DOCSLIB.ORG

The Salton Sea Authopity the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Salton Sea Authopity the U.S PPepaPed foP: The Salton Sea AuthoPity The U.S. Department of the Interior La Quinta, California Bureau of Reclamation Boulder City, Nevada PPepaPed by: TetPa Tech, Inc. San Bernardino, California Albuquerque, New Mexico CLASSICULTURALRESOURCESINVENTORY OF THE SALTON SEA REGION August 2002 Prepared for: Salton Sea Authority 78-401 Highway 111, Suite T La Quinta, CA 92253 and U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Lower Colo~ado Regional Office P.O. Box 61470 Boulder City, NV 89006 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. Albuquerque, New Mexico San Bernardino, California Brenda D. Smith, Jay von Werlhof, Kevin T. Doyle, Evelyn Chandler, Cary D. Cotterman Daniel Fait and Valerie M. Van Hemelryck CLASS I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY OPTHE SALTON SEA REGION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 INvENTORY BACKGROUND .................................................................................... l-1 1.2 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3 RESULTS OF INVENTORY: A SUMMARY .............................................................. 1-5 1.4 REPORT ORGANIZATION .......................................................................................... l-6 1.5 GENERAL TERMINOLOGY ....................................................................................... 1-7 2.0 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 CULTURAL RESOURCE RECORD SEARCHES ....................................................... 2-l 2.2 ETHNOGRAPHIC LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................... 2-2 2.3 NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCES DATA GATHERING ....................................... 2-2 2.4 ARCHIVAL RESEARCH .............................................................................................. 2-4 2.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES DATABASE ..................................................................... 2-5 2.6 DATA ANALYSIS ........................ ................................................................................ 2-6 2.6.1 Terminology ...................................................................................................... 2-7 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 PALEOENVIRONMENT .............................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 PRESENT ENVIRONMENT ........ ."................................................................................ 3-6 3.2.1 Physiography ..................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.2 Tectonics ............................................................................................................ 3-7 3.2.3 Soils ................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.2.4 Climate .............................................................................................................. 3-8 3.2.5 Floral Resources ................................................................................................ 3-8 3.2.6 Faunal Resources ................ .................................................. .- ................... .. ... .. 3-10 4.0 CULTURAL SETTING ............................................................................................................. .4-1 4.1 PRECONTACT HISTORY ............................................................................................ 4-I 4.1.1 The Paleoindian Period ( 12,000 to 7,000 Years BP ......................................... .4-2 4.1.2 The Archaic Period(? ,000 to 1,300 Years BP) ................................................ .4-5 4.1.3 The Patayan Period ( 1,300 Years BP to Contact) ............................................. .4-7 4.2 ETHNOHISTORY .........................................................................................................4-8 4.2.1 Takic Groups ........................................................................................ ............. 4-8 4.2.2 Patayan Groups ......................................................................................... .. ..... 4-16 4.3 POST-CONTACT HISTORY ...... ................................................................................ 4-25 4.3.1 Exploration .. .................................................................. .. .... ...................... .. .... 4-25 4.3.2 Transportation .................................................................................................. 4-30 4.3.3 Irrigation and the Creation of the Salton Sea................ .. ...... ............. ............. A-33 4.3.4 Mining ............................................................................................................. 4-38 4.3.5 Military ............................................................................................................ 4-43 4.3.6 Recreation ........................................................................................................ 4-44 4.3.7 Settlements in the Salton Sea Area ... .............................................................. A-45 5.0 RESEARCH CONTEXTS ........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 PRECONTACT HISTORY ............. ...............................................................................5-1 5 .1.1 Previous Regional Research .............................................................................. 