The goal of this paper is to relate formal analysis of kinship terminologies to a better understanding of who, culturally, are defined as our kin. Part I of the paper begins with a brief discussion as to why neither of the two claims: (1) kinship terminologies primarily have to do with social categories and (2) kinship terminologies are based on classification of genealogically specified relationships traced through genitor and genetrix, is adequate as a basis for a formal analysis of a kinship terminology. The social category argument is insufficient as it does not account for the logic uncovered through the formalism of rewrite rule analysis regarding the distribution of kin types over kin terms when kin terms are mapped onto a genealogical grid. Any formal account must be able to account at least for the results obtained through rewrite rule analysis. Though rewrite rule analysis has made the logic of kinship terminologies more evident, the second claim must also be rejected for both theoretical and empirical reasons. Empirically, ethnographic evidence does not provide a consistent view of how genitors and genetrixes should be defined and even the existence of culturally recognized genitors is debatable for some groups. In addition, kinship relations for many groups are reckoned through a kind of kin term calculus independent of genealogical connections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Edited by Caroline Sweetman
    Women • and the Family Edited by Caroline Sweetman Oxfam Focus on Gender The books in Oxfam's Focus on Gender series were originally published as single issues of the journal Gender and Development (formerly Focus on Gender). Gender and Development is published by Oxfam three times a year. It is the only British journal to focus specifically on gender and development issues internationally, to explore the links between gender and development initiatives, and to make the links between theoretical and practical work in this field. For information about subscription rates, please apply to Carfax Publishing Company, PO Box 25, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3UE, UK; Fax: +44 (0) 1235 553559. In North America, please apply to Carfax Publishing Company, 875-81 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139; Fax: (+1) 617 354 6875. In Australia, please apply to Carfax Publishing Company, Locked Bag 25, Deakin, ACT 2600, Australia; Fax: +61 (0) 6282 3299. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of the Publisher. Front cover: Off to school at Kwa Ngema, Eastern Transvaal. GILL DE VLIEG, AFRAPIX © Oxfam (UK and Ireland) 1996 Published by Oxfam (UK and Ireland), 274 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DZ, UK. Designed and typeset by Oxfam Design Department OX 808/MCA/96 Oxfam is a registered charity No. 202918 Oxfam (UK and Ireland) is a member of Oxfam International ISBN 0 85598 352 3 This book converted to digital file in 2010 Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Part 6: the Single- Parent Family
    PParartt 6:6: TThhee SSiinnglglee-- PParareenntt FFamamiilly:y: AA CChhaalllleennggee ffoorr CChhiillddrreenn FFacaciilliitatortator’s’s GGuuiiddee © 1997 Active Parenting Publishers. The publisher grants user the right to duplicate this document only for use with the accompanying Successful Parenting video. Hi! As a teacher and school counselor for 20 years, I worked with children, their teachers, and their parents or guardians. I'm convinced that children want to succeed and that parents and guardians do try to do a good job of raising their children. I believe that parenting is the toughest job there is, and yet, it is the one for which we get very little training. I want to change that. Successful Parenting has been produced to accomplish that goal. "The Single Parent Family: A Challenge for Children " and its companion video, "The Single Parent Family: A Challenge for Parents" are part of the Successful Parenting series. Each comes with a facilitator's guide. Also in the series is my "Heart of Parenting" package, consisting of "Self-Esteem is the Key," "Communication is Crucial," and "Discipline Makes the Difference," each of which comes with a facilitator's guide and a user's guide. There is also a workbook for parents on those three subjects. It parallels the videos and is written at a third to fourth grade reading level. This "Heart of Parenting" package is also available for Spanish-speaking parents, with the tapes and the user's guides in Spanish and the facilitator's guide in English. Also available are the companion tapes, "School Success Takes Teamwork: The Basics "and "School Success Takes Teamwork: Taming the Homework Monster." I am delighted that you have selected my materials to use in your workshop for children of single parent families.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of the 2010 Civil Code on Trends in Joint Physical Custody in Catalonia
