DOCSLIB.ORG

Private Discounts to Print

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Private Discounts to Print Dissent and Reform in the Arab World: Empowering Democrats A Report of the American Enterprise Institute Dissent and Reform in the Arab World Project Edited by Jeffrey Azarva, Danielle Pletka, and Michael Rubin The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W. Washington D.C., 20036 www.aei.org/books © 2008 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Printed in the United States of America Contents INTRODUCTION, Jeffrey Azarva, Danielle Pletka, and Michael Rubin 1 PART I: ESSAYS BY PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS 9 1. BAHRAIN 11 Challenging Government Control of Media Omran Salman 11 2. EGYPT 19 Challenges to Democratization Ayat M. Abul-Futtouh 19 3. IRAQ 26 Pluralism—Its Wealth and Its Misery Haider Saeed 26 The Development of Shi’ite Islamic Political Theory Sama Hadad 32 4. JORDAN 41 Building a Political Will Jamil al-Nimri 41 The Challenge of Progress Emad Omar 51 5. LEBANON 59 Together: Equal but Different Jad al-Akhaoui 59 Hezbollah and the Problem of State Control Lokman Slim 63 A Country to Be Born Najat Sharafeddine 71 6. LIBYA 77 Has Rapprochement Worked? Mohamed Eljahmi 77 iii DISSENT AND REFORM IN THE ARAB WORLD 7. SYRIA 85 Mobilizing the Opposition Ammar Abdulhamid 85 8. YEMEN 93 A Country on the Brink Ali Saif Hassan 93 9. TUNISIA 98 Tunisia’s Election Was Undemocratic at All Levels Neila Charchour Hachicha 98 PART II: VOICES FROM THE REGION: A COLLECTION OF EDITORIALS FROM THE ARAB PRESS CALLING FOR REFORM 103 10. IN TUNISIA, THE SOUND OF ENFORCED SILENCE, Neila Charchour Hachicha 105 11. THE FAILURE OF THE INTELLECTUAL AND CULTURAL SYSTEM, Sherif Kamal 107 12. THE NECESSITY OF POLITICAL REFORM, Ibrahim Abdul Majid Saleh 109 13. ON THE BRIEF “DAMASCUS SPRING,” Shaaban Aboud 111 14. LET’S MAKE THE NEW WORLD, Naguib Mahfouz 113 15. IRAQ AND THE CHALLENGES OF CHANGE, Amr Ziab al-Tamimi 114 16. A NEW CALL FOR SELF-CRITICISM, Borhan Ghalion 116 17. KUWAITIS’ SERIOUSNESS IN REFORM, Eid al-Dowaihies 118 18. POLITICAL REFORM IS THE ROAD TO ALL REFORM, Said al-Gamal 120 19. A FRAMEWORK FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL REFORM IN SYRIA, Yassin al-Haj Saleh 122 iv The editors would like to thank Suzanne Gershowitz for her assistance in the early stages of this project. Introduction Jeffrey Azarva, Danielle Pletka, and Michael Rubin Throughout the latter half of the twentieth century, In Washington, the strategic shift met with skepti- U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East prioritized cism. Some within the U.S. foreign policy elite criti- stability. At the height of the Cold War, makers of cized the freedom agenda as a jump from the frying U.S. foreign policy offered tacit support if not outright pan to the fire—a strategic blunder that would under- backing to pro-Western authoritarian regimes they mine the war on terror and empower the very viewed as bulwarks against Soviet expansion and as Islamists the United States and its Arab allies had reliable purveyors of oil. Democracy promotion was sought to marginalize. Those who subscribed to the not a priority. The collapse of the Soviet Union did school of cultural relativism also believed it an exer- not lead to a fundamental reassessment among cise in futility. They argued that the precepts of Islam Washington strategists. In U.S. policy circles, conven- and Arab political culture were antithetical to the tional wisdom remained that partnerships with ethos of democracy. Ridding the Arab world of illiberal Arab governments, no matter how unsavory, tyranny was simply too quixotic: how could the would best serve U.S. national security. United States push for democracy in a region devoid The shock of the September 11, 2001, terrorist of democrats? attacks shattered the belief that autocratic leaders in Yet, despite the belief that the Middle East was Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere were stabilizing a region destined to be contested by either auto- agents who could deliver peace and tamp down cratic elites or a theocratic alternative, liberal Arab Islamic extremism. Following the attacks, many U.S. democrats did—and do—exist. Neither liberalism policymakers and academics reassessed conventional nor advocacy for reform