Massaab Al-Aloosy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Massaab Al-Aloosy Massaab Al-Aloosy [email protected] EDUCATION The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy - Tufts University PhD, Fields of study: Middle East and Security Studies February 2018 Dissertation Title: Fundamentalist Metamorphosis: Hezbollah's Evolution from Ideological Ideals to Pragmatic Practices. Related coursework: Understanding the Arab Spring , in Harvard Kennedy School, instructor David Ignatius; Islam and Politics , instructor Vali Nasr The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy – Tufts University Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy June 2013 Thesis title: Iran’s Iraq; the Roots of Tehran’s Influence in Iraq James Madison College – Michigan State University Bachelor of Arts – International Relations with a minor in Political Science June 2009 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE World Peace Foundation , Medford, MA (United States) Researcher June 2013 –September 2013 • Contributed regularly and assisted with editorial efforts for the official blog regarding Middle East affairs http://sites.tufts.edu/reinventingpeace/author/malalo01 • Conducted outreach to gain panelists, participated in the panel, and was part of the committee for a seminar “How Mass Atrocities End: Iraq” that included Kanan Makiya, Joost Hilterman, and Yahiah Al Kubaisi • Edited and translated unclassified government documents that were published in the website as part of the Reinventing Peace Project about Sudan with Alex De Waal Al Jazeera, Doha, Qatar Researcher in the Iraq Desk and Assistant Interview Producer October 2009 – August 2011 • Collected, and analyzed information related to the coverage of the Arab Spring in Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Libya and Yemen by interviewing guests • Shared and obtained information on Iraqi print and online media and created briefs for the editorial board • Monitored, developed, and reported on various events in Iraq, led the coverage for the Iraqi elections • Provided political analysis and socioeconomic assessment on day-to-day events • Connected with and interviewed key political figures such as Iyad Allawi, Saleh Al Mutlaq, and Tariq Al Hashimi as part of the research effort of the changing governance structure in Iraq Al Jazeera, Baghdad, Iraq Journalist January 2004 – June 2005 • Obtained exclusive access for Al Jazeera to the hearing of Saddam Hussein through developed and maintained contacts. Provided access to restricted sites including the Green Zone, and the Kindy Palace, and the Balad Base i • Restored relations between Al-Jazeera and US Army after it was broken post-2003 through arranging high-level meetings and facilitating agreements • Provided all the necessary means to produce reports about Iraq in various provinces, and travelled widely in the country as well and covered the Iraqi insurgency in Fallujah ADDITIONAL SKILLS Languages: Arabic (Full professional proficiency), and English (Native proficiency) Publications: Wrote for the Fletcher Forum: www.fletcherforum.org/2014/02/19/al-aloosy/ ii Fundamentalist Metamorphosis : Hezbollah's Evolution From Ideological Ideals to Pragmatic Practices A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy By Massaab Al-Aloosy In Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2016 Dissertation Committee Richard H. Shultz, Jr Chair Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. Ibrahim Fraihat iii Abstract What is the effect of political change on an insurgency's ideology? What causes an insurgency to perceive who the enemy is? What happens to the ideology when a more imminent, more terrifying threat arises? And is it possible for an insurgency to change the perception of who the enemy is or include yet another one? This research advances the argument that an insurgency would shift the perception of who the enemy is depending on the perceived threat. The ideology will consequently change as well to legitimize the use of violence in order to preserve the group’s survival. The specific case study is the change in Hezbollah’s ideology because of its involvement in the Syrian civil war. Israel was the main enemy from the year Hezbollah was formally created in 1985 and continued to be so after the Israeli withdrawal from Southern Lebanon in 2000. The main aim of Hezbollah now, however, is to help the Syrian regime stay in power because the alternative constitutes an existential threat. Syria has been one of the most important players - at times the sole player - in Lebanon. Consequently, whoever controls Syria would have massive influence in Lebanon so if the Assad regime is toppled the alternative will not be favorable to Hezbollah’s interest. Hezbollah's leadership believed their interest dictates military intervention, and consequently ideology took a legitimizing role through purporting several reasons for intervention in Syria. I employed a within case study through looking at four time periods of Hezbollah's history, and obtained data through interviews, a focus group, and secondary sources and documentation. The