Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3739–3747, 2012 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3739/2012/ Hydrology and doi:10.5194/hess-16-3739-2012 Earth System © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Sciences
Hydrology of the Po River: looking for changing patterns in river discharge
A. Montanari Department DICAM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Correspondence to: A. Montanari ([email protected])
Received: 13 May 2012 – Published in Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 30 May 2012 Revised: 1 September 2012 – Accepted: 1 October 2012 – Published: 22 October 2012
Abstract. Scientists and public administrators are devoting largest average and largest maximum daily river flow, which increasing attention to the Po River, in Italy, in view of con- are 275 m3 s−1, 1470 m3 s−1 and 10 300 m3 s−1, respectively. cerns related to the impact of increasing urbanisation and ex- The Po River has 141 main tributaries and the related river ploitation of water resources. A better understanding of the network has a total length of about 6750 km and 31 000 km hydrological regime of the river is necessary to improve wa- for natural and artificial channels, respectively. The average ter resources management and flood protection. In particu- volume of annual precipitation is 78 km3, of which 60 % is lar, the analysis of the effects of hydrological and climatic converted in outflow volume at the closure section. About change is crucial for planning sustainable development and 450 lakes are located in the Po River basin. The water level economic growth. An extremely interesting issue is to inspect of the larger south-alpine lakes of glacial origin is regulated to what extent river flows can be naturally affected by the according to given management policies, therefore obtaining occurrence of long periods of water abundance or scarcity, a regulation volume of 1.3 km3 approximately. It is interest- which can be erroneously interpreted as irreversible changes ing to mention that 9 hydro-ecoregions are identified within due to human impact. In fact, drought and flood periods alter- the Po River (Po River Basin Authority, 2006), which are de- natively occurred in the recent past in the form of long-term fined as geographic areas where freshwater ecosystems have fluctuations. This paper presents advanced graphical and an- a limited range of variation in terms of chemical, physical alytical methods to gain a better understanding of the tem- and biological characteristics (Wasson et al., 1996). poral distribution of the Po River discharge. In particular, we The above synthetic description clearly highlights the present an analysis of river flow variability and persistence complexity of Po River basin, where significantly differ- properties, to gain a better understanding of natural patterns, ent hydrological behaviours and ecosystems coexist and co- and in particular long-term changes, which may affect the evolve. In fact, it is interesting to note that the Po River Basin future flood risk and availability of water resources. Authority (2006) has identified 12 different fluvial regimes in the Po catchment. Figure 1 presents a schematic map of the Po River basin, while Fig. 2 shows the spatial distribution of rainfall over the catchment. 1 Introduction The history of the Po River floods is well known. In fact, starting from the middle age the lands surrounding the river The Po River is known to the public as the longest river were intensively cultivated. As a consequence, high river entirely flowing in the Italian peninsula, being its main stages have significantly impacted local communities since stream about 652 km long. It is also the Italian river with the that time and were thus recorded. The magnitude of the river 2 most extended catchment, whose area is about 71 000 km flows for ancient events is not known, and therefore it is at the delta. Its observed discharge time series at the clo- difficult to assess the severity of the recorded floods. By sure river cross section, which is conventionally located at observing their frequency, one may assess that events with ◦ 0 00 ◦ 0 00 Pontelagoscuro (44 53 19.34 N and 11 36 29.60 E), in- about 5-yr return period were recorded. In fact, historical cludes the observed values in Italy of largest minimum,
Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 3740 A. Montanari: Changing patterns in Po River discharge
Fig. 2. Mean annual rainfall over the Po River basin (from Po River Basin Authority, 2006).
