DOCSLIB.ORG

A Case Study Ground Motion Monitoring in Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Case Study Ground Motion Monitoring in Norway European Association of Remote Sensing Companies Sentinels Benefits Study (SeBS) A Case Study Ground Motion Monitoring in Norway SeBS-CR-008 Page 1 July 2020 Client: ESA Client Representative: Alessandra Tassa Date of Delivery: July 2020 Version: Draft Author(s): Geoff Sawyer (EARSC) Dáire Boyle (EARSC) Supported by Nikolay Khabarov (IIASA) Reviewed by Alessandra Tassa (ESA) Version Date Comment 1st Issue April 2020 Final July 2020 For more information contact: • EARSC: [email protected] • ESA: [email protected] Funded by the EU and ESA – ESA Contract Number: 4000119743/17/I-SBo. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Space Agency or the European Union. SeBS-CR-008 Page 2 July 2020 Table of Contents Setting the Scene ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction & Scope ........................................................................................................................ 10 1.1 The Context of this study ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 What is the Case all about? ................................................................................................................. 10 1.3 How does this case relate to others? .................................................................................................. 11 1.4 More About the Study ......................................................................................................................... 11 1.5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 12 2 The Road Network in Norway ........................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Development of the road network ...................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Geological considerations ................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 An integrated transport network ........................................................................................................ 18 2.4 Where Ground Motion becomes Important ....................................................................................... 21 2.4.1 Challenges faced ................................................................................................................................................... 21 2.4.2 Building a Bridge at Sifjord .................................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.3 The Frodeåsen tunnel in Tønsberg ....................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.4 Bjørvika ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 2.5 Social and Environmental Considerations ........................................................................................... 27 2.6 Data for Informed Decision Making .................................................................................................... 28 2.6.1 What decisions? .................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.6.2 What Data? ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.6.3 Limitations of Conventional Methords ................................................................................................................. 29 3 The Use of Sentinel Data ................................................................................................................... 30 3.1 How can Satellites help with Roads Management? ............................................................................ 30 3.2 Copernicus and the Sentinels .............................................................................................................. 30 3.3 How can satellites measure ground motion? ...................................................................................... 32 3.4 The Norwegian Ground Motion Service – InSAR Norway ................................................................... 37 3.5 Evolution of the service ....................................................................................................................... 41 3.6 The Norwegian Avalanche Warning Service ........................................................................................ 42 4 Understanding the Value Chains ....................................................................................................... 44 4.1 Description of the Value-Chains .......................................................................................................... 44 4.2 Actors in the primary value chain ........................................................................................................ 45 4.2.1 Tier 1: Service Provider – NGU and partners ........................................................................................................ 45 4.2.2 Tier 2: Primary User – Statens vegvesen (NPRA) .................................................................................................. 46 4.2.3 Tier 3: Construction and related industries .......................................................................................................... 