results of the research addressed a gap in the literature through explaining a different dynamic between a patron-state and an insurgency. The norm has been a varied support by patron-states to insurgencies, but in this instance the roles are iv reversed. Moreover, the result explained the changing role of insurgency's ideology. While most scholars believe ideology has a fixed role, this research proved ideologies evolve and change. These new phenomena are worthy of academic analysis and may help construct policy prescriptions that could be applied in the Middle East and other parts of the world. Furthermore, there has been an exponential rise in the number of insurgences in several countries that are based on sectarian identities. The finding of the research presented a different understanding as to the significance of ideology for insurgencies. v Table of Content: Chapter 1 - Page 1 1. Introduction – Page 1 a. Problem Statement b. Research Question and Hypothesis 2. Literature review – Page 5 a. Decision Making Process b. Insurgencies' Ideology c. Hezbollah 3. Methodology – Page 20 a. Within Case Analysis b. Research design c. Definitions d. Endogeneity 4. Conclusion – Page 29 Chapter 2 – Page 30 1. On the Outskirts of an Empire – Page 31 a. The Pariah Brother b. The Birth Defects of a State 2. History Walking on Two Legs – Page 42 a. Radical Change b. The Palestinian Cause 3. God's Party – Page 56 a. The Battle for the Shia b. The Israeli Juggernaut c. Ideological Export d. Genesis 4. Conclusion – Page 80 vi Chapter 3 – Page 85 1. Fundamentalist Metamorphosis – Page 87 a. The New Aeon b. Charm Offensive c. Refashioning Islamism d. Relationship Restructuring e. Radical Twins 2. The Trio – Page 106 a. Fighting Goliath b. Lebanon's Baron c. The Poisonous Gift 3. Conclusion – Page 126 Chapter 4 – Page 131 1. The First Arab Victory - 133 a. Resistance Demobilization b. A Disguise of Legitimacy d. The Lost Cause 2. Corresponding Miscalculation – Page 152 a. Israel's New Leadership b. The Result Sheet 3. Evolution in Revolutionary Ideas – Page 167 a. The Manifesto b. Ideological Change? 4. Conclusion – Page 176 Chapter 5 – Page 182 1. The Revolutionary and the Revolutions – Page 184 a. the Ghost of the Past b. Transforming the Nefarious vii 2. Hezbollah in Syria – Page 194 a. The Puppeteer b. Vestiges of Inception c. From the Covert to the Overt 3. The Shia, the Shrine, and the Survival – Page 205 a. The Shia b. The Shrine c. The Survival 4. The Derivative – Page 215 a. Hyper Insurgency b. Indefinite Hemorrhage c. Playing the Great Game Conclusion – Page 223 viii Chapter 1 1. Introduction From the day it was formally created in 1985, Hezbollah based its ideology on absolute animosity towards Israel, uprooting the Lebanese political system, and creating an Islamic theocracy in Lebanon. Although the group evolved tremendously throughout the following decades, Hezbollah continued to regard Israel as the main enemy, and loyalty to the concept of the rule of the jurisprudent ( wilayat al-faqih ) remained at the core of its ideology. And despite the crisis of legitimacy created after the Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon in 2000, the leadership justified the group’s attacks with the intention of liberating the disputed Shebaa Farms and freeing Lebanese prisoners held in Israel. Moreover, Hezbollah's official documents and statements, as in the 1985 Open Letter, reiterated its absolute enmity towards Israel. Yet, one can sense a gradual change in the group’s actions and rhetoric and dramatically so after the Syrian revolution began in 2011. As the Arab Spring buffeted several regimes in the Middle East, the winds of change reached Syria – one of two Hezbollah patron-states. The peaceful mass-demonstrations paved the way for civil war that has been raging for more than five years now. The Assad regime nearly collapsed if it was not for Hezbollah, among other actors. Hezbollah presented several pretexts for its intervention in Syria such as fighting Sunni extremists – or takfiris , defending the Syrian Shia, and protecting Shia religious sites; but Hezbollah was already on the ground before it presented any justifications to preserve its interest. Hezbollah’s intervention in Syria is about the survival of the group because whoever controls Syria ultimately has much influence in Lebanon and holds the lifeline for Hezbollah. In this case not only it is unique that an insurgency is supporting a patron-state 1 survives instead of the other way around, but the effects on the former’s ideology can be clearly noticed. Furthermore, it is for the first time that Lebanon is having an influence in Syria not the other way around. This research explains why an insurgency interferes militarily in a patron-state undergoing a civil war and how that interference affects its ideology. More specifically, it explains three potential aspects: first, the military intervention of an insurgency in a patron-state. An insurgency has an aim and it is supported by a patron-state to achieve that aim. Therefore, it seems uncanny that an insurgency will take the role of a supporter instead.