and democracy in the wisdom and suggested that Arab autocracies were the Middle East is a foreign imposition. Even before crux of the problem. Officials questioned whether it U.S. policymakers began speaking of democracy tak- was these dictatorships’ contempt for the rule of law ing root in the Middle East, Arab dissidents, journal- and freedom of the press, as well as their suppression ists, and civil society activists spoke of an Arab of peaceful dissent, that lay behind the radicalization malaise and the need for political, social, and eco- and violence. Accordingly, the White House dispensed nomic reform. In the years following the 1990 Iraqi with the status quo of previous decades and articu- invasion of Kuwait, Arab intellectuals rethought their lated a new policy that pinned U.S. national interests societies’ political stagnation. Increasingly, even state- to the Middle East’s democratic reconfiguration. run newspapers pushed the boundaries of acceptable 1 DISSENT AND REFORM IN THE ARAB WORLD political dialogue. The world of political criticism, from Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, long limited to a discussion of Palestinian aspirations Syria, Tunisia, and Yemen. Each conference was the for freedom, suddenly expanded. culmination of a week-long program designed to give Arab democrats began to exploit the political space participants unvarnished access to the Washington available to them after the liberation of Kuwait. And policymaking community, and a months-long process their voices were heard—not, ironically in the foreign of consultations, questioning, and discussion. After ministries of the Western world or in their embassy meeting with a bipartisan array of congressional staff chancelleries, but rather in the halls of power in the and policymakers in the State Department, Defense Middle East. Indeed, it was these classical liberals, Department, and National Security Council, as well as even more than the Islamists, who Arab governments members of the nongovernmental organization com- targeted with the instruments of state repression. munity and U.S. and Arab media, the participants Their collective voice has since helped not only to returned home with both a better sense of how U.S. discredit the autocrat-theocrat dichotomy, but also to policy is formulated and a support network that can dispel the Western myth that democracy is an alien provide leverage against entrenched governments. concept to the Arab world. The following essays by project participants attest But while their ranks have increased with the to the fact that realizing democracy in the Arab world post-9/11 upturn in U.S. rhetoric and support, is both a desirable and daunting task. These pieces democracy activists continue to face an uphill battle. not only confirm that the democracy debate exists in At home, they remain squeezed. Many dissidents the Middle East, but also reveal that it is nuanced. operate on a tilted playing field that pits them against For instance, in countries like Yemen and Bahrain, authoritarian and Islamist forces, unwitting bedfellows activists seek to break the state monopoly over com- determined to prevent the emergence of any liberal munications. In other states, such as Syria and Tunisia, alternative. Those dissidents who do persist find them- repression permeates society more deeply, and the selves undercut by a lack of resources and an inability reforms sought are more fundamental. to coordinate with democracy activists in other Arab The essays also show that while the freedom countries or with policymakers in the West. agenda made headway during the so-called Arab To remedy this, the American Enterprise Institute Spring of 2005—Egypt’s first ever multicandidate (AEI) inaugurated the Dissent and Reform in the Arab presidential vote that September followed free World project to enable prominent Arab democracy elections in Iraq and the Palestinian territories in activists first to write about the challenges to dissent January—regional potentates are still committed to and reform in their own countries; and then to estab- strangling opposition in the cradle. Today, a quick lish working relationships with each other and a wide survey of the countries featured in Dissent and Reform array of U.S. policymakers in order to obviate the reveals that with nostalgia for realism