JHE IMPACT of MILITARY BUILD-UP on the ADVISORY FUNCTION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JHE IMPACT of MILITARY BUILD-UP on the ADVISORY FUNCTION U. s. IVrroy MWary Ds 55 i 70 1970 STAFF STUDY JHE IMPACT of MILITARY BUILD-UP on the ADVISORY FUNCTION 300th CIVIL AFFAIRS GROUP Riverdale, Maryland PROPERTY OF US ARMY DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS. 300TH CIVIL AFFAIRS GROUP PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY MEMORIAL USAR CENTER 66Ot BALTIMORE AVENUE. RIVERDALE. MARYLAND 2O84O 5 April 1970 Staff Study nTfc0 Inpwrt of a Eiiitaay Build-up on the Function. " TlffiUt Conaaanaii^f General 352d Civil Aff--ii3?a Area A Aveauo 20340 TOt CoEsaasdiBs Officer United States Ay«sy Combat BavelopEautt AK'Bs CA A^mcy soar GORDON, GEORGIA, 30905 1* iloferences* $ Letfces*, BQ,> UJ5COK&RG, ATCPS-ST.'CA, subject j^In of Civil Affairs C<^ability(U5AR training) $ dated 24 S SQ Pir0t US Ajt?yf AH&REWPU, subject 5 ali^>v0veis£mt of 'Civil Affeirs Ce,pability(USAR TraStiing),*1 date-d 24 Ootolser iS4^8» c* I«ttort Ho. 35^d CA Araa (/,) , AHMMF, HCOKABC Civil ts dcted 4 Doccscsber 2« la rasponoa to the abcvo roferer.ecsj this unit has prepfirei t&j enclosed etaff etudy entitlea !<<?i>,o Impassi of riXitaiy Eui5.d.~ap oa the /-dviaory ?uaa- cn*" Tko study was prepared d«rli^ the 'training year 1969 » in addJ.tioa to otliei? traini»g 3» Tlie staff ctudy conolugion« ead rocoti»endatior!s were dovolojed eftei* es>- tenslvc- reae*<rci> of existins* literat«ro» valuatic-n of sai^or-oias opinions y coived in response to our <jweatio*maire 9 e»d pwsonal Intarviewe with Advisors* 4» *rhie project arjsi^Tsment provided tin interesting &nd ebnlle«si»£f tcslt to r- largcs sogiteont of taiit pcs'senKe-is. \*e hopo th attached clooxmcnt will bo of 0OK vftlus to the Aro\y and x-cccrriaeiad that additicsfel studies DJ? eusvey-t./ps B 'be DKsdo to this unit* furnished* rARC ATTUi A^ UaA f /I'.^Ecil .X csunttdat.t," USA v;u COL. tIBRAHY COLLEGE , PA, OUTLIKE I. Staff Study: The Impact of Military Build-up On the Advisory Function II. Annex A - Historical Development of United States Involvement in Vietnam A, Appendix 1 - Chronology of Events B. Appendix 2 - Pacification ?ro~rams III. Annex B - Analysis of Available Information A. Appendix 1 - Summary of Questionnaire Response B. Appendix 2 - Susimary of Interview Pirdings IV. Annex C - Bibliography V. Annex D - Sample Questionnaire VI. Annex E - Sample of Letter Requesting IniornLacion VII. Annex P - Response to ReqiTests for Information Headquarters 300th CA Group Eiverdale, I'd.. 3 Karch 1970 SUBJECT: The Inpact of ililitary Buildup on the Advisory Function. 1. PROBLEM a. To determine how the civil affairs responsibilities of U. S. Military advisors are affected by the introduction of large numbers of U. S. or Allied forces to conduct military operations. b. Based on findings, to suggest changes in doctrine or organization. 2. ASSUMPTIONS a. The U. S. experience in Vietnam is typical of any future situation involving large numbers of advisors in a country facing insurgency prior to and following the introduc tion of U. S. and Allied conbat forces to conduct military operations, 3. PACTS BEARING ON THE PROBLEM a. U. S. advisors, first assigned to South Vietnam in 1955) grew in number to 21,500 by 1965 v/hen U. S. tactical units were introduced. An advisory network was progressively extended throughout the RVtl political and military establish ment. The primary mission of the advisors evolved from one of assisting South Vietnam by providing planning, training and logistic support to dealing with internal development and paci fication programs. (See AUNEX A -for a more detailed discussion) b. Initially suffering from a variety of ills, pacifi cation program performance became more effective after the U,S. introduced large numbers of troops and other measures were taken to improve security. (See Appendix 2, AN5TEX A) c« After the introduction of U. S. military forces, military advisors and U. S. and Allied troops performed essen tially separate missions often in proximity to each other and reported through different chains of d. The introduction of tactical forces brought the advisor both benefits and problems. (!) Benefits (a) ^ecurlt.^ U. S. Troops provided better pro tection for the advisor, his Vietnamese counterpart, their projects, and to the friendly populace. (b) Assistance_. U, S. Troops provided equipment, material and skilled personnel not previously available for local projects and initiated beneficial civic action projects. (2) Problems ( a ) Conflicts between troop corrimanders and advisors . 1 ) g_oc trinal _ga? . Advisory responsibilities were well defined; however, doctrine did not take into account changes in the advisor's situation caused by the presence of a U, S. tactical unit in .his area. This lack was a basic cause of misunderstanding and conflict between the commander and advisor. 