DOCSLIB.ORG

The Lands of Maryland and Washington, D.C. That Imagination Stage Occupies Have Been Cared for by First Nations People Since As Early As 9,500 BCE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Lands of Maryland and Washington, D.C. That Imagination Stage Occupies Have Been Cared for by First Nations People Since As Early As 9,500 BCE The lands of Maryland and Washington, D.C. that Imagination Stage occupies have been cared for by First Nations People since as early as 9,500 BCE. First Nations People are believed to have crossed the Allegheny Mountains and settled in the Potomac River valley due to the abundance of fish in the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers as well as wildlife in the surrounding woodlands. The land of present-day Montgomery County and Washington, D.C. is most closely associated with the Nacotchtank Tribe who lived on the Maryland side of the Potomac River. Deriving their characteristic name from an Algonquian term meaning “town of traders,” the Nacotchtank tribe used their proximity to the rivers to trade with other First Peoples near and far. Using their abundance of natural resources, the Nacotchtank traded (mainly in furs) with tribes as far away as the Iroquois of New York. The Nacotchtank Tribe were part of a larger, loose confederation of tribes known as the Piscataway Chiefdom. The Nacotchtank people paid tribute to the Piscataway Chief or “Tayac,” and this association provided the Nacotchtank and surrounding tribes protection from the rival Powhatan Chiefdom in Eastern Virginia. In 1608 Captain John Smith set off from Jamestown to explore the regions along the Potomac River. While initial interactions were peaceful, tensions eventually increased, and due to increased land demand for cash crop farming, Europeans began to encroach on Nacotchtank tribal lands. This proximity introduced foreign diseases into tribal communities to which the Nacotchtank people had no immunity. Decreasing numbers forced the remaining tribal members to retreat to Anacostine Island (known today as Theodore Roosevelt Island). Eventually, tribal members sought the protection of the Piscataway Chiefdom. It is believed that the remaining members of the Nacotchtank people were absorbed into the larger Piscataway Tribe. Today, the Piscataway Tribe is active in the state of Maryland. Two major groups that have formed to represent the Piscataway Tribe: the Piscataway Indian Nation and Tayac Territory, and the Piscataway Conoy Tribe (further subdivided into Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Sub-Tribes and Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians). On January 9, 2012, both the Piscataway Conoy Tribe and the Piscataway Tribe were recognized by the State of Maryland via executive order. Imagination Stage acknowledges that the land on which our theatre home sits was, and is, still inhabited and cared for by the Piscataway Conoy and Piscataway tribes. We are grateful for their past and continued stewardship of this land. The Piscataway and Piscataway Conoy tribes, especially their children, have powerful voices that have often been silenced throughout history. The influences of the Piscataway Chiefdom are felt today. The Anacostia River takes its name from the latinized name of the Nacotchtank people (mispronounced as “anacostine” by Jesuits from the Providence of Maryland). River Road and Wisconsin Avenue were created from trails woven into the land by First Nations People. Please connect with and learn more about the tribes and their current goals via their websites Piscataway Conoy Tribe and Cedarville Band Of Piscataway Indians. Bibliography Hedgpeth, D. (2018, November 22). A Native American Tribe Once Called D.C. Home. It's Had No Living Members for Centuries. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2018/11/22/native-american-tribe-once-called-dc- home-its-had-no-living-members-centuries/ Herman, D. (2018, July 3). American Indians of Washington, D.C. and the Chesapeake. American Association of Geographers. http://news.aag.org/2018/07/american-indians-of- washington-d-c-and-the-chesapeake/ Maryland Executive Branch. (2012, January 9). Maryland Code of Regulations 01.01.2012.01 [Executive Order]. CaseText. https://casetext.com/regulation/maryland- administrative-code/title-01-executive-department/subtitle-01-executive-orders/chapter-0101- executive-orders/section-0101201201-recognition-of-the-maryland-indian-status-of-the- piscataway-conoy-tribe Maryland Executive Branch. (2012, January 9). Maryland Code of Regulations 01.01.2012.02 [Executive Order]. CaseText. https://casetext.com/regulation/maryland- administrative-code/title-01-executive-department/subtitle-01-executive-orders/chapter-0101- executive-orders/section-0101201202-recognition-of-the-maryland-indian-status-of-the- piscataway-indian-nation Maryland State Archives. (2020, December 16). Maryland At A Glance. Maryland Manual On-Line. https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/01glance/native/html/01native.html#accohannock