47 4.2.4 Tier 4: Road users, citizens, and society................................................................................................................ 50 4.3 Actors in the secondary value chain .................................................................................................... 51 4.3.1 Tier 1: Service Provider – NGU and partners ........................................................................................................ 51 4.3.2 Tier 2: Primary User – NGU ................................................................................................................................... 51 4.3.3 Tier 3: NVE ............................................................................................................................................................ 51 4.3.4 Tier 4: Citizens & society ....................................................................................................................................... 52 4.4 Additional applications – The Norwegian Avalanche Warning Service ............................................... 52 5 Assessing the Benefits ....................................................................................................................... 53 SeBS-CR-008 Page 3 July 2020 5.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 53 5.2 The Primary Value-Chain ..................................................................................................................... 54 5.2.1 Tier 1: Service Provider – NGU and partners ........................................................................................................ 54 5.2.2 Tier 2: Primary User – NPRA ................................................................................................................................. 55 5.2.3 Tier 3: Construction and related industries .......................................................................................................... 63 5.2.4 Tier 4: Citizens & Society ....................................................................................................................................... 65 5.3 The Secondary Value-Chain ................................................................................................................. 68 5.3.1 Tier 1: NGU and partners ...................................................................................................................................... 68 5.3.2 Tier 2: NGU ........................................................................................................................................................... 68 5.3.3 Tier 3: NVE ............................................................................................................................................................ 69 5.3.4 Tier 4: Citizens and Society ................................................................................................................................... 69 5.4 Additional applications – The Norwegian Avalanche Warning Service ............................................... 69 5.5 Summary of Benefits ........................................................................................................................... 70 5.5.1 Economic Benefits ................................................................................................................................................ 70 5.5.2 Environmental......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report Race to Electrification – Norway in Pole Position Booklet.Pdf
    Urban Insight is an initiative launched by Sweco The theme for 2019 is Urban Energy, describing In our insight reports, written by Sweco’s 2019 to illustrate our expertise – encompassing both various facets of sustainable urban develop- experts, we explore how citizens view and local knowledge and global capacity – as the ment as regards energy usage, renewable use urban areas and how local circumstances URBAN ENERGY leading adviser to the urban areas of Europe. energy and energy efficiency – with future can be improved to create more liveable, This initiative offers unique insights into challenges and opportunities in the new sustainable cities and communities. REPORT sustainable urban development in Europe, energy landscape. from the citizens’ perspective. Please visit our website to learn more: RACE TO ELECTRIFICATION swecourbaninsight.com – NORWAY IN POLE POSITION SWECOURBANINSIGHT.COM URBAN INSIGHT 2019 URBAN INSIGHT 2019 URBAN ENERGY URBAN ENERGY RACE TO ELECTRIFICATION RACE TO ELECTRIFICATION – NORWAY IN – NORWAY IN POLE POSITION POLE POSITION RACE TO ELECTRIFICATION – NORWAY IN POLE POSITION EIRIK HORDNES iii 1 URBAN INSIGHT 2019 URBAN INSIGHT 2019 URBAN ENERGY URBAN ENERGY RACE TO ELECTRIFICATION RACE TO ELECTRIFICATION – NORWAY IN – NORWAY IN POLE POSITION POLE POSITION IMAGINE AN ELECTRIFIED FUTURE. CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 DEFINING ELECTRIFICATION 6 NOISE AND POLLUTION ARE GONE. 3 WHY AND WHAT DO WE NEED TO ELECTRIFY? 10 4 CASE STUDY: MEET THE ELECTRON 18 THE AIR YOU BREATHE IS CLEAN. 5 CAN TRANSPORT IN NORWAY BECOME FULLY ELECTRICAL? 24 HEALTH-RELATED SOCIETAL 6 INDUSTRY – A “HARD-TO-ABATE” SECTOR 36 7 THE BUILDINGS SECTOR – NORWAY AS AN OUTLIER 42 COSTS ARE REDUCED – FREEING 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 46 UP RESOURCES FOR OTHER 9 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 52 10 REFERENCES 54 INVESTMENTS THAT WILL BRING MEANING AND JOY TO PEOPLE’S LIVES IN THE CITY.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Saving in Transport of Goods – a Pilot Project in Rural Natural Resource Based Industries
