DOCSLIB.ORG

Version 1 FPF(Reformatted 29.10.09).Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Version 1 FPF(Reformatted 29.10.09).Indd The area plans recognise that each area of the city faces 5 Area plans different issues, requiring different planning solutions. They sit below the citywide spatial framework (which applies Introduction to the city as a whole) providing more specific detail of how each area should develop and grow. However, the In this chapter we will look in more depth at the 10 area relationship between the two tiers is symbiotic, with the plans that Auckland City Council has developed for the plans and outcomes for each tier informing and reinforcing Auckland isthmus, excluding the CBD. the other. The area plans form the second tier to Council’s future Area plans will enable people to identify (on a broad scale) planning framework. They describe in more detail the land the choices and opportunities that each area of the city has uses and types of activities and buildings that the council to offer with respect to residential and business activities. plans for each area of the city. The areas are: They provide a useful tool for people and businesses looking for land with a particular use in mind. However, it is • Avondale/Blockhouse Bay important to note that the plans are not intended to portray • Eastern Bays neighbourhoods that contain homogenous types of activities • Eden/Albert and environments. Rather, they describe the general future • Maungakiekie form and function of areas, and the building types that may, • Mt Roskill/Hillsborough over time, come to predominate in them. • Newmarket/Parnell • Otāhuhu Figure 37 shows the boundaries of the 10 areas of the • Remuera/Meadowbank Auckland isthmus. There is a separate plan for each area. • Tāmaki However, the boundaries of the areas are soft and the 10 • Western Bays. area plans should be treated as pieces of a jigsaw that work together to form a coherent whole. The area plans bring together the key elements that make up an area (including its natural and cultural heritage The third tier in the future planning framework is precinct, features, built form and transport routes) to form an centre and corridor planning. Precinct planning is more integrated picture of how the area should look and function detailed than area planning, and will inform preparation of a in the future. The plans summarise the challenges and district plan for Auckland. opportunities that the areas face, and set out the specific outcomes that the council hopes to achieve for each area over the life of its plan (to 2030). These outcomes feed into and will help achieve the council’s six high-level strategies for Auckland city (as discussed in chapter 3): • quality built environment • economic development • lifestyle choices • quality natural environment • strong and healthy communities • transport choices. 57 Figure 37: Areas of the Auckland isthmus 58 5.1 Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area plan summary Figure 38: Avondale/ Blockhouse Bay area outcomes 2030 (see 6.5 Appendix E for map legends) 59 This summary is a snapshot of how the Avondale/Blockhouse Recognising and supporting the differing functions of the Bay area is likely to develop over the next 21 years, including area’s business and retail centres will also be crucial if they the key outcomes the council (and others) will be working are to thrive. Some local and neighbourhood centres will towards. need to expand if people are to have shops and services within easy walking distance. The area at present Infrastructure (including stormwater, wastewater and Located in the west of the Auckland isthmus, the Avondale/ transport) must be provided to cater for growth. While Blockhouse Bay area includes the suburbs of Rosebank, major transport infrastructure projects scheduled for the Waterview, Avondale, New Windsor and Blockhouse Bay. near future (the relocation and upgrade of Avondale railway The communities in the area are some of Auckland city’s station, and the extension of State Highway 20) will improve most diverse, with many Pacific Island and Asian people access to the area, there is still a need for better public represented among its approximately 40,000 residents transport and pedestrian and cycling facilities, and improved (about 10 per cent of Auckland city’s population). connections between residential and business areas. The area has a mix of single houses on medium to large sites People will also need places to play and relax, and although and more recent infill housing. The Avondale/Blockhouse there are significant open spaces in Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area also has substantial areas of industrial and business Bay area, some (such as the coastal walkway) are under- activity, providing jobs for more than 10,700 people. developed or seen as unsafe, while others (such as the racecourse) are in private ownership. New Windsor, in The area is well known for its racecourse and its Sunday particular, is under-served in terms of parks and recreational markets. The Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area also boasts facilities. the most continuous cover of indigenous forest remaining in the city (on the cliffs at Blockhouse Bay) and several key Key outcomes cultural heritage sites of significance to Māori based around the Whau River and its estuary, Manukau