DOCSLIB.ORG

Civil and Guideway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Civil and Guideway Trillium Line Extension Project Agreement – Schedule 15-2, Part 2 Ottawa Stage 2 LRT Project Execution Version Table of Contents PART 2 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS – CIVIL AND GUIDEWAY .................................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 General ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 General Description of the Guideway and Guideway Requirements ......................... 2 1.3 Access of Emergency Services Vehicles to the Guideway ......................................... 6 ARTICLE 2 GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TRACK ALIGNMENT .............. 7 2.1 Reference Documents ................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Use of Minimum or Maximum Criterion .................................................................... 7 2.3 General ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Horizontal Alignment ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Track Centres .............................................................................................................. 9 2.6 Horizontal Curves ....................................................................................................... 9 2.7 Spirals ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.8 Superelevation ........................................................................................................... 10 2.9 Vertical Alignment .................................................................................................... 11 2.10 Special Trackwork .................................................................................................... 13 2.11 Other Alignment Requirements ................................................................................ 14 2.12 Clearances ................................................................................................................. 14 ARTICLE 3 TRACKWORK ............................................................................................ 16 3.1 Reference Documents ............................................................................................... 16 3.2 Scope of Work .......................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Track Classification .................................................................................................. 17 3.4 General Requirements ............................................................................................... 17 3.5 Track Structure Types ............................................................................................... 19 3.6 Rail Configurations ................................................................................................... 20 3.7 Track Materials ......................................................................................................... 22 3.8 Special Trackwork .................................................................................................... 26 3.9 Track Commissioning Tests ..................................................................................... 29 3.10 Track Measurement and Assessment Standards ....................................................... 29 3.11 Track Measurement and Assessment Methodology ................................................. 30 ARTICLE 4 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA AND REQUIREMENTS ............... 31 4.1 Scope ......................................................................................................................... 31 4.2 Reference Documents ............................................................................................... 31 4.3 General Requirements ............................................................................................... 32 4.4 Design Requirements ................................................................................................ 33 4.5 Loads and Forces ...................................................................................................... 40 4.6 Material ..................................................................................................................... 42 4.7 Construction .............................................................................................................. 45 4.8 Description of Project Structures .............................................................................. 46 ARTICLE 5 DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN CRITERIA .................................................................................................... 69 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Page i Trillium Line Extension Project Agreement – Schedule 15-2, Part 2 Ottawa Stage 2 LRT Project Execution Version 5.1 Reference Documents ............................................................................................... 69 5.2 General Criteria ......................................................................................................... 