DOCSLIB.ORG

Fo#371/121779

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

cms PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE ins 1 Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the Public Record Office's terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright restrictions. Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply of Public Records' leaflet r V The Israel Ambassador called on me this afternoon. He said that he would be carrying a stage further the conversation which he had had with the Minister of State f* a/f*.Xi»lJ-^on September 15. As he had told Mr. Nutting, the Israeli V •fe- Government deeply resented the condemnation by the / Foreign Office spokesman of Israel's action near Dha Hiriye, which was described as contrary to the assurances given by Israel to the Secretary-General of the o United Nations. This statement was regarded as grossly partial and as an unfriendly act, anticipating as it did . 'VA*** the findings of the Mixed Armistice Commission. These findings had now been published on September 17. The Commission condemned Jordan for the killing of the six Israel soldiers which had given rise to the Israeli action. The Israel Government now expected H.M.G. in all fairness to condemn Jordan. There was an additional reason. The Israel Government feared that we were trying to appease the Arabs at Israel's expense, a situation which they were not' prepared to accept. 2. I took note of the Ambassador's request, saying that he would not expect me to give him an immediate reply. I asked him, however, to consider whether a statement condemnatory to Jordan was likely to improve our chances of restraining Jordan, as he knew we were trying to do. Mr. Elath retorted, as usual, that our efforts had no success. He repeated his remarks about appeasing the Arabs, adding that he believed that in condemning Israel last week we had our eye not on Amman but on Riyadh and Bagdad. To this I said that he credited us with too much subtlety. But if he really thought that we had acted /for Tl 21 cms PUBUC RECORD OFFICE "ins I 1 Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the Public Record Office's terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright restrictions. Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply of Public Records' leaflet for the reasons he gave I should have expected him to welcome the attempt to weaken Nasser's hold on the Arabs* The Ambassador replied that this might have been so if we had consulted Israel first and had explained that our policy was to strengthen Israel and to weaken her enemies. This naturally led him to refer yet again to Centurion tanks but fortunately he did not pursue the point* 3. In conclusion the Ambassador said that he assumed that we should be making a statement tomorrow and he asked that he should if possible be informed beforehand. I indicated that he must not make any assumptions* (A. D. M. Ross) Copies to: Sept ember 18, 1956* Mr* Hutting Private Secretary Levant Department African Department cms PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE ins I Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the Public Record Office's terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright restrictions. Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply of Public Records' leaflet r*\ ISRAEL - JORDAN INCIDENTS The Israeli Ambassador called on Mr. Ross yesterday continue his complaint that the Foreign Office statement out on September 13 about the Israel attack on a Jordan // rO ' , FLAG A \-w 'police post (P.O. telegram No. 758 to Tel Aviv) was grossly FLAG B partial and unfriendly. Mr. Ross's record of conversation is attached. 2. The Ambassador has deliberately confused two separate issues: (a) The frontier clash on September 10 in the course of which 6 Israeli soldiers were killed; and (b) The reprisal raid carried out by Israeli forces on the night of September 11/12, which resulted in the deaths of some 19 Jordanians and the complete destruction of the police post and nearby school. 3. It is quite true that the Mixed Armistice Commission pronounced on the first of these only on September 17. It condemned Jordan for the incident, and found that the bodies t p • /-.v* \of the Israel soldiers had been dragged across the demarcation FLAG C '"J line (Jerusalem telegram No. 327). The Foreign Office statement, however, made no reference whatsoever to this incident. 4. The statement referred solely to the Israeli reprisal raid of September 13/12. A United Nations Truce Supervision Organisation statement was made on September 12. This said that Israeli forces had crossed the demarcation line to attack the police post, and that this appeared as an act_pf_retaliation such as had been repeatedly condemned FLAG D "by the Security Council (Jerusalem telegram No. 320). ..