DOCSLIB.ORG

The People Stand up for the MFA» - the Carnation Revolution, 50 Years Later

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The People Stand up for the MFA» - the Carnation Revolution, 50 Years Later H-Portugal «The people stand up for the MFA» - The Carnation Revolution, 50 years later Discussion published by Lisandro Cañón on Wednesday, August 25, 2021 Type: Call for Papers Subject Fields: Contemporary History, Political History / Studies, Social History / Studies, Spanish and Portuguese History / Studies, Women's & Gender History / Studies «The people stand up for the MFA» - The Carnation Revolution, 50 years later Edited by Maria Inácia Rezola e Lisandro Cañón PRESENTATION On April 25, 1974, the Armed Forces Movement (MFA) carried out a coup d'état in Portugal that, in less than 24 hours, overthrew one of the longest dictatorships in Europe (Estado Novo, 1926-1974). In the already abundant literature on the Portuguese revolutionary process there is a relative consensus on the nature of the 25th of April, a coup that popular involvement transforms into a revolution (Ferreira, 1993; Reis, 1994). Likewise, we can find a certain unanimity with regard to the periodization and main characteristics of the different phases of the Revolution. Despite these consensuses regarding the nature of the 25th of April and the essential rhythms of the revolution, many other aspects remain controversial. Studies on the 25th of April have oscillated between two opposing interpretive lines (Rezola, 2020): those who highlight its pioneering spirit, presenting it as a precursor to the third wave of transitions to democracy (Pinto, 2013), and those who stress its “backwardness” by affiliating it in past revolutionary movements (Ferreira, 1993; Martins, 2018). As the 50th anniversary of the Carnation Revolution is approaching, the edited book «The people stand up for the MFA» - The Carnation Revolution, 50 years later aims to bring together studies that present and explain the main dimensions of the Portuguese Revolution of 1974-1975. Intending to adopt an interdisciplinary and transnational register, the coordinators call for proposals of original chapters framed in the following thematic axes/topics (but not limited to them): • Popular movements and initiatives • Social conflicts • Collective production units and agrarian reform Citation: Lisandro Cañón. «The people stand up for the MFA» - The Carnation Revolution, 50 years later. H-Portugal. 08-25-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/11273/discussions/8137481/%C2%AB-people-stand-mfa%C2%BB-carnation-revolution-50-years-later Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Portugal • Parties, institutions and political power • Colonial war and decolonization • Political intervention by the military • Education, aesthetics and culture • International Dimension of the Portuguese Revolution • Legacies and impacts (national and international) of the Portuguese Revolution • Memory practices and policies • Revolutions Historiography We invite all interested researchers to participate in any of these topics. Proposals should be submitted to [email protected] and [email protected] until October 31, 2021 (final deadline for abstract proposals). It is essential that proposals, whose maximum length is 700-word, have a detailed summary of the chapter's scope, as well as the theme and objectives. The selection of proposals (double blind review) will be guided by the purpose of guaranteeing the maximum quality, originality and diversity of the works. Notifications of acceptance will be sent by November 15, 2021. Final articles will be expected by March 28, 2022. Contact Email: [email protected] Citation: Lisandro Cañón. «The people stand up for the MFA» - The Carnation Revolution, 50 years later. H-Portugal. 08-25-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/11273/discussions/8137481/%C2%AB-people-stand-mfa%C2%BB-carnation-revolution-50-years-later Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revolution and Democracy: Sociopolitical Systems in the Context of Modernisation Leonid E
    preview version Revolution and Democracy: Sociopolitical Systems in the Context of Modernisation Leonid E. Grinin and Andrey V. Korotayev Abstract The stability of socio-political systems and the risks of destabi- lisation in the process of political transformation are among the most im- portant issues of social development; the transition to democracy may pose a serious threat to the stability of a respective socio-political system. This article studies the issue of democratisation. It highlights the high economic and social costs of a rapid transition to democracy for countries unpre- pared for it—democracy resulting from revolutions or similar large-scale events. The authors believe that in a number of cases authoritarian regimes turn out to be more effective in economic and social terms than emerging democracies, especially those of a revolutionary type, which are often inca- pable of ensuring social order and may have a swing to authoritarianism. Effective authoritarian regimes can also be a suitable form of transition to an efficient and stable democracy. Using historical and contemporary examples, particularly the recent events in Egypt, the article investigates various correlations between revolutionary events and the possibility of es- tablishing democracy in a society. Keywords: democracy, revolution, extremists, counterrevolution, Isla- mists, authoritarianism, military takeover, economic efficiency, globali- sation, Egypt Introduction It is not surprising that in five years none of the revolutions of the Arab Spring has solved any urgent issues. Unfortunately, this was probably never a possibility. Various studies suggest a link between 110 preview version revolutions and the degree of modernisation of a society.1 Our research reveals that the very processes of modernisation, regardless of the level of consumption and the rate of population growth, is closely and organically linked to the risk of social and political upheaval, which can Leonid E.