Harbour and Te Table 4 lists some of the key outcomes that the council Auaunga-Oakley Creek. will seek to achieve for the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area between now and 2030. The outcomes have been grouped Challenges and opportunities under the citywide key moves that they help to achieve. Providing for both residential and business growth is a key Work on some of the outcomes is already underway, with issue for the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area. Preferably, the funding allocated in the council’s 2009 ten-year plan. Others bulk of growth in the area will occur around Avondale town remain aspirations at this stage, either because funding still centre (within walking distance to the railway station) with needs to be found or because the council needs to work new development being well-managed and high quality. It is with other organisations to make them a reality. Where the also important that better use is made of the area’s existing council cannot achieve an outcome, but needs to advocate business land, with further development envisaged on the to others to provide it, this has been indicated. Rosebank Peninsula, at the Lansford Crescent business area and within Avondale town centre. 60 Table 4: Key outcomes for the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area between now and 2030 Green the city and protect our heritage The natural heritage values (including geological features) of the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay Area are respectfully managed, which may include: • protecting and enhancing Whau Creek and Te Auaunga-Oakley Creek, with their drainage functions retained. The ecological values of the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area are protected and enhanced by: • providing green linkages along the Manukau and Waitematā Harbour coastlines; Te Auaunga-Oakley Creek and Whau Creek; from Whau Creek to Craigavon Park and Blockhouse Bay Recreation Reserve; through the Avondale Racecourse to the coast; and along the western railway and north-western motorway. The council will advocate to the New Zealand Transport Agency and ONTRACK for the latter two • managing Motu Manawa-Pollen and Traherne islands, and the forest on the Manukau Harbour’s coastline in a way that respects their ecological values. The cultural heritage values (including archaeological and Māori sites of signifi cance) of the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area are respectfully managed. Particular areas of focus may include: • Te Auaunga-Oakley Creek • Motu Manawa-Pollen Island Marine Reserve • Waterview Interchange • Te Whau Point. The heritage values of the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area are retained, including those associated with the residential heritage and traditional town centres in the area. Growth eras that may be particularly evident in the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area include: • Victorian/Edwardian growth • inter-war development • post-war development • recent growth Avondale consists predominantly of development from the Post-war era, with some minor areas from the Recent Growth era. Open spaces within the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area are safe, secure, accessible and welcoming: • there are low-rise apartments and terrace houses (two to four storeys) alongside sections of Te Auaunga-Oakley Creek and on the southern side of Avondale Racecourse, increasing surveillance over parts of those open spaces • the impact of development associated with State Highway 20 on Waterview Reserve is minimised • in the long term, open spaces in New Windsor are improved, including a new community open space at 72 to 80 Tiverton Road • Heron Park is more accessible • the area’s open spaces cater well for pedestrians and cyclists, in particular along the coastal esplanade, across Alan Wood Reserve (from Methuen Road to Hendon Road), at Riversdale, Eastdale, Chalmers and Wolverton Reserves, and at Olympic and Craigavon Parks. The Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area has improved pedestrian and cycling routes: • along the Manukau and Waitematā Harbour coastlines; from the Waitematā Harbour to the Manukau Harbour along the historic portage route; to and along Te Auaunga-Oakley Creek and Whau Creek; from the Whau Creek to the Blockhouse Bay Recreation Reserve; through Avondale Racecourse to the coast and Waitakere City; and from Heron Park to Eastdale Reserve • continuous access around the Manukau and Waitematā Harbour coastlines (as far as practicable), including tidal access in places. Infrastructure in the Avondale/Blockhouse Bay area is improved: • areawide stormwater and wastewater infrastructure upgrades to accommodate growth, improve water quality and reduce fl ood risks. The council will work with Metro Water Ltd and Watercare Services Ltd to achieve this • the council will advocate to Transpower for high-voltage electricity transmission lines throughout the area to be placed underground. Avondale Racecourse’s sports fi elds and Sunday markets are maintained, with better access provided to them for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard
    Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay1 and Graham Leonard2 1School of Environment & Institute of Earth Science and Engineering, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected] 2GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand; [email protected] IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 This report was prepared by IESE as part of the DEVORA Project. Disclaimer: While the information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of publication, the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and its working parties and agents involved in preparation and publication, do not accept any liability for its contents or for any consequences arising from its use. Copyright: This work is copyright of the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering. The content may be used with acknowledgement to the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and the appropriate citation. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annexure a to Procedural Minute 6
    Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Appendix 3.1 Schedule for the Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Owner/ Approral/ Sub#/ Point Name Theme Topic Subtopic Summary Submission Type Support Evidence Comentary Investigate 81 Mt Royal Rd, Mt Albert, and all other lava cave Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the entrances, for inclusion in the SEA schedule [Note - relates to Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features ONFs. Refer to Albert-Eden Local Board Views, Volume 26, page 5716-3481 Auckland Council Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add 30/103]. Local Government no iv Investigate the 'Spring', located under Crystal Motors at 11 Ruru Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the St, Eden Terrace, for inclusion in the SEA schedule [Note - Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features relates to ONFs. Refer to Albert-Eden Local Board Views, Volume 5716-3482 Auckland Council Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add 26, page 30/103]. Local Government no iv Auckland Volcanic Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the Include volcanic features in former outlying district such as Cones Society Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features Franklin within the PAUP including Pukekohe Hill, Puni Mountain, 4485-11 Incorporated Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add Pukekohe East crater. Key Stakeholder no iv Auckland Volcanic Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the Cones Society Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features Include Pukekohe Hill and Puni Mountain as outstanding natural 4485-13 Incorporated Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add features. Key Stakeholder no iv Auckland Volcanic Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the Cones Society Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features Apply V1 and V2 overlays to volcanic reserves and surrounding 4485-21 Incorporated Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add Includeareas.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Board Information and Agreements Draft Long-Term Plan 2012-2022
    DRAFT LONG-TERM PLAN 2012-2022_ VOLUME FOUR LOCAL BOARD INFORMATION AND AGREEMENTS DRAFT LONG-TERM PLAN 2012-2022_ VOLUME FOUR LOCAL BOARD INFORMATION AND AGREEMENTS About this volume About this volume This is Volume Four of the four volumes that make up the draft LTP. It is set out in two parts, one which provides background on the role of local boards, their decision-making responsibilities and some general information about local board plans and physical boundaries. The second part contains the individual local board agreements for all 21 local boards, which contain detailed information about local activities, services, projects and programmes and the corresponding budgets for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013. Here we have also included additional information like ten-year budgets for each board and a capital projects list. What this volume covers: the status of draft local board agreements how to have your say during the public consultation period an overview of the local boards local board activities information on the development of local board plans and agreements local board financial information including a consolidated statement of expenditure on local activities about each local board, with an overview of the local board including their strategic priorities and a message from the chairperson draft local board agreements for each local board covering scope of activities levels of service and performance measures local activities including key initiatives and projects expenditure and funding notes to the local board agreements contact details, how to contact your local board, including individual contact details for each local board member an appendix to each Local Board information section which includes their expenditure statements and capital projects for the ten-year period 2012 to 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Analogues for Miocene to Pleistocene Alkali
    Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. • 2(3) • 2010 • 339-361 DOI: 10.2478/v10085-010-0013-8 Central European Journal of Geosciences Modern analogues for Miocene to Pleistocene alkali basaltic phreatomagmatic fields in the Pannonian Basin: “soft-substrate” to “combined” aquifer controlled phreatomagmatism in intraplate volcanic fields Research Article Károly Németh1∗, Shane J. Cronin1, Miguel J. Haller2, Marco Brenna1, Gábor Csillag3 1 Volcanic Risk Solutions CS-INR, Massey University, PO Box 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2 Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco – Sede Puerto Madryn, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina, 3 Geological Institute of Hungary, Department of Geological Research, Stefánia út 14, Budapest H-1143, Hungary, Received 29 April 2010; accepted 4 June 2010 Abstract: The Pannonian Basin (Central Europe) hosts numerous alkali basaltic volcanic fields in an area similar to 200 000 km2. These volcanic fields were formed in an approximate time span of 8 million years producing small- volume volcanoes typically considered to be monogenetic. Polycyclic monogenetic volcanic complexes are also common in each field however. The original morphology of volcanic landforms, especially phreatomagmatic volcanoes, is commonly modified. by erosion, commonly aided by tectonic uplift. The phreatomagmatic volcanoes eroded to the level of their sub-surface architecture expose crater to conduit filling as well as diatreme facies of pyroclastic rock assemblages. Uncertainties due to the strong erosion influenced by tectonic uplifts, fast and broad climatic changes, vegetation cover variations, and rapidly changing fluvio-lacustrine events in the past 8 million years in the Pannonian Basin have created a need to reconstruct and visualise the paleoenvironment into which the monogenetic volcanoes erupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Activities and Services of Auckland Council Introduction
    Part II: Activities and services Introduction PART II ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES OF AUCKLAND COUNCIL INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW Auckland Council provides a range of goods and services. These are detailed in the following sections where the activities undertaken by the council and its CCOs are described. Each section includes details of the expenditure, the projects and achievements together with the levels of service which were provided and details of the performance measures. The performance measures describe either what we set out to achieve or levels of customer satisfaction. Results show performance against the standard (target) we set ourselves. The sections provide information about: • the groups of activities undertaken by Auckland Council. Activities are grouped together because of their connectivity with each other • individual activities undertaken. Individual activities are goods and services delivered to the community – for example, the provision of facilities, providing grants and the performance of regulatory and other functions. Note that some activities are provided by the CCOs. While each set of performance measures, results and commentaries cover the full activity provided by the council and Group, only the portions funded directly by the council are covered in the financial statements. A summary of the total expenditure of the CCOs is covered in the CCO section. Following the sections about the council’s activities, there is coverage of the activities of the 21 local boards, and this is followed by the CCO section. The council has 11 groups of activities: • Community • Lifestyle and Culture • Economic Development • Planning and Regulation • Environmental Management • Solid Waste • Water Supply and Wastewater • Stormwater • Transport • Commercial and Investment • Governance Auckland Council Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 52 Part II: Activities and services Introduction EXPLAINING OUR GROUP ACTIVITY STATEMENTS Each group activity statement is broken down into the following headings: OVERVIEW Why the council is involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Supported in Ms Kohere's Rebuttal Evidence?
    Additional SSMW sought Supported subsequently by Ms Kohere (and evidence Supported in Ms Kohere's primary Supported in Ms Kohere's rebuttal recommendation is based Ms Kohere's final Number Name Submission evidence? evidence? on)? recommendation Now supported as SSMW based on HNZ's submission, Ngati Paoa's oral evidence at the hearing and indications they support HNZ's submission. New Zealand Historic Places Trust Add Te Routu o Ureia, at Erin Point (Register Extent to reflect HNZ's 371-111 (Heritage New Zealand) Pouhere Taonga #7773) to the schedule. No No as not supported by Mana Whenua submission. New SSMW New Zealand Historic Places Trust Add Tauwhare, Rewiti (Register #7361) to the 371-112 (Heritage New Zealand) Pouhere Taonga schedule. PAUP notified SSMW SSMW 046 Mana Whenua may still indicate support for HNZ's submission, currently confirming with Te New Zealand Historic Places Trust Add Kopironui, Rewiti (Register #7174 and Runanga o Ngati Whatua ki 371-113 (Heritage New Zealand) Pouhere Taonga #7481) to the schedule. No No as not supported by Mana Whenua Kaipara. TBC Now supported as SSMW based on HNZ's submission, Ngati Paoa's oral evidence at the hearing and indications they support HNZ's submission. New Zealand Historic Places Trust Add Ngāti Paoa Urupa, at Mount Wellington Extent to reflect HNZ's 371-114 (Heritage New Zealand) Pouhere Taonga (Register #7220) to the schedule. No No as not supported by Mana Whenua submission. New SSMW Now supported as SSMW based on HNZ's submission, Ngati Paoa's oral evidence at the hearing and indications they Ms Kohere supported adding this as a SVMW support HNZ's submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2 Local Board Information and Agreements
