GAMBLING IMPACT ASSESSMENT: for Auckland City Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GAMBLING IMPACT ASSESSMENT: for Auckland City Council Auckland UniServices Limited GAMBLING IMPACT ASSESSMENT: For Auckland City Council, Manukau City Council, North Shore City Council, Waitakere City Council, Franklin District Council, Papakura District Council, and Rodney District Council Part One: Introduction and overview January 2004 Presented by Billie Harbidge Auckland UniServices Limited Private Bag 92019 AUCKLAND Phone: +64 9 373 7522 Fax: +64 9 373 7412 Email: [email protected] Principle Investigator Dr Peter Adams Centre for Gambling Studies, University of Auckland Contact for more Contact for more information should be information directed to an appropriate Territorial Authority representative. In the first instance contact: Julie Francombe Environmental Policy Advisor North Shore City Council 486 8400 extn. 8924 email:[email protected] Katherine Palmer Community Policy Analyst Rodney District Council 0800 426 5169 email: [email protected] Gambling Impact Assessment for the Seven Auckland Territorial Authorities – Part 1: January 2004 IN ASSOCIATION WITH CENTRE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH AND POLICY, UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND and MWH NEW ZEALAND LTD Prepared by: Centre for Gambling Studies Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland PO Box 26-533 Epsom Auckland New Zealand Disclaimer: This report has been prepared solely for the benefit of Auckland City Council, Manukau City Council, North Shore City Council, Waitakere City Council, Franklin District Council, Papakura District Council, and Rodney District Council. No liability is accepted by Auckland UniServices Limited or any employee or sub- consultant of this organisation with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval or to fulfil a legal requirement. 2 Gambling Impact Assessment for the Seven Auckland Territorial Authorities – Part 1: January 2004 Acknowledgements The research team wishes to acknowledge the contribution of a wide range of people to the production of this report. We first wish to thank Martin Dawe and Paula Parsonage of Evaluation Associates for their assistance in planning, coordination and writing. We thank Sylvia Allan of MWH1 New Zealand Ltd for her substantial contributions to the introductory sections of the report and Peter Matich also of MWH for his input into the planning and facilitation of the workshops. We also wish to thank the research staff of the University’s Centre for Health Services Research and Policy (CHSRP), particularly the contributions of Lisa Walton and Michael Law. We thank staff of the Problem Gambling Foundation for their support for the project, particularly the Chair, Richard Northey, and the CEO, John Stansfield. We acknowledge Dr Maria Bellringer for her early work in administration of the project, Billie Harbidge for her ongoing input into organisation and contracting of staff, Associate Professor John Raeburn for his input into the workshops, Dr Lorna Dyall for her input on Maori dimensions to the project and Roger French for his assistance in data collection. We are grateful for the support of staff from the seven territorial authorities who contributed to the running of the workshops and particularly to Annika Lane (Waitakere City Council) and Kathy Hood (Auckland City Council) for their considerable inputs. We also acknowledge the Gambling Problem Helpline for their assistance in accessing client service information, Dr Grant Paton-Simpson for his help in accessing service databases, and John Hannifin of Problem Gambling Purchasing Agency for assistance on locating database sources. Finally, we wish to strongly thank all the people who took time out to turn up for the workshops and contributed actively their views and concerns. Citation: Adams, P., Rossen, F., Perese, L., Townsend, S., Brown, R., Brown, P. & Garland, J. (2004) Gambling Impact Assessment for Seven Auckland Territorial Authorities. Centre for Gambling Studies, University of Auckland. 