Butter Creek Watershed Analysis
United States Department of Agriculture Hayfork Ranger District Forest Service Shasta-Trinity National Forests Klamath Province Pacific Southwest Region COVER:
This image, viewed from the northwest, is a 10 meter panchromatic SPOT image draped over a 3D Digital Elevation Model of the Butter Creek Watershed. The viewing angle is approximately 30°. Executive Summary
The intent of Watershed Analysis is to develop ment emphasis guidelines, this document further and document a scientifically based understand- focuses on the desired watershed conditions which ing of the processes and interactions occurring the Forest Service would manage towards attain- within a watershed. This understanding, which ment in 50 to 100 years. The document addresses focuses on specific issues, values, and uses the team’s key findings and management recom- within the watershed, is essential for making mendations for implementation aimed at restoring sound management decisions. Watershed Analy- the Butter Creek watershed to ecological function sis thus provides the opportunity to restore, as a resilient, sustainable ecosystem. protect and sustain natural ecosystems by achiev- More specifically, Chapter I is primarily devoted to ing an acceptable balance between commodity a description of the current environmental and production and sound biological sustenance within social conditions existing within the confines of the a watershed (USDA FS, USDI BLM, 1994b). Butter Creek Watershed. The chapter also In early 1994, the Shasta-Trinity National Forests contains, where appropriate, discussions of the identified the Butter Creek watershed of the South watershed’s potential conditions, e.g., carrying Fork Trinity River basin, a Key Watershed, as its capacities, capabilities and potential natural “pilot” area for watershed analysis. Forest Ser- communities of vegetation. Included are natural vice and other agency personnel were organized disturbance events and regimes, processes, into an interdisciplinary team with the purpose of human influences and human values. Finally, analyzing, documenting, and publishing a scien- there is a list of the Key Questions developed for tific analysis concerning the complex inter-rela- the Butter Creek ecosystem. The Key Questions tionships between the geology, soils, hydrology, were formulated utilizing an interdisciplinary fisheries and wildlife, landscape ecology, vegeta- process and drive the Watershed Analysis. tion communities, natural disturbance processes Chapter II of the Butter Creek Ecosystem Story (fires, floods, earthquakes, forest insects and describes the distribution, type and relative pathogens) and human values within the Butter importance of environmental processes. In- Creek watershed. cluded is a description of the landscape and the The combined efforts of this interdisciplinary team mechanisms by which environmental changes has culminated in this publication which ad- have occurred over time. Land use activities dresses the eight step process outlined in “A which have generated change are examined for Federal Guide for Pilot Watershed Analysis” magnitude and trend. (FEMAT, 1994). The Butter Creek Watershed This chapter attempts to define the natural range of Analysis summarizes the accumulation of years of variability for the different resources and pro- field data and personal knowledge into a single cesses. The strategy of this Watershed Analysis is document designed to assist the local line officer to first determine the natural range of variability and (District Ranger) in appropriately managing the then assess current status of the key elements. natural resources of the watershed to not only From these, recommendations are provided for renew and sustain its ecological functions, but restoration where current conditions are not within also for the enjoyment and use by the neighboring natural ranges and maintenance where they are. human populace. Since natural disturbance regimes are the most Briefly, this document captures information on the important causal agents in variability of characteris- current conditions of the watershed while exploring tics of key ecological elements, an understanding through time an indepth review and analysis of the of their timing, spatial patterns and magnitude is natural variability and disturbance regimes affecting essential to the analysis. or impacting the ecosystem functioning and well- This chapter describes natural disturbance re- being of the Butter Creek watershed. Based on the gimes operating in the Butter Creek watershed subjective knowledge of the team’s professionals and ranges of variability for key elements through and current Forest Service ecosystem manage-
I time, from the formation of the Klamath Mountains Desired Future Conditions; the third part is a to the present. The reliability, applicability and narrative description of the future conditions and precision of the information to Butter Creek in- trends the team anticipated to occur. creases in the time periods nearest to the present. Chapter IV captures the essence of the analysis. The Native American Age provides a glimpse of The intent of the first section of this chapter is to natural ranges that reflect low levels of human integrate the recommendations which were made in caused disturbance in a climatic regime similar to this chapter, and to define specifically what prac- that of today. tices, analyses and activities should occur and Four different time-frames were evaluated and are where they should be performed. This section is discussed in this chapter. These include the meant to be the “core” recommendations of the Geologic Age (400 million years before present to team. The second objective of this chapter is to 10,000 years before present), the Native American present Key Findings. These findings have already Age (10,000 years ago to 1840), the European been presented in the previous chapters, however Settlement Age (1840 to 1950) and the Modern we wanted to highlight what we believed were the Age (1950 to 1994). key outcomes of this Watershed Analysis. A third objective is to identify areas of concern and to Chapter III is written in three parts: the first part a make recommendations for site analysis, project description of beneficial uses and values, including initiation and locations needing treatment. The final present condition in relationship to associated objective of the chapter is to document non-resolv- values and uses, the second part is a listing of able key questions and to discuss data gaps.
