Vernacular Architecture 2.Qxd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Georgian & Federal Architecture in New Jersey O Janet W. Foster O GardenStateLegacy.com Issue 7 O March 2010 Cavalier Jouet House, built 1757-1760, in Elizabeth, New Jersey. A rare example of a fully realized, masonry Georgian era Palladian-style house in Colonial New Jersey. Characteristic features include the strict symmetry of the composition, the main house flanked by matching wings, and classical details including corner quoins, keystones over the main windows, and Ionic columns at the front entrance. The house is no longer extant. Image from the Historic American Buildings Survey. ith the American Revolution, a new often a separate kitchen outbuilding to prevent political state was established, and a the main house from becoming too hot. The Wlong process of defining what exactly Mid-Atlantic states of New York, New Jersey, and was “American” was begun. There was an Pennsylvania had culture, as well as climate, as interest in defining a national identity, in arts, a driver of vernacular building traditions. Settled culture, and politics. But the new nation by a variety of European language and culture remained a place of sharply different local and groups, differences between communities within regional identities, and different architectural even one state were as numerous and marked as expressions. The “Cape Cod” house of New any of the similarities that bound these people England had a large central chimney, low together as “Americans.” ceilings, and a kitchen integral to the house—all New Jersey had a particularly diverse set of features developed to conserve heat in the long colonial-era settlers—from New England and months of a cold New England winter. In from Old England, from the German states, contrast, houses throughout the South had Scandinavia, and from the Low Countries, all of chimneys outside the body of the building, and whom created lasting communities with strong Georgian & Federal Architecture in New Jersey O Janet W. Foster O GardenStateLegacy.com Issue 7 O March 2010 NAME THAT HOUSE? A center-hall house from the early 19th century in Metuchen, Middlesex County, New Jersey. This is a good representation of the evolution of the Georgian country house ideal of the 18th century to the commonly-built house type of early America. The bay window is a later addition. Photo by the author. associations to their old culture and traditions. used a classical architectural vocabulary. No But the period between the American Revolution longer would the homes of the gentry impress and the first quarter of the 19th century marked a with their strength and impenetrability, as period of great change as the insular, regional medieval castles had done. No longer could a communities of New Jersey and other states house added to over the generations to worked to forge a common culture and to accommodate many rooms and functions be become “American.” This change may be praised simply for its size. An important 18th marked in many ways, not least of which was a century house needed to have a formal, change in the vernacular architecture of the classically -referenced design to impress and to country. express one’s status and wealth. This Georgian In the beginning of the 18th century, the ideal began in homes of the English-affiliated wealthiest and most aspiring of the colonial elite elite but soon was adopted in its most basic built houses to imitate the fashionable residences levels by many people, and it transformed of the upper classes in England. Such houses are regional vernacular architecture in New Jersey. today described as “Georgian,” named for the Georgian formality in architecture stood in English monarchs, George I, II and III, who ruled distinct contrast to the vernacular dwellings that England and its colonies, from 1714 through constituted the building traditions all over the 1830. A Georgian house was the English world. Vernacular houses used local materials, interpretation of Italian Renaissance design, as responded to local climate and environment, published in works of Andrea Palladio and and were typically extended and modified others. The style is perhaps best described as the through time not according to a set design, but triumph of form over function, or of formality according to the needs of the occupants. A over the informal. The Georgian house previous article examined some of the distinct presented itself as a strictly regular form, focused vernacular building traditions of colonial New on a formal façade and decorative details that Jersey. But vernacular architecture and Georgian & Federal Architecture in New Jersey O Janet W. Foster O GardenStateLegacy.com Issue 7 O March 2010 The classic floorplan of a five—bay center hall Georgian, with a hall as the dominant organizing element, and each room separately accessible from it. From the HABS documentation of Boxwood Hall in Elizabeth, NJ. traditional design is not impervious to change qualities on the exterior. Its symmetry told of a and adaptation, and it is clear that New Jersey revolution occurring inside as well. The center builders and their clients were interested in the front door of a full five-bay Georgian house formality and regularity of the Georgian style as opened into a hall running the depth of the early as the mid-18th century. building, and all the main rooms were accessed The formal, symmetrical mansion of the 18th from this hallway. Vernacular dwellings placed century gentry was adopted and adapted to entries into rooms where needed—directly from become a distinctly American house type by the the outside, or into one room from another early 19th century. One adaptation was in without mediation of a hallway. The idea of materials—high style Georgian mansions in creating a hall, and thus of controlling access to England and colonial America were masonry. In each individual room, was entirely new. Much America, wood was the cheapest, most available has been written about the changes in the ideas and workable building material, and most of the of the family, and of the development of the local vernacular versions of the Georgian style concept of privacy in the 18th century, and its used clapboard siding and wooden dentil adoption by a large swath of the American moldings and columns. This immediately gave public, whether rich or poor, urban or rural. [ For American architecture a distinctive look from its instance, see Richard Bush, The Refinement of European cousins, even when they followed the America]. Nothing illustrates this so vividly as the same form and detailing. development of the center hall as an organizing The Georgian house not only had formal device for domestic living Georgian & Federal Architecture in New Jersey O Janet W. Foster O GardenStateLegacy.com Issue 7 O March 2010 The classic floorplan of an East Jersey cottage, with a hall running front to back and accessing two principal rooms in the main part of the house. Asymmetrically arranged lateral service additions were typical of the East Jersey cottage. The three- bay, side-hall plan was used here in a free-standing farmhouse of one-and-a-half stories, but the plan was also used in two and three story town houses. From the HABS documentation of the Guerin House, outside Morristown, Morris County, and now part of the Morristown National Historical Park at Jockey Hollow. Until the 1750s, the number of center-hall Under the influence of the Georgian high style, Georgian-inspired houses in all the American the Dutch changed their preference for spatial colonies may not have exceeded two hundred, organization and façade design to the center- and those were all owned by the wealthiest hall, five bay house type. There was no abrupt people. By the 1820s, the center hall Georgian shift from one form to the other, and in the latter house was found across all the states and 18th century, both types were being built territories of the United States, and was used as simultaneously. But by the early 19th century, the a house form across a wide swath of cultural, “Dutch Colonial” was a fully developed and social and economic strata. distinctive vernacular architecture in New Jersey For instance, the colonial-era Dutch-American and New York, although the type is neither houses found in northern and central New Jersey strictly “Dutch” in its culture nor “colonial” in its communities settled by the Dutch, often used a chronology. It is American. Characterized by a four-bay façade, with paired entries, leading into gambrel roof, sweeping eaves, and a separate rooms within the house. brownstone base, the Dutch colonial came to be Georgian & Federal Architecture in New Jersey O Janet W. Foster O GardenStateLegacy.com Issue 7 O March 2010 House in Delaware, New Jersey. This house exhibits all the characteristics of Federal style design in northern New Jersey— gambrel roof, three-bay, side-hall plan, and decorative embellishments in the round-arched window and two quarter-round windows at the attic level of the side of the house. Photo by the author. built as an emblem of the Dutch-rooted families New York. who still controlled much of the real estate and The gambrel roof is characteristic of the Dutch civic institutions of Bergen County in particular, Colonial House, and also of many other and parts of Monmouth and Somerset Counties, dwellings from the Federal period in New Jersey. in the early 19th century. It was also the last The gambrel, with its two-part pitch, created signifier of a formerly distinct cultural group. At more useable attic space. It had been used in the same moment the “Dutch Colonial” house European buildings from the 17th century was being developed, the Dutch language was onward, and may be found in 18th century disappearing even from their Reformed American structures up and down the East Coast.
Recommended publications
  • Brief History of Architecture in N.C. Courthouses

