WAC 296-54 WAC, Logging Operations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WAC 296-54 WAC, Logging Operations Chapter 296-54 WAC Introduction Safety Standards for Logging Operations _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Chapter 296-54 WAC Safety Standards for Logging Operations (Form Number F414-016-000) This book contains rules for safety standards for logging operations, as adopted under the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Chapter 49.17 RCW). The rules in this book are effective October 2017. A brief promulgation history, set within brackets at the end of this chapter, gives statutory authority, administrative order of promulgation, and date of adoption of filing. TO RECEIVE E-MAIL UPDATES: Sign up at https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/WADLI/subscriber/new?topic_id=WADLI_19 TO PRINT YOUR OWN PAPER COPY OR TO VIEW THE RULE ONLINE: Go to https://www.lni.wa.gov/safety-health/safety-rules/rules-by-chapter/?chapter=54/ DOSH CONTACT INFORMATION: Physical address: 7273 Linderson Way Tumwater, WA 98501-5414 (Located off I-5 Exit 101 south of Tumwater.) Mailing address: DOSH Standards and Information PO Box 44810 Olympia, WA 98504-4810 Telephone: 1-800-423-7233 For all L&I Contact information, visit https://www.lni.wa.gov/agency/contact/ Also available on the L&I Safety & Health website: DOSH Core Rules Other General Workplace Safety & Health Rules Industry and Task-Specific Rules Proposed Rules and Hearings Newly Adopted Rules and New Rule Information DOSH Directives (DD’s) See http://www.lni.wa.gov/Safety-Health/ Chapter 296-54 WAC Table of Contents Safety Standards for Logging Operations _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Chapter 296-54 WAC SAFETY STANDARDS FOR LOGGING OPERATIONS WAC Page 296-54-503 Variance. .................................................................. 1 WAC 296-54-505 Definitions. ..................................................... 1 WAC 296-54-507 Employer's responsibilities. ....................... 11 WAC 296-54-509 Employee's responsibility. ......................... 12 WAC 296-54-511 Personal protective equipment (PPE). ...... 12 WAC 296-54-51110 Head protection. .......................................................................... 13 WAC 296-54-51120 Eye and face protection. .............................................................. 13 WAC 296-54-51130 Hearing protection. ...................................................................... 14 WAC 296-54-51140 Hand protection. .......................................................................... 14 WAC 296-54-51150 Respiratory protection. ................................................................. 14 WAC 296-54-51160 Leg protection. ............................................................................. 14 WAC 296-54-51170 Foot protection. ............................................................................ 14 WAC 296-54-51190 Highly visible clothing. ................................................................. 15 WAC 296-54-513 Arrangement of work areas and emergency contact. ...................................................................................... 15 WAC 296-54-515 Accident prevention program. ................... 16 WAC 296-54-51510 Safety and health meetings. ........................................................ 17 WAC 296-54-51520 First-aid training. .......................................................................... 17 WAC 296-54-51530 First-aid kits. ................................................................................ 19 Page i Chapter 296-54 WAC Table of Contents Safety Standards for Logging Operations _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WAC 296-54-517 Lockout/tagout procedures. ....................... 20 WAC 296-54-519 Miscellaneous requirements. ..................... 21 WAC 296-54-520 Chain shot awareness and prevention. .... 22 WAC 296-54-52001 Chain shot awareness and prevention training. ........................... 22 WAC 296-54-52003 Cutting system inspection. ........................................................... 23 WAC 296-54-52005 Cutting system maintenance. ...................................................... 23 WAC 296-54-52007 Cutting system operation. ............................................................ 23 WAC 296-54-521 Motor vehicles. ............................................ 23 WAC 296-54-523 Inspection and repair of equipment and vehicles. ..................................................................................... 25 WAC 296-54-527 Seat belts. .................................................... 25 WAC 296-54-529 Overhead electrical lines clearance. ......... 26 WAC 296-54-531 Truck roads. ................................................. 26 WAC 296-54-533 Road pioneering and earthwork. ............... 28 WAC 296-54-535 Hand and portable powered tools. ............ 28 WAC 296-54-537 Chain saws. ................................................. 29 WAC 296-54-539 Falling and bucking—General. .................. 30 WAC 296-54-53910 Falling and bucking—Falling. ....................................................... 32 WAC 296-54-53920 Falling and bucking—Bucking. .................................................... 35 WAC 296-54-53930 Falling and bucking—Danger trees.............................................. 35 WAC 296-54-53940 Falling and bucking—Springboards and tree jacking. .................. 