70 5.3 Drainage Criteria ....................................................................................................... 72 5.4 Stormwater Management Criteria ............................................................................. 74 5.5 Numerical Computational Procedures and Models .................................................. 76 5.6 Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements ........................................................... 76 5.7 Site-Specific Criteria ................................................................................................. 77 ARTICLE 6 ROADWAYS, BUS TERMINALS, AND LAY-BYS ................................ 86 6.1 Reference Documents ............................................................................................... 86 6.2 General Requirements ............................................................................................... 88 6.3 Horizontal Alignment ............................................................................................... 91 6.4 Vertical Alignment .................................................................................................... 92 6.5 Sight Distance Requirements .................................................................................... 92 6.6 Access and Intersection Layout ................................................................................ 93 6.7 Cross-Section Elements ............................................................................................ 93 6.8 Design Vehicles ........................................................................................................ 94 6.9 Facilities Operated by OC Transpo ........................................................................... 95 6.10 Pavement ................................................................................................................... 99 6.11 Grading ................................................................................................................... 104 6.12 Drainage .................................................................................................................. 106 6.13 Traffic and Transit Signals ...................................................................................... 106 6.14 Pavement Marking and Signing .............................................................................. 111 6.15 Street Lighting ........................................................................................................ 113 6.16 Passenger Pick-Up and Drop Off Facilities ............................................................ 114 6.17 Road Safety Audits and Road Safety Design Reviews ........................................... 115 6.18 Municipal Roads Improvements ............................................................................. 125 ARTICLE 7 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN CRITERIA AND REQUIREMENTS ......... 146 7.1 Reference Documents ............................................................................................. 146 7.2 General Requirements ............................................................................................. 147 7.3 Foundations ............................................................................................................. 148 7.4 Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes ................................................................................ 148 7.5 Permanent Retaining Structures and Cut & Cover Structures ................................ 149 7.6 Services ................................................................................................................... 150 7.7 Temporary Slopes and Retaining Structures ........................................................... 150 7.8 Earthwork and Geo Environmental......................................................................... 151 7.9 Geotechnical Instrumentation ................................................................................. 151 7.10 Monitoring Requirements ....................................................................................... 155 7.11 Groundwater Control
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And
    Appendix 5 Station Descriptions and Technical Overview Stage 2 light rail transit (LRT) stations will follow the same standards, design principles, and connectivity and mobility requirements as Stage 1 Confederation Line. Proponent Teams were instructed, through the guidelines outlined in the Project Agreement (PA), to design stations that will integrate with Stage 1, which include customer facilities, accessibility features, and the ability to support the City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) goals for public transit and ridership growth. The station features planned for the Stage 2 LRT Project will be designed and built on these performance standards which include: Barrier-free path of travel to entrances of stations; Accessible fare gates at each