Bereans Online Enews B"H Parashat Metzora - 'Leper' (Leviticus 14:1-15:33)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bereans Online Enews B Bereans Online eNews http://www.bereansonline.org B"H Parashat Metzora - 'Leper' (Leviticus 14:1-15:33) The name 'Metzora', the second portion for this week, comes from the second verse of Leviticus 14: Vayedaber HaShem el-Moshe lemor. zot tihye torat ha-metzora b'yom tahorato v'huva el-ha-kohen Then HaShem spoke to Moses, saying, "This shall be the law of the leper for the day of his cleansing: He shall be brought to the priest." Leviticus 14:1-2 Previously, in Parashat Tazria we are given some detailed instructions regarding what our English BiBles call "a leper." Continuing in Parashat Metzora, the topic of "leprosy" continues. If you ever hope to unravel these passages, and the passages in the Gospel accounts you must learn to look Beyond this English word. The people in Scripture who are afflicted with tza'arat do not have "Hanson's Disease" or what is known as "leprosy" In fact, if one examines the use of this HeBrew word in Scripture you will find that it is not even a physical disease in the normal sense. Yes, it has physical attriButes, which make it appear that the person who is afflicted is a "dead man walking" - But it is not the disease that is Being addressed in these passages. A common misunderstanding of those reading these passages (and the Gospels) is that the person with tza'arat has a communicable disease, and hence G-d is mandating Quarantine for medical reasons. Nothing could Be further from the truth. We read in last week's parasha that a priest was to examine a person who suspected they had tza'arat, and determine if the person had tza'arat or not [were "unclean" or not]. If they had tza'arat, they had to withdraw from the community and were forBidden to approach G-d in the Mish'kan or the Temple. However, if tza'arat were only a disease, the following would make no sense: And if tza'arat breaks out all over the skin, and the tza'arat covers all the skin of the one who has the sore, from his head to his foot, wherever the priest looks, then the priest shall consider; and indeed if the tza'arat has covered all his body, he shall pronounce him clean who has the sore. It has all turned white. He is clean. Leviticus 13:12-13 So, someone with a "little" Bit of tza'arat was considered unclean, But someone with it covering their whole Body, was welcomed Back into the community and could approach the altar in the Mish'kan. Beloved, there is more to this "leper" stuff than meets the eye. Much more. For instance, the Talmud has some interesting titles for Messiah. One of them is "Leper Messiah," which draws from Isaiah 53 (yes, many of the Sages did consider Isaiah 53 to Be a Messianic passage, no matter what you have Been told [b.Sanhedrin 98a]). If we revere every word that G-d has spoken, these chapters regarding "leprosy" are worthy of some deeper investigation. There is much here, and like all things that "make no sense" in Scripture... it is all Messianic. We can learning something from the word tza'arat itself. The root is tzara (tza'arat is a grammatical variation of "tzara"). Your handy Strong's will Be of little help. It simply says, "leprous, having a skin disease". A Better approach is to examine context, and every usage. Some very interesting things will come from that. First though, let's look at the pictograph that the ancient HeBrew makes for us. Tzara is spelled tzadi-resh-ayin. The letter tzadi looks like a man kneeling in humility. The word for "righteous one" comes from this letter/word. The letter resh represents a head of a man and most often represents pride. The letter ayin looks like an eye. In fact, that is the HeBrew word for "eye"= ayin. The pictograph tells us, "whether a man (or woman) is humBle or proud will Be seen". Tza'arat is about taking what is unseen, and inside a person, and making it visiBle. A metzora [incorrectly translated "leper"] is a person in the process of having what is inside Brought to the surface, or their skin. Let's see if a look at context Bears this out. The first usage of tzara is found in Exodus 4:6-7. This is where Moses is Being sent By G-d to the elders of the Children of Israel to tell them that G-d is going to redeem them from slavery. Moses protests that they will not hear his voice; so G-d gives him three signs that he can show the elders: 1. His rod into a serpent. 