-/x/ n i /Even v PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE "21 Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the Public Record Office's terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright restrictions. Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply of Public Records' leaflet Evenso the Foreign Office statement was careful to say that the incident was "being formally investigated "by General Burns,,, and "based, itself on "-oreliminary reports". 5. In continuing the complaint about this statement and in suggesting that we should now make one condemning Jordan for the September 10 incident, the Israelis seem to "be deliberately making, trouble. I suggest that the Minister of State summons the Israeli Ambassador and speaks to him Sigmly on the following lines: (a) The Foreign Office statement of September 13 made no reference whatsoever to the incident of September 10 for which Jordan was ID lamed "by the Mixed Armistice Commission on September 17. ("b) The statement referred solely to the Israeli reprisal raid of September 11/12, which the United Nations Truce Supervision Organisation had described in a statement issued on September 12 as an act of retaliation such as had been repeatedly condemned by the Security Council. (c) There is a complete difference between a frontier clash, such as that of September 10, and. a planned military operation against neighbouring territory, such as the Israeli raid of September 11/12. It is the deliberate natxire of reprisals, which, as the Ambassador will be well aware, H.M.G. have always condemned. (d) H.M.G. have no intention of issuing a statement abou ' the incident of September 10, Then fo>aiLi ***.t ^ X A ^ ., 4. „• • . H ^-S ,. r. -t nr, o ^ n p,^ ^ H.M.G. in fact noticed that the/Commission's Chairman ^ stated that, while Jordan must be held responsible /for the 1 2 cms PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE ins I 1 I 2 ™-Fb 3917 72? 774 U^X Please note that this copy is supplied subject to the Public Record Office's terms and conditions and that your use of it may be subject to copyright restrictions. Further information is given in the enclosed Terms and Conditions of supply of Public Records' leaflet for the incident, patrolling by the Israeli forces close to the demarcation line greatly contributed to increased tension. (e) H.M.G. are certainly not trying to appease the Arabs at Israel's expense. On the contrary they have repeatedly urged restraint on the Jordanians. On the other hand the deliberate destruction of Jordanian police posts will make the task of the Jordanian authorities in preventing infiltration into Israel harder. If this is the intention of the Israel Government H.lvl.G. would take a most serious view of it. (f) The Ambassador seems to be trying to make a major issue out of the Foreign Office statement of September 13. If he wants a fight he can have it. He will no doubt have been expecting that the result of the two recent reprisal ra43s will be the holding up of shipments of arms from this country. So far we have not done this. But if the Israelis are really out for trouble we shall have no option but to do so. (R. M. Hadow) September 19, 1956 CONFIDENTIAL FROM FOREIGN OFFICE TO TEL AVIV Cypher/DTP and FOREIGN OFFICE AMP By Bag DISTRIBUTION No. 790 D. 1.10 a.m. September 22, 1956 September 21, 1956 CONFIDENTIAL Addressed to Tel Aviv telegram No. 790 of. September 21. Repeated for Information to: Amman Jerusalem And Saving to: Beirut No. 8/2 Bagdad No. 582,. Cairo No. 857 Damascus No, 512 Washington No, 4319 Paris No. 3425 P.O.M.E.F. 1212 UKDEL New York No. 924 My telegram No, 774 [of September 17: Israel-Jordan situation]. The Israel Ambassador called on Mr. Ross on September 18 to continue the complaint made to the Minister of State about the alleged partiality of the Foreign Office statement of September 13 (my telegram No. 758). The Mixed Armistice Commission had on September 17 condemned Jordan for the killing of the six Israeli soldiers which had given rise to the Israeli action. The Israel Government now expected Her Majesty's Government to condemn Jordan for this incident. They also feared that we were trying to appease the Arabs at Israel's expense, which they were not prepared to accept, 2. The Minister of State summoned the Israel Ambassador again on September 20, He told him that Her Majesty's Government had considered the Israel Government's demand that they should condemn Jordan for the incident of September 10 but had decided against it.
Recommended publications
  • Engendering Relationship Between Jew and America

