DOCSLIB.ORG

Defining the Greater York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Defining the Greater York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape Defining the Greater York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape Prepared by: Scott M. Strickland Julia A. King Martha McCartney with contributions from: The Pamunkey Indian Tribe The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe The Mattaponi Indian Tribe Prepared for: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay & Colonial National Historical Park The Chesapeake Conservancy Annapolis, Maryland The Pamunkey Indian Tribe Pamunkey Reservation, King William, Virginia The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe Adamstown, King William, Virginia The Mattaponi Indian Tribe Mattaponi Reservation, King William, Virginia St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland October 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of its management of the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, the National Park Service (NPS) commissioned this project in an effort to identify and represent the York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape. The work was undertaken by St. Mary’s College of Maryland in close coordination with NPS. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept represents “the context of the American Indian peoples in the Chesapeake Bay and their interaction with the landscape.” Identifying ICLs is important for raising public awareness about the many tribal communities that have lived in the Chesapeake Bay region for thousands of years and continue to live in their ancestral homeland. ICLs are important for land conservation, public access to, and preservation of the Chesapeake Bay. The three tribes, including the state- and Federally-recognized Pamunkey and Upper Mattaponi tribes and the state-recognized Mattaponi tribe, who are today centered in their ancestral homeland in the Pamunkey and Mattaponi river watersheds, were engaged as part of this project. The Pamunkey and Upper Mattaponi tribes participated in meetings and driving tours. The Mattaponi tribe, the members of which were at the time involved in a project focused on identifying their historic resources, were only available for one meeting. Project methodology included the completion of historical background research; driving tours, face-to-face meetings, and interviews; and the collection of large data sets including environmental, archaeological, and land use data. Geographical Information Systems (GIS) technology was used to identify relationships between all these data forms to model the historical and contemporary Native landscape. These data sets are curated by the National Park Service, the Chesapeake Conservancy, and St. Mary’s College of Maryland. The three tribal communities are today located in three distinct but neighboring and sometimes overlapping spaces in the Pamunkey and Mattaponi river watersheds. For each tribe, the contemporary everyday landscape is relatively localized to those spaces. The Pamunkey, however, also include diasporic important communities located in Richmond, Virginia and in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. For the Upper Mattaponi and the Mattaponi, many tribal members work and are therefore tied to Richmond, Virginia. The analysis of the various data sets reveals both continuity and change in terms of Native use, stewardship, and meaning of the landscape. Settlements or towns occupied between 1200 and 1610 CE were often sited along waterways in areas where good, well-drained soils located in close proximity to marshlands and natural landings. The farming, hunting, and collecting practices supported by this environment persisted through the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries even as the three tribes became active participants in the market economy. While all three tribes recognize the significance of Werowocomoco, Powhatan’s principal town at the time of English invasion, and all three tribes are actively involved in the National Park Service’s efforts to preserve and interpret the site, Werowocomoco is not part of the three tribes’ everyday landscape. The reasons for this could be Werowocomoco’s early abandonment (by 1610 CE). Werowocomoco is also in the lower York valley while the three tribes are located along the narrower Pamunkey and Mattaponi rivers (above the York). Following a discussion of the