their persistence properties, to gain a better understanding of Fig. 1. Map of the Po River basin (from Wikipedia). the behaviours of the river regime, the possible presence of footprints of human impact and the occurrence of the above anomalous periods of water abundance and scarcity. information enables us to assess that 22, 14 and 18 floods occurred in the 16th, 17th and 18th century, respectively. The 1705 flood was recorded as a particularly destructive 2 Anthropisation and sustainability event. In the 19th century there were 19 floods, with the severest ones occurring in 1801, 1839, 1846, 1857, 1868 and The downstream reach of the Po River flows across the 1872. The most important floods in the 20th century occurred Padana Plain, a flat and fertile area that is very attractive for in 1926, 1928, 1937, 1945, 1949, 1951, 1953, 1957, 1959, human settlement. In fact, it experienced an intensive agri- 1966, 1968, 1976, 1977, 1986, 1993, 1994 and 2000. The cultural and industrial development during the 20th century, 1951 flood was particularly severe, with inundations due to in particular after the Second World War. Currently, about broken embankments occurring at Gualtieri (close to Reggio 17 million people live in the Po River basin, where 40 % of Emilia) and Occhiobello (close to Ferrara). the gross domestic product of Italy is produced (Po River The hydrological behaviours of the Po River have been Basin Authority, 2006). Employment, agricultural produc- extensively studied, especially for what refers to the flood tion and energy consumption in the Po River basin amount regime (see for example, Marchi, 1994; Visentini, 1953; Pic- to 46 %, 35 % and 48 %, respectively, of the Italian total. In coli, 1976; Zanchettini et al., 2008). However, many relevant fact, water resources are intensely exploited in the catchment questions are still open on the hydrology of the Po River, and for irrigation, hydro-power production, civil and industrial in particular with regard to the impact of the intense human use. The mean annual hydrological fluxes for the Po River activity that has developed in the catchment during the 20th basin are summarised in Fig. 3 (see also Po River Basin Au- century and the impact of climate change. In fact, the occur- thority, 2006). In detail, the aforementioned average volume rence of long periods characterised by abundance or scarcity of annual precipitation feeds the river discharge at the out- of river flows led to the development of scientific questions let, the annual inflow to the underground aquifer (approxi- that are largely unexplored. mately 9 km3) and evapotranspiration from vegetation (ap- In a more general context, the analysis of the persistence proximately 20–25 km3). The withdrawal from the aquifer properties of complex river systems is attracting a renewed is about 6.5 km3, thus revealing that groundwater resources interest today, in view of the related implications on natural are close to overexploitation (deep percolation is about 1 km3 hydrological variability in the face of environmental change. and there is some groundwater flow to the sea). Thus, the Within this respect, a relevant role is played by long-term margins to ensure future sustainability of groundwater re- persistence, which means that river flows may keep memory sources are limited, especially during years with lower than of their past for a very extended period (Cohn and Lins, 2005; average rainfall. The annual water withdrawal for irrigation, Mudelsee, 2007; Koutsoyiannis, 2003, 2010). As a matter of which contributes to evapotranspiration, is 17 km3, while wa- fact, long-term persistence implies the presence of fluctua- ter withdrawals for industrial and civil use amount to 5 m3, tions that may behave as irreversible tendencies in the short 80 % of which being withdrawn from groundwater. Most of term and therefore have important consequences on flood this latter flux evaporates and part of it contributes to the re- mitigation and water resources management. turn flow to the river. This paper makes use of advanced graphical and analytical The overall situation depicted in Fig. 3 reveals an intense techniques to inspect the variability of the Po River flows and exploitation of water resources that is currently sustainable
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3739–3747, 2012 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3739/2012/ A. Montanari: Changing patterns in Po River discharge 3741
