Cap 2007 Car 1.Pdf (English)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chiara Caccia/COOPI/Bangui/2006 Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) The CAP is much more than an appeal for money. It is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of: • Strategic planning leading to a Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP); • Resource mobilisation (leading to a Consolidated Appeal or a Flash Appeal); • Coordinated programme implementation; • Joint monitoring and evaluation; • Revision, if necessary; and • Reporting on results. The CHAP is a strategic plan for humanitarian response in a given country or region and includes the following elements: • A common analysis of the context in which humanitarian action takes place; • An assessment of needs; • Best, worst, and most likely scenarios; • Stakeholder analysis, i.e. who does what and where; • A clear statement of longer-term objectives and goals; • Prioritised response plans; and • A framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if necessary. The CHAP is the foundation for developing a Consolidated Appeal or, when crises break or natural disasters strike, a Flash Appeal. Under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, the CHAP is developed at the field level by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Country Team. This team mirrors the IASC structure at headquarters and includes UN agencies and standing invitees, i.e. the International Organization for Migration, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and NGOs that belong to ICVA, Interaction, or SCHR. Non-IASC members, such as national NGOs, can be included, and other key stakeholders in humanitarian action, in particular host governments and donors, should be consulted. The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the annual preparation of the consolidated appeal document. The document is launched globally each November to enhance advocacy and resource mobilisation. An update, known as the Mid-Year Review, is to be presented to donors in July 2007. Donors provide resources to appealing agencies directly in response to project proposals. The Financial Tracking Service (FTS), managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is a database of donor contributions and can be found on www.reliefweb.int/fts In sum, the CAP works to provide people in need the best available protection and assistance, on time. ORGANISATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS DURING 2007: AARREC CESVI GSLG OCHA UNAIDS AASAA CHFI HDO OCPH UNDP ABS CINS HI ODAG UNDSS Abt Associates CIRID HISAN - WEPA OHCHR UNESCO ACF/ACH/AAH CISV Horn Relief PARACOM UNFPA ACTED CL INTERSOS PARC UN-HABITAT ADRA CONCERN IOM PHG UNHCR Africare COOPI IRC PMRS UNICEF AGROSPHERE CORD IRD PRCS UNIFEM AHA CPAR IRIN PSI UNMAS ANERA CRS JVSF PU UNODC ARCI CUAMM MALAO RFEP UNRWA ARM CW MCI SADO UPHB AVSI DCA MDA SC-UK VETAID CADI DRC MDM SECADEV VIA CAM EMSF MENTOR SFCG VT CARE ERM MERLIN SNNC WFP CARITAS EQUIP NA SOCADIDO WHO CCF FAO NNA Solidarités WVI CCIJD GAA (DWH) NRC SP WR CEMIR Int’l GH OA STF ZOARC CENAP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 1 Table I: Summary of Requirements – By Appealing Organisation and By Sector........................................ 2 2. 2006 IN REVIEW ............................................................................................................................................ 4 3. THE 2007 COMMON HUMANITARIAN ACTION PLAN............................................................................... 10 3.1 THE CONTEXT AND ITS HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES ............................................................................... 10 3.1.A The Context.................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.B The Humanitarian Consequences.................................................................................................. 12 3.2 SCENARIOS .............................................................................................................................................. 14 3.3 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES FOR HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE................................................................................ 15 3.4 RESPONSE PLANS .................................................................................................................................... 17 3.4.A Coordination and Support Services................................................................................................ 17 3.4.B Economic Recovery and Infrastructure (includes rehabilitation, income generation) ..................... 19 3.4.C Education ....................................................................................................................................... 21 3.4.D Food Security................................................................................................................................. 23 3.4.E Health............................................................................................................................................. 25 3.4.F Multi-Sector Assistance to Refugees .............................................................................................27 3.4.G Protection / Human Rights / Rule of Law ....................................................................................... 29 3.4.H Security of Staff and Operations .................................................................................................... 31 3.4.I Shelter and Non-Food Items .......................................................................................................... 32 3.4.J Water and Sanitation...................................................................................................................... 34 4. STRATEGIC MONITORING PLAN ............................................................................................................... 36 5. CRITERIA FOR PRIORITISATON OF PROJECTS ...................................................................................... 37 6. SUMMARY: STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE ......................................... 38 Table II: List of Projects – By Sector .......................................................................................................... 43 ANNEX I. POPULATION FIGURES .....................................................................................................48 ANNEX II. WHO DOES WHAT WHERE................................................................................................ 51 ANNEX III. AGENCY OVERVIEWS........................................................................................................ 52 ANNEX IV. MONITORING MATRIX FOR SECTOR OBJECTIVES........................................................ 58 ANNEX V. THE LINK BETWEEN HUMANITARIAN ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT.......................... 62 ANNEX VI. LIST OF USEFUL LINKS..................................................................................................... 65 ANNEX VII. DONOR RESPONSE TO THE 2006 APPEAL..................................................................... 66 ANNEX VIII. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................. 82 Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://www.humanitarianappeal.net PROJECT SUMMARY SHEETS ARE IN A SEPARATE VOLUME ENTITLED “PROJECTS” ii i i v COORDINATED AID PROGRAMME FOR CAR 2007 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Some facts about the Central African Republic (CAR): Almost one million struck by hostilities in the north; at least 100 villages burnt in the last year; Over 220,000 forced to flee their homes: 150,000 internally displaced; 70,000 left the CAR; Acute malnutrition at 4% and chronic malnutrition at 30% among children under five; Life expectancy is estimated at 41 years in 2007 (down from 48.7 in 1988); Maternal mortality stands at 1,355/100,000 in 2003 compared to 590/100,000 in Sudan; More than one child in five does not reach her/his fifth birthday; 17,150 infants died in 2006 due to lack of vaccination, proper nutrition, or safe drinking water; HIV prevalence of 10.7%: over 250,000 infected; over 140,000 orphans. The CAR hovers: pinched between Darfur and Chad on the one hand, with an armed rebellion and a bankrupt government on the other. A quarter of the country’s four million people are struck directly; a further million stand at the edge of risk. Regional dynamics and the success or failure of democratic consolidation and socio-economic recovery make the CAR one of the world’s most fragile yet unknown crises, and potentially a hotspot threatening international peace and security in Central Africa. Until 2005, the humanitarian drama in the CAR was one of the world’s most neglected emergencies. International attention rose in 2006 but the situation deteriorated severely in the north, leading to greater suffering there. Unless pressing humanitarian need in the north is addressed, it risks seeping south endangering current attempts at recovery. 2007 is critical for helping both those struck by waves of violence in the north and the most destitute working to re-establish their livelihoods elsewhere. It is also the year when the democratically elected government should prove its resilience. The international community therefore has an enormous role to play. This Coordinated Aid Programme, first and foremost, a joint attempt