1 Montgomery Watson Harva New Zealand Ltd 3 Gambling Impact Assessment for the Seven Auckland Territorial Authorities – Part 1: January 2004 Table of contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................7 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................14 1.1 CONTEXT .....................................................................................................................................14 1.2 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT.......................................................................................................15 1.3 REPORT STRUCTURE.....................................................................................................................17 1.4 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................18 2. OVERVIEW OF GAMBLING TRENDS AND IMPACTS ........................................................20 2.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................20 2.2 DEMOGRAPHICS OF NEW ZEALAND GAMBLERS ...........................................................................20 2.3 PROBLEM GAMBLING ...................................................................................................................21 2.4 COMPARISON WITH GAMBLING IN AUSTRALIA .............................................................................23 2.5 GAMBLING IMPACTS ....................................................................................................................25 2.6 BENEFITS FROM GAMBLING..........................................................................................................37 2.7 CONCLUSION OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL GAMBLING TRENDS AND IMPACTS.................39 3. OVERVIEW OF AUCKLAND REGIONAL DATA ...................................................................41 3.1 CENSUS AREA UNIT ANALYSES....................................................................................................41 3.2 CENSUS AREA UNIT RESULTS FOR THE AUCKLAND REGION BY TERRITORIAL AUTHORITY .........44 3.3 DISTRIBUTION OF GAMBLING MACHINE FUNDS ...........................................................................61 3.4 SKY CITY CASINO.........................................................................................................................68 3.5 TOTALISATOR AGENCY BOARD (TAB) AND GAMBLING MACHINES............................................70 3.6 GAMBLING PROBLEM HELPLINE DATA.........................................................................................71 3.7 PERSONAL COUNSELLING DATA...................................................................................................73 3.8 REGIONAL SUMMARY OF WORKSHOP DATA ..................................................................................80 4. ISSUES, POLICY OPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................86 4.1 LIMITATIONS OF THE RESEARCH ...................................................................................................87 4.2 OPTIONS FOR GATHERING INFORMATION FOR INDICATORS IN THE FUTURE...................................87 4.3 TAB VENUE POLICY OPTIONS......................................................................................................88 4.4 CLASS 4 VENUE POLICY OPTIONS.................................................................................................90 4.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................................93 BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................................................................................................................96 APPENDIX 1: GAMBLING INDICATOR FRAMEWORK..........................................................98 FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING IMPACTS OF GAMBLING ............................................................98 POLICY IMPLICATIONS AND INDICATORS OF THE FUTURE ................................................................103 APPENDIX 2: HELPLINE DATA COPYRIGHT, LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMER .......107 APPENDIX 3: SPECIALIST GAMBLING SERVICES IN THE AUCKLAND REGION .......108 APPENDIX 4: MAP OF GAMBLING MACHINES PER CAPITA ............................................109 APPENDIX 5 LOCAL CLUBS AND TRUSTS OPERATING IN THE AUCKLAND REGION BY TA (SOURCE: DIA WEBSITE, JANUARY 2004)...................................................................110 Gambling Impact Assessment for the Seven Auckland Territorial Authorities – Part 1: January 2004 Table of figures and tables FIGURE 1: ACTUAL EXPENDITURE (LOSS) BY MODE IN NEW ZEALAND (SOURCE: DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS, 2002).............................................................................................................21 FIGURE 2: NUMBER OF NEW CLIENTS USING TELEPHONE HELPLINE AND PERSONAL COUNSELLING SERVICES IN NEW ZEALAND (SOURCE: PROBLEM GAMBLING PURCHASING AGENT, 2003)...........22 FIGURE 3: GAMBLER’S PRIMARY PROBLEM MODE - NEW PERSONAL COUNSELLING CLIENTS IN NEW ZEALAND FOR 2002 (SOURCE: PROBLEM GAMBLING PURCHASING AGENT, 2003)........................23 TABLE