York River ICL as represented by tribal members and through spatial analysis, ten recommendations are presented. These include: Connect modern-day Native communities to the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century landscapes. iii Continue the collection of oral history interviews with tribal members to document changing landscapes. Nomination of properties to the National Register of Historic Places. Build spatial datasets for future planning/documentation of tribal histories. Develop educational materials for non-tribal members. Gap analysis of key parcels. Documentation of urban ICLs. Expand the focus to other watersheds. Contact archaeological survey elsewhere in the Pamunkey and Mattaponi river valleys. Acknowledge the government-to-government relationship for Federally-recognized tribes. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A number of individuals and organizations contributed to the success of this project. The first acknowledgment must go to the three tribes, including the Pamunkey, Upper Mattaponi, and Mattaponi, who have made this part of Virginia their home for thousands of years. For the Pamunkey, we are grateful to Lauren Fox, Chief Robert Gray, Allyson Gray, and Ashley Atkins Spivey for their interest, enthusiasm, and assistance with organizing meetings and driving tours. Our thanks also go to former Chief Warren Cook, Layne Cook, John Henry Langston, and Grover Miles for spending time with us, sharing their stories and insights, and reviewing our findings. For the Upper Mattaponi, we are grateful to Chief Frank Adams for welcoming us to the tribe and for his interest, enthusiasm, and assistance with meeting and driving tour organization. We are also grateful to former Chief Ken Adams, Tommy Tuppence, Jimmy Adams, Jean Adams, Melvin Adams, Jr., Joan Faulkner, Jay Gillespie, William Hicks, Amanda McKinney, and Brenda McKinney. We will always remember our exciting “off-road” experience in a college van! For the Mattaponi, we are grateful to Chief Mark Custalow for taking the time to meet with us and share his stories about the Mattaponi shad hatchery. The driving tours organized as part of this project happened because of the generosity of the many landowners who welcomed us to their properties. Mr. James Woolford, who owns Cownes, Mr. William Tyler, who owns Island Farm, and Mrs. Nancy Ball Sharp, who owns the Sam Ball Farm, understood our goals and project purpose and allowed us access their farms. We appreciate their kindnesses in hosting our group. This project would not have happened without the foresight of the National Park Service (NPS), which has long recognized the importance of telling the history of America from a Native point of view. We are grateful to both NPS’s Chesapeake Bay Office and Colonial National Historical Park. We thank Colonial National Historical Park Superintendent Kym Hall for her strong support of this effort. We are especially grateful to Cindy Chance and Carolyn Black for their assistance, participation, and guidance with the project. The Chesapeake Conservancy provided the administrative oversight for the project. We thank Joel Dunn, Jacob Leizear, Joseph McCauley, and Susan Shingledecker, and former employee Colleen Whitlock, all of whom assisted with the management of the project. We especially appreciate Joe’s participation in several meetings with the tribes. Non-tribal stakeholders were extremely helpful with understanding the greater landscape of which the tribes are a part and how that landscape has been used, is used, and may be used in the future. Organizations represented in this project include the Fairfield Foundation, King William County Planning and Zoning, the King William Historical Society, the Naval Weapons Station-Yorktown, the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, the Virginia Department of Forestry, the York County Historical Museum, and York County Planning and Zoning. We are also grateful to Joe B. Jones and Dr. Christopher Shephard of the William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research for sharing information with us about their work in the York River valley and their plans for survey on the Pamunkey Reservation. v At. St. Mary’s College of Maryland, Sabine Dillingham, Adam Malisch, Irene Olnick, Morgan Smith, and Lori Marks shepherded the project from start to finish, ensuring our administrative responsibilities were met. We have endeavored to produce a report that will be useful to the National Park Service. We are also hopeful that the report is just as useful to the members of the Pamunkey, Upper Mattaponi, and Mattaponi tribes. We again thank the National Park Service and the tribes for their trust in our work. Scott M. Strickland Julia A. King St. Mary’s City, Maryland Martha McCartney Williamsburg, Virginia vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. …iii Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ vii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. ix List of Tables ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA
    Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA Prepared for: Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Submitted by: Virginia Institute of Marine Science Submitted: February 24, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... vi 1.INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Regulations Background ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Watershed Characteristics ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Recreation Use Impairments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Church Trends in Latin America
    A PROLADES Study, Reflection & Discussion Document DRAFT COPY - NOT FOR PUBLICATION Church Trends in Latin America Compiled and Edited by Clifton L. Holland, Director of PROLADES Last revised on 21 December 2012 Produced by PROLADES Apartado 1525-2050, San Pedro, Costa Rica Telephone: 506-2283-8300; FAX 506-234-7682 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.prolades.com 2 CONTENTS Introduction: Defining the “full breadth of Christianity in Latin America” I. A General Overview of Religious Affiliation in Latin America and the Caribbean by Regions and Countries, 2010………………………………………………………………….. 5 II. The Western Catholic Liturgical Tradition……………………………………………………. 10 A. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………... 10 B. The period of Roman Catholic hegemony in Latin America, 1500-1900…………………………. 18 (1) The Holy Office of the Inquisition in the Americas…………………………………………… 18 (2) Religious Liberty in Latin America after Independence………………………………………. 26 (3) Concordats……………………………………………………………………………………. 32 C. The period of accelerated religious change in Latin America, 1800 to date……………………… 36 D. Defections from the Roman Catholic Church in Latin America since 1950; the changing religious marketplace………………………………………………………………... 41 (1) Defections to Protestantism…………………………………………………………………… 42 (2) Defections to Marginal Christian groups……………………………………………………... 60 (3) Defections to independent Western Catholic movements…………………………………….. 60 (4) Defections to non-Christian religions………………………………………………………… 61 (5) Defections to secular society (those with no
    [Show full text]
  • James River Geography
    James River Geography Welcome to NOAA's James River Interpretive Buoy, located at latitude 37 degrees 12.25 minutes North, longitude 76 degrees 46.65 minutes West. It lies off Jamestown Island about a quarter-mile south of Captain John Smith's statue, where he can see it well as he looks out over the river. This buoy is anchored in 43 feet of water at the edge of the narrow shoal that runs along the island. The river's channel is deep here, as the James narrows down between Swanns Point on the south and Jamestown on the north, but it quickly shoals as it sweeps through the broad meander curve from Cobham Bay around Hog Island and down toward Burwell Bay. The buoy lies about thirty miles above the mouth of the James at Hampton Roads. Jamestown Island lies at a transition point on the James. Five miles upstream is the mouth of the Chickahominy River, which adds a strong current of fresh water to the heavy flow already coming out of the James watershed from deep in Virginia's uplands, the mountains at the eastern edge of the Alleghany Plateau. In wet years, the water here is nearly fresh. The mouth of the James, however, lies close to the Chesapeake's mouth, so salt water can also flow upriver with the tides. In John Smith's time here, the region suffered a multi-year drought, so the river and the colonists' drinking water was probably brackish, an irritating factor that may account for some of the bickering and poor health that plagued them.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Fifteenth Congress of the United States of America