    EFFECTS OF THE 2010 CIVIL CODE ON TRENDS IN JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY IN CATALONIA. A COMPARISON WITH THE Document downloaded from www.cairn-int.info - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 158.109.138.45 09/05/2017 14h03. © I.N.E.D REST OF SPAIN Montserrat Solsona, Jeroen Spijker I.N.E.D | « Population » 2016/2 Vol. 71 | pages 297 - 323 ISSN 0032-4663 ISBN 9782733210666 This document is a translation of: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Montserrat Solsona, Jeroen Spijker, « Influence du Code civil catalan (2010) sur les décisions de garde partagée. Comparaisons entre la Catalogne et le reste de Espagne », Population 2016/2 (Vol. 71), p. 297-323. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Available online at : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_POPU_1602_0313--effects-of-the-2010-civil-code- on.htm -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How to cite this article : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Montserrat Solsona, Jeroen Spijker, « Influence du Code civil catalan (2010) sur les décisions de garde partagée. Comparaisons entre la Catalogne et le reste de Espagne », Population 2016/2 (Vol. 71), p. 297-323. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • The Parent-Child Home Program Did You Know
    The Parent-Child Did you know... Home Program l That you are your child’s first and most important teacher? l That your home is your child’s first classroom? l The Parent-Child Home Program That children learn best 49 Church Street, Ware, MA 01082 through play? 413-967-8127 l That the more you read and speak 800-519-1882 x102 to your child, the better The Parent-Child Home Program is administered by he or she will do in school? the Collaborative for Educational Services and is funded through a grant from the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care. Helping Young The Parent-Child Home Program The Collaborative offers support, information and training for parents, teachers, and childcare providers. Children to Learn (PCHP) helps families in their role as For details, please call the Early Childhood office or visit: their child’s first and most important collaborative.org/early-childhood through Books teachers. Our Home Visitors show and Play you fun ways to help your child learn at home through toys, books, and play. Early Childhood Programs Collaborative for Educational Services 97 Hawley Street, Northampton, MA 01060 413.586.4998 or 800.519.1882 (x102) 413.586.1725 Fax [email protected] Everyone is a learner www.facebook.com/collaborative.earlychildhood For children ages 16 months to 3 years “The children who have been in the How PCHP Parent-Child Home Program stand out from the first day of school.” works... Kindergarten Teacher The Parent-Child Home program improves l Throughout the school year a learning, language What parents trained Home Visitor brings FREE development and educational toys and books for and teachers say your child to keep.
    [Show full text]
  • Custody and Child Symptomatology in High Conflict Divorce: an Analysis of Latent Profiles Characterized by Hostility, Escalating Distress, and Detachment
    Psicothema 2021, Vol. 33, No. 1, 95-102 ISSN 0214 - 9915 CODEN PSOTEG Copyright © 2021 Psicothema doi: 10.7334/psicothema2020.224 www.psicothema.com Custody and Child Symptomatology in High Confl ict Divorce: An Analysis of Latent Profi les Ana Martínez-Pampliega1, Marta Herrero1, Susana Cormenzana1, Susana Corral1, Mireia Sanz2, Laura Merino1, Leire Iriarte1, Iñigo Ochoa de Alda3, Leire Alcañiz1, and Irati Alvarez2 1 University of Deusto, 2 Begoñako Andra Mari Teacher Training University College (BAM), and 3 University of the Basque Country Abstract Resumen Background: There is much controversy about the impact of joint physical Custodia y Sintomatología de los Hijos en Divorcios Altamente custody on child symptomatology in the context of high interparental Confl ictivos: Análisis de Perfi les Latentes. Antecedentes: existe una confl ict. In this study we analyzed child symptomatology with person- gran controversia acerca del impacto de la custodia física compartida centered methodology, identifying differential profi les, considering post- en la sintomatología infantil en contexto de alto confl icto interparental. divorce