DOCSLIB.ORG

Port of the Future Concepts, Topics and Projects - Draft for Experts Validation.Docx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port of the Future Concepts, Topics and Projects - Draft for Experts Validation.Docx Ref. Ares(2018)5643872 - 05/11/2018 D1.5 Port of the Future concepts, topics and projects - draft for experts validation.docx Deliverable D1.5 Date: 5th November 2018 Document: D1.5 Port of the Future concepts, topics and projects - draft for experts validation Page 1 of 268 Print out date: 2018-11-05 Document status Deliverable lead PortExpertise Internal reviewer 1 Circle, Alexio Picco Internal reviewer 2 Circle, Beatrice Dauria Type Deliverable Work package 1 ID D1.5 Due date 31st August 2018 Delivery date 5th November 2018 Status final submitted Dissemination level Public Table 1: Document status Document history Contributions All partners Change description Update work from D1.1 by including additional assessments and update code lists. Update the definition of Ports Of the Future Integrate deliverables D1.2, D1.3 and D1.4 Final version 2018 11 05 Table 2: Document history D1.5 Port of the Future concepts, topics and projects - draft for experts validation Page 2/268 Print out date: 2018-11-05 Disclaimer The views represented in this document only reflect the views of the authors and not the views of Innovation & Networks Executive Agency (INEA) and the European Commission. INEA and the European Commission are not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained in this document. Furthermore, the information is provided “as is” and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information fit for any particular purpose. The user of the information uses it as its sole risk and liability D1.5 Port of the Future concepts, topics and projects - draft for experts validation Page 3 of 268 Print out date: 2018-11-05 Executive summary D1.5 Port of the Future concepts, topics and projects - draft for experts validation Page 4 of 268 Print out date: 2018-11-05 1 Executive summary The DocksTheFuture Project aims at defining the vision for the ports of the future in 2030, covering all specific issues that could define this concept. From the work performed in WP1 the essential concepts of a port of the future emerge (Section 4 Ports of the future defined on page 29). This report is the deliverable D1.5 Port of the Future concepts, topics and projects - draft for experts validation of work package 1 “Port of the Future”: definition of the concept. It is the combination of the following reports: 1. D.1 Desktop analysis of the concept including EU policies (Section 6.2 on page 40); A long list of over 347 inputs, that is projects, studies, white papers and the like, was established based upon the feedback of all project partners, and the subcontractors Lloyds’s register, TU Delft and Association des Villes Portuaires (AIVP). From this list, 78 inputs have been assessed. To perform the desktop study and information model (Section 9.1.1.1 on page 176) has been defined that is also very useful for the work of the next work packages and beyond the DocksTheFuture project;1 2. D1.2 Stakeholders consultation proceedings (Section 6.3 on page109); A consultation of private and public stakeholders reveals their focus on sustainability and digitalization and digital transformation; 3. D1.3 Maritime traffic analysis and forecast review – Key Results (Section 6.4 on page 122); 4. D1.4 Analysis of macro-trends and perspectives (Section 6.5 on page 149). Amongst the most important trends affecting the ports of the future are the climate change, the use of alternative fuel, the growing population and urbanisation, introduction of new technologies, shift of trade to non-OECD countries, and the increase of public debt. This document will be reviewed by experts during a thematic workshop (Section 6.6 on page 157) to become the final deliverable of work package 1: “Port of the Future concepts, topics and projects - consolidated versions. It will then serve as the basis for the next work packages of DocksTheFuture. A port of the future must be customer focused, in which customer covers both society, public entities and private companies. If we define sustainability as people, profit and planet (3P) then it covers most if not the full scope of the Port of the Future. 1. Much input deals with the people aspect both on safety, education, (re-)training and assistance in helping other port regions to become pools of economic activity, embedded in local communities; 2. While sometimes a negative connotation is given to profit, this aspect is of extreme importance to keep the sustainability drive going. Profit is not only to be considered from a business perspective, but also relates to port’s contribution to society, as they often make use of tax payers’ money. Profit is also quoted as invoking a mental shift among port authorities towards polluter pays principles and installing new revenue models that finance the huge investment costs of among others digitization; 3. Planet goes without saying. Ports are to grow with green, not against green. The analysis performed here shows a huge amount of good, economically viable solutions that often trigger new streams of cargo and created new clusters in the wider region of the port. 1 Taking into account the warning of George Box “ All models are wrong but some ar usefull D1.5 Port of the Future concepts, topics and projects - draft for experts validation Page 5 of 268 Print out date: 2018-11-05 Document info D1.5 Port of the Future concepts, topics and projects - draft for experts validation Page 6 of 268 Print out date: 2018-11-05 2 Document info 2.1 Table of contents 1 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................ 