    [Show full text]
  • Artigo 1 Para Ophiussa 1
    OPHIUSSA OPHIUSSA Revista do Instituto de Arqueologia da Faculdade de Letras de Lisboa Nº 1, 1996 Direcção: Victor S. Gonçalves ([email protected]) Secretário: Carlos Fabião ([email protected]) Conselho de Redacção: Amilcar Guerra Ana Margarida Arruda Carlos Fabião João Carlos Senna-Martínez João Pedro Ribeiro João Zilhão Capa: Artlandia Endereço para correspondência e intercâmbio: Instituto de Arqueologia. Faculdade de Letras. P-1600-214. LISBOA. PORTUGAL As opiniões expressas não são necessariamente assumidas pelo colectivo que assume a gestão da Revista, sendo da responsabilidade exclusiva dos seus subscritores. Nota da direcção: Devido a circunstâncias de ordem vária, que seria desinteressante enumerar, tão diversas elas são, este número foi preparado para sair em 1995, mas só agora é publicado. Alguns textos foram muito ligeiramente revistos, mas o essencial, incluindo o texto de apresentação, refere-se àquela data, pelo que tem de ser contextualmente entendido. A periodicidade futura de esta publicação será bienal, sendo o próximo número datado de 2002, com textos entregues até Dezembro de 2001. No sentido de datar propostas científicas e de situar opiniões expressas, solicitou- se a todos os autores que indicassem nas suas contribuições a data de entrega dos originais, e, sempre que necessário, após o texto, a data de revisão última. A partir do nº 2, inclusive, as normas de publicação são idênticas às adoptadas pelo Instituto Português de Arqueologia, na sua Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia (http://www.ipa.min-cultura.pt). Dezembro de 2000 ÍNDICE ALGUMAS HISTÓRIAS EXEMPLARES (E OUTRAS MENOS) Victor S. Gonçalves ............................................................................................................................................. 5 A ARQUEOLOGIA PÓS-PROCESSUAL OU O PASSADO PÓS-MODERNO Mariana Diniz ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy As an Effort Rayna Gavrilova, CEE Trust USAID/Bulgaria Closing Ceremony October 10, 2007, Sofia
    Democracy as an Effort Rayna Gavrilova, CEE Trust USAID/Bulgaria Closing Ceremony October 10, 2007, Sofia Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, When I was invited to say a few words at the official closing of the United States Agency for International Development in Bulgaria, the first title that came to my mind was “Democracy as an Effort.” When change began, democracy for us was mostly about revolution – from Portugal’s Carnation Revolution, to Czechoslovakia’s Velvet Revolution, to Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. Eighteen years later, we already realize that democracy is most of all a constant effort made by citizens and institutions. The post- communist countries, including Bulgaria, were lucky not to have been left alone in this process. The international assistance for laying the foundations of liberal democracy and market economy came early and was timely. The United States was among the first countries to get involved. American public organizations such as USAID, non- governmental organizations and an impressive number of individuals made a long-lasting and systematic effort to elucidate and support this social order which, without doubt, remains the choice of the larger part of humanity. USAID left visible traces in Bulgarian social life. Today we hardly remember it, but through their programs a whole variety of previously unknown concepts, such as “rule of law,” “local government initiative,” “transparency”, and “entrepreneurship promotion” entered the Bulgarian vocabulary and practice, and are today the foundation of the state. Some of the terms which had no equivalent in the rigid vocabulary of socialism remain untranslated even today: probation, mediation, microcredit.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Colorful' Revolution of Kyrgyzstan: Democratic Transition
    The ‘Colorful’ Revolution of Kyrgyzstan: Democratic Transition or Global Competition? Yilmaz Bingol* This paper aims to analyze the reasons behind the recent revolution of Kyrgyzstan. I will argue that explaining the revolution through just the rhetoric of “democracy and freedom” needs to be reassessed, as comparing with its geo-cultural environment; Kyrgyzstan had been the most democratic of Central Asian republics. Thus, the paper argues that global competition between US and China-Russia should seriously be taken under consideration as a landmark reason behind the Kyrgyz revolution. The “Rose Revolution” in Georgia and the “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine followed by yet another “colorful” revolution in Kyrgyzstan in the March of 2005. A group of opposition who were dissatisfied with the result of the Parliamentary Election taken place on February 27th and March 13th of 2005 upraised against incumbent regime of Askar Akayev. Accusing the incumbent regime with the felony and asking for more democracy and freedom, the opposition took over Akayev from the power and closed the last stage of the colorful revolution of Kyrgyzstan on March 24-25, 2005. Common characteristics of all these colorful revolutionist were that they all used rhetoric of “democracy and freedom,” and that they were all pro-western especially pro-American. It seems that it has become a tradition in the West to call such revolutions with the colorful names. This tradition may trace back to Samuel Huntington’s famous “third wave democracy” which was started with “Carnation Revolution” of Portugal in 1974. As Western politicians and academicians have often used such “colorful” names for post-communist and post-Soviet cases since then, they must have regarded these revolutions as the extension of what Huntington has called the “third wave”.