on the rise need for a middleman in transmitting their messages. among U.S. policymakers, many Arab leaders have They should no longer need to rely on the good begun to roll back on reform. graces of Western diplomats, too often uninterested in shaking up the status quo. AEI provided both a venue and administrative support, but it did not intervene in Egypt shaping the content of their message. In 2006, AEI worked to identify those activists Nowhere has this backsliding been more dis- who have advocated freedom of the press, gender cernible than in Egypt, where democracy and civil equality, religious tolerance, economic liberalization, society activists have come under increasing fire electoral reform, and a host of other reforms. During from the regime of Hosni Mubarak. Once con- the course of the year, AEI held three public confer- sidered the linchpin for U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Key Actors and Abbreviations
    Key actors and abbreviations The Assad regime and its allies ‘The regime’ Bashar al-Assad, Syrian President 2000– Hafez al-Assad, Syrian President 1971–2000 Asma al-Assad (née Akhras), Syria’s First Lady 2000– Maher al-Assad, brother of Bashar al-Assad, Commander of Republican Guard and 4th Armoured Division Anisa Makhlouf, mother of Bashar al-Assad Assif Shawkat, brother-in-law of Bashar al-Assad, head of military intelligence 2005–9, deputy minister of defence 2011–12 Rami Makhlouf, cousin of Bashar al-Assad, wealthy businessman Manaf Tlass, Republican Guard General, defected 2012 Farouk al-Sharaa, First Vice President of Syria 2006– Walid al-Muallem, Foreign Minister 2006– Bouthaina Shabaan, political and media adviser to the Syrian President 2008– Ba’ath – Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party, the ruling party of Syria since 1963 Mukhabarat – Set of notorious regime intelligence agencies Shabiha – Gangs of irregular pro-regime thugs NDF – National Defence Force, formed 2013 Russia Vladimir Putin, Russian President 2000–8, 2012–, Russian Prime Minister 2008–12 Dmitri Medvedev, Russian President 2008–12, Russian Prime Minister 2012–20 Sergei Lavrov, Foreign Minister 2004– Mikhail Bogdanov, Deputy Foreign Minister 2011– Iran Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran 1989– xii 5146.indd xii 19/06/20 5:00 PM KEY ACTORS AND ABBREVIATIONS xiii Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iranian President 2005–13 Hassan Rouhani, Iranian President 2013– Ali Akbar Salehi, Foreign Minister 2010–13 Mohammad Javad Zarif, Foreign Minister 2013– Qassem Suleimani, Commander
    [Show full text]
  • Heirs of the Prophet: Islamic Authority and International Politics in the 21 Century by James A. Mikulec, Jr. B.A., Mercyhurst C
    Heirs of the Prophet: Islamic Authority and International Politics in the 21 st Century by James A. Mikulec, Jr. B.A., Mercyhurst College, May 2005 M.A., George Washington University, August 2007 A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 31, 2014 Dissertation directed by Marc Lynch Professor of Political Science and International Affairs and of Media and Public Affairs The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that James A. Mikulec, Jr. has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of December 13, 2013. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Heirs of the Prophet: Islamic Authority and International Politics in the 21 st Century James A. Mikulec, Jr. Dissertation Research Committee: Marc Lynch, Professor of Political Science and International Affairs and of Media and Public Affairs, Dissertation Director Nathan Brown, Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, Committee Member Martha Finnemore, University Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2014 by James A. Mikulec, Jr. All rights reserved iii Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to Jessica and to my family, especially my parents, James and Donna Mikulec, and my grandparents, Peter and Joyce Izzi and Joseph and Laura Mikulec, who always encouraged me to pursue the things that I love. Without their constant support, I would not be here today. iv Acknowledgements This dissertation was written during (and, in some cases, was an eyewitness to) a particularly important, but volatile period in the political and social history of the Middle East and the Muslim world.