II Butter Creek Interagency/Interdisciplinary Team
Interdisciplinary Team: Karyn Wood...... District Ranger, Hayfork Ranger District Don Haskins ...... Team Leader, Writer/Editor, Forest Geologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Sheila Logan ...... Terrestrial Group Leader, Editor, Zone Ecologist, Mendocino and Shasta-Trinity National Forests
Darrel Ranken ...... Aquatic Group Leader, Forest Hydrologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests
Core Team: Jane Bardolf ...... District Biologist, Hayfork Ranger District Maria Boroja ...... Wildlife Biologist, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Field Office Bill Brock ...... Fisheries Biologist, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Trinity River Basin Field Office Sherry Chilcott ...... District Archaeologist, Hayfork Ranger District Paula Crumpton ...... Forest Wildlife Biologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Yvonne Everett ...... Landscape Ecologist, U.C. Berkeley Ann Garland ...... Deputy Fire Management Officer, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Richard Iri arry ...... Forest Fisheries Biologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Jim Komar ...... Soil Conservationist, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Weaverville Field Office Bob Mobley ...... Information Systems Management, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Ken Smith ...... Writer/Editor, Resource Officer, Shasta Lake Ranger District Mark Stevens ...... Transportation Planner, Trinity Zone, Engineering
John Veevaert ...... District Hydrologist, Big Bar and Weaverville Ranger Districts
Extended Team: Patty Aberg ...... GIS Analyst, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Paula Anderson ...... Ecologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Dan Angello ...... Planning Forester, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Anna Arnold ...... Planning Officer, Hayfork Ranger District Richard Baron ...... GIS Analyst, VESTRA Resources, Inc. Melinda Carlson ...... Ecologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Gary Chase ...... Hydrologic Technician, Graphics and Desktop Publishing, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Ann Chrisney ...... Wildlife Biologist, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Field Office Bill Clark ...... Fuels Specialist, Hayfork Ranger District George Cru ...... District Hydrologist, Yolla Bolla Ranger District Gregg DeNitto ...... Pathologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Heidi Dias ...... Wildlife Biologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Jan Fox ...... GIS Analyst, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Michelle Gilroy ...... Fisheries Biologist, Hayfork Ranger District Karol McGuire ...... GIS Analyst, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Julie Nelson ...... Forest Botanist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Sue Pappalardo ...... Botanist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Vivian Parker ...... Botanist, Final Edits, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Dave Schult ...... Entomologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Wayne Steffes ...... Civil Engineer, Shasta-Trinity National Forests Rich Teixeira ...... Minerals Geologist, Klamath Province, USDA Forest Service
III Dedication
As we come to the end of this long and bittersweet journey, the Butter Creek Team dedicates our work to three friends who made our road less rocky and our journey more enjoyable:
To Bill Shands, our mentor, who taught us to build a bridge of trust with the community,
To Sharon Lingemann, our friend, whose honesty, enthusiasm and eagerness to learn was an inspiration, and
To Ken (Snuffy) Smith, our colleague, who good naturedly kept us organized and on-target.
V Watershed Analysis is an iterative process which never ends. Therefore, it must be emphasized that this is a dynamic document. Some sections of the document are relatively brief and somewhat incomplete compared to other sections. As more informa- tion becomes available, and if there is a need, those sections will be updated.