35 Page ii Chapter 296-54 WAC Table of Contents Safety Standards for Logging Operations _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WAC 296-54-541 Tree pulling. ................................................. 37 WAC 296-54-543 Mechanized falling. ..................................... 37 WAC 296-54-545 Climbing equipment and passline. ............ 37 296-54-547 Rigging—General. ................................................ 39 WAC 296-54-54710 Rigging—Inspection. .................................................................... 40 WAC 296-54-54720 Rigging—Molles........................................................................... 40 WAC 296-54-54730 Rigging—Shackles. ..................................................................... 40 WAC 296-54-54740 Rigging—Straps........................................................................... 41 WAC 296-54-54750 Rigging—Blocks. ......................................................................... 42 WAC 296-54-54760 Rigging—Hanging blocks. ........................................................... 43 WAC 296-54-54770 Chokers and butt rigging. ............................................................. 43 WAC 296-54-549 Selecting spar, tail and intermediate support trees. ............................................................................ 43 WAC 296-54-551 Raising and lowering portable spars or towers. ........................................................................................ 44 WAC 296-54-553 Metal spars. ................................................. 44 WAC 296-54-555 Metal spar guyline safety straps. ............... 46 WAC 296-54-557 Wire rope. ..................................................... 46 WAC 296-54-55710 Wire rope—Cutting. ..................................................................... 47 WAC 296-54-55720 Wire rope—Splicing. .................................................................... 47 WAC 296-54-55730 Wire rope—Attaching end fastenings. ......................................... 48 WAC 296-54-561 Guylines. ...................................................... 49 WAC 296-54-563 Guying tail/lift trees. .................................... 68 WAC 296-54-565 Intermediate support trees. ........................ 68 WAC 296-54-567 Rigging skylines. ......................................... 72 Page iii Chapter 296-54 WAC Table of Contents Safety Standards for Logging Operations _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WAC 296-54-569 Anchoring. ................................................... 74 WAC 296-54-571 Releasing spiked guylines and spiked skylines from anchors. ............................................................. 76 WAC 296-54-573 Logging machines—General. .................... 76 WAC 296-54-57310 Logging machines—Chipping in woods locations. ....................... 80 WAC 296-54-57315 Logging machines—Exhaust pipes. ............................................. 80 WAC WAC 296-54-57320 Logging machines—Glass. ................................................. 80 WAC 296-54-57325 Logging machines—Brakes. ........................................................ 80 WAC 296-54-57330 Logging machines—Outriggers. .................................................. 81 WAC 296-54-57335 Logging machines—Hydraulics. .................................................. 81 WAC 296-54-57340 Logging machines—A−frames. .................................................... 82 WAC 296-54-57345 Logging machines—Moving. ....................................................... 82 WAC 296-54-57350 Logging machines—Tractors and skidders. ................................. 83 WAC 296-54-57355 Logging machines—Protective structures for operators. ............. 83 WAC 296-54-575 Landing area. ............................................... 86 WAC 296-54-577 Yarding, skidding, landing. ........................ 87 WAC 296-54-579 Log decks. ..................................................
Recommended publications
  • Performance Analysis of Log Extraction by a Small Shovel Operation in Steep Forests of South Korea
    Article Performance Analysis of Log Extraction by a Small Shovel Operation in Steep Forests of South Korea Eunjai Lee 1 , Sang-Kyun Han 2 and Sangjun Im 3,* 1 National Institute of Forest Science, Forest Technology and Management Research Center, 498 Gwangneungsumogwon-ro, Soheul-eup, Pocheon 11186, Korea 2 Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries, 1515 Kongjwipatwji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju 54874, Korea 3 Department of Forest Sciences and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-880-4768 Received: 7 May 2019; Accepted: 11 July 2019; Published: 13 July 2019 Abstract: In South Korea, logs for low-value products, such as pulpwood and fuelwood, are primarily extracted from harvest sites and transported to roadside or landing areas using small shovels. Previous studies on log extraction, however, have focused on cable yarding operations with the goal of improving productivity on steep slopes and inaccessible sites, leaving small-shovel operations relatively unexamined. Therefore, the main objectives were to determine small-shovel extraction productivity and costs and to evaluate the impact of related variables on productivity. In addition, we developed a model to estimate productivity under various site conditions. The study took place in 30 case study areas; each area has trees with stems at a diameter at breast height ranging from 18 to 32 cm and a steep slope (greater than 15%). The areas ranged from 241 to 1129 trees per hectare, with conifer, deciduous, and mixed stands.