    Engendering Relationship Between Jew and America

    Oedipus' Sister: Narrating Gender and Nation in the Early Novels of Israeli Women by Hadar Makov-Hasson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Hebrew and Judaic Studies New York University September, 2009 ___________________________ Yael S. Feldman UMI Number: 3380280 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3380280 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 © Hadar Makov-Hasson All Rights Reserved, 2009 DEDICATION בדמי ימיה מתה אמי , וכבת ששים שש שנה הייתה במותה This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of my mother Nira Makov. Her love, intellectual curiosity, and courage are engraved on my heart forever. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation would have never been written without the help and support of several people to whom I am extremely grateful. First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor, Professor Yael Feldman, whose pioneering work on the foremothers of Hebrew literature inspired me to pursue the questions that this dissertation explores. Professor Feldman‘s insights illuminated the subject of Israeli women writers for me; her guidance and advice have left an indelible imprint on my thinking, and on this dissertation.
  • The Knesset Building in Giv'at Ram: Planning and Construction

    The Knesset Building in Giv'at Ram: Planning and Construction

    The Knesset Building in Giv’at Ram: Planning and Construction Originally published in Cathedra Magazine, 96th Edition, July 2000 Written by Dr. Susan Hattis Rolef Introduction Already in the early days of modern Zionism, it was clear to those who envisioned the establishment of a Jewish State, and those who acted to realize the vision, that once it was established, it would be a democracy, in which a parliament would be built. In his book Altneuland (written in 1902), Theodor Herzl, described the parliament of the Jewish state in Jerusalem in the following words: “[A] great crowd was massed before (the Congress House). The election was to take place in the lofty council chamber built of solid marble and lighted from above through matte glass. The auditorium seats were still empty, because the delegates were still in the lobbies and committee rooms, engaged in exceedingly hot discussion…" 1 In his book Yerushalayim Habnuya (written in 1918), Boris Schatz, who had established the Bezalel school of arts and crafts, placed the parliament of the Jewish State on Mount Olives: "Mount Olives ceased to be a mountain of the dead… it is now the mountain of life…the round building close to [the Hall of Peace] is our parliament, in which the Sanhedrin sits".2 When in the 1920s the German born architect, Richard Kaufmann, presented to the British authorities his plan for the Talpiot neighborhood, that was designed to be a Jerusalem garden neighborhood, it included an unidentified building of large dimensions. When he was asked about the meaning of the building he relied in German: "this is our parliament building".
  • Name Tag Line Descriptiosector Tags Ilventure Homepage Promarketing Wizard Digital Ma Social Medifacebook A

    Name Tag Line Descriptiosector Tags Ilventure Homepage Promarketing Wizard Digital Ma Social Medifacebook A