VII Table of Contents
Butter Creek Ecosystem Story ...... 1
Introduction ...... 1
Background ...... 1
What is Watershed Analysis? ...... 2
Land Allocation, Management Prescriptions and Land Designations ...... 3
Public Involvement ...... 4
Watershed Analysis Process ...... 5
Chapter I - Current Conditions ...... 9
Geographic Setting ...... 9
The Physical and Aquatic Environment ...... 11 Air Quality ...... 11
Geology ...... 11 Bedrock and Surficial Geology ...... 11 Geomorphology ...... 12 Slope Stability Hazards ...... 13 Seismic Hazards ...... 15 Mineral Resources ...... 16 Soils ...... 17 Soils of the Butter Creek Watershed ...... 17 Surface Erosion Hazards ...... 21 Hydrology ...... 21 Climate ...... 21 Channel Types and Stream Conditions...... 22 Water Quality and Quantity...... 23 Fisheries ...... 28 The Butter Creek Setting ...... 28 Anadromous and Resident Fish Habitat...... 29 Anadromous Fish Stocks at Risk...... 29 Juvenile Steelhead Densities ...... 30 Other Fish Stocks ...... 30 The Terrestrial Biological Environment ...... 31 Vegetation...... 31 Landscape Ecology ...... 31
IX Table of Contents (continued)
Plant Communities ...... 31 Potential Natural Terrestrial Vegetation Communities ...... 32 Riparian Vegetation Communities ...... 34 Riparian Condition ...... 35 Plant Species of Concern ...... 36 Sensitive and Endemic Plants ...... 36 Noxious weeds and exotic pest plants ...... 38 Natural Disturbance Regimes ...... 38 Fire Regimes...... 38 Fire History ...... 39 Effects of Fire Exclusion ...... 40 The Effects of Fire on Vegetation ...... 41 Forest Health ...... 44 Forest Insects ...... 44 Forest Pathogens ...... 44 Stand Density Induced Effects ...... 45 Plantation Health ...... 46 Wildlife Populations ...... 46 Species of Special Concern ...... 46 Wildlife Habitat ...... 48 Analytical Framework ...... 48 Biological Corridors...... 50 The Human Dimension ...... 51 Human Values ...... 51 Contemporary Human Values ...... 51 Prehistoric and Historic Values...... 52 Recreation ...... 52 Aesthetics ...... 53 Commodities and Economics ...... 53 The Human Imprint...... 54 Timber Harvest ...... 54 Transportation ...... 54 Livestock Grazing ...... 55 Issues for the Butter Creek Watershed ...... 57 South Fork of the Trinity River Issues ...... 57
Butter Creek Issues ...... 57
Key Questions for Analysis ...... 59 Geology ...... 59
Soils ...... 59
Climate and Hydrology ...... 59 Water Quality ...... 59
X Table of Contents (continued)
Channel Conditions ...... 60
Cumulative Watershed Effects ...... 60
Fisheries ...... 60 Anadromous Fish Populations...... 60 Anadromous Fish Habitat ...... 60 Resident Fish Populations ...... 61 Resident Fish Habitat ...... 61 Vegetation and Plant Species of Concern...... 61
Fauna ...... 61
Prehistoric and Historic Human Values and Uses...... 61
Contemporary Human Values ...... 62
Timber Harvest ...... 62
Special Forest Products ...... 62
Transportation System ...... 62
Fire and Fuels ...... 62
Chapter II - Natural Range of Variability and Disturbance Regimes ...... 63
The Geologic Age 400 million to 10,000 Years Before Present ...... 65
The Native American Age 10,000 Years Before Present to 1840 ...... 69
Prehistoric/Historic Values and Uses ...... 69 Fire Regimes...... 71 Geology ...... 72
Soils Resource ...... 72
Hydrology ...... 73
Vegetation ...... 73
XI Table of Contents (continued)
European Settlement Age 1840 to 1950 ...... 75
Historic Values and Uses ...... 75 The Physical and Aquatic Environment...... 82 The Terrestrial and Riparian Systems ...... 83 Vegetative Conditions - 1944 ...... 84 Fire History ...... 86 The Modern Age 1950 to 1994 ...... 87
Introduction ...... 87
Disturbance Events ...... 87 The 1950s ...... 87
The 1960s ...... 88
Timber Harvest ...... 88
The 1964 Flood ...... 90
The 1970s ...... 93
The 1980s ...... 94
The 1987 Fires ...... 94 Burned-Area Emergency Rehabilitation ...... 96 Salvage Harvest ...... 97 Effects of Fire and Salvage Activities ...... 97 The 1990s ...... 98
Analysis - 1950 to 1990 ...... 98 Physical Environment ...... 98
Fisheries ...... 99
Vegetation Patterns ...... 102 Land Management Plan Timber Stratum Analysis ...... 102 Ecological Seral Stage Analysis ...... 104 Plant Species of Concern ...... 105 Wildlife Habitat Conditions ...... 106
XII Table of Contents (continued)
Chapter III - Desired Future Conditions ...... 109
Beneficial Uses ...... 109 Fish Species Present in the South Fork Trinity River Basin ...... 109
Domestic Water Uses...... 109
Desired Future Conditions ...... 109 Land Management Plan Desired Future Condition ...... 110
Desired Future Conditions Developed with the Public ...... 111
Watershed Analysis Team Desired Future Conditions...... 112
A Vision of the Future - 1994 to the Future ...... 114 Geology ...... 114
Soils Resource ...... 115
Hydrology ...... 115
Fisheries ...... 117
Vegetation ...... 118