5-I 5.1.2 Research Issues Pertinent to the Study Area .................................................... .S-2 5.2 POST-CONTACT HISTORY ........................................................................... _. ......... 5-10 5 .2.1 Previous Regional Research ............................................................................ 5-1 0 Tetra Tech, Inc. v August 2002 CLASS I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY OF THE SALTON SEA REGION 5.2.2 Research Issues Pertinent to the Study Area and Recorded Post-Contact Resources ......................................................................................................... 5-11 6.0 RESULTS OF INVENTORY ...................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 KNOWN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................ :.......... 6-1 6.1.1 Purported Resources .......................................................................................... 6-7 6.1.2 Architectural and Engineering Resources ......................................................... 6-8 6.1.3 Native American Resources ............................................ ................................ 6-12 6.1.4 Other Resources ...................................................................................... .. ....... 6-14 7.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS .................... 7-1 7.1 SITE DENSITY AND DISTRIBUTION ....................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 Site Density on Former U.S. Navy Salton Sea Test Base .................................. 7-l 7.2 PREDICTED SITE SENSITIVITY ............................................................................... 7-2 7.2.1 Precontact Sites .................................................................................................. 7-2 7.2.2 Post-Contact Sites .................... .... .. .................................................................. 7-12 7.2.3 Sensitivity Mapping ...................... ................................................................... 7-12 7.3 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS .......................................... ............................ 7-15 7.3.1 Restoration Alternatives and Recommendations .............................................7-16 8.0 REFERENCES ...... ........................... ............... .. ................................... ....... ... ............................. 8-1 9.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ............................................................................................................... 9-1 APPENDICES Appendix A Site List Appendix B Bibliography of Investigations LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1-1 Cultural Resources Identified Through Record Searches Conducted for Class I Inventory ...................................................................................................... .. .................................... 2-2 Table 2.3-1 Tribal Groups/Organizations Contacted for Salton Sea Restoration Project Data Gathering Efforts ..................................................... ................................... .. ....... .............................. 2-3 Table 6.1-1 Site Types of Precontact Archaeological Components Recorded within the 5-Mile Buffer Zone and Extended Project Area ......... .......... .................................. .. .. .. .............. ................... 6-2 Table 6.1-2 Precontact Site Activities and Constituents .. .. .. ...... ................................................................ 6-5 Table 6.1-3 Post-Contact Archaeological Sites Types and Subtypes Recorded within the Five-Mile Buffer zone and Extended Project Area Surrounding the Salton Sea ..............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 3.3 Geology Jan 09 02 ER Rev4
    3.3 Geology and Soils 3.3.1 Introduction and Summary Table 3.3-1 summarizes the geology and soils impacts for the Proposed Project and alternatives. TABLE 3.3-1 Summary of Geology and Soils Impacts1 Alternative 2: 130 KAFY Proposed Project: On-farm Irrigation Alternative 3: 300 KAFY System 230 KAFY Alternative 4: All Conservation Alternative 1: Improvements All Conservation 300 KAFY Measures No Project Only Measures Fallowing Only LOWER COLORADO RIVER No impacts. Continuation of No impacts. No impacts. No impacts. existing conditions. IID WATER SERVICE AREA AND AAC GS-1: Soil erosion Continuation of A2-GS-1: Soil A3-GS-1: Soil A4-GS-1: Soil from construction existing conditions. erosion from erosion from erosion from of conservation construction of construction of fallowing: Less measures: Less conservation conservation than significant than significant measures: Less measures: Less impact with impact. than significant than significant mitigation. impact. impact. GS-2: Soil erosion Continuation of No impact. A3-GS-2: Soil No impact. from operation of existing conditions. erosion from conservation operation of measures: Less conservation than significant measures: Less impact. than significant impact. GS-3: Reduction Continuation of A2-GS-2: A3-GS-3: No impact. of soil erosion existing conditions. Reduction of soil Reduction of soil from reduction in erosion from erosion from irrigation: reduction in reduction in Beneficial impact. irrigation: irrigation: Beneficial impact. Beneficial impact. GS-4: Ground Continuation of A2-GS-3: Ground A3-GS-4: Ground No impact. acceleration and existing conditions. acceleration and acceleration and shaking: Less than shaking: Less than shaking: Less than significant impact.