    [Show full text]
  • Logging Songs of the Pacific Northwest: a Study of Three Contemporary Artists Leslie A
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 Logging Songs of the Pacific Northwest: A Study of Three Contemporary Artists Leslie A. Johnson Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MUSIC LOGGING SONGS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST: A STUDY OF THREE CONTEMPORARY ARTISTS By LESLIE A. JOHNSON A Thesis submitted to the College of Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Music Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2007 The members of the Committee approve the Thesis of Leslie A. Johnson defended on March 28, 2007. _____________________________ Charles E. Brewer Professor Directing Thesis _____________________________ Denise Von Glahn Committee Member ` _____________________________ Karyl Louwenaar-Lueck Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank those who have helped me with this manuscript and my academic career: my parents, grandparents, other family members and friends for their support; a handful of really good teachers from every educational and professional venture thus far, including my committee members at The Florida State University; a variety of resources for the project, including Dr. Jens Lund from Olympia, Washington; and the subjects themselves and their associates. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Member Orientation Package Revised 2015
    SUS Member Orientation Package Revised 2015 We welcome you to Singles Under Sail, Inc. SUS members are required to meet certain education requirements. It is mandatory for all NEW members to have met the following requirements by their second membership renewal date: 1) To have completed the SUS Dockside Orientation Class (DOC), AND 2) To have passed either the U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary's or the U.S. Power Squadron's Basic Boating Course (8 hours minimum), OR provide proof of having held a U.S. Coast Guard Captain’s license, AND 3) To attend an SUS Member Orientation Class (MOC). See the SUS Bylaws (attached) for additional information. In the Member Orientation Class (which lasts approximately 1-1/2 hours) we will review SUS policies, procedures and guidelines and give you an opportunity to ask questions about the Club. The Dockside Orientation Class is approximately 4 hours and given on a docked boat (usually one of the SUS Skipper’s boats). We encourage everyone to enhance SUS sailing activities with sailing and boating classes. We believe it is important for all members to become active, contributing, participants in SUS. In return you can enjoy great sailing, programs and social events with some of the best people you may ever meet. This booklet contains all the information you will need to become an active participant in SUS. BRING THIS BOOK WITH YOU TO THE MOC. http://www.singlesundersail.org VISIT THE SUS WEBSITE singlesundersail.org for additional information and updates. The site requires a user name and password to access members only material.
    [Show full text]
  • Cable Yarding in North America and New Zealand: a Review of Developments and Practices
    Subject review Cable Yarding in North America and New Zealand: A Review of Developments and Practices Rien Visser, Hunter Harrill Abstract Cable yarders have been an integral part of harvesting timber on steep terrain for over 150 years. They have developed from basic labour intensive steam powered winch operations to sophisti- cated and automated mechanised systems. While European yarder development has focused on relatively small but highly mobile machines operating with standing skyline configurations, the North American and Southern Hemisphere developments have tended towards larger, taller and more powerful machines capable of higher daily production. Two dominant North American brands, Madill and Thunderbird, produced over 3000 yarders and many of their machines continue to work today. Often working with 4 or 5 drums, they were able to develop and utilise an expansive range of rigging configurations to suit different extraction needs. Modern developments continue to focus on increasing production capability and cost-effective- ness suited to clear-cut plantation forestry. With safety becoming more paramount in terms of a licence to operate, a strong preference is given to fully mechanised systems. By definition, these are yarders with rigging systems that support grapple carriages, extracting timber that has been mechanically felled on steep slopes. While mechanical grapple carriages have long been combined with swing yarder systems, the further development of a motorised grapple carriage allows tower yarders to operate without choker-setters. Ergonomic improvements for the operator, long established in European machinery, are being integrated including cab design with greatly improved visibility and partially automated electric over hydraulic control systems. Logic would suggest that, over time, yarder developments will combine the strength and robustness of North American design and the finesse and automation of European design.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackline Update