    name tag_line yourdescriptio sector tags ilventure_homepage ProMarketing Wizard Digital Ma x000D_campaign. Social Medifacebook_ahttp://ilve http://www Allosterix Drug Disco_x000D_ Pharmaceutdrug_desighttp://ilvenhttp://www. WakeApp Social Alar disorders) Social Medimobile_applhttp://ilve http://www miCure Therapeutics MicroRNA-Bs. in real Pharmaceutmental_healhttp://ilve http://www AppMyDay Your in-eveenginetime. Social Mediphotos,brahttp://ilve http://www Question2Answer Free and Op_x000D_traffic. Social Mediopen_sourchttp://ilve http://www AgeMyWay Private Fam“Fair Digital Heamobile_healhttp://ilve http://www La'Zooz Collaborati_x000D_fare†. Social Medimobile_applhttp://ilvenhttp://lazoo Vidazoo Media Buyicrowdfund Social Mediuser_acquishttp://ilve http://www Applied CleanTech Convertingeing. to Environmenrecycling, http://ilve http://www Powercom Smart Grid Governmeutilities. Environmengas,energyhttp://ilve http://www GridON Fault Curre,nt such as Environmenpower_gridhttp://ilvenhttp://www TransAlgae Developmenconnectiviinjection. Agro and Fbreeding,bihttp://ilve http://www Acrylicom Physical Laconsuminty to POF. Industrial semiconduchttp://ilve http://www Green Invoice Electronic managemg. eCommerce,digital_sig http://ilve https://www SmartZyme Innovation Technologicent. Digital Heapatient_carhttp://ilve http://smz BondX Environment_x000D_BondX is a Environmencleantech,phttp://ilve http://www Treatec21 Industries Water and experienc Environmenwater_purifhttp://ilvenhttp://trea Scodix Digital Pri commercies. Industrial branding,dehttp://ilvenhttp://www
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    BIbLIOgRAPHY All items in Israeli Hebrew-language newspapers (Davar, Ha’aretz, Ma’ariv, Yediot Aharanot, etc.) were in Hebrew. GENERAL Interviews A. Select list of interviews by Michael Brecher Al-Baz, Mahmoud. May 1975. Allon, Yigal. 1960, 1965–66, 1968, 1973–74, 1977–78. Eytan, Walter. 1956. Avner, Gershon. July 1968. Bar-Lev, Haim. July 1974. Bar-On, Hanan. August 1968. Ben-Gurion, David. June 1966, May 1971. Bitan, Moshe. August 1968. Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. May 1975. Dayan, Moshe. May 1969. Eban, Abba. 1948, 1965–66, 1968 July 1968, 1973–74, 1977–78, 1995. Evron, Ephraim. March 1972. Eshkol, Levi. April 1966. Gazit, Mordekhai. July 1968, July 1974. Herzog, Ya’acov. April 1966, August 1968. Joseph, Dov. July 1960, June 1971. Keating, Kenneth. July 1974, August 1974. © The Author(s) 2017 365 M. Brecher, Dynamics of the Arab–Israel Conflict, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47575-2 366 BIBLIOGRAPHY Meir, Golda. August 1966, June 1968. Mohammed Sayeed Ahmad. May 1975, June 1975. Navon, Yitzhak. 1965–66. Peres, Shimon. 1960, 1965–66, 1968, 1973–74, 1977–78. Rafael, Gideon. August 1968. Rosen, Pinchas. February 1971. Sapir, Pinhas. August 1974. Shapira, Haim M. July 1968. Sharett, Moshe. July 1960. Sharif, Zehev. March 1966. Wilson, Harold. December 1972. Yariv, Aharon. August 1974. B. Other Interviews Barak, Ehud. “Continuation of Eyes Wide Shut.” Interview by Ari Shavit, Ha’aretz, 4 September 2002. Melchior, Michael. Interview, Ha’aretz, 12 March 2007, 7. Other Sources Azran, Eran. 2016. Israeli Economy Grew 2.3% in 2015, Its Slowest Pace since 2009. Ha’aretz, 1 January 2016.
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    Don Quixote de la Corte: Serial litigants, emotions, and access to justice OÑATI SOCIO-LEGAL SERIES VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2 (2021), 503–533: “TOO MUCH LITIGATION?”: FACTS, REASONS, CONSEQUENCES, AND SOLUTIONS DOI LINK: HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1117 RECEIVED 02 SEPTEMBER 2019, ACCEPTED 09 DECEMBER 2019 ∗ 0BEYAL KATVAN0F ∗ 1BBOAZ SHNOOR 1F Abstract Serial litigants are a well-known phenomenon. This article deals with this phenomenon on two different levels using Israel as a test-case. First, we analyze the impact they have on the judicial system as a whole, and the institutional responses the judicial system uses in order to deal with serial litigants as well as the impact (both positive and negative) such serial litigants have on other litigants. Second, we analyze the personal motives of serial litigants and identify their common denominators, as well as what differentiates them. In this regard the article offers a unique approach by presenting the perspective of serial litigants and the human dimension behind their claims. We then show that serial litigants do not constitute a monolithic group, and suggest that courts have to take the differences between them into account. We further propose the formulation of systemic tools that take into account both the negative and the positive aspects of serial litigants in order to strike a proper balance between the optimal allocation of resources, and the right of access to justice. Key words Courts; serial litigants; access to justice The authors declare that the research published in this paper was done according to the Statement Of Principles Of Ethical Research Practice of the SLSA, as published in https://www.slsa.ac.uk/images/slsadownloads/ethicalstatement/slsa%20ethics%20statement%20_final_%5 B1%5D.pdf ∗ Eyal Katvan is a senior lecturer at the Peres Academic Center.
  • Peace, Peace, When There Is No Peace (Israel and the Arabs 1948–1961)