    [Show full text]
  • D.7 Cultural and Paleontological Resources
    Devers–Palo Verde No. 2 Transmission Line Project D.7 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES D.7 Cultural and Paleontological Resources D.7.1 Regional Setting and Approach to Data Collection This section discusses the cultural and paleontological resources located in the general area of the Pro- posed Project. Background information for the project area is provided (Section D.7.2 and D.7.3) along with a list of applicable regulations (Section D.7.4). Potential impacts and mitigation measures for the Proposed Project are outlined by segment in Sections D.7.6 and D.7.7. Project alternatives are addressed in Sections D.7.8 and D.7.9. A cultural resource is defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use, identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building and structural, and traditional resources (DSW EIR, 2005). Archaeological resources include both historic and prehistoric remains of human activity. Historic re- sources can consist of structures (cement foundations), historic objects (bottles and cans), and sites (trash deposits or scatters). Prehistoric resources can include lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Building and structural sites can vary from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, and cemeteries. A traditional cultural resource or traditional cultural property (TCP) can include Native American sacred sites (rock art sites) and traditional resources or ethnic communities important for maintaining the cul- tural traditions of any group. Paleontology is the study of life in past geologic time based on fossil plants and animals and including phylogeny, their relationships to existing plants, animals, and environments, and the chronology of the Earth's history.
    [Show full text]
  • People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: a Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2012 People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Deborah Confer University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas and Confer, Deborah, "People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada" (2012). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 98. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/98 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Pacific West Region: Social Science Series National Park Service Publication Number 2012-01 U.S. Department of the Interior PEOPLE OF SNOWY MOUNTAIN, PEOPLE OF THE RIVER: A MULTI-AGENCY ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW AND COMPENDIUM RELATING TO TRIBES ASSOCIATED WITH CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 2012 Douglas Deur, Ph.D. and Deborah Confer LAKE MEAD AND BLACK CANYON Doc Searls Photo, Courtesy Wikimedia Commons
    [Show full text]
  • 61 Pleistocene Lake Mojave Stratigraphy And
    HISTORY, PROCBSS, AND TRADITION: it SYMPOSIUM FOR MAKOTO KOnA 61 PLEISTOCENE LAKE MOJAVE STRATIGRAPHY AND ASSOCIATED CULTURAL MATERIAL CLAUDE N. WARREN AND JOAN S. SCHNEIDER The problems of geoarchaeology addressed in this paper were probably most clearly stated very early in the research, almost 40 years ago (Warren and DeCosta 1964). To adequately date the artifact assemblages from the 24 "surface sites" on the high beach lines of Pluvial Lake Mojave, two tasks must be successfully completed: (1) construct the geomorphic history of Lake Mojave from the strafigraphy, topographic re/afionships, radiocarbon dates, and any other useful data, and (2) demonstrate the stratigraphic relationship between prehistoric artifacts and lacustrine deposits of Lake Mojave. These two tasks are addressed in this paper, demonstrating the sequence of beach-ridge INTRODUCTION formation at Lake Mojave (Antevs 1937; Ore and Warren 1971; Wells et al. 1989). Additional data The Mojave River periodically flowed into from other locations within the range of elevations Death Valley during the late Pleistocene and early of the high beach ridges are integrated with Holocene. On its way to Death Valley, it filled observations made at the EI Capitan Beach the basins of today's Silver and Soda playas to Complex. overflow levels, forming Pleistocene (and early Holocene) Lake Mojave (Map 1). The final Within the uppermost portion of the Lake overflow stage of Pleistocene Lake Mojave was Mojave Basin are three high beach ridges referred probably about 9,000 years ago. With the to as BRI, BRII, and BRIll. These are the most increasing aridity of the early Holocene, the flow extensive shoreline features formed by the early of the Mojave River decreased, and by 7,500 years high stands of Lake Mojave.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Demography of Desert Mule Deer in Southeastern California