entrance, providing easy access for customers using mobility devices or service animals; Tactile wayfinding tiles will trace the accessible route through the fare gates, to elevators, platforms and exits; Transecure waiting areas on the train platform will include accessible benches and tactile/Braille signs indicating the direction of service; Tactile warning strips and inter-car barriers to keep everyone safely away from the platform edge; Audio announcements and visual displays for waiting passengers will precede each train’s arrival on the platform and will describe the direction of travel; Service alerts will be shown visually on the passenger information display monitors and announced audibly on the public-address system; All wayfinding and safety signage will be provided following the applicable accessibility standards (including type size, tactile signage, and appropriate colour contrast); Clear, open sight lines and pedestrian design that make wayfinding simple and intuitive; and, Cycling facilities at all stations including shelter for 80 per cent of the provided spaces, with additional space protected to ensure cycling facilities can be doubled and integrated into the station’s footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2020 Final
    CITY COUNCILLOR / CONSEILLER MUNICIPAL RILEY BROCKINGTON River Ward Ward / Quartier/ Quartier Rivière Rivière 613--580580-2486-2486 ● [email protected]● [email protected] @RiverWardRiley October 2020 Website: RileyBrockington.ca Proudly serving all residents of River Ward Dear Neighbours and Residents, I anticipate reopening the Ward Office in I trust you are well, had a restful summer the Hunt Club - Riverside Park Community and continue to enjoy autumn. As the Centre once the centre fully reopens to cooler weather arrives we will soon be the public. Currently only those registered spending more time indoors. for classes or a fitness session may enter the building. However, if you wish to meet Don’t forget that River Ward has some of with me face-to-face, please call my office the City’s best wooded walking trails, a and we can make the necessary 5km groomed cross country ski trail at the arrangements. Terry Fox Athletic Centre and Mooney’s Bay Park, spectacular toboggan hills, the I have used my time during the pandemic Carleton Heights Curling rink, dozens of to successfully champion a number of outdoor community-run ice rinks, the JA battles including allowing community Dulude Arena and Deborah Anne Kirwan gardens to open during the shutdown, staggered reopening of library services, indoor pool. Enjoy the bounty that our Supporting River’s Ward small businesses will be the key to our recovery. Premier ward has to offer. With the on-going offering summer camp programs, advanced the re-opening of the City’s Cleaners on Merivale Road in Carlington is a family-run business that has felt the COVID pandemic, it is important to ensure brunt of COVID-19 like so many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation
    INTERRENT REIT INVESTOR PRESENTATION March 2018 INTERRENT REIT IS A GROWTH- ORIENTED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST ENGAGED IN INCREASING VALUE AND CREATING A GROWING AND SUSTAINABLE DISTRIBUTION THROUGH THE ACQUISITION AND OWNERSHIP OF MULTI-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “anticipated”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. InterRent is subject to significant risks and uncertainties which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward looking statements contained in this release. A full description of these risk factors can be found in InterRent’s publicly filed information which may be located at www.sedar.com. InterRent cannot assure investors that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements and InterRent assumes no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation to reflect actual events or new circumstances. 157 Pearl | Hamilton InterRent REIT | 2018 3 ABOUT INTERRENT ROADMAP TO THE PRESENT 12¢ 12¢ 13.65¢ 18.68¢ 20.36¢ 22.15¢ 23.30¢ 24.75¢ Start September 30, 2009 End As at March 22, 2018 Unit Price $1.50 to $10.09 Cumulative Distributions $1.51 Total Return 701% Number of 4,033 to 120% Suites 8,880 Since current management took over, InterRent has been one of the best performing REITs in Canada with a total return of 701%.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives
    APPENDIX I DETAILED EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Alternatives Analysis – Gladstone Station Trillium Line Extension EA Study Performance Measures – “The preferred Factor Areas / Criteria Option 1: North of Gladstone Option 2: Centred on Gladstone Option 3: South of Gladstone alternative…” Transportation System Network connectivity Provides the best connections to existing and GOOD VERY GOOD POOR planned local and rapid transit routes Provides a direct connection to the planned Provides a direct connection to the planned Does not provide a direct connection to the transit plaza. transit plaza. planned transit plaza Passengers transferring to/from eastbound Provides a direct connection to both sides of Passengers transferring to/from westbound bus route 14 must cross Gladstone Avenue. Gladstone Avenue, so that passengers bus route 14 must cross Gladstone Avenue. transferring to/from bus route 14 need not cross the street. Provides the best connections to existing and GOOD VERY GOOD POOR planned pedestrian, cycling and road networks Provides direct connection to pedestrian Provides direct connection to pedestrian Provides direct connection to pedestrian networks accessible from transit plaza. networks accessible from transit plaza and networks accessible from south side of Provides direct connection to N-S MUP and E- south side of Gladstone. Gladstone, but not those accessible from W Gladstone Avenue cycling route. Provides direct connection to N-S MUP and E- transit plaza. W Gladstone Avenue cycling route. Provides direct connection to N-S MUP and E- W Gladstone Avenue cycling route. Ridership Generates the highest ridership VERY GOOD Combined total of 180 boardings and alightings anticipated during the 2048 morning peak hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Line 1 Preparations Continue
    Transpo Express FALL 2017_Layout 1 2017-Oct-20 10:42 AM Page 1 TRANSPO express WINTERFall 2017 2019 Line 1 preparations continue 2. Derek Stevens 3. Tony Spinello GARAGE ATTENDANT 1. Tim Wielinga PARA TRANSPO 1. 7150 Brian Ferguson 2. 7313 Hussein Suleiman reparations have been underway for some requirements that come with the transition to that have been created and how they will con- time for the highly anticipated launch a multi-modal transit system, made up of bus, tribute to the success of our new light rail line. PCONVENTIONALof O-Train Line 1. Many positions have diesel rail and light rail. Continue reading on been created and filled to meet the changing page 4 for an in-depth look at some of the roles 1. 2883 Manjit Nagra 2. 5833 Kulwinder Sidhu he 2017 Roadeo competition and weather competition this year. Manjit will compete in the In this issue was HOT! Competitors, spectators, staff and 2018 International Roadeo in Tampa, Florida. He 3. 2643 Terry Claesson Tvolunteers came out on a beautiful will be joined by William Castillo, Derek Stevens September Sunday for this year’s annual Roadeo. and Tony Spinello, who will compete in the Mechanical competition. Another successful OperatorPriority Manjit Seating Nagra, who Cards was runner-up in6 past years, won first place in the Conventional Transit Food Drive! 2 2017 ROADEO cont’d P. 4-5 Transecure stories 7 InThe charter this experience issue 2 Accessible entrances NewTraining Nova - onebuses track at at andNew parking Employee at OC Passes Transpo 7 4 OC Celebrates Ottawa cominga
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSIT SERVICES Document 1 PURCHASE ORDERS ≥$10,000 AWARDED UNDER DELEGATION of AUTHORITY for the PERIOD JULY 1, 2012 to DECEMBER 31, 2012
    TRANSIT SERVICES Document 1 PURCHASE ORDERS ≥$10,000 AWARDED UNDER DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2012 TO DECEMBER 31, 2012 Professional / Vendor Name Item PO Branch Description Consulting Contract Type Amount Non-Competitive Rationale Location Services 1 45064135 BOS Printing and delivery of "Take-One" pamphlets as distributed aboard OC Transpo A $20,352.00 LOWE MARTIN COMPANY INC buses for 2012. OTTAWA ON 2 45067917 BOS Provision of web site hosting services for www.octranspo.com for 2012. E $10,349.00 STORM INTERNET SERVICES Section 22(1)(c) OTTAWA ON Only one source of supply acceptable and cost effective 3 45072521 BOS Transit map printing services for OC Transpo. E $13,028.66 MPH GRAPHICS INC MARKHAM ON 4 45072550 BOS Supply and delivery of fifteen hundred and fifty (1,550) Transit Shelter maps for $17,334.21 LOWE MARTIN COMPANY INC OC Transpo. OTTAWA ON 5 45072971 BOS Professional project management services to undertake and support the re- PO $23,201.28 CORPORATE RESEARCH GROUP scoping of the Presto card rollout and launch in 2013 for the Transit Services NEPEAN ON department. 6 45073040 BOS Professional services (voice artist) for Next Stop Announcement System voice PE $15,265.02 THE MENSOUR AGENCY LTD Section 22(1)(c) prompts on as and when required basis for an estimated one (1) year period. OTTAWA ON Only one source of supply acceptable and cost effective 7 45073208 BOS Professional services to undertake database and design revisions to the OC PO $13,432.32 BV02 INC Transpo Events web page.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2020 Update