    A P R I L 2 0 2 1 JACKLINE INSURANCE PROGRAM 2021 NEWS & UPDATES FEAR NO HORIZON - INSURANCE FOR GLOBAL CRUISERS & LIVING ABOARD The Jackline Insurance Program by Gowrie Group is a comprehensive insurance program designed to protect yachts and their owners cruising throughout the world. Our marine insurance experts understand the cruising lifestyle, and work with our clients to create customized insurance solutions to align with cruising plans and coverage needs. The Jackline Program includes key protection important to cruisers, such as world-wide navigation, approval for living aboard with a crew of two, personal property coverage, mechanical breakdown, ice damage, pollution liability, reef damage liability, loss of use, and more. The program is endorsed by Seven Seas Cruising Association (SSCA), underwritten by Markel Insurance, and managed by Gowrie Group, a Division of Risk Strategies. CONTENTS INSURANCE MARKET - UPDATE FOR CRUISERS The insurance marketplace has experienced unprecedented forces and undergone significant changes in the past few years. 2020 presented not only a global pandemic, but also delivered a Fear No Horizon continuation of the multi-year trend of extremely active, destructive, and costly Atlantic Hurricane Seasons. Many insurance companies have reacted to the multi-year catastrophic losses, by reevaluating their rates and in some cases, exiting the marine insurance market. These changes Insurance Market Update have left thousands of boat owners with a policy scheduled for non-renewal, and limited options for how to secure new coverage. Did You Know? The Jackline Insurance Program, underwritten by Markel and managed by Gowrie Group, is proud to confirm that we are committed to our cruising clients, and we have no plans to exit from the marine insurance market.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Two Cable Yarder Technologies Performing Thinning Operations on a 33 Year Old Pine Plantation: a Potential Source of Wood for Energy
    energies Article A Comparative Analysis of Two Cable Yarder Technologies Performing Thinning Operations on a 33 Year Old Pine Plantation: A Potential Source of Wood for Energy Rodolfo Picchio 1,*, Rachele Venanzi 1, Nicolò Di Marzio 1, Damiano Tocci 1 and Farzam Tavankar 2 1 Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy; [email protected] (R.V.); [email protected] (N.D.M.); [email protected] (D.T.) 2 Department of Forestry, Khalkhal Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khalkhal 56817-31367, Iran; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 24 July 2020; Accepted: 14 October 2020; Published: 15 October 2020 Abstract: In central Italy, there are extensive European black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) plantations which range from 30 to 60 years of age and where no thinning operations have been made. The main purpose of this study was to provide a comparative analysis of two cable yarder technologies (Maxwald, mobile pulley carriage and Savall, semi-automatic carriage), in terms of fuelwood production and cost, from the first thinning of a 33 year old plantation in slope areas of these plantations. The results showed that fuelwood production was cost-effective in both systems (Savall by 15.1 and Maxwald by 3 14.8 ¿ m− ), although the productivity of the Savall system was higher than the Maxwald system 3 1 (6.1 vs. 5.7 m h− ). The respect amounts of productivity have the potential to increase by 27% for the Savall yarder and 25% for the Maxwald yarder upon condition that the delay times are reduced to minimum level by proper training of workers, by a better organization, and planning of operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Materials Forest Types and Treatments