2) Poor Rapport . .Some tactical commanders did not understand the advisor's role. They regarded the advisor as their liaison to Vietnamese officials and expected him to relay th^ir desires to the Vietnamese and insure compliance. Other conffi'-onclers ignored the advisor completely, often to great disad vantage to both. Such rapport as existed was due more to individ ual ability acid initiative than to doctrinal guidelines. 5) Li is trust. U. S. Commanders have been known to withhold operational information from advisors for fear of compromising security. This resulted in incidents 7/hich adversely affected pacification efforts and created bad feelings. 4) Duplication of civic action projects. In many cases tactical troop commanders initiated their own civic action projects without coordinating with the area advisor. Wasteful duplication often resulted. problems . 1 ) Inappropriate behavior of_ troops . The behavior of occidental troops created some animosities, as it did nox conform tc typical Asian behavior. These animosities made it more difficult for the advisor to obtain the cooperation of Vietnamese officials and populace » 2) Inflation and disruption of economic patterns. U. S. troops demanded services and were willing to pay high prices for them. Prices of many items became too high for the average South Vietnamese. Normal earning patterns were changed. Black market activities and corruption increased, 3) Hes^riction of civJlian movement. Restriction of movement of civilians by tactical units imposed hardships on the civilians and obliged the advisor to help set up movement controls and issue travel permits. 4) The increased scale of combat operations after U. S. tactical units were introduced resulted in increased civilian casualties and property destruction. (c) differences in attitude toward the war. ARV¥ and KVJT officials had lived for years with the war and accepted it as a normal condition of life» They felt a prudent attitude towards the war would keep them alive longer and afford them the chance to enjoy a noinial life after 1700 hours. The U. S, tactical commanders felt they had come to Vietnam to win the war after ARVH and the advisors had failed. They were determined to make a contribution to victor;/ during their 12 months tour and establish a creditable record essential to their military careers. Functioning in an American environment and subject to its pres sures, they often had difficulty in appreciating ths attitude of the Vietnamese and the U.. S. advisor whose attitude often tended to parallel that of the Vietnamese. (d) Increased workload and Liaison functjLons. The introduction of U. S. troops and the attendant expansion of the U. S. establishment in Vietnam reduced the time the advisor had available to execute his mission, More visitors were guided on tours, more meetings were attended, and in many cases additional operational requirements had to be satisfied. (A more comprehen sive treatment of this topic may be found in ANKEX B) 4. DISCUSSION •? [Alternative courses of action re J;he Advisor/Troop Commander Relationship» The absence of doctrine defining the advisor/cororaander relationship, and instances of conflict and lack of coordination bet-yaen the two in Vietnam, point to a need for clearer delineation of this relationship. Three possible courses of action nay be considered: (1) Give the advisor authority to veto tactical operations which he considers detrimental to Civil Affairs objectives. This authority might permit; him to countermand tactical operations undertaken in his immediate area subject of course to approval by higher headquarters. It appears that any advantage gained by this course of action nay be outweighed by the adverse effects of such a procedure. For exsnple, confusion may be introduced into operations, planning and staff procedures in tactical operations may be disrupted, and the essential principle of unity of command may be compromised. » (2) Increase the authority of the U. S. tactical commander over the advisor. This may take the form of the advisor being responsive to the wishes of the coriander in combined U. S. - AR71T operations, or of bringing the advisor into a quasi-staff relation ship to the U. S. commander, making him, in effect, the commander's S-5. ^hs record indicates that many commanders attempt to bring the local advisor under their control and perceive advantages in such a relationship. Formalizing this practice would permit com manders to use advisors for the transmission of what amounts to orders to commanders of ARVN units, thereby compromising the AEVTT chain of command. It may also place advisors under the control of officers who do not understand the primary dxities of advisors. These same officers may each lack a proper appreciation of politi cal factors and of Vietnamese methods and operations. Finally, advisory and S-5 functions are essentially separate. Any effort to combine then would compromise the effective performance of each function. (3) Improve coordination between the advisor and the com mander and establish a formal relationship between the two short of a command relationship. This -night take the form of bringing the advisor into the planning phases of tactical operations to be undertaken in his area.