    H. R. 984 One Hundred Fifteenth Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen An Act To extend Federal recognition to the Chickahominy Indian Tribe, the Chickahominy Indian Tribe—Eastern Division, the Upper Mattaponi Tribe, the Rappahannock Tribe, Inc., the Monacan Indian Nation, and the Nansemond Indian Tribe. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thomasina E. Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition Act of 2017’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. TITLE I—CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE Sec. 101. Findings. Sec. 102. Definitions. Sec. 103. Federal recognition. Sec. 104. Membership; governing documents. Sec. 105. Governing body. Sec. 106. Reservation of the Tribe. Sec. 107. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights. TITLE II—CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE—EASTERN DIVISION Sec. 201. Findings. Sec. 202. Definitions. Sec. 203. Federal recognition. Sec. 204. Membership; governing documents. Sec. 205. Governing body. Sec. 206. Reservation of the Tribe. Sec. 207. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights. TITLE III—UPPER MATTAPONI TRIBE Sec. 301. Findings. Sec. 302. Definitions. Sec. 303. Federal recognition. Sec. 304. Membership; governing documents. Sec. 305. Governing body. Sec. 306. Reservation of the Tribe. Sec. 307. Hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, and water rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Experimental Autobiography from Counterculture Comics to Transmedia Storytelling: Staging Encounters Across Time, Space, and Medium
    Women's Experimental Autobiography from Counterculture Comics to Transmedia Storytelling: Staging Encounters Across Time, Space, and Medium Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Ohio State University Alexandra Mary Jenkins, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Jared Gardner, Advisor Sean O’Sullivan Robyn Warhol Copyright by Alexandra Mary Jenkins 2014 Abstract Feminist activism in the United States and Europe during the 1960s and 1970s harnessed radical social thought and used innovative expressive forms in order to disrupt the “grand perspective” espoused by men in every field (Adorno 206). Feminist student activists often put their own female bodies on display to disrupt the disembodied “objective” thinking that still seemed to dominate the academy. The philosopher Theodor Adorno responded to one such action, the “bared breasts incident,” carried out by his radical students in Germany in 1969, in an essay, “Marginalia to Theory and Praxis.” In that essay, he defends himself against the students’ claim that he proved his lack of relevance to contemporary students when he failed to respond to the spectacle of their liberated bodies. He acknowledged that the protest movements seemed to offer thoughtful people a way “out of their self-isolation,” but ultimately, to replace philosophy with bodily spectacle would mean to miss the “infinitely progressive aspect of the separation of theory and praxis” (259, 266). Lisa Yun Lee argues that this separation continues to animate contemporary feminist debates, and that it is worth returning to Adorno’s reasoning, if we wish to understand women’s particular modes of theoretical ii insight in conversation with “grand perspectives” on cultural theory in the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Books Added to the Collection: July 2014
    Books Added to the Collection: July 2014 - August 2016 *To search for items, please press Ctrl + F and enter the title in the search box at the top right hand corner or at the bottom of the screen. LEGEND : BK - Book; AL - Adult Library; YPL - Children Library; AV - Audiobooks; FIC - Fiction; ANF - Adult Non-Fiction; Bio - Biography/Autobiography; ER - Early Reader; CFIC - Picture Books; CC - Chapter Books; TOD - Toddlers; COO - Cookbook; JFIC - Junior Fiction; JNF - Junior Non Fiction; POE -Children's Poetry; TRA - Travel Guide Type Location Collection Call No Title AV AL ANF CD 153.3 GIL Big magic : Creative living / Elizabeth Gilbert. AV AL ANF CD 153.3 GRA Originals : How non-conformists move the world / Adam Grant. Irrationally yours : On missing socks, pick up lines, and other existential puzzles / Dan AV AL ANF CD 153.4 ARI Ariely. Think like a freak : The authors of Freakonomics offer to retrain your brain /Steven D. AV AL ANF CD 153.43 LEV Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner. AV AL ANF CD 153.8 DWE Mindset : The new psychology of success / Carol S. Dweck. The geography of genius : A search for the world's most creative places, from Ancient AV AL ANF CD 153.98 WEI Athens to Silicon Valley / Eric Weiner. AV AL ANF CD 158 BRO Rising strong / Brene Brown. AV AL ANF CD 158 DUH Smarter faster better : The secrets of prodctivity in life and business / Charles Duhigg. AV AL ANF CD 158.1 URY Getting to yes with yourself and other worthy opponents / William Ury. 10% happier : How I tamed the voice in my head, reduced stress without losing my edge, AV AL ANF CD 158.12 HAR and found self-help that actually works - a true story / Dan Harris.