    Rapport 4/2001 Energy saving in transport of goods – a pilot project in rural natural resource based industries Final report from the European Commission SAVE -project XVII/4.1031/Z/97-229 By Otto Andersen1, Kyrre Groven1, Eivind Brendehaug1, Outi Uusitalo2, Ulla Suutari2, Jarkko Lehtinen2, Peter Ahlvik3 and Hans Hjortsberg3 1Western Norway Research Institute 2VTT - Finland 3Ecotraffic R&D AB - Sweden WNRI Report Title: Report number: Energy saving in transport of goods – a pilot project in rural 4/2001 natural resource based industries. Date: February 2001 Grading: Open Project title: Number of pages Energy saving in transport of goods – a pilot project in rural natural resource based industries. Researchers: Otto Andersen, Kyrre Groven, Eivind Project responsible: Brendehaug, Outi Uusitalo, Ulla Suutari, Jarkko Lehtinen, Karl G. Høyer Peter Ahlvik and Hans Hjortsberg Financed by: Subject heading European Commission DG XVII energy saving, goods transport, measures and actions, rural resource based industries Summary This report presents the results from a project on energy saving in transport of goods. It has been a pilot project in rural natural resource based industries in three Nordic countries. The main object of the project has been to develop and implement actions, strategies and measures for improved energy efficiency in transport of goods. The project has used 3 cases of natural resource based industries, one from each of the three Nordic countries Norway, Sweden and Finland. The cases are fish export in Norway, wood (paper) export in Finland and agricultural products (mainly grain) in Sweden. Pilot actions have been carried out in one company each in Norway and Finland and in two companies in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Jernbanestatistikk 2004
    Jernbanestatistikk 2004 1 Innhold Contents Forord 3 Preface 3 Sammenstillig av nøkkeltall 2004 4 Summary of key figures 2004 4 Det nordiske jernbanenettet 5 The Nordic railway network 5 Nøkkeltall infrastruktur i de nordiske land 5 Nordic railways – key figures 5 Baneprioriteter 6 Line priority 6 Nøkkeltall for det statlige jernbanenettet 7 Key figures for Norway’s public rail network 7 Trafikk 8 Traffic 8 Togmengde/togtetthet (person- og godstog) 8 Train density (passenger and freight traffic) 8 Totalt antall tog pr. døgn i Oslo-området 9 Total number of trains per day in Greater Oslo area 9 Persontrafikk 10 Passenger traffic 10 Antall reiser med tog (1000) 10 Passenger journeys (1000) 10 Antall personkilometer (mill.) 11 Passenger-kilometres (million) 11 Totalt antall persontog pr. døgn i Oslo-området 11 Total number of passenger trains per day in Reisetid og reiseavstander mellom større byer 12 Greater Oslo area 11 Avstandstabell langs jernbane (km) 12 Journey time and travelling distance between major cities 12 Raskeste tog på strekningen (tt:mm) 12 Distance by rail (km) 12 Reisehastighet for raskeste tog på strekningen, Fastest train on route (hh:mm) 12 avstand regnet langs vei (km/h) 13 Average speed of fastest train on each route Utvikling i reisetid for persontog 1960 - 2004 13 based on road distance (km/h) 13 Godstrafikk 14 Passenger train journey times, 1960–2004 13 Antall tonn transportert med tog (1000) 14 Freight traffic 14 Antall tonnkilometer (mill.) 15 Tonnes transported by rail (1000) 14 Punktlighet i toggangen 16 Tonne-kilometres (million) 15 Punktlighet i toggangen 2004 16 Train punctuality 16 Utvikling i punktlighet 1993 - 2004 18 Train punctuality 2004 16 Uønskede hendelser 19 Punctuality trends 1993–2004 18 Driftsulykker 19 Incidents 19 Sammenstilling av ulykker 2004 19 Accident 19 Driftsulykker ved togframføring 1993 - 2004 19 Accidents in 2004 19 Dyrepåkjørsler 20 Train-related accidents 1993–2004 19 Dyrepåkjørsler 1997-2004 20 Animal fatalities 20 Dyrepåkjørsler etter art i 2004 20 Animal fatalities 1997-2004 20 Antall elgpåkjørsler pr.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Baltic Task 5.5 the Market for Intermodal Transport in the Trans Baltic Port-Hinterland Corridor to the Ferry Link Gdynia – Karlskrona”