Recommended publications
  • 1. Quincy Wright, a Study of War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964, First Published 1942) Pp
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Quincy Wright, A Study of War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964, first published 1942) pp. 65-7. 2. Raymond Aron, Peace and War (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966) p. 244. 3. Aron, p. 24. 4. Aron, p. 243. 2 Resources and Strategy to 1914 1. See Martin van Creveld, 'The Origins and Development of Mobiliza­ tion Warfare' in Gordon H. McCormick and Richard E. Bissell (eds) Strategic Dimensions of Economic Behavior (New York: Praeger, 1984) pp. 26-43. 2. Arnold Toynbee, Mankind and Mother Earth (Oxford: Oxford Uni­ versity Press, 1976) p. 88. 3. Geoffrey Kemp and John Maurer, 'The Logistics of Pax Britannica' in Uri Ra'anan et al. (eds) Projection of Power: Perspectives, Perceptions and Problems (Hamden: Archon, 1982) p. 30. 4. See Geoffrey Parker, The Army of Flanders and the Spanish Road 1567-1659 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972). 5. Raymond Aron, Peace and War (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966) pp. 244-5. 6. John Evelyn, Navigation and Commerce (1674). Quoted in Aron, p.245. 7. Gordon H. McCormick 'Strategic Considerations in the Development of Economic Thought' in McCormick and Bissell, p. 4. 8. McCormick, p. 5. See Eli F. Heckscher, Mercantilism (London: Allen & Unwin, 1955); 'Revisions in Economic History, V, Mercantilism', The Economic History Review, vol. vii, 1936; and Jacob Viner, 'Policy versus Plenty as Objectives of Foreign Policy in the 17th and 18th Centuries', World Politics, vol. i (1948-49). 9. Heckscher, Mercantilism, vol. ii, p. 43. 10. See John H. Maurer, 'Economics, Strategy and War in Historical Perspective', in McCormick and Bissell, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • TNSR Journal Vol 2 Issue 4 Book Final.Pdf (12.61Mb)
    Texas National Security Review Texas T E R R A I TERRA INCOGNITA N C O G N I T A Volume 2 Issue 4 Volume Print: ISSN 2576-1021 Online: ISSN 2576-1153 MASTHEAD TABLE OF CONTENTS Staff: The Foundation Publisher: Executive Editor: Associate Editors: 04 Wars with Words? Ryan Evans Doyle Hodges, PhD Galen Jackson, PhD Francis J. Gavin Van Jackson, PhD Editor-in-Chief: Managing Editor: Stephen Tankel, PhD William Inboden, PhD Megan G. Oprea, PhD The Scholar Editorial Board: 10 More Significance than Value: Explaining Developments in the Sino-Japanese Contest Over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Chair, Editorial Board: Editor-in-Chief: Todd Hall Francis J. Gavin, PhD William Inboden, PhD 38 The Collapse Narrative: The United States, Mohammed Mossadegh, and the Coup Decision of 1953 Gregory Brew Robert J. Art, PhD Kelly M. Greenhill, PhD John Owen, PhD Richard Betts, PhD Beatrice Heuser, PhD Patrick Porter, PhD 60 The City Is Neutral: On Urban Warfare in the 21st Century John Bew, PhD Michael C. Horowitz, PhD Thomas Rid, PhD David Betz and Hugo Stanford-Tuck Nigel Biggar, PhD Richard H. Immerman, PhD Joshua Rovner, PhD Philip Bobbitt, JD, PhD Robert Jervis, PhD Brent E. Sasley, PhD Hal Brands, PhD Colin Kahl, PhD Elizabeth N. Saunders, PhD Joshua W. Busby, PhD Jonathan Kirshner, PhD Kori Schake, PhD The Strategist Robert Chesney, JD James Kraska, SJD Michael N. Schmitt, DLitt Eliot Cohen, PhD Stephen D. Krasner, PhD Jacob N. Shapiro, PhD 90 Thinking in Space: The Role of Geography in National Security Decision-Making Audrey Kurth Cronin, PhD Sarah Kreps, PhD Sandesh Sivakumaran, PhD Andrew Rhodes Theo Farrell, PhD Melvyn P.