Navarro, M. A. (2020, October 9). Early Indian Life on Analostan Island. Smithsonian National Postal Museum. https://postalmuseum.si.edu/indiansatthepostoffice/mural5.html Nobleman, M. T. (2020, September 9). The Indigenous People of Montgomery County, Maryland. Noblemania. https://www.noblemania.com/2020/09/the-indigenous-people-of- montgomery.html Walston, M. (2016, April 11). History: The First Settlers in Montgomery County. Bethesda Magazine. https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-magazine/march-april-2016/history-the- first-settlers-in-montgomery-county/ What is a Land Acknowledgement? A Land Acknowledgement is a formal statement that acknowledges and respects the stewardship of the First People who lived on this land many thousands of years before our organization. It brings to the forefront the continuing relationship between First Peoples and their traditional homelands. A relationship that continues despite the forced removal of First People from their ancestral homes. Why Acknowledge the Land? A Land Acknowledgement decenters colonial history and brings to life a more complete story of a place. By highlighting the tribal history, we acknowledge the deep and perpetual relationship between the land and the First People who have cared for it since time immemorial. A Land Acknowledgement is only a first step, and it marks an ongoing effort by Imagination Stage to make our events and our building a welcoming place to all. The Land Acknowledgement invites all to be mindful that colonialism is an ongoing process, one that requires concentrated action to work against. What Can I Do? If the Land Acknowledgement has inspired you, please visit the websites included above to learn more about the ongoing goals and initiatives of the tribes. Our Land Acknowledgement isn’t a complete source of information, and it is intended to spark respectful action in the Imagination Stage Community. Sources (to be better integrated later) https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2018/11/22/native-american-tribe-once-called-dc-home-its- had-no-living-members-centuries/ http://news.aag.org/2018/07/american-indians-of-washington-d-c-and-the-chesapeake/ https://postalmuseum.si.edu/indiansatthepostoffice/mural5.html https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-magazine/march-april-2016/history-the-first-settlers-in- montgomery-county/ https://www.noblemania.com/2020/09/the-indigenous-people-of-montgomery.html https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/01glance/native/html/01native.html#accohannock https://casetext.com/regulation/maryland-administrative-code/title-01-executive-department/subtitle- 01-executive-orders/chapter-0101-executive-orders/section-0101201201-recognition-of-the- maryland-indian-status-of-the-piscataway-conoy-tribe https://casetext.com/regulation/maryland-administrative-code/title-01-executive-department/subtitle- 01-executive-orders/chapter-0101-executive-orders/section-0101201202-recognition-of-the- maryland-indian-status-of-the-piscataway-indian-nation .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds
    Defining the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for The Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds Prepared By: Scott M. Strickland Virginia R. Busby Julia A. King With Contributions From: Francis Gray • Diana Harley • Mervin Savoy • Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Mark Tayac • Piscataway Indian Nation Joan Watson • Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Subtribes Rico Newman • Barry Wilson • Choptico Band of Piscataway Indians Hope Butler • Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians Prepared For: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, Maryland St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland November 2015 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this project was to identify and represent the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman creek watersheds on the north shore of the Potomac River in Charles and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. The project was undertaken as an initiative of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay office, which supports and manages the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. One of the goals of the Captain John Smith Trail is to interpret Native life in the Middle Atlantic in the early years of colonization by Europeans. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept, developed as an important tool for identifying Native landscapes, has been incorporated into the Smith Trail’s Comprehensive Management Plan in an effort to identify Native communities along the trail as they existed in the early17th century and as they exist today. Identifying ICLs along the Smith Trail serves land and cultural conservation, education, historic preservation, and economic development goals. Identifying ICLs empowers descendant indigenous communities to participate fully in achieving these goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Bladensburg Prehistoric Background