    -- - Forestry Materials Forest Types and Treatments mericans are looking to their forests today for more benefits than r ·~~.'~;:_~B~:;. A ever before-recreation, watershed protection, wildlife, timber, "'--;':r: .";'C: wilderness. Foresters are often able to enhance production of these bene- fits. This book features forestry techniques that are helping to achieve .,;~~.~...t& the American dream for the forest. , ~- ,.- The story is for landolVners, which means it is for everyone. Millions . .~: of Americans own individual tracts of woodland, many have shares in companies that manage forests, and all OWII the public lands managed by government agencies. The forestry profession exists to help all these landowners obtain the benefits they want from forests; but forests have limits. Like all living things, trees are restricted in what they can do and where they can exist. A tree that needs well-drained soil cannot thrive in a marsh. If seeds re- quire bare soil for germination, no amount of urging will get a seedling established on a pile of leaves. The fOllOwing pages describe th.: ways in which stands of trees can be grown under commonly Occllrring forest conditions ill the United States. Originating, growing, and tending stands of trees is called silvicllllllr~ \ I, 'R"7'" -, l'l;l.f\ .. (silva is the Latin word for forest). Without exaggeration, silviculture is the heartbeat of forestry. It is essential when humans wish to manage the forests-to accelerate the production or wildlife, timber, forage, or to in- / crease recreation and watershed values. Of course, some benerits- t • wilderness, a prime example-require that trees be left alone to pursue their' OWII destiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Nesting Northern Goshawks to Logging Truck Noise Kaibab National Forest, Arizona
    RESPONSE OF NESTING NORTHERN GOSHAWKS TO LOGGING TRUCK NOISE KAIBAB NATIONAL FOREST, ARIZONA Teryl G. Grubb U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Flagstaff, Arizona Angela E. Gatto 8 May 2012 U.S. Forest Service North Kaibab Ranger District Kaibab National Forest Fredonia, Arizona Larry L. Pater Noise Consultant Champaign, Illinois David K. Delaney U.S. Army Research and Development Center Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Champaign, Illinois RESPONSE OF NESTING NORTHERN GOSHAWKS TO LOGGING TRUCK NOISE KAIBAB NATIONAL FOREST, ARIZONA Teryl G. Grubb U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Flagstaff, Arizona Angela E. Gatto U.S. Forest Service North Kaibab Ranger District Kaibab National Forest Fredonia, Arizona Larry L. Pater Noise Consultant Champaign, Illinois David K. Delaney U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Champaign, Illinois Final Report to Southwest Region (R-3) U.S. Forest Service 8 May 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At present log hauling is categorically precluded from northern goshawk (Accipter gentilis) post- fledging family areas (PFAs) on the Kaibab Plateau to the detriment of efficient U. S. Forest Service contract logging. The goal of the current research was to test sufficiently with a logging truck hauling near actively nesting goshawks to establish critical thresholds for distance and noise levels, as well as assess current levels of frequency/duration/timing, i.e., concentration of exposure. Collaboration with U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) and U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center/Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (ERDC/CERL) brought wildlife and acoustical expertise, as well as sophisticated, professional grade, recording equipment to the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Nautical Terms: English – Japanese
    Glossary of Nautical Terms: English – Japanese 2 Approved and Released by: Dal Bailey, DIR-IdC United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Interpreter Corps http://icdept.cgaux.org/ 6/29/2012 3 Index Glossary of Nautical Terms: English ‐ Japanese A…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…..pages 4 ‐ 6 B……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……. pages 7 ‐ 18 C………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………...pages 19 ‐ 26 D……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………..pages 27 ‐ 32 E……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….…………. pages 33 ‐ 35 F……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….………..……pages 36 ‐ 41 G……………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………...…………pages 42 ‐ 43 H……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….………………..pages 49 ‐ 48 I…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….……….……... pages 49 ‐ 50 J…………………………….……..…………………………………………………………………………………………….………... page 51 K…………………………………………………………………………………………………….….…………..………………………page 52 L…………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………….……..pages 53 ‐ 58 M…………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………....….. pages 59 ‐ 62 N……………….........................................................................…………………………………..…….. pages 63 ‐ 64 O……………………………………..........................................................................…………….…….. pages 65 ‐ 67 P……………………….............................................................................................................. pages 68 ‐ 74 Q………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….……...…… page 75 R………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….…………..
