DOCSLIB.ORG

Activities and Services of Auckland Council Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Activities and Services of Auckland Council Introduction Part II: Activities and services Introduction PART II ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES OF AUCKLAND COUNCIL INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW Auckland Council provides a range of goods and services. These are detailed in the following sections where the activities undertaken by the council and its CCOs are described. Each section includes details of the expenditure, the projects and achievements together with the levels of service which were provided and details of the performance measures. The performance measures describe either what we set out to achieve or levels of customer satisfaction. Results show performance against the standard (target) we set ourselves. The sections provide information about: • the groups of activities undertaken by Auckland Council. Activities are grouped together because of their connectivity with each other • individual activities undertaken. Individual activities are goods and services delivered to the community – for example, the provision of facilities, providing grants and the performance of regulatory and other functions. Note that some activities are provided by the CCOs. While each set of performance measures, results and commentaries cover the full activity provided by the council and Group, only the portions funded directly by the council are covered in the financial statements. A summary of the total expenditure of the CCOs is covered in the CCO section. Following the sections about the council’s activities, there is coverage of the activities of the 21 local boards, and this is followed by the CCO section. The council has 11 groups of activities: • Community • Lifestyle and Culture • Economic Development • Planning and Regulation • Environmental Management • Solid Waste • Water Supply and Wastewater • Stormwater • Transport • Commercial and Investment • Governance Auckland Council Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 52 Part II: Activities and services Introduction EXPLAINING OUR GROUP ACTIVITY STATEMENTS Each group activity statement is broken down into the following headings: OVERVIEW Why the council is involved. THE ACTIVITIES The activities that make up the group (for example Libraries, Community Services, Emergency Management and Cemeteries and Crematoria are the four activities included in the Community group). We use these symbols to show how the activities align with the Mayor’s vision: A productive, high-value economy Cohesive, strong communities Quality urban, rural and natural An excellent transport system environments S TRATEGIC ALIGNMENT How each activity contributes to the council’s strategies. FINANCIAL INFORMATION The operating expenditure and capital investment for the group of activities. The capital expenditure figures include expenditure for projects that the council planned to carry out itself plus what it funded for projects carried out by CCOs. The financial information is presented in dollars thousands. This differs from the financial statements in part three that are in dollars millions. EXPLAINING INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITY STATEMENTS Each individual activity has its own overview, followed by the following sub-sections: THE SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THIS ACTIVITY The regional and local services provided under each activity are listed. Where there are local services, examples are also included. BENEFITS A statement about the benefits to the community of each service. Auckland Council Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 53 Part II: Activities and services Introduction MEASURING PERFORMANCE The tables illustrate our service delivery performance for the year. • A statement describes the service we perform – for example: Providing safe, welcoming and accessible library facilities for customers to access library services. • One or more measures are used to determine how well we have performed – for example: Average number of library visits per capita. • While measures link to a level of service, in some instances - for example measures of customer satisfaction - they may be indicative of the broader activity. • The column headed “Indicator” provides a quick visual check of how we performed in the delivery of a service during the year. • The next column gives the 2012 performance result. • The target is the overall or average result we set ourselves to achieve across the region. Actual performance in different parts of the region may be dependent on the extent to which the service was provided in