    Brief History of Architecture in N.C. Courthouses

    MONUMENTS TO DEMOCRACY Architecture Styles in North Carolina Courthouses By Ava Barlow The judicial system, as one of three branches of government, is one of the main foundations of democracy. North Carolina’s earliest courthouses, none of which survived, were simple, small, frame or log structures. Ancillary buildings, such as a jail, clerk’s offi ce, and sheriff’s offi ce were built around them. As our nation developed, however, leaders gave careful consideration to the structures that would house important institutions – how they were to be designed and built, what symbols were to be used, and what building materials were to be used. Over time, fashion and design trends have changed, but ideals have remained. To refl ect those ideals, certain styles, symbols, and motifs have appeared and reappeared in the architecture of our government buildings, especially courthouses. This article attempts to explain the history behind the making of these landmarks in communities around the state. Georgian Federal Greek Revival Victorian Neo-Classical Pre – Independence 1780s – 1820 1820s – 1860s 1870s – 1905 Revival 1880s – 1930 Colonial Revival Art Deco Modernist Eco-Sustainable 1930 - 1950 1920 – 1950 1950s – 2000 2000 – present he development of architectural styles in North Carolina leaders and merchants would seek to have their towns chosen as a courthouses and our nation’s public buildings in general county seat to increase the prosperity, commerce, and recognition, and Trefl ects the development of our culture and history. The trends would sometimes donate money or land to build the courthouse. in architecture refl ect trends in art and the statements those trends make about us as a people.
  • Keeping the Cottage in the Family