    [Show full text]
  • Portuguese Emigration Under the Corporatist Regime
    From Closed to Open Doors: Portuguese Emigration under the Corporatist Regime Maria Ioannis B. Baganha University of Coimbra [email protected] Abstract This paper analyses the Portuguese emigration policy under the corporatist regime. It departs from the assumption that sending countries are no more than by bystanders in the migratory process. The paper goes a step further, claiming that in the Portuguese case, not only did the Estado Novo (New State) control the migratory flows that were occurring, but that it used emigration to its own advantage. I tried next to present evidence to show that by the analysis of the individual characteristics of the migrants and of their skills, their exodus couldn’t have harmed the country’s economic growth during the sixties, since the percentage of scientific and technical manpower was, when compared to other European countries, far too scarce to frame an industrial labour force higher than the existing one. The paper concludes that during this period, the most likely hypothesis is that the Portuguese migratory flow was composed of migrants that were redundant to the domestic economy. Keywords: Emigration, Portugal, Estado Novo, New State, Corporatist, Salazar, Migration Policy, Labour, Economy, Economic Growth Introduction The political sanctioning of immigration may foster open-door policies in order to maximise the country’s labour supply, it may induce the adoption of quota systems in order to help preserve cultural and political integrity, or it may even promote the incorporation of special skills and intellectual capital. In turn, the political sanctioning of emigration may lead to the selection, promotion, or restriction of emigrants’ departures, which can and usually does distort the composition of the migratory flow, directly affecting the level of remittances that emigration produces and thus its impact on the sending country’s economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Independence, Intervention, and Internationalism Angola and the International System, 1974–1975
    Independence, Intervention, and Internationalism Angola and the International System, 1974–1975 ✣ Candace Sobers Mention the Cold War and thoughts instinctively turn to Moscow, Washing- ton, DC, and Beijing. Fewer scholars examine the significant Cold War strug- gles that took place in the African cities of Luanda, Kinshasa, and Pretoria. Yet in 1975 a protracted war of national liberation on the African continent escalated sharply into a major international crisis. Swept up in the momen- tum of the Cold War, the fate of the former Portuguese colony of Angola captured the attention of policymakers from the United States to Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), Colombia to Luxembourg. The struggle over Angolan independence from Portugal was many things: the culmination of sixteen years of intense anti-colonial struggle and the launch of 28 years of civil war, a threat to white minority rule in southern Africa, and another battle on the long road to ending empire and colonialism. It was also a strug- gle to define and create a viable postcolonial state and to carry out a radical transformation of the sociopolitical structure of Angolan society. Recent scholarship on Angolan independence has provided an impres- sive chronology of the complicated saga yet has less to say about the wider consequences and ramifications of a crisis that, though located in southern Africa, was international in scope. During the anti-colonial struggle, U.S. sup- port reinforced the Portuguese metropole, contiguous African states harbored competing revolutionaries, and great and medium powers—including Cuba, China, and South Africa—provided weapons, combat troops, and mercenar- ies to the three main national liberation movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Portugal's History Since 1974
    Portugal’s history since 1974 Stewart Lloyd-Jones ISCTE-Lisbon AN IMPERIAL LEGACY The Carnation Revolution (Revolução dos Cravos) that broke out on the morning of 25 April 1974 has had a profound effect on Portuguese society, one that still has its echoes today, almost 30 years later, and which colours many of the political decision that have been, and which continue to be made. During the authoritarian regime of António de Oliveira Salazar (1932-68) and his successor, Marcello Caetano (1968-74), Portugal had existed in a world of its own construction. Its vast African empire (Angola, Mozambique, Guinea-Bissau, São Tomé e Príncipe, and Cape Verde) was consistently used to define Portugal’s self-perceived identity as being ‘in, but not of Europe’. Within Lisbon’s corridors of power, the dissolution of the other European empires was viewed with horror, and despite international opprobrium and increasing isolation, the Portuguese dictatorship was in no way prepared to follow the path of decolonisation. As Salazar was to defiantly declare, Portugal would stand ‘proudly alone’, indeed, for a regime that had consciously legitimated itself by ‘turning its back on Europe’, there could be no alternative course of action. Throughout the 1960s and early-1970s, the Portuguese people were to pay a high price for the regime’s determination to remain in Africa. From 1961 onwards, while the world’s attention was focused on events in south-east Asia, Portugal was fighting its own wars. By the end of the decade, the Portuguese government was spending almost half of its GNP on sustaining a military presence of over 150,000 troops in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83720-0 - The Cambridge History of the Cold War: Crises and Détente: Volume II Edited by Melvyn P. Leffler and Odd Arne Westad Index More information Index Cumulative index for Volumes I, II, and III. Bold page numbers refer to maps and photographs. 