previous local authority areas. • The final column provides the overall or average result achieved across the region in 2011, usually for the eight month period from 1 November 2010 - 30 June 2011, unless otherwise indicated. Beneath the tables are commentaries about how the result was achieved as well as about the actions that the council plans to maintain or improve the result for the 2012/2013 year. How levels of service and performance measures have developed since the establishment of Auckland Council Following transition to a single Auckland Council, levels of service and performance measures were developed by consolidating information from the long-term and annual plans of the previous eight local authorities in the region, with adjustments to reflect the new governance arrangements. In general, consolidation focused on identifying common themes where possible and taking account of our ability to measure and report on the measures for the greater Auckland area. For some activities (for example in the commercial and investment fields) which do not equate with those undertaken by the legacy councils, new levels of service, performance measures and targets have been introduced. The amalgamation of eight councils into Auckland Council and six substantive CCOs presented many challenges - none more so than setting new levels of services and obtaining consistent reliable performance data from disparate legacy systems. In general, the targets that were set reflected the best performance of the legacy councils. The measurement and recording systems used by the legacy councils differed markedly. Prior to amalgamation on 1 November 2010, we were unable to standardise these systems. Reporting performance for the period 1 November 2010 – 30 June 2011 therefore required extracting diverse data from unrelated systems. The resulting consolidated performance results may not have been truly reflective of actual performance, but were best attempts at presenting performance data. During 2011/2012 we worked hard to develop consistent council-wide performance measures, including as part of the work undertaken to develop the Long Term Plan for which the council’s performance measuring regime was further refined. In some of the cases in this annual report where results appear to be below the previous level, the cause may well be because we are using more accurate measurement systems than previously. Auckland Council Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 54 Part II: Activities and services Introduction EXPLAINING OUR PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ANNUAL REP ORT AND THE AUCKLAND PLAN Because the Auckland Plan was finalised and adopted during the reporting period for this annual report, the outcome indicators and performance measures that we include pre-date the Plan. Future Annual Reports will include outcome indicators and performance measures aligned to the outcomes, principles and transformational shifts of the Auckland Plan. Although the outcome indicators and performance measures used in this Annual Report pre-date the Plan, nevertheless they broadly support it. To illustrate this, the symbols illustrated on page xx show how the council’s activities, projects and priorities are aligned to the transformational shifts outlined in the Auckland Plan. A QUICK VISUAL CHECK Our performance indicators are designed to give a quick visual check about progress being made towards achieving the objectives of providing a particular service, as well as about progress being made in meeting the goals of the Unitary Plan. The status of the indicators is derived from the performance results and whether or not they are improving. OVERALL RESULTS FOR ALL COUNCIL ACTIVITIES Across all the council’s activities, we achieved the following results: - Achieving: Satisfactory: Progressing: Improvement: No result Needed Meeting or Within 2% of target, Target not achieved, exceeding target but improvement Target not achieved; over last year no improvement over last year 168 21 27 20 15 Refer to individual activities sections to see the performance indicators for each activity. ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROJECTS 1 JULY 2011 TO 31 JUNE 2012 The key achievements and projects for each activity for the period 1 July 2011 to 31 June 2012 are listed. A number of specific achievements are highlighted by means of short feature stories. Auckland Council Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 55 Part II: Activities and services Introduction LOCAL BOARD ACTIVITIES Auckland Council has a unique governance structure, with 21 local boards which have decision-making responsibilities . A description of the decision-making responsibilities of the local boards is included in the local boards section at page xxx, following the activity sections. Information is provided on how this complements the decision- making responsibilities of the governing body. The levels of service, performance measures, achievements and projects delivered by each local board are described. ACTIVITIES OF COUNCIL-CONTROLLED ORGANISATIONS (CCOS) AND WATERCARE SERVICES LTD We provide a summary of those activities performed by the CCOs and Watercare Services Ltd that are funded directly by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review Landscape Report
    HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW LANDSCAPE REPORT September 2006 1 Prepared by Hudson Associates Landscape Architects for Auckland City Council as part of the Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review September 2006 Hudson Associates Landscape Architects PO Box 8823 06 877-9808 Havelock North Hawke’s Bay [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 Landscape Character 10 Strategic Management Areas 13 Land Units 16 Rakino 31 Rotoroa 33 Ridgelines 35 Outstanding Natural Landscapes 38 Settlement Areas 40 Assessment Criteria 45 Appendix 48 References 51 3 LIST OF FIGURE Figure # Description Page 1. Oneroa 1920’s. photograph 6 2. Oneroa 1950’s photograph 6 3 Great Barrier Island. Medlands Settlement Area 7 4 Colour for Buildings 8 5 Waiheke View Report 9 6 Western Waiheke aerials over 20 years 11 7 Great Barrier Island. Natural landscape 11 8 Karamuramu Island 11 9 Rotoroa Island 12 10 Rakino Island 12 11 Strategic Management Areas 14 12 Planning layers 15 13 Waiheke Land Units 17 14 Great Barrier Island Land Units 18 15 Land Unit 4 Wetlands 19 16 Land Unit 2 Dunes and Sand Flats 19 17 Land Unit 1 Coastal Cliffs and Slopes 20 18 Land Unit 8 Regenerating Slopes 20 19 Growth on Land Unit 8 1988 21 20 Growth on Land Unit 8, 2004 21 21 LU 12 Bush Residential 22 22 Land Unit 20 Onetangi Straight over 18 years 23 23 Kennedy Point 26 24 Cory Road Land Unit 20 27 25 Aerial of Tiri Road 28 26 Land Unit 22 Western Waiheke 29 27 Thompsons Point 30 28 Rakino Island 32 29 Rotoroa Island 34 30 Matiatia, house on ridge 36 31 Ridge east of Erua Rd 36 32 House on secondary ridge above Gordons Rd 37 4 INTRODUCTION 5 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared to document some of the landscape contribution made in the preparation of the Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Article
    NOTORNIS Journal of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand Volume 23 Part 4 December 1976 OFFICERS 1976 - 77 k- President - Mr. B. D. BELL, Wildlife Service, Dept. of Internal Affairs, Private Bag, Wellington Vice-president - Mrs J. B. HAMEL, 42 Ann Street, Rqslyn, Dunedin Dunedin Editor - Mr. E. W. DAWSON, P.O. Box 41-002,Eastbourne Treasurer - Mr. H. W. M. HOGG, P.O. Box 3011, Dunedin Secretary - Mr. P. D. GAZE, P.O. Box 30466, Lower Hutt Council Members: Dr. BEN D. BELL, 45 Gurney Road, Belmont, Lower Hutt Dr. P. C. BULL, 131 Waterloo Road, Lower Hutt Mr. M. L. FALCONER, 188 Miromiro Road, Normandale, Lower Hutt Mr. F. C. KINSKY, C/- National Museum, Private Bag, Wellington Mr. D. V. MERTON, Wildlife Service, Dept. of Internal Affairs, Private Bag, Wellington Mrs. S. M. REED, 4 Mamaku Street, Auckland 5 Mr. R. R. SUTTON, Lorneville, No. 4 R.D., Invercargill Auckland 10 Conveners and Organisers: Rare Birds Committee: Mr. F. C. KINSKY, C/- National Museum, Private Bag, Wellington Beach Patrol: Mr. C. R. VEITCH, Wildlife Service, Dept. of Internal Affairs, P.O. Box 2220, Auckland Card Committee: R. N. THOMAS, 25 Ravenswood Drive, Forest Hill, Auckland 10 Field Investigation Committee: Mr. B. D. BELL Librarian: Miss A. J. GOODWIN, R.D. 1, Clevedon Nest Records: Mr. D. E. CROCKETT, 21 McMillan Ave., Kamo, Whangarei Recording (including material for Classified Summarised Notes) : Mr. A. T. EDGAR, Inlet Road, Kerikeri Representative on Member Bodies' Committee of Royal Society of N.Z.: Mr. B. D. BELL SUBSCRIPTIONS AND MEMBERSHIP Annual Subscription: Ordinary .membership $6; HusbandIWife member- ship $9; Life membership $120 (age over 30); Junior member- ship (age under 20) $4.50; Family membership (one Nofornis per household) other members of a family living in one house- hold where one is already a member $3; Institutional subscrip- tions $10; overseas subscriptions $1.50 extra.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Councillors