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Virginia's Long Seventeenth Century, 1550-1720: Previous Research and Future Directions
    The Archaeology of Virginia's Long Seventeenth Century, 1550-1720: Previous Research and Future Directions Dennis J. Pogue Time Line x 1561-66: Spanish expeditions from Havana and La Florida explore the Chesapeake Bay in search of trade routes to the west and to scout potential sites for settlement. x 1570: Jesuit priests establish the Ajacan mission on the York River in an attempt to Christianize the native Indians; the venture fails the next year when the priests are killed by the natives. x 1607: The English establish their first permanent settlement in Virginia when 104 colonists disembark at Jamestown Island and erect James Fort. x 1607-08: John Smith and his crew explore the Chesapeake Bay and its major tributaries by boat; the Englishmen record the locations of the Indian settlements they pass. x 1609-14: Colonists and the Powhatan Indians engage in a series of armed conflicts as the natives attempt to protect their rights to the land. x 1614: English settlers begin to cultivate tobacco, which becomes the primary source of wealth for the colony for the next 200 years. x 1617-22: Twenty-three "particular plantations," or subsidiary corporations controlled by stock holders, are created as part of an attempt to encourage immigration and the spread of settlement beyond Jamestown. x 1619: The first enslaved Africans are introduced to Virginia; the first representative legislative assembly is formed. x 1622: 200,000 pounds of tobacco are shipped out of Virginia; the homes of 1500 settlers spread for 50 miles along the James River; in response to the pressures of continued immigration of Englishmen, the Powhatan Indians attack and kill several hundred settlers in a series of coordinated attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Situation Report Stafford County, Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1975 Shoreline Situation Report Stafford County, Virginia Carl H. Hobbs III Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gary F. Anderson Virginia Institute of Marine Science Dennis W. Owen Virginia Institute of Marine Science Peter Rosen Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Hobbs, C. H., Anderson, G. F., Owen, D. W., & Rosen, P. (1975) Shoreline Situation Report Stafford County, Virginia. Special Report In Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 79. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/V5PB01 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shoreline Situation Report ST AFFORD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Special Report In Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 79 Chesapeake Research Consortium Report Number 13 Supported by the National Science Foundation, Research Applied to National Needs Program NSF Grant Nos. GI 34869 and GI 38973 to the Chesapeake Research Consortium, Inc. Published With Funds Provided to the Commonwealth by the Office of Coastal Zone Management National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Grant No. 04-5-158-50001 VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 1975 Shoreline Situation Report ST AFFORD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Special Report In Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 79 Chesapeake Research Consortium Report Number 13 Prepared by: Carl H.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Women and the Law, 1830 to 1934 Bethany Berger University of Connecticut School of Law