    Environmental Background and Native American Context for Bladensburg and the Anacostia River Carol A. Ebright (April 2011) Environmental Setting Bladensburg lies along the east bank of the Anacostia River at the confluence of the Northeast Branch and Northwest Branch of this stream. Formerly known as the East Branch of the Potomac River, the Anacostia River is the northernmost tidal tributary of the Potomac River. The Anacostia River has incised a pronounced valley into the Glen Burnie Rolling Uplands, within the embayed section of the Western Shore Coastal Plain physiographic province (Reger and Cleaves 2008). Quaternary and Tertiary stream terraces, and adjoining uplands provided well drained living surfaces for humans during prehistoric and historic times. The uplands rise as much as 300 feet above the water. The Anacostia River drainage system flows southwestward, roughly parallel to the Fall Line, entering the Potomac River on the east side of Washington, within the District of Columbia boundaries (Figure 1). Thin Coastal Plain strata meet the Piedmont bedrock at the Fall Line, approximately at Rock Creek in the District of Columbia, but thicken to more than 1,000 feet on the east side of the Anacostia River (Froelich and Hack 1975). Terraces of Quaternary age are well-developed in the Bladensburg vicinity (Glaser 2003), occurring under Kenilworth Avenue and Baltimore Avenue. The main stem of the Anacostia River lies in the Coastal Plain, but its Northwest Branch headwaters penetrate the inter-fingered boundary of the Piedmont province, and provided ready access to the lithic resources of the heavily metamorphosed interior foothills to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Indians; Powhatan, Pocahontas, and European Contact
    Virginia Indians; Powhatan, Pocahontas, and European Contact HistoryConnects is made possible by the Hugh V. White Jr. Outreach Education Fund Table of Contents Virginia Indians; Powhatan, Pocahontas, and European Contact Teacher Guide Introduction/Program Description ............................................................. 3 Lesson Plan ................................................................................................. 4-7 Historical Background................................................................................ 8-9 Activities: Pre Lesson Activity: The Historical Record............................................ 10-12 During Lesson Activity: Vocab Sheet........................................................... 13 Post Lesson Activity: Pocahontas................................................................. 14 Suggested Review Questions......................................................................... 15 Student Worksheets Word Search.................................................................................................. 16 Algonquian Language Worksheet........................................................... 17-18 Selected Images/Sources Map of Virginia............................................................................................. 20 Images of Pocahontas............................................................................... 21-23 2 Introduction Thank you for showing interest in a HistoryConnects program from the Virginia Historical Society. We are really excited
    [Show full text]
  • How Cultural Factors Hastened the Population Decline of the Powhatan Indians
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2008 How Cultural Factors Hastened the Population Decline of the Powhatan Indians Julia Ruth Beckley Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/1553 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Julia Ruth Beckley, 2008 All Rights Reserved HOW CULTURAL FACTORS HASTENED THE POPULATION DECLINE OF THE POWHATAN INDIANS (1607-1699) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History at Virginia Commonwealth University. by JULIA RUTH BECKLEY Master of Arts in History, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2008 Bachelor of Arts in History, Christopher Newport University, 2003 Director: DR. SARAH MEACHAM PROFESSOR OF HISTORY, DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Director: DR. JOHN KNEEBONE PROFESSOR OF HISTORY, DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Director: DR. JOSHUA ECKHARDT PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH, DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia May 2008 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 2 ENGLISH CULTURAL FACTORS THAT
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Vol