    September 2020 Update Transportation Services Department FEDCo September 1, 20201 2 O-Train South Design Progress • The following submissions have been Issued-For- Construction: – Structures throughout the alignment including Rail Bridges at Airport Parkway, Uplands, Leitrim, Bowesville, Earl Armstrong and Lester; and, – Utility Relocations throughout the alignment. 3 O-Train South Design Progress • The City has received construction drawings of the following project elements: – Airport Station; – Guideway for the Airport Link; and, – Structures throughout the alignment including High Road MUP Bridge, Limebank Road Elevated Guideway, Airport Elevated Guideway, VIA Grade Separation, Rideau River Pedestrian Bridge. 4 O-Train South Design Progress • The City has received final design drawings of the following project elements: – Guideway for the South Extension to Limebank; – Guideway for the existing portion of the line; – Landscape design for the existing line and Airport Link; – Dow’s Lake Tunnel, including Tunnel Ventilation; and – Vehicle elements, including the driver’s cab, interior layout and HVAC System. 5 O-Train South Design Progress • The City has received pre-final design drawings of the following project elements: – Walkley Yard Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF); – Operational Modelling for the Overall System and the MSF; – Signaling and Train Control System; – Greenboro, Carleton, Mooney’s Bay, Gladstone and Walkley Stations; and, – Communication Systems designs for Greenboro and Carleton Stations and interface control documents for several subsystems on the project. 6 O-Train South Construction Progress • Rock excavation started on Gladstone Station; • Walkley Maintenance and Storage Facility structure construction has commenced; • Work has commenced at Ellwood Diamond grade separation. Caisson construction is underway; • Work has begun on Carleton south MUP; and, • Commenced work at South Keys and Bowesville Stations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-1101-Ottawa-Central-ETT-4.Pdf
    OUR MISSION To be our customers’ preferred supplier of transportation logistics services to help them meet the needs of their own customers. BASIS OF OUR MISSION To make a significant contribution to our customers’ commercial success by providing safe, efficient and cost- effective transportation logistics services. OTTAWA CENTRAL RAILWAY TIME TABLE NO. 4 Effective Monday November 1st, 2004 REFER TO PAGE 2 FOR EFFECTIVE TIME AND FOR OTHER TIME AND DATE CHANGES THAT WILL OCCUR JAMES ALLEN GENERAL MANAGER OTTAWA ONT LUC LAROSE TRANSPORTATION SUPERVISOR OTTAWA ONT. TIME TABLE NO 4 OTTAWA CENTRAL RAILWAY Page 2 November 1st 2004 MAJOR CHANGES TO TIME TABLE NO 4 Information previously contained in the monthly- re-issue of bulletins has been placed in the subdivisions to which it applies. System Special Instructions containing Rule changes and Special Instructions have been revised. General Operating Instructions have been revised Rule 105(a) is applicable on all non-main tracks except tracks at Smurfit Stone. Beachburg Sub RTC Standby Channel has Changed. Main track ends at mile 85.0 Speeds on the North and South Freight shed leads and the Sheffeild Industrial have changed Renfrew Sub RTC Standby Channel has Changed Vankleek Sub RTC Standby Channel, tones and DTMF Codes have Changed L'Orignal Sub RTC Standby Channel, tones and DTMF Codes have Changed TIME TABLE NO 4 OTTAWA CENTRAL RAILWAY Page 3 November 1st 2004 EFFECTIVE 0001 Monday November 1st, 2004 on Beachburg, Renfrew ,Vankleek and L'Orignal Subdivisions Governed by: Eastern Standard Time Commencing at 0100 Sunday, October 31st, 2004 Eastern Daylight Saving Time Commencing at 0300 Sunday April 3rd, 2005 Eastern Standard Time Commencing at 0100 Sunday, October 30th, 2005 THIS TIME TABLE IS FOR THE INFORMATION AND GUIDANCE OF OCR EMPLOYEES AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO USE IT.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports and Council / et au Conseil November 7, 2013 7 novembre 2013 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Vivi Chi, Manager/Gestionnaire, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 21877, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2013-PAI-PGM-0230 SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN, OTTAWA PEDESTRIAN PLAN AND OTTAWA CYCLING PLAN UPDATE – ADDENDUM REPORT OBJET : PLAN DIRECTEUR DES TRANSPORTS, PLAN DE LA CIRCULATION PIÉTONNIÈRE D’OTTAWA ET PLAN SUR LE CYCLISME D’OTTAWA – ADDENDA REPORT RECOMMENDATION That Transportation Committee recommend Council approve the recommended changes identified in this report (Table 1) to the draft Transportation Master Plan, Ottawa Pedestrian Plan and Ottawa Cycling Plan that was tabled on October 9, 2013 at the Joint Transportation Committee and Transit Commission meeting. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil d’approuver les modifications recommandées et précisées dans le présent rapport (tableau 1) pour la version provisoire du Plan directeur des transports, le Plan de la circulation piétonnière d’Ottawa et le Plan sur le cyclisme d’Ottawa qui ont été déposé le 9 octobre 2013 lors de la réunion conjointe du Comité des transports et de la Commission du transport en commun. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Assumptions and Analysis This is an addendum to the October 9, 2013 joint Transportation Committee and Transit Commission staff report (ACS2013-PAI-PGM-0193) to summarize the consultation feedback and proposed changes following the tabling and public release of the draft 2013 Transportation Master Plan (TMP), Ottawa Pedestrian Plan (OPP) and Ottawa Cycling Plan (OCP).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Consultation Record