2. His hand turns leprous and then Back. 3. Water to Blood when poured on dry land. Now Because the first and the last sign were used with Pharaoh, you may not have caught that these three signs were to Be shown to the elders of Israel. What are these three signs? They all relate to the Garden and they are all related to tamei [unclean]. 1. The Serpent in the Garden = the serpent, an unclean animal. 2. The day they ate of the Fruit, they "died" = Tza'arat, the walking death. 3. Blood of the animal that died to clothe them, poured out on the ground = water turned to Blood, poured out on the ground. What you see is the Beginning of a hint that this whole tamei tahor thing is related to the Garden of Eden Because it is related to the Mish'kan, the Tabernacle. The Garden is the last place where man and the Holy One, Blessed is He, walked together - where man could approach G-d and not Be consumed. The serpent has an interesting connection to tza'arat. It sheds its skin. Essentially, tza'arat is the worse form of tamei that a person can come into contact with. It is only outdone By a dead human Being. It is why tza'arat is considered a picture of death. The next place after these passages in Leviticus that we see tza'arat is in Numbers 12:1-16. This is where Moses' sister Miriam spoke against Moses Being 'G-d's spokesman'. Miriam was a prophetess, had spoken G-d's words - and yet she spoke against Moses Because she did not consider the fact that G-d spoke to Moses in an entirely different way: face to face. Listen how this passage descriBes Moses: Now the man Moses was very humble, more than all men who were on the face of the earth. Numbers 12:3 But Miriam was the opposite in this instance (Bitterly prideful). She was struck with tza'arat. Aaron immediately cries out: Please do not let her be as one dead, whose flesh is half consumed when he comes out of his mother's womb! Numbers 12:12 Moses also pleads for Miriam and after seven days she is clean and permitted Back into the camp. From these and other instances, the Sages derived their position that internal Bitterness, expressed often By Bitter words against a Brother, is the source of tza'arat. It is an interesting position. When one examines the instructions for Being removed from the community and then returning to the community it does seem to indicate that tza'arat provides a time for "what is inside" to get out. Tza'arat, is one reason that lashona hara [gossip, and complaining against a Brother] is so strongly spoken against in Judaism and some Messianic communities. Hmm, a peek into the Apostolic Scriptures will reveal the same seriousness regarding Bitterness and evil-speaking against one another. Apparently we all need a little caution Before we "share a prayer reQuest" about a Brother or sister in Messiah. So, now that we have a framework for tza'arat, what is this process we are reading about in Leviticus 14 regarding how a metzora [one afflicted with tza'arat] is to Be declared tahor [clean] and able to return to the community and approach G-d in the Mish'kan? It is about the "Leper Messiah." There were three main periods of tza'arat in Israel's history. There was the time around the coming out of Egypt and slavery. There was the time around the ministries of Elijah and Elisha; and there was the First Century during the three year ministry of Yeshua. During each of those periods, there was a Mish'kan or a Temple. Since the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, there have not Been significant instances of tza'arat. Tza'arat was an affliction that the metzora had to experience outside the community - essentially cut off from the people, But more importantly: cut off from the manifest Presence of G-d in the Mish'kan or the Temple. That is why the following account is so precious: And behold, a metzora [leper] came and worshiped Him, saying, 'L-rd, if You are willing, You can make me tahor [clean].' Then Yeshua put out His hand and touched him, saying, 'I am willing; be tahor.' Immediately his tza'arat was tahor. And Yeshua said to him, 'See that you tell no one; but go your way, show yourself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, as a testimony to them.' Matthew 8:2-4 The metzora could not go into the Temple... so the "Temple" came to him. The "Leper Messiah" - One who heals and cares for metzorim.