    Peace, Peace, When There Is No Peace (Israel and the Arabs 1948–1961)

    Peace, Peace, When There Is No Peace (Israel and the Arabs 1948–1961) N. Israeli (Akiva Orr and Moshé Machover) Translated from Hebrew by Mark Marshall ii Introduction [to the first edition]................................................................................... xv Chapter 1: “Following Clayton’s Participation in the League’s Meetings”................ 1 Chapter 2: Borders and Refugees ................................................................................. 28 Map: How the Palestinian state was divided............................................................ 42 Chapter 3: Israel and the Powers (1948-1955)............................................................. 83 Chapter 4: Israel and Changes in the Arab World ................................................... 141 Chapter 5: Reprisal Actions......................................................................................... 166 Chapter 6: “The Third Kingdom of Israel” (29/11/56 – 7/3/57).............................. 225 Chapter 7: Sinai War: Post-Mortem........................................................................... 303 Chapter 8: After Suez................................................................................................... 394 Chapter 9: How is the Problem to be Solved?............................................................ 420 Appendices (1999) ......................................................................................................... 498 Appendix 1: Haaretz article on the 30th anniversary of “Operation Qadesh”

  • Narratives of Israeli-Palestinian History

    Ilan Pappé is Director of the European Centre for Palestine Studies and a fellow of the Institute for Arab and Islamic Studies at the University of Exeter. He is also Co-director of The Exeter Centre for Ethno-Political Studies. He is the author of various books, including The Making of the Arab–Israeli Conflict (I.B.Tauris). Jamil Hilal is a sociologist associated with Birzeit University and has lectured at several UK universities. He has held senior associate research fellowships at the University of Oxford and SOAS, and in 2008 he was a visiting scholar at Carnegie Middle East Center. P1: PHB Trim: 138mm × 216mm Top: 1in Gutter: 1in IBBK033-FM IBBK033-Serieslist-Demis ISBN: 978 1 84885 243 3 May 12, 2010 17:6 LIBRARY OF MODERN MIDDLE EAST STUDIES Series ISBN: 978 1 84885 243 3 See www.ibtauris.com/LMMES for a full list of titles 96. Occidentalisms in the Arab 102. The Politics and Poetics of World: Ideology and Images of the Ameen Rihani: The Humanist West in the Egyptian Media Ideology of an Arab-American Robbert Woltering Intellectual and Activist 978 1 84885 476 5 Nijmeh Hajjar 978 1 84885 266 2 97. The Army and the Radical Left in Turkey: Military Coups, Socialist 103. The Transformation of Turkey: Revolution and Kemalism Redefining State and Society from the Ozg¨ ur¨ Mutlu Ulus Ottoman Empire to the Modern Era 978 1 84885 484 0 Fatma Muge¨ Goc¨ ¸ek 978 1 84885 611 0 98. Power and Policy in Syria: Intelligence Services, Foreign Relations 104. Art and Architecture in the and Democracy in the Modern Middle Islamic Tradition: Aesthetics, Politics East and Desire in Early Islam Radwan Ziadeh Mohammed Hamdouni Alami 978 1 84885 434 5 978 1 84885 544 1 99.
  • The First Jewish- Arab Literary Encounter in Israel Somekh, Sasson