5 2 Document info ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Table of contents ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 List of figures ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.3 List of tables .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 Abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................. 13 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 24 4 Ports of the future defined .......................................................................................................... 29 5 EU policies and legislation .......................................................................................................... 34 6 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 39 6.1 Preliminary exploration of RIA’s ............................................................................................ 39 6.2 Task 1: Desktop analysis ........................................................................................................ 40 6.2.1 Methodology summary ................................................................................................... 40 6.2.2 Inputs and assessments ................................................................................................. 43 6.2.3 Topics ................................................................................................................................. 43 6.2.3.1 T10: Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 48 6.2.3.2 T20: Means of transport ......................................................................................... 53 6.2.3.3 T30: Accessibility ..................................................................................................... 55 6.2.3.4 T40: Standards ......................................................................................................... 59 6.2.3.5 T50: Integration in the supply chain ..................................................................... 62 6.2.3.6 T60: Sustainability ................................................................................................... 65 6.2.3.7 T70: Safety ................................................................................................................ 77 6.2.3.8 T80: Security ............................................................................................................. 79 6.2.3.9 T90: Digitization, digitalization and digital transformation .............................. 82 6.2.3.10 T100: Port city relations ......................................................................................... 89 6.2.3.11 T110: Human element ............................................................................................ 92 6.2.3.12 T120: Governance ................................................................................................... 95 6.2.3.13 T130: Incident management ................................................................................. 98 6.2.3.14 T900: Cooperation ................................................................................................... 99 6.2.3.15 T901: Competition ................................................................................................ 100 6.2.3.16 T910: Bridging R&D and implementation .......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smart Ports Point of View
    Smart Ports | Contents Smart Ports Point of View By Deloitte Port Services 00 Smart Ports | Contents Seaports are playing catch-up with the large transport & logistics players when it comes to developing insight driven solutions and IoT applications. 01 Smart Ports | Contents Contents Introduction 3 Need for Smart Ports is driven by industry challenges 6 From digital to smart 10 Challenges ahead 16 About the authors 18 02 Smart Ports | Introduction Introduction Currently, a tidal wave of technological innovation & integration is pushing industries and businesses to transform themselves in an effort to become more data, and insight-driven. The port industry is no exception. Being part of both larger transport projects remain isolated. At the equipment and requiring different and logistics (T&L) supply chains moment, ports in Western Europe types of products and services and in itself being a cluster of are leading the pack in these creates a complicated environment companies and businesses active in attempts. Although the Smart Port with multiple stakeholders. In the T&L sector, ports are in a and IoT initiatives are addition to heterogeneity of data, a unique position to fully grasp the commendable, there is still a long fear of transparency also remains a potential generated by these new way to go before we can truly speak major issue. Ports are typically high tech developments. of fully integrated ports that fully comprised of a cluster of competing capitalize on the potential of IoT companies. Within the wider T&L sector, and insight driven applications, in companies have begun other words true “Smart Ports”.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Containers Ltd. Annual Report 1999 Sea Containers Ltd