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Safety Solutions
    25 October 2017 ENGINEERING SAFETY SOLUTIONS Reducing the risk of falling from a Madill 124 swing yarder In a perfect world we strive to ELIMINATE risks to health and safety. As we know this is not always possible—either the tools or technology doesn’t exist or it will be financially unviable. So we are then required to take a closer look at how we could MINIMISE the risk. Options may include : • Substituting (totally or partially) the hazard that creates the risk with something of lesser risk, an example of this would be replacing manual felling with mechanized felling where possi- ble. • Isolating the hazard to prevent contact, an example of this would be temporary traffic con- trol when felling within two tree lengths of a road. • Implementing engineering controls, an example of this would be a cut-out or disable switch. These three types of controls are far more reliable than the next layer of controls…...that is rules and procedures, followed by the use of personal protective equipment. This layer of controls is prone to human failure. Engineering controls or engineering safety solutions is the subject of this case study. When working around forestry machines, one of our greatest risks is falling from heights. While working with haulers, some of the routine activities that is crucial to machine operation need to be done at an elevated position, sometimes as high as 14m from the ground. Although fall arrest harnesses are provided for this work, there is some doubt that they are used all the time. People have reported not using the harness because it’s difficult to fit it correctly, it takes time to fit, there is not enough attachment points on the machines, and that they “feel safe” going up the gantry ladder without a harness.
    [Show full text]
  • Specification SAILS & RIGS
    January 2014 Specification for SAILSetc International One Metre SAILS & RIGS prices valid for orders paid during 2014 SAILS No 1 £76.00 No 2 £80.25 No 3 £70.25 mainsail and headsail have the following features general features battens, tapered, self adhesive four panels in mainsails three panels in headsails (2 only in No 3) built in shaping at seams All sails NOT SEWN as standard luff shaping suitable for application eyelets, slides or small pocket luff finish on mainsails cloth suitable for application No 1 sails 50 micron film No 2 & No 3 sails 75 micron film headsail luff has a narrow pocket suitable for a 0.6 mm diameter forestay colour of tape light blue choose blue from black the grey list white pink red orange yellow corner reinforcements patches are self adhesive colour of reinforcement blue choose dark blue from black the grey list silver white pink dayglo red orange dayglo yellow dayglo SAILSetc cream options price slides for GROOVY mast (for No 1 mainsail) no charge eyelets for rings for round mast no charge non-standard cloth - other see note A non standard shaping see note A & B ‘finger’ patches £8.25 small pocket at luff for jackline £7.75 luff hooks for jackline £10.75 insignia & numbers added to each side of mainsail and headsail £14.50 national letters applied to each side of one mainsail £7.20 pair of tell tales on headsail £1.40 note A for one or more of the ‘non standard’ options please add per suit of sails £5.75 note B the shaping built into our sails has evolved over a long time and many generations of
    [Show full text]
  • Design Vehicle Configuration Analysis and CSA-S6-00 Implication Evaluation Phase II
    BUCKLAND & TAYLOR LTD. Bridge Engineering MINISTRY OF FORESTS Design Vehicle Configuration Analysis and CSA-S6-00 Implication Evaluation Phase II 2003 November 19 Our Ref: 1579 Prepared by: Darrel P. Gagnon, P.Eng. Reviewed by: Peter G. Buckland, P.Eng. BUCKLAND & TAYLOR LTD. 101-788 Harbourside Drive North Vancouver, BC, Canada V7P 3R7 Tel: (604) 986-1222 Fax: (604) 986-1302 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.b-t.com W:\1579\Phase II Final Report\Title.fm BUCKLAND & TAYLOR LTD. Bridge Engineering Executive Summary The Ministry of Forests (BCMoF) had previously commissioned Buckland & Taylor Ltd. to conduct of review of the Forest Service Bridge Design and Construction Manual and CAN/ CSA-S6-00 (CHBDC) to determine if the existing BCMoF Design Vehicle configurations are reasonably representative of the logging vehicles now being used in the BC forest industry and if these configurations are appropriate for use with the load factors in CHBDC. A survey of logging truck weights conducted by Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada (FERIC) provided the base data for this analysis and the results of this study were presented to the BCMoF in a report entitled ’MoF Design Vehicle Configuration Analysis and CSA-S6-00 Implication Evaluation’ dated 2003 January 04 (draft report dated 2002 May 13). Although the report made some recommendations for revisions to the L75 Design Vehicle and corresponding load factors, it was concluded that insufficient data was available to accurately assess the L100, L150 and L165 Design Vehicles or trucks conducting movements of logging equipment. Although truck loadings and bridge design capacity requirements could vary significantly between operationing regions and individual operators, comments received from personnel involved in the industry indicated that most companies were having forestry bridges designed for load levels that exceeded the maximum measured weights of most of the logging trucks.
    [Show full text]