Recommended publications
  • A Diachronic Study of Unparliamentary Language in the New Zealand Parliament, 1890-1950
    WITHDRAW AND APOLOGISE: A DIACHRONIC STUDY OF UNPARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE IN THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT, 1890-1950 BY RUTH GRAHAM A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Linguistics Victoria University of Wellington 2016 ii “Parliament, after all, is not a Sunday school; it is a talking-shop; a place of debate”. (Barnard, 1943) iii Abstract This study presents a diachronic analysis of the language ruled to be unparliamentary in the New Zealand Parliament from 1890 to 1950. While unparliamentary language is sometimes referred to as ‘parliamentary insults’ (Ilie, 2001), this study has a wider definition: the language used in a legislative chamber is unparliamentary when it is ruled or signalled by the Speaker as out of order or likely to cause disorder. The user is required to articulate a statement of withdrawal and apology or risk further censure. The analysis uses the Communities of Practice theoretical framework, developed by Wenger (1998) and enhanced with linguistic impoliteness, as defined by Mills (2005) in order to contextualise the use of unparliamentary language within a highly regulated institutional setting. The study identifies and categorises the lexis of unparliamentary language, including a focus on examples that use New Zealand English or te reo Māori. Approximately 2600 examples of unparliamentary language, along with bibliographic, lexical, descriptive and contextual information, were entered into a custom designed relational database. The examples were categorised into three: ‘core concepts’, ‘personal reflections’ and the ‘political environment’, with a number of sub-categories. This revealed a previously unknown category of ‘situation dependent’ unparliamentary language and a creative use of ‘animal reflections’.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Gazette
    Dumb. 53. 2217 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE WffiLLING'rON, 'rHURSDAY, JUI-,Y 24, 1$130. Proclaiming the Borough of Palmerston North to be a City. FIRST RCHEDUI,E. , ALI. those areas in t.he Auckland Land District, containing [L.s.] BLEDISLOE, Governor-General. by admeasurement 8 acres 3 roods 39·6 perches, more or A PROCLAMATION. less, being the pieces of road closed by Proclamation dated ;\ i HEREAS a petition has becn received from the Mayor, 28th May, 1930, and publi.hed ;n Gault __ of the 5th day of \ . \ Councillors, and Burgesses of the Borough of Palmers­ .June, 1930, and being the parcels of land more particularly ton North, praying that the said borough be proclaimed a city described as follows :- under the provisions of the Municipal C',orporations Act, 1920 : Firstly: 1 acre 3 roods J 9·1) perches, more or less. Bounded, And whereas the population of the said borough is not commencing at the westernmost corner of Allotment 218, less t·han twenty thousand: Apata Parish; towards the south-west by Allotment 230 of And whereas" it is desirable that effect should be given the said parish, .~2·8 links; towards the north-west by a to the said petition : puhlic road, 3·7 links, 116·7 links, 174-0 link., and 60· 1 links; Now, therefore, I, Charles, Baron Bledialoe, the Governor­ again towards the north·west generally by Allotment. 217, General of the Dominion of New Zealand, in pursuance and Al'ata Parish, 57·2 links, 127·9 links, 693'0 links, 605·9 links, exercise of the powers conferred upon me by section one and 62·9 links to a public road; towards the north by thl' hundred and thirty of the Municipal Corporations Act, 1920, said public road, 114·i links; to" arda the south-east generally do hereby proclaim the Borough of Palmerston North to be a by Allotment 218, Apata Parish, 158·[; links, 61)6,1 links, city as on and from the first day of August, one thousand 726'0 links, 31>2·7 links, and 140·3 links, to the point of nine hundred and thirty.