    ody Rapport 2010:X Trans Baltic task 5.5 The market for intermodal transport in the Trans Baltic Port-Hinterland Corridor to the ferry link Gdynia – Karlskrona Fredrik Bärthel Edith Sorkina Michael Malmquist Trans Baltic task 5.5 The market for intermodal transport in the Port- Hinterland Corridor to the ferry link Gdynia – Karlskrona PREFACE During the spring 2012 Vectura has accomplished the study ”Trans Baltic task 5.5 The market for intermodal transport in the Trans Baltic Port-Hinterland Corridor to the ferry link Gdynia – Karlskrona”. The study has been accomplished in close co-operation with the client Region Blekinge and the shipping line Stena Line. This report is the final reporting of the project and includes description and analysis of the market conditions as a basis the establishment of an intermodal hinterland connection to/from the Port of Karlskrona The work has been accomplished by the following researchers; Lina Wells, Vectura Consulting (Project Leader until March 1st, 2012) Fredrik Bärthel, Vectura Consulting (Project Leader from March 1st, 2012) Edith Sorkina, Vectura Consulting Michael Malmquist, Vectura Consulting Marcin Wolek, Protrans (subconsultant) This report has been written by Fredrik Bärthel and Edith Sorkina, Vectura Consulting, who also are responsible for the content of the report. A steering group has been appointed to work in close co-operation with the researchers. Vectura want to address a thank you to the study's funders, the person listed above as well as others who favorably, for example, to be interviewed, contributed to this study could be conducted in a positive spirit, and that interesting results and valuable information emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian High Speed Rail Assessment 2010-2012
    Norwegian High Speed Rail Assessment 2010-2012 Summary of Phase 2 Works Jernbaneverket 26 May 2011 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared by Atkins Transport planning and Management and are intended solely for Jernbaneverket‘s information and use in relation to the Norwegian HSR Assessment Project. Atkins Transport Planning and Management assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Document History Job number: 5101627 Document ref: NHS Ph2 Summary Report_v2.0_issued 260511.docx Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 First Draft JT TH JT WL 11/05/11 Rev 2.0 Final report incorporating JT TH JT WL 26/05/11 Client comments Client signoff Client Jernbaneverket Project Norwegian High Speed Rail Assessment Document title Summary of Phase 2 Works Job No. 5101627 Copy No. 1 Document reference Jon Tindall Address: 3100 Century Way Thorpe Park Leeds LS15 8ZB UK Email: [email protected] Telephone: +44 113 306 6010 Table of contents Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 6 1.1. This Document 6 1.2. The Study 6 1.3. Concepts to be Assessed 7 1.4. The Material 7 1.5. Structure of the Document 9 2. Market Analysis 10 2.1. Introduction 10 2.2. Subject 1: Demand Potential for HSR Services in Norway 10 2.3. Subject 2: Analysis of Expected Amount of Ticket Revenues 17 2.4. Subject 3: Passenger Choice – Preferences for Travel & Means of Transport 23 2.5. Subject 4: Location & Services of Stations/Terminals 27 2.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapportens Tittel Skrives
    International Research Institute of Stavanger AS www.iris.no Contents SUMMARY................................................................................................................................ 4 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 7 2 THE TRANSPORT SITUATION IN NORWAY................................................................ 9 2.1 Goods transport on railroad......................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 The transport services .................................................................................. 10 2.1.2 The recent history of Norwegian rail transport ............................................ 11 3 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GENERAL GOODS TRANSPORTATION MARKET....................................................................................... 13 3.1 Implications for rail transport.................................................................................... 13 3.2 The Norwegian case.................................................................................................. 14 4 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GOODS TRANSPORT MARKET ON RAIL................................................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Combined transport................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Wagonload and system cargo...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JFQ 11 ▼JFQ FORUM Become Customer-Oriented Purveyors of Narrow NOTES Capabilities Rather Than Combat-Oriented Or- 1 Ganizations with a Broad Focus and an Under- U.S