    Ward councillors Albany Ward - confirmed Candidate Affiliation Candidate no Votes received Rank WATSON, John Putting People First 225 19,324 1 WALKER, Wayne Putting People First 224 17,938 2 WHYTE, Lisa Auckland Future 226 15,926 LOWE, Graham Auckland Future 223 15,549 BENSCH, John Independent 221 5,126 HENETI, Alezix 222 1,538 INFORMAL 227 74 BLANK 228 3,852 Albert-Eden-Roskill Ward - confirmed Candidate Affiliation Candidate no Votes received Rank CASEY, Cathy City Vision 321 19,256 1 FLETCHER, Christine C&R - Communities & Residents 322 16,925 2 HARRIS, Rob Auckland Future 323 10,000 HAYNES, Peter City Vision 324 9,935 LEE, Benjamin C&R - Communities & Residents 325 9,070 MCKEOWN, Greg Independent 326 8,472 SOKRATOV, Boris Independent 327 2,879 SULLIVAN-TAYLOR, Bridgette 328 1,177 INFORMAL 329 78 BLANK 330 3,867 Franklin Ward - confirmed Bill Cashmore was elected unopposed. Howick Ward - confirmed Candidate Affiliation Candidate no Votes received Rank STEWART, Sharon Independent 388 17,923 1 QUAX, Dick Independent 387 15,516 2 YOUNG, Paul Independent 389 7,046 HAY, David Independent 382 5,757 ZHU, Julie Green Party 390 5,732 CROSS, Matthew 381 5,034 MONTGOMERY, Olivia 386 4,409 KUMAR, Gyanandra Labour 384 3,129 MAMEDOV, Tofik Labour 385 2,743 IRELAND, Ian Colin 383 1,120 INFORMAL 391 164 BLANK 392 1,878 Manukau Ward - confirmed Candidate Affiliation Candidate no Votes received Rank FILIPAINA, Alf Labour 403 17,327 1 COLLINS, Fa'anana Efeso Labour 401 16,500 2 CORBETT, Brendan Respect Our Community Campaign 402 7,738 MUA, Sooalo Setu
    [Show full text]
  • Parks Recreation and Heritage Forum Agenda
    I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Parks Recreation and Heritage Forum will be held on: Date: Tuesday, 14 August 2012 Time: 1.00pm Meeting Room: Reception Lounge Venue: Auckland Town Hall 301-305 Queen Street Auckland Parks Recreation and Heritage Forum OPEN AGENDA MEMBERSHIP Chairperson Cr Sandra Coney, QSO Deputy Chairperson Cr Wayne Walker Members Mr James Brown Cr Alf Filipaina Cr Hon Chris Fletcher Cr Michael Goudie Cr Ann Hartley, JP Cr Mike Lee Ms Anahera Morehu Cr Dick Quax Cr Noelene Raffills, JP Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBE Cr Penny Webster Ex Officio Mayor, Len Brown, JP Deputy Mayor, Penny Hulse Ex Officio (without All other Councillors voting rights) Independent Maori Chairperson, Independent Maori Statutory Board, Mr David Taipari Statutory Board Alternate (Quorum 6 members) Elaine Stephenson Committee Secretary 9 August 2012 Contact Telephone: (09) 373 6328 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Parks Recreation and Heritage Forum 14 August 2012 ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Apologies 5 2 Declaration of Interest 5 3 Confirmation of Minutes 5 4 Petitions 5 5 Public Input 5 5.1 Auckland Library Heritage Trust 5 5.2 Friends of Mangawhau 5 5.3 Weed Management Advisory 6 6 Local Board Input 6 6.1 Waitakere Ranges Local Board 6 7 Extraordinary Business 6 8 Notices of Motion 7 9 Auckland Libraries Regional Heritage Collections 9 10 Update on the development of Auckland Council’s weed management policy 19 11 Local Board engagement in decision making allocation for
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Libraries RDA Monograph Standard
    Auckland Libraries Cataloguing policy for monographs The following document contains the minimum requirements for cataloguing using RDA instructions. For full instructions refer to the RDA Toolkit. Auckland Libraries policy on the use of RDA for monograph records is as follows: For Original Cataloguing • Catalogue the title in hand as to what the material is, not the collection the material is being allocated to, e.g. children’s fiction being allocated to a nonfiction collection should have children’s fiction subject headings only. • Use the current Auckland Libraries RDA policy for monographs. For Copy Cataloguing RDA • Catalogue the title in hand as to what the material is, not the collection the material is being allocated to, e.g. children’s fiction being allocated to a nonfiction collection should have children’s fiction subject headings only. • If an RDA record is available, use it and make revisions based on RDA instructions, LC practice, and local coding practices. • If only an AACR2 record is available upgrade record to RDA using the current Auckland Libraries RDA policy for monographs. • If only a hybrid AACR2/RDA record is available upgrade record to RDA using the current Auckland Libraries RDA policy for monographs General Information about RDA and RDA Coding Practices RDA Content -- The content of RDA introduces new concepts with a new organizational scheme that is closely aligned with the entity-attribute-relationship conceptual models of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD). RDA does not prescribe any standard for display purposes, but for now most libraries will continue to use MARC and International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD).