Recommended publications
  • The Healing of Naaman in Missiological Perspective Walter A
    Volume 61: Number 3 July 1997 Table of Contents Eschatological Tension and Existential Angst: "Now" and "Not Yet" in Romans 214-25 and lQSll (Community Rule, Manual of Discipline) Lane A. Burgland ........................... 163 The Healing of Naaman in Missiological Perspective Walter A. Maier I11 .......................... 177 A Chapel Sermon on Exodus 20:l-17 JamesG. Bollhagen ......................... 197 Communicating the Gospel Without Theological Jargon Andrew Steinman .......................... 201 Book Reviews .................................... 215 Salvation in Christ: A Lutheran-Orthodox Dialogue. Edited with an Introduction by John Meyendorff and Robert Tobias .......................Ulrich Asendorf A History of the Bible as Literature. By David Norton. ................................ Cameron A. MacKenzie Ministry in the NmTestament. By David L. Bartlett .................................... Thomas M. Winger The Justificationof the Gentiles: Paul's Letters to the Galatians and Romans. By Hendrikus Boers ........Charles A. Gieschen Christianity and Christendom in the Middle Ages: The Relations Between Religion, Church, and Society. By Adriaan H. Bredero ...................Karl F. Fabrizius The Myste y and the Passion: A Homiletic Reading of the Gospel Traditions. By David G. Buttrick ...... Carl C. Fickenscher I1 Christ in Christian Tradition. By Aloys Grillrneier with Theresia Hainthaler ................. William C. Weinrich Theological Ethics of the New Testament. By Eduard Lohse ...................................H. Armin Moellering Paul's Narrative Thought World:The Tapestry of Tragedy and Triumph. By Ben Witherington .........Charles A. Gieschen Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible. By Richard J.Blackwell. ................................Cameron A. MacKenzie Teaching Law and Gospel. By William Fischer ... Erik J. Rottmann Books Received. .................................. 238 The Healing of Naaman in Missiological Perspective Walter A. Maier I11 This study analyzes the narrative of the healing of Naaman the Syrian, 2 Kings 53-19a.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection Or Miraculous Cures? the Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against Its Ancient Near Eastern Background
    Bar, “Resurrection or Miraculous Cures?” OTE 24/1 (2011): 9-18 9 Resurrection or Miraculous Cures? The Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against its Ancient Near Eastern Background SHAUL BAR (UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS) ABSTRACT The Elijah and Elisha cycles have similar stories where the prophet brings a dead child back to life. In addition, in the Elisha story, a corpse is thrown into the prophet’s grave; when it comes into con- tact with one of his bones, the man returns to life. Thus the question is do these stories allude to resurrection, or “only” miraculous cures? What was the purpose of the inclusion of these stories and what message did they convey? In this paper we will show that these are legends that were intended to lend greater credence to prophetic activity and to indicate the Lord’s power over death. A INTRODUCTION There is consensus among scholars that Dan 12:2-3, which they assign to the 1 second century B.C.E., refers to the resurrection of the dead. The question be- comes whether biblical texts earlier than this era allude to this doctrine. The phrase “resurrection of the dead” never appears in the Bible. Scholars searching for biblical allusions to resurrection have cited various idioms.2 They list verbs including “arise,”3 “wake up,”4 and “live,”5 all of which can denote a return to life. We also find “take,”6 which refers to being taken to Heaven, the noun “life,”7 and “see.”8 In the present paper however, we shall examine the stories of the Elijah and Elisha cycles which include similar tales in which the prophet brings a dead child back to life: in Elijah’s case, the son of the widow of Zare- phath (1 Kgs 17:17-24); in Elisha’s, the son of the Shunammite matron (2 Kgs 4:31-37).
    [Show full text]
  • The Perfect Priest: an Examination of Leviticus 21:17-23 Jared Wilson George Fox University