    Sea Containers Ltd. Annual Report 1999 Sea Containers Ltd. Front cover: The Amalfi Coast Sea Containers is a Bermuda company with operating seen from a terrace of the headquarters (through subsidiaries) in London, England. It Hotel Caruso in Ravello, Italy. is owned primarily by U.S. shareholders and its common Orient-Express Hotels acquired the Caruso in 1999 shares have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange and will reconstruct the prop- (SCRA and SCRB) since 1974. erty during 2000-2001 with a The Company engages in three main activities: passenger view to re-opening in the transport, marine container leasing and the leisure business. spring of 2002. Capri and Paestum are nearby. Demand Passenger transport includes 100% ownership of Hoverspeed for luxury hotel accommodation Ltd., cross-English Channel fast ferry operators, the Isle of on the Amalfi Coast greatly Man Steam Packet Company, operators of fast and conven- exceeds supply. tional ferry services to and from the Isle of Man, the Great North Eastern Railway, operators of train services between London and Scotland, and 50% ownership of Neptun Maritime Oyj whose subsidiary Silja Line operates Contents fast and conventional ferry services in Scandinavia. Company description 2 Marine container leasing is conducted primarily through GE SeaCo SRL, a Barbados company owned 50% by Financial highlights 3 Sea Containers and 50% by GE Capital Corporation. Directors and officers 4 GE SeaCo is the largest lessor of marine containers in the world with a fleet of 1.1 million units. President’s letter to shareholders 7 The leisure business is conducted through Orient-Express Discussion by Division: Hotels Ltd., also a Bermuda company, which is 100% owned by Sea Containers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rail Freight Challenge for Emerging Economies How to Regain Modal Share
    The Rail Freight Challenge for Emerging Economies How to Regain Modal Share Bernard Aritua INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN FOCUS INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN FOCUS The Rail Freight Challenge for Emerging Economies How to Regain Modal Share Bernard Aritua © 2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 22 21 20 19 Books in this series are published to communicate the results of Bank research, analysis, and operational experience with the least possible delay. The extent of language editing varies from book to book. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpre- tations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Port Capacity: a Practical Method for Investment and Policy Decisions
    Revisiting Port Capacity: A practical method for Investment and Policy decisions Ioannis N. Lagoudis Head of R&D, XRTC Ltd, Business Consultants 95 Akti Miaouli Str., 18538, Piraeus, Greece & Adjunct Faculty, University of the Aegean – Department of Shipping trade and Transport 2A Korai Str., 82100, Chios, Greece and James B. Rice, Jr. Deputy Director, MIT – Center for Transportation and Logistics 1 Amherst Street, Second Floor,Cambridge, MA 02142 Abstract The paper revisits port capacity providing a more holistic approach via including immediate port connections from the seaside and the hinterland. The methodology provided adopts a systemic approach encapsulating the different port terminals along with the seaside and hinterland connections providing a holistic estimation of port capacity. Capacity is defined with the use of two dimensions; static and dynamic. Static capacity relates to land availability or in other words the available space for use. Dynamic capacity is determined by the available technology of equipment in combination to the skill of available labor. With the presentation of a case study from a container terminal the practical use of this methodology is illustrated. Based on the data provided by the terminal operator the results showed that there is still available space to be utilised at a static level and also room more improvement at a dynamic level. The benefits stemming from the above methodology are multidimensional with the key ones being the flexible framework adjusted to the needs of each port system for measuring capacity, the productivity estimation of the different business processes involved in the movement of goods and people and the evaluation of the financial performance of the different business units and the port as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Smart Ports: Key Concepts and Global Best Practices
    i Acknowledgments The present publication was prepared by the Transport Connectivity and Logistics Section, Transport Division, ESCAP, based on country reports prepared by national consultants and the proceedings of the Online Expert Group Meeting on “Smart Port Development for sustainable maritime connectivity in Asia and the Pacific”, held in Bangkok on 27 November 2020. The Expert group meeting was attended by a total of 75 participants from Ministries of Transport and Maritime Administrations from member countries, as well as representatives of intergovernmental organizations, port authorities, universities, research institutes and the private sector. The study was led by Mr. Sooyeob Kim, Economic Affairs Officer, Transport Division with Mr. Changju Lee, Economic Affairs Officer and Ms. Kyeongrim Ahn as core authors; under the general supervision of Ms. Azhar Jaimurzina Ducrest, Chief of Transport Connectivity and Logistics Section. Recognition of contributions is also accorded to Mr. Kiwook Chang, Expert on port infrastructure and logistics of Transport Connectivity and Logistics Section, and Mr. Ang Chin Hup, Mr. Deng Yanjie, Mr. Myo Nyein Aye, Mr. Sophornna Ros, Mr. The Cuong Trinh and Mr. Tony Oliver for their technical input to the study. This study report was prepared by ESCAP with financial assistance and technical input from the Korea Port and Harbours Association. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Containerization Has So Revolutionized the Ocean Transportation of Cargo That It Is, Today, the Standard Method of Transporting Break Bulk Cargo