Wildlife ...... 118
Transportation ...... 119
Human Values ...... 119
Fuels Management ...... 119
Forest Products and Commodities ...... 120 Timber Harvest ...... 120 Special Forest Products...... 120 Livestock Grazing ...... 120 Chapter IV - Interpretation, Key Findings and Management Recommendations ...... 121
Integrated Summary of Recommendations ...... 121
Transportation Planning ...... 121
Fuels ...... 122
Forest Health ...... 123
Sediment and Peak Streamflow Reduction ...... 124
XIII Table of Contents (continued)
Late Seral Wildlife Habitat ...... 125
Social and Economic Considerations ...... 125
Riparian Restoration ...... 127
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration ...... 128
Key Findings and Recommendations ...... 129
General Planning ...... 129 Forest Health ...... 129
Fire Suppression ...... 130
Special Forest Products ...... 131
Landscape Diversity and Vegetation Patterns ...... 131
Biological Diversity ...... 132
Late Successional Reserves and Riparian Reserves (wildlife) ...... 133
Historic and Prehistoric Human Values ...... 133
Contemporary Human Values ...... 133
Riparian Reserves ...... 134
Transportation Planning ...... 139
Cumulative Watershed Effects ...... 141
Ecosystem Restoration ...... 145
Aquatic Restoration ...... 145
Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration ...... 153
Fuels Treatments ...... 155
Wetlands Wildlife Habitat Restoration ...... 156
Biological Diversity ...... 156
Monitoring ...... 157
Streams and Water Quality ...... 157
Fish Habitat and Populations ...... 159
Vegetation ...... 160
XIV Table of Contents (continued)
Wildlife Habitat and Populations ...... 160
Fuels ...... 161
Unresolvable Key Questions ...... 161
Bibliography...... 165
Glossary ...... 175
Appendix A - Inventories utilized in Analysis
Appendix B - Description of Riparian Vegetation Communities
Appendix C - Current Wildlife Diversity by Habitat Type and Guild
Appendix D - Acres of Wildlife Habitat Relationship Types
Appendix E - Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Species Analysis
Appendix F - Late Successional Reserve Assessment
Appendix G - Integrated Vegetation Management Plan
XV List of Figures
Chapter I Figure 1 ...... Location Map ...... I-9 Figure 2 ...... Comparative Histogram - Slope Classes ...... I-11 Figure 3 ...... Geologic Map of Klamath Mountains ...... I-12 Figure 4 ...... Comparative Histogram - Mass Wasting Hazards ...... I-16 Figure 5 ...... Comparative Histogram - Erosion Hazard Rating ...... I-22 Figure 6 ...... Drainage Density by Subwatershed ...... I-23
XVII List of Tables
Chapter I Table 1 ...... Acres by Subwatershed ...... I-10 Table 2 ...... Butter Creek Geomorphic Map Units ...... I-14 Table 3 ...... Acres by Slope Stability Hazard ...... I-15 Table 4 ...... Soil Series and Interpretations ...... I-18 Table 5 ...... Butter Creek Soil Mapping Units ...... I-19 Table 6 ...... Total Percent ERA by Subwatersheds...... I-26 Table 7 ...... Acres of Plantations by Subwatershed ...... I-27 Table 8 ...... Miles of Road and Road Density by Subwatershed ...... I-27 Table 9 ...... 1990 Timber Stratum - Vegetation Types ...... I-31 Table 10...... 1990 Ecological Seral Stage Distribution...... I-32 Table 11...... Fire History ...... I-40 Table 12...... 1990 Wildlife Habitat Relations (WHR) Types ...... I-48
Chapter II Table 13...... Acres of Plantations ...... II-80 Table 14...... Total ERA Percent by Subwatershed and Decade ...... II-81 Table 15...... 1944 Ecological Seral Stage Distribution...... II-84 Table 16...... 1944 Timber Stratum - Vegetation Type ...... II-84 Table 17...... 1944 Timber Stratum - Density ...... II-85 Table 18...... 1944 Timber Stratum - Size Class ...... II-85 Table 19...... Fish Count of Spring-Run Chinook and Summer Steelhead ...... II-100 Table 20...... 1990 Timber Stratum - Density ...... II-103 Table 21...... 1990 Timber Stratum - Size Class ...... II-103 Table 22...... 1944 Wildlife Habitat Relations (WHR) Types ...... II-106
Chapter IV Table 23...... Transportation System Recommendations ...... IV-122 Table 24...... Fuels Recommendations ...... IV-123 Table 25...... Forest Health Recommendations ...... IV-124 Table 26...... Sediment and Peak Streamflow Reduction Recommendations ...... IV-125 Table 27...... Late Seral Wildlife Habitat Recommendations ...... IV-125 Table 28...... Social and Economic Considerations Recommendations...... IV-126 Table 29...... Riparian Restoration Recommendations ...... IV-127 Table 30...... Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration Recommendations ...... IV-128 Table 31...... Acres of Riparian Reserves...... IV-138
XVIII List of Plates