    [Show full text]
  • Otahuhu Historic Heritage Survey
    OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY Overview Report PREPARED FOR AUCKLAND COUNCIL BY MATTHEWS & MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS LTD IN ASSOCIATION WITH LYN WILLIAMS LISA TRUTTMAN BRUCE W HAYWARD CLOUGH & ASSOCIATES LTD JP ADAM RA SKIDMORE URBAN DESIGN LTD FINAL August 2014 OTAHUHU HISTORIC HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Brief .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 The Study area ................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Methodology and Approach .............................................................................. 5 1.4 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................... 5 1.5 Overview of report structure and component parts ........................................... 7 2.0 ŌTĀHUHU STUDY AREA-SUMMARY OF HISTORIC HERITAGE ISSUES ....... 9 2.1 Built Heritage Overview and recommendations ................................................ 9 2.2 Overview and recommendations in relation to geology .................................. 12 2.3 Overview and recommendations in relation to archaeology ........................... 13 2.4 Overview and recommendations Landscape History ...................................... 13 2.5 Overview and recommendations related to Maori Ancestral Relationships and issues identified. ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Azette of THURSDAY, 10 SEPTEMBER 1992
    SUPPLEMENT to 3067 The New Zealand azette OF THURSDAY, 10 SEPTEMBER 1992 WELLINGTON: FRIDAY, 11 SEPTEMBER 1992 - ISSUE NO. 146 OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED BOUNDARIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS OF ELECTORAL DISTRICTS OF NEW ZEALAND 3068 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 146 Objections to Proposed Boundaries and Council boundary to include the Moerewa, Kawakawa and Classifications of Electoral Districts of New Towai regions in the Bay of Islands Electorate. Zealand The Representation Commission appointed pursuant to 002 Hobson section 15 of the Electoral Act 1956 hereby publishes, in accordance with the provisions of section 18 of that Act, a Objection 0905 Raumanga Community Association summary of the objections lodged with the Commission to the Objects to the inclusion of Raumanga and Smeatons Drive in proposed boundaries of the electoral districts as set out in the the Hobson Electorate on the grounds they are recognised as Schedule hereto. being part of the Whangarei City area. Residents consider they The objections are available for public inspection at the offices have more common bond with the Whangarei City area than of the Department of Survey and Land Information at the urban Hobson area. Seek changing the electoral boundary Auckland, Hamilton, Gisborne, Napier, New Plymouth, of the Whangarei Electorate to a position bounded by the old Wellington, Nelson, Blenheim, Hokitika, Christchurch, Whangarei City boundary (map provided) and to shift the Dunedin and lnvercargill from 11 September 1992 until 4 pm Hobson boundary to the old Whangarei City south boundary. on the 28th day of September 1992. The Representation Commission will receive written counter­ 005 Albany objections to those objections, or any of them, if in the hands of the Commission no later than 4 pm, Monday 28 September Objection 0846 J Allen , Chairman, Albany LEC 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Roll of Members of the New Zealand House of Representatives, 1854 Onwards
    Roll of members of the New Zealand House of Representatives, 1854 onwards Sources: New Zealand Parliamentary Record, Newspapers, Political Party websites, New Zealand Gazette, New Zealand Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), Political Party Press Releases, Appendix to the Journal of the House of Representatives, E.9. Last updated: 17 November 2020 Abbreviations for the party affiliations are as follows: ACT ACT (Association of Consumers and Taxpayers) Lib. Liberal All. Alliance LibLab. Liberal Labour CD Christian Democrats Mana Mana Party Ch.H Christian Heritage ManaW. Mana Wahine Te Ira Tangata Party Co. Coalition Maori Maori Party Con. Conservative MP Mauri Pacific CR Coalition Reform Na. National (1925 Liberals) CU Coalition United Nat. National Green Greens NatLib. National Liberal Party (1905) ILib. Independent Liberal NL New Labour ICLib. Independent Coalition Liberal NZD New Zealand