    APPENDIX A CONSULTATION RECORD MEETING REPORT Date: July 14, 2014 Project: O-Train Extension EA Date of meeting: June 26, 2014 Project Number: 3414015-000 Location: Honeywell Room, Author: E. Sangster Ottawa City Hall Purpose: Transit Design and Operations Workshop Attendees: Initial E-Mail Steven Boyle, City of Ottawa SB [email protected] Alex Carr, City of Ottawa AC [email protected] Vivi Chi, City of Ottawa VC [email protected] Dennis Gratton, City of Ottawa DG [email protected] Frank McKinney, City of Ottawa FM [email protected] Kornel Mucsi, City of Ottawa KM [email protected] Pat Scrimgeour, City of Ottawa PSC [email protected] Colin Simpson, City of Ottawa CS [email protected] Derek Washnuk, City of Ottawa DW [email protected] Yvon Larochelle, OMCIAA YL [email protected] Alex Stecky-Efantis, OMCIAA AS [email protected] Paul Croft, Parsons Corporation PC [email protected] David Hopper, Parsons Corporation DH [email protected] Scott Bowers, MMM Group SB [email protected] Tim Dickinson, MMM Group TD [email protected] Paul Nimigon, MMM Group PN [email protected] Emily Sangster, MMM Group ES [email protected] Peter Steacy, MMM Group PST [email protected] DISTRIBUTION: All Attendees Item Details Action By 1. Introductions CS and PST provided an introduction to the study team, objectives, process and rationale. 2. Operational Considerations DH provided an overview of the existing OC Transpo network, which the O-Train extension will support. Transit network planning principles to be considered as part of this study include coverage, capacity, reliability, and legibility.
    [Show full text]
  • A Long-Term Vision CONFEDERATION HEIGHTS 1950-2050
    A Long-Term Vision CONFEDERATION HEIGHTS 1950-2050 A Long Term Vision for Confederation Heights Presented by: John Caldwell | Nicolas Church | Jessica D’Aoust | Brad Holmes | Joseph Lefaive | NoorAli Meghani Graeme Muir | Yi Qin | Michael Shmulevitch | René Tardif | Barrett Wagar SURP 824 Project Course December 2015 School of Urban and Regional Planning Department of Geography and Planning Queen’s University SCHOOL OF Urban and Regional Planning In partnership with: Public Services and Services Publics et Procurement Canada Approvisionnement Canada The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Public Service and Procurement Canda or of the National Capital Commission. The contents reflect solely the advice and views of the Queen’s University School of Urban and Regional Planning authors as part of the SURP 824 Project Course. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A LONG-TERM VISION FOR CONFEDERATION HEIGHTS Produced by: the School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen’s University OBJECTIVE FROM 1950 TO 2050 Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) and the National In the 1950s, Jacques Gréber created the Plan for the National Capital Commission (NCC) requested the creation of a strategic Capital, which intended to decentralize federal employment in the long-term vision for Confederation Heights, an existing federal National Capital Region The plan resulted in the establishment of office node located in Ottawa, Ontario. The Project Team has been a single-use federal office node at Confederation Heights, which retained to develop a 35-year, long-term plan that will help guide was auto-centric and characterized by sprawling parking lots the future redevelopment of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Detailed Case Studies
    Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX E DETAILED CASE STUDIES Revised Final Report 2011 Page E-1 Detailed Case Studies Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations TABLE OF CONTENTS Case Study Summary ............................................................................................................................... E-3 Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) .............................................................................................................. E-7 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) ........................................... E-21 Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) ................................................................ E-33 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) ..................................................................... E-41 Metro-North Railroad ............................................................................................................................. E-57 New Jersey Transit (NJT) ....................................................................................................................... E-67 OC Transpo .............................................................................................................................................. E-81 Regional Transit District Denver (RTD) ............................................................................................... E-93 Sound Transit ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]