    The First Jewish- Arab Literary Encounter in Israel Somekh, Sasson

    "Reconciling Two Great Loves": The First Jewish- Arab Literary Encounter in Israel Somekh, Sasson . Israel Studies ; Bloomington Vol. 4, Iss. 1, (Mar 31, 1999): 1. ProQuest document link ABSTRACT (ABSTRACT) The three journalists together with Rashid Hussayn conceived of the idea of setting up a meeting between Arabic and Hebrew writers. After lengthy discussions (during which the novelist Aharon Megged, literary editor for Lamerhav, Ahdut HaAvodah's daily, and the poet Haim Gouri were introduced to the proposal), the time, place and list of participants were decided upon. At first Tammuz and his colleagues refused to allow writers affiliated with MAKI to be invited to the meeting; but they quickly realized that, without MAKI, the most influential Arab writers in Israel would be absent. Furthermore, all the Arab writers whom [Rashid] represented throughout the discussions were members of "The Union of Arab Writers and Intellectuals." Eventually, both communist and non-communist writers who were members of the Union received invitations. The list of participants did not include [Emil Habiby], a Knesset member representing MAKI, either because he was a political personality of too high a profile or because of his own reluctance to attend. It seems fair to say that Habiby's literary endeavors were rather low on his agenda at this point in his career, and he had not yet come to regard himself as a "novelist." Other Arab writers, such as [Michel Haddad], who was supposedly closely identified with the "Establishment" were also not invited. What
  • The Six Day War: the War That No One Wanted

    The Six Day War: the War That No One Wanted

    Israel Affairs ISSN: 1353-7121 (Print) 1743-9086 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fisa20 The Six Day War: the war that no one wanted Yossi Goldstein To cite this article: Yossi Goldstein (2018) The Six Day War: the war that no one wanted, Israel Affairs, 24:5, 767-784, DOI: 10.1080/13537121.2018.1505475 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2018.1505475 Published online: 24 Aug 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1197 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fisa20 ISRAEL AFFAIRS 2018, VOL. 24, NO. 5, 767–784 https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2018.1505475 The Six Day War: the war that no one wanted Yossi Goldstein Israeli Haritage, Ariel University, Ariel ABSTRACT As a military clash that it is still unclear if anyone truly wanted, the June 1967 Six Day War remains one of the most curious military conflicts in modern history. Israel certainly did not prefer the military route, and neither did Egypt, Syria, or the Soviet Union. Yet while it was clear to these parties from the outset that nothing good could come from such a clash, they backed Israel into a corner from which it was unable to extricate itself without going to war. This article explores the factors that caused the war at the time and in the manner it did. KEYWORDS Arab‒Israeli conflict; Six Day War; Israel; Egypt; Soviet Union; US‒Israel relations; Levy Eshkol; Gamal Abdel Nasser; civil‒military relations The immediate turn of events leading up to the outbreak of the Six Day War began on 11 May 1967, when an intelligence officer in the Soviet Embassy in Tel Aviv passed fabricated information to Syria and Egypt indicating the massing of Israeli forces along the Syrian border.
  • Afeka Journal of Engineering and Science