    Warfare today is a thing of swift movement—of rapid concentrations. It requires the building up of enormous fire power against successive objectives with breathtaking speed. It is not a game for the unimaginative plodder. ...the truly great leader overcomes all difficulties, and campaigns and battles are nothing but a long series of difficulties to be overcome. — General George C. Marshall Fort Benning, Georgia September 18, 1941 Inaugural Issue JFQ CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by Colin L. Powell Introducing the Inaugural Issue 6 by the Editor-in-Chief JFQ FORUM JFQ Inaugural Issue The Services and Joint Warfare: 7 Four Views from the Top Projecting Strategic Land Combat Power 8 by Gordon R. Sullivan The Wave of the Future 13 by Frank B. Kelso II Complementary Capabilities from the Sea 17 by Carl E. Mundy, Jr. Ideas Count by Merrill A. McPeak JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY 22 JFQ Reforming Joint Doctrine Coalition Warfare What’s Ahead for the Armed Forces? by David E. Jeremiah Joint Warfare— Views from the Top 25 United Nations Peacekeeping The Limits of Jointness The Gulf War Service Redundancy: Waste or Hidden Capability? Revisited Joint Air Summer Operations 93 by Stephen Peter Rosen Inaugural Issue 36 Service Redundancy— Waste or Capability? A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL ABOUT THE COVER Reforming Joint Doctrine The cover shows USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, 40 by Robert A. Doughty passing through the Suez Canal during Opera- tion Desert Shield, a U.S. Navy photo by Frank A. Marquart. Photo credits for insets, from top United Nations Peacekeeping: Ends versus Means to bottom, are Schulzinger and Lombard (for 48 by William H.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Operator Fatigue in Norway: Literature Review and Expert Opinion
    TØI report 1395/2015 Ross Owen Phillips Tor-Olav Nævestad Torkel Bjørnskau Transport operator fatigue in Norway: literature review and expert opinion Fatigue in Transport Report III TØI Report 1395/2015 Transport operator fatigue in Norway: literature and expert opinion Fatigue in Transport Report III This report is covered by the terms and conditions specified by the Norwegian Copyright Act. Contents of the report may be used for referencing or as a source of information. Quotations or references must be attributed to the Institute of Transport Economics (TØI) as the source with specific mention made to the author and report number. For other use, advance permission must be provided by TØI. ISSN 0808-1190 ISBN 978-82-480-1565-9 Electronic version Oslo, March 2015 Title: Fatigue in operators of land- and sea-based transport Tittel: Trøtthet i norsk land- og sjøtransport. forms in Norway. Literature review and expert opinion. Litteraturgjennomgang og intervjuer. Fatigue in Transport Report III. Author(s): Ross Owen Phillips Forfattere: Ross Owen Phillips Tor-Olav Nævestad Tor-Olav Nævestad Torkel Bjørnskau Torkel Bjørnskau Date: 03.2015 Dato: 03.2015 TØI report: 1395/2015 TØI rapport: 1395/2015 Pages 129 Sider 129 ISBN Electronic: 978-82-480-1612-0 ISBN Elektronisk: 978-82-480-1612-0 ISSN 0808-1190 ISSN 0808-1190 Financed by: The Research Council of Norway Finansieringskilde: Norges forskningsråd Project: 3719 – Fatigue in transport Prosjekt: 3719 – Trøtthet i transport Quality manager: Fridulv Sagberg Kvalitetsansvarlig: Fridulv Sagberg Key words: Fatigue Emneord: Lokfører Maritime Norway Sjøfart Professional drivers Trøtthet Rail Yrkessjåfør Summary: Sammendrag: This report uses literature review and expert interviews to Til tross for at trøtthet er en viktig risikofaktor i norsk vei-, bane- og assess the need for improved fatigue management in sjøtransport, mangler vi gode date om omfanget av problemet blant Norwegian land- and sea-based transport sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Saving in Transport of Goods – a Pilot Project in Rural Natural Resource Based Industries
    Rapport 4/2001 Energy saving in transport of goods – a pilot project in rural natural resource based industries Final report from the European Commission SAVE -project XVII/4.1031/Z/97-229 By Otto Andersen1, Kyrre Groven1, Eivind Brendehaug1, Outi Uusitalo2, Ulla Suutari2, Jarkko Lehtinen2, Peter Ahlvik3 and Hans Hjortsberg3 1Western Norway Research Institute 2VTT - Finland 3Ecotraffic R&D AB - Sweden WNRI Report Title: Report number: Energy saving in transport of goods – a pilot project in rural 4/2001 natural resource based industries. Date: February 2001 Grading: Open Project title: Number of pages Energy saving in transport of goods – a pilot project in rural natural resource based industries. Researchers: Otto Andersen, Kyrre Groven, Eivind Project responsible: Brendehaug, Outi Uusitalo, Ulla Suutari, Jarkko Lehtinen, Karl G. Høyer Peter Ahlvik and Hans Hjortsberg Financed by: Subject heading European Commission DG XVII energy saving, goods transport, measures and actions, rural resource based industries Summary This report presents the results from a project on energy saving in transport of goods. It has been a pilot project in rural natural resource based industries in three Nordic countries. The main object of the project has been to develop and implement actions, strategies and measures for improved energy efficiency in transport of goods. The project has used 3 cases of natural resource based industries, one from each of the three Nordic countries Norway, Sweden and Finland. The cases are fish export in Norway, wood (paper) export in Finland and agricultural products (mainly grain) in Sweden. Pilot actions have been carried out in one company each in Norway and Finland and in two companies in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Ownership in Norwegian Enterprises