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Faculty Articles and Papers School of Law 1997 After Pocahontas: Indian Women and the Law, 1830 to 1934 Bethany Berger University of Connecticut School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_papers Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Berger, Bethany, "After Pocahontas: Indian Women and the Law, 1830 to 1934" (1997). Faculty Articles and Papers. 113. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_papers/113 +(,121/,1( Citation: 21 Am. Indian L. Rev. 1 1997 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Tue Aug 16 12:47:23 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0094-002X AFTER POCAHONTAS: INDIAN WOMEN AND THE LAW, 1830 TO 1934 Bethany Ruth Berger* Table of Contents I. Introduction . ..................................... 2 II. The Nineteenth Century and Indian Women: Federal Indian Policy and the Cult of True Womanhood ....................... 6 I. Federal and State Governments and Indian Women: As Them- selves, as Mothers, and as Wives ...................... 12 A. The Beginning: Ladiga's Heirs and Indian Women in Their Own Right ...................................... 12 B. Indian Women as Wives and Mothers: Intermarriage and Beyond . ........................................ 22 1. A Not So Brief Note on Intermarriage ................. 23 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocahontas's Two Rescues and Her Fluid Loyalty
    言語・地域文化研究 第 ₂6 号 2020 103 Pocahontas’s Two Rescues and Her Fluid Loyalty Hiroyuki Tsukada ポカホンタスの二つの助命と忠誠心の揺らぎ 塚田 浩幸 要 旨 ポカホンタスは、二度、ジョン・スミスの命を救った。一度目は有名な助命で、1607 年 12 月、インディアンの首長パウハタンによる処刑の寸前に、ポカホンタスが捕虜スミ スに自分の体をなげうって助命をした。これは、スミスの死と生まれ変わりを象徴的に 意味し、入植者をインディアンの世界に迎え入れる儀式で、ポカホンタスはスミスを救 うというあらかじめ決められた役割を担った。この一度目の助命の真偽については長ら く論争が行なわれてきたが、スミスが 1608 年 6 月の報告書簡でポカホンタスを「比類な き人物」と高く評価できたという事実は、助命が実際に起きたことを示している。その 6 月の時点で、スミスは助命の他に、取引や物資の提供と人質解放交渉の場面でポカホ ンタスと会う機会を持っていたが、それらの場面においては、スミスが「比類なき人物」 と評価することができるほどの行動をポカホンタスがとっていなかったからである。そ して、スミスがその報告書簡でポカホンタスを紹介したのは、入植事業の宣伝のために インディアンとの平和友好をアピールするねらいがあった。つまり、スミスに批判的な 研究者が主張するように、スミスがポカホンタスの人気にあやかって自分の名声をあげ るために助命を捏造したのではなく、助命に感銘を受けたスミスがポカホンタスの人気 を作り上げたといえるのである。 パウハタンは、一度目の助命でポカホンタスをインディアンと入植者の平和友好のシ ンボルとして仕立て上げ、その後の平和的な外交の場面にもポカホンタスを同行させて いた。しかしながら、二度目の助命は、パウハタンの外交方針に逆らって、ポカホンタ ス自身の意思によって行なわれた。1609 年 1 月、インディアンと入植者の関係が悪化す るなか、パウハタンがスミスを本当に襲おうとしているところをポカホンタスがスミス に密告して救った。この二つの助命のあいだの期間、ポカホンタスは入植者と頻繁に会 うなかで理解を深め、パウハタン連合のインディアンとしての忠誠心に揺らぎを生じさ せていたのである。つまり、ポカホンタスは、単なるパウハタンの遣いとしての平和友 好のシンボルであることをやめ、自らを平和友好の使者として確立させるに至ったので ある。 本稿の著作権は著者が保持し、クリエイティブ・コモンズ表示 4.0 国際ライセンス（CC-BY）下に提供します。 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ja 104 論文 ポカホンタスの二つの助命と忠誠心の揺らぎ （塚田 浩幸） Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. A special relationship between Pocahontas and John Smith 3. Refutation of all existing theories 4. Demonstration of the veracity of the rescue 5. Conclusion 1. Introduction Pocahontas saved John Smith twice. The frst instance came in December 1607, when she symbolically ofered her own head to save Smith’s
    [Show full text]
  • MAAC 2012 Preliminary Program Virginia Beach, VA March 23-25 8
    MAAC 2012 Preliminary Program March 23-25 Virginia Beach, VA Friday Morning, March 23 Track A Session 1: Archaeology of the 20th Century: Addressing the Recent Past Organized by Richard L. Geurcin (USDA Forest Service) 8:30 AM 8:50 AM Towards an Understanding of the 20th Century Guercin, Richard J. (USDA Forest Service) 8:50 AM 9:10 AM Finding the 20th Century Inside the 18th: Archaeology at Ogborne, Jennifer (College of William and the Menokin Site Mary/DATA Investigations, LLC) 9:10 AM 9:30 AM Deterioration and Rehabilitation of the Infrastructure on O Palus, Matthew (The Ottery Group) and P Streets in the Georgetown Neighborhood of Washington, D.C. 9:30 AM 9:50 AM The Missing Pieces of the 20th Century: Excavations at the Moore, Elizabeth A. (Virginia Museum of Natural Gravely House History) 9:50 AM 10:05 AM Break 10:05 AM 10:25 AM An Early Twentieth Century Ceramic Assemblage from a Garrow, Patrick H. (Cultural Resource Analysts, Burned House in Northern Georgia Inc.) 10:25 AM 10:45 AM From Timber to Town to Timber Again: The Story of the Barile , Kerri S. (Dovetail Cultural Resource Kress Box Factory in Brunswick, Virginia Group) and Kerry S. González (Dovetail Cultural Resource Group) 10:45 AM 11:05 AM A steppingstone of civilization”: The Hojack Swing Bridge Somerville, Kyle (University at Buffalo) and and Structures of Power in Monroe County, Western New Christopher Barton (Temple University) York State 11:05 AM 11:25 AM In Harm’s Way: The Hazard’s of Archaeological Field Madden, Michael (USDA Forest Service) Work Involving 20th Century Military Sites 11:25 AM 11:45 AM Saving the Present for the Future’s Past: Documenting Orr, David G.
    [Show full text]