    [Show full text]
  • Why NATO Endures
    This page intentionally left blank Why NATO Endures Why NATO Endures develops two themes as it examines military alli- ances and their role in international relations. The first is that the Atlantic Alliance, also known as NATO, has become something very different from virtually all pre-1939 alliances and many contemporary alliances. The members of early alliances frequently feared their allies as much if not more than their enemies, viewing them as temporary accomplices and future rivals. In contrast, NATO members are almost all democracies that encourage each other to grow stronger. The book’s second theme is that NATO, as an alliance of democracies, has developed hidden strengths that have allowed it to endure for roughly sixty years, unlike most other alliances, which often broke apart within a few years. Democracies can and do disagree with one another, but they do not fear one another. They also need the approval of other democracies as they conduct their foreign policies. These traits constitute built-in, self-healing tendencies, which is why NATO endures. Wallace J. Thies, a Yale Ph.D., has held full-time teaching positions in political science at the University of Connecticut (Storrs), the University of California, Berkeley, and the Catholic University of America. Why NATO Endures is his third book. His two previous books are When Governments Collide: Coercion and Diplomacy in the Vietnam Conflict (1980) and Friendly Rivals: Bargaining and Burden-Shifting in NATO (2003). He has also published articles in the Journal of Conflict Resolution, Journal of Strategic Studies, International Interactions, Comparative Strategy, and European Security and has served as an International Affairs Fellow of the Council on Foreign Relations, working at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense : Robert S. Mcnamara
    The Ascendancy of the Secretary ofJULY Defense 2013 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara 1961-1963 Special Study 4 Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 4 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara 1961-1963 Cover Photo: Secretary Robert S. McNamara, Gen. Maxwell D. Taylor, and President John F. Kennedy at the White House, January 1963 Source: Robert Knudson/John F. Kennedy Library, used with permission. Cover Design: OSD Graphics, Pentagon. Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 4 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara 1961-1963 Special Study 4 Series Editors Erin R. Mahan, Ph.D. Chief Historian, Office of the Secretary of Defense Jeffrey A. Larsen, Ph.D. President, Larsen Consulting Group Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense July 2013 ii iii Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 4 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Contents This study was reviewed for declassification by the appropriate U.S. Government departments and agencies and cleared for release. The study is an official publication of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Foreword..........................................vii but inasmuch as the text has not been considered by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, it must be construed as descriptive only and does Executive Summary...................................ix not constitute the official position of OSD on any subject. Restructuring the National Security Council ................2 Portions of this work may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line in included.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Policy in the Great Society, Part Two
    Joint Center for Housing Studies Harvard University Into the Wild Blue Yonder: The Urban Crisis, Rocket Science, and the Pursuit of Transformation Housing Policy in the Great Society, Part Two Alexander von Hoffman March 2011 W11-3 The research for this working paper was conducted with the support of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, The Ford Foundation, and the Fannie Mae Foundation. © by Alexander von Hoffman. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Off we go into the wild blue yonder, Climbing high into the sun Introduction Of the several large and important domestic housing and urban programs produced by Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society administration, the best-known is Model Cities. Although it lasted only from 1966 to 1974, its advocates believed Model Cities had promised a better tomorrow for America’s cities and bitterly lamented its termination—blaming Richard Nixon’s policies, diversion of funds for the Vietnam war, and the nation’s lack of commitment to social progress. Yet the legislation that created Model Cities was ambitious, contradictory, and vague. As such, it vividly expressed the idealistic impulses, currents of thought, and reactions to events that converged, however incoherently, in national urban policy of the 1960s. At the center of the fervor for domestic policy was the president of the United States, Lyndon Johnson, who hungered for dramatic new programs that would transform the country the way New Deal policies had reshaped America in his youth.