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 92(2):55-66 2006 DEMOGRAPHY OF DESERT MULE DEER IN SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA JASON P. MARSHAL School of Natural Resources University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 [email protected] LEON M. LESICKA Desert Wildlife Unlimited 4780 Highway 111 Brawley, CA 92227 VERNON C. BLEICH Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep Recovery Program California Department of Fish and Game 407 West Line Street Bishop, CA 93514 PAUL R. KRAUSMAN School of Natural Resources University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 GERALD P. MULCAHY California Department of Fish and Game P. O. Box 2160 Blythe, CA 92226 NANCY G. ANDREW California Department of Fish and Game 78-078 Country Club Drive, Suite 109 Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 Desert mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus eremicus, occur at low densities in the Sonoran Desert of southeastern California and consequently are difficult to monitor using standard wildlife techniques. We used radiocollared deer, remote photography at wildlife water developments (i.e., catchments), and mark-recapture techniques to estimate population abundance and sex and age ratios. Abundance estimates for 1999-2004 ranged from 40 to 106 deer, resulting in density estimates of 0.05-0.13 deer/km2. Ranges in herd composition were 41-74% (females), 6-31% (males), and 6-34% (young). There was a positive correlation (R = 0.73, P = 0.051) between abundance estimates and number of deer photographed/ catchment-day, and that relationship may be useful as an index of abundance in the absence of marked deer for mark-recapture methods. Because of the variable nature of desert wildlife populations, implementing 55 56 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME strategies that recognize that variability and conserving the habitat that allow populations to fluctuate naturally will be necessary for long-term conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G1:Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
    Appendix G1 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Draft CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Prepared By: ESA 626 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project site location: Cadiz, Cadiz Summit, Cadiz Lake NW, Cadiz Lake NE, Calumet Mine, Chubbuck, Milligan, East of Milligan, Danby Lake, Sablon, and Arica Mountains (CA) USGS 7.5’ Topographic Maps T1S R19E, 20E; T1N R18E, 19E; T2N R17E, 18E; 3N R16E, 17E; 4N R15E, 16E; 5N R14E, 15E Principal Investigator: Monica Strauss, M.A. Report Authors: Madeleine Bray, M.A, Candace Ehringer, M.A., Brian S. Marks, Ph.D. Keywords: San Bernardino County, Cadiz, Milligan, Archer, Freda, Chubbuck, Ward, Siam, Saltmarsh, Sablon, Fishel, Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, Parker Cutoff, General George Patton Desert Training Center, Railroad Siding, Archaeological Survey 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery,
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Traps on Ancient Shores
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2007 Fish traps on ancient shores Eric Stephen White University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation White, Eric Stephen, "Fish traps on ancient shores" (2007). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 2197. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/7v2b-4kwu This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FISH TRAPS ON ANCIENT SHORES By Eric Stephen White Master of Arts University of Nevada Las Vegas 2007 A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Anthropology Department of Anthropology and Ethnic Studies College of Liberal Arts Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas August 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1448429 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Report
    PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project Unincorporated Riverside County, California September 11, 2020 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project Unincorporated Riverside County, California Prepared for: Travis J. McGill Director/Biologist ELMT Consulting 2201 North Grand Avenue #10098 Santa Ana, California 92711 Prepared by: Principal Investigator David Brunzell, M.A., RPA Contributions by Nicholas Shepetuk, B.A., and Dylan Williams, B.A. BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 BCR Consulting LLC Project No. EMT2002 Site Recorded: Whitewater Levee Keywords: Levee USGS Quadrangles: 7.5-minute White Water, California (1988) Section 22 of Township 2 South, Range 3 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian September 11, 2020 SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMEN T WHITEWATER PRESERVE LEVEE PROTECTION PROJECT RIVERSIDE COUNTY MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to ELMT Consulting to conduct a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project (the project), consisting of 7.8 acres in unincorporated Riverside County, California. This work was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy requirements. During the current assessment, BCR Consulting completed a cultural resources records search summary, additional land use history research, and intensive field survey for the project site. The Eastern Information Center (EIC; the repository that houses cultural resources records for the project area) is closed to consultants in March 2020 due to Covid- 19 restrictions. Although the EIC has reportedly begun processing records search requests internally, we have not received results or estimated schedule for any requests since March.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Irrigation District Final EIS/EIR