Chapter I Plate 1 ...... Subwatershed Map Plate 2 ...... Elevation Map Plate 3 ...... Slope Map Plate 4 ...... Lithology Map Plate 5 ...... Mass Wasting Features Plate 6 ...... Slope Stability Hazards Plate 7 ...... Site Productivity Plate 8 ...... Surface Erosion Hazard Map Plate 9 ...... Stream Map - Flow Regimes Plate 10 ...... Range of Anadromous and Resident Fisheries Plate 11 ...... 1990 Timber Stratum Vegetation Type Map Plate 12 ...... 1990 Ecological Seral Stage Map Plate 13 ...... Potential Natural Community Series Map Plate 14 ...... Fire History Map Plate 15 ...... Late Seral Reserve and Critical Habitat Unit Map Plate 16 ...... Wildlife Habitat Relations Type Map 1990 Plate 17 ...... Corridor Map Plate 18 ...... Plantations by Decade Map Plate 19 ...... Selective Harvest Map Plate 20 ...... Transportation System Map
Chapter II Plate 21 ...... 1944 Grouped Ecological Seral Stage Map Plate 22 ...... 1944 Timber Stratum - Vegetation Type Map Plate 23 ...... 1944 Timber Stratum - Density Map Plate 24 ...... 1944 Timber Stratum - Size Class Map Plate 25 ...... 1990 Timber Stratum - Density Map Plate 26 ...... 1990 Timber Stratum - Size Class Map Plate 27 ...... 1990 Grouped Seral Stage Map Plate 28 ...... Wildlife Habitat Relations Type Map 1944
Chapter IV Plate 29 ...... Riparian Reserves
XIX Butter Creek Ecosystem Story
Introduction Lateral, longitudinal and drainage network connections include floodplains, wetlands, The intent of this report is to document a Water- upslope areas, headwater tributaries and shed Analysis performed by an interagency, intact refugia. These network connections interdisciplinary team of scientists for the Butter must provide chemically and physically Creek Watershed, located on the Hayfork Ranger unobstructed routes to areas critical for District, in the Shasta-Trinity National Forests. fulfilling life history requirements of aquatic and riparian-dependent species.
Background 3. Maintain and restore the physical integrity of In April 1993, President Clinton commissioned an the aquatic system, including shorelines, interagency scientific team to develop a set of banks and bottom configurations. alternatives for management of ecosystems within 4. Maintain and restore water quality necessary the range of the northern spotted owl. This effort to support healthy riparian, aquatic and culminated in the report by the Forest Ecosystem wetland ecosystems. Water quality must Management Assessment Team (FEMAT) en- remain within the range that maintains the titled: “Forest Ecosystem Management: An Eco- biological, physical and chemical integrity of logical, Economic, and Social Assessment”, in the system and benefits survival, growth, July 1993 (Thomas, 1993). reproduction and migration of individuals The FEMAT report was utilized as a cornerstone composing aquatic and riparian communities. in the development of the Final Supplemental 5. Maintain and restore the sediment regime Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) for under which aquatic ecosystems evolved. “Amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents Within Elements of the sediment regime include the the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl”. The timing, volume, rate and character of sedi- Record of Decision (ROD) for this FSEIS was ment input, storage and transport. signed in April, 1994 (USDA Forest Service and 6. Maintain and restore in-stream flows suffi- USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1994b). cient to create and maintain riparian, aquatic Due to accelerating concerns about declining fish and wetland habitats and to retain patterns populations, protection and improvement of aquatic of sediment, nutrient and wood routing. The and riparian ecosystems are key components of timing, magnitude, duration and spatial the FEMAT report. The report presents a broad distribution of peak, high and low flows must strategy for maintaining or restoring the distribution, be protected. diversity and complexity of watershed and land- 7. Maintain and restore the timing, variability scape-scale processes and characteristics. and duration of floodplain inundation and A significant part of the President’s Plan is the water table elevation in meadows and Aquatic Conservation Strategy. As defined in the wetlands. ROD, there are nine objectives for the Aquatic 8. Maintain and restore the species composi- Conservation Strategy: tion and structural diversity of plant commu- 1. Maintain and restore the distribution, diver- nities in riparian areas and wetlands to sity and complexity of watershed and provide adequate summer and winter landscape-scale features to ensure protec- thermal regulation, nutrient filtering, appro- tion of the aquatic systems to which spe- priate rates of surface erosion, bank erosion cies, populations and communities are and channel migration and to supply uniquely adapted. amounts and distributions of course woody debris sufficient to sustain physical com- 2. Maintain and restore spatial and temporal plexity and stability. connectivity within and between watersheds.