    [Show full text]
  • WOOOROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER for SCHOLARS Smif H-Iut~Iminstitti F ;On Building Washington D.C
    WOOOROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Smif h-iut~imInstitti f ;on Building Washington D.C. WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Director, James H. Billington Deputy Director, George R. Packard Created by Act of Congress in 1968 as an institute for advanced study and as a "livin memorial ' to the 28th President, the Wilson Center supports serious scholarship and its interaction with the world of affairs. The Center-and The Wilson Quarterly-seek diversity of scholarly enterprise and of points of view. THE WILSON QUARTERLY Editor: Peter Braestrup Associate Editor (Essays): Philip S. Cook Associate Editor (Periodicals): Cullen Murohv Associate Editor (Books): ~oisDecker 0'~;ifl Associate Editor (Production): Anna Marie Torres Assistant Editors: Fred Howard, Stuart Rohrer Contributing Editors: Beryl Lieff Benderly, John Brown, Malcolm B. DeBevoise, Michael J. Glennon, Steven A. Grant, John E. Kocjan, Peter Kovler, Andrea MacLeod, Gustav Magrinat, Raphael Sagalyn, Dody Wilson Smith Administrative Assistant: Melanie Davis Editorial Secretary: Rita B. Miller Production Assistant: Lucy S. Gregg Research Associates: Mark Foley, David M. Friedman, Bruce Jenks, Craig Lingel, Kathleen O'Pella, Jane Spivak Librarian: Zdenek David Art Director: Elizabeth Dixon Business Manager: William M. Dunn Circulation Coordinator: Michael W. Frenkel Editorial Advisers: Prosser Gifford, Abraham Lowenthal, Richard Seamon, S. Frederick Starr, Samuel F. Wells, Jr. Published in January, April, July, and'October by the Woodrow Wilson Interna- tional Center for Scholars, Smithsonian Institution Building, Washington, D.C. 20560. Copyright 0 1978 by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. THE WILSON QUARTERLY is a registered trademark. Subscriptions: one year, 572; two years, S2I; three years, $30.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Our Past How a Vietnam-Era Pacification Program Can Help Us Win in Afghanistan
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis and Dissertation Collection 2009-09 Learning from our past how a Vietnam-era pacification program can help us win in Afghanistan Bumgarner, Amy S. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/4662 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS LEARNING FROM OUR PAST: HOW A VIETNAM-ERA PACIFICATION PROGRAM CAN HELP US WIN IN AFGHANISTAN by Amy S. Bumgarner September 2009 Thesis Co-Advisors: Thomas H. Johnson Sophal Ear Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2009 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Learning from our Past: How a Vietnam-era 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Pacification Program Can Help us Win in Afghanistan 6. AUTHOR(S) Amy S. Bumgarner 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 a Dissertation Presented
    The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Robert Thomas Davis II August 2008 © 2008 Robert Thomas Davis II All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 by ROBERT THOMAS DAVIS II has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by ______________________________ Peter John Brobst Associate Professor of History ______________________________ Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii Abstract DAVIS, ROBERT THOMAS II, Ph.D., August 2008, History The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 (422 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Peter John Brobst This study is a reappraisal of the strategic dilemma of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Cold War. This dilemma revolves around the problem of articulating a strategic concept for a military alliance in the nuclear era. NATO was born of a perceived need to defend Western Europe from a Soviet onslaught. It was an imperative of the early alliance to develop a military strategy and force posture to defend Western Europe should such a war break out. It was not long after the first iteration of strategy took shape than the imperative for a military defense of Europe receded under the looming threat of thermonuclear war. The advent of thermonuclear arsenals in both the United States and Soviet Union brought with it the potential destruction of civilization should war break out. This realization made statesmen on both sides of the Iron Curtain undergo what has been referred to as an ongoing process of nuclear learning.
    [Show full text]
  • I Will the CORDS Snap?