    [Show full text]
  • 404 – February 2021
    Photos: summer foliage & colours CLEVEDON ROUNDUP YOUR COMMUNITY INFORMATION NEWSPAPER No. 404 – FEBRUARY 2021 See page.6 See page 5 Page Index Club News 3 Presbyterian Church 10 Valley Music Foundation 4 Local Snippets 13 South Auckland Choral 4 Clevedon Cares 13 Clevedon CBA update 5 Clevedon Lions 14 Franklin Local Board 6 MP’s report 14 Friends of Te Wairoa 8 Advert rates, deadlines 17 Market Place 8 Community Notices 18 Anglican Church 9 Local trades & businesses 7, 11, 12, 15, 16 . Ed. 404 – Clevedon Roundup – February 2021 1 LOCAL TRADE & BUSINESS (paid advertisements) Ed. 404 – Clevedon Roundup – February 2021 2 Information supplied directly by the nominated clubs CLUB NEWS FIRESIDE BRIDGE CLUB CLEVEDON The club meets every Wednesday from 10.00 to about 2.30 at All Souls Church Hall Clevedon, for friendly duplicate bridge, with usually 7 or more tables. BYO Lunch. For information, please contact - Pauline 2997433 or 0276105457 CLEVEDON TENNIS CLUB MEMBERS NEWS CLEVEDON TENNIS CLUB - SOME VERY IMPORTANT DATES....................... *** Cardio tennis starting Wednesday 3rd Feb. Contact Matt to sign up *** Thursday Business House start 4th February at 6.45pm *** Monday Business House start 15 February at 6.45pm *** Junior and Senior Coaching - Contact Matt cell ph 022 081 9620 Coach: http://www.mattjonestennis.co.nz Club: http://www.clevedontennisclub.co.nz CLEVEDON PONY CLUB The fantastic annual Clevedon Pony Club One Day Event is just around the corner! The event will be holding classes from 65cm through to 105cm and will take place on Saturday 27th February at the Clevedon Showgrounds. This event is once again generously sponsored by Archibald & Shorter, alongside Ardmore Nurseries, Pure NZ, Zealandia, Rockin Horse, Equissage, Veterinary Associates Equine, Equisport NZ and The Village Saddlery.Entries to compete at this picturesque event will close on the 21st February, or when classes are full.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009
    Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices A - J February TR 2009/009 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No. 009 February 2009 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-16-3 Contents Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of Relevant Tonkin & Taylor Jobs Appendix D: Summary of Shoreline Characterization Appendix E: Field Investigation Data Appendix F: Summary of Regional Beach Properties Appendix G: Summary of Regional Cliff Properties Appendix H: Description of Physical Setting Appendix I: Heli-Survey DVDs (Contact ARC Librarian) Appendix J: Analysis of Beach Profile Changes Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion, Volume 2: Appendices A-J Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of relevant Tonkin & Taylor jobs Job Number North East Year of Weathered Depth is Weathered Typical Cliff Cliff Slope Cliff Slope Composite Composite Final Slope Geology Rec Setback erosion rate Comments Street address Suburb investigation layer depth Estimated/ layer Slope weathered layer Height (deg) (rads) slope from slope from (degree) from Crest (m) (m/yr) (m) Greater than (deg) slope (rad) (m) calc (degree) profile (deg) 6 RIVERVIEW PANMURE 12531.000 2676066 6475685 1994 2.40 58 0.454 12.0 51.5 0.899 43.70 35 35 avt 6 ROAD 15590.000 6472865 2675315 2001 2.40 0.454 4.0 30.0 0.524 27.48 27 avt 8 29 MATAROA RD OTAHUHU 16619.000 6475823 2675659 1999 2.40 0.454 6.0 50.0 0.873 37.07 37 avt LAGOON DRIVE PANMURE long term recession ~ FIDELIS AVENUE 5890.000 2665773 6529758 1983 0.75 G 0.454 0.000 N.D Kk 15 - 20 0.050 50mm/yr 80m setback from toe FIDELIS AVE ALGIES BAY recc.