Recommended publications
  • LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY the Syrian Conflict: Through the Lens of Realpolitik by Alexander Ortiz a Thesis Submitted in Part
    LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY The Syrian Conflict: Through the Lens of Realpolitik By Alexander Ortiz A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in International Affairs School of Arts and Sciences January 2014 To loved ones v Acknowledgments To Professors Salamey, Skulte-Ouasis, and Baroudi. Thank You for everything. Your guidance and help over the length of the program has been much appreciated. To Professor Rowayheb, thank you for being on my thesis board. vi The Syrian Conflict: Through the Lens of Realpolitik Alexander Ortiz Abstract This thesis examines power relations in the security vacuum created by the Syrian conflict. The conflicting nature of Syrian domestic politics has created a political stalemate that needs outside support to be resolved. Inaction on the part of the greater international community has allowed for regional powers to become highly entrenched in the conflict. Regional involvement and the demographics of Syrian parties have been used by popular mediums to describe the conflict as sectarian by nature. The central point of this thesis is to show that the veneer of sectarianism by all parties, both Syrian and regional, is primarily a by-product of competitive self-interest. This is done by showing that the relationships made between Syrian groups and their patrons are based on self-interest and the utility provided in these temporary unions. The seminal political theories of Locke and Hobbes concerning the foundations of political power show the Syrian groups to be acting upon political necessity, not sect. The ambitions of regional powers are analyzed through realist theory to explain power relations in an unregulated political environment both in Syria and in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalashnikovs Into Plowshares: Counterterrorism Psychological Operations Strategies Against Hizballah
    Kalashnikovs into Plowshares: Counterterrorism Psychological Operations Strategies Against Hizballah Andre DeMarce1 [email protected] September 2003 1 Andre DeMarce is the Assistant Director for Intelligence and Analysis at the Terrorism Research Center. Copyright Terrorism Research Center – www.terrorismc.om ANDRE DEMARCE Hizballah Development Within its Cultural, Political, Historic Context2 LEBANON/IRAN/SYRIA/ISRAEL DATE HIZBALLAH Lebanon gains independence. 1943 Civil war erupts between Christians 1958 and Muslims in Lebanon. 1959 Imam Musa al-Sadr invited to become religious leader of the Shia in Lebanon. Six Day War 1967 Al-Sadr founds the Lebanese Shia Islamic Higher Council, Majlis al- Shii al-Aala. PLO expelled from Jordan and 1970- subsequently establishes enclave in 1971 Lebanon. 1974 Al-Sadr founds the “Movement of the Underprivileged” to champion the social, political, economic interests of the downtrodden Shia community of Lebanon. Intra-confessional civil war erupts 1975 Amal is formed. in Lebanon. Syria deploys troops into Lebanon. 1976 Israel invades Lebanon as part of 1978 “Operation Litani.” Iranian Revolution brings 1979 Al-Sadr disappears during trip to Khomeini and his strident brand of Libya invoking notions of the Shia fundamentalist Shia Islam to power. theology of the vanished 12th Imam. 1980 Nabih Berri is appointed head of Amal, Hussein Mussawi appointed deputy and head of Amal militia. Israel annexes the Golan Heights. 1981 Hussein Mussawi breaks from Amal and forms Islamic Amal to operate as vanguard of Iranian Revolution-style fundamentalist Shia Islam in Lebanon, and its transformation into an Islamic state. Israel invades Lebanon to excise 1982 Hizballah is formed. Detail of PLO bases used to attack Israel and Iranian Revolutionary Guards create a ‘security zone’ along arrives in Lebanon to assist with 2 This timeline heavily draws upon the chronology written by Hala Jaber in Hezbollah: Born with a Vengeance (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1997), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Ideology of Hezbollah