1 Introduction
9. Maintain and restore habitat to support well- Four Key Watersheds have been designated by distributed populations of native plant, inverte- the ROD on the Shasta-Trinity National Forests. brate and vertebrate riparian-dependent They are: 1) New River; 2) North Fork Trinity species. River; 3) Canyon Creek; and 4) South Fork Trinity River, upstream from the confluence with Hayfork There are four components of the Aquatic Con- Creek. The Butter Creek watershed lies within the servation Strategy: Watershed Analysis, Riparian South Fork Trinity River Key Watershed. Reserves, Watershed Restoration and Key Watersheds. Watershed Analysis, as presented by the FEMAT scientists, has a broad, ecosystem management 1. Riparian Reserves: Lands along streams context. The concept of Watershed Analysis is and unstable and potentially unstable areas embodied in the FEMAT philosophy. It is also where special standards and guidelines required before new management activities can direct land use. take place in specific land allocations identified in 2. Key Watersheds: A system of large refugia FEMAT. These include Key Watersheds, Riparian comprising watersheds which are crucial to Reserves and Released Roadless Areas. Water- at-risk fish species and stocks and provide shed analysis is a cornerstone for implementation high quality water. of the FEMAT philosophy.
3. Watershed Analysis: Procedures for conducting analysis that evaluates geomor- What is Watershed Analysis? phic and ecological processes operating in The FEMAT scientists drafted a reference for specific watersheds. This analysis should Watershed Analysis, “A Federal Guide for Pilot enable watershed planning that achieves Watershed Analysis” (FEMAT, 1994), to be used Aquatic Conservation Strategy objectives. for the initial wave of Watershed Analyses. Their Watershed analysis provides the basis for intent is to use the procedure for the first “pilot” monitoring and restoration programs and the Watershed Analyses, then based on reviews of the foundation from which Riparian Reserves Watershed Analyses, revise the guide as needed. can be delineated. The Watershed Analysis process is used to 4. Watershed Restoration: A comprehensive, develop and document a scientifically based long-term program of watershed restoration understanding of the processes, functions and to restore watershed health and aquatic interactions occurring within a watershed in both ecosystems, including the habitats support- terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. This under- ing fish and other aquatic and riparian- standing, which focuses on specific issues, values dependent organisms. and uses within the watershed, is essential for “Key Watersheds...serve as a system of areas to making sound management decisions. Protecting be managed to provide high quality habitat for at- beneficial uses, such as those identified by the risk anadromous fish stocks, bull trout and resi- States in water quality standards and criteria dent fish species. Key Watershed designation under the Federal Clean Water Act, is a funda- does not preclude regularly scheduled timber mental motivation for Watershed Analysis. Be- harvest and other activities. However, Watershed cause of the linkages between headwater areas, Analysis is required in these areas before any valley floors and downstream users, watershed management activities can take place and the analyses should encompass the entire watershed; results of the analysis must be incorporated into from the highest ridge to the mouth of the trunk the decision-making process. The exception is: in river and include all ownerships. the short term and until Watershed Analysis can There is mandate for federal land managers to be completed, minor activities such as those that analyze and manage ecosystems. Over the last 3 would be categorically excluded under the NEPA years, the Forest Service has moved toward an regulations (except timber harvest) may proceed, ecological approach to land management, includ- consistent with Riparian Reserve standards and ing all components and species, in order to protect guidelines.” These are documented on pages C- and sustain the natural systems that society 31-38 of the ROD. depends on. To do this requires an understanding
2 Introduction of how the requirements of various species over- use this collective information to decide on a lap and affect one another in an area before course of action for the watershed. development of a management strategy for eco- system sustainability. Watershed Analysis pro- Land Allocation, Management vides a vehicle to efficiently identify and balance multi-species concerns. This requires an under- Prescriptions and Land Designations standing of the interactions between land-use The Record of Decision (USDA Forest Service and activities, natural disturbance regimes and the USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1994b) biological, physical and social processes and provided for a total of seven land allocation cat- conditions within an area. Developing this under- egories: Congressionally Reserved Areas, Late standing is the essence of Watershed Analysis. Successional Reserves, Adaptive Management Watershed analysis is an intermediate analysis Areas, Managed Late Successional