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Seminary Masters Theses Seminary 1-1-2013 The perfect priest: an examination of Leviticus 21:17-23 Jared Wilson George Fox University This research is a product of the Master of Arts in Theological Studies (MATS) program at George Fox University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Wilson, Jared, "The perfect priest: an examination of Leviticus 21:17-23" (2013). Seminary Masters Theses. Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/seminary_masters/7 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Seminary at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seminary Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY THE PERFECT PRIEST- AN EXAMINATION OF LEVITICUS 21:17-23 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GEORGE FOX EVANGELICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS (THEOLOGICAL STUDIES) BY JARED WILSON PORTLAND, OREGON FEBRUARY 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Jared Wilson All rights reserved To Courtney, Jeremiah, Micah, Jedidiah, and Adley Contents Preface....................................................................................................................................... iv Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... vi Chapter One .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus, Elisha, and Moses: a Study in Typology
    Running head: JESUS, ELISHA, AND MOSES 1 Jesus, Elisha, and Moses: A Study in Typology Jeremy Tetreau A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2018 JESUS, ELISHA, AND MOSES 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Donald Fowler, Th.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Harvey Hartman, Th.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Mark Harris, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Cindy Goodrich, Ed.D., M.S.N., R.N., C.N.E. Assistant Honors Director ______________________________ Date JESUS, ELISHA, AND MOSES 3 Abstract Because the Evangelists wrote with the intention of communicating specific, theological truths to their readers, the details they include in their gospels are important. Further, one way the story of the Bible unfolds and is theologically interpreted is through the use of repetition and typology. A number of the miracle accounts of Elisha are analogous to Jesus’ own miracles as recorded in the gospels. Because of this, it is likely that the Evangelists are inviting readers to understand Jesus in light of Old Testament prophets and events, specifically as the appearance of a Prophet-like-Moses. A Jesus-Elisha typology, then, must be understood as only one strand of this more intricate prophetic typology. JESUS, ELISHA, AND MOSES 4 Jesus, Elisha, and Moses Introduction The writers of the four canonical gospels were not mere biographers; they were theologians. They were propagandists in the best possible way. They were the Evangelists, tasked with the sacred privilege of faithfully compiling eyewitness testimony and portraying Jesus “as these eyewitnesses portrayed him,” giving that testimony “a permanent literary vehicle.”1 Luke informs us that his gospel was written “so that you may know the exact truth about the things you [Theophilus] have been taught” (Lk.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on 2 Kings 202 1 Edition Dr
    Notes on 2 Kings 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable Second Kings continues the narrative begun in 1 Kings. It opens with the translation of godly Elijah to heaven and closes with the transportation of the ungodly Jews to Babylon. For discussion of title, writer, date, scope, purpose, genre, style, and theology of 2 Kings, see the introductory section in my notes on 1 Kings. OUTLINE (Continued from notes on 1 Kings) 3. Ahaziah's evil reign in Israel 1 Kings 22:51—2 Kings 1:18 (continued) 4. Jehoram's evil reign in Israel 2:1—8:15 5. Jehoram's evil reign in Judah 8:16-24 6. Ahaziah's evil reign in Judah 8:25—9:29 C. The second period of antagonism 9:30—17:41 1. Jehu's evil reign in Israel 9:30—10:36 2. Athaliah's evil reign in Judah 11:1-20 3. Jehoash's good reign in Judah 11:21—12:21 4. Jehoahaz's evil reign in Israel 13:1-9 5. Jehoash's evil reign in Israel 13:10-25 6. Amaziah's good reign in Judah 14:1-22 7. Jeroboam II's evil reign in Israel 14:23-29 8. Azariah's good reign in Judah 15:1-7 9. Zechariah's evil reign in Israel 15:8-12 10. Shallum's evil reign in Israel 15:13-16 11. Menahem's evil reign in Israel 15:17-22 12. Pekahiah's evil reign in Israel 15:23-26 13. Pekah's evil reign in Israel 15:27-31 Copyright Ó 2021 by Thomas L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sephardi Bulletin