    Keeping the Cottage in the Family

    Keeping the Cottage in the Family A country place is a symbol of relaxation, continuity in life, and family harmony. But when the topic of ownership succession is raised, that lovely spot can be transformed into a source of stress, uncertainty and family strife Anthony Layton MBA, CIM August 2017 Keeping the Cottage in the Family | 1 Letter from Anthony Layton Cottage succession, along with other estate planning issues, is among my professional specialties. After decades of helping families confront and solve the cottage-succession problem, I decided to put pen to paper and document this knowledge. The result is Keeping the Cottage in the Family, a detailed review of everything a cottage owner should consider when contemplating what happens when it’s time to pass on the property to the next generation. A succession plan can only be produced with the help of seasoned professionals who are familiar with the many pitfalls common to this challenge. I would like to thank Tom Burpee, Morris Jacobson and Matthew Elder for sharing their considerable expertise in the preparation of this article. Sincerely, Anthony Layton MBA, CIM CEO and Portfolio Manager, PWL Capital Inc. Table of Contents A responsibility as well as a privilege .................... 6 The taxman must be paid, one way or another.............................................................. 12 Get a head start .................................................... 7 Owning through a trust ........................................ 12 Planning closer to the event................................... 8 Share-ownership agreements .............................. 13 The capital gains tax problem ............................... 9 Use of a nature conservancy .............................. 14 Use the exemption, or pay the tax? ...................... 9 Conclusion .......................................................... 14 A couple with two residences ...............................
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Executive Order 13967

    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Executive Order 13967

    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Executive Order 13967—Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture December 18, 2020 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Purpose. Societies have long recognized the importance of beautiful public architecture. Ancient Greek and Roman public buildings were designed to be sturdy and useful, and also to beautify public spaces and inspire civic pride. Throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, public architecture continued to serve these purposes. The 1309 constitution of the City of Siena required that "[w]hoever rules the City must have the beauty of the City as his foremost preoccupation . because it must provide pride, honor, wealth, and growth to the Sienese citizens, as well as pleasure and happiness to visitors from abroad." Three centuries later, the great British Architect Sir Christopher Wren declared that "public buildings [are] the ornament of a country. [Architecture] establishes a Nation, draws people and commerce, makes the people love their native country . Architecture aims at eternity[.]" Notable Founding Fathers agreed with these assessments and attached great importance to Federal civic architecture. They wanted America's public buildings to inspire the American people and encourage civic virtue. President George Washington and Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson consciously modeled the most important buildings in Washington, D.C., on the classical architecture of ancient Athens and Rome. They sought to use classical architecture to visually connect our contemporary Republic with the antecedents of democracy in classical antiquity, reminding citizens not only of their rights but also their responsibilities in maintaining and perpetuating its institutions.
  • Minute Man National Historical Park Concord, Massachusetts

    Minute Man National Historical Park Concord, Massachusetts

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Historic Architecture Program Northeast Region BATTLE ROAD STRUCTURE SURVEY PHASE II (Phase I included as Appendix) Minute Man National Historical Park Concord, Massachusetts Historic Architecture Program Olmsted Center for Landscape Preservation October 2005 Minute Man National Historical Park Battle Road Structure Survey Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………..…………...1 Use Types with Associated Uses for Historic Structures and Associated Landscapes…………………………………………………..………….4 Impact Assessment per Structure and Landscape……………………...…...………...6 Specific Sites: John Nelson House, Barn and Landscape……………………………….……7 Farwell Jones House, James Carty Barn and Landscape…………………...17 McHugh Barn and Landscape…………………………………………………27 Major John Buttrick House and Landscape…………………………...…….32 Noah Brooks Tavern, Rogers Barn and Landscape……………...…………38 Stow- Hardy House, Hovagimian Garage and Landscape…………………46 Joshua Brooks Jr. House and Landscape……………………………………..50 George Hall House and Landscape…………………………………………...54 Gowing- Clarke House and Landscape………………………………………59 Samuel Brooks House and Landscape………………………………………..62 Appendix (Phase I Report)…………………..…………………………………………65 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………...92 i Introduction Purpose of Project The Minute Man National Historical Park Battle Road Structure Survey project was completed in two phases. Phase I, completed in October 2004, determined an impact assessment for the 14 structures and 10 sites included in the project.
  • Servants' Passage