    MIDDLE EAST TODAY The Changing Ideology of Hezbollah Massaab Al-Aloosy Middle East Today Series Editors Fawaz A. Gerges Department of International Relations London School of Economics London, UK Nader Hashemi Center for Middle East Studies Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver Denver, CO, USA The Iranian Revolution of 1979, the Iran-Iraq War, the Gulf War, and the US invasion and occupation of Iraq have dramatically altered the ­geopolitical landscape of the contemporary Middle East. The Arab Spring uprisings have complicated this picture. This series puts forward a critical body of first-rate scholarship that reflects the current political and social realities of the region, focusing on original research about contentious politics and social movements; political institutions; the role played by non-­governmental organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Muslim Brotherhood; and the Israeli-Palestine conflict. Other themes of interest include Iran and Turkey as emerging pre-eminent powers in the region, the former an ‘Islamic Republic’ and the latter an emerging democracy currently governed by a party with Islamic roots; the Gulf monarchies, their petrol economies and regional ambitions; potential problems of nuclear proliferation in the region; and the challenges ­confronting the United States, Europe, and the United Nations in the greater Middle East. The focus of the series is on general topics such as social turmoil, war and revolution, international relations, occupation, radicalism, democracy, human
    [Show full text]
  • Aksam Alyousef
    “Harvesting Thorns”: Comedy as Political Theatre in Syria and Lebanon by Aksam Alyousef A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Drama University of Alberta © Aksam Alyousef, 2020 ii ABSTRACT At the end of the 1960s and the beginning of the 70s, political comedy grew exponentially in Syria and Lebanon. This phenomenon was represented mainly in the Tishreen Troupe ,(مسرح الشوك performances of three troupes: Thorns Theatre (Al-Shuk Theatre مسرح and Ziyad Al-Rahbani Theatre (Masrah Ziyad Al-Rahbani ,(فرقة تشرين Ferqet Tishreen) These works met with great success throughout the Arab world due to the audacity .(زياد الرحباني of the themes explored and their reliance on the familiar traditions of Arab popular theatre. Success was also due to the spirit of the first Arab experimental theatre established by pioneers like Maroun Al-Naqqash (1817-1855) and Abu Khalil Al-Qabbani (1835-1902), who in the second half of the nineteenth century mixed comedy, music, songs and dance as a way to introduce theatre performance to a culture unaccustomed to it. However, this theatre started to lose its luster in the early 1990s, due to a combination of political and cultural factors that will be examined in this essay. iii This thesis depends on historical research methodology to reveal the political, social and cultural conditions that led to the emergence and development (and subsequent retreat) of political theatre in the Arab world. My aim is to, first, enrich the Arab library with research material about this theatre which lacks significant critical attention; and second to add new material to the Western Library, which is largely lacking in research about modern and contemporary Arab theatre and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Rose, Broschuere Israel Defense Forces.Pdf