Areas, Admin- between land management planning and project istratively Withdrawn Areas, Riparian Reserves planning. Given the Desired Future Conditions, and Matrix Lands. Four of these land categories goals and objectives, management area bound- are found within the Butter Creek watershed. aries, and standards and guidelines from Forest They are as follows: Plans, Watershed Analysis identifies and provides Late Successional Reserves (LSR), in combi- recommendations and the scientific basis for nation with the other allocations and standards implementing Forest Plans. The results of the and guidelines, will maintain a functional, Watershed Analysis may show that a forest plan interactive, late-successional and old-growth amendment is necessary. When this is the case, forest ecosystem. They are designed to serve and the Forest Supervisor decides to proceed with as habitat for late-successional and old-growth a plan amendment, the Watershed Analysis may related species including the northern spotted be used to support the NEPA analysis for the owl. There are 8,115 acres of the South Fork amendment (USDA, Forest Service, 1994i). LSR within the Butter Creek watershed.
Watershed Analysis is not a decision process in The Adaptive Management Area is designed that it does not produce a formal decision notice or to develop, test and monitor new management record of decision as required by the National approaches to integrate and achieve ecologi- Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Watershed cal, economic and other social and community Analysis is an intermediate level of analysis which objectives. A 900 acre portion of the Hayfork derives information from larger scale plans (River AMA lies within the Butter Creek watershed. Basin, Provincial, Forest, District) and which provides information to smaller scale site analy- The Riparian Reserves are areas along all ses, both of which are formal decision points streams, wetlands, ponds, lakes and unstable under NEPA. Watershed analyses will also or potentially unstable areas where the conser- provide information to river basin planning and vation of aquatic and riparian-dependent receive information from site analyses. terrestrial resources receives primary empha- sis. The purpose of the reserves is to protect Watershed Analysis, and the resultant documenta- the health of the aquatic and riparian systems tion of that analysis, is one of several tools the and dependent species. The reserves also local line officer (Forest Supervisor or District provide incidental benefits to upland plant Ranger) will utilize in making management deci- communities and wildlife species. The areal sions about the watershed and selecting projects extent of the Riparian Reserve will be analyzed to implement in the watershed to achieve Desired through Watershed Analysis. Future Conditions. Watershed analyses are never finished. They are iterative analyses which in Matrix lands are all federal lands remaining addition to providing the line officer with results of outside of the other six land allocation catego- analyses and recommendations for land manage- ries. It is also the area in which most timber ment activities, also document what is known and harvest and other silvicultural activities may not known about the watershed. As additional occur. However, the designation of Key Water- information becomes available, it is added to the shed, as an umbrella land management empha- Watershed Analysis file. The line officer can then sis over the entire Butter Creek watershed,
3 Introduction
provides for the prioritization of watershed For consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife restoration activities over all others. Activities Service, suitable habitat is analyzed by two which do not contribute to a healthy watershed concentric circles around northern spotted owl are not emphasized. It is foreseen that timber activity centers. The inner circle, or territory, is harvest and silvicultural activities may be used a 0.7 mile radius from the activity center. The as tools for accomplishing watershed restora- outer circle, or home range, is a 1.3 mile radius tion and maintaining healthy forests within the from the activity center. watershed, but harvest activities will not be driven solely by the desire for commodity Public Involvement outputs. There are over 13,450 acres of Matrix Lands within the Butter Creek watershed. Awareness of the full range of values, resource needs, and public expectations associated with the Under the draft Forest Plan (USDA Forest Butter Creek watershed is fundamental to the Service, 1993b), the following land manage- analysis. This full range is achieved by interacting ment prescriptions lie within the Matrix Lands in with those in the agency and outside the agency the Butter Creek watershed: Riparian Manage- who might have an interest or knowledge about ment, Wildlife Management and Commercial the resources of the watershed. Wood Products Emphasis. In the case of the Butter Creek watershed, the need The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated for a watershed-based, ecosystem management critical habitat for the northern spotted owl on strategy was recognized and an analysis started August 13, 1991 in a Final Rule published in long before the