    SBthe sephardi bulletin Picture courtesy of Artist Bettina Caro the magazine of the Spanish & Portuguese Jews’ Congregation Sept 2014 Vol 69 No 4 the sephardi bulletin 2 Ashworth Road, London W9 1JY tel: 020 7289 2573 fax: 020 7289 2709 [email protected] www.sandp.org editor Alison Rosen advertising Al Goncalves tel: 020 7432 1303 contributions Any submissions for inclusion in the bulletin should be sent to the editor at [email protected]. Text should be typed and sent as a Microsoft Word document. Photographs or illustrations should be sent as either tiff or jpeg files, and should be emailed or sent on CD. Only high resolution images can be used. The next issue will be published shortly before Chunukah and will cover the period up to shortly before Pesach. The deadline for submissions is 24 October 2014 environmental policy The paper used in the printing of the Sephardi Bulletin is made from pulp manufactured using timber from sustainable forests. This timber is treated as a crop and is managed by replanting programmes which exceed the quantity of felled trees. The pulp is bleached without the use of chlorine gas, carries the Forest Stewardship Council trademark, and also has an iso 14001 accreditation — an international voluntary standard for environmental management, the aim of which is to support environmental protection and prevention of pollution in balance with socioeconomic needs. To find out how you can respect the environment in line with Jewish laws and teachings, visit www.biggreenjewish.org. Message from Rabbi Joseph Dweck Rosh HaShana 5775: Today the World Was Conceived “What day is it?” “It’s today,” squeaked Piglet.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Studies: Balaam Oracles
    BIBLE STUDIES. By M. M. KALISCH, PH. D., M.A. PART 1. THE PROPHECIES OF BALAAM (NUMBERS XXII. to XXIV) OR THE HEBREW AND THE HEATHEN. LONDON: LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO. 1877 Public Domain Digitized by Ted Hildebrandt 2004 PREFACE. ALMOST immediately after the completion of the fourth volume of his Commentary on the Old Testament, in 1872, the author was seized with a severe and lingering illness. The keen pain he felt at the compulsory interrup- tion of his work was solely relieved by the undiminished interest with which he was able to follow the widely ram- ified literature connected with his favourite studies. At length, after weary years of patience and ‘hope deferred,’ a moderate measure of strength seemed to return, inadequate indeed to a resumption of his principal task in its full ex- tent, yet, sufficient, it appeared, to warrant, an attempt at elucidating some of those, numerous problems of Biblical criticism and religious history, which are still awaiting a final solution. Acting, therefore, on the maxim, ‘Est quadam prodire tenus, si non datur ultra,’ and stim- lated by the desire of contributing his humble share to the great intellectual labour of our age, he selected, as a first effort after his partial recovery, the interpretation of that exquisite episode in the Book of Numbers which contains an account of Balaam and his prophecies. This section), complete in itself, discloses a deep insight into the nature and course of prophetic influence; implies most instructive hints for the knowledge of Hebrew doctrine; and is one of the choicest, master-pieces of universal literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elisha Stories As Saints’ Legends
    The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures ISSN 1203-1542 http://www.jhsonline.org and http://purl.org/jhs Articles in JHS are being indexed in the ATLA Religion Database, RAMBI, and BiBIL. Their abstracts appear in Religious and Theological Abstracts. The journal is archived by Library and Archives Canada and is accessible for consultation and research at the Electronic Collection site maintained by Library and Archives Canada (for a direct link, click here). VOLUME 8, ARTICLE 5 YAEL SHEMESH, THE ELISHA STORIES AS SAINTS’ LEGENDS 1 JOURNAL OF HEBREW SCRIPTURES 2 THE ELISHA STORIES AS SAINTS’ LEGENDS YAEL SHEMESH, DEPARTMENT OF BIBLE, BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY, ISRAEL The present article seeks to define the literary genre of the Elisha cycle of stories. Let me state at the outset that I agree with the widespread view that these tales are intended to praise Elisha and belong to the genre of Saints’ legends or prophetic hagiography.1 But many have challenged this classification, which has generally been made intuitively and not been backed by solid proofs;2 some scholars have assigned all or some of the stories to different categories. What is more, in recent years we have been increasingly exposed to the argument that one or another of the Elisha stories, or even the entire cycle, is critical of the prophet, as a subversive reading of the text makes clear. For this reason, before I defend the genre assignment I accept I will review and refute the opinions voiced by various scholars (Part I). Next I will parry the contention that the Elisha stories disparage the prophet (Part II).