    2011 June 22 ADOPTION- FOR DRAFT LOCAL BOARD INFORMATION AND AGREEMENTS VOLUME 2 HOW THIS PLAN IS ARRANGED Auckland Council’s annual plan 2011/2012 comes in three volumes. Volume 1 of the plan contains the council’s plan for the region. Volume 3 contains changes to licensing and consents fees and charges. This Volume 2 contains the following for each of the 21 local boards: Overview of local board responsibilities and budgets Information about the local board The local board agreement covering the specific area, including aspects for negotiation that were carried out with the governing body The local board’s contact details Volume 1 sets out an overview of key information across the region, including summary information on changes to the long term plan, information on activities and council-controlled organisations, and the Auckland Council’s prospective financial statements. Note that Volume 1 also includes information on the activities each local board is responsible for, and summary information on funding provided to all local boards. You should read this volume in conjunction with Volume 1. Volume 3 includes a list of the changes to existing licensing and consent charges such as building control, resource consents and other licensing and compliance fees and charges. Amendments to the long-term plan In addition to the annual plan, there is also a separate document called Amendments to Auckland Council’s Long-term Plan 2010-2019. This contains full details of the new policies and amendments to existing policies that represent significant changes to those set out in the Long-term Plan 2010-2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Methods for Estimating Tephra Source and Dispersal
    STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TEPHRA SOURCE AND DISPERSAL A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Statistics at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Emily Kawabata 2016 Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Abstract Tephra refers to any pyroclastic fragments ejected from a volcanic vent and its dispersal is one of the major hazards with explosive eruptions. The attenuation of tephra fall thickness is most commonly estimated after contouring field measurements into smooth isopachs. I explicitly describe the variability in thickness by using a semiempirical tephra attenuation relation as a link function. This opens the way to fitting models to actual tephra observations through maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). The method is illustrated using data published from the 1973 Heimaey eruption in Iceland. Complex eruptions commonly produce several phases of tephra fall from multiple vents. When attempting to precisely reconstruct past eruptions from the geological record alone, separate phases are often indistinguishable. Augmented by a mixture framework, the MLE attenuation model was able to identify the sources and directions of tephra deposition for the 1977 Ukinrek Maars eruption in Alaska, US, from only the tephra thickness data. It was then applied to the unobserved 1256 AD Al-Madinah eruption in Saudi Arabia. The estimation of the spatio-temporal hazard from a monogenetic volcanic field is criti- cally dependent on a reconstruction of past events.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangere Town Centre Historic Heritage Survey
    MANGERE TOWN CENTRE HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY PREPARED FOR AUCKLAND COUNCIL BY MATTHEWS & MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS LTD IN ASSOCIATION WITH CLOUGH & ASSOCIATES LTD JP ADAM RA SKIDMORE URBAN DESIGN LTD NOVEMBER 2013 MANGERE TOWN CENTRE HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Brief 4 1.2 The study area 5 1.3 Methodology and approach 5 1.4 Acknowledgements 5 1.5 Report Structure 7 2.0 SUMMARY OF HISTORIC HERITAGE ISSUES 9 2.1 Built heritage: Overview and recommendations 9 2.2 Urban design: Overview and recommendations 11 2.3 Geology: Overview and recommendations 11 2.4 Archaeology: Overview and recommendations 12 2.5 Landscape history: Overview and recommendations 12 2.6 Māori ancestral relationships and issues: Overview and recommendations 13 APPENDICES 15 APPENDIX 1: HISTORIC THEMATIC OVERVIEW APPENDIX 2: BUILT HISTORIC HERITAGE Appendix 2.1 Currently scheduled historic heritage places Appendix 2.2 Places prioritised for research APPENDIX 3: URBAN DESIGN SUMMARY APPENDIX 4: GEOLOGY APPENDIX 5: ARCHAEOLOGY APPENDIX 6: LANDSCAPE HISTORY APPENDIX 7: MĀORI ANCESTRAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH MĀNGERE- ŌTAHUHU: AN OVERVIEW 3 MANGERE TOWN CENTRE HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 • Investigate the local history, based on 1.0 INTRODUCTION an understanding of key themes in its development. 1.1 Brief • Consider the area holistically and use research, analysis and field surveys to This is a historic heritage survey of the assess archaeological sites; special Māngere town centre. The aim is to provide character and design context; sites of research, analysis and recommendations for: significance to Māori; natural landscape including geology and open space, • historic heritage places and areas parks and gardens.2 • special character • Seek to identify heritage values through • the natural landscape/geology consultation with mana whenua and the • archaeology community3.