    Editorial ie israelische Armee – ihre offizielle Bezeichnung „Israelische Verteidigungsarmee“ (Israeli Defense Forces – IDF, auf Hebräisch Zahal) – ist ohne Zweifel die bei D weitem stärkste Armee des gesamten Nahen Ostens. Bereits beim ersten israelisch-arabischen Krieg 1948 stellte sich sehr rasch die Überlegenheit Israels heraus, was einerseits auf die massiven Waffenlieferungen aus Europa, die weitaus bessere Ausbildung und Motivation der israelischen SoldatInnen aber auch auf die mangelnde Organisation, Koordination und Ausbildung der arabischen Armeen zurückzuführen war. Das bis heute von Israel und seinen Lobbyisten genährte Narrativ der existentiellen Bedrohung Israels durch „die Araber“ stellt daher eine zynische Verdrehung der Tatsachen dar. Wenn man von einer tatsächlichen Bedrohung sprechen kann, dann von einer der arabischen Staaten durch den in den Nahen Osten implantierten jüdisch- zionistischen Kolonialstaat. Die (Mit)schuld Europas und der USA an den Verbrechen am jüdischen Volk im Rahmen des Holocaust ausnützend hat es Israel mit Gewalt verstanden, beträchtliche arabische Gebiete zu erobern und zwar weit über die von der UNO im Teilungsplan von 1947 (Res. Nr. 181 der UN-Vollversammlung vom 29.11.1947) zugesprochenen Territorien hinaus. Israel hat sich aggressiv gegen alle arabische Nachbarstaaten verhalten und im Laufe der 65-jährigen Geschichte des Konfliktes von jedem betroffenen Staat (Ägypten, Jordanien, Libanon und Syrien) Gebiete besetzt und erobert. Die Besatzung ägyptischer jordanischer und libanesischer Gebiete dauerte Jahrzehnte an, der syrische Golan ist seit 1967 unter israelischer Kontrolle, ebenso der arabische Teil Jerusalems. Heute stellt aber die seit 1967 massiv betriebene – völkerrechtswidrige – Besatzungs-, Landraub- und Siedlungspolitik Israels in den palästinensischen Gebieten (hier geht es vor allem um die sogenannte Westbank) das Haupthindernis für jegliche politische Lösung des palästinensisch-israelischen Konfliktes dar.
    [Show full text]
  • Why They Died Civilian Casualties in Lebanon During the 2006 War
    September 2007 Volume 19, No. 5(E) Why They Died Civilian Casualties in Lebanon during the 2006 War Map: Administrative Divisions of Lebanon .............................................................................1 Map: Southern Lebanon ....................................................................................................... 2 Map: Northern Lebanon ........................................................................................................ 3 I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 4 Israeli Policies Contributing to the Civilian Death Toll ....................................................... 6 Hezbollah Conduct During the War .................................................................................. 14 Summary of Methodology and Errors Corrected ............................................................... 17 II. Recommendations........................................................................................................ 20 III. Methodology................................................................................................................ 23 IV. Legal Standards Applicable to the Conflict......................................................................31 A. Applicable International Law ....................................................................................... 31 B. Protections for Civilians and Civilian Objects ...............................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Private Discounts to Print
    Dissent and Reform in the Arab World: Empowering Democrats A Report of the American Enterprise Institute Dissent and Reform in the Arab World Project Edited by Jeffrey Azarva, Danielle Pletka, and Michael Rubin The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W. Washington D.C., 20036 www.aei.org/books © 2008 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Printed in the United States of America Contents INTRODUCTION, Jeffrey Azarva, Danielle Pletka, and Michael Rubin 1 PART I: ESSAYS BY PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS 9 1. BAHRAIN 11 Challenging Government Control of Media Omran Salman 11 2. EGYPT 19 Challenges to Democratization Ayat M. Abul-Futtouh 19 3. IRAQ 26 Pluralism—Its Wealth and Its Misery Haider Saeed 26 The Development of Shi’ite Islamic Political Theory Sama Hadad 32 4. JORDAN 41 Building a Political Will Jamil al-Nimri 41 The Challenge of Progress Emad Omar 51 5. LEBANON 59 Together: Equal but Different Jad al-Akhaoui 59 Hezbollah and the Problem of State Control Lokman Slim 63 A Country to Be Born Najat Sharafeddine 71 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideological Transformation of Hezbollah Since Its Involvement in the Syrian Civil War : Local Perspectives and Foreign Observations