    [Show full text]
  • TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach
    Warkworth Makarau Waiwera Puhoi TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach Wainui EPSOM .............. $1,791,000 HILLSBOROUGH ....... $1,100,000 WATTLE DOWNS ......... $856,750 Orewa PONSONBY ........... $1,775,000 ONE TREE HILL ...... $1,100,000 WARKWORTH ............ $852,500 REMUERA ............ $1,730,000 BLOCKHOUSE BAY ..... $1,097,250 BAYVIEW .............. $850,000 Kaukapakapa GLENDOWIE .......... $1,700,000 GLEN INNES ......... $1,082,500 TE ATATŪ SOUTH ....... $850,000 WESTMERE ........... $1,700,000 EAST TĀMAKI ........ $1,080,000 UNSWORTH HEIGHTS ..... $850,000 Red Beach Army Bay PINEHILL ........... $1,694,000 LYNFIELD ........... $1,050,000 TITIRANGI ............ $843,000 KOHIMARAMA ......... $1,645,500 OREWA .............. $1,050,000 MOUNT WELLINGTON ..... $830,000 Tindalls Silverdale Beach SAINT HELIERS ...... $1,640,000 BIRKENHEAD ......... $1,045,500 HENDERSON ............ $828,000 Gulf Harbour DEVONPORT .......... $1,575,000 WAINUI ............. $1,030,000 BIRKDALE ............. $823,694 Matakatia GREY LYNN .......... $1,492,000 MOUNT ROSKILL ...... $1,015,000 STANMORE BAY ......... $817,500 Stanmore Bay MISSION BAY ........ $1,455,000 PAKURANGA .......... $1,010,000 PAPATOETOE ........... $815,000 Manly SCHNAPPER ROCK ..... $1,453,100 TORBAY ............. $1,001,000 MASSEY ............... $795,000 Waitoki Wade HAURAKI ............ $1,450,000 BOTANY DOWNS ....... $1,000,000 CONIFER GROVE ........ $783,500 Stillwater Heads Arkles MAIRANGI BAY ....... $1,450,000 KARAKA ............. $1,000,000 ALBANY ............... $782,000 Bay POINT CHEVALIER .... $1,450,000 OTEHA .............. $1,000,000 GLENDENE ............. $780,000 GREENLANE .......... $1,429,000 ONEHUNGA ............. $999,000 NEW LYNN ............. $780,000 Okura Bush GREENHITHE ......... $1,425,000 PAKURANGA HEIGHTS .... $985,350 TAKANINI ............. $780,000 SANDRINGHAM ........ $1,385,000 HELENSVILLE .......... $985,000 GULF HARBOUR ......... $778,000 TAKAPUNA ........... $1,356,000 SUNNYNOOK ............ $978,000 MĀNGERE .............
    [Show full text]
  • South & East Auckland
    G A p R D D Paremoremo O N R Sunnynook Course EM Y P R 18 U ParemoremoA O H N R D E M Schnapper Rock W S Y W R D O L R SUNSET RD E R L ABERDEEN T I A Castor Bay H H TARGE SUNNYNOOK S Unsworth T T T S Forrest C Heights E O South & East Auckland R G Hill R L Totara Vale R D E A D R 1 R N AIRA O S Matapihi Point F W F U I T Motutapu E U R RD Stony Batter D L Milford Waitemata THE R B O D Island Thompsons Point Historic HI D EN AR KITCHENER RD Waihihi Harbour RE H Hakaimango Point Reserve G Greenhithe R R TRISTRAM Bayview D Kauri Point TAUHINU E Wairau P Korakorahi Point P DIANA DR Valley U IPATIKI CHIVALRY RD HILLSIDERD 1 A R CHARTWELL NZAF Herald K D Lake Takapuna SUNNYBRAE RD SHAKESPEARE RD ase RNZAF T Pupuke t Island 18 Glenfield AVE Takapuna A Auckland nle H Takapuna OCEAN VIEW RD kland a I Golf Course A hi R Beach Golf Course ro O ia PT T a E O Holiday Palm Beach L R HURSTMERE RD W IL D Park D V BEACH HAVEN RD NORTHCOTE R BAY RD R N Beach ARCHERS RD Rangitoto B S P I O B E K A S D A O D Island Haven I R R B R A I R K O L N U R CORONATION RD O E Blackpool H E Hillcrest R D A A K R T N Church Bay Y O B A SM K N D E N R S Birkdale I R G Surfdale MAN O’WA Hobsonville G A D R North Shore A D L K A D E Rangitawhiri Point D E Holiday Park LAK T R R N OCEANRALEIGH VIEW RD I R H E A R E PUPUKE Northcote Hauraki A 18 Y D EXMOUTH RD 2 E Scott Pt D RD L R JUTLAND RD E D A E ORAPIU RD RD S Birkenhead V I W K D E A Belmont W A R R K ONEWA L HaurakiMotorway .