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Page numbers in italics refer to Figures and page numbers in bold refer to Tables acid gases Canary Islands 209 critical loading 116 Negra Mt study Hekla output 114-115 1706 eruption 210-212 sulphur dioxide 167-169 risk assessments 212-215 acid rain, volcanogenic 34, 41 charcoal 20 Aqores, Furnas volcano study chemistry see geochemistry environmental impacts 198-201 Chinyero 209 eruption history 194-198 Chironomidae 111 socio-economic impacts 203-204 climate change Aegean Arc, Nisyros study 69-71 effect of Hekla 110-111, 114-115, 118- EDS analysis 120 methods 78-79 effect of Laki 112, 113, 161-162 results 79-84 scientific measures 164-165 results discussed 84-86 sulphur dioxide effect 166-169 pumice fall isopachs 77 written accounts 162-165 stratigraphy 71-77 effect of Pinatubo 113 tephrostratigraphy 77-78 effect of Tambora 112, 113-114 aeromagnetic data, Auckland volcanic field Coromandel Volcanic Zone 28 4,5, 8-9 Corylus pollen record 111 aerosols 167 Crater Hill 2, 4-5, 6, 7, 8, 9 see also acid gases critical load concept 116 Akira Pumice Formation 50, 51 Curie temperature 131, 132 albedo, volcanic effect on 167 alkali basalt 3 discriminant function analysis (DFA) 149 Angat Kitet Formation 51, 52 British tephra sites 156-157 anhysteretic remanent magnetization 131 data handling 149-150 archaeological applications of tephra Icelandic tephras 150-153, 154-156 Bronze Age volcanism 110, 119-120 Ash Hill 2, 6 earthquakes see seismicity Auckland volcanic field 24, 29 Egmont, Mt 1 l, 12, 28, 32-33 eruption timing 7-8 Emuruangogolak
    [Show full text]
  • CMS Auckland 2014-2024, Volume I, Operative 17 November 2014
    CMS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AUCKLAND 2014–2024, Volume I Operative 17 November 2014 CMS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AUCKLAND 2014–2024, Volume I Operative 17 November 2014 Cover image: Trampers admire the view from Hirakimatā (Mount Hobson) on the multi-day walk, the Aotea Track, on Great Barrier Island (Aotea Island). Photo: Andris Apse November 2014, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 978-0-478-15027-8 (print) ISBN 978-0-478-15029-2 (online) This document is protected by copyright owned by the Department of Conservation on behalf of the Crown. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items or collections of content, this copyright material is licensed for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. In essence, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the material, as long as you attribute it to the Department of Conservation and abide by the other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/nz This publication is produced using paper sourced from well-managed, renewable and legally logged forests. Contents FOREWORD 5 INTRODUCTION 7 Purpose of conservation management strategies 7 CMS structure 9 CMS term 9 Relationship with other Department of Conservation strategic documents and tools 9 Relationship with other planning processes 10 Legislative tools 11 Exemption from land use consents 11 Closure of areas and access restrictions 11 Bylaws and regulations 11 Conservation management plans 11 International obligations 12 PART ONE 13 1 The Department
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Analogues for Miocene to Pleistocene
    Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. • 2(3) • 2010 • 339-361 DOI: 10.2478/v10085-010-0013-8 Central European Journal of Geosciences Modern analogues for Miocene to Pleistocene alkali basaltic phreatomagmatic fields in the Pannonian Basin: “soft-substrate” to “combined” aquifer controlled phreatomagmatism in intraplate volcanic fields Research Article Károly Németh1∗, Shane J. Cronin1, Miguel J. Haller2, Marco Brenna1, Gábor Csillag3 1 Volcanic Risk Solutions CS-INR, Massey University, PO Box 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2 Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco – Sede Puerto Madryn, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina, 3 Geological Institute of Hungary, Department of Geological Research, Stefánia út 14, Budapest H-1143, Hungary, Received 29 April 2010; accepted 4 June 2010 Abstract: The Pannonian Basin (Central Europe) hosts numerous alkali basaltic volcanic fields in an area similar to 200 000 km2. These volcanic fields were formed in an approximate time span of 8 million years producing small- volume volcanoes typically considered to be monogenetic. Polycyclic monogenetic volcanic complexes are also common in each field however. The original morphology of volcanic landforms, especially phreatomagmatic volcanoes, is commonly modified. by erosion, commonly aided by tectonic uplift. The phreatomagmatic volcanoes eroded to the level of their sub-surface architecture expose crater to conduit filling as well as diatreme facies of pyroclastic rock assemblages. Uncertainties due to the strong erosion influenced by tectonic uplifts, fast and broad climatic changes, vegetation cover variations, and rapidly changing fluvio-lacustrine events in the past 8 million years in the Pannonian Basin have created a need to reconstruct and visualise the paleoenvironment into which the monogenetic volcanoes erupted.
    [Show full text]