    Servants' Passage

    SERVANTS’ PASSAGE: Cultural identity in the architecture of service in British and American country houses 1740-1890 2 Volumes Volume 1 of 2 Aimée L Keithan PhD University of York Archaeology March 2020 Abstract Country house domestic service is a ubiquitous phenomenon in eighteenth and nineteenth century Britain and America. Whilst shared architectural and social traditions between the two countries are widely accepted, distinctive cultural identity in servant architecture remains unexplored. This thesis proposes that previously unacknowledged cultural differences between British and American domestic service can be used to rewrite narratives and re-evaluate the significance of servant spaces. It uses the service architecture itself as primary source material, relying on buildings archaeology methodologies to read the physical structures in order to determine phasing. Archival sources are mined for evidence of individuals and household structure, which is then mapped onto the architecture, putting people into their spaces over time. Spatial analysis techniques are employed to reveal a more complex service story, in both British and American houses and within Anglo-American relations. Diverse spatial relationships, building types and circulation channels highlight formerly unrecognised service system variances stemming from unique cultural experiences in areas like race, gender and class. Acknowledging the more nuanced relationship between British and American domestic service restores the cultural identity of country house servants whose lives were not only shaped by, but who themselves helped shape the architecture they inhabited. Additionally, challenging accepted narratives by re-evaluating domestic service stories provides a solid foundation for a more inclusive country house heritage in both nations. This provides new factors on which to value modern use of servant spaces in historic house museums, expanding understanding of their relevance to modern society.
  • A Self-Guided Walking Tour of Montrose Park

    A Self-Guided Walking Tour of Montrose Park

    A SELF-GUIDED WALKING TOUR OF MONTROSE PARK Montrose Park Historic District Association Our mission is to promote, preserve, and beautify the Montrose Park Historic District, maintain its integrity, and enhance the quality of life for all residents. Montrose Park Historic District Association is a non-profit, tax exempt organization under the IRS Code 501(c)(3) MONTROSE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT ASSOCIATION This walking tour celebrates the rich architectural heritage concentrated in South Orange and particularly in the Montrose Park neighborhood, which has been listed on the National Register of Historic Places since 1997. This tour doesn’t cover every house but highlights some of the more interesting homes in a structured leisurely walk that you can complete in about an hour. MPHDA thanks Janet Foster, a historic preservation consultant, for her assistance in curating the stops on this walk and for the written commentary, both about the houses featured and the development of the area we call Montrose Park. Walking instructions are in RED; Individual house addresses are in bold. BEGIN THE TOUR IN GROVE PARK, NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF GROVE ROAD AND RALSTON AVENUE A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON THE ORIGINS OF MONTROSE PARK In the mid-19th century, the Oranges were both traditional farming communities and emerging “resort” areas. “Mountain Station” was established by the 1840s along the Morris & Essex Railroad to serve the Mountain House, a fashionable hotel and spa located on the hill behind the Mountain Station. It advertised that South Orange and the hill to its west made it the “Switzerland of America”. Clearly, most people visiting had not been to Switzerland, or had even seen the Rockies.
  • City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin

    City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin

    City of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin Architectural and Historical Intensive Survey Report of Residential Properties Phase 2 By Rowan Davidson, Associate AIA & Jennifer L. Lehrke, AIA, NCARB Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 Project Director Joseph R. DeRose, Survey & Registration Historian Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Sponsoring Agency Wisconsin Historical Society Division of Historic Preservation – Public History 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2019-2020 Acknowledgments This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to Office of the Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240. The activity that is the subject of this intensive survey report has been financed entirely with Federal Funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the Wisconsin Historical Society. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society.
  • BEDFORDSHIRE ARC' OLOGY VOLUME 24 BEDFORDSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGY Formerly Issued As Bedfordshire Archaeological Journal

    BEDFORDSHIRE ARC' OLOGY VOLUME 24 BEDFORDSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGY Formerly Issued As Bedfordshire Archaeological Journal