    Will the CORDS Snap? Testing the Widely Accepted Assumption that Inter-Agency Single Management Improves Policy-Implementation by Patrick Vincent Howell Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter Feaver, Chair ___________________________ David Rohde ___________________________ Kyle Beardsley, Supervisor ___________________________ Henry Brands Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 i v ABSTRACT Will the CORDS Snap? Testing the Widely Accepted Assumption that Inter-Agency Single Management Improves Policy-Implementation Title by Patrick Vincent Howell Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter Feaver, Chair ___________________________ David Rohde ___________________________ Kyle Beardsley, Supervisor ___________________________ Henry Brands An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 Copyright by Patrick Vincent Howell 2018 Abstract Since the end of the Cold War, the US Government’s difficulties in implementing policies requiring integrated responses from multiple agencies have led to a number of calls to reform USG inter-agency policy-implementation; similar to how the 1986
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation Und Monarchische Prärogative: Der Niedergang Des Amerikanischen Reformismus, 1962-1963
    V. Transformation und monarchische Prärogative: Der Niedergang des amerikanischen Reformismus, 1962-1963 V. 1. Das Scheitern des «Amini-Experiments» und die Re-Etablierung der Schah- Autokratie Noch im Oktober 1961 konnte man den Eindruck gewinnen, dass die amerikanische Entschlossenheit, das „Amini-Experiment“ in Iran zu einem erfolgreichen Ende zu führen, ungebrochen ist. Im Anschluss an die anglo-amerikanische Intervention zugunsten der Reformregierung schien tatsächlich ein neues, einigen Optimismus rechtfertigendes Verhältnis zwischen Ministerpräsident Amini und Mohammad Rezā entstanden zu sein.1 Chester Bowles stattete in seiner neuen Rolle als Sonderbeauftragter des Präsidenten für die Dritte Welt im Februar 1962 Teheran einen Besuch ab, der in erster Linie das fortgesetzte Interesse der Administration an Iran dokumentieren sollte. Bowles schätzte im Anschluss die Situation als „kontrollierbar“ ein.2 Tatsächlich war diese Stabilität nur von kurzer Dauer. Im März berichtete die Botschaft erneut von einer niedergeschlagenen Stimmungslage des Monarchen, der sich bitter über die Undankbarkeit und Vernachlässigung seitens der USA beschwerte. Angesichts des fehlenden Verständnisses für seine exponierte und gefährdete Position als Folge seiner pro-westlichen Haltung und der ausbleibenden Zusagen über größere Militärhilfe sei er womöglich gezwungen, als Oberkommandierender der Streitkräfte abzudanken.3 Bezeichnend für die sich wandelnde Stimmungslage in Washington war, dass diesen im Grunde altbekannten Drohungen nun erhöhte Aufmerksamkeit zuteil wurde. Auf Vorschlag des State Department wurde der Besuch des Schahs daher auf den April vorverlegt mit der Begründung, dass nur so eine Abdankung verhindert werden könne, die zwangsläufig in politischem Chaos resultieren würde.4 Wenigstens konnte Bob Komer vorerst vereiteln, dass das geplante MAP-Programm 1 Amini wehrte sich erfolgreich gegen die vom Schah geforderten Kabinettsänderungen, unterstützt vom SAWAK- Direktor Pākrawān.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phoenix Program and Contemporary Counterinsurgency
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, a conference summary, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • JFQ 47 Chinese Sailors Man the Rails As Download As Computer Wallpaper at Ndupress.Ndu.Edu Qingdoa Enters Pearl Harbor
    4 pi J O I N T F O R C E Q uarterly Issue 47, 4th Quarter 2007 New Books from NDU Press Published for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff by National Defense University JFQ Congress At War: coming next in... The Politics of Conflict Since 1789 by Charles A. Stevenson Homeland Defense Reviews the historical record of the U.S. Congress in authorizing, funding, overseeing, and terminating major military operations. Refuting arguments that Congress cannot and should not set limits or conditions on the use of the U.S. Armed Forces, this book catalogs the many times when previous Congresses have enacted restrictions—often with the acceptance and compliance of wartime Presidents. While Congress has formally declared war only 5 U.S. Northern Command times in U.S. history, it has authorized the use of force 15 other times. In recent decades, however, lawmakers have weakened their Constitutional claims by failing on several occasions to enact measures either supporting or opposing military operations ordered by the President. plus Dr. Charles A. Stevenson teaches at the Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins Uni- versity. A former professor at the National War College, he also draws upon his two decades as a Senate staffer Download as computer wallpaper at ndupress.ndu.edu on national security matters to illustrate the political motivations that influence decisions on war and peace Defense Support of Concise, dramatically written, and illustrated with summary tables, this book is a must-read for anyone inter- Civil Authorities ested in America’s wars—past or present.
    [Show full text]