    The Ideological Transformation of Hezbollah Since its Involvement in the Syrian Civil War : Local Perspectives and Foreign Observations Mémoire Ian Mac Donald Maîtrise en science politique - avec mémoire Maître ès arts (M.A.) Québec, Canada © Ian Mac Donald, 2020 Introduction Political and social movements use ideology as a method of justifying, interpreting, and challenging the surrounding social-political order (McAdam, Doug, et al., 1996). The success with which a social or political movement constructs and expresses the set of explanatory and normative beliefs and assumptions that make up its ideology can often translate into its competitive advantage over contending movements. In the modern nation-state, nationalist ideology, where nations are “imagined communities,” according to Benedict Anderson, is the most common form of political ideology that fabricates a collective intersubjective identity for a population and legitimates groups’ power. However, in Lebanon, sectarianism, where political ideology is tied to a specific religious community, is also a compelling narrative that has so often characterized the ideology of the myriad actors in Lebanese state and society. In the Lebanese political realm, sectarian and nationalist ideologies of organizations and movements both blend and compete with each other as elites vie for political power over populations. Authors of sectarianism often take a constructivist and instrumentalist approach in explaining the ideological power of sectarianism in Lebanon: Just as history demonstrates state leaders’ use of nationalist fervour in the pursuit of political power, sectarianism is also an ideology in which elites can play a manipulative role and exploit the religious identity of populations in order to further their own political goals (Cammett, 2014; Haddad, 2011; Salloukh, Barakat, Al-Habbal, Khattab, & Mikaelian, 2015; Wehrey, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Full Profile (2014)
    Al-Mawred Al-Thaqafi (Culture Resource) Organization launched in 2009 a regional initiative aims to identify the main features of cultural policy in Arab countries. The ultimate goal is to build a Knowledge Base that supports cultural planning and collaboration in the region, as well as propose mechanisms to develop cultural work in Arab countries. First stage of the project targeted preliminary surveys of policies, legislations, and practices that guide cultural work in eight Arab countries: Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Palestine, Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco. The process of Monitoring was conducted in the period between May 2009 and January 2010 by Arab researchers from all eight countries, and thus “Ettijahat. Independent culture” as the regional coordinator of the project developed the surveys and updated its information and data through specialized researchers who reviewed the information and amended it based on the most recent developments in the cultural scene. The study has been completed according to the Compendium model which is adopted in study about cultural policies around the world. Research is divided into the following: 1- Cultural context from a social and historical perspective. 2- Administrative Subsidiarity and decision-making. 3- General objectives and principles of cultural policies. 4- Current topics debated in cultural policy development. 5- Main legal texts in the cultural field. 6- Financing of culture events and institutions. 7- Cultural institutions and new partnerships. 8- Supporting creativity and collaborations. This survey has been conducted in 2009 and 2010 by the researchers Rita Azar and Watfaa Hamadi. The original material of the current survey is found below in black.
    [Show full text]
  • That Is the Only Hope for This Nation!