9/11 attacks, III.134, 537, 550, 554–5 anti-Sovietism, I.150 Berlin crisis, II.168 abortion, III.468, 469, 473 Cuban missile crisis, II.73 Abstract Expressionism, II.30 division of Germany and, II.482–3 Accornero, Aris (Italian social scientist), I.54 European integration, II.182, 183–4 Achaeans, II.1 French relations, II.168, 169, 184 Acheson, Dean, I.78 German unification and, II.203 Acheson–Lilienthal Report, II.397 Khrushchev and, I.319 Excomm, II.71 loss of power, II.483 on Germany, II.119, III.156 Marshall Plan, I.170 grand strategy, I.84–6 NPT and, II.408 Ho Chi Minh and, I.82–3 nuclear weapons, II.487 Japanese policy, I.82, III.156 US relations, II.484 Korean War, I.276 values, II.462–3 Marshall Plan and, I.155, 159 Advanced Research Projects Agency, see NATO, I.81 ARPA Pacific policy, I.274 advertising, III.503, 504–5 political influence, I.83 Adzhubei, Aleksei (Soviet journalist), III.402 postwar assessment, I.74 affluent society, II.510–13, 518 on racial segregation, I.433–4, III.456 Afghanistan Schuman Plan and, II.182 Al Qaeda, III.133–4 Ackermann, Anton (German Communist), bibliography, III.566 I.180 Cold War and, I.484 Acton, John (British historian) I.1, 2 Egyptian relations, III.126 Adamec, Ladislav (Czechoslovak prime fundamentalism, III.536–7
    [Show full text]
  • 25 April 1974: an End Or a Beginning
    Stewart LLOYD-JONES, Lusotopie 2002/2 : 141-147 An End or a Beginning for Portugal ? Some Notes on the Legacy of 25 April 1974* complete generation of Portuguese have passed into adulthood since the heady days of the 1974 Carnation Revolution. For this new Ageneration of Portuguese, globalisation, European integration, and the information revolution are much more significant to their lives than corporatism, colonial wars and the Carnation Revolution can ever be. The chasm that exists between the present generation’s real life experiences and the experiences of their parents and grandparents could not be wider. In all, the 1960s and 1970s are as remote to them as the 1930s and 1940s are to everyone. We can all recognise that the present is shaped by the past, but, with the passage of time, it is much more difficult to assert that events that occurred thirty years ago have a greater influence than those that occurred five or even ten years ago. We are now standing at a moment in time in which it is possible to shed much of the ideological and reverential baggage of the past. While we may acknowledge the actions and sacrifices of older generations, we should no longer be obliged to bow to them. Perhaps it is now time for a few pedestals to be swept away, and for a much more sober assessment of the recent past to be made without seeking approval from those who participated in the events that made the history. With the passage of time and with the release of new archival material, the significance of the participants’ (often unreliable) memoires is reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Bad Times
    asef bayat REVOLUTION IN BAD TIMES ack in 2011, the Arab uprisings were celebrated as world- changing events that would re-define the spirit of our political times. The astonishing spread of these mass uprisings, fol- lowed soon after by the Occupy protests, left observers in Blittle doubt that they were witnessing an unprecedented phenomenon— ‘something totally new’, ‘open-ended’, a ‘movement without a name’; revolutions that heralded a novel path to emancipation. According to Alain Badiou, Tahrir Square and all the activities which took place there—fighting, barricading, camping, debating, cooking and caring for the wounded—constituted the ‘communism of movement’; posited as an alternative to the conventional liberal-democratic or authoritar- ian state, this was a universal concept that heralded a new way of doing politics—a true revolution. For Slavoj Žižek, only these ‘totally new’ political happenings, without hegemonic organizations, charismatic leaderships or party apparatuses, could create what he called the ‘magic of Tahrir’. For Hardt and Negri, the Arab Spring, Europe’s indignado protests and Occupy Wall Street expressed the longing of the multitude for a ‘real democracy’, a different kind of polity that might supplant the hopeless liberal variety worn threadbare by corporate capitalism. These movements, in sum, represented the ‘new global revolutions’.1 ‘New’, certainly; but what does this ‘newness’ tell us about the nature of these political upheavals? What value does it attribute to them? In fact, just as these confident appraisals were being circulated in the us and Europe, the Arab protagonists themselves were anguishing about the fate of their ‘revolutions’, lamenting the dangers of conservative restora- tion or hijacking by free-riders.