Watershed Analysis process the Federal Register. More recently, the U.S. documented here was even formulated. As a Fish and Wildlife Service, USDA Forest Ser- result, extensive and intensive sensing has already vice, along with many other agencies, worked occurred and is incorporated into this analysis. together to amend USDA Forest Service planning documents within the range of the Public involvement was initiated with a public northern spotted owl. The Record of Decision meeting which was held in July, 1993. Public (USDA FS and USDI BLM, 1994b) includes this involvement has continued with: collaborative work to implement new land Public meetings and open houses to provide allocations, standards and guidelines. information exchange With the Late Successional Reserve allocations Smaller groups, empowered by the group at in the ROD, many critical habitat units became large meeting to work on specific problems part of LSRs. However, some critical habitat units did not evolve into LSRs. New consulta- Field trips to view and discuss resources, tion procedures for the northern spotted owl are management issues and potential treatments currently being developed to become consis- and projects tent with the ROD. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service may revise the need for critical habitat Minutes of meetings sent out to interested units following the implementation of the parties Recovery Plan for the northern spotted owl. Consultant Bill Shands, of the Pinchot However, critical habitat units are currently in Institute for Conservation, providing assis- place because they remain recognized by the tance in consensus management with the Final Rule, as published in August, 1991, in the local public group. Federal Register. The concerns and interests of the various public A portion of a Critical Habitat Unit is located in groups and government agencies have been the eastern portion of the Butter Creek water- utilized in formulating the Desired Conditions and shed. It was established for dispersal, or Key Questions. A complete listing of all the input connectivity, for the northern spotted owl, is available in the analysis file at the Hayfork rather than for nesting, roosting, or foraging. It Ranger District office. comprises approximately 3000 acres within the Butter Creek Watershed, located primarily within Matrix Lands and Riparian Reserves.
4 Introduction Watershed Analysis Process The Butter Creek Watershed Analysis team utilized an eight step process which is described Watershed Analysis addresses a broad range of below. These steps are described in detail in “A landscape processes, both terrestrial and aquatic. Federal Agency Guide for Pilot Watershed Analy- Many sophisticated techniques are necessary to sis”, (FEMAT, 1994). The following step descrip- adequately complete the task requiring a highly tions include the purpose of the step, the process skilled team. This Watershed Analysis was that was utilized, and where in this document the carried out by an interagency interdisciplinary information developed in the step may be found. team of resource professionals who are familiar with the Butter Creek watershed. The process depended strongly on interdisciplinary cooperation at each step to keep the analysis focused on Step 1: Identify Issues, Describe relevant issues and to ensure that the work was Desired Future Conditions, neither overly detailed nor vague. Formulate Key Questions Watershed Analysis is an iterative process. During the Butter Creek Watershed Analysis, as The purpose of this step is to focus Watershed new data became available or new issues sur- Analysis on the important questions, so that efforts faced, the team looped back to previously com- are concentrated on the processes and functions pleted steps to incorporate the new information most directly related to Desired Future Conditions before proceeding. Often two or more steps were and the values and uses of people. The Issues and being worked on concurrently or later steps were Key Questions are identified at the end of Chapter completed before early ones because the informa- I, the Desired Future Conditions in Chapter III. tion or skills were more readily available. Fre- The important issues, values and uses were quent team meetings, including several team site framed based on the entire watershed. The issues visits, were held to ensure coordination and and values are a combination of river basin issues, consistency and to promote interdisciplinary and specialists’ familiarity with the watershed, existing interagency analysis. documentation, public involvement and current Watershed Analysis is also an evolving process. land use patterns. The Watershed Analysis for Butter Creek, as Preliminary Desired Future Condition statements documented herein, will be amended or replaced were then developed to describe the future condi- as new information becomes available, is ana- tions that are to be achieved. These DFCs lead to lyzed, and provides significant new insight into the a set of Key Questions. These are the questions processes and interactions occurring within the that Watershed Analysis will attempt to answer— watershed. The “new information” which might the team’s expectations for the analysis. cause the need for a re-analysis could be: