DOCSLIB.ORG

Otahuhu Historic Heritage Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY Overview Report PREPARED FOR AUCKLAND COUNCIL BY MATTHEWS & MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS LTD IN ASSOCIATION WITH LYN WILLIAMS LISA TRUTTMAN BRUCE W HAYWARD CLOUGH & ASSOCIATES LTD JP ADAM RA SKIDMORE URBAN DESIGN LTD FINAL August 2014 OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Brief .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 The Study area ................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Methodology and Approach .............................................................................. 5 1.4 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................... 5 1.5 Overview of report structure and component parts ........................................... 7 2.0 ŌTĀHUHU STUDY AREA-SUMMARY OF HISTORIC HERITAGE ISSUES ....... 9 2.1 Built Heritage Overview and recommendations ................................................ 9 2.2 Overview and recommendations in relation to geology .................................. 12 2.3 Overview and recommendations in relation to archaeology ........................... 13 2.4 Overview and recommendations Landscape History ...................................... 13 2.5 Overview and recommendations related to Maori Ancestral Relationships and issues identified. ................................................................................................... 15 Appendices Appendix 1: Historic thematic overview Appendix 2: Built historic heritage Appendix 3: Geology report Appendix 4: Archaeology report Appendix 5: Landscape report Appendix 6: Māori ancestral relationships with Māngere-Otahuhu FINAL REV. 5, AUG 2014 3 OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 1.0 INTRODUCTION Investigate the local history of the area based on an understanding of key themes important in the development of the area. 1.1 Brief Consider the area holistically including assessment of; historic heritage places The purpose of this study is to undertake a and areas; archaeological sites; special Historic Heritage Survey of the Ōtāhuhu study character and design context; sites of area. The aim of the study is to provide significance to Māori; natural landscape research, analysis and recommendations for including geology and open space, parks historic heritage places and areas; special and gardens, based on research, analysis character; the natural landscape/geology; and field survey.2 archaeology, landscapes of heritage interest; Seek to identify the heritage values and, Maori heritage. associated with a place through consultation with mana whenua, local The findings from the work will be used to people and the community3; inform three pieces of work being carried out Provide an evidence base to inform by Auckland Council which are: relevant Auckland Council plans, policies and decisions. This includes assessing The Auckland Council Interim Guidance on the historic heritage significance of places Historic Heritage Surveys, which will provide and areas, making use of the evaluation the ‘template’ for future surveys across criteria set out in the Unitary Plan for Auckland; scheduling significant Historic Heritage Places and Special Character Areas; and, The preparation of the Auckland Council Include recommendations that will Unitary Plan, which will include objectives and positively influence a wide range of local policies that will shape the future of this area, a ‘place shaping’ activities. This includes schedule of significant Historic Heritage Places regulatory and non-regulatory tools. and Special Character Areas; and, 2 Provide high quality and detailed The Auckland Council Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Area feedback on the draft HHS Interim Guidance, Plan, which shows how the area could change including: over the next 30 years and help deliver the Strengths; Auckland Plan. Weaknesses; and, Recommended changes to the text or The scope of this study is to: illustrations. 1. Undertake a Historic Heritage Survey 3 Assist Auckland Council consultation of Ōtāhuhu, to improve understanding of with the local board, mana whenua, and the historic heritage in the area and make community, to raise awareness and encourage recommendations for its future management. collaborative working. Including: This should meet the requirements set out in the HHS Interim Guidance for a Detailed (level Engagement with the local board, mana 3) HHS1. This includes the following: whenua, and the community, to identify opportunities for collaborative working; and, Recommended education and outreach products (e.g. local history leaflet, 1 Level 3 HHSs require systematic documentary research, heritage trail, interpretation panels, including primary research and assessment of individual workshops, online resources etc). places. Fieldwork is carried out on foot, based on external observation of the whole area and supplemented by more detailed inspection of potentially significant places. Level 3 HHSs are most suitable for areas that have a complex development history or where assessment of individual places is required. As a minimum, Level 3 HHSs assess 2 The identification and evaluation of individual trees for the historic heritage significance of places and areas, potential scheduling was outside the scope of the study, making use of the evaluation criteria set out in the Unitary however trees noted during field work to be noted. Plan for scheduling. This is to provide the evidence base 3 Maori history and sites of significance were investigated for inclusion in the Unitary Plan. in tandem with this report. FINAL REV. 5, AUG 2014 4 OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Stage 1: Broad research, preliminary field survey work and information gathering to: 1.2 The Study area understand the historic development of The area defined in the study brief the area as a whole and understand approximates that of the former Borough of individual places or areas in context Ōtāhuhu but extends to include the land west of the Main Trunk Line to the Manukau shore, enable preparation of a written thematic Mt Richmond, and some of Māngere East. The historic overview, with supporting historic historic overview has considered an area of maps and photos, summarise places interest around the study area, where relevant, already identified as being of historic to capture significant industries or facilities that heritage value impacted on the history of Ōtāhuhu. (Refer study area map, Figure 1). make a preliminary identification of places or areas that may potentially be of historic heritage value that may warrant further 1.3 Methodology and Approach investigation. Stage 2: More detailed research and field The Historic Heritage Survey methodology survey work to: involves a broad skills set and the work has Prepare a developed study list of places been undertaken by an interdisciplinary team, and/ or areas that warrant further including: investigation Project management: Matthews & Matthews Architects Ltd Stage 3: Detailed research, analysis and assessment of places/ areas with Built heritage: recommendations for statutory management Matthews & Matthews Architects Ltd, where appropriate. Dr Ann McEwan The process is interactive; more detailed Historians and researchers: Lyn Williams, Lisa research may lead to priorities for ongoing Truttman work being adjusted. Constraints on timeframe for the work also restrict the numbers of places Archaeology: Clough & Associates that can be assessed in detail. Māori ancestral relationships: Graeme Murdoch in consultation with Mana Whenua 1.4 Acknowledgements Natural heritage, geology: Bruce Hayward The assistance of the following people and organisations during the preparation of this Landscape history: John P Adam study is gratefully acknowledged: Urban design analysis: RA Skidmore Urban The Ōtāhuhu Historical Society, including Design Ltd Bruce and Wilma Madgwick, Ray Goodger, Allan McGuinn, Mary Crighton and Elaine The Historic Heritage Survey process has Read. The Ōtāhuhu Historical Society has followed a logical staged approach. The generously shared their expert local Ōtāhuhu study required a Detailed (Level 3) knowledge and archival records. assessment which involves broad contextual Barry Haddock, Ōtāhuhu, research and initial identification of places of Auckland Libraries, potential interest, followed by prioritized study Ōtāhuhu Library, lists and detailed research and assessment Bruce Ringer and Sharon Smith, South where appropriate to evaluate the heritage Auckland Research Centre, significance of places that may justify specific Auckland Council Archives, controls and management, including for Auckland Architecture Archive, scheduling and/ or special character overlays. Archives New Zealand. In general the stages of work include: FINAL REV. 5, AUG 2014 5 OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Figure 1: Ōtāhuhu Study area FINAL REV. 5, AUG 2014 6 OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 1.5 Overview of report structure and Where preliminary research highlighted values component parts that appeared significant, priorities for more detailed investigation were developed. This report provides an overview of the Ōtāhuhu Historic Heritage Survey. The Research information gathered for a wide appendices which follow in the Overview number of places in Ōtāhuhu has been Report include input from the consultant team
Recommended publications
  • Bombay Otahuhu Regional Major Capex Project

    Bombay Otahuhu Regional Major Capex Project

    BOMBAY OTAHUHU REGIONAL MAJOR CAPEX PROJECT MAJOR CAPEX PROPOSAL Transpower New Zealand Limited May 2020 BOMBAY OTAHUHU REGIONAL MAJOR CAPEX PROJECT © Transpower New Zealand Limited 2007. All rights reserved. i Glossary Table of Contents Glossary................................................................................................................................ 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 6 The purpose of this document ............................................................................................... 6 The need for investment ....................................................................................................... 7 Option assessment ............................................................................................................... 8 1 The Proposal ............................................................................................................. 12 2 The Need ................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 12 2.1.1 Capacity of existing assets in the Bombay-Otahuhu region ................................... 13 2.1.2 Future demand growth in the region ...................................................................... 14 2.1.3 Asset condition .....................................................................................................
  • (AMETI) Is a Group of Projects That Will Give Residents of South Eastern Subur

    (AMETI) Is a Group of Projects That Will Give Residents of South Eastern Subur

    About AMETI The Auckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative (AMETI) is a group of projects that will give residents of South Eastern suburbs improved transport Merton Rd Key choices and better connect them to the rest of Auckland. Stage 1 Panmure (complete) The University of l Auckland Te Horeta Rd The key project is New Zealand’s first urban busway with buses travelling on their own congestion free l New Panmure Station lanes between Panmure, Pakuranga and Botany town centres. The busway ensures maximum reliability Stage 2 Te Horeta Rd extension l New Panmure Intersection and faster travel. The new Panmure Station and 1.5km Te Horeta Road are already delivering benefits. M orr to Glen Innes (proposed) l New Panmure Bridge i n Additional bus stations at Pakuranga, Botany and Sylvia Park are also planned. Rd l Busway Lagoon Dr & Pakuranga Rd Shared cycle lanes Why is AMETI needed? and footpath Dedicated cycle lane The South Eastern suburbs are one of Auckland’s most populated areas. Residents have poor access to Te Horeta Road Pillkington Rd Ho bson employment opportunities because the transport network cannot properly deal with demand during Panmure Station new St Future developments s bus/rail interchange D re unn C peak hours. Residents have limited travel choices resulting in an over-reliance on private vehicle trips. Rd es (now open) Mo Coat un ta in Gre R en Rd Ellerslie d Public transport is currently a relatively poor option because buses get caught in the same congestion Pan mure Jellicoe Rd Hwy Pleas New Panmure ant Vie as cars, resulting in long travel times.
  • Recapturing Our Identity Through Arts and Crafts" Event to Make Sure That Doesn't Occur

    Recapturing Our Identity Through Arts and Crafts" Event to Make Sure That Doesn't Occur

    Rez Car Show Teaching Hammock Youth Conference “Looking Back at the Seminole Trail” Page 3 Page 13 Page 14 Presort Standard U.S. Postage Paid S. Florida, FL Permit No. 1624 “Voice of the Unconquered” 50¢ www.seminoletribe.com Volume XXIV • Number 11 August 15, 2003 2003-2004 Seminole Princesses Hollywood Youth Conference Visits Historical Sites “Looking Back at the Seminole Trail” ORLANDO — Members of the Hollywood Youth Conference journeyed back in time, visiting the historic grounds of Fort King, Castillo de San Marcos, and the infamous Dade Battlefield. "Looking Back at the Seminole Trail" offered Seminoles a look into their distinguished past. From July 7 through 11, Children and adults learned about the brave warriors who refused to relin- quish their land, their homes, and their way of life. The Seminoles fought back against the U.S. Army and never signed a treaty, which is why the Seminoles are known as "The Unconquered." On Tuesday July 8, Chairman Mitchell Cypress, President Moses B. Osceola, Hollywood Council Representative Max B. Osceola, and Michael Kelly Hollywood Board Representative David DeHass Dan Osceola prefers using cypress wood for his carvings. spoke to everyone in attendance. They stressed the importance of the Youth Conference and wanted each and everyone to get something out of it. "As a youth, we didn't get much of a chance to see all these historic sites. We only read about Recapturing Our them. You all have the opportunity to see history," said Mitchell Cypress. Moses Osceola stated, "The staff has planned Identity Through some great things for you this week.
  • Parks Recreation and Heritage Forum Agenda

    Parks Recreation and Heritage Forum Agenda

    I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Parks Recreation and Heritage Forum will be held on: Date: Tuesday, 14 August 2012 Time: 1.00pm Meeting Room: Reception Lounge Venue: Auckland Town Hall 301-305 Queen Street Auckland Parks Recreation and Heritage Forum OPEN AGENDA MEMBERSHIP Chairperson Cr Sandra Coney, QSO Deputy Chairperson Cr Wayne Walker Members Mr James Brown Cr Alf Filipaina Cr Hon Chris Fletcher Cr Michael Goudie Cr Ann Hartley, JP Cr Mike Lee Ms Anahera Morehu Cr Dick Quax Cr Noelene Raffills, JP Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBE Cr Penny Webster Ex Officio Mayor, Len Brown, JP Deputy Mayor, Penny Hulse Ex Officio (without All other Councillors voting rights) Independent Maori Chairperson, Independent Maori Statutory Board, Mr David Taipari Statutory Board Alternate (Quorum 6 members) Elaine Stephenson Committee Secretary 9 August 2012 Contact Telephone: (09) 373 6328 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Parks Recreation and Heritage Forum 14 August 2012 ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Apologies 5 2 Declaration of Interest 5 3 Confirmation of Minutes 5 4 Petitions 5 5 Public Input 5 5.1 Auckland Library Heritage Trust 5 5.2 Friends of Mangawhau 5 5.3 Weed Management Advisory 6 6 Local Board Input 6 6.1 Waitakere Ranges Local Board 6 7 Extraordinary Business 6 8 Notices of Motion 7 9 Auckland Libraries Regional Heritage Collections 9 10 Update on the development of Auckland Council’s weed management policy 19 11 Local Board engagement in decision making allocation for
  • Auckland Libraries RDA Monograph Standard

    Auckland Libraries RDA Monograph Standard

    Auckland Libraries Cataloguing policy for monographs The following document contains the minimum requirements for cataloguing using RDA instructions. For full instructions refer to the RDA Toolkit. Auckland Libraries policy on the use of RDA for monograph records is as follows: For Original Cataloguing • Catalogue the title in hand as to what the material is, not the collection the material is being allocated to, e.g. children’s fiction being allocated to a nonfiction collection should have children’s fiction subject headings only. • Use the current Auckland Libraries RDA policy for monographs. For Copy Cataloguing RDA • Catalogue the title in hand as to what the material is, not the collection the material is being allocated to, e.g. children’s fiction being allocated to a nonfiction collection should have children’s fiction subject headings only. • If an RDA record is available, use it and make revisions based on RDA instructions, LC practice, and local coding practices. • If only an AACR2 record is available upgrade record to RDA using the current Auckland Libraries RDA policy for monographs. • If only a hybrid AACR2/RDA record is available upgrade record to RDA using the current Auckland Libraries RDA policy for monographs General Information about RDA and RDA Coding Practices RDA Content -- The content of RDA introduces new concepts with a new organizational scheme that is closely aligned with the entity-attribute-relationship conceptual models of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD). RDA does not prescribe any standard for display purposes, but for now most libraries will continue to use MARC and International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD).
  • Download Original Attachment

    Download Original Attachment

    Call Sign Location AAA OHAKEA AAA1 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA2 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA3 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA4 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA5 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA6 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA7 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA8 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA9 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD1 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD10 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD11 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD12 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD14 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD15 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD16 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD17 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD18 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD19 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD2 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD20 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD21 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD22 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD23 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD24 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD25 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD26 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD27 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD28 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD29 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD3 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD30 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD31 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD32 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD33 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD34 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD35 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD4 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD5 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD50 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD51 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD52 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD6 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD7 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD8 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD9 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADN AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS1 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS2 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS3 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS4 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS5 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAF10 METRO CRIME AAF11 METRO CRIME AAF12
  • A Diachronic Study of Unparliamentary Language in the New Zealand Parliament, 1890-1950

    A Diachronic Study of Unparliamentary Language in the New Zealand Parliament, 1890-1950

    WITHDRAW AND APOLOGISE: A DIACHRONIC STUDY OF UNPARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE IN THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT, 1890-1950 BY RUTH GRAHAM A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Linguistics Victoria University of Wellington 2016 ii “Parliament, after all, is not a Sunday school; it is a talking-shop; a place of debate”. (Barnard, 1943) iii Abstract This study presents a diachronic analysis of the language ruled to be unparliamentary in the New Zealand Parliament from 1890 to 1950. While unparliamentary language is sometimes referred to as ‘parliamentary insults’ (Ilie, 2001), this study has a wider definition: the language used in a legislative chamber is unparliamentary when it is ruled or signalled by the Speaker as out of order or likely to cause disorder. The user is required to articulate a statement of withdrawal and apology or risk further censure. The analysis uses the Communities of Practice theoretical framework, developed by Wenger (1998) and enhanced with linguistic impoliteness, as defined by Mills (2005) in order to contextualise the use of unparliamentary language within a highly regulated institutional setting. The study identifies and categorises the lexis of unparliamentary language, including a focus on examples that use New Zealand English or te reo Māori. Approximately 2600 examples of unparliamentary language, along with bibliographic, lexical, descriptive and contextual information, were entered into a custom designed relational database. The examples were categorised into three: ‘core concepts’, ‘personal reflections’ and the ‘political environment’, with a number of sub-categories. This revealed a previously unknown category of ‘situation dependent’ unparliamentary language and a creative use of ‘animal reflections’.
  • TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach

    TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach

    Warkworth Makarau Waiwera Puhoi TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach Wainui EPSOM .............. $1,791,000 HILLSBOROUGH ....... $1,100,000 WATTLE DOWNS ......... $856,750 Orewa PONSONBY ........... $1,775,000 ONE TREE HILL ...... $1,100,000 WARKWORTH ............ $852,500 REMUERA ............ $1,730,000 BLOCKHOUSE BAY ..... $1,097,250 BAYVIEW .............. $850,000 Kaukapakapa GLENDOWIE .......... $1,700,000 GLEN INNES ......... $1,082,500 TE ATATŪ SOUTH ....... $850,000 WESTMERE ........... $1,700,000 EAST TĀMAKI ........ $1,080,000 UNSWORTH HEIGHTS ..... $850,000 Red Beach Army Bay PINEHILL ........... $1,694,000 LYNFIELD ........... $1,050,000 TITIRANGI ............ $843,000 KOHIMARAMA ......... $1,645,500 OREWA .............. $1,050,000 MOUNT WELLINGTON ..... $830,000 Tindalls Silverdale Beach SAINT HELIERS ...... $1,640,000 BIRKENHEAD ......... $1,045,500 HENDERSON ............ $828,000 Gulf Harbour DEVONPORT .......... $1,575,000 WAINUI ............. $1,030,000 BIRKDALE ............. $823,694 Matakatia GREY LYNN .......... $1,492,000 MOUNT ROSKILL ...... $1,015,000 STANMORE BAY ......... $817,500 Stanmore Bay MISSION BAY ........ $1,455,000 PAKURANGA .......... $1,010,000 PAPATOETOE ........... $815,000 Manly SCHNAPPER ROCK ..... $1,453,100 TORBAY ............. $1,001,000 MASSEY ............... $795,000 Waitoki Wade HAURAKI ............ $1,450,000 BOTANY DOWNS ....... $1,000,000 CONIFER GROVE ........ $783,500 Stillwater Heads Arkles MAIRANGI BAY ....... $1,450,000 KARAKA ............. $1,000,000 ALBANY ............... $782,000 Bay POINT CHEVALIER .... $1,450,000 OTEHA .............. $1,000,000 GLENDENE ............. $780,000 GREENLANE .......... $1,429,000 ONEHUNGA ............. $999,000 NEW LYNN ............. $780,000 Okura Bush GREENHITHE ......... $1,425,000 PAKURANGA HEIGHTS .... $985,350 TAKANINI ............. $780,000 SANDRINGHAM ........ $1,385,000 HELENSVILLE .......... $985,000 GULF HARBOUR ......... $778,000 TAKAPUNA ........... $1,356,000 SUNNYNOOK ............ $978,000 MĀNGERE .............
  • The Politics of Presence: Political Representation and New Zealand’S Asian Members of Parliament

    The Politics of Presence: Political Representation and New Zealand’S Asian Members of Parliament

    THE POLITICS OF PRESENCE: POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AND NEW ZEALAND’S ASIAN MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT By Seonah Choi A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science at Victoria University of Wellington 2014 2 Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... 5 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter I: Introduction .......................................................................................................... 8 Chapter II: Literature Review .............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Representative Democracy ........................................................................................ 11 2.2 Theories of Political Representation .......................................................................... 12 2.3 Theories of Minority Representation ......................................................................... 27 2.4 Formulating a Framework ........................................................................................
  • Public Safety and Nuisance Bylaw 2013

    Public Safety and Nuisance Bylaw 2013

    Te Ture ā-Rohe Marutau ā-Iwi me te Whakapōrearea 2013 Public Safety and Nuisance Bylaw 2013 (as at 11 January 2021) made by the Governing Body of Auckland Council in resolution GB/2013/84 on 22 August 2013 Bylaw made under sections 145, 146 and 149 of the Local Government Act 2002 and section 64 of the Health Act 1956. Summary This summary is not part of the Bylaw but explains the general effects. The purpose of this Bylaw is to help people to enjoy Auckland’s public places by – • identifying bad behaviours that must be avoided in public places in clause 6, for example disturbing other people or using an object in a way that is dangerous or causes a nuisance • identifying restricted activities in Schedule 1, for example, fireworks, drones, fences, fires, weapons, storing objects, camping or set netting • enabling the restriction of certain activities and access to public places in clauses 7, 8 and 10. Other parts of this Bylaw assist with its administration by – • stating the name of this Bylaw and when it comes into force in clauses 1 and 2 • stating where and when this Bylaw applies in clause 3, in particular that it does not apply to issues covered in other Auckland Council, Auckland Transport or Maunga Authority bylaws • stating the purpose of this Bylaw and defining terms used in clauses 4 and 5 • providing transparency about how decisions are made under this Bylaw in clauses 9 and 11 • referencing Council’s powers to enforce this Bylaw, including powers to take property and penalties up to $20,000 in clauses 12, 13 and 14 • ensuring decisions made prior to amendments coming into force on 01 October 2019 continue to apply in Clause 15 • providing time for bylaw provisions about vehicles to be addressed under the Auckland Council Traffic Bylaw 2015 in clause 16.
  • IN the MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and in THE

    IN the MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and in THE

    IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a Board of Inquiry appointed under s149J of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider Notice of Requirements and applications for Resource Consent made by the New Zealand Transport Agency in relation to the East West Link roading proposal in Auckland. STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE LEMAUNGA LYDIA SOSENE ON BEHALF OF THE MANGERE-OTAHUHU LOCAL BOARD CONTENTS CLAUSE PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2. MOLB'S VIEWS ON THE PROPOSAL ............................................................................ 1 3. GENERAL ....................................................................................................................... 3 Lemaunga Sosene_ Board Member _ FINAL need signature - 29238877 v 1.DOC 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 My name is Lemauga Lydia Sosene. I am the Local board chairperson of the Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board (MOLB or board). 1.2 The Mangere-Otahuhu Local Board (the Board) supports the proposed East- West Link development in principle, subject to some comments on specific matters set out below. 1.3 The Board also supports the general objective of this development, such as, improved access ways and facilities between SH20 and SH1 along the northern edge of the Mangere inlet and surrounding areas, including the Princes Street junction for vehicles, cyclists and pedestrian safety. 1.4 The East-West Link Connection development aligns with key transport priorities set in the Mangere-Otahuhu Board Plan’s outcome “A well- connected area”: Improving connections in our area through safer streets, quality public transport, cycle ways and greenways. to live in a place that is easy to travel around. This is important to the well- being of our community... crucial to delivering our economic aims of developing tourism and growing businesses in our area.
  • Newsletterauckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative

    Newsletterauckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative

    Capturing Panmure’s past About the AMETI transport projects As AMETI progresses and the Panmure area is transformed, we take a look back at the history The Auckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative (AMETI) is a group of transport projects of one of Auckland’s first settlements….. for the south east (Panmure, Mt Wellington, Pakuranga, Howick and Botany). Key North south road NewsletterAuckland Manukau Eastern Transport Initiative. AMETI October 2013 Phase 1 Panmure Merton Rd extension l North/South Rd l New Panmure Station A p i The University of r Auckland a n Phase 2 Panmure to Pakuranga a Makeover for historic lagoon A l New Panmure Intersection Quarry v e l Busway Lagoon Dr & Pakuranga Rd Stonefields Link Rd l New Panmure Bridge Work gets underway on a major makeover for a forgotten corner of Panmure. M l New Reeves Rd Flyover orr i n R d A forgotten and neglected historic corner of Panmure Watercare is also carrying out a stormwater Future developments is getting a major makeover as part of one of Auckland’s pipe upgrade. South Eastern Connections biggest transport projects. Study Just off Mt Wellington Highway, Van Damme’s Lagoon New north-south road Pillkington Rd H obson Work is underway on upgrading and has been through a number of changes in its history. Panmure Station St s new bus/rail D re unn C revitalising Van Damme’s Lagoon and reserve Rd es interchange Mo Coat un (story continues on page three) ta in Gre as part of AMETI. E R en Rd llersl d ie Pan mu re Jellicoe Rd Hwy Pleas New Panmure ant V Mt Wellington iew Mt Wellington intersection Shopping Centre Panmure to Pakuranga y Ellerslie-Panmure Highway Bridge opens w d Major milestone – R north side busway H and Panmure n el L o r a t I g o o lling e n W D In 1841, the government purchased what was then known More than 2500 men, women and children arrived in t r M as the Kohimarama block from Ngati Paoa.