    07/06/2021 NEWS AM - Rep. Lauren Boebert was ON FIRE! Lauren Boebert: “Democrats Keep Running Their Mouths. We’ll Keep Adding to our Arsenals.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-6yJ1QylVU&t=76s [This may not be a music video, but it is music to our ears. – rdb] "There are those who will say that the liberation of humanity, the freedom of man and mind, is nothing but a dream. They are right. It is the American Dream." -- Archibald MacLeish (1892-1982) Poet, playwright, Librarian of Congress, & Assistant Secretary of State under Franklin Roosevelt Read the Prophets & PRAY WITHOUT CEASING! That is the only hope for this nation! Please Pray that the world would WAKE UP! Time for a worldwide repentance! Remember ALL US soldiers fighting for our freedom around the world These Pray for those in our government to repent of their wicked corrupt ways. Folks Pray for EL – Had clot embolized to brain – successful ‘clot buster’ but long road to go. In Pray for BB – Severe West Nile Fever –still not mobile- improving! Prayer- Pray for RBH – cancer recurrence Check often Pray for DH – Mother removed self from hospice but doing poorly. They Pray for GB – bad reaction from Cancer drug Change! Pray for Ella – Child with serious problems NOTE: Our prayer list was getting very long and there will little follow up. If you have people you want to have on the list please resubmit since we are revising it now– rdb] Pray that The Holy One will lead you in Your preparations for handling the world problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Military and Strategic Affairs Volume 8 | No
    Military and Strategic Affairs Military and Strategic Military and Strategic Affairs Volume 8 | No. 1 | July 2016 Volume 8 Volume The Challenges Facing the Israel Defense Forces, 2015–2016 Gadi Eisenkot Principles of the Israeli Political-Military Discourse | Based on the Recent IDF Strategy Document No. 1 No. Kobi Michael and Shmuel Even Information-Sharing Challenges in an Intra-Sectorial Environment | July 2016 Gabi Siboni and Hadas Klein The Israeli Home Front Command: Missions, Challenges, and Future Prospects Meir Elran The Death of Human Intelligence: How Human Intelligence Has Been Minimized Since the 1960s Bradley A. Lewis The Khorasan Group Ariel Koch Combating Terrorism: Socioeconomic Issues, Boko Haram, and Insecurity in the North-East Region of Nigeria Oluwaseun Bamidele המכון למחקרי ביטחון לאומי THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITYc STUDIES INCORPORATING THE JAFFEE bd CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES ISSN 2307-193X (print) • E-ISSN 2307-8634 (online) Military and Strategic Affairs Volume 8 | No. 1 | July 2016 CONTENTS Editor’s Note | 3 The Challenges Facing the Israel Defense Forces, 2015–2016 | 5 Gadi Eisenkot Principles of the Israeli Political-Military Discourse Based on the Recent IDF Strategy Document | 19 Kobi Michael and Shmuel Even Information-Sharing Challenges in an Intra-Sectorial Environment | 41 Gabi Siboni and Hadas Klein The Israeli Home Front Command: Missions, Challenges, and Future Prospects | 59 Meir Elran The Death of Human Intelligence: How Human Intelligence Has Been Minimized Since the 1960s | 75 Bradley A. Lewis The Khorasan Group | 91 Ariel Koch Combating Terrorism: Socioeconomic Issues, Boko Haram, and Insecurity in the North-East Region of Nigeria | 109 Oluwaseun Bamidele The purpose of Military and Strategic Affairs is to stimulate Military and and enrich the public debate on military issues relating to Strategic Affairs Israel’s national security.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Survey for Israel 2016-2017 Anat Kurz and Shlomo Brom, Editors
    Strategic Survey for Israel 2016-2017 Anat Kurz and Shlomo Brom, Editors Strategic Survey for Israel 2016-2017 Anat Kurz and Shlomo Brom, Editors Institute for National Security Studies The Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), incorporating the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, was founded in 2006. The purpose of the Institute for National Security Studies is first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel’s national security as well as Middle East regional and international security affairs. Second, the Institute aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are – or should be – at the top of Israel’s national security agenda. INSS seeks to address Israeli decision makers and policymakers, the defense establishment, public opinion makers, the academic community in Israel and abroad, and the general public. INSS publishes research that it deems worthy of public attention, while it maintains a strict policy of non-partisanship. The opinions expressed in this publication are the authors’ alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its trustees, boards, research staff, or the organizations and individuals that support its research. Strategic Survey for Israel 2016-2017 Anat Kurz and Shlomo Brom, Editors Graphic design: Michal Semo-Kovetz and Yael Bieber Cover design: Michal Semo-Kovetz Printing: Elinir Cover photo: Two F-35 aircraft in their first flight over Israel, the day after their arrival in Israel, December 13, 2016 Courtesy: Major Ofer / Israeli Air Force website Institute for National Security Studies (a public benefit company) 40 Haim Levanon Street POB 39950 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv 6997556 Israel Tel.
    [Show full text]