    %C. _ I 'Ir:L-0 7 411 aa radlialiglat fi f! ii if Pde. ".1 !! U Il h 1 Hfini '? - u -./NRa- 1=1, -CL) BEDFORDSHIRE ARC' OLOGY VOLUME 24 BEDFORDSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGY formerly issued as Bedfordshire Archaeological Journal is published by the BEDFORDSHRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL BEDFORDSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGY volume 24, 2001 Additional copies and previous volumes may be obtained from the Sales Officer, Michael Dawson, Wykes Farm, Aliens Hill, Bozeat, Northamptonshire, NN29 7LW. Regular sub- scribers can receive each new volume as it is published at an advantageous price. Please note that Bedfordshire Archaeology is not published every year; the rate of publication is dependent on the receipt of sufficient suitable contributions and fimding. The Council also publishes an occasional monograph series in conjunction with Bedfordshire County Council. Contributions should be sent to the Editor, Bedfordshire Archaeology, 6 Neale Way, Wootton, Bedfordshire, MK43 9EP (Tel. 01234 297539). Intending contributors are advised to refer to the current volume for guidance on the formatting of articles. Bedfordshire Archaeological Council: Officers 2001 Chairman Ron Fowler Secretary John Bailey Teasurer Peter Wood Editor Stephen Coleman Monograph Editor Michael Dawson Sales Officer Michael Dawson together with representatives from the archaeological societies and museums of the county: Ampthill and District Archaeological and Local History Society Bedford Archaeological and Local History Society Bedford Museum, Bedford Borough Council Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire and
  • Architecture Overview and Activities

    Architecture Overview and Activities

    Educational Material Architecture Overview and Activities What is architecture? As defined by Merriam-Webster architecture is: 1. the art or science of building, specifically: the art or practice of designing and building structures and especially habitable ones. 2. a: formation or construction resulting from or as if from a conscious act (the architecture of the garden) b: a unifying or coherent form or structure (the novel lacks architecture) 3. architectural product or work. 4. a method or style of building. 5. the manner in which the components of a computer or computer system are organized and integrated Architectural style refers to the visual appearance of a building and not its function. Style is often influenced by values and aspirations held by a society or a community. Certain designs may serve as metaphors or symbols of what a particular group of people value, of what they consider important. For example, when the Pilgrims first settled in Massachusetts in 1620 they built structures that served their immediate needs: shelter and places of worship. Creating these particular buildings reflected their collective desire for a new home (building a house creates a feeling of permanence and stability) and freedom to worship as they liked. As more people settled in America they brought their own cultural styles and ideas which have continued to influence architectural design. Who Builds Great Buildings? Most of the world’s great buildings have been designed by architects. But there are many other buildings, including many homes, which were built by builders with no architectural training. These builders have sometimes used published plans created by architects or have created their own.
  • 2018 Holiday Cottage Brochure

    2018 Holiday Cottage Brochure

    HOLIDAY COT TAGES History, adventure, enjoyment. All on your doorstep. English Heritage cares for over 400 historic monuments, buildings and places – from world-famous prehistoric sites to grand medieval castles, from Roman forts on the edge of an empire to a Cold War bunker. Through these, we bring the story of England to life for over 10 million visitors each year. The English Heritage Trust is a charity, no. 1140351, and a company, no. 07447221, registered in England. www.english-heritage.org.uk English Heritage, The Engine House, Fire fly Avenue, Swindon SN2 2EH Cover image: Dover Castle 23996/BD4408/JAN18/PAR5000 WEST OF ENGLAND A PENDENNIS CASTLE Callie’s Cottage 6 The Custodian’s House 8 B ST MAWES CASTLE Fort House 10 C WITLEY COURT & GARDENS Pool House 12 SOUTH OF ENGLAND D CARISBROOKE CASTLE The Bowling Green Apartment 16 E OSBORNE Pavilion Cottage 18 N No 1 Sovereign’s Gate 20 No 2 Sovereign’s Gate 22 F BATTLE ABBEY South Lodge 24 G DOVER CASTLE M L The Sergeant Major’s House 26 Peverell’s Tower 28 H WALMER CASTLE & GARDENS Garden Cottage 30 K The Greenhouse Apartment 32 EAST OF ENGLAND J I AUDLEY END C HOUSE & GARDENS I Cambridge Lodge 36 EAST MIDLANDS H F G J KIRBY HALL D Peacock Cottage 40 E K HARDWICK OLD HALL B A East Lodge 42 NORTH YORKSHIRE L RIEVAULX ABBEY SYMBOL GUIDE Refectory Cottage 46 M MOUNT GRACE PRIORY, COTTAGES PROPERTY FACILITIES NEARBY HOUSE AND GARDENS Prior’s Lodge 48 Dogs (max 2 well-behaved) Events Pub Travel Cot/Highchair Tearoom Coast NORTHUMBERLAND Barbeque Shop Shops Wood Burner Children’s Play Area Train Station N LINDISFARNE PRIORY Wi-Fi Wheelchair Access Coastguard’s Cottage 52 Join us on social media englishheritageholidaycottages @EnglishHeritage All cottages are equipped with TV/DVD, washer/tumble dryer, dishwasher and microwave.
  • Teori Arsitektur 03

