THE IN THE LATER MIDRASHIM

RIVKA ULMER

University of Pennsylvania

The citation from one body of literature within another is one of the key characteristics of , which is, is to a cer• tain extent, a literature of citations. 1 Many of these quotations are from the Tannaitic stratum of Rabbinic literature, either the iden• tifiable works "Mishnah" and "" or the statements of the non• canonized Baraitot. In addition to the early midrashim and the Talmudim, the so called "later midrashim" incorporate quotations from the Mishnah, although in an uneven distribution.2 in generaV and in particular the homiletic later midrashim contain numerous quotations, whereas the purely aggadic later midrashim have very few Mishnah quotations. Therefore, for the purposes of this article, I divide the "later midrashim" into two very fluid and often overlapping categories: (I) The later midrashim that display the discernible forms of Rabbinic midrash or the Rabbinic homily,4

I See A. Goldberg, "Zitat und Citem. VorschHige fUr die descriptive Termino• logie der Formanalyse rabbinischer Texte," in Franlifurter Judaistische Beitriige 6 (1978) pp. 23-26. 2 The meaning of the term "later midrashim" depends upon the particular method applied to the analysis of midrash. M.D. Herr (Encyclopaedia Judaica, Je• rusalem, 1972, vo!. 11, cols. 1510-1514, s.v. "Midrash") divides this literature into early midrashim (or "classical amoraic midrashim"), midrashim of the middle period, and the late period. Here I exclude midrashic works that are mainly comprised of "halakhic midrashim" and that are companions to the Mishnah. I investigate those later midrashim that are "companions to the Talmudim" according to Neusner and some of the "later midrashim" according to Herr's categories. Some of the later midrashim are possibly pseudepigraphic, as mentioned by Herr (ibid., co!. 1513). The inclusion of midrashic works such as Gen. Rabbah, Lev. Rabbah, and Pesikta de-rav Kahana is based upon the analysis of Neusner, "Rab• binicJudaism, Formative Canon of (4): The Aggadic Documents. Midrash: The Later Compilations," in J. Neusner, AJ. Avery-Peck, and W.S. Green, eds., The Encyclopaedia ofJudaism (Leiden, Boston, Koln, 2000), vo!. Ill, pp. 1176-1206. 3 J.N. Epstein, Mavo le-Nusah Ha-Mishnah Oerusalem, 2000), pp. 759f. 4 In this group, I looked at Gen. Rabbah, Midrash , ed. Buber and printed edition, Pesikta de-rav Kahana, , Lev. Rabbah, Deut. Rabbah, Song of Songs Rabbah, Rabbah, Ecc!. Rabbah, Ruth Zutta, Lam. Zutta, Ecc!. Zutta, Song of Songs Zutta, Aggadat , Midrash Tehillim, Pirke 194 RIVKA ULMER which are often referred to as the "classical midrashim;" (II) the later, usually medieval, midrashim that are somewhat reminiscent of the previously mentioned homiletic or exegetical midrashim but show few formal characteristics and that rarely cite the Mishnah.5 In the later midrashim of the homiletic genre (I), we find interactions between different textual "canons" as well as different levels of texts interpreting each other. First there is an interaction between two "canonical" traditions, the and the Mishnah/Tosefta stratum. The next interaction is between these "canonical" texts and the midrash. However, the ultimate interaction in the later midrashim is with propositions raised from biblical lemmata and the homiletic agenda. In addition, the midrash accomplishes the exegetical pro• cedure that is often missing in the Mishnah. Usually the Mishnah states halakhic statements without displaying an involvement in the exegetical process that is underlying these statements. In their uti• lization of the Mishnah the later midrashic texts provide an exegetical framework for the Mishnah statements. de-R. Eliezer, and Num. Rabbah. The editions and translations of midrashic texts cited in this article are the following: L.M. Barth, Pirqe Rabbi Eliezer. [Under construction] (http://www.usc.edu/ dept/huc-Ia/pre-project); W. Braude, trans., Pesikta Rabbati. Discoursesfar Feasts, Fasts, and Special Sabbaths (New Haven and London, 1968, 2 vols.); S. Buber, ed., Midrash Mishle (Vilna, 1883); id., Midrash Shmu'el. (Cracow, 1883); id., Midrash ':;:,utta 'al Shir Ha-Shirim, Rut, Ekhah Ve-Kohelet. (Berlin, 1884; repr. Tel-Aviv, 1971); idem., Midrash Tanhuma Ha-Kadum Ve-Ha-Yashan. (Vilna, 1885; repr. Jerusalem, 1964); idem, Midrash Shoher Tov 'al Tehillim. (Vilna, 1890; repr.Jerusalem 1967); M. Cohen, ed., Midrash Bereshit Zutta (Jerusalem, 1962);J.D. Eisenstein, ed., Otzar Midrashim. A Library if Two Hundred Minor Midrashim, J- J/ (N ew York, 1915; repr. 1969); G. Friedlander, trans., Pirke De Rabbi Eliezer. The Chapters if Rabbi Eliezer the Great (New Yark, 1981); A. Jellinek, comp. and ed., Bet Ha• Midrasch. Sammlung Kleiner Midraschim und Vermischter Abhandlungen aus der AltemJildischen Literatur, 6 Vols. in 2 Pts. (Jerusalem, 1967); S. Lieberman, ed., Midrash Devarim Rabbah, Ed.from the Oiford Ms. No. 147. (Jerusalem, 1974); B. Mandelbaum, Pesikta de-Rav Kahana (New York, 1962); M. Margulies, ed., Midrash Vayyikra Rabbah (New York and Jerusalem, 1993); Midrash Rabbah (Vilna, 1887; repr. Jerusalem, 1961); Y. Theodor and H. Albeck, Midrash Bereshit Rabba mit kritischem Apparat und Kommentar Oerusalem, 1962); R. Ulmer, A Synoptic Edition if Pesiqta Rabbati Based Upon All Extant Manuscripts and the Editio Princeps (Atlanta, 1997-1999); H. Zundel, ed., Midrash Tanhuma. [Tanhuma, Printed Ed.] (Jerusalem, repr. 1973/74). Pesikta Rabbati serves as the matrix for my inquiry. 5 In this group I have checked the following Rabbinic works: MidrashJonah, Midreshe Yehudit, Midrash Haserot Viyterot; Midrash Va-yosha'; Midrash 'Eser Galuyot, Megillat Antiochus, Midrash Hallel, Petirat Aharon, Aggadat Bereshit, Pesikta Hadta, Midrash Konen, Petirat Moshe, Midrash Temurah, Divrei ha• yamim shel Moshe, , Midrash Va-yisa'u, Gen. Zutta, Midrash Proverbs, Midrash .