acterised by a mixed pluvial/alpine regime, and the Stura di Lanzo River, where the alpine regime is dominant. The Dora Baltea River is a typical example of alpine regime, with one peak flow period only that occurs during sum- mer. The human impact along the tributaries is mainly due to urbanisation, river training, artificial reservoirs and wa- ter withdrawal for irrigation and civil use. River training and water storage/withdrawal may have a significant impact on the occurrence of floods and droughts. However, a vi- sual inspection of the river flow data did not provide any clear evidence of the presence of non-stationarity during the observation period. Further information on the above tribu- taries can be found in the Water Resources Protection Plan Fig. 3. Mean annual main hydrological fluxes for the Po River basin. of the Italian administrative regions Piemonte (available on- line at http://www.regione.piemonte.it/acqua/pianoditutela/ tutela.htm, in Italian) and Valle D’Aosta (available online at on average, as we previously mentioned, but it is poten- http://www.regione.vda.it, in Italian). tially problematic during drought periods. Increasing arti- The seasonal component for the time series presented in ficial water storage and water withdrawals for irrigation is Table 1 was estimated by computing the daily average flow, an option that has been considered. However, concerns have for each calendar day, across the years of the observation pe- been expressed about reducing the river outflow to the sea, riod. The LOESS smoother was applied to reduce the vari- which would exacerbate water quality problems along the ability of the periodical component, with a 30-day interpo- river reach and the coastal areas. It is clear that efficient wa- lation window (Grimaldi and Montanari, 2000). Figure 4 ter resources management strategies are needed to ensure fu- shows the obtained seasonal components. They reflect the ture sustainability of water uses, which need to be supported dominant climatic behaviours and thus confirm what was by a detailed analysis of river discharge variability. Not sur- anticipated in Table 1. It is interesting to note that the sea- prisingly, this research area is gaining increasing attention sonal components of the Po River at Piacenza and Ponte- by the international scientific community (see, for example, lagoscuro are characterised by a minor peak in spring that Bloeschl and Montanari, 2010). occurs around the end of March, which is likely due to melt- ing snow from mid-altitude mountains. For the Tanaro and 3 Analysis of river discharge variability Stura di Lanzo rivers, the late spring peak is anticipated and delayed, respectively, with respect to what is observed in the 3.1 Intra-annual analysis lower course of the Po River. The seasonal component for the Dora Baltea River is distinctly different, being characterized River discharge variability is frequently analysed in hydrol- by a single peak in the summer months, as expected. ogy with reference to the intra-annual period, in order to es- timate the seasonal component, namely the progress of the 3.2 Inter-annual analysis: assessment of patterns in average river flow along the year. The seasonal component peak and low flows was herein estimated for the daily river flow time series ob- served along the Po River at Pontelagoscuro, Piacenza and The intra-annual variability analysis carried out in the previ- Moncalieri, as well as for the tributaries Stura di Lanzo River ous section provides indications about water resources avail- at Lanzo, Tanaro River at Farigliano and Dora Baltea River ability in different periods of the year, but it does not pro- at Tavagnasco. Table 1 reports the observation period of the vide any information on the possible presence of inter-annual series, their mean value and standard deviation along with trends. Actually, these latter are important because they may the catchment area and synthetic information on the domi- be due to human impact and imply long-term variations that nant fluvial regime. The series are complete; that is, they are may affect the future efficiency of water resources manage- not affected by missing values. ment strategies. Inter-annual tendencies in time series are of- To complete the information provided by Table 1, one ten studied by analysing extreme flow values. For example, may note that the dominant flood season for the Po River Figs. 5 and 6 show the progress of the annual maximum and at Pontelagoscuro and Piacenza is autumn, while the peak minimum value, respectively, of the daily river flows of the discharge volumes are generally observed in late spring. At Po River at Pontelagoscuro, along with the related linear re- Moncalieri the alpine fluvial regime exerts a significant in- gression line estimated over the whole period. The results fluence. Accordingly, the discharge volume in autumn is re- show that an increasing and decreasing tendency seems to duced and the dominant flood season is late spring. Similar affect peak and drought flows, respectively, therefore imply- behaviours are observed for the Tanaro River, which is char- ing an exacerbation of the flood and drought risk in recent www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3739/2012/ Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3739–3747, 2012 3742 A. Montanari: Changing patterns in Po River discharge
Table 1. Observation period, mean value µ and standard deviation σ of the observed time series, along with the catchment area A at the considered location and the dominant fluvial regime according to the Po River Basin Authority (2006).