Democrats Icon. Independent Conservative NZF New Zealand First ICP Independent Country Party NZL New Zealand Liberals ILab. Independent Labour PCP Progressive Coalition ILib. Independent Liberal PP Progressive Party (“Jim Anderton’s Progressives”) Ind. Independent R Reform IP. Independent Prohibition Ra. Ratana IPLL Independent Political Labour League ROC Right of Centre IR Independent Reform SC Social Credit IRat. Independent Ratana SD Social Democrat IU Independent United U United Lab. Labour UFNZ United Future New Zealand UNZ United New Zealand The end dates of tenure before 1984 are the date the House was dissolved, and the end dates after 1984 are the date of the election. (NB. There were no political parties as such before 1890) Name Electorate Parl’t Elected Vacated Reason Party ACLAND, Hugh John Dyke 1904-1981 Temuka 26-27 07.02.1942 04.11.1946 Defeated Nat.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Map • Boat Directory • Entertainment Schedule • Special Events AWBF Program A4 V2 Layout 1 16/01/13 11:44 AM Page 2
    AWBF_Program A4_v2_Layout 1 16/01/13 11:44 AM Page 1 $3.00 OFFICIAL PROGRAM Contents include: • Site Map • Boat Directory • Entertainment Schedule • Special Events AWBF_Program A4_v2_Layout 1 16/01/13 11:44 AM Page 2 A VERY SHORT HISTORY OF THE AWBF In 1994, following a visit to the famous Maritime Festival in Brest, France, local yachtsman Andy Gamlin got together with fellow sailors Ian Johnston and Cathy Hawkins to plan a small event on a similar theme for Hobart, Tasmania. What WELCOME FROM began as a social gathering for wooden boat enthusiasts has now grown to be the largest event of its kind in the Southern Hemisphere, attracting 160,000 visitors in 2011. THE PREMIER The guiding principle is still the same: to celebrate our maritime heritage and culture and the enduring beauty of Welcome to Hobart’s magnificent waterfront for wooden boats. We gather every two years (this is the 10th the tenth MyState Australia Wooden Boat Festival. Festival) and welcome visitors from all over the world. The Festival provides an opportunity to marvel at The event continues to grow as more and more people the wooden boats of the past while admiring the recognise the values of community and craftsmanship the craftsmanship displayed in the beautiful wooden Festival embodies. Our magnificent deep-water harbour, our vessels built today. natural environment and genuine Tasmanian hospitality are our strengths and we look to them to carry us forward into All around Hobart’s Sullivans Cove you will find the the future. ‘old salts’ explaining their crafts and passing on the traditional skills of boatbuilding.
    [Show full text]
  • Zl1aa - Auckland Branch 02 April 2019
    ZL1AA - AUCKLAND BRANCH 02 APRIL 2019 General Meeting SAT Apr. 20 @1330 Vaughan Henderson, ZL1VH Klondyke Tower Update Club Room will be open at 10:30 AM Photo Credit: ZL2AJ / Emma HELP SUPPORT KLONDYKE ZL1AA ZL1AA Information: Branch Contacts: Gwynne Rowe, ZL1AAR Auckland Branch 02 Branch 02 Clubroom is located at PO Box 18003 400 St Johns Road (09)-528-1177 Glen Innes St Heliers, Auckland Auckland 1743 (Off the main road) Branch Examiners: Steve Miller, ZL1FS Google Earth: 021 0226-4981 www.qsl.net/zl1aa 36.869730s, 174.843860e Wallace Bottomley, ZL1WAL [email protected] (09) 575-6383 Skype: ZL1AA_NZ Clubroom is open every Saturday from Wes Printz, ZL3TE 1030 hrs. for members and guests to drop 027 227-7779 by for coffee and a chat! Web Master: Club Officers Andrei Chatalov, ZL1TM General meetings are held on the third President: Saturday of each month at 1330 hrs. [email protected] Wes Printz, ZL3TE (except Dec / Jan). Librarian: [email protected] Olivier Wardecki,ZL1XS 027 227-7779 Committee meetings are held on the first [email protected] Tuesday of each month at 1930 hrs. ALL Station Trustees: Vice President: paid members are welcome to attend. George Marr, ZL1TUJ Jim Smith, ZL1TGS Wes Printz, ZL3TE [email protected] Affiliations: 027 492-5152 10-10 International Branch Technical Advisers: NZART Simon Watt-Wyness, ZL1SWW Secretary: AMSAT-ZL [email protected] Wallace Bottomley, ZL1WAL Club nets: [email protected] Thursday: (09) 575-6383 145.775 MHz @ 1930 Steve, ZL1FS NCO HF Net on Hiatus Treasurer: Jeff Lowe ZL1TOU 10-10 Down
    [Show full text]
  • Roll of Members of the New Zealand House of Representatives, 1854 Onwards