    [Show full text]
  • Parashah Balak Numbers 22:2-40 Chavurah Shalom 1/20/18 up Until
    Parashah Balak Numbers 22:2-40 Chavurah Shalom 1/20/18 Up until the Israelites came upon the scene, the Moabites were vassal to Sihon, King of the Amorites, Numbers 21:26. Balak was most likely set up as king by the Amorites, due to his loyalty to them. The Name Balak comes from a root word in Hebrew which means “to lay waste,” and thus some have named Balak “the devastator.” No wonder they faced Israel with fear and dread – they successfully wiped out the very one who had defeated them, Sihon, King of the Amorites. But God had graced the children of Moab with their land because of Abraham’s prayers for Lot. Abraham’s long prayer and deliberation with God over Lot occurred in Genesis 18:16-33 – Deuteronomy 2:9 records God’s gifting of land to the descendants of Lot. It was after the departure of Lot that God declared that Canaan would be the land of Promise to Abraham and his seed, Genesis 13:14-16. The Midianites were the descendants of Abraham and Keturah, Genesis 25:1-6. They were something of a Nomadic tribe, who existed in Arabia, Sinai, Egypt and occasional forays into Canaan. Exodus 2:15-22; Numbers 10:29; Genesis 37:25-36; Judges 6:1-6. The fact that Moab dealt with the elders of Midian suggests Midian was not a kingdom. There is evidence that there were up to 5 separate nomadic groups of Midianites, that could be found some among the Israelites, some among the Moabites, and among some of the other nations associated with the East such as Amalekites and Amorites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gehazi Syndrome: Suffering Familiarity with the Holy
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Faculty Publications 5-2010 The Gehazi Syndrome: Suffering Familiarity With the Holy Gerald A. Klingbeil Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs Recommended Citation Klingbeil, Gerald A., "The Gehazi Syndrome: Suffering Familiarity With the Holy" (2010). Faculty Publications. 3234. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs/3234 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. G ERALD A . KLINGB EIL Gerald A. Klingbeil, DLitt, is an associate editor of the Adventist Review and Adventist World magazines. He is also research professor of Old Testament and Ancient Near Eastern Studies at the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary, Andrews University Berrien Springs, Michigan, United States. The Gehazi syndrome: Suffering familiarity with the Holy udolf Otto, professor of close quarters the ministry of one of Aramean courtier—facing not only a systematic theology in the most amazing prophets of Israel. medical emergency but even more different German universi- Yes, Elisha had received a double so, social isolation and oblivion—to Rties at the beginning of portion of God’s Spirit (2 Kings 2:9), the prophet in Israel. Gehazi must the twentieth century, published a and the
    [Show full text]
  • The Theology of the Balaam Oracles: a Pagan Diviner and the Word of God
    THE THEOLOGY OF THE BALAAM ORACLES: A PAGAN DIVINER AND THE WORD OF GOD A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Dallas Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Theology by Ronald Barclay Allen © 1973; Ronald Allen report any errors to Ted Hildebrandt at [email protected] Cited with permission. Accepted by the Faculty of the Dallas Theological Seminary in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Theology. Examining Committee Bruce K. Waltke Kenneth Barker Charles C. Ryrie THE THEOLOGY OF THE BALAAM ORACLES: A PAGAN DIVINER AND THE WORD OF GOD Ronald Barclay Allen, Th. D. The aim of this thesis is to explore, exegete and display the riches of the oracles of Balaam (Numbers 22-24) as they related to the broad history of Old Testament studies, and more particularly to Old Testament theology. The oracles of Balaam are a fitting corpus for such a task as they have long been regarded as both a test case for literary criticism and as the quintessence of Pentateuchal theology. The study begins with a survey of the employment of the oracles of Balaam as used at Qumran, and by Bar Kochba, the Church Fathers, and the Talmud. Possible references to Balaam in the Quran are also discussed. Since the oracles of Balaam have long been regarded as the test case for literary criticism, a rather thorough study is made of the reconstructions of the Balaam materials by a number of leading scholars, including Wellhausen, Lohr, Mowinckel, Burrows, Albright, von Pakozdy, and Eissfeldt.
    [Show full text]
  • Parashat Tazria — Leviticus 12:1 – 13:59
    Parashat Tazria — Leviticus 12:1 – 13:59 Lev 12:1 Then Adonai spoke to Moses saying: Lev 12:2 “Speak to Bnei-Yisrael, instructing: If a woman conceives and bears a male child, then she will be unclean for seven days, as in the days of her niddah she will be unclean. Lev 12:3 In the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin is to be circumcised. Lev 12:4 She must wait during the blood of purification for 33 days. She is not to touch any holy thing, nor come into the Sanctuary, until the days of her purifying are completed. Lev 12:5 But if she bears a female child, then she will be unclean for two weeks, as in her niddah, and she is to wait in the blood of purification for 66 days. Lev 12:6 “When the days of her purification are completed for a son or for a daughter, she is to bring to the kohen, at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting, a year old lamb for a burnt offering and a young pigeon or a turtledove, for a sin offering. Lev 12:7 He is to present it before Adonai and make atonement for her. Then she will be cleansed from the discharge of her blood. This is the Torah for her who gives birth, whether to a male or a female child. Lev 12:8 If she cannot afford a lamb, then she is to bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons, one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering.
    [Show full text]