    Afeka Journal of Engineering and Science

    Afeka Journal of Engineering and Science Second Issue, October 2020 [email protected] Chief Editor: Dr. Kuti Shoham Scientific Editor: Dr. Yaron Cohen Tzemach Linguistic Editor: Ran Cohen Produced by the Marketing and Communication Unit Afeka Academic College of Engineering Cover design: Yael Shumer Design and formatting: Nilly Amir-Sagi Afeka Tel Aviv Academic College of Engineering Mivtza Kadesh St., Tel Aviv 38 Afeka.ac.il Table of Contents Editors’ Preface 5 President's Opening Remarks 7 1. Doron Avital Bismarck with an iPhone: The Future of the Age of Reason 9 2. Ronen Bar-El Corona, Science and Regulation: An Economist’s View 23 3. Omer Beck Heaven Help: Civilian Aviation During the Covid-19 Crisis 31 4. Sharon Geva Concrete and Flowers: The Public Image of Engineer Prof. Rachel Shalon 37 5. Sharon Gordon The Technological Revolutions of Money: How We Learned to Count and Love the State 45 6. Idan Militscher Technology, Sexuality and Online Sexual Therapy 55 7. Yossi Rosenwaks and Arnon Bentur Engineering Education in the 21st Century 65 8. Gabi Shafat Critical Thinking and Creativity in Engineering Education 73 9. Galit Wellner Philosophy of Digital Technology 79 10. Itzik Yosef The Story of the Clock: How It Was Discovered that the Earth's Rotation Slows 87 | 4 | Editors’ Preface Dear readers, The coronavirus crisis burst into our lives in Israel in the spring of 2020 and changed them in one fell swoop. The higher education system in Israel switched to online teaching within a few days and adapted the nature of studies to the demands of social distancing.

  • Israel, Nigeria and the Biafra Civil War 1967–70

    Journal of Genocide Research, 2014 Vol. 16, Nos. 2–3, 263–280, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2014.936704 Israel, Nigeria and the Biafra civil war, 1967–70 ZACH LEVEY The Biafran secession of 1967 and ensuing civil war presented Israel with an acute dilemma. Israel sought to maintain correct relations with the Federal Government of Nigeria, which viewed as a hostile act any support rendered to the Biafran separatists. At the same time, the plight of the Igbos reminded many Israelis of the Holocaust. This article makes use of Israeli archival material to shed new light on how Israel shaped its policy towards the conflict. The Israeli public, press and parliament called for assistance to Biafra, evoking their country’s deep moral obligation to help a people in distress. Israel aided Biafra, including, in a clandestine manner, the supply of weapons for which the secessionists pressed, in addition to humanitarian assistance. At the same time, Israel also sold arms to Nigeria, seeking to prevent a diplomatic rupture with the Lagos government that would have affected Israel’s position in all of black Africa. Introduction This article analyses Israeli policy towards the Nigerian civil war, exploring Israel’s relations with both the Federal Military Government of Nigeria (FMG) and separatist Biafra. Israel encountered obstacles in Nigeria that turned that country into one of the most difficult tests of its African statecraft. The most severe challenge Israel faced in Nigeria was the 1967 Biafran secession, the product of Nigeria’s acute political and ethnic conflicts. By that time, Israel had begun to sell Nigeria military equipment on a modest scale and hoped to heighten security ties in order to further consolidate relations with the Nigerian govern- ment.

  • The June 1967 War and Its Aftermath Gabi Siboni, Kobi Michael, and Anat Kurz, Editors

    Six Days, Fifty Years The June 1967 War and its Aftermath Gabi Siboni, Kobi Michael, and Anat Kurz, Editors Memorandum 184 Six Days, Fifty Years: The June 1967 War and its Aftermath Gabi Siboni, Kobi Michael, and Anat Kurz, Editors Institute for National Security Studies The Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), incorporating the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, was founded in 2006. The purpose of the Institute for National Security Studies is first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel’s national security as well as Middle East regional and international security affairs. Second, the Institute aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are – or should be – at the top of Israel’s national security agenda. INSS seeks to address Israeli decision makers and policymakers, the defense establishment, public opinion makers, the academic community in Israel and abroad, and the general public. INSS publishes research that it deems worthy of public attention, while it maintains a strict policy of non-partisanship. The opinions expressed in this publication are the authors’ alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its trustees, boards, research staff, or the organizations and individuals that support its research. Six Days, Fifty Years: The June 1967 War and its Aftermath Gabi Siboni, Kobi Michael, and Anat Kurz, Editors Memorandum No. 184 November 2018 שישה ימים וחמישים שנה עורכים: גבי סיבוני, קובי מיכאל וענת קורץ Institute for National Security Studies (a public benefit company) 40 Haim Levanon Street POB 39950 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv 6997556 Israel Tel.