    Roll of members of the New Zealand House of Representatives, 1854 onwards Sources: New Zealand Parliamentary Record, Newspapers, Political Party websites, New Zealand Gazette, New Zealand Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), Political Party Press Releases, Appendix to the Journal of the House of Representatives, E.9. Last updated: 24 May 2019 Abbreviations for the party affiliations are as follows: ACT ACT (Association of Consumers and Taxpayers) Lib. Liberal All. Alliance LibLab. Liberal Labour CD Christian Democrats Mana Mana Party Ch.H Christian Heritage ManaW. Mana Wahine Te Ira Tangata Party Co. Coalition Maori Maori Party Con. Conservative MP Mauri Pacific CR Coalition Reform Na. National (1925 Liberals) CU Coalition United Nat. National Green Greens NatLib. National Liberal Party (1905) ILib. Independent Liberal NL New Labour ICLib. Independent Coalition Liberal NZD New Zealand Democrats Icon. Independent Conservative NZF New Zealand First ICP Independent Country Party NZL New Zealand Liberals ILab. Independent Labour PCP Progressive Coalition ILib. Independent Liberal PP Progressive Party (“Jim Anderton’s Progressives”) Ind. Independent R Reform IP. Independent Prohibition Ra. Ratana IPLL Independent Political Labour League ROC Right of Centre IR Independent Reform SC Social Credit IRat. Independent Ratana SD Social Democrat IU Independent United U United Lab. Labour UFNZ United Future New Zealand UNZ United New Zealand The end dates of tenure before 1984 are the date the House was dissolved, and the end dates after 1984 are the date of the election. (NB. There were no political parties as such before 1890) Name Electorate Parl’t Elected Vacated Reason Party ACLAND, Hugh John Dyke 1904-1981 Temuka 26-27 07.02.1942 04.11.1946 Defeated Nat.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Property Market & Economic Update
    Quarterly Property Market & Economic Update New Zealand | COVID-19 special edition Quarter 2, 2020 Table of Contents About CoreLogic . 3 Executive Summary . 4 Macro Economic and Demographic Indicators . 5 New Zealand Asset Classes . 6 New Zealand and Australia GDP Growth . 7 New Zealand Population and Migration .. 8 Regional Building Consents . 10 Consumer Confidence . 10 Employment . 11 Interest Rates . 12 Housing Overview . 13 Early Property Market Indicators . 14 Listings . 15 Lending conditions . 17 Sales Volumes . 18 Nationwide Values . 19 House Price Index . 20 Rent . 23 Buyer Classification . 24 Main Cities Housing Market Indicators . 25 Auckland Market Activity .. 26 Auckland Values . 27 Current Auckland Suburb Values . 28 Hamilton Market Activity . 30 Hamilton Values . 31 Tauranga Market Activity . 33 Tauranga Values . 33 Wellington Market Activity . 34 Wellington Values . 35 Christchurch Market Activity . 36 Greater Christchurch Values . 37 Dunedin Market Activity . 38 Dunedin Values . 39 CoreLogic Data and Analytics . 40 Legal Disclaimer . 42 2 About CoreLogic CoreLogic is a leading property information, analytics and Contact services provider in the United States, Australia and New Zealand. Call us 0800 355 355 CoreLogic helps clients identify and manage growth opportunities, improve performance and mitigate risk, by providing clients with Wellington office innovative, technology-based services and access to rich data Level 2, 275 Cuba Street and analytics. PO Box 4072 Wellington 6140 Whilst all reasonable effort is made to ensure the information in this publication is current, CoreLogic does not warrant the accuracy, Auckland office currency or completeness of the data and commentary contained in Level 5 this publication and to the full extent not prohibited by law excludes 41 Shortland Street all loss or damage arising in connection with the data and Auckland 1010 commentary contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilson Ornithological Club
    December 1947 THE WILSON BULLETIN Vol. 59, No. 4 THE WILSON ORNITHOLOGICAL CLUB OFFICERS, 1947 President..................................................Georg e M. Sutton First Vice-President. ................................ .Olin Sewall Pettingill, Jr. Second Vice-President. ...................................... .Maurice Brooks Secretary .............................................. James Boswell Young Treasurer...................................................Bur t L. Monroe Editor .................................................... Josselyn Van Tyne ADDITIONAL MEIGBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Elective Members Rudolf Bennitt George H. Lowery, Jr. Milton B. Trautman Past Presidents Lynds Jones Jesse M. Shaver R. M. Strong Josselyn Van Tyne T. C. Stephens Margaret M. Nice Albert F. Ganier Lawrence E. Hicks J. W. Stack S. Charles Kendeigh Trustees William G. Fargo Allyn R. Moser James Henry Bruns Representative on the American Ornithologists ’ Union Council Maurice Brooks EDITORIAL STUFF OF THE WILSON BULLEMN’ Editor. ................................................... Josselyn Van Tyne Associate Editor ........................................... .Margaret M. Nice Associate Editor. .............................. .Frederick N. Hamerstrom, Jr. Assistant Editor. ........................................ .G. Reeves Butchart CHAIRMEN OF COMMITTEES Endowment Fund ........................................... .Harold F. Wing Louis Agassiz Fuertes Research Grant ...................... John T. Emlen, Jr. Membershi~.................................................Walte
    [Show full text]
  • Roll of Members of the New Zealand House of Representatives, 1854 Onwards
    Roll of members of the New Zealand House of Representatives, 1854 onwards Sources: New Zealand Parliamentary Record, Newspapers, Political Party websites, New Zealand Gazette, New Zealand Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), Political Party Press Releases, Appendix to the Journal of the House of Representatives, E.9. Last updated: 17 June 2021 Abbreviations for the party affiliations are as follows: ACT ACT (Association of Consumers and Taxpayers) Lib. Liberal All. Alliance LibLab. Liberal Labour CD Christian Democrats Mana Mana Party Ch.H Christian Heritage ManaW. Mana Wahine Te Ira Tangata Party Co. Coalition Maori Maori Party Con. Conservative MP Mauri Pacific CR Coalition Reform Na. National (1925 Liberals) CU Coalition United Nat. National Green Greens NatLib. National Liberal Party (1905) ILib. Independent Liberal NL New Labour ICLib. Independent Coalition Liberal NZD New Zealand Democrats Icon. Independent Conservative NZF New Zealand First ICP Independent Country Party NZL New Zealand Liberals ILab. Independent Labour PCP Progressive Coalition ILib. Independent Liberal PP Progressive Party (“Jim Anderton’s Progressives”) Ind. Independent R Reform IP. Independent Prohibition Ra. Ratana IPLL Independent Political Labour League ROC Right of Centre IR Independent Reform SC Social Credit IRat. Independent Ratana SD Social Democrat IU Independent United U United Lab. Labour UFNZ United Future New Zealand UNZ United New Zealand The end dates of tenure before 1984 are the date the House was dissolved, and the end dates after 1984 are the date of the election. (NB. There were no political parties as such before 1890) Name Electorate Parl’t Elected Vacated Reason Party ACLAND, Hugh John Dyke 1904-1981 Temuka 26-27 07.02.1942 04.11.1946 Defeated Nat.
    [Show full text]
  • Childs Presents Motion
    The FranklinEstablished 1886 Pre## Volume 130, Number 88 Wednesday, November 5, 2014 www.thefranklinpress.com Franklin, North Carolina 28734 $1.00 Childs presents motion; Cochran case delayed Ryan Hanchett on Monday during the Macon County Superior why he no longer wanted the counsel of “We respectfully oppose the motion to [email protected] Court session, where things got off to a conten- appointed attorney Brad Tisdale. continue this matter,” prosecutor Jason Arnold tious start. Powell asked Childs to step to the “Well, I asked Mr. Tisdale to help me get said. “Mr. Childs has been in custody for One day before his trial was scheduled to defendant’s table to present the motion, but medical attention for my eyes which were dam- almost a year and if we continue the matter begin, Robert Childs requested a pro se hear- before Childs walked through the courtroom aged when I was arrested and I never actually further the next Superior Court session isn’t ing in order to fire his court-appointed attorney gate he asked if his constitutional rights would got to see a doctor until several months after until February 2015. The victims … cannot get and represent himself or hire his own attorney. be protected by the judge. my arrest,” Childs said. “I also asked (Tisdale) closure until the matter is settled.” Childs’ charges stem from an incident in “I can assure you that no matter where you to contact a friend of mine that worked for the Powell ruled against the continuance and November 2013 when he allegedly broke into stand in this courtroom your rights will be CIA and keep in touch with him about certain scheduled jury selection to begin on Tuesday.
    [Show full text]