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of Texts Celebrating Joss Whedon and His Works Krista Silva University of Puget Sound, [email protected]
    Student Research and Creative Works Book Collecting Contest Essays University of Puget Sound Year 2015 The Wonderful World of Whedon: A Collection of Texts Celebrating Joss Whedon and His Works Krista Silva University of Puget Sound, [email protected] This paper is posted at Sound Ideas. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/book collecting essays/6 Krista Silva The Wonderful World of Whedon: A Collection of Texts Celebrating Joss Whedon and His Works I am an inhabitant of the Whedonverse. When I say this, I don’t just mean that I am a fan of Joss Whedon. I am sincere. I live and breathe his works, the ever-expanding universe— sometimes funny, sometimes scary, and often heartbreaking—that he has created. A multi- talented writer, director and creator, Joss is responsible for television series such as Buffy the Vampire Slayer , Firefly , Angel , and Dollhouse . In 2012 he collaborated with Drew Goddard, writer for Buffy and Angel , to bring us the satirical horror film The Cabin in the Woods . Most recently he has been integrated into the Marvel cinematic universe as the director of The Avengers franchise, as well as earning a creative credit for Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. My love for Joss Whedon began in 1998. I was only eleven years old, and through an incredible moment of happenstance, and a bit of boredom, I turned the television channel to the WB and encountered my first episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer . I was instantly smitten with Buffy Summers. She defied the rules and regulations of my conservative southern upbringing.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Lebanon's Political Paralysis
    MENU Policy Analysis / Congressional Testimony Assessing Lebanon’s Political Paralysis, Economic Crisis, and Challenges for U.S. Policy by David Schenker Jul 29, 2021 Also published in House Foreign Affairs Committee ABOUT THE AUTHORS David Schenker David Schenker is the Taube Senior Fellow at The Washington Institute and former Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs. Articles & Testimony A former assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs diagnoses the country's incapacitated institutions and prescribes remedies for its entrenched corruption and Iranian/Hezbollah domination. he following testimony was prepared for a hearing before the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the T Middle East, North Africa, and Global Counterterrorism. The contours of Lebanon’s slow-motion economic collapse are by now well known. In the aftermath of the fifteen- year civil war, Lebanon borrowed huge amounts of money to rebuild, accumulating a mountain of debt that was funded by borrowing from local banks brimming with expatriate remittances. Even as the debt approached an unsustainable level of 150 percent of GDP, new money continued to flow into Lebanon, lured by obscene interest rates, particularly on Lebanese lira deposits—an expensive but effective tactic intended to encourage confidence in the shaky currency. Some early warning signs of impending trouble emerged following the outbreak of the 2011 Syrian civil war, yet the Ponzi scheme endured. Over time, however, the war took a toll on Lebanon’s already troubled economy, as exports decreased, a million refugees arrived, foreign remittances slowed, Gulf state funding dried up (as the Iranian-backed Shia militia Hezbollah increasingly dominated the state), and new funding became unattainable.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM Syrian Supplemental
    PRISM syria A JOURNAL OF THE CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS About PRISM PRISM is published by the Center for Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, and other partners Vol. 4, Syria Supplement on complex and integrated national security operations; reconstruction and state-building; 2014 relevant policy and strategy; lessons learned; and developments in training and education to transform America’s security and development Editor Michael Miklaucic Communications Contributing Editors Constructive comments and contributions are important to us. Direct Alexa Courtney communications to: David Kilcullen Nate Rosenblatt Editor, PRISM 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64, Room 3605) Copy Editors Fort Lesley J. McNair Dale Erikson Washington, DC 20319 Rebecca Harper Sara Thannhauser Lesley Warner Telephone: Nathan White (202) 685-3442 FAX: (202) 685-3581 Editorial Assistant Email: [email protected] Ava Cacciolfi Production Supervisor Carib Mendez Contributions PRISM welcomes submission of scholarly, independent research from security policymakers Advisory Board and shapers, security analysts, academic specialists, and civilians from the United States Dr. Gordon Adams and abroad. Submit articles for consideration to the address above or by email to prism@ Dr. Pauline H. Baker ndu.edu with “Attention Submissions Editor” in the subject line. Ambassador Rick Barton Professor Alain Bauer This is the authoritative, official U.S. Department of Defense edition of PRISM. Dr. Joseph J. Collins (ex officio) Any copyrighted portions of this journal may not be reproduced or extracted Ambassador James F. Dobbins without permission of the copyright proprietors. PRISM should be acknowledged whenever material is quoted from or based on its content.