    “ON DECK STOWAGE OF CONTAINERS” Prepared by: American Institute of Marine Underwriters Technical Services Committee Page 1 of 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Loss Experience 3 Types of Containers 4 Types of Containerships 6 Securing Devices of Container Vessels 8 Stowage & Collapse of Stow Issues 11 Stowage of Containers on Barges 15 Cargo Securing Manuals 17 Operational Issues 18 Comments and Recommendations 22 References 24 Revision History 25 Attachments: 26 List of Container Casualties Securing Hardware Diagrams Page 2 of 29 “On Deck Stowage of Containers” AIMU Technical Services Committee Introduction: Containerization has so revolutionized the ocean transportation of cargo that it is, today, the standard method of transporting break bulk cargo. Container ships have been plying the seas for a few decades and we are now seeing large container ships, capable of carrying 8,000 – 10,000 containers, with tiers of up to 8 high. Although this represents a tremendous economy of scale in the transporting of containers, we have seen a number of highly publicized incidents, involving the loss of large numbers of containers of containers overboard, during ocean transit. These incidents have resulted in additional damage to hundreds of other containers aboard the ship, as well as endangering the safety of the ship itself. Further, partially submerged containers pose a hazard to navigation to other vessels, particularly fishing vessels and small craft, as well as a potential environmental hazard. The first generation of container ships provided for carriage of containers on deck in tiers of only two high. The next generation allowed for carriage of containers on deck up to four tiers high.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Intermodal Industry
    Intermodal Industry Overview - History of Containers and Intermodal Industry - Intermodal Operations - Chassis and Chassis Pools TRAC Intermodal Investor Relations 1 Strictly Private and Confidential Index Page • History of Containers and Intermodal Industry 4 • Intermodal Operations 13 • Chassis and Chassis Pools 36 2 Strictly Private and Confidential What is Intermodal? • Intermodal freight transportation involves the movement of goods using multiple modes of transportation - rail, ship, and truck. Freight is loaded in an intermodal container which enables movement across the various modes, reduces cargo handling, improves security and reduces freight damage and loss. 3 Strictly Private and Confidential Overview HISTORY OF CONTAINERS AND INTERMODAL INDUSTRY 4 Strictly Private and Confidential Containerization Changed the Intermodal Industry • Intermodal Timeline: – By Hand - beginning of time – Pallets • started in 1940’s during the war to move cargo more quickly with less handlers required – Containerization: Marine • First container ship built in 1955, 58 containers plus regular cargo • Marine containers became standard in U.S. in 1960s (Malcom McLean 1956 – Sea Land, SS Ideal X, 800 TEUs) • Different sizes in use, McLean used 35’ • 20/40/45 standardized sizes for Marine 5 Strictly Private and Confidential Containerization Changed the Intermodal Industry • Intermodal Timeline: – Containerization: Domestic Railroads • Earliest containers were for bulk – coal, sand, grains, etc. – 1800’s • Piggy backing was introduced in the early 1950’s
    [Show full text]
  • Traxens Presents Solutions for Port Industry at Smart Ports Barcelona
    Traxens presents solutions for port industry at Smart Ports Barcelona Company develops bespoke IoT and big data offering to meet specific needs of port industry players and solve business challenges for both assets and cargo owners worldwide Smart Ports Barcelona takes place November 19-21 Marseille, France, November 13, 2019 – Traxens, a company providing high-value data and services for the supply chain industry, announces today that it will present its smart asset tracking solutions at the Smart Ports Barcelona event, Smart Ports, Piers of the Future, November 19 to 21. Its tailored Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) solutions are specifically designed to meet the needs of the port industry by providing near real- time insight into the end-to-end global supply chain. Traxens’ solution provides comprehensive, precise and timely data on cargo, through tracking logistic assets in transit anywhere in the world. Traxens’ patented breakthrough Internet of Things (IoT) technology brings improved efficiency and security, greater transparency and enhanced asset utilization whilst opening up new opportunities for all actors involved in the global supply chain. With Traxens’ solutions, ports can improve their efficiency and the interoperability of the systems with a trusted third party. For example, the Cargo Community System (CCS) manages traceability within the port area, but it also needs to capture information in the hinterland, and, in general, during the pre- and post-shipment phases. This is made possible with the Traxens solution; its objective is to improve the real-time information and predictivity of the flow of goods, to streamline overall port operations. More specifically, for export, information gathered on pre- and post-carriage and on the activity in the hinterland can help determine the ETA (Estimated Time of Arrival) at port gates.