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL. 96, NO. 4, PL. 1 tiutniiimniimwiuiiii Trade Beads Found at Leedstown, Natural Size SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 96. NUMBER 4 INDIAN SITES BELOW THE FALLS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK, VIRGINIA (With 21 Plates) BY DAVID I. BUSHNELL, JR. (Publication 3441) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SEPTEMBER 15, 1937 ^t)t Boxb (jBaliimore (prttfe DAI.TIMORE. MD., C. S. A. CONTENTS Page Introduction I Discovery of the Rappahannock 2 Acts relating to the Indians passed by the General Assembly during the second half of the seventeenth century 4 Movement of tribes indicated by names on the Augustine Herrman map, 1673 10 Sites of ancient settlements 15 Pissaseck 16 Pottery 21 Soapstone 25 Cache of trade beads 27 Discovery of the beads 30 Kerahocak 35 Nandtanghtacund 36 Portobago Village, 1686 39 Material from site of Nandtanghtacund 42 Pottery 43 Soapstone 50 Above Port Tobago Bay 51 Left bank of the Rappahannock above Port Tobago Bay 52 At mouth of Millbank Creek 55 Checopissowa 56 Taliaferro Mount 57 " Doogs Indian " 58 Opposite the mouth of Hough Creek 60 Cuttatawomen 60 Sockbeck 62 Conclusions suggested by certain specimens 63 . ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES Page 1. Trade beads found at Leedstown (Frontispiece) 2. North over the Rappahannock showing Leedstown and the site of Pissaseck 18 3. Specimens from site of Pissaseck 18 4. Specimens from site of Pissaseck 18 5. Specimens from site of Pissaseck 18 6. Specimens from site of Pissaseck 26 7. Specimens from site of Pissaseck 26 8. Specimens from site of Pissaseck 26 9. I. Specimens from site of Pissaseck.
    [Show full text]
  • American Indians of the Chesapeake Bay: an Introduction
    AMERICAN INDIANS OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY: AN INTRODUCTION hen Captain John Smith sailed up the Chesapeake Bay in 1608, American Indians had W already lived in the area for thousands of years. The people lived off the land by harvesting the natural resources the Bay had to offer. In the spring, thousands of shad, herring and rockfish were netted as they entered the Chesapeake’s rivers and streams to spawn. Summer months were spent tending gardens that produced corn, beans and squash. In the fall, nuts such as acorns, chestnuts and walnuts were gathered from the forest floor. Oysters and clams provided another source of food and were easily gathered from the water at low tide. Hunting parties were sent overland in search of deer, bear, wild turkey and other land animals. Nearby marshes provided wild rice and tuckahoe (arrow arum), which produced a potato-like root. With so much food available, the American Indians of the Chesapeake region were able to thrive. Indian towns were found close to the water’s edge near freshwater springs or streams. Homes were made out of bent saplings (young, Captain John Smith and his exploring party encounter two Indian men green trees) that were tied into a spearing fish in the shallows on the lower Eastern Shore. The Indians framework and covered with woven later led Smith to the village of Accomack, where he met with the chief. mats, tree bark, or animal skins. Villages often had many homes clustered together, and some were built within a palisade, a tall wall built with sturdy sticks and covered with bark, for defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Nanticoke Indigenous Cultural Landscape
    Indigenous Cultural Landscapes Study for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail: Nanticoke River Watershed December 2013 Kristin M. Sullivan, M.A.A. - Co-Principal Investigator Erve Chambers, Ph.D. - Principal Investigator Ennis Barbery, M.A.A. - Research Assistant Prepared under cooperative agreement with The University of Maryland College Park, MD and The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, MD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Nanticoke River watershed indigenous cultural landscape study area is home to well over 100 sites, landscapes, and waterways meaningful to the history and present-day lives of the Nanticoke people. This report provides background and evidence for the inclusion of many of these locations within a high-probability indigenous cultural landscape boundary—a focus area provided to the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay and the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Advisory Council for the purposes of future conservation and interpretation as an indigenous cultural landscape, and to satisfy the Identification and Mapping portion of the Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Cooperative Agreement between the National Park Service and the University of Maryland, College Park. Herein we define indigenous cultural landscapes as areas that reflect “the contexts of the American Indian peoples in the Nanticoke River area and their interaction with the landscape.” The identification of indigenous cultural landscapes “ includes both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife therein associated with historic lifestyle and settlement patterns and exhibiting the cultural or esthetic values of American Indian peoples,” which fall under the purview of the National Park Service and its partner organizations for the purposes of conservation and development of recreation and interpretation (National Park Service 2010:4.22).