    FOREIGN OWNERSHIP IN NORWEGIAN ENTERPRISES SAMFUNNSØKONOMISKE STUDIER NR. 14 FOREIGN OWNERSHIP IN NORWEGIAN ENTERPRISES UTENLANDSKE EIERINTERESSER I NORSKE BEDRIFTER By/Av Arthur Stonehill STATISTISK SENTRALBYRÅ CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS OF NORWAY OSLO 1965 Forord Den avhandlingen som her legges fram som nr. 14 i serien Samfunns- økonomiske studier, er utarbeidd av amerikaneren Arthur Stonehill. Materialet til avhandlingen samlet han under opphold i Norge i tida 1962 til 1964. Det omfatter resultatene av intervjuer og enquéte-undersøkelser som dr. Stonehill selv foretok, opplysninger fra Industri- og håndverksdeparte- mentet og Norges Bank og diverse statistiske oppgaver som er utarbeidd av Statistisk Sentralbyrå. Manuskriptet ble i hovedsak utarbeidd mens dr. Stonehill var tilsatt i Statistisk Sentralbyrå, men fikk sin endelige form etter at han var vendt tilbake til U.S.A. På grunnlag av denne avhandlingen er Arthur Stonehill tildelt graden doctor of philosophy ved University of Cali- fornia, Berkeley. Det materiale som er samlet og analysert i denne avhandlingen, kaster nytt lys over de utenlandske investeringer i norsk næringsliv. Avhandlingens første del gir en inngående historisk analyse av norsk kapitalimport og direkte utenlandske investeringer i norske bedrifter og foretak fra 1814 til 1964. Forfatteren analyserer sammenhengen mellom utenlandsk finansiering, betalingsbalansen og den totale investeringsvirk- somhet innenfor den industrialiseringsprosess Norge gjennomgikk. Analysen omfatter også en undersøkelse av virkningene av skiftende konjunkturer og norsk lovgivning. De større utenlandsk-finansierte foretakenes oppkomst og betydning følges fra næring til næring gjennom de hovedfaser utviklingen har gjennomløpt i dette tidsrommet. I annen del av avhandlingen reiser forfatteren spørsmålet om de uten- landske investeringene har vært til fordel eller ulempe for norsk økonomi.
    [Show full text]
  • Competencies in the Danish Maritime Cluster: a Benchmarking-Analysis
    Competencies in the Danish Maritime Cluster: A benchmarking-analysis Britta Gammelgaard, Henrik Sornn-Friese, Jens Hansen, Mads Jessen and Morten Larsen February 2013 Competencies in the Danish Maritime Cluster: A benchmarking-analysis February 2013 ISBN: 978-87-996049-1-3 This benchmarking-analysis was prepared by the Departments of Operations Management and Center for Shipping Economics and Innovation of Copenhagen Business School, and published by the Danish Maritime Cluster (DKMK) The Danish Maritime Cluster is funded by the Capital Region of Denmark and the European Social Fund 2 Table of contents Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................ 6 1.1. Structure of the benchmarking- analysis ............................................................................ 11 Chapter 2: Norway...................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 History ................................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Maritime Policy ..................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 Logistics ................................................................................................................................. 18 2.3.1 Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006 Quality Quality Rooms
    Moelven-omslag.GB 23-03-07 13:54 Side 1 Annual Report 2006 Quality rooms MOELVEN ANNUALMOELVEN REPORT 2006 www.moelven.com Moelven-omslag.GB 26-03-07 15:46 Side 2 Moelven-rapport.GB 22-03-07 18:07 Side 1 1 Mission – Vision – Values Comments by the CEO MOELVEN'S BRAND PLATFORM The past year has been an excellent year for Moelven. Sales activity increased and profits reached record heights. Among the external factors that helped make the year such a success were the high demand for many of our products in all the Scandinavian countries and a stable supply of Mission: Supplying quality rooms raw materials for the sawmills in most regions. Many years of consolidation without any larger Vision: The natural choice for people building and living Scandinavian style acquisitions or liquidations has been positive for the company, and has allowed the company to implement many minor, but in sum, critical changes that contribute to improving the Group’s Values: competitiveness. All the employees have contributed to last year’s positive and uplifing results, • Sustainable as each of the Group’s 39 business units posted a profit. Moelven respects people and the environment. The company’s business is based on renewable resources. Sustainability and long- term planning have become the company’s competitive advantages. Environmental responsibilities are a priority area. • Reliable Moelven is a reliable business partner. We deliver quality goods at the agreed upon time. A strong focus is put on openness and difficult to think of Moelven as anything else than a honesty - being able to admit mistakes and shortcomings is a solid basis for positive change and credibility.
    [Show full text]