    [Show full text]
  • A Main Document V202
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: TELEVISION NEWS AND THE STATE IN LEBANON Jad P. Melki, Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Dissertation directed by: Professor Susan D. Moeller College of Journalism This dissertation studies the relationship between television news and the state in Lebanon. It utilizes and reworks New Institutionalism theory by adding aspects of Mitchell’s state effect and other concepts devised from Carey and Foucault. The study starts with a macro-level analysis outlining the major cultural, economic and political factors that influenced the evolution of television news in that country. It then moves to a mezzo-level analysis of the institutional arrangements, routines and practices that dominated the news production process. Finally, it zooms in to a micro-level analysis of the final product of Lebanese broadcast news, focusing on the newscast, its rundown and scripts and the smaller elements that make up the television news story. The study concludes that the highly fragmented Lebanese society generated a similarly fragmented and deeply divided political/economic elite, which used its resources and access to the news media to solidify its status and, by doing so, recreated and confirmed the politico-sectarian divide in this country. In this vicious cycle, the institutionalized and instrumentalized television news played the role of mediator between the elites and their fragmented constituents, and simultaneously bolstered the political and economic power of the former while keeping the latter tightly held in their grip. The hard work and values of the individual journalist were systematically channeled through this powerful institutional mechanism and redirected to serve the top of the hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • SFFA V. Harvard: How Affirmative Action Myths Mask White Bonus
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 4-2019 SFFA v. Harvard: How Affirmative Action Myths Mask White Bonus Jonathan P. Feingold Boston University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Jonathan P. Feingold, SFFA v. Harvard: How Affirmative Action Myths Mask White Bonus, 107 California Law Review 707 (2019). Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/828 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SFFA v. Harvard: How Affirmative Action Myths Mask White Bonus Jonathan P. Feingold* In the ongoing litigation of Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, Harvard faces allegations that its once-heralded admissions process discriminates against Asian Americans. Public discourse has revealed a dominant narrative: affirmative action is viewed as the presumptive cause of Harvard’s alleged “Asian penalty.” Yet this narrative misrepresents the plaintiff’s own theory of discrimination. Rather than implicating affirmative action, the underlying allegations portray the phenomenon of “negative action”—that is, an admissions regime in which White applicants take the seats of their more qualified Asian-American counterparts. Nonetheless, we are witnessing a broad failure to see this case for what it is. This misperception invites an unnecessary and misplaced referendum on race-conscious admissions at Harvard and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE the Arab Spring Abroad
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE The Arab Spring Abroad: Mobilization among Syrian, Libyan, and Yemeni Diasporas in the U.S. and Great Britain DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Sociology by Dana M. Moss Dissertation Committee: Distinguished Professor David A. Snow, Chair Chancellor’s Professor Charles Ragin Professor Judith Stepan-Norris Professor David S. Meyer Associate Professor Yang Su 2016 © 2016 Dana M. Moss DEDICATION To my husband William Picard, an exceptional partner and a true activist; and to my wonderfully supportive and loving parents, Nancy Watts and John Moss. Thank you for everything, always. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ACRONYMS iv LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii CURRICULUM VITAE viii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION xiv INTRODUCTION 1 PART I: THE DYNAMICS OF DIASPORA MOVEMENT EMERGENCE CHAPTER 1: Diaspora Activism before the Arab Spring 30 CHAPTER 2: The Resurgence and Emergence of Transnational Diaspora Mobilization during the Arab Spring 70 PART II: THE ROLES OF THE DIASPORAS IN THE REVOLUTIONS 126 CHAPTER 3: The Libyan Case 132 CHAPTER 4: The Syrian Case 169 CHAPTER 5: The Yemeni Case 219 PART III: SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF THE ARAB SPRING CHAPTER 6: The Effects of Episodic Transnational Mobilization on Diaspora Politics 247 CHAPTER 7: Conclusion and Implications 270 REFERENCES 283 ENDNOTES 292 iii LIST OF ACRONYMS FSA Free Syria Army ISIS The Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham, or Daesh NFSL National Front for the Salvation
    [Show full text]
  • Roles of Arabic Language in Determination of Sunnah Corruption
    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 10, No. 9, 2020, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2020 HRMARS Roles of Arabic Language in Determination of Sunnah Corruption Muhammad Muthi`ul Haqq Fatah Yasin & Basri Ibrahim To Link this Article: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7888 DOI:10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7888 Received: 04 June 2020, Revised: 10 July 2020, Accepted: 12 August 2020 Published Online: 27 September 2020 In-Text Citation: (Yasin, & Ibrahim, 2020) To Cite this Article: Yasin, M. M. H. F., & Ibrahim, B. (2020). Roles of Arabic Language in Determination of Sunnah Corruption. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(9), 952-961. Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com) This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode Vol. 10, No. 9, 2020, Pg. 952 - 961 http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS JOURNAL HOMEPAGE Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/publication-ethics 952 International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 10, No. 9, 2020, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2020 HRMARS Roles of Arabic Language in Determination of Sunnah Corruption Muhammad Muthi`ul Haqq Fatah Yasin1 & Basri Ibrahim2 1University Islam Malaysia, Cyberjaya, Malaysia/ Kolej Universiti Islam Perlis, Perlis, Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalashnikovs Into Plowshares: Counterterrorism Psychological Operations Strategies Against Hizballah
    Kalashnikovs into Plowshares: Counterterrorism Psychological Operations Strategies Against Hizballah Andre DeMarce1 [email protected] September 2003 1 Andre DeMarce is the Assistant Director for Intelligence and Analysis at the Terrorism Research Center. Copyright Terrorism Research Center – www.terrorismc.om ANDRE DEMARCE Hizballah Development Within its Cultural, Political, Historic Context2 LEBANON/IRAN/SYRIA/ISRAEL DATE HIZBALLAH Lebanon gains independence. 1943 Civil war erupts between Christians 1958 and Muslims in Lebanon. 1959 Imam Musa al-Sadr invited to become religious leader of the Shia in Lebanon. Six Day War 1967 Al-Sadr founds the Lebanese Shia Islamic Higher Council, Majlis al- Shii al-Aala. PLO expelled from Jordan and 1970- subsequently establishes enclave in 1971 Lebanon. 1974 Al-Sadr founds the “Movement of the Underprivileged” to champion the social, political, economic interests of the downtrodden Shia community of Lebanon. Intra-confessional civil war erupts 1975 Amal is formed. in Lebanon. Syria deploys troops into Lebanon. 1976 Israel invades Lebanon as part of 1978 “Operation Litani.” Iranian Revolution brings 1979 Al-Sadr disappears during trip to Khomeini and his strident brand of Libya invoking notions of the Shia fundamentalist Shia Islam to power. theology of the vanished 12th Imam. 1980 Nabih Berri is appointed head of Amal, Hussein Mussawi appointed deputy and head of Amal militia. Israel annexes the Golan Heights. 