    Teori Arsitektur 03

    •Victorian architecture 1837 and 1901 UK •Neolithic architecture 10,000 BC-3000 BC •Jacobethan 1838 •Sumerian architecture 5300 BC-2000 BC •Carpenter Gothic USA and Canada 1840s on •Soft Portuguese style 1940-1955 Portugal & colonies •Ancient Egyptian architecture 3000 BC-373 AD •Queenslander (architecture) 1840s–1960s •Ranch-style 1940s-1970s USA •Classical architecture 600 BC-323 AD Australian architectural styles •New towns 1946-1968 United Kingdom Ancient Greek architecture 776 BC-265 BC •Romanesque Revival architecture 1840–1900 USA •Mid-century modern 1950s California, etc. Roman architecture 753 BC–663 AD •Neo-Manueline 1840s-1910s Portugal & Brazil •Florida Modern 1950s or Tropical Modern •Architecture of Armenia (IVe s - XVIe s) •Neo-Grec 1848 and 1865 •Googie architecture 1950s USA •Merovingian architecture 400s-700s France and Germany •Adirondack Architecture 1850s New York, USA •Brutalist architecture 1950s–1970s •Anglo-Saxon architecture 450s-1066 England and Wales •Bristol Byzantine 1850-1880 •Structuralism 1950s-1970s •Byzantine architecture 527 (Sofia)-1520 •Second Empire 1865 and 1880 •Metabolist Movement 1959 Japan •Islamic Architecture 691-present •Queen Anne Style architecture 1870–1910s England & USA •Arcology 1970s-present •Carolingian architecture 780s-800s France and Germany Stick Style 1879-1905 New England •Repoblación architecture 880s-1000s Spain •Structural Expressionism 1980s-present Eastlake Style 1879-1905 New England •Ottonian architecture 950s-1050s Germany Shingle Style 1879-1905 New England •Postmodern architecture 1980s •Russian architecture 989-1700s •National Park Service Rustic 1872–present USA •Romanesque architecture 1050-1100 •Deconstructivism 1982–present •Chicago school (architecture) 1880s and 1890 USA •Norman architecture 1074-1250 •Memphis Group 1981-1988 •Neo-Byzantine architecture 1882–1920s American •Blobitecture 2003–present •Gothic architecture •Art Nouveau/Jugendstil c.
  • The Carlsons at Home in Estonia, 1926-1937

    The Carlsons at Home in Estonia, 1926-1937

    The Carlsons: At Home in Estonia U.S. Consul Harry E. Carlson (Eesti Filmiarhiiv) U.S. Consul Harry E. Carlson and his wife Laura Reynert Carlson were two early fans of Estonia. While the normal tour of duty for a U.S. Consul was just two years, the Carlsons spent almost eleven years in Tallinn from 1926 to 1937. They liked life in Estonia so much that they kept summer homes in Haapsalu and Valgejõe where they spent their weekends and summers just like many Estonian couples. Making Estonia into a real family home, Harry and Laura's son Harry Edwin Reynert Carlson was born in Tallinn on October 21, 1927 – thereby setting a precedent which many U.S. diplomats have since followed. Harry Jr.'s sister Margaret Elisabeth Reynert Carlson was born here several years later on January 30, 1932. The Carlson's made themselves at home in Estonia in many other ways. Harry was a well-known fisherman and went fishing every chance he got. On February 1, 1937, Rahvaleht described Harry as belonging to a "family of famous sports fishermen." Like many Americans, Harry also liked to drive – he would take his car and drive his family all across Estonia to fish or spend time in the country-side. According to Postimees (May 5, 1932), one of the Carlsons' favorite places was Rõuge in southern Estonia near the town of Võru. By the end of his extended tour in Estonia, Harry seemed to have developed a particular affinity for Estonian summers. During his farewell interview to Uus Eesti (January 21, 1937), Harry was quoted as saying: "Estonia is not so rich in nature and the climate here is not that pleasant either, but the short Estonian summer is very appealing." By the time the Carlsons left for their onward assignment in London on February 1, 1937, they seem to have adjusted quite well to life in Estonia.