    Contents Contents Section Page Preface/Abstract.................................................................................................................................iii List of Tables .....................................................................................................................................xv List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. xxi Acronyms.......................................................................................................................................xxvii Glossary ..........................................................................................................................................xxxv Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................ES-1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................ES-1 Project Background and History...................................................................................ES-2 Project Overview .............................................................................................................ES-3 Project Purpose, Need, and Objectives ........................................................................ES-6 Other Proposed Agreements, Plans, and Projects Related to Resources Affected by the Proposed Project..........................................................................ES-9
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
    Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES City of Banning General Plan WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT PURPOSE The Water Resources Element addresses water quality, availability and conservation for the City’s current and future needs. The Element also discusses the importance of on-going coordination and cooperation between the City, Banning Heights Mutual Water Company, High Valley Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency and other agencies responsible for supplying water to the region. Topics include the ground water replenishment program, consumptive demand of City residents, and wastewater management and its increasingly important role in the protection of ground water resources. The goals, policies and programs set forth in this element direct staff and other City officials in the management of this essential resource. BACKGROUND The Water Resources Element is directly related to the Land Use Element, in considering the availability of water resources to meet the land use plan; and has a direct relationship to the Flooding and Hydrology Element, in its effort to protect and enhance groundwater recharge. Water issues are also integral components of the following elements: Police and Fire Protection, Economic Development, Emergency Preparedness, and Water, Wastewater and Utilities. The Water Resources Element addresses topics set forth in California Government Code Section 65302(d). Also, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 21083.2(g), the City is empowered to require that adequate research and documentation be conducted when the potential for significant impacts to water and other important resources exists. Watersheds The westernmost part of the planning area is located at the summit of the San Gorgonio Pass, which divides two major watersheds: the San Jacinto River Watershed to the west and the Salton Sea watershed to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Forest Trees in California." 1976
    Map 52 86 Map 53 87 Map 54 (top) Map 55 (bottom) 88 Map 56 89 Map 57 (top) Map 58 (bottom) 90 Map 59 91 Map 60 (top) Map 61 (bottom) 92 Map 62 93 Map 63 94 Map 64 (top) Map 65 (bottom) 95 Map 66 96 Map 67 (top) Map 68 (bottom) 97 Map 69 98 Map 70 99 Map 71 (top) Map 72 (bottom) 100 Map 73 101 Map 74 102 Map 75 (top) Map 76 (bottom) 103 Map 77 (top) Map 78 (bottom) 104 Map 79 (top) Map 80 (bottom) 105 Map 81 106 Map 82 (top) Map 83 (bottom) 107 Map 84 108 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF PLACE NAMES Name Latitude (N) Longitude (W) Name Latitude (N) Longitude (W) Adin Pass 41°21' 120°55' Caliente 35°17.5' 118°37.5' Aetna Springs 38°39' 122°29' Caliente Mt. 35°02' 119°45.5' Alder Creek 35°52' 121°24' Callahan 41°18.5' 122°48' Amador City 38°25' 120°49.5' Canyon Creek 40°56' 123°01' Anastasia Canyon 36°20.5' 121°34' Canyon Creek Lakes 40°58.5' 123°01.5' Anchor Bay 38°48' 123°34.5' Carmel Valley 36°30' 121°45' Anderson Valley 39°00' 123°22' Cascade Canyon 34°12.5' 117°39' Antelope Valley 34°45' 118° 15' Castle Crags 41°11' 122°21' Applegate 39°00' 120°59.5' Castle Lake 41°13.5' 122°23' Arroyo Seco 36°16' 121°23' Castle Peak 39°22' 120°21' Asbill Creek 39°55.5' 123°21.5' Cedar Basin 40°11' 122°59' Ash Creek 40°28' 122°00' Cedar Mt.
    [Show full text]