    [Show full text]
  • How a Family Tradition Endures
    SOCIETY SOCIETY Left, Min Jin Lee, in blue, and her sisters celebrate the New Year in Seoul, 1976; below, Ms. Lee’s parents, Mi Hwa Lee (left) and Boo Choon Lee, do likewise in New Jersey, 2005. MY KOREAN NEW YEAR How a family tradition endures By Min Jin Lee y finest hour as a Korean took According to Seollal tradition, a Korean has Upon the completion of a bow, we’d receive an practice of observing Jan. 1 as New Year’s Day, place on a Seollal morning, the to eat a bowl of the bone-white soup filled with elder’s blessing and money. A neighborhood when it’s called Shinjeong. Some Koreans still first day of Korean New Year’s, in coin-shaped slices of chewy rice cake in order to bowing tour to honor the elders could yield a do. Consequently the country now observes January 1976. age a year—a ritual far more appreciated early handsome purse. two different national holidays as New Year’s— I was 7 years old, and my in life. The garnishes vary by household; my My cousins and my older sister Myung Jin one on Jan. 1 and the other according to the Mfamily still lived in Seoul, where my two sisters family topped our soup with seasoned finished in a jiffy and collected their rewards. moon. When we moved to the U.S., Jan. 1 and I had been born. Seollal, the New Year’s Day shredded beef, toasted laver (thin sheets of Uncle and Aunt waited for me to bow.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Or Lunar New Year
    Teaching About Lunar New Year Dr. Margaret Hill Chinese New Year, or Spring Festival, falls on the first day of the first month of the new lunisolar calendar each year. The Lantern Festival that falls on the fifteenth day brings an end to the New Year season, though for China and other Asian countries, Spring Festival is a week-long holiday. Across Asian cultures that use the lunisolar calendar, it may be referred to simply as Lunar New Year. In Korean culture, for example, the holiday is called Seollal or simply Korean New Year and falls on the same date as Chinese New Year, and likewise with the Vietnamese Tet holiday, or Vietnamese New Year. (Since 1873, Japan has followed the same Gregorian calendar followed by the United States, and Japanese New Year, or Oshogatsu, falls on January 1 each year.) Lunar New Year Dates The lunisolar calendar is based on astronomical observations of Chinese Zodiac Year Date the sun's longitude and the moon's phases. Though shrouded in Animal Sign history, some scholars believe that the Chinese emperor Huangdi 2019 February 5 Pig introduced the calendar somewhere between 2500 to 3000 BCE. 2020 January 25 Rat 2021 February 12 Ox Other Asian cultures have used the lunisolar calendar nearly as long as in China. The calendar is used to determine festivals, so the dates of these festivals vary each year. At home, many Chinese Americans celebrate by burning incense, doing special prayers, and making offerings to ancestors and traditional gods. The celebrations of Chinese New Year are diverse, reflecting various ethnic customs and the combined influences of Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism, and Chinese folk religions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Housing We'd Choose" Survey
    The Housing We’d Choose A Study of Housing Preferences, Choices and Trade-Offs in Auckland Prepared for Auckland Council Date: May 2015 Status: Final Date: February 2015 The Housing We’d Choose A Study of Housing Preferences, Choices and Trade-Offs in Auckland A report prepared for the Research and Evaluation Unit (RIMU), Auckland Council Document reference: ACL055.014 Date of this version: May 2015 Report authors: Rodney Yeoman, Greg Akehurst Auckland Council Technical Report 2015/016 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-0-908320-13-4 (Print) ISBN 978-0-908320-14-1 (PDF) Recommended citation Yeoman, R and Akehurst, G (2015). The housing we’d choose: a study of housing preferences, choices and trade- offs in Auckland. Auckland Council technical report, TR2015/016. Prepared by Market Economics Limited for Auckland Council. Auckland: Market Economics Limited Auckland Council Peer Review Panel This report has been peer reviewed by Auckland Council’s Peer Review Panel Approved for publication by: Regan Solomon, Manager, Research and Evaluation Unit Disclaimer Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and reliability of the information contained in this report, neither Market Economics Limited nor any of its employees shall be held liable for the information, opinions and forecasts expressed in this report. Market Economics Limited Level 5, 507 Lake Road PO Box 331 297, Takapuna www.me.co.nz Auckland 0740, NZ P 09 915 5510 Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]