    [Show full text]
  • For Sale | 1,410± Acres Powhatan County, Va
    FOR SALE | 1,410± ACRES HOBSON TRACT POWHATAN COUNTY, VA POWHATAN, VA 23139 Price: $2,200,000 Winchester 15 301 Leesburg 495 LATITUDE & LONGITUDE Washington Arlington Front Royal 66 Chantilly Falls Church “37.494734, -78.026835” Fairfax Alexandria Springeld 13 Manassas 113 Warrenton Dale City Waldorf 33 81 Shenandoah 301 Culpeper 17 Harrisonburg Staord 50 29 Fredericksburg King George Staunton 15 Spotsylvania Waynesboro Charlottesville 1 Chinoteague 220 95 Features 64 360 Lexington 64 Accomac Short Pump 295 Mechanicsville 13 288 Richmond 17 3± MILES of frontage on Appomattox River. 60 New Kent 81 Lynchburg Farmville Hopewell from Richmond. 460 Williamsburg <45 MINUTES Roanoke 360 Colonial Heights Blacksburg Petersburg 64 460 Newprt News EXCELLENT DEER AND TURKEY HUNTING. 15 Hampton Wytheville Chatham 258 85 Virginia 220 95 Beach BEAVER SWAMPS along river have provided great 360 Norfolk 29 460 Portsmouth Emporia Suolk Chesapeake duck hunting. Martinsville South Boston South Hill 58 Danville 58 ACCESS FROM BRACKETTS BEND ROAD via deeded 50’ easement or from Hwy 13 via Prescriptive easement. EXCELLENT INTERNAL ACCESS throughout property. 6± MILES OF INTERNAL ROADS. SIGNIFICANT MERCHANTABLE timber value in mature hardwoods. CONTACT BROKER FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. Contacts Randy Cosby 804-433-1819 MAIN OFFICE ADDRESS: 4198 Cox Road, Suite 200 | Glen Allen, VA 23060 [email protected] MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 71150 | Richmond, VA 23255 T 804-326-LAND (5263) | F 804-346-5901 COMMONWEALTHLAND.COM Joe Buhrman 804-433-1811 Commonwealth Land represents the Owner of this property. Information contained herein, is deemed reliable but not guaranteed. [email protected] Hobson Tract Powhatan County, Virginia, AC +/- Randy Cosby 804-433-1819 [email protected] Joe Buhrman 804-433-1811 [email protected] Old Pipeline River / Creek Primary Road Road / Trail Pond / Tank Boundary Buckingham The information contained herein was obtained from sources Bailey Foster deemed to be reliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor's Commission on Indian Affairs Annual Report
    Governor’s Commission on Indian Affairs Annual Report 2011 Mission Statement The Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs works to serve as a statewide clearinghouse for information; to identify unmet social and economic needs in the native community; to support government education programs for American Indian youth; to provide support in the process of obtaining Recognition of State and Federal Indian Status; and to promote the awareness and understanding of historical and contemporary American Indian contributions in Maryland. 2 Table of Contents Message from the Governor …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Message from the Executive Director, Governor’s Office of Community Initiatives…………….5 Message from the Chair, Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs………………………………………6 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 Commissioners……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 Commission Meeting Schedule…………………………………………………………………………………………..9 State and Federal Agency Partner Meetings and Events …………………………………………………….10 State Recognition…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....11 2011 initiatives…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..12 Outreach………………………………………………………………………………………………................................14 Commissioners in Action…………………………………………………………………………………………………….15 Resident Population………………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 Maryland Indigenous Tribes………………………………………………………………………………………………19 3 STATE OF MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR MARTIN O’MALLEY GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE 100 STATE Circle ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Greater York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape
    Defining the Greater York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape Prepared by: Scott M. Strickland Julia A. King Martha McCartney with contributions from: The Pamunkey Indian Tribe The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe The Mattaponi Indian Tribe Prepared for: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay & Colonial National Historical Park The Chesapeake Conservancy Annapolis, Maryland The Pamunkey Indian Tribe Pamunkey Reservation, King William, Virginia The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe Adamstown, King William, Virginia The Mattaponi Indian Tribe Mattaponi Reservation, King William, Virginia St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland October 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of its management of the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, the National Park Service (NPS) commissioned this project in an effort to identify and represent the York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape. The work was undertaken by St. Mary’s College of Maryland in close coordination with NPS. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept represents “the context of the American Indian peoples in the Chesapeake Bay and their interaction with the landscape.” Identifying ICLs is important for raising public awareness about the many tribal communities that have lived in the Chesapeake Bay region for thousands of years and continue to live in their ancestral homeland. ICLs are important for land conservation, public access to, and preservation of the Chesapeake Bay. The three tribes, including the state- and Federally-recognized Pamunkey and Upper Mattaponi tribes and the state-recognized Mattaponi tribe, who are today centered in their ancestral homeland in the Pamunkey and Mattaponi river watersheds, were engaged as part of this project. The Pamunkey and Upper Mattaponi tribes participated in meetings and driving tours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potomac Above the Falls — Archeological Identification And
    COHONGOROOTO: THE POTOMAC ABOVE THE FALLS ARCHEOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION STUDY OF C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ROCK CREEK TO SANDY HOOK (MILE MARKERS 0 TO 59) Volume I PREPARED FOR: NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 1100 OHIO DRIVE, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20242 PREPARED BY: THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. 2300 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20037 December 2005 Final Report COHONGOROOTO: THE POTOMAC ABOVE THE FALLS ARCHEOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION STUDY OF CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ROCK CREEK TO SANDY HOOK (MILE MARKERS 0 TO 59) VOLUME I Final Report PREPARED FOR: National Capital Region National Park Service 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20242 PREPARED BY: Stuart Fiedel, John Bedell, Charles LeeDecker THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. 2300 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20037 December 2005 FOREWORD This is the first of three volumes reporting the results of a three-year archeological survey of the easternmost 59 miles of the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historical Park (C&O Canal Park) for the National Park Service (NPS), National Capital Region, from 2003 through 2005. In recognition of the paucity of basic archeological data for the C&O Canal Park, and for other NPS properties in the National Capital Region, funds were devoted to implement the Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program (SAIP) in this area. The SAIP was developed to address the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (specifically Sections 106 and 110), Executive Order 11593, and the Archeological Resources Protection Act. The rationale for the archeological survey was based primarily on the NPS’s resource management needs under Section 110 rather than being driven by development or capital improvement projects within the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation and Partners: a History of Piscataway Park
    Preservation and Partners: A History of Piscataway Park Janet A. McDonnell, PhD December 2020 Resource Stewardship and Science, National Capital Area, National Park Service and Organization of American Historians EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the early republic period of American history, President George Washington was the most renowned resident of the Potomac River valley. His sprawling Mount Vernon estate sat on a hill directly across the Potomac River from the 17th century Marshall Hall estate in Maryland. There is ample evidence that Washington and his guests enjoyed and very much appreciated the stunning view. Many years later preserving this view would become the major impetus for establishing what we know today as Piscataway Park (PISC), a few miles south of Washington, DC. These lands along the Maryland shore of Potomac River were actively cultivated during George Washington’s time, and the existing park setting, which includes agricultural lands and open spaces interspersed with forests and wetlands, closely approximates that historic scene. The National Park Service’s (NPS) primary goal and responsibility in managing the park has been, and continues to be, preserving this historic scene of open fields and wooded areas and ensuring that it does not authorize any landscape alterations except those that would restore previously undisturbed sites, reduce visual intrusions, or maintain open fields. The NPS continues to take into account the slope and orientation of the terrain and the tree cover when considering the location of any new facilities. Piscataway Park and its associated lands are for the most part held under scenic easements and constitute a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) historic district made up of nearly 5,000 acres of meadow, woodland, and wetland, along six miles of the Potomac River shoreline from the head of Piscataway Creek to the historic Marshall Hall in Maryland’s Prince George’s and Charles counties.
    [Show full text]