1981 Hussein Mussawi breaks from Amal and forms Islamic Amal to operate as vanguard of Iranian Revolution-style fundamentalist Shia Islam in Lebanon, and its transformation into an Islamic state. Israel invades Lebanon to excise 1982 Hizballah is formed. Detail of PLO bases used to attack Israel and Iranian Revolutionary Guards create a ‘security zone’ along arrives in Lebanon to assist with 2 This timeline heavily draws upon the chronology written by Hala Jaber in Hezbollah: Born with a Vengeance (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1997), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transcript of the Hearing Held on 16 March 2015 in the Case Of
    20150316_STL-11-01_T_T128_OFF_PUB_EN 1/73 PUBLIC Official Transcript Procedural Matters (Open Session) Page 1 1 Special Tribunal for Lebanon 2 In the case of The Prosecutor v. Ayyash, Badreddine, Merhi, 3 Oneissi, and Sabra 4 STL-11-01 5 Presiding Judge David Re, Judge Janet Nosworthy, 6 Judge Micheline Braidy, Judge Walid Akoum, and 7 Judge Nicola Lettieri - [Trial Chamber] 8 Monday, 16 March 2015 - [Trial Hearing] 9 [Open Session] 10 --- Upon commencing at 10.40 a.m. 11 THE REGISTRAR: The Special Tribunal for Lebanon is sitting in an 12 open session in the case of the Prosecutor versus Ayyash, Badreddine, 13 Merhi, Oneissi, and Sabra, case number STL-11-01. 14 PRESIDING JUDGE RE: Good morning to everyone. We are sitting 15 today to hear the evidence of Mr. Bassem El-Sabeh, but first let's take 16 the appearances starting with the Prosecution. Good morning to you, 17 Mr. Cameron. 18 MR. CAMERON: Good morning, Your Honour. It's Graeme Cameron for 19 the Prosecution today, assisted by Ms. Tanja Zekaj. 20 PRESIDING JUDGE RE: And for the Legal Representative for the 21 Victims. 22 MR. HAYNES: Good morning, Your Honour. Peter Haynes and 23 Mohammad Mattar for the participating victims, assisted by Kinga Tibori. 24 PRESIDING JUDGE RE: And the Defence. 25 MR. AOUN: Mr. President, Your Honours, good morning. Good Monday, 16 March 2015 STL-11-01 Interpretation serves to facilitate communication. Only the original speech is authentic. 20150316_STL-11-01_T_T128_OFF_PUB_EN 2/73 PUBLIC Official Transcript Procedural Matters (Open Session) Page 2 1 morning, everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Affirming Affirmative Action by Affirming White Privilege: SFFA V
    Affirming Affirmative Action by Affirming White Privilege: SFFA v. Harvard JEENA SHAH* INTRODUCTION Harvard College’s race-based affirmative action measures for student admissions survived trial in a federal district court.1 Harvard’s victory has since been characterized as “[t]hrilling,” yet “[p]yrrhic.”2 Although the court’s reasoning should be lauded for its thorough assessment of Harvard’s race-based affirmative action, the roads not taken by the court should be assessed just as thoroughly. For instance, NYU School of Law Professor Melissa Murray commented that, much like the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Grutter v. Bollinger3 (which involved the University of Michigan Law School), the district court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, by “focus[ing] on diversity as the sole grounds on which the use of race in admissions may be justified,” avoided “engag[ing] more deeply and directly with the question of whether affirmative action is now merely a tool to promote pluralism or remains an appropriate remedy for longtime systemic, state-sanctioned oppression.”4 This Essay, however, criticizes the district court’s assessment of Harvard’s use of race-based affirmative action at all, given that the lawsuit’s central claim had nothing to do with it. In a footnote, the court addresses the real claim at hand—discrimination against Asian- American applicants vis-à-vis white applicants resulting from race-neutral components of the admissions program.5 Had the analysis in this footnote served as the central basis of the court’s ruling, it could have both * Associate Professor of Law, City University of New York School of Law.
    [Show full text]