Location Period µ (m3 s−1) σ (m3 s−1) A (km2) Fluvial regime Po at Pontelagoscuro 1920–2009 1470 1007 71 000 Pluvial regime with two peak periods Po at Piacenza 1924–2009 959 773 42 030 Pluvial regime with two peak periods Po at Moncalieri 1942–1984 80 89 4885 Pluvial regime with two peak periods Tanaro at Farigliano 1944–1973 39 49 1522 Pluvial regime with two peak periods and high variability Stura di Lanzo at Lanzo 1946–1981 19 27 582 Mixed alpine and pluvial regime; autumn discharge is low Dora Baltea at Tavagnasco 1951–1989 91 78 3314 Alpine regime with only one peak during summer
Fig. 4. Seasonal components for the considered time series. years. Similar results have been repeatedly obtained by pre- assess the variability of the results along the observation pe- vious analyses carried out by local administrations. riod. The results of such analyses are presented in the Supple- However, it should be noted that the above trends are ment with animated pictures (see files regression-minima.gif scarcely relevant from a statistical perspective. In fact, as- and regression-maxima.gif). For the case of annual minima, suming that the data are independent and assuming that the 19 negative slope values are obtained against 22 positive null hypothesis of no trend is true, the p-values for the slope ones, while the average value is even positive, being equal of the linear regressions are 11 % and 26 % for annual max- to 0.18 m3 (s yr)−1. For the annual maxima the situation is ima and minima, respectively. As a matter of fact, the un- seemingly more clear, with 5 negative versus 36 positive certainty of the estimate is relevant and becomes even more slopes, with an average value of 9.24 m3 (s yr)−1. However, clear if one performed the linear regression over 41 subse- even in the latter case the average p-value of the slope of the quent 50-yr time windows, starting from 1920, in order to regression line is equal to 46 % only. These results show that
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3739–3747, 2012 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3739/2012/ A. Montanari: Changing patterns in Po River discharge 3743 /s) 3 10000
8000
6000
4000
2000 Maximum annual river discharge (m river annual Maximum 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009
Fig. 5. Annual maxima of the Po River at Pontelagoscuro daily dis- charge series (1920–2009) and linear regression line. /s) 3
1000
800 Fig. 7. 3-D representation of the Po River daily discharge time series 600 (1920–2009). The resulting surface was smoothed by applying a moving average and a Gaussian filter. 400
200 but it is difficult to obtain a clear picture when dealing with
Minimum annual river discharge (m river annual Minimum long series.
1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2009 A careful analysis was carried out for the series of the Po Fig. 6. Annual minima of the Po River at Pontelagoscuro daily dis- River at Pontelagoscuro by depicting the yearly time series charge series (1920–2009) and linear regression line. one by one. The results of such investigation are presented in the supplementary material with an animated picture (see file yearly-series.gif). They reveal the possible concentra- the long-term tendency of the river flow is not easy to as- tion of floods and droughts in some periods that are several sess, for local and opposite tendencies alternating irregularly years long. along time. In order to obtain an overall graphical representation of The above results show that the analysis of peak and low river discharge time series, for the purpose of detecting long- river flows that is traditionally carried out to detect trends is and short-term patterns, we devised a 3-dimensional repre- hardly useful to predict future configurations, even when ap- sentation where river discharge is plotted on the vertical axis plying robust tools such the linear regression to extended data as a function of the respective year and calendar day that bases like the Po River one. More refined analyses should are represented on the horizontal axes. The resulting surface be carried out to inspect the possible presence of patterns in needs to be smoothed to make it regular. Smoothing was ob- river flows, which should make use of all the observed values tained by applying a moving average filter followed by a of river discharge. Gaussian one. The width of the filter window was 25 and 10 adjacent values along the intra-annual and inter-annual 3.3 Inter-annual analysis: a graphical technique to direction, respectively. assess long-term variability Figure 7 shows the resulting surface for the Po River at Pontelagoscuro. An animated revolving version of the same Variability analysis and pattern identification for long hydro- figure is presented in the supplementary material with an an- logical time series is a complex task because seasonality is imated picture (see file perspective-discharge.gif) that allows superimposed to long-term and local behaviours, which are one to better identify local patterns. The seasonal regularity buried in a large amount of data. Analytical techniques, like can be clearly seen, as well as singularities in the inter-annual investigation of the persistence properties of the process, are direction that are extended well beyond the filter width. In useful tools but sometimes the presence of uncertainty makes particular, the summer drought is clearly exacerbated in the the physical interpretation of results cumbersome (see, for recent period, but a similar local perturbation occurred from instance, Sect. 3.4). Graphical techniques are more effec- 1940 to 1960, when a prolonged situation of water scarcity tive in providing a perspective on local and global patterns, occurred. The singularity arising from the occurrence of two www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3739/2012/ Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3739–3747, 2012 3744 A. Montanari: Changing patterns in Po River discharge
Fig. 8. Analysis of the variance for the considered time series. Black and red symbols refer to original (not deseasonalised) and deseasonalised daily series, respectively.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3739–3747, 2012 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3739/2012/ A. Montanari: Changing patterns in Po River discharge 3745
1995)