    [Show full text]
  • Containerization in Transporting Agricultural P Erishahles JOHN E
    Containerization in Transporting Agricultural P erishahles JOHN E. CLAYTON Chief, Transportation Research Branch, Transportation and Facilities Research Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture • CONTAINERlZATION seems to have geuera led r e11ewed inter e::> t, enthusiasm and activity in freight transport. Its use may be extended to all modes of transport, with the addition of many new products; and it may become worldwide. Nearly every issue of the transport press reports expansion of containerization by one firm or another, to products and regions it has not reached before. Rail transport firms are buying more van containers and piggyback trailers. Ocean carriers are planning to buy container ships or convert regular cargo ships for containerized transport to overseas points. Firms already engaged in ocean container service are planning to extend it to other parts of the world. This increased interest, enthusiasm and activity applies to con­ tainerized movement of both perishable and nonperishable products. What causes the increased.interest-and investment-in the piggyback-containerization technique? The answer is efficiency-a better transport job- in terms of lower cost, less product losses, and more rapid movement. Cost can be reduced because contain­ erization serves as an effective means of integrating the services of different transport modes and uses more fully the inherent advantages of each mode. Containerization reduces the number of handlings of individual packages which results in less loss and pilferage. It also permits quicker transfer of cargo from one transport mode to another, thus r educing transit time and increasing utilization of transport investment. It has been estimated, for example, that container ships spend only one-fifth as much time in port loading and unloading cargo as do conventional ships.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Roll-On-Roll-Off, Lift-On-Lift-Off Cargo Handling Operations
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1965 A comparative analysis of roll-on-roll-off, lift-on-lift-off cargo handling operations. Heeley, Eric W. L. Monterey, California: U.S. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/11791 YKN° V: ffi ".^SCHOOL A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ROLL-ON-ROLL-OFF LIFT -ON-LIFT -OFF CARGO HANDLING OPERATIONS ***##*# Eric ¥. L. Heeley A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ROLL-ON -ROLL-OFF LIFT-ON-LIFT-OFF CARGO HANDLING OPERATIONS b7 Eric ¥. L.,|Heeley Lieutenant, UnitedyS^tes Navy Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT United States Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 19 6 5 si A COMPARATIVE ANAUSIS OF ROLL-ON-ROLL-OFF LIFT-ON-LIFT-OFF CARGO HANDLING OPERATIONS by Eric W. L. Heeley This work is accepted as fulfilling the Research Paper requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT from the United States Naval Postgraduate School ABSTRACT « The roll-on- roll-<fr£f and lift-on-lift-off cargo handling concepts have developed rapidly in the trans- portation field since the early 1950' s. The utilization of these two concepts has revolutionized the transportation industry. Based on the information available and the comparative analysis made it can be seen that the economical advantages of the lift-on-lift-off operation are more applicable to commercial transportation, whereas the fast turn-around features of the roll-on-roll-off operation are of particular importance in the logistics field for successful support of Military operations TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I, Introduction 1 II • Containerization 8 J III, Roll-on-Roll-off Concept 21 IV* Life-on-Lift-off Concept 37 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Containerization of Commodities: Integrating Inland Ports with Gateways and Corridors in Western Canada
    The Containerization of Commodities: Integrating Inland Ports with Gateways and Corridors in Western Canada Jean-Paul Rodrigue, PhD Van Horne Researcher in Transportation and Logistics Professor, Hofstra University April 2012 2 Executive Summary This report provides an analysis of the major trends in the containerization of commodities and looks at its commercial potential and operational hurdles. The setting of inland ports in Western Canada is seen as a strategy to help reconcile import (retail dominated) and export (commodities dominated) logistics. The containerization of commodities involves the development and expansion of a niche market that can fluctuate according to the price of the respective commodities, the nature and extent of the demand and container shipping rates. All of these are commodity specific and will convey new opportunities for commodity exporters and buyers alike. The last decade have been prone to the containerization of commodities as container shipping rates remained relatively constant while the price of most commodity groups doubled or tripled. Containerization enables a better level of inventory management of commodities. Yet, the availability of containers is a recurring challenge since maritime shipping companies, as dominant managers of containerized assets, will allocate them where there are commercial opportunities to recoup the costs of having these containers circulating outside their shipping and port networks. A growing level of intermodal integration is being observed in Western Canada, which reflects a trend observed across North America and elsewhere around the world. Inland ports are likely to be the missing multiplying effect that would encourage maritime shipping companies to have a larger number of containerized assets moving inland.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Subaqueous Dredged Material Capping
    Technical Report DOER-1 June 1998 US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Dredging Operations and Environmental Research Program Guidance for Subaqueous Dredged Material Capping by Michael R. Palermo, James E. Clausner, Marian P. Rollings Gregory L. Williams, Tommy E. Myers, WES Thomas J. Fredette, New England District Robert E. Randall, Texas A&M University Approved For Public Release; Distribution Is Unlimited Prepared for Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. The findings of this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position, unless so desig- nated by other authorized documents. PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Dredging Operations and Technical Report DOER-1 Environmental Research Program June 1998 Guidance for Subaqueous Dredged Material Capping by Michael R. Palermo, James E. Clausner, Marian P. Rollings Gregory L. Williams, Tommy E. Myers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Thomas J. Fredette U.S. Army Engineer District, New England 696 Virginia Road Concord, MA 01742-2751 Robert E. Randall Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843 Final report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Waterways Experiment Station Cataloging-in-Publication Data Guidance for subaqueous dredged material capping / by Michael R. Palermo ... [et al.] ; prepared for U.S.
    [Show full text]