custody, parental symptomatology, and coparenting variables. We El presente estudio analizó la sintomatología infantil a través de una examined the association between these profi les and child symptomatology, metodología centrada en la persona, identifi cando perfi les diferenciales as well as the mediating role of parenting in that association. Method: al considerar las variables custodia postdivorcio, sintomatología parental The participants were 303 divorced or separated Spanish parents with y coparentalidad. Se analizó la asociación entre estos perfi les y la high interparental confl ict. We used the study of latent profi les and the sintomatología infantil, así como el papel mediador de la parentalidad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social History of the American Family: an Encyclopedia
    The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia Single-Parent Families Contributors: Ashton Chapman Edited by: Marilyn J. Coleman & Lawrence H. Ganong Book Title: The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia Chapter Title: "Single-Parent Families" Pub. Date: 2014 Access Date: December 11, 2015 Publishing Company: SAGE Publications, Inc. City: Thousand Oaks Print ISBN: 9781452286167 Online ISBN: 9781452286143 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452286143.n476 Print pages: 1188-1193 ©2014 SAGE Publications, Inc.. All Rights Reserved. This PDF has been generated from SAGE Knowledge. Please note that the pagination of the online version will vary from the pagination of the print book. A single parent, sometimes referred to as a solo parent, serves as a caregiver for children without the assistance of an in-home spouse or partner. Single-parent-family households include at least two people, a parent and a child or children, distinguishing them from single-person households, in which only one person resides. Single-parent families can result from divorce or separation, death, childbirth that occurs either within or outside a romantic relationship, or single-parent adoption. Although single parents may receive support from coparents, family members, friends, or trusted others, this help may be less regular or dependable than help that would be provided by a live-in caregiver. In the absence of a spouse or cohabiting partner, single parents must negotiate child care and other caregiving responsibilities alongside personal work and leisure schedules, a task that requires physical, emotional, and financial capital. Single-parent families have become the fastest-growing family type in North America, thus understanding their histories, strengths, and unique challenges is increasingly important.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Arrangements of Children: 1996
    Living Arrangements of Children 1996 Issued April 2001 Household Economic Studies P70-74 number of children growing up in various What’s in this Report? family situations.1 Current INTRODUCTION AND HIGHLIGHTS Population As in the earlier survey, detailed information Reports LIVING ARRANGEMENTS OF CHILDREN — was obtained on each person’s relationship to AN OVERVIEW every other person in the household, permit- By Jason Fields THE TRADITIONAL NUCLEAR FAMILY ting the identification of many types of rela- tives, and parent-child and sibling relation- CHILDREN LIVING WITH TWO PARENTS: ships. This report describes family situations BIOLOGICAL, STEP-, AND ADOPTIVE beyond the traditional nuclear family of par- CHILDREN LIVING WITH UNMARRIED ents and their children and includes discus- PARENTS sions of extended family households with CHILDREN IN BLENDED FAMILIES relatives and nonrelatives who may contrib- ute substantially to a child’s development ADOPTED CHILDREN and to the household’s economic well-being. CHILDREN WITH SIBLINGS This report also examines the degree to THE EXTENDED FAMILY HOUSEHOLD which children are living in single-parent Relatives in Extended Families families, with stepparents and adoptive par- Multigenerational Households and ents, or with no parents and in the care of Children With Grandparents another relative or guardian. Of special inter- HISTORICAL TRENDS est in this report are new estimates of chil- dren living with unmarried cohabiting par- ents (either with both of their biological INTRODUCTION AND HIGHLIGHTS parents who are not married to each other, or Children live in a variety of family arrange- with a parent and an unmarried partner who ments, some of which are complex, as a is not the child’s biological parent — see defi- consequence of the marriage, divorce, and nitions box for descriptions of these terms).
    [Show full text]