    [Show full text]
  • Portugal, O Estado Novo, António De Oliveira Salazar
    PORTUGAL, O ESTADO NOVO, ANTÓNIO DE OLIVEIRA SALAZAR E A ONU: POSICIONAMENTO(S) E (I)LEGALIDADES NO PÓS II GUERRA MUNDIAL (1945-1970) Ana Campina e Sérgio Tenreiro Tomás Resumo: A análise do discurso e da retórica de António de Oliveira Salazar, e do Estado Novo, as Relações Internacionais e Diplomáticas portuguesas são reveladoras da disparidade entre a imagem criada pelo discurso e pela realidade. Portugal, pelo seu posicionamento geopolítico, desempenhou um importante papel durante a II Guerra Mundial pela Neutralidade Colaborante, com os Aliados e com Hitler. As Relações Internacionais com a ONU, como com outras Organizações, foram diplomáticas mas complexas pelo Império Colonial. Salazar não contestou nem se sentiu obrigado a implementar as medidas solicitadas. Com a Guerra Colonial Portugal recebeu diversas “chamadas de atenção”, em particular pela ONU, que ignorou e em nada mudando a luta armada, com resultados catastróficos para todos e com a morte de milhares de militares, assim como com consequências físicas e psicológicas para os sobreviventes. Indubitavelmente Salazar gerou uma imagem díspar da realidade na qual se violavam os Direitos Fundamentais e Humanos. Palavras-Chave: Salazar, Estado Novo, Discurso, ONU Title: Portugal, Estado Novo, António de Oliveira Salazar and the UN: Position(s) and (i)legalities in the post World War II (1945-1970) Abstract: The analysis of António de Oliveira Salazar and the Estado Novo speech and rhetoric, the Portuguese International Relations and the Diplomacy are clear concerning the “distance” between the image created by th e speech and the reality. Portugal, by his geopolitical position, had an important role during the II World War by the Cooperating Neutrality, with the Allies and with Hitler.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Into the Sand? the EU's Faltering Response to the Arab
    December 2013 Running into the sand? The EU’s faltering response to the Arab revolutions By Edward Burke Running into the sand? The EU’s faltering response to the Arab revolutions By Edward Burke Before the Arab Spring, the EU believed it could promote political reform through economic liberalisation. That approach proved ineffective. Since the Arab Spring, the EU’s response has produced limited results. Its ‘more for more’ principle has not resulted in meaningful democratic change. European funds are stretched, North African agricultural exports remain unwelcome in Europe and security concerns often trump concern for democracy. A pragmatic approach to reform in the southern neighbourhood is needed, so that the EU takes account of the different circumstances in each of the countries. The EU should invest in civil service reform, education, judicial reform, a regional free-trade agreement and building security relations across the region. The EU should also increase its democracy assistance to the region through training and capacity- building. But, if it wants to remain a credible actor, Brussels should only fund democracy promotion in those countries where reforms are happening. 1. Introduction1 In 2011, the EU responded to the political uprisings Two years later, optimism for the region’s future has given that swept across North Africa and the Middle East way to concern and even despair. Most dramatically, with a striking mea culpa. In a speech to the European in July 2013 the Egyptian military overthrew a Parliament, the EU Commissioner for Enlargement and democratically-elected president, Mohammed Morsi. Even Neighbourhood Policy, Štefan Füle, admitted: “Too many in Tunisia, often regarded as the most ‘successful’ transition of us fell prey to the assumption that authoritarian in the region, a